Better gear won't make you a better photographer. We're already well past the point of diminishing returns and into the overkill zone. In any case, if you're relying on tech to improve your images, then no camera or lens will make a difference. Better to look for a rig that gives you more flexibility/portability. I'd recommend Micro Four Thirds format, as you'll be able to carry a wide range of small/light lenses to places you'd never want to haul larger-format gear (my go-to is the Lumix G9M2). If you really want to go light and fast, a 1" bridge camera (e.g., Lumix FZ1000 or Sony RX-10) will give you more IQ than you need to produce gallery-worthy prints under most conditions.
@dng88Күн бұрын
Quite true but Not for focusing. Hence whilst z50ii use the 5 year old sensor still have a chance, not sure about z80.
@ddsdss256Күн бұрын
@@dng88 I get it, but had no auto anything (including focusing) from the '70s until I finally went digital roughly two decades ago. My G9M2 has a great 779-point PD plus DFD hybrid focusing system with all kinds of auto detect functionality, plus 8 stops of IBIS, up to 60 FPS with 1.5s pre-burst and AF/AE (75 FPS with fixed focus/exp), 5.8K Open Gate and 240 FPS 4K video, up to 100MP with pixel shift, and a bunch of other ridiculously sophisticated tech, but I don't use most of it, even sometimes preferring manual focus (with peaking, as my eyes aren't as good as they used to be). My point is that even mid-range cameras several years old are more capable than US$6K+ flagships from a few years prior (lenses are way more important than bodies anyway). Either way, a great photographer can get better shots from a Holga than a newbie with a Phase One. Too much emphasis on tech is not improving the real state of the ART.
@abhishekpurkayastha120 сағат бұрын
U forgot to mention DJI. They are going to join the game as well
@gerasimosioardanitis5494Күн бұрын
leaving out of the list the Sony FX3 Mark II .... big miss...