TOP CUSTOM CARDS OF THE WEEK #39 | Card Review | Hearthstone

[@RealClassixX]

“Battlecry: Die.“ I love it.

[@quinnginbey3254]

Deathrattle: Cease to live

[@Darkxification]

Slide that into a shudderwock deck

[@baldawen]

Battlecry: Commit not feel so good

[@whYLiE09]

That card was stupid

[@Jeninja]

@@whYLiE09 It was the only card that I could see actually being printed. It was clever, and well balanced imo

[@Wells13555]

that "balance one star" edit legitimately made me jump back in my seat

[@MothafuckinAmerica]

Truly frightening

[@AkosSam]

Your spells cost (3) less You can't play spells Ha! Got you Trump!

[@gabrielragum]

Your spells cost (3) less Battlecry: Die

[@evoli5060]

@@gabrielragum but still good in ressurect priest LUL

[@berndarndt9924]

@@evoli5060 To bad it is still a mage card.

[@nirast2561]

Your spells *that deal damage* cost (3) less.

[@berndarndt9924]

@@nirast2561 it still deals infinite dmg with 1Sorcerer and Archmage.

[@typhoonlagoon4031]

I love how Trump hypes up a cool idea then hits it with the "There's a problem, 2 stars".

[@MoarCheeseBirb]

These are more fun than the real card reviews.

[@calixthenustv6739]

Agreed

[@janterri3539]

Probably because most of them aren’t practical

[@gavinwightman4038]

Some are actually cool and use old and new effects in ways that blizzard never would.

[@CL-jq1xs]

Well because they are funny especially the op cards

[@Falonefal]

Someone should set up a non-competitive (aka, mostly just for fun and ridiculousness) game on Steam that has a workshop where people can submit their own card ideas and then the devs just add cards they like from the most upvoted cards every month or so. This way you'll basically have a 'reddit' card game.

[@Krelos1114]

0:54 i'd be fun to make it an instant "disrupt" effect. "you and your opponent each summon a random minion from your respective hands and give them +2/+2 and taunt" Maybe knock the mana cost up a bit.

[@Krelos1114]

Yeah, but flavored for warriors.

[@michaelpollard1719]

Cable rat gave the defender classes lackeys though...

[@peterbergeon2526]

but the defender classes have no payoff for lackeys yet ALL classes have big payoff for twin-spell, the neutral lackey card isnt for the good guys, its so all 5 evil classes get lackey cards so you dont need to print 5 redundant cards for each class to make sure they all get lackeys.

[@randomnobody660]

@@peterbergeon2526 it's not a balance problem thou, it's a flavor problem. Regardless of whether defender classes have use for lackeys (and one can argue they are decent stand alone cards), it doesn't make it flavor un-fail.

[@TheSeventhPersona]

Certain Randomness Well, they did say that there will be more villains joining the League of Evil as the year goes on, so it’s possible that the new villains introduced will fit into the defender classes later on. It’s just currently a flavour issue, but maybe not in the future.

[@born2hula325]

Two TINY problems; 1. EVIL rat is the ONLY card that gives lackeys to defenders (so far but probably ever) 2. It’s shit and no one will play it. For all intents and purposes defenders don’t get lackeys. I think the rat just exists to make lackeys more common in arena.

[@SeventhSolar]

The weakness of EVIL Cable Rat does preserve flavor. By being irrelevant except in possibly a hardcore Lackey deck, Cable Rat will never, ever see play in a defender class. In contrast, Magna Aegwynn's would see play indiscriminately.

[@Krelos1114]

4:56 Sylvanas as a villian?!?! Don't you know she is M O R A L L Y G R A Y

[@zachariz1490]

Nouj gray is just a way to say she's bad, but she can do something good sometimes. Still a banshee at heart

[@brandaccountname9833]

She’s morally gay

[@certifiedpossum8655]

She's also physically grey.

[@juangrille1310]

@@brandaccountname9833 After everything she has done lately that... Has some room for discussion.

[@Willowisp927]

3 years later and you kiddos should know that every hero is a villain in another point of view.

[@PirateFrog.]

Sylvanas isn't a villain you goose she's "Morally gray"

[@ArmorFrogEntertainment]

good meme... from like 5 months ago

[@canaldecasta]

She is hot for sure

[@ArmorFrogEntertainment]

@@canaldecasta I prefer my women with, you know, a pulse and body heat

[@blahthebiste7924]

To each their own

[@funnynin5140]

shes also actually gray

[@tunakx]

Magna could be crazy with shadowstep and sinister strike. Just keep on playing her and your oppenent will die eventually.

[@schippes24]

Not really as long as the twinspell effect works properly. Spells that were generated with twinspell can't have twinspell on them, otherwise it would be some sort of echo.

[@tunakx]

@@schippes24 I don't think there is a restriction about that because spells are not generated.There is no animation of them getting added to your hand.In fact they even keep their location in hand.But if Blizzard confirmed it,RIP infinite damage Rogue.

[@OnEiNsAnEmOtHeRfUcKa]

Actually, you're _both_ wrong. The copies generated by Twinspell WOULD in this case get Twinspell, because they're being enchanted with the effect by another card effect - and, when you play a card with Twinspell it DOES generate a copy without Twinspell, and there is a little animation.

[@tunakx]

@@OnEiNsAnEmOtHeRfUcKa I didn't say there wasn't an animation.I just sayed there wasn't an animation of the card being added.Like in blink fox,babbling book,jeweled macaw...

[@born2hula325]

Yeah, this would work. You go magna, prep, eviscerate, shadowstep. You’d be left with magna, eviscerate, prep and shadow step in your hand with no text. Just play magna and repeat forever. Bonus points if you have 2x eviscerate, 2x prep, 2 x sinister strike.

[@andrewrenshaw2741]

Butterfly could have a beginning of turn effects (like a gust of wind that gets stronger each turn, shaking the board a little ) until turn 9 where a giant tornado wipes everything out. A visual build up.

[@ImSimmin]

"your spells cost 3 less, you cannot play spells this turn"

[@pigmanpiggypiggyman3732]

Always a lil bothered when trump says things are impossible. In particular, a turn counter is totally doable - we had something as 'meta' as the way C'Thun functions

[@1998marijn1998]

Dormant would be the best solution as he mentions, but the card didn't mention anything like it so therefore bad design.

[@Corrupted]

How to make double Agent cool: 4 Mana Stealth 2/3 At the end of your turn, deal 2 (3) damage to both heroes. Could be some stealth pressure for midrange or aggro rogue

[@abcPIPPO95]

A minion with stealth that deals constant safe damage without breaking stealth is unhealthy. Not every deck can deal with stealth minions.

[@Corrupted]

@@abcPIPPO95 but is 2 damage a turn really that dangerous?

[@dreambrother16]

@@Corrupted 2 damage a turn per one of these you get out and they all have permanent stealth? Yes of course it is dangerous.

[@abcPIPPO95]

@@Corrupted Absolutely. That's a free hunter's hero power. Over 4 turns that's already 8 damage, almost one third of the enemy health. And with rogue, who already has one of the highest reach in the entire game, if not the highest.

[@Corrupted]

@@abcPIPPO95 5 Mana 2/3 - stealth, 2 a turn could work then, maybe?

[@thatboy8107]

Wrong about the twinspell thing, theres neutral cards that generate lackeys

[@mansnilsson3219]

Correct, but we've not yet seen a neutral twinspell, because there are no neutral spells.

[@CabbageYe]

@@mansnilsson3219 rafaam

[@mansnilsson3219]

@@CabbageYe Sorry?

[@bramseldenthuis1458]

He’s still correct in the sense that it should definitely be a class card.

[@dakota6885]

@@mansnilsson3219 So? Lackeys are supposed to be exclusive to villains just as twinspell is for defenders. If neutral cards can give lackeys, this legendary can give your spells twinspell.

[@TheSpaniard96]

What if the mage card was "Spells that deal damage cost 3 less" and increase the cost to 5?

[@Mouse_Librarian]

Too convoluted.

[@ГенийЖизни-л7ю]

@@Mouse_Librarian Not too convoluted. There are convoluted cards out there and this is not one of them.

[@HighLanderPonyYT]

Could say spells cost 3, instead of 3 less. This way it wouldn't stack, could make it a legendary, too.

[@misterbin00]

@@HighLanderPonyYT You mean something like a 3 cost pyroblast?

[@MidnightBloomDev]

@@misterbin00 3 mana deal 7 isn't op as long as it requires specific minion on board

[@tannertj33]

“Give 2-2 and taunt to the next minion you and your opponent play until your next turn”

[@smely9082]

Tanner Clifford *to the first minions

[@Korinengamecorp]

@@smely9082 That's it chief

[@gabriellarena2256]

why not just have it say "give a minion in your and your opponent hand 2-2 and taunt"

[@smely9082]

Gabriel Larena because rng makes it terrible. not getting to choose what minion u want buffed can ruin ur line of play.

[@born2hula325]

“give an enemy minion +2/+2 and taunt. The next minion you play this turn has +2/+2 and taunt”. No floating effect and the buff it needs because you get to choose which minion it hits.

[@Iso_Varvas]

Double agent might be better as "Whenever a card is played, deal 2 damage to a random hero" EDIT: Of course Rafaam is in his own adress book, to remember his own number

[@MrFox-xr9cc]

I don't see the problem with "keeping track" of effects that other people do. It also worked with C'Thun.

[@gamerboy2003]

C thun reminds you every single turn, is something that the entire expansion is based off of, and reminds you of its existence constantly. Imagine printing the butterfly card and having a COMMON CARD show up eight times on the side, bonus points if it gets played more than once and there’s like 4 butterflies that just block the screen every turn. It’s just not worth the hassle.

[@MrFox-xr9cc]

@@gamerboy2003 Well there are many possibilities to do such a countert thing. We've seen a lot of counters so far

[@robertlupa8273]

@@MrFox-xr9cc Charming Butterfly flies into a bar. There is no counter (for it's effect).

[@ГенийЖизни-л7ю]

@@gamerboy2003 you are just too dumb to think of anything.

[@digiquo8143]

Have a small butterfly fluttering around the hero that played it with a countdown on it's back. There, problem solved.

[@isaact.snyder5389]

ALSO magna is broken as neutral with Rogue too because shadow step magna is an infinite loop

[@charliefu2854]

Double Agent might be better served as an vancleef- style combo where it does 2 damage to each player for each card played before it

[@captainglad4966]

Discover a villain and one of the cards you can discover is Millhouse Manastorm also the charming butterfly should be a deathrattle

[@maxwellwallace7760]

It should be a battlecry. The saying goes when a butterfly flaps its wings, which one can only do when alive

[@captainglad4966]

@@maxwellwallace7760 oh interesting I never heard that saying, I just know about the butterfly effect. Since the typical example is that even a killing a butterfly could have a major impact as time goes on. But according to what you say I agree with you.

[@emikochan13]

@@captainglad4966 no the typical example is "a butterfly flapping it's wings on one side of the planet could cause a hurricane on the other"

[@captainglad4966]

@@emikochan13 I prefer killing them

[@warptens5652]

Your spells cost (3) less Whenever you cast a spell, take 5 damage Or Whenever you cast a spell, discard a card Or Whenever you cast a spell, deal 2 damage to all friendly characters Or Whenever you cast a spell for (0), silence this minion Or Your turn ends when you cast a spell

[@ninjashoe2158]

I would do "Whenever you cast a spell for (0), silence this minion"

[@kiloneie]

Discard wouldn't work with Antonidas because you cast fireball, discard a card or none, gain fireball, cast fireball, discard nothing, gain fireball etc...

[@schippes24]

To be honest, when you think of the power aegwynn had and her impact on azeroth, it's fair that she has the tendency to be OP if you don't play her "fair"

[@Preaplanes]

4 mana 3/3 mage minion. Spell Power -3. Your spells cost 3 less. At the end of your turn, your hero is destroyed.

[@wugsessed]

Magna Aegwynn - Battlecry: If your deck has no duplicates, give all spells in your *deck* Twinspell. -- and then buff the stats, or maybe even more aggressive costing.

[@oom-3262]

"Given how laughable fiendish circle and rafaam's scheme are..." *Every wild darkest hour player disliked that*

[@qpid-sama8543]

I like how the dots on Trumps face line up almost perfectly.

[@Solrex_the_Sun_King]

Could you make a 3rd star category called flavor? As in, making a really thematic card for the effect would be 5 stars, and having the effect have no correlation to the art and name would be 1 star.

[@johnj4471]

There is a way to show both on the next. There's already a card that say's "the next" that shows it on all of your cards: Preparation. Basically make all the minions show as buffed until one is played.

[@louis-etiennemessier7623]

John J it is only for this turn....

[@Junebug89]

I like that you're still doing this during reveal season this time around. The custom cards feel a bit more relevant and we won't have that weird catch up season.

[@breadknot4590]

13:25 4 Mana 2/8 Taunt, your spells cost 3 less, after you cast a spell destroy this minion. A there it says your spells cost 3 less and it's balanced, your move Trump.

[@Riganotza]

"Your spells cost 3 less" might work in specific classes, like, say, Paladin?

[@fokusonvideo]

10:40 when you‘re playing this on the later *spits on table*

[@SeisoYabai]

Bloodweed, 4 mana 3/3 (Warlock) Your spells cost (3) less. Whenever you cast a spell, your Hero takes 3 damage.

[@trauntualafigghtetr6209]

ya gotta also put the spell damage -3 i think

[@crusadax3405]

@@trauntualafigghtetr6209 Why? This card is already awful with most, if not all, damage dealing warlock spells.

[@cblancha1187]

And In This Corner could say, "The First Minion you and your Opponent play gains +2 / +2 and Taunt. Effect Persists until your Next Turn", and then maintain a aura effect around the board, similar to priest's "Your healing does damage instead" cards.

[@randomguy8461]

0:25 just make it so your and your opponent's screen is dark except for a spotlight that's aimed on your and your opponent's hand which exists until a minion is played from that side.

[@benjibrowne]

I feel like the double agent should be legendary as being able to run it two times seems two much

[@RiverM8rix]

I feel like since Fair Duel is a permanent cost drop of your hero power, applying it twice would mean a (0) cost hero power for the cost of upgrading your opponent’s hero power once. Which would be a problem in Wild Gatling Gun Priest, because they would have access to Shadow Visions

[@ImaginaryMdA]

I feel like Magna Aegwynn could be a start of game effect. (Probably with some extra restrictions.)

[@Flailmorpho]

I feel like "AND IN THIS CORNER" might work as like, a warrior secret. Maybe warrior secrets could all be symetrical effects

[@superbaas8822]

Legendary mage minion. 7 mana 5/8 Increase the cost of spells by 1 this turn each time you cast a spell. Your spells costs 3 less.

[@oxstr8upgreekxo730]

To take on the challenge of reducing the spell cost on a minion. 1 mana 1/1 Spells cost (3) less for both players cant be targeted by spells

[@spike333s3]

9:35 Fair Duel's both effect... I guess... -Upgrade your hero power and it cost (1) -Opponent has no effect. (Since it was "Oppoent has no upgrade" or "No cost reduce")

[@MiniDohrok]

On "Fair Duel", since it's an even card you could have BOTH upgrades on wild, you'd just choose "Upgrade you Hero Power" and now you have a 1 cost lvl 2 Hero Power.

[@mrsKaTx]

If you play that last card with auctioneer you could get such a busted miracle Mage deck

[@dnlkr]

I have an idea to identify the floating "the next thing" effect. A blue or red glow perhaps. Green is playable, yellow is special effect, blue is "next minion/spell" type effects?

[@legochickenguy4938]

For Magna Aegwynn I feel like the card would be less prone to broken stuff if you 1) make it a mage card and 2) make its effect a static effect rather than a battlecry, so when it dies the effect is gone

[@Kandall05161]

Fair duel could potentially be saved until both players have played their hero card, and then the "Your hero power costs 1" effect triggers but the upgrade effect doesn't, since only basic hero powers are upgradeable.

[@CuriousMoth]

Fair Duel feels like it should be a battlecry on a big legendary minion, possibly a worgen so the effect flips each turn.

[@justinz9225]

Transmuter in training: Make it "for the rest of the game, your spell damage = 0" Butterfly: Not gonna work, but I am surprised we haven't seen minions that lose health each turn, which also have some kind of interesting deathrattle effect. It could lead to situations where your opponent tries to heal your minion to keep it alive. Maybe "Can't Attack. Lose 1 health per turn. Deathrattle: destroy 2 enemy minions".

[@kuro13wolf]

Certain Eggs and Spider Bombs would like to have a word with you.

[@justinz9225]

@@kuro13wolf Those cards don't do what I'm describing. That's just deathrattle kill a minion. I'm talking about a high-health minion with a large effect over time. Imagine Imp Master with a deathrattle.

[@kaeldeath]

@@kuro13wolf But the eggs don't have the "can't attack" effect, this changes stuff a bit, but the problem is, you can still buff it with taunt or use a deathrattle trigger effect on them, so I think the incentive to keeping them alive (as the opponent) would be really hard to reach.

[@kuro13wolf]

​@@justinz9225 All I'm saying is if you print a card with a really strong Deathrattle you better make sure you can't cheat the Deathrattle out with activators, like Spider Bomb and Eggs have shown.

[@justinz9225]

@@kuro13wolf Well sure, the heart of the idea is that the deathrattle only activates when the timer ticks down. Not sure how the wording would need to go, precisely speaking. Maybe immune? Or untargetable? Essentially, a set of cards that only dies naturally after a certain set of turns. Or maybe "if this card dies due to this effect".

[@Lesterberne]

What if genn and baku received the fair duel treatment mmm would that be okay? I dunno both those cards weren't healthy for the game anw so prob not worth talking about

[@jayabber7323]

And that would create Odd Pala mirrors with 1 mana Hero Powers. How to turn something unfun into absolute misery

[@amazingleomar6885]

Jay the First actually I don’t think it would work since Justicar trueheart in a Genn deck will upgrade your hero power but it will cost 2 afterwards

[@born2hula325]

The first card could be fixed by making it “give an enemy minion +2/+2 and taunt. The next minion you play this turn has +2/+2 and taunt”. No floating effect and the buff it needs because you get to choose which minion it hits.

[@manadegamer9315]

What if the charming butterfly plays as dormant, like the darkness? It sits for 8 turns and so take a minion slot, chances are the turn count might have to be lowered. Edit: Nm he talked about it... I talked too soon!

[@Jacob-fl1wm]

Why can't there be a new mechanic: 'Channel' where it takes a number of turns to activate? Minions would have to stay alive and the channel could be 2 turns, and spells could be shown aside and only have one channel spell active at a time? It makes them more powerful and also have setbacks

[@manadegamer9315]

@@Jacob-fl1wm The problem with minions having the channel effect is that they'd be the target of hard removal and therefore can only find place in something like a control deck, and since they'd almost never go off they'd have to be strong and then it would just cause a lot of balancing issues. And the reason the probably wouldn't add some kind of spell counter to the board is because they want to keep the UI very simple. I believe the most recent UI change was the addition of quests but they were very big and all legendary cards, also they are there own kind of card. Clearly Blizzard doesn't want to tack on new UI elements just to make a minor effect work.

[@manadegamer9315]

@@Jacob-fl1wm Not to mention it also takes a lot of control away from the player, the closest we have is the play when drawn spells but the entire point is it works with the randomness of the draw and the player can still have some control over them.

[@Jacob-fl1wm]

@@manadegamer9315 Fair enough

[@Zeroga21]

For the last Card i think it would be better in it was a spell not a minion so you lose your 3/3 minion and the Effect ist only for the turn and with the spelldamage=0. but it would still be overpowerd.

[@mertertan5933]

charmin butterfly play in turn 3 and 5 in hunter deck easy win

[@khoanguyen2233]

I feel like the charming butterfly is referencing the butterfly effect . It makes sense that it destroys all minions because the theory is that if a butterfly flaps its wings in the right place it can cause a hurricane and that could be seen as a board clear.

[@Snoresville]

Yeah, he did say that.

[@azazelop5223]

I think the first card could be like pint sized summoner. Where it would show all of your minions with +2/+2 until you play a minion. I know that the counter to this is that it could confuse people, but I think it’s the best solution.

[@themrfj]

What if Magna was mage, cost 1 more mana, and instead said: " *Start of Game:* If your deck has no duplicates, give all spells in your opening hand (or deck) Twinspell."

[@theshinken]

That's quite the deck limitation for just a few extra spells, also a brutal diceroll. My idea: Mage, "Start of Game: If your deck has no spells, all your spells are Twinspells" - and print a few extra spell generator minions for good measure.

[@galatic-wyvern2993]

The issue with that is it makes you singleton deck basically not a singleton deck and that is problamatic

[@MDerezulko]

Since Ragnaros and Sylvanas are in hall of fame they would work for Rafaam's Adress Book - Hall of fame is wild only, and they can't be gotten through regular classic set packs - only be crafted afaik, so they're in past classic set.

[@themrfj]

How about changing Double Agent to a 3 mana 4/2 and "Whenever your opponent plays a card, deal 2 damage to each player."?

[@KiasGriffin]

Did you just call Illidan a villain He sacrificed everything what have you given

[@zachariz1490]

kias cole yeah, if i remember well, he's actually a nice dude who did all he could to save what he could

[@Willowisp927]

@@zachariz1490 Every hero is a villain in another story. Simplifying people as evil and good is just being naive.

[@maxdeth2333]

Magna definitely needs to be in a specific class because rogues can go infinite off of shadowstep with her

[@mortenamdisen306]

What happens if you play Fair Duel with Fandral Staghelm? Upgraded heropower for 1 mana for both players or?

[@Redzeths]

Morten Amdisen There is the bigger problem in that if someone plays fair duel and chooses upgrade your heropower and the opponent also has this card and plays it afterwards and also chooses upgrade your heropower, according to the mechanics, you will have a 1 cost upgraded hero power while your opponenet has a 2 cost one. Which doesn’t seem like a fair advantage for just playing the card first

[@likky1]

Redzeths if we follow the old razakus priest which made still make hero powers cost 0 after upgrades I think it would still work since the old starting hero power wording doesn’t exist like with genn

[@sparty23ful]

Transmuter in training: 4 cost 3-3 spell damage -3. Your spells that deal damage cost 3 less

[@superlucci]

9:18, how would Selfie be like a silence against Deathrattle? It would just transform itself into the same deathrattle minion. You didnt get rid of the Deathrattle

[@deathknelle3868]

And in this Corner would be better redone as a 1 mana 0/3 Arena Announcer with the effect "Whenever your opponent plays a minion, give it +2/2 and taunt and to a random minion in your hand." This way the Arena Announcer is still doing it's effect from And in this Corner.

[@alguien8665]

Changing last one to just affect damaging spells shouldn't be enough?

[@calixthenustv6739]

4:45 Witchwood isn't rotating this year, but I see the point

[@micah9247]

trump you say that there "isnt an obvious way to track *blank*" when there is the paladan dragon from blackrock mountain i believe that says "the next dragon that you play costs 2 less"

[@notrealatall337]

Yeah but thats only on you and it's an obvious mana save in hand not 8 turns in the future with a massive board effect

[@notrealatall337]

On a common no less

[@micah9247]

i was thinking of the first card "and in this corner" but yeah i guess your right

[@toddoverholt4556]

The way to make in this corner work is to have it be 'the next minion you play this turn' and have it apply an effect to the minion you play that applies the +2/+2 and taunt to the next minion your opponent plays

[@dakotakade3547]

Magna should just be a "start of game" effect. I know those are risky, but it'd force you to have one of each spell.

[@brandaccountname9833]

Magna could be a rouge it would be a way to push people to play miracle rouge

[@SDArthur0]

12:08 That card is a rare as well. -6 cost to spells doesn't look like a good idea.

[@maximedurante7574]

Please stop saying that adding something as simple as a glow effect on the cards in hand is impossible. It's completely feasible to just add a red glow to the minions in both players' hands to show the active effect of "IN THIS CORNER..." for instance. You'd never have greenlit C'Thun, dude!

[@redmage4457]

Maxime Duranté I agree with this, and it's not like this "persistent effect" thing hasn't been done before. Dragon consort was a 5 mana 5/5 that said "The next dragon you play cost 2 less" and that didn't have any indication at all.

[@Brian-dc7vg]

Funny how blizzard printed selfie but way better lol

[@honzaadje8849]

For the Mage card, maybe make it: Spells cost (3) less, but not less than (1). Just an idea

[@OnEiNsAnEmOtHeRfUcKa]

Still pretty goddamn broken.

[@DJROCKSTAZ]

My question is how the heck they managed to get that official looking Hearthstone art!

[@algotkristoffersson15]

One, people can remember stuff, you realy need to give people more credit, and two, just add a “Quest” indicator to the person who played it that counts up each turn.

[@xenopl111]

Selfie should just freeze your minion after the initial effect to mimic posing and balance it out.

[@4ndytrout46]

What if the first card was: summon a random minion from each player's hand. Give them both +2/+2 and taunt.

[@shaggyzoinks5436]

I think the flavor works better with the original design because like you are waiting for him to throw out his "champion"

[@Bee-zs1sb]

That would be 1 Mana combo disrupt

[@digiquo8143]

Magna is salvageable if she just reads "Battlecry: Give a random spell in your hand Twinspell"

[@HeldBack]

For 'In This Corner...' why not a highlight, like what happens with "If you're holding..." but only on hovering over the card in your hand?

[@erich1380]

what about for and in this corner you both get the buff to the next minion you draw?

[@Ferretlord87]

Kinda ruins the flavor, since It's introducing a fighter who then gets buffed, drawn cards would not be seen and wouldn't even need to be played for turns afterwards.

[@Sness1993]

6 Mana 4/5: Your spells cost 3 less, you can only cast 2 spells each turn. Maybe a bit overpowered but you can tweak it.

[@Karsh.]

So, in other words, it's basically a 0 mana Chillwind Yeti.

[@fosso8803]

@@Karsh. Ahahaha

[@omologo95]

@@Karsh. yeah. But a free chillwind yeti in the mid-lategame transition isn't all that busted

[@Sness1993]

@@Karsh. Or just a stronger Arcane Tyrant for a specific class

[@CL-jq1xs]

@@omologo95 say that to corridor creeper

[@Yaishto]

For Transmuter in Training, the only change I would make is to get rid of the word less. If all your spells costed 3 but had -3 spell damage, I think it could be workable. I imagine dropping her on turn 7 or 10 to combo with a big spell like pocket galaxy or 7 damage pyroblast.... Actually maybe still too good.

[@nskaligator]

Thanks! Gives me few ideas on design of my own.

[@jamesp877]

Your spells cost (3) less Battlecry - Spell damage -3, meaning, for the remainder of the game.

[@kuro13wolf]

Still pretty broken, you can win the game without casting a single damage dealing spell quite easily.

[@lhumanoideerrantdesinterne8598]

Also, the Antonidas infinte combo is still possible with this.

[@kuro13wolf]

​@@lhumanoideerrantdesinterne8598 True, this into one Apprentice will give you all the 0 mana deal 3 spells you can cast in one turn, which is a lot of damage.

[@CL-jq1xs]

Still too damn good

[@mngbb11]

Considering all the cards that are in the hall of fame now, I'm surprised Leroy is still around, seems like he limits quite a bit of design space

[@bakublader1999]

The design of and in this corner... is pretty easily fixed. Put a spotlight on your and your oppponent's hand. Kind of like a fighter introduction.

[@joshuawalters5173]

Charming Butterfly was supposed to reference the butterfly affect

[@Pythiuss]

and in this corner could be worded as "Each player puts an minion into play, it gets +2/+2 and taunt.

[@Miguel-dg7ql]

Deathbed Dweller has to be one of the best designs ever in custom hs

[@3xbucket]

this series needs to return

[@imjustmystik7894]

the butterfly reads 'in 8 turns' so shouldn't it tick on both players turn, like grul? so it would clear the board once 8 turns have gone by? Sounds awesome if can hold for 4 mana

[@KuroroSama42]

0:25 No easy way to track "the next minion"? Are you serious? The game already HAS that mechanic! It's just for mana (ex: Dragon Consort). It shows up in your hand for all minions and once one is played, the effect runs out and the rest go back to default. Same thing here, just give all minions in hand +2/+2 until one is played.

[@TheMigratedItalian]

the transmuter in training has an otk with leeroy and thats a problem

[@yellowistherainbow]

What about making transmuter in training spelldamage effect a battlecry? Battlecry: Spells do 0 damage Your spells cost (x) less

[@NadeVorazili]

What about getting rid of the spell damage and just making it "Your spells cost (3) less, you can only cast 1 spell this turn"?

[@KlintKaras]

Or "the first spell you cast each turn cost (3) less" or even "the first spell cast on each players turn cost (3) less"

[@ryuki2290]

What if there was a card that would let you choose target/s in your next "targets chosen randomly" card?