Toyota Tundra gets a Supercharger with Before/After Dyno Pulls || Magnuson Superchargers

[@leedye6687]

Wow, that is a low reading dyno.

[@jesusisking6957]

Can you do me , us the hugest favor and ask the owner of the Tundra what precise grille is that or provide a part number . Thank you

[@bdawg2513]

I fail to see how 150 horses is worth $7600 just for the part. So not worth it to me

[@Chad03Cobra]

Dang I wish they had this for the Gen 1

[@mr.pinecone2006]

Same can’t even change the cam’s

[@zakaroonetwork777]

Do you have to do a ECM tune? I heard you have to do a Tune even if you just do an H-Pipe and High Flow Exhaust. Also Why can you Not have High Flow headers with a Supercharger?

[@VMPPerformanceTV]

It depends on the vehicle itself. You'll find that most modern vehicles will require tuning if anything effects what the sensors are measuring. With a supercharger, you'll definitely need a calibration because of the increased airflow and fuel demand from adding forced induction.

[@rideyamaha4lifeyz133]

How much was labor cost of Install

[@Highlander1432]

Lol They'll charge almost as much as the kit costs

[@westernsharpie]

Very nice!

[@linksofcanmore]

What grille is that???

[@raymondgoad9356]

Trd Sport grill

[@jesusisking6957]

@@raymondgoad9356No it isnt , do you see an emblem in the center ?

[@jasonbyassee7541]

Dyno numbers on the stock engine are way low. I’ve got a 2007 Tundra with 5.7 and it is hands down the quickest truck I’ve ever had. Aren’t the power #’s really close to 400 hp and torque

[@gregoryshelton1358]

Big tires and 430 gears hurt numbers.

[@bradmo9281]

2007-2021 Stock tundra makes 300-310 rwhp. They’re one of the slowest trucks in today’s standards. A 5.0 with e85 tune would outrun a supercharged tundra.

[@esteemedenergy]

@@bradmo9281 You’r not very bright, are you? A whipple 2.9 Tundra is 490rwhp. A much newer F150 with the 5.0 even with a E85 tune is 400rwhp, and that is if you get the blend correct. E85 just sucks and more of a hassle as each station has varying amounts. So, a supercharged Tundra will destroy a 5.0. Also, the F150 is still just a Ford, which is to say - falls apart.

[@bradmo9281]

@@esteemedenergy I’m plenty bright I’ve owned both of the trucks. Have you ever heard of a thing called power to weight ratio. Plus the 10 speed in the f150. My truck makes 458 rwhp with just a simple bolt mustang manifold e85 and off road y-pipe. The tundras are great dependable trucks but are heavy and slow compared to the newer ones.

[@AB-coyote]

@@esteemedenergy the tundra is a good truck but it seems cars aren’t your thing. The coyote has proven to be beyond durable.

[@joshuablair4645]

That's crazy, just a good exhaust and cold air will produce that on a stock engine, the math ain't mathin.

[@eriknash8783]

Wheel HP is a lot different than the 381 crank hp. Wheel HP is also dependent on tire size. The number to focus on is the delta between before and after.

[@RedondoBeach2]

Will this pass emissions tests in California? Also, what MPG does this give the truck? If this was answered in the video, I apologize for asking, but the video will not play. Most likely an issue with my computer, not the video.

[@VMPPerformanceTV]

Yes we have a carb legal kit option for you, we have one in stock and would like to make you a great deal on it. [e-mail]

[@jerryvaldez3647]

TVS2650 BETTER MAGNUSON SC FOR ME

[@DatdudeTi]

The Power to Dollar ratio makes zero sense lmfao 🤣.

[@cesarsaavedra3095]

8k to supercharge is just too much.

[@Highlander1432]

This is the price of admission now unfortunately. See if you can get a set of headers and E85 tune. $2k and probably 50-60 whp

[@cesarsaavedra3095]

@@Highlander1432 I given up on the tundra performance route . The truck is perfect as is. Might go old school 81 z28 . With a built 427 and 4 speed.

[@Highlander1432]

@cesarsaavedra3095 Good choice Much more satisfying in a real muscle car! I have 2 Camaros and they're a blast

[@Andreallen4]

The numbers were embarrassing, I’m sorry.

[@VMPPerformanceTV]

It's important to keep in mind the goals and usage of the vehicle. This kit is just a 7 psi kit meant for a moderate upgrade/increase in performance.

[@Captndarty]

Rear wheel horsepower not at the crank. Probably 550 squared at the crank.

[@Andreallen4]

@@Captndarty personally, it still doesn’t justify the cost to power ratio for that little gained for a $7800 kit + labor. I would of just enjoyed the vehicle as is.

[@Captndarty]

@@Andreallen4 Well that’s your economics. 44% increase in power is pretty damn good and cheaper than getting into a brand new boosted vehicle

[@Andreallen4]

@@Captndarty that’s funny. I have 2 project cars, one over 700whp and a FBO Coyote, a house an a truck. Economics isn’t my issue. It’s that a kit that barely makes 400whp is a waste of money, or the platform you are modding is a weak platform for power. Either way money don’t make you smart, especially when little is gained from spending it.

[@freedom6919741]

The Coyote is just superior to all engines these days !

[@VMPPerformanceTV]

We are particularly fond of Coyote engines as well. But for as mild and reliable as this set up is, it's a very healthy upgrade in performance for a daily driver!

[@freedom6919741]

@@VMPPerformanceTV 👍

[@esteemedenergy]

Except the rest of the Ford just falls part - all the time. This is why the F150 is ranked so poorly in every reliability study.

[@02autogt]

@@esteemedenergy You've had your doody pushed in by a Ford haven't you... 😂😂😂😂😂

[@ptownrat3811]

And in the rest of the world where it really matters the LS dominates.