That's right. I don't think Jim Bede ever envisioned a jet-powered version of his design. That was done later by others. The original aircraft was intended to operate with an inexpensive 40-horsepower piston engine to keep the overall cost very low, so a small turbofan or turbojet would have been out of the question.
@Skamanda7 жыл бұрын
Are you not familiar with the dismal safety record of the BD-5, even after they increased the wingspan? The Pitts is a decent airplane, but the BD-5 is a widowmaker.
@claudegrosjean89967 жыл бұрын
Bill Karoly airbus a 34o
@peterzion20147 жыл бұрын
Jim Bede chose to take customer money for his 5000$ kits to develop the jet, hoping to get rich with the US military buying the jet for a much cheaper jet fighter trainer. He even sent out nice newsletters to my Dad who was so excited to finally build his own aerobatic airplane. When the US military branches rejected the BD5 Jet, Jim Bede filed bankruptcy and certainly never delivered the purchased BD5 kits! My Dad was so very disappointed! He never got an airplane.
@waynewaddell24306 жыл бұрын
Original aircraft kit sold for 2695 dollars, back in 1972, featured in popular mechanics, (cover) in that year eronca re introduced the champ factory built for $4995.00 two seats tandem ragwing
@KRAZEEIZATION4 жыл бұрын
The Bumble Bee is in Pima Air and Space Museum in Tucson! I saw it there in 2013.
@kenhorner68367 жыл бұрын
Really nice compilation
@drampadreg13867 жыл бұрын
I always liked the auto gyros, my favourite being the xeon executive with it's luxurious interior and options plus with a 140 hp Rotax it cruses at around 125mph and it's actually cheaper to fly than it's less expensive models with smaller engines. But I like them all because they have a zero stall speed and they like bad weather. It's also pretty easy to make your own.
@brandonoyler7603 жыл бұрын
I remember seeing the Bumble Bee as a kid and in a museum
@GregoryTheGr8ster7 жыл бұрын
I have always been fascinated by mini aircraft. When I heard about ultralights in the early 80s, I wanted one sooo bad.
@chrisblake19187 жыл бұрын
That Bumblebee is AWESOME!!!!!!!
@doranjaffas96457 жыл бұрын
The silver bullet jet is a Bede . I've seen the Bumble Bee up close. Also the Cri Cri also known as Dee Cricket.
@BillAnt5 жыл бұрын
At 4:00 the 'Cri-Cri" ... you'll Cry when you see its price tag, and Cry again when you crash it. lol
@umaryes44735 жыл бұрын
What about the bede?
@BillAnt5 жыл бұрын
@Sauft Umar < Oh you mean the Be-Dead lol
@umaryes44735 жыл бұрын
@@BillAnt 😂 damn dude chill
@everybodybeguccified5754 жыл бұрын
It’s not that expensive
@z32458617 жыл бұрын
I always had a fascination with BD-5's and the Benson gyrocopters.
@seanmchugh84427 жыл бұрын
Just from the photo I was going to comment that the Bumble Bee looks like a purpose-built deathtrap. The video's commentary confirms it.
@BuceGar7 жыл бұрын
Good list.
@diGritz17 жыл бұрын
The Goblin is sitting at the Dayton Air force Museum. Very cool little aircraft.
@1950harleycharley6 жыл бұрын
Love your videos....Tech Planet!
@Bloodgod406 жыл бұрын
IIRC the Bumble Bee was named because it looks like its wings are too small to fly with. (There's an urban myth that a bumble bee's wings are scientifically too small to fly but it flies anyway.) When you actually look at it though, it's a biplane, so imagine it as a monoplane with wings twice as long... and as well as that, its wings are broad (front to back) so it actually has a lot more wing area than it looks like. Still, I bet it takes a helluva takeoff run to get up.
@clecopliers70117 жыл бұрын
I was actually in on the build of a BD5 in Canada circa 1971. A company still in business had the dealership. The only difference was we constructed the aircraft using solid rivets vs pop rivets that the plans called for. The project was never completed and was sold to a private concern.
@jacobaubertin6457 жыл бұрын
You are the most Canadian Canadian that ever Canadianed. lol
@nicholasproietto25004 жыл бұрын
That Lewis and Clark BD-5 jet came to our airport for our yearly airshow several years back. Very small jet. The pilot was a very nice man. I talked with him for a good while.
@withastickangrywhiteman28225 жыл бұрын
4:58, that one had fly across English channel in 2019. so it has proved to be reliable
@ynotski97 жыл бұрын
No 1 BeBe Jet was used in James Bond 007 - For Your Eyes Only 1981.
@ShawnD10277 жыл бұрын
"Bede," as in Jim Bede.
@christopherweedon69447 жыл бұрын
Much like the word ‘sheep,’ the term “aircraft” builds its plural without an -s. The etymology of ‘aircraft’ is not derived from an old word, but it does have a documented (modern) convention. It is because craft is a collective term and Old English Dictionary (OED) mentions that it might be originated as an elliptical expression (that includes nautical vessels). ‘Craft’ itself is used as ‘aircraft’ as well. OED includes the following explanation for the fifth definition of “craft”: V. Applied to boats, ships, and fishing requisites. These uses were probably colloquial with watermen, fishers, and seamen some time before they appeared in print, so that the history is not evidenced; but the expression is probably elliptical. The want in English of any general collective term for all sorts of ‘vessels for water carriage’ naturally made ‘craft’ a useful stop-gap term. For reference [OED]: ‘Craft’ Sense 9. a. collect. (const. as pl.) Vessels or boats. (a) originally only in small craft n. (b) Hence, without small, in same sense; later, in the general sense of vessels of all kinds for water carriage and transport. b. (with a and pl.) A small vessel or boat; any sailing or floating vessel. c. An aircraft or spacecraft. Sense 10. a. collect. Implements used in catching or killing fish; in mod. use chiefly in whale-fishery. ‘Craft’, is a nautical (sea going) word signifying all manner of lines, nets, hooks, &c. which serve for fishing; and because those that use the fishing trade use small vessels, they call all such little vessels ‘small craft’. The harpoons, hand-lances, and boat-spades, are usually called ‘craft’, and the other implements ‘gear’. However, OED mentions that the plural form ‘aircrafts’ is rare and there is one citation where ‘aircrafts’ is used: HIS WORLD-FAMED AIRCRAFTS 1903 Aeronautical Journal 7 81/1 OED also adds that the word can be understood, especially when used in the plural, to include other kinds of heavier-than-air machine, such as helicopters. The word was/in often preferred to the term ‘aeroplane’ or ‘airplane’ in official and military contexts. Ref. this military correspondence directive from WWII: Will you please make the following terminology effective in all British official correspondence: For ‘aeroplane’ the word ‘aircraft’ should be used. 1943 W. S. Churchill Telegram 15 June in Second World War (1952) V. 566
@q300SBB6 жыл бұрын
Christopher Weedon correct. That bugged me to.
@lawrencegenereux85674 жыл бұрын
@@q300SBB If he said "aircrafts" one more time, I was gonna' take a hostage.
@MarkMcCluney7 жыл бұрын
Enjoyed that mate, thanks for sharing.
@Tech_Planet7 жыл бұрын
Thanks for returning and watching again!
@gusjackson36587 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this, good man.
@0105dimas7 жыл бұрын
finally not clickbait
@Gunner16417 жыл бұрын
*Talks about how some Japanese creators made the Gen H-4* "But I'm sure someone will copy this build and make their own KAMIKAZE machine" *TRIGGERED*
@jonskowitz7 жыл бұрын
Just looking at it I'm guessing that the Bumblebee had the same sort of longitudinal instability that plagued the X85 Goblin
@darrellcook82536 жыл бұрын
I once built a model of the bumblebee and it flew best on its side about a 45 degree angle. Seemed to want to bite itself in the tail. Didn't have any problems landing though it still had the wiggles.
@craigwall95364 жыл бұрын
@@darrellcook8253 Maybe it just needs a co-axial contra-rotating pair of props. lol
@JFrazer4303 Жыл бұрын
The Goblin flew just fine. Easy to handle, nimble, with exceptionally easy stall characteristics. Its only problem was docking with the mothership.
@jamieclumpas85457 жыл бұрын
2:40 lol. That's not what traffic monitoring is.
@MangionMotorsports4 жыл бұрын
Congrats, you missed the joke
@Tigerskunk7 жыл бұрын
I think I still have a RC modeler magazine that showed how to make a RC version of that Bumblebee 2
@Tech_Planet7 жыл бұрын
Cool, it would probably be the same size lol
@dewedg27527 жыл бұрын
My F in law used part out airplanes. One he had was a super little plane called Teeny Steeny. It was probably a homebuilt one. But not by him. He was even too afraid to fly it. I've tried to find more info on it. But there isn't anything out there. Wingspan was like 8 feet tops.
@jtuttle117 жыл бұрын
If you want to see a Jet designed by Jim Bede, look up the BD-10.
@alexcacares65477 жыл бұрын
the bumble bee also wins cutest aircraft award
@sim.frischh97817 жыл бұрын
The Cri-Cri is, as far as i know, french and it´s i should be spelled like in "hit", "kick" and "skip" ect. It means "cricket".
@โชคชัยโฟน-ค6ฌ5 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot.
@juliashenandoah39657 жыл бұрын
I´ll take that beautyful Mosquito helicopter, and that futuristic Cavalon gyrocopter please!
@Bearthedancingman4 жыл бұрын
Yeah, people talk about a flying car. That gyro is it right there!
@friedchicken17 жыл бұрын
4:00 I thing it's not pronunced Cry cry but "Cree cree" as in Cricket
@sim.frischh97817 жыл бұрын
Dammit, should have checked about others pointing it out... But wouldn´t the ee be too long? More like "i" in "hit" and such words.
@Cancun7717 жыл бұрын
It's French, so it's pronounced 'Cree-Cree'.
@___Chris___3 жыл бұрын
Johnny Cash: "Cry! Cry! Cry!"
@Juup20037 жыл бұрын
I have actually sat in the smallest propellor aircraft that ever flew
@Ironbuket7 жыл бұрын
Did you noticed how many of these aircraft appeared in James Bond movies?
@denilsson316 жыл бұрын
I flew aerobatics with the awesome Cri-cri.
@dashcostello66677 жыл бұрын
The benson B-8 is like any other gyrocopter.
@JFrazer4303 Жыл бұрын
You missed the '80s "Little Bird" by Milt Hatfield. Based on the '30s Arup from Indiana, like them it was stall-proof with good speed on little power and 45 degree climb.
@frog93346 жыл бұрын
last I saw #5 is at Pima Air and Space Museum in Arizona.
@smokeyjoe72517 жыл бұрын
BD-5J on static display at the Pima Air and Space Museum in Tucson, Arizona was the one James Bond flew in Octopussy.
@angr38195 ай бұрын
Thank you
@johnnykallin307 жыл бұрын
Mosguito XE @ 2:40 "It depends on where you live but there are some variants that do not need a license to fly." And where might that be? I live in one of the highest rated places in the world so if I can take flight licenses and get flight hours elsewhere it's always a win win situation.
@jasongooden9177 жыл бұрын
The price of a supercar so its one of the most affordable jets... That just goes to show you how expensive jets are.
@carmelpule69546 жыл бұрын
At 3:15 I do not think that aircraft is only 5 ft wing span , it looks about 8 feet at least.
@ciananmortem31277 жыл бұрын
Not trying to nitpick here as it was a great video but the word "airship" equates a rigid framed structure. For reference a Rigid Airship has a full frame, a semi-rigid has a partial frame (Bottom is trussed, top is soft) and a blimp is completely devoid of a frame whereas a balloon is, well, a balloon. So the first would be a balloon, or more specifically, a powered balloon alongside a blimp. Like the video a lot.
@brandonashmore86747 жыл бұрын
I thought #1 would be the aircraft ride you see at the entrance of a grocery store the little kiddies go on.
@kaitheviking84687 жыл бұрын
Havent even watched the video yet but challenge freaking acsepted!!!
@jcbraka37717 жыл бұрын
1:28.- I really gotta have one of this!!!
@aeb1barfo7 жыл бұрын
I have a Benson Gyrocopter that the original owner modified and died in. Don't modify things without checking the safety aspects.
@chaytonruijsenaars39716 жыл бұрын
hell i might save up for one of them mini cri cri things, or build one, that looks like alot of fun for cheep
@streamylc4 жыл бұрын
"can only fly over water" vs "is only flown over water"
@logoseven33657 жыл бұрын
Mid air refueling killed the Goblin and all other parasitic fighters. Really cool. The USAF museum has one.
@MrClean4177 жыл бұрын
And not the end of WWII but after Korea. We didn't have B-36's in WWII and America barely had jet engined aircraft none of which seeing action until the Korean war.
@angusgebers53767 жыл бұрын
The traffic in the mosquito helicopter doesn't monitor roads lol. Its ADS-B traffic.
@johnnyj5407 жыл бұрын
I learned to fly on a Benson B-8 that my dad and I built in the early '70s.
@craigwall95364 жыл бұрын
You learned to fly it but you didn't learn how to spell it?
@gefnaut1176 жыл бұрын
I’ve seen cri cri take off from the top of a Ford Explorer lol
@toadman5064 жыл бұрын
"Traffic Monitoring" in the Aviation world has ZIP to do with Road Traffic/Traffic Jams.
@doranjaffas96457 жыл бұрын
To all of you writing snobbery about his narrating vocabulary...take a breath. Enjoy the video and quiet down.
@southpark55557 жыл бұрын
Bumble Bee 2 is otherwise known as Death Wish 2.
@thomasolver89427 жыл бұрын
Gotta have a big set!!
@Rodolfo-zd6wv6 жыл бұрын
and the the tiny micro jet
@peanuts21057 жыл бұрын
This dude sounds like he narrates the "Honey Badger" video. Such a badass.
@kainicholson67997 жыл бұрын
2:36 Haha no they mean Air Traffic. Unless the actually do mean road traffic but that would be fucking useless
@ebc41sp7 жыл бұрын
But why U forgot about paragliders? Especially powered paragliders (PPGs) if you are focused on motorized flights.
@Famous-Potatoes4 жыл бұрын
The plural of aircraft is . . . . aircraft.
@bliglum7 жыл бұрын
Doubt that "Flyboard air" has 1000 hp as stated.. Probably 4 hobby grade turbines, so maybe about 100 hp.
@thishandlehas3ormorecharacters7 жыл бұрын
I also doubt that it "only flies over water"...
@denbecr497 жыл бұрын
Adam Odlund Probably meant only certified safe to fly over water.
@1crzflyer7 жыл бұрын
it only flies over water because if the pilot falls off he won't die.
@kylethompson24316 жыл бұрын
bliglum each of the engines are 250hp, 250 • 4 = 1000
@joshhayl74596 жыл бұрын
To: Jim Blalock, The Flyboard has a pair of boots very much like ski-boots that are bolted to it and the pilot secures himself into those boots, so he cannot "Fall off".
@kennethwalker67307 жыл бұрын
What about the Valkyri smallest Private aircraft or the USFleetTracking FLS Microjet
@jpatt10007 жыл бұрын
If this is a top ten list, why doesn't it go from small to smallest? And why were the Stits Baby Bird and Sky Baby left out? They should have been grouped near the Bumblebee. That said, the Leopard is one nice looking plane that sounds like it had some good numbers backing it up. It's a wonder it didn't make it to production.
@joseveintegenario-nisu19283 жыл бұрын
Would a Triplane version of 'Bumble Bee', 249 cm wingspan, be able to takeoff and land at 'regular' speeds, and be allowed to run on roads? Blessings +
@ВладимирБаскаков-с5м7 жыл бұрын
#2 Flyboard Air - it's a prototype of the Green Goblin's Glider!!!
@zkxrpyun7 жыл бұрын
Number 8 can also be named BB-8 ;)
@TMB2475 жыл бұрын
Benson B-8... you said you would get back to it ... where did I miss that? It is the most affordable, safest etc on your list
@LightRealms7 жыл бұрын
2:51 for those of you who came for the thumbnail
@davecrupel28176 жыл бұрын
That Goblin literaly looks like a chopped off Sabre nose...
@rushthezeppelin7 жыл бұрын
Holy shit the clickbait was actually in the video!!
@Rodolfo-zd6wv6 жыл бұрын
I NEED THAT GOBLIN
@tonk92467 жыл бұрын
lol bumble bee is always cute :3
@bitemykrank19707 жыл бұрын
The ubiquitous Bede BD-5J......the ONLY aircraft in this list PROVEN to fit UP a horse's ass........Thanks Q !!
@jeffmullinix79164 жыл бұрын
One of my brother friend died in a DB-5 in an Air race . Mechanical
@panzerabwerkanone7 жыл бұрын
Hmm no Burt Rutan designs? How about the Quicke? At least it was in production unlike half of your selections that are one-off prototypes.
@bugoobiga6 жыл бұрын
too cute - if Hello Kitty had a jet 3:27
@HarukaChan24684 жыл бұрын
WHERE’S THE STRIKER UNIT IN THIS VIDEO???
@charliebrown46247 жыл бұрын
You forgot to mention the Ligetti Stratos.
@jax19647 жыл бұрын
JD Rock. The plural for "aircraft" is "aircraft", not "aircrafts". Just saying FYI. Otherwise enjoyed your video.
@odomobo7 жыл бұрын
I feel like paramotors should have been featured on here somehow
@davecc00007 жыл бұрын
Eric the half-a-bee!
@martincallingham57857 жыл бұрын
davecc0000 LP LP
@blemp37885 жыл бұрын
Portotype?
@holtg0077 жыл бұрын
French Cri Cri (Pronounced Cre - Cre)
@brianbickley32367 жыл бұрын
Adult
@belliott5386 жыл бұрын
I submit the BD-10 as more impressive than the BD-5...
@owendominguez72167 жыл бұрын
I've seen the tiny bumble bee in the AZ air and space museum
@gbrown37837 жыл бұрын
Owen Dominguez me to I live like 30 mins from there
@denbecr497 жыл бұрын
There's one very similar in the Henry Ford museum in Dearborn, MI.
@harrycarlson51447 жыл бұрын
Blog Tities
@harrycarlson51447 жыл бұрын
Let’s see some big tites
@sandyhutton9106 жыл бұрын
it's not a Cry-cry.... say Cree-Cree and you'll be closer to the mark. It's Cricket!
@kkfoto7 жыл бұрын
# 3 should be pronounced "cree-cree" (aka Cricket), not "cry-cry"
@rafagonera32145 жыл бұрын
Ohh i google in some blue plans but i stuck . it would be nice to have some link pdf to print it .
@zanda6777 жыл бұрын
I have just restored the CMC Leopard G-BKRL You can find the restoration on Facebook CMC LEOPARD RESTORATION G-BKRL
@DanFrederiksen7 жыл бұрын
It can be done much better than the Bede. They all make the mistake is sitting upright. Recline the seat and you have a much more lean craft. Outboard engines also simplify the construction. A jet engine is also super simple so the right mass production and it's dirt cheap. Aviation has missed out enormously.
@Milosz_Ostrow7 жыл бұрын
The pilot in the BD-5 is in a semi-reclining position, not upright.
@ShawnD10277 жыл бұрын
"Outboard" as in further out on the wings? You need multiple engines and you also run into adverse yaw in engine-out.
@DanFrederiksen7 жыл бұрын
That seems to be insignificant. Maybe 10% reduction in height from straight upright which no one ever uses anyway.
@DanFrederiksen7 жыл бұрын
Shawn, no I just mean outside the body. Two on the side of the body rear might be good.
@ShawnD10277 жыл бұрын
Ah, then you mean "podded." The overwhelming majority of commercial aircraft with jet engines have them podded, as was the CMC Leopard here. It's not practical in most cases to use a single podded engine, as you must then go to twin tails, creating a complexity spiral.
@HBetweenBrackets7 жыл бұрын
It would be cool if the XF-85 goblin was in war thunder
@n.b.p97867 жыл бұрын
It would probally suck tho
@brertt83507 жыл бұрын
N.B. P it's like the kokibri
@brianbickley32367 жыл бұрын
N.B. P 9 6b b. .
@n.b.p97867 жыл бұрын
many for the april fools event
@njsullyalex27447 жыл бұрын
If only as a joke airplane I think it would be fun to have for sure :)
@humanmusic4 жыл бұрын
*not listed in order of size.
@yakacm6 жыл бұрын
The Goblin was designed during WW2, err no it wasn't, these aircrafts weren't even thought about until the B-36 was in service and the B-36 didn't fly until after the war, thou they did start designing the B-36 during the war as they needed aircrafts that could bomb Jerry from the US in case Britain, or airstrip 1 as it was know during WW2, fell and then they couldn't flies their aircafts no more, from Britains.