Top 10 Greatest Men's Tennis Players of All Time

@top-person
#tennis #grandslam
Top 10 Greatest Men's Tennis Players of All Time
#1 ranked Djokovic is Serbia nationality and I put wrong flag (Poland) I’m sorry about this issue.
and I will do of my best for other next videos. Thanks
#billionaires #richest #money
We are bring all of you to enjoy the Top SuperStar Net Worth and life style, etc... for more videos please visit our KZbin channel “Top Person” thanks for watching and followed our page or KZbin channel.
Credit to:
#www.wimbledon.com
#www.tokyvideo.com
#web.facebook.com
#www.usopen.org
00:00 Introduction
00:10 Ken Rosewall
00:37 Andre Agassi
00:59 John McEnroe
01:24 Jimmy Connors
01:49 Ivan Lendl
02:14 Bjorn Borg
02:40 Pete Sampras
03:04 Rod Laver
03:30 Roger Federer
03:55 Rafael Nadal
04:20 Novak Djokovic

[@dylanjones6038]

Djokovic is Serbian not polish

[@Dave-im3lm]

All the same to us😄

[@top-person]

Sorry this is my mistake cause it’s first time for me to make KZbin. i will try of my best to do better other videos next time.

[@top-person]

Sorry this is my mistake cause it’s first time for me to make KZbin. I will try of my best to do better other videos next time

[@fatboi1283]

@@top-person damn, 8k views on your first KZbin video, that is really good

[@top-person]

Thanks for cmt and support

[@AnthonyHirsch]

1 Novak Djokovic 2 Roger Federer 3 Rafael Nadal 4 Rod Laver 5 Pete Sampras 6 Ken Rosewall 7 Jimmy Connors 8 Bjorn Borg 9 Pancho Gonzales 10 Roy Emerson Agassi, Tilden, McEnroe, and Lendl would be next up

[@ramjeenakka586]

Nadal is better than fed and djoko fr

[@AnthonyHirsch]

@@ramjeenakka586 genuinely want to hear your arguments for it, hes a legend, I've got him at #3. Dont want to put him higher. But I'll hear out your points ..

[@ramjeenakka586]

​@@AnthonyHirschwhat arguments bro he has more big titles more gs more masters more olympic gold leading h2h in slams and overall and never defeated nadal in fo

[@RamZar50]

Greatest Men’s Singles Tennis Players of the Open Era - since 1968 (Grand Slams Won / Total Tournaments Won) 1. Rafael Nadal (22/92) 2. Novak Djokovic (21/90) 3. Roger Federer (20/103) 4. Jimmy Connors (8/109) 5. Ivan Lendl (8/94) 6. Pete Sampras (14/64) 7. Bjorn Borg (11/66) 8. John McEnroe (7/77) 9. Andre Agassi (8/60)

[@top-person]

Thanks for cmt

[@stephenmeitai7622]

1. Djokovic 2. Rod Laver 3. Federer 4. Nadal

[@sojiroseta98]

For some reason when he says "he born in...." i just cant help but read it in a Guillermo voice like when he tries to interview Bron "LEEBRON!" 🤣

[@yacovmitchenko1490]

A very reasonable list and ranking.

[@Summon256]

I agree with every other ranking though from 9th to 1st! This is spot on!

[@quasar4601]

This list is perfect 👍 Honorable mentions Rosewall , P. Gonzales , Becker , Edberg , Wilander , Newcombe ❤

[@ThePoui777]

Best top!!!

[@akhileshnanoti1256]

Roger on 3 Rd 😱😭

[@nleezie895]

Pretty good list but I would have put Sampress in the top 4

[@ThePoui777]

Rod Laver best

[@yonirani]

But he didn't make french opentitle.

[@quasar4601]

Laver was more decorated then Pete

[@stephenmeitai7622]

Djokovic 20 Grandslam with 6 Wimbledon ? What the fuck ? Djokovic already has 21 Grandslam and 7th Wimbledon. Why Djokovic Tournaments were cut off ? Completely racist

[@Summon256]

My top-10 is identical to yours, except i would replace Rosewall with Becker and moved Rosewall to 11th place and added Edberg and Wilander at 12th and 13th place respectively!

[@top-person]

Thanks for cmt

[@dylanjones6038]

You should do another tennis vid top ten current players

[@top-person]

Thanks for recommendations

[@girishs1480]

Disguising for the fact that , just stats are considered while rating but not skills . Roger Federer is definitely better skilled player than the baseliners like Rafa or Nole Fact is that Fed was a serve and volley player who grew up on fast courts and had to adapt to courts being slowed down massively. It's also a known fact that the courts were slowed down to accommodate the baseliners and long rallies

[@toastedcupcake1052]

Wimbledon open???

[@muralikrishnag1629]

Just by winning more grandslams Nadal can not be rated as 2nd best.First of all number of weeks ranking as number one player is the most crucial factor to decide whether one can be rated as the best along with winning Year ending ATP championship.So Nadal can never be rated superior to either Djokovic or Federer in those aspects.Djokovic was number one for 373 weeks,followed by Federer 310 weeks,Pete Sampras 286 weeks,Ivan Lendl 270 weeks,Jimmy Connors 268 weeks and Rafael Nadal 209 weeks. Year ending finals where top eight players participate is called as ATP finals. Federer won 6 times,followed by Djokovic,Ivan Lendl,Pete Sampras 5 titles each.Nadal never won even once the ATP finals loosing twice, beaten by Roger Federer in 2010 and Djokovic in 2013. One can conclude that Nadal is the greatest clay court player but never above Djokovic or Federer with respect to GOAT title as both of them are much more superior players as compared to Nadal both on Grass or hard courts.

[@top-person]

Thanks for cmt

[@jmilne5751]

Just proves you don't have to be number 1 to win the most slams with the best win/loss ratio of all time & olympic gold & multiple davis cups & 4 tournaments 10 or more times...no other player in history has done that

[@jamesobrien1842]

He was born

[@krivi7166]

Novak 👌💪🏻🥇🇷🇸

[@erichaynes7502]

Fed, Djokovic, Nadal definitely top 3. The rest(in order)are Sampras, Borg, McEnroe, Connors, Agassi, Lendl. I agree Laver is in the top 10, maybe 1, maybe 10 it's up to you.

[@top-person]

Thanks for cmt

[@turinturambar501]

Good video. My ranking would be: 1 - Federer 2 - Nadal 3 - Borg 4 - Djokovic 5 - Sampras 6 - Laver

[@top-person]

Thanks for cmt

[@blackgruya011]

Who cares what your stupidity means?! He did just great and realistic.

[@noelle2see]

🤦🏼‍♂️🤦🏼‍♂️🤦🏼‍♂️🤦🏼‍♂️🤦🏼‍♂️🤦🏼‍♂️🤦🏼‍♂️🤦🏼‍♂️

[@4lugan]

No. #1 Djokovic #2 Nadal (very close) #3 Borg (never played in Australia, retired at 25 years old, at his prime) #4 Federer. His winning took place from 2003-2008 . His opponents’ ELO rating and winning percentage were below 70%. Read the statistics.

[@borisbalta2542]

😂

[@Dman9fp]

Murray may not be the most accomplished on paper, but in his peak went toe to toe with the big 3 Plenty a time & could beat them. Usually lost more times than not against them in slams sure, but for a while it was the big 4 not just the big 3, he was much closer to the big 3 than anybody else on tour was to him, minus clay for a few years (even tho clearly big 3 are still the goat, can be very subjective how you rank them) Which is why it's so hard to compare era's, let alone what exactly constitutes "greatest". Is it the most titles? Dominating an era? Peak play? Most well rounded? Just my 2 cents can only really make feasible lists for pre-modern era and modern era. For the former it's between, in no exact order, Laver/ Gonzales (went pro during his peak years, from what I've heard and seen somewhat he was by far the best/ changed the game for nearly a decade) Borg/ Connors/ McEnroe/ Rosewall/ Newcombe, etc. Wasn't around back then so I don't know all the particulars on their consistencies and winning big tournaments for the time (i.e. seems Connors won just as many if not more big tournaments at the time than Borg, altho now it's all about slam count, even tho Nobody counted until Sampras neared the record) which is why I'm not ranking them then Modern era (1990+) something like Big 3, Sampras, Agassi, Murray, so on Edit: but even then, wouldn't be surprised if someone else wants to split it further into pre-open era and early open era lists (let alone how do you judge Tilden, Budge, Riggs, Kramer etc. they were great for the early to mid 20th century, but of course the sport evolves/ I get why they're overlooked...

[@top-person]

Thanks for watching my video

[@RCC_1]

Yeah, Murray would be in my top 10 easily. He did not win as much as others, but that was just due to the Big 3 dominance. Same happened with Ferrer, Del Potro and even Wawrinka.

[@borisbalta2542]

Rafa or Novak.

[@rickjones257]

Great List but Nadal should now be at number One. He has 22 Grand Slams. More than any player in Tennis History.

[@shannonadkinsmusic5767]

Wrong. He has that record only because Djokovic was banned from the AO and US Open. Nadal would currently have 21 slams and Novak at least 22 (probably 23) if not for that. Also, let's not forget that Novak has consistently dominated the tour since 2011 (and owned Rafa during that time), has a winning record against Rafa and Roger, and has a more balanced resume (well over 60% of Rafa's slams have been at the French).

[@justusbeweel1109]

@@shannonadkinsmusic5767 novak would have like 16 slams if it weren’t for rafas injuries. If the play the if game Rafa still comes out ahead

[@shannonadkinsmusic5767]

@@justusbeweel1109 that's ridiculous. Novak has owned Rafa for a decade.

[@top-person]

Thanks for cmt

[@hipogresia5908]

Rafa and Novak BEST ever!!

[@top-person]

Thanks for cmt but it’s time for next generation right now.

[@mobystwin]

With the exception of Federer

[@hipogresia5908]

@@mobystwin Fed 3

[@loloforge2841]

This is soooooo complicated and each person here may go with their favorite while others may make their own rules for the goat. So who has been ranked #1 (in first place) in 6 straight years? Only one person. Pistol Pete. If this is so easy to achieve why nobody has done it? I am not saying he is the absolute shoe in for #1, but this is a complicated subject and it depends on who makes up the criteria.

[@63002]

Love Conners but John's better than lendl and Jimmy.. John the best doubles and Davis Cup player. Ever

[@Summon256]

I’m not sure Rosewall belongs where you put him…maybe as honorable mention maybe…but he was too irrelevant for way too long to be considered top-10 all-time…and especially in open era! Tenth spot should belong to Becker imho…

[@top-person]

Thanks for cmt

[@4lugan]

#1 Djokovic #2 Nadal very close #3 Borg #4 Federer

[@RCC_1]

Big disagreement, but it's fair.

[@CookEamonster95]

Why is Federer #4? Borg has 9 less slams and many less weeks #1…

[@turinturambar501]

@@CookEamonster95 Borg retired incredibly young and in his prime. Federer played much longer, that's why he has more titles and more weeks as number 1, but it's hard to decide who was the better player. I personally go with Federer, but Borg is close.

[@theaustrianart-teacher8787]

Nah Thats cap federer is not 4th even considère by many the goat so no

[@user-cy6xl3vd3f]

@@turinturambar501 he played longer à became a living legend while he was still on tour, that's why he is greater. Greatness is not just titles. Borg couldn't hold his shit in front of McEnroe by 1981 anyway.

[@quasar4601]

I think Federer was more accomplished then nadal Fed has more titles in Aus, US and W

[@ramjeenakka586]

No he has not beat nadal in fo and nadal won every gs atleast twice

[@quasar4601]

@@ramjeenakka586 . Federer did far better than NADAL in 3/4 majors

[@ramjeenakka586]

​@@quasar4601but covering all four is superior

[@quasar4601]

@@ramjeenakka586 Fed won all 4 Djokovic, Fed , Nad, Lav, Samp

[@supermovietimebros6770]

Connors is better than McEnroe and Agassi?!

[@ThePoui777]

yes

[@supermovietimebros6770]

@@ThePoui777 McEnroe won basically every big match against connors except Wimbledon 82 then he crushed him at Wimbledon after that and everywhere else. Agassi played connors a couple times at the us open when he was like 18 and beat him straight sets and five sets consecutive years, and ok connors was 36 but he was playing exactly the same tennis. Clearly if you watch the tape of Agassi then and skip ahead to 1999 Agassi he’s super saiyin by comparison. I’m not going off majors I’m going off the tape of who was a better player at their best. Even in connors dominant era he would get beat by Arthur Ashe or Newcombe and definitely borg had him completely stymied, and McEnroe was essentially Borgs equal if not better. Agassi is so underrated its criminal. He was playing djokovic style tennis with less technology when serve volley was much easier to win with. Connors in my view was an overachiever underdog who played so hard he outworked many players who should’ve beat him. But he also lost mostly to his contemporaries.

[@ThePoui777]

@@supermovietimebros6770 Jimmy Connors has won 109 ATP tournaments and has been world number one for 160 consecutive weeks.A record that has lasted more than 25 years.1274 victories!!!

[@supermovietimebros6770]

@@ThePoui777 by that standard he’s better than Federer Sampras Nadal and djokovic. Obviously those four would wipe the floor with connors. I don’t think connors is even better than Becker

[@mobystwin]

Yes

[@khmak9387]

Someone should fix the English 😅

[@top-person]

Thanks for comment

[@michaelvbb7107]

1. Borg 2. Laver 3. Federer 4. Djokovic 5. Connors 6. Lendl 7. Nadal 8. Sampras 9. Wilander 10. McEnroe

[@mobystwin]

I like the way you think

[@hipogresia5908]

7 Nadal? 😂

[@Joseph-be3tv]

Are we supposed to take this seriously

[@enriqueenrique]

DJOKOVIC WISHES HE WAS #1..........RAFA IS THE G.O.A.T.

[@top-person]

Thanks for your cmt

[@rebecalinares5393]

With just 2 Wimbledon Titles (THE most important tournament in tennis, its the World Cup of tennis), Nadal cannot be considered GOAT. Not even top 5. 1. Djokovic 2. Federer / Laver 3. Sampras / Pancho Gonzales 4. Bjorn Borg 5. Bill Tilden

[@dragans1395]

Everyone wants to be the goat, Novak currently is, but only when all three retire will it be clear who is the goat. It is a naive act of Federer and Nadal that they are not interested in being the goat.

[@blackgruya011]

Rafa is a pussy under stereoids, he will never be Novak

[@noelle2see]

Enrique, be quiet.

[@prozac623]

How can you have a list without Lew Hoad, Bill Tilden, Ilie Nastase, Don Budge, or Roy Enerson, but you include Agassi? Everyone on this list was a great player, but we're talking greatest.

[@top-person]

Thanks for cmt sorry about this.

[@prozac623]

@@top-person No worries, Its all subjective. We just disagree as to who would make the list. But thank you for replying.

[@mobystwin]

Because Hoad, Tilden,and Don Budge never played open tennis with the level of competition after 1968. Nastase is like Kyrgios today. Crazy talented but not enough work ethic to have it translate into results. Roy Emerson won most of the grand slam tournaments in Australia with limited competition in those days.

[@SpanksDBL9]

You talk like happy Gilmore

[@pedropelaez]

Wimbledon open? 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@top-person]

Thanks for cmt

[@noelle2see]

@@top-person Still wrong. Plus you mispronounced Lendls' name.

[@top-person]

Thanks for cmt. I will do of my best for next videos. 🙏

[@loloforge2841]

Djokovic vs Rafa (30-29), but, but Rafa is 5-4 in Grand slam Finals, sooooooo. Who's your daddy? Rafa vs Federer (24-16) respectively. In grand slam finals Rafa 6 wins Federer 3. Who's your daddy? At the end of the day we are fans to some payer more than others. My favorite has been Pistol Pete and if he was on this era he would have won more than 14 and the big three won't be able to win as many, but that doesn't mean that Pete would have been the greatest. For now I'd say let's wait until Rafa is DONE and Novak is DONE then we can wrap the argument,

[@loloforge2841]

I'll take it a step further (This is not Bias but real data). Rafa has beaten Novak in Hard court in 2 of the 5 grand slam finals (that's 40% in hard court). Rafa has beaten Roger in Grass Finals. But who of those two (Roger and Novak) has beaten Rafa at the Finals of Roland Garros (Clay)? ZERO is the answer.!

[@Thomas-bo5mv]

dickriding nadal fans how can he be the greatest when he has literally 8 titles for 3 GS combined. Novak and Federer have more variety, more titles and more versatility. Nadal abused steroids and got god gifted with some of the luckiest runs in GS history. Novak will end up surpassing Nadal’s record in Grand Slams and the karma will be on you. Nadal is also the most unsupportive and suspicious of all three, refusing tennis dopingpassport, losing in second rounds of Grand Slams. The most complete player is djokovic and the most talented is federer. Without clay he would not even be in the top three.

[@loloforge2841]

@@Thomas-bo5mv so Tommy, where in the record books or the ATP rules say anything about grand slams combined? Or is another sentimental cry out? Whoever wins the most grand slams has the greater chances to be the GOAT. If it is Novak, good for him as he’s a great player. I have no issues there, but if he doesn’t win the most slams and it turns out to be Rafa then it will be Rafa the GOAT. Another thing that I hope you didn’t see on my stats above. Rafa has beaten Novak more times in Grand slam finals than what Novak has beaten Rafa. That record is 5-4 advantage Rafa. Two (2) of those 5 victories have been in hard courts. So if you talk about balancing how many finals has Novak beaten Rafa on clay? The answer is zero. As for Federer that train left that station. Only time will tell. So far Rafa is the goat in my view. But Novak can catch him for sure and be the goat. I think we can revise this conversation in 2-3 years. Before any of this happened Pistol Pete was the goat. But he won 7 Wimbledon and zero French. But Pete ALWAYS beat his adversaries more time than what he was beaten in grand slam finals and ALSO ended his career with more slams than anyone. As I said we can revise this conversation in 2-3 years.

[@saula8948]

That daddy Nadal hasn't beaten Novak off clay in 9 years . All they do is play on clay so of course Nadal will keep it close . Nadal has spent like 164 weeks at number 1 less than Novak , 2 years ending as number 1 less . No WTF . Didn't win all the masters . Was lucky that Novak was deported from Australia or Novak would have smoked him there in the QF . Novak was banned from the US and Nadal got clapped by Francis I guess even the government couldn't help him this time . The only way Nadal will end above Novak in slams is if Novak continues to be banned from slams , must feel great that for Nadal to be the GOAT Novak can't compete .

[@dnail1917]

Stop this BS please. Rafael Claydal didnt take a set from Djokovic on hard court since 2013, and didnt beat him on grass since 2008. Novak is better overall player and its the fact, GS finals and GS h2h is irrelevant because 10 GS matches were played on clay, because Nadal wasnt good enough to make a deep run at AO or Wimbledon. Djokovic owns both Federer and Nadal, he is their father, and they are his sons. He owns them and he proved it many times.

[@michelez715]

Your English is appalling! "He born on..." just one example.

[@top-person]

Thanks for cmt

[@borisbalta2542]

Laver better then Sampras.Maybe in dreams.

[@top-person]

thanks for your comment. i will make other video soon about tennis. will try my best

[@davidavila3994]

I do not think so Sampras much better

[@rebecalinares5393]

you never watched Rod Laver.

[@borisbalta2542]

@@rebecalinares5393 😅

[@hehehehehahahaha2025]

It''s not that easy and clear-cut when comparing players from vastly different eras. Sampras is my favourite player but it's a lot harder to even find footage of a prime Laver, so you have to rely more on stats but then have to take into account his lack of access to GS tournaments etc.

[@charlesfleming7281]

You need to learh the English language.

[@top-person]

Thanks for cmt

[@quasar4601]

Be nice , his English is very good 👍

[@tennis-man1902]

Nadal>>>>>> Djokovic😊