Topcon Triton- an old King. A review.

[@laurentNantel]

With newly purchased Topcon Triton, ImageNet6 is also used for creating reports and acquiring OCT, no more duality of software.

[@ocularimagingaficionado8649]

Thanks, for the update!

[@ocularimagingaficionado8649]

It really depends on your needs. Cirrus 6000 is newer, smaller, has better OCTA and it's slightly faster, higher resolution Oct that has some basic corneal analysis without the lens but the patient positioning is harder due to two chinrests and has no fundus camera. Also if you don't buy Zeiss Forum the progression analysis is limited. Triton is still nice OCT with ability to add Fluorescein Angiography, but is larger compared to cirrus. Honestly both are capable devices.

[@DRV13]

Which one u think is better.this or cirius 600?

[@marcoirvine5839]

Topcon. Forever. Swept source gives back amazing images

[@Arien17k]

Heavy and cumbersome, an overloaded of functions that take too much time to process for a busy practice (even with decently high spec PC), image quality drops dramatically even with modest lens opacity, never mind with pts with unstable fixation, scarcely customisable scan during acquisition. I can use whatever available that does the job but this machine is definitely not my preferred one.