TOTAL BREAKDOWN - SHIA & GEOPOLITICS! |

This video will breakdown the debate which took place discussing Shia & Geopolticis and breaking down the evidences presented by ‪@MuslimSkeptic‬
#brohajji
#islam
#shia

[@PiewPiew306]

I love brother Daniel, but you are right in this case. I hope he wil retrect his statements. But I feel the same as Daniel, I hope we can work together on some issues like defending al Aqsa and the muslim borders.

[@deadsheep404]

You want to work with Iran and Hezbollah on issues like defending the Muslim borders which they themselves are violating?! 🤦🏽‍♂️

[@timmccoin7818]

​@@deadsheep404Well if ur sunni countries aren't doing anything why not. The argument is really as simple as that

[@deadsheep404]

​@@timmccoin7818No, it is not "simple as that". Iran and its proxies are slaughtering Sunni Muslims in Syria as we speak, and have been doing it for over 2 decades in Iraq. On what basis do you ally with them? Are you saying Palestinian blood is worth more than Syrian and Iraqi and Yemeni blood? Fear Allah.

[@deadsheep404]

​@@timmccoin7818no it's not "simple as that". Iran and its proxies are currently killing Sunnis in Syria and Iraq for the past 2+ decades. Are you saying Palestinian blood is worth more than Syrian, Iraqi, and Yemeni blood? Fear Allah

[@AbuYusuf-fz5bt]

So you want to collaborate and work with the same Iran that kills Sunnis all the time across the Middle East in Yemen, Lebanon, Syria and Iraq? Shame on you

[@son_of_alandalus]

One big issue is this debate being hosted by a non-muslim moderator/channel. showing muslims fighting eachother to the kuffar is not good

[@MilahanPhilosophersCorner]

Moderm Day Debate is anti Muslim. I use to be a member of the channel. And they allow lots of insults towards Muslims.

[@MilahanPhilosophersCorner]

James of the modern day debate channel is anti Muslim.

[@usmanzeb1611]

​@MilahanPhilosophersCorner how is he anti-muslim. he host lots of debates with different topics

[@EazyAzCanBe]

If brother Daniel had just said he believes in a political alliance for a common objective it would have been enough, i don't know why he was trying to defend some aspects of the shia ideology.

[@anismebtouche7108]

You're right he sees aqidah as a valid ikhtilaf as if it is fiqh

[@AliHusayn00]

As an Ex Shia, he still has little knowledge of what their scholars believe. Sistani, Khomeini, Khoei and their likes, even classical ones like Majlisi II, were clear cut kuffar. To defend Sistani is crazy. I’d expect him to know more.

[@HanaHana-ft9li]

Exactly esp when he is so obviously so ignorant about Shia religion lol. A lot of ppl even Shia speak from their **** while they never touch Shia books. Any sane person wouldn’t defend Shia after going through their books and Hadith collections.

[@HanaHana-ft9li]

@@AliHusayn00exactly I have a lot of majlisi books like Bihar I’m always laughing when I read them. I can’t believe Shia scholars call him the sheikh of “Islam” and try to compare him to ibn taymiya. Majlisi says ahlulbayt aren’t even humans lol

[@AliHusayn00]

@@HanaHana-ft9li Akhi Al Kareem that complete Kafir believed in CLEAR cut Tahreef, and this dajjal Qab7allah wajhu said it’s WAJIB to believe in Tahreef. The likes of Khomeini stood in Najaf on the mimbar and recited Ziyarat E Rajabiya. Shirk on freaking steroids. I feel bad for the general Shia who are deceived by them, and especially the completely ignorant Sunnis who say “Imam” for Khomeini and Sistani. May Allah guide all.

[@studentofsacredknowledge.9359]

Barakallah feek Sheikh...you have just done the Ummah a huge honour. Highly appreciate it. Hope and pray it gets to Bro Daniel and he immediately retracts from his mistakes. Rather than defending the Shia his argument should have more in line with what the Sunni Leadership is doing or has done in this horrendous situation to help the oppressed...

[@Alexstewart-x7h]

Thanks, bro Hajji! May Allah reward you and increase you in all that is good. I was surprised why no one was responding to the debate video. waiting and waiting. love all the Ambiya and Sahaba, and I cannot bear to hear anyone cursing the Sahaba. Daniel has gone too far. I admired him for his work, but now, man no more can’t even stand seeing his face anymore-not because of allying with Shia or praising them. I did admire his efforts against Madkhalism and other issues. I agree that Sunni leaders are doing nothing, and both Arabs and non-Arabs are in a bad position regarding Palestinians. But, man, that doesn’t mean you can legitimize Shi’ism or degrade Sunni Islam. The way he represents Sunnis is unacceptable. As for the other two debaters, they didn’t represent Muslims or Sunnis well either. Attacking Daniel’s sister and family was disgusting. waiting to hear more from you regarding this debate please keep posting, and others like you should also come forward and to address & guide other towards the right path.

[@zayn6725]

Daniel making it seem as if the Shia have no problematic beliefs is a calamity for the Muslims.

[@Admin.-tt2li]

Our beliefs don't take us out of islam, that's the debate

[@Alexstewart-x7h]

​@@Admin.-tt2li Yes, invincibility even if one farted, don't take him out of wudu.

[@HanaHana-ft9li]

@@Admin.-tt2lilol your beliefs will definetly take you out of Islam. First you believe there are 12 individuals chosen/appointed by Allah directly just like how he chose prophets who are greater in position than all prophets to the point some shias say even greater than Muhammad himself lol. That’s first second you believe the imams are infallible which there is no proof for it just speculation yet you firmly believe them to be sinless who even make no mistakes and know the total knowledge of the past and the present and the future lol who know what’s in the heart of every living thing and that nothing is hidden form their sight/knowledge lol. What’s the different between them and Allah? Zero.

[@HanaHana-ft9li]

@@Admin.-tt2liother beliefs like raj3a that ppl who died will come back to life and fight the sahaba and kill then again lol lots of hilarious beliefs no sane Muslim can accept them.

[@HanaHana-ft9li]

@@Admin.-tt2libeliefs like the names and attributes are ahlulbayt so Allah is ahlulbayt lol. Shia believe Allah is a name created refers to the imam. This belief is unanimous among Shia scholars which the layman Shia have zero knowledge about

[@YahyeSaid-f7m]

Bro Hajji may Allah reward you and increase you in everything good.

[@bashar4550]

DH is wrong here. And it's obvious doesn't mean he is wrong in other issues but yes he needs to look and make it clear

[@HanaHana-ft9li]

Exactly he needs to read Shia books not just Shia online forums lol

[@someone-kc6bb]

bro hajji love ur work refuting shias n madhalis

[@momonasri8611]

I really admire brother Daniel for his skills in debating and taking down the enemy of Islam, like strange ideas such as liberalism, secularism, modernity, feminism, and what he refers to as "simp imams." It's truly impressive how he has completely retired and defeated some of proponents of these ideologies. His debating skills against these enemies are amazing. However, I find it confusing when it comes to his views on Shia, he can suggest some sorts of collaboration in defense of Muslim people and their lands against crusaders and other enemies but to go to this extreme, nah also he suggests collaborating with far-right Christians. I guess he’s only human, and I pray that Allah keeps him and all of us on the right path. Ameen.

[@briancordero7674]

Daniel haqiqatjou came a Shia background and still has some residuals that need clarification. Also he is anti Imperialist which is consistent with Islam when connected to disbelief in Taghut and Walaa and Baraa, and not being conflated with Marxist or Revolutionary ideologies.

[@scorpyful]

Im shocked on Bro Hajjis calm and relaxed approach in giving Naseeha to Daniel despite some of the clear mistakes and ignorance he has exposed in trying so hard to defend the Shia A'qeedah Authubillah but there is no same level of calmness and fairness when advising and correcting the so called Salafi Dua'aat (e.g. Dawahman etc) I ask Allah to accept the haq which Bro Hajji has clearly presented in this video and ask Allah to guide us all to the Haq and from speaking about the deen without knowledge Ameen

[@QananiisaaIdris]

I don’t know why you would be close to Abu Layth after how he puts doubts into Sahih Al Bukhari and Sahih Muslim.

[@homtanks7259]

JazakAllah'u khairan brother

[@lolo-eq1zq]

The problem with preachers like daniel is that they present themselves as muftis and openly pass verdicts while they are just preachers of islam to the disbelievers and not legal experts😂

[@SaidMetiche-qy9hb]

Daniel is going off the rails

[@HanaHana-ft9li]

It’s bcos of his hatred of Sunni rulers he’s compromising with the evil Shias.

[@HanaHana-ft9li]

He is entertaining shias bcos of his hatred of Sunnis lol

[@Path2paradise123]

What’s the intro nasheed called ?

[@HanaHana-ft9li]

Let me know please

[@stuffsummedup22]

متاهات الحياة

[@Path2paradise123]

Found it ‎جزاك الله خيرا

[@anismebtouche7108]

Good analysis brother Hajji

[@Abuibraheem-k6c]

Our mother Aisha and talha and alzubair were not transgressors the transgressors were the killers of uthman and who were in Ali’s Army may. The original Bukhari does not label them as Bukhaut of Hadith aamar bin Yasir and it’s fabricated may allah have mercy on all the sahaba.

[@Admin.-tt2li]

Talha and zubayr fought against the 4th rightfully guided kalifa. During the battle they understood they were wrong and tried to flee

[@Abuibraheem-k6c]

@ Ali ra was not given bayah by most sahaba it was a time of fitnah. And the killers of uthman ra were the ones who gave him bayaah and some sahaba. Abu musa ashari stripped him of the rule at the judgment between muawiaah and Ali. Abu hanifa nor alshafii nor almaliki regarded Ali as a fourth khalifa even aisha ra our mother did not regard him as a fourth khalifa. The fourth khalifa was muawiaah Allah knows best

[@m-aiz7353]

Ohh jahil Bukhari 2812 is authentic ok, u have very fabricated mentality ok, everyone give to Ali(A.S) except people of sham(LA)

[@m-aiz7353]

​@@Abuibraheem-k6cu jahil maloon nasabi lier, All the Fours imams considered ali as four caliph, imam Ahmed hanbal said "whoever doesn't consider Ali to the Khalifa, he is more misguided than his donkey".... Lanat on your zindiq maloon muawiya(LA) and his dogs(jamah) and those who do not consider Ali to be the Khalifa

[@m-aiz7353]

Why are you lying🤥 u jahil maloon nasabi, all four imams consider Ali(A.S) to be the fourth caliph, imam Ahmed hanbal said "whoever doesn't consider Ali to be Khalifa, he is more misguided than his donkey"........ Lanat on those who don't consider Ali(A.S) to the Khalifa and lanat on muawiya(LA) and his dogs(jamah)

[@shafaqshah3622]

Imaam ali called him a lier and hatred towards ahlul bait as ibn tameyah look what he says about yazid when are these toxic so called hatred leave these scholars

[@SalafiOnyx]

Not a follower at all (quite the opposite) but May Allah guide you Hajji. Seems you're slowly opening your eyes to many things, may Allah keep opening your eyes because you are being very very mislead. Been there. Please check the series "replying crystal clear to the people of takfeer" of AbdulAziz Al Haqqan (Student of the Mufti of Madinah, Shaykh AbderRazzaq Al Badr etc), quite literally changed my life Alhamdulillah. I'll still make videos about your mistakes, academically & respectfully, when I have time in shaa Allah

[@PiewPiew306]

Going against idjmaa is not kuffar but haram.

[@hamadali1169]

It is kufr Learn your deen properly before speaking

[@PiewPiew306]

Can you tell us what your conclusion is? Are shia (the awam) kuffar?

[@Baboojohn]

Not really. Before I used to think so. But if you go to thier forums you'll see that they are different. A lot of shias negate these kufri stuff about all-knowing imams, distortion of the Quran and even cursing Sahabah. So we shouldn't be so confident about takfeer of awwam

[@agp4580]

I have talked to Shias who only call themselves Shia by name, not by belief.

[@HMG2119]

Shias are not one body of beliefs, just like you can’t generalise the masses you can’t generalise the shias. Majority of them are Muslims, if someone was to explain the issues to them, they would most likely deny any knowledge of the nonsense people think they believe.

[@hamadali1169]

Yes

[@hamadali1169]

​@@agp4580 it seems you haven't even heard of Taqiyah being 9/10 part of Shia belief

[@abuAbdul-Mumeet]

44:00 "This ummah will never unite upon misguidance" (and various wordings meaning the same thing with other chains) - FABRICATED HADEETH, A LIE UPON THE PROPHET (sollaa Allahu `alayhi wa-sallam) BY DANIEL AND WHOEVER RELAYED IT BEFORE HIM AND WHOEVER RELAYS IT AFTER HIM!

[@abuAbdul-Mumeet]

He said "This is a type of INFALLIBILITY" meaning he is claiming the scholars do not make mistakes or errors in the deen whatsoever! Now I am beginning to see where my ex wife got these EVIL beliefs... I bet he got that from "The Bayan Islamic Graduate School" where he "qualified" just like Omar Suleiman and Nouman Ali Khan and other heretics. Interestingly, he calls it "the heretic factory"; it is all starting to make more sense now.. my ex wife claims "The scholars are DIVINELY APPOINTED by Allah" and she also says "The scholars are INFALLIBLE and GUARANTEED JANNAH" and I used to try to get her away from such wild beliefs but all she did was argue and accuse ME of kufr and then call ME "takfeeri" for saying such beliefs remove people from islaam as they are contrary to the qur'aan and the sunnah and the beliefs established from the qur'aan and the sunnah! Now I can see the link, as she is OBSESSED with all those EVIL scholars from that place of huge fitnah!!!

[@abuAbdul-Mumeet]

I am sorry to say this brother, but it is beginning to look more and more like Daniel is "controlled opposition" from "The Bayan Islamic Graduate School".... do not forget and overlook the fact the enemies of Allah do use controlled opposition and spying!

[@briancordero7674]

Ijma3 of the Salaf Salih is bonding on the Umma specifically based on Surah Nisa :115 and the Ulema of Ahl Sunna generally, lest the Din itself be marked by ambiguities, contradictions and confusion with absolutely no way out.

[@abuAbdul-Mumeet]

@@briancordero7674 I know this, but the problem begins when people lie about what the ijmaa` is indeed!

[@abuAbdul-Mumeet]

​@@briancordero7674 Daniel is lying about the ijmaa` actually... I can only speak the truth! Regarding his false claim about it not removing one from islaam if one slanders only one of the senior companions or a few of them then read what Allah says in the qur'aan about those who become angry when they hear mention of the companions, they are indeed hypocrites and hypocrites are unbelievers. There is no mention in the qur'aan that one is excused for slandering only one or two or three companions or any number and so we will understand it to mean ANY number from 1 to however many are being slandered as it is a generalized statement and this precludes by the language that it means any number regardless of how few or how many. How about if it was ONLY abu Bakr and `Umar, or even just one of the two? And we can presume those two would be the most likely the shi`ah will slander of all the companions, and Daniel specified them anyway... since the messenger of Allah (peace and blessing of Allah upon him) said abu Bakr is the highest in faith after him and `Umar is the second highest in faith after him and there are many narrations praising these two in so many ways, then by default of logic to curse any one of those two is to claim the prophet was a liar and this is to claim Allah made a bad decision to make him the seal of the prophets or a prophet at all if that were to have been the truth - and Allah and His messenger are far removed from such evil and free from it! Such a person who curses even one of the two or even any one of the righteous companions is a kaafir, full stop! Whoever denies this is himself a kaafir and we do not change these principles of islaam!

[@absarh2036]

Thank you for boycotting efforts everyone

[@yb3547]

So why not speak to him off camera

[@sagek114]

learn to agree to disagree with love muslims....check your egos and unify...unity is not uniformity.....we are being slaughtered

[@imsoniceee]

If you're so tuff why don't you debate Daniel like a man ??? U debate shamsi and others at speakers corner

[@scientiest12]

I watch Daniel but come on. It's unfair to label hajji as trying to be 'tuff'. He was respectful and to the point in his critique.

[@irfanmohd091]

I watch both. Respect of them. How is tuff when he spits facts

[@imsoniceee]

@@scientiest12 he can still be respectful in the debate. Why talk to the camera by yourself about Daniel instead of debating Daniel like a man ♂️

[@Ebn_hawwa]

جَزَاكُمُ اللهُ خَيْرًا كَثِيْرًا وَجَزَاكُمُ اللهُ اَحْسَنَ الْجَزَاء

[@shafaqshah3622]

Its just battering shia he does not even know the quran

[@shafaqshah3622]

He has read and interpreted it wrong it does not even mean that what a lier

[@MrTruthAndFacts]

Brother Daniel is 100% right. He's logical, his arguments are based on Sharia, and he's simply right. I'm done with those who portray the Syrian struggle as the only and worst struggles of Muslims. This is simply untrue! What about the hundreds of thousands of victims of the UAE in Yemen, Libya, and Sudan? Are we to say we shouldn't ally with the UAE if they decide to support Gaza because of what they did or even because of their Aqueeda?

[@shafaqshah3622]

Look at the sunni books what kufr or says in bukhari muslim about disrespectful about the prophet saw split into four sets can't decide where to put they hands in prayer