One of the very few genuinely rugged and sexy British jets
@Jeff-uq7iu11 ай бұрын
It's a great looking aircraft 👍
@Barbadando11 ай бұрын
Its german
@AHSValor11 ай бұрын
@@karmakazi101 Indeed, very few. The British really do have a great deal of ugly contemporary jet designs
@sys920811 ай бұрын
@@karmakazi101it's design is very human.
@iLIKESNIPERS4711 ай бұрын
Its a multinational design
@deanhall536311 ай бұрын
Remember seeing these in the Iraq war they were awesome but have to say it took great skill and bravery from the British pilots, remember one of them doing a victory role down the Main Street in Baghdad that definitely had an effect on the minds of the Iraqis.
@patrickhuot00111 ай бұрын
The British Tornado will always be one of my favorite fighter jets.
@Barbadando11 ай бұрын
Its german
@DanielePaglia11 ай бұрын
It's anglo-german-italian airplane.
@Barbadando11 ай бұрын
@@DanielePaglia yeah right now those countries have their own version but the original design was made and created in germany
@DanielePaglia11 ай бұрын
@@Barbadando nope, on March 1968 Uk, West Germany and Italy founded "Panavia" and they developed the "Tornado", all these 3 countries received the first airplanes at the same time. I was in different factories in these 3 countries where they made the components.
@Barbadando11 ай бұрын
@@DanielePaglia but it was established in germany
@DaveyMulholland11 ай бұрын
Had the shi† scared out of me by these many times during my childhood on our farm. It's in a remote semi-mountainous region where they would practice. They'd suddenly be right on top of you at full throttle. Absolutely deafening and terrifying!
@michaelzona988011 ай бұрын
They should refit them for a close air support role similar to US A-10 warthogs. You never know what future conflicts will require. Treetop approach to support ground troops would be terrifying to the enemy.
@Zurvan10111 ай бұрын
Its not suitable for CAS. It doesn't have the maneuverability required to survive that type of role. Most of the airframes were also very close to their service life meaning that new airframes would have been needed. It's essentially a mach 2 flying brick. Very good a low level attacks, either nuclear or conventional against rear area targets. Or against slow moving bombers, as long as they're not escorted by fighters. The Harrier was a much better CAS aircraft, good payload and can turn on a sixpence.
@SituationNormalAint11 ай бұрын
one of the sexiest looking aircraft that ever flew, well done uk🇺🇲🇬🇧
@alebroker758711 ай бұрын
Wss not a Uk plane. It was a consortium, between UK, Germany and Italy.
@alebroker758711 ай бұрын
@@karmakazi101 part British
@iLIKESNIPERS4711 ай бұрын
It might have been something like 42.5% Germany 42.5% UK and 15% Italy
@billballbuster718611 ай бұрын
The Tornado F3 was a long range bomber interceptor, more agile than the Phantom but less than the Eagle.
@razorback13911 ай бұрын
The F3 is actually an interceptor and variant of the Tornado ADV series. I think you mean the ground attack variants of the 4th Gen fighter, the Tornado GR4 or GR1
@billballbuster718611 ай бұрын
@@razorback139 The Tornado F3 was a bomber interceptor. But rather than zoom clime to altitude as the original Interceptors like the Lightning and F-104. The Tornado F3 had greater range 1,853 kilometers (F-104 - 670 Km) and so could loiter for a much longer period usually at the Iceland-Norway gap. It was no slouch could hit Mach 2.3 at 30,000 ft.
@Millmiglia00111 ай бұрын
NOTE HE SAID 'RETIRED' NOT SCRAPPED - THAT'S MILITARY SPEAK FOR MOTHBALLED UNTIL NEEDED AGAIN.
@Orbital_Inclination8 ай бұрын
They're gone. Many are now in museums or used for technician training, but none are still airworthy
@Mr.Viridian11 ай бұрын
May the Tornado serve the Luftwaffe as long as possible
@staceymoss702911 ай бұрын
Now that's what a fighter should look like❤
@johngregory480111 ай бұрын
One helluva great plane!
@motorinternet653811 ай бұрын
You need a documentary because your editing and voice (idk if it's ai) are perfect for a documentary
@Garrus.Vakarian10 ай бұрын
"As of March 31st" R.A.F Tornadoes have been retired since 2019, I worked on the decommissioning of an older F.3 Tornado that was decommissioned in 2011. They've been retired for years now.
@redmondpeters622111 ай бұрын
I might be an Irishman but the Tornado is one of my favourite British aircraft.
@smokejaguar6711 ай бұрын
I had a good friend who was a Tornado GR4 pilot. An awesome chap
@davidkeat77Ай бұрын
Tornado is one Sick fighter jet 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧
@luichinplaystation61010 ай бұрын
That clip of accelerationtion is like a fine tea
@Maxley..11 ай бұрын
The mighty Tonka. Twin RB-199s and a moving map display. Literally. A map that moved, showing the continent you were probably on. But damn, it was a fine ship.
@mab218711 ай бұрын
This thing is a true Brick with wings and engines.
@paulaol24811 ай бұрын
The royal air force of great Britain 🇬🇧.. Flew the tornado fast and low and came out of knowhere and slapped the enemies of great Britain 💪
@Beeboyjack11 ай бұрын
I got to sit in one of these 2 days ago! So cool
@1chish11 ай бұрын
The RAF Tornados were trained to fly nuclear strikes at 150 feet. When they were deployed to Desert Storm they had to fly higher. At 250 feet to make safe delivery of the soon to be outlawed JP233 airfield bomblet system. To put that in context F-15s and other allied aircraft providing cover flew at 20,000 feet. When Saddam's air bases had been pretty much disabled in the first week the Tonkas switched to Laser guided munition directed by Buccaneers or with their own laser pods allowing the use of Paveway IV guided bombs. The 61 deployed RAF Tornado GR1s flew some 2,535 sorties employing 106 JP233s, and dropping 3,631 unguided 1,000-pound bombs, and 1,079 laser-guided bombs. They also flew 140 reconnaissance sorties and fired some 113 Air-Launched Anti-Radiation Missiles (ALARMs) on SEAD missions. RAF crews were suffering a loss every 80 sorties because of the nature of the low level flights compared to one every 750 for US sorties operating at higher levels.
@jamilhussain542111 ай бұрын
This is 1 badass fighter plane!!!!
@MarcG742411 ай бұрын
The UK Typhoon and the U.S Ardvark different countries same mission 💪🇬🇧🇺🇲
@georgepantazis14111 ай бұрын
F111c 🦘 Australia wish we still had them in the RAAF.
@Kontro_711 ай бұрын
My favourite millitary aircraft!
@kbtred5111 ай бұрын
Just disable these garbage cuts from your feed. In 1968, West Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, Italy and Canada formed a working group for the Multi Role Combat Aircraft (MRCA). As the partner nations' requirements were so diverse, it was decided to develop a single aircraft that could perform a variety of missions that were previously undertaken by a fleet of different aircraft. Britain later joined the MRCA group.
@herpderp490811 ай бұрын
"the u.k. plane"? what?!
@m4rkoza711 ай бұрын
UK's, Italy's and Germany's joint effort, so I guess it atleast partially counts
@chrisoberg688811 ай бұрын
Panavia
@davidd.c.934411 ай бұрын
Accuracy isn't a "thing" with some of the amateur youtubers.
@allgood676011 ай бұрын
Awesome 👍✈️
@bryfunkenstein11 ай бұрын
It's like a mini B1B...
@reynracoma983411 ай бұрын
What a F14 was originally going to somewhat look like.
@djtomoy11 ай бұрын
Well thank god the spectre of nuclear war no longer looms over Europe and we all get along smashingly 😊
@Legion-xq8eo11 ай бұрын
Other than Vlad threatening nuclear war every other week since his failed invasion of Ukraine!!
@nemo._.nobody11 ай бұрын
Smashingly being the key word i suppose
@abdulrahmanabdulhamid75511 ай бұрын
Jet yg paling menarik dan garang rekabentok nye dpd yg lain,2
@JamesW8111 ай бұрын
Would be a great addition to DCS.
@kkelwin196011 ай бұрын
No match for the Chariots. Psalms 91:7 [7]A thousand shall fall at thy side, and ten thousand at thy right hand; but it shall not come nigh thee.
@sidgar111 ай бұрын
The Tornado looks like a baby F-14
@khsh9911 ай бұрын
Many of those tornados were lost in peace time . 😅
@regesterw11 ай бұрын
It wanted to be an F-111 when it grew up !!!
@tusharchatterjee898611 ай бұрын
😂😂
@damedusa510711 ай бұрын
It was a far more capable aircraft, grew up much better.
@raviation711 ай бұрын
Gd job man
@rovercoupe710411 ай бұрын
It was a product of international co-operation between Italy, Germany and the UK. M.
@user-vd8xs6zd5w11 ай бұрын
더 높이 더 빨리 비행할수 있게 개선해야할 좋은 비행기
@diegopozze656711 ай бұрын
Ehilà guys also Italian air force......and we are still using.
@pulsar-helios-A11 ай бұрын
its german and british but mostly german and u call it a uk plane bruh
@thereisnofridge559311 ай бұрын
where did you get the idea that it was mostly german? also, italy was heavily involved
@iroezekiela729511 ай бұрын
The Baby Tomcat
@Orbital_Inclination8 ай бұрын
More like an F-111. This was never designed for naval use
@RustyOnGT10 ай бұрын
So it basically like the British version of the F-14?
@Orbital_Inclination8 ай бұрын
More like the F-111
@joserafaelgarciamorales872411 ай бұрын
cold ❄️war air craft.
@jarrydarrah306411 ай бұрын
The whats!!! Riggers??
@georgepantazis14111 ай бұрын
These would be a good fit for Ukraine 🇺🇦
@Arquon11 ай бұрын
Hier in Deutschland wird er auch jetzt ausgesondert.
@JazzJaRa11 ай бұрын
Erst wenn Ersatz dafür da ist und noch hat Deutschland die F-35 nicht.
@Arquon11 ай бұрын
Die sind aber wenigstens mitlerweile Bestellt, oder?
@JazzJaRa11 ай бұрын
@@Arquon Ab 2026 soll Deutschland die ersten F-35 erhalten.
@markjordan905911 ай бұрын
It wouldn’t have been a Cold War if they saw combat against Russia…
@AR1study11 ай бұрын
😮
@Geojr81511 ай бұрын
Should have took care of the Saddam regime then instead of waiting another ten years and made everyone cry about how “unjust” the Iraq war was
@SalimSalim-zz4kk11 ай бұрын
😂😂unjust 😂it was a lie because war is business for them they don't give a shit about people or dictatorship
@Geojr81511 ай бұрын
@@SalimSalim-zz4kk No it’s not so black and white. There are always many good and bad reasons to go to war. People love to hate on America and say those kinda things that you just said. But it was a very dangerous time for America and the West. There were terrorist cells all over the Middle East. INCLUDING IRAQ. Saddam had capabilities of obtaining WMDs and he was not being compliant with (I forget the organization’s name) but whoever was responsible for checking for nuclear facilities or manufacturing plants. He wasn’t letting them into Iraq. So what, do you think we should have just took Saddam at his word? America was not about to let another 9/11 happen. He was already an enemy and we should have finished the job in the Gulf War 10 years prior
@wpatrickw201211 ай бұрын
I wish the RAF would not have been so quick to scrap their Tornadoes, they would have been very useful in Ukraine. 😢
@brotherenoch683811 ай бұрын
The Tornado was/is a Beast! Often overlooked by those who are not in the know. Know this you would be hard pressed to find a more rugged and reliable airframe than the Tornado 🌪️ Hat’s off to 40 years of service 🫡
@burn-zv2um11 ай бұрын
Eight tornadoes lost in Gulf war. It's now been replaced with drones.
@Orbital_Inclination8 ай бұрын
It's not been replaced with drones. It's been replaced with Typhoon upgrades and the F-35B in RAF service.
@TheC-13011 ай бұрын
💪💪💪💪💪💪💪🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
@user-hg7hy8lv1m11 ай бұрын
🤦😳🇬🇧🤮🤮🤮
@TheC-13011 ай бұрын
@@user-hg7hy8lv1m 💀💀💀💀💀
@user-hg7hy8lv1m11 ай бұрын
@@TheC-130 🇬🇧🤮🤮🤮
@TheC-13011 ай бұрын
@@user-hg7hy8lv1m 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
@Number1sineaterfan11 ай бұрын
@@user-hg7hy8lv1m Skill issue
@kilovolt700811 ай бұрын
Why is there what looks like a tomcat
@marcgucciardo194211 ай бұрын
Shares Swing wing orsmness
@AR1study11 ай бұрын
Why you fears Russia ?
@thomaslake294611 ай бұрын
Better than the Eurofighter
@jamilhussain542111 ай бұрын
@@karmakazi101i aggree
@iLIKESNIPERS4711 ай бұрын
Not really but it looks way better than the Eurofighter
@damedusa510711 ай бұрын
@@jamilhussain5421then you would be stupid.
@robertbolding418211 ай бұрын
I think the English lost some to The Patriot missile.
@RazelDiel-vh9tp11 ай бұрын
Let's go ❤😅
@STASHYNSKYI11 ай бұрын
Tornado was shoot down by Serbian army in Bosnia 1994. Not army of Serbia but army of Republika Srpska.
@pjkdragoon11 ай бұрын
That's why it would be ideal for ukraine
@abhinandhanandh935911 ай бұрын
Jagur
@abolfazlmomeni846511 ай бұрын
🇩🇪💪💪💪💪💪
@RollingBowlingTrolling11 ай бұрын
Dear US, please stop naming stuff after our old kit. The LIGHTNING was a beautiful piece of bodge job. The f35 is just the f35. Av8 is name that should never have existed. Typically when gloating its the av8 but when talking about its faults you call it harrier... funny that isn't it!
@wanderschlosser185710 ай бұрын
There was a Lockheed P38 Lightning in WW2 and that was American. Long before the British English Electric Lightning.
@Bryan-cd9cl11 ай бұрын
I have no voice 😮
@kurtman75211 ай бұрын
They got fkd in irak
@chrishalsall18811 ай бұрын
The most beautiful jet ever built for my money.
@Ali_Hassani53711 ай бұрын
Combat 😂 iraq has no air fighters only 2 one of them mig 25 and shoot down F18 us pilot is Spyker
@piay964711 ай бұрын
panavia
@thaitraveller975611 ай бұрын
Another plane more reliable than the American aircraft that UK has got now
@milkybar0611 ай бұрын
Might need them in ukraine
@SasaImbroane-ss8nh11 ай бұрын
🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑
@r.guerreiro14011 ай бұрын
Why don't send them to Ukraine?
@misterbig902511 ай бұрын
Tornado didn't do well during the first gulf war.
@cosmos23711 ай бұрын
Tornado ran many of the most dangerous sorties.
@billcook748311 ай бұрын
Yes it did.
@philips170t11 ай бұрын
Terrain following strategy didn’t work well. It got shot down.
@billcook748311 ай бұрын
@@philips170t Did they achieve their missions ? Yes they did. Military aircraft have been getting shot down since they were first developed , that's the nature of warfare , it doesn't mean that aircraft are not effective , if that was the case no one would have any . Your comment is infantile , probably deliberately so, because you're a knob.
@damedusa510711 ай бұрын
That’s a silly take. It was given the riskiest missions and the hardest targets. Due to it ability’s, it went in low and attacked the most defended places like airfields. You are going to get losses attacking airfields with multiple air defence systems.
@paulclarke477611 ай бұрын
Give the Ukrainian Air Force these badboys..???
@ytsux925911 ай бұрын
These "bad" boys are just 3rd-gen fighters; nothing special.
@paulclarke477611 ай бұрын
@@ytsux9259 bro, its the Russians their fighting???? Fuckin paper aeroplanes would do those suckas damage!!!!
@keithprinn72011 ай бұрын
The Harrier, Vulcan, F4 Phantom and Tornado were massive value and effective for the RAF. against the soviet threats.Litghning is a disgrace and failure so many ways.
@Legion-xq8eo11 ай бұрын
Yeah that’s why it’s been over 1k sold!! Three different models and different mission capabilities built into each one, most widespread and mass produced 5th gen fighter, most widely adopted fifth gen fighter, first fighter fully capable of talking with and relaying assets to and from others so much so it’s like a flying database, god knows how many different contries came together to built parts for it so it has the widest distribution network of ANY fighter ever, any jet ever really but yeah sure it’s a failure!! I’m sure you know better than all the west’s engineers and greatest military minds put together!!
@ucihasenjusenju64111 ай бұрын
Give to Ukraina for fight rusian
@Firefighter253911 ай бұрын
Has it ever been considered to give them to Ukraine? 🤔 Germany will outphase theirs too and replace them with F35. They could be useful if they sped up the process.
@raghurajms11 ай бұрын
Why donating old planes for Ukrainian pilots, are they don't deserve new ones
@Firefighter253911 ай бұрын
@@raghurajms As they are available and expandable. Personally I would support ramping up military peosuction in order to give them better gear.
@raghurajms11 ай бұрын
@@Firefighter2539 a long lasting war is not good for anyone, but this war is not going to finish in near future
@ytsux925911 ай бұрын
It's just a 3rd-gen fighter; nothing special about it.
@davidd.c.934411 ай бұрын
When it came out in the 80's is was.
@Ade-mu4zn11 ай бұрын
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
@dopeterr878811 ай бұрын
The UK ain’t shit without the US and Nato
@Number1sineaterfan11 ай бұрын
There's like 2 countries in the world that could do anything without support what you just said means nothing
@msamadi733611 ай бұрын
Persian gulf learn it
@kenson933411 ай бұрын
Nato junk copy of mig 25
@iLIKESNIPERS4711 ай бұрын
MiG 25 is a High altitude fixed wing mach 3 interceptor, The Tornado is a Variable Wing Sweep strike aircraft, How is it a copy of the MiG 25?
@DEPjr011311 ай бұрын
Tornado is an awesome jet!
@kirkengnath550110 ай бұрын
lnteresting how one plane was retired and then replaced by two new aircraft's. Not really a money saving tactic. up dating the Tornado would have been less expensive than designing and building two new plane's.
@Orbital_Inclination8 ай бұрын
The F-35 and Typhoon are far more capable aircraft than Tornado. Upgrading the Tonka to compete with either would have been practically pointless.