Travel faster than speed of light by hacking the machine code of the universe | Stephen Wolfram

See full episode (Lex Fridman Podcast): • Stephen Wolfram: Funda...
PODCAST INFO:
Podcast website: lexfridman.com/podcast
Apple Podcasts: apple.co/2lwqZIr
Spotify: spoti.fi/2nEwCF8
RSS: lexfridman.com/feed/podcast/
Full episodes playlist: • Lex Fridman Podcast
Clips playlist: • Lex Fridman Podcast Clips
CONNECT:
- Subscribe to this KZbin channel
- Twitter: / lexfridman
- LinkedIn: / lexfridman
- Facebook: / lexfridmanpage
- Instagram: / lexfridman
- Medium: / lexfridman
- Support on Patreon: / lexfridman

[@SkyCoreLLC]

This seems like a interview from the future when all intellectuals are in prison.

[@MuddahFukkah]

ROFLMAO!! xDD

[@_John_P]

Religion took over the government and all scientists are in jail waiting for their sentences. Lex was sent to collect evidence of how subversive they still are but got involved instead.

[@tommygunhunter]

Not a prison, more like a secure psychiatric hospital!

[@tomecalm7]

@@livefree1030 For what??? Living Free??? LOL! Regurgitate much? I wonder if you're even smart enough to realize that you just implied that Trump supporters are the intellectuals. What does that make you? People like you are always trying so hard to get a poke at the President that you only end up shitting on yourselves. Well, that makes sense! Babies do tend to shit their pants from time to time. LMAO!!!

[@theotormon]

@@livefree1030 Trolling is a waste of your life.

[@alanammann5380]

The idea of an “alien physics” reminds me of a cat looking out the window as a jetliner passes by - we can roughly communicate to a cat that, say, “this is your food”, but we can’t, no matter how patiently, communicate the idea of a jetliner. And yet the jetliner is right there - the cat can see it. The cat can roughly understand what a bird or a rival cat is, but never a jetliner. It makes me wonder if there is anything we can’t, even in principle, understand despite it being right in front of us. What would our jetliner look like? And if there is no such thing, wouldn’t it be strange that our brains, having evolved at the banana scale, would have the potential for universal comprehension?

[@Sonofsol]

Interesting thought

[@3rdrock]

Are you sure it's not just a communication problem?

[@ivarsvilums]

There are more stars in just our milky way galaxy than there are grains of sand on Earth and there are more galaxies in the universe than there are stars in our milky way and who can even guess how many universes there are. The energies and resources available boggle the mind. Our brains cannot comprehend the vastness and richness surrounding and available to every one of us if only we were willing to see, understand, and use it. Anyone that has mastered routine travel throughout the universe isn't going to be interested in the feeble resources we spend so much of our limited lives and consciousness fighting over. It's just too insignificant and irrelevant. Most likely any such visitors coming here would be post-biological with thoughts and interests that we would understand about as well as my cat understands when he watches me write computer code. I may be algorithmically implementing a virtual model of a dynamic evolutionary network to test the ramifications of a hand-shaking hypothesis but he understands my moving fingers to be just an invitation to scratch him behind his ears and acts accordingly. Sadly, we would have to transcend what we are and then we would no longer be human. Fortunately, we still have much room to grow with what we are and what we can be. The question is if we will want to.

[@cycling9945]

Alan Ammann nice analogy my friend

[@andrewmurphy8154]

​@@ivarsvilums​The word universe means "all that exists" or "all that exists as a single whole". Therefore, the idea of a multi-verse or multiple universes is non-sensical. This misuse is a pet peeve of mine. Perhaps another word like 'cosmos' could be employed to express the idea of co-existent yet for all practical purposes independent regions of space-time.

[@boyerindustries]

It’s entirely possible that this is the most interesting video title on KZbin

[@ivarsvilums]

"Boy, that seems really hard!" It might not be. It was well within the crafting ability of people in ancient Greece and even much earlier to build a phonograph, glider, or even a pinhole camera and photographic film as well as many other modern miracles. It wasn't that it was hard to do, it was that they couldn't think of putting the simple things at hand together that particular way because their conscious sense of reality and language did not have an effective pathway to think of a practical possibility of those things. They did not have the words or thoughts and thus could not conceive of those possibilities even though technically it was well within their abilities. I wonder what simple miracles we miss every day because our language and beliefs just don't allow us to go there.

[@SongWhisperer]

Someday, some brilliant mind will come along and show us what we are missing.

[@egor.okhterov]

Joel Krysiak no, you compressed it in a wrong way

[@egor.okhterov]

@Joel Krysiak your statement is false

[@egor.okhterov]

@Joel Krysiak "it's obvious use that nobody else can see" - so, that was wrong

[@Atenejin]

I disagree. Ancient Greeks were very creative and they did build a number of incredible devices such as the Mechanism of Antikythera, the steam powered pigeon of Archytas etc. What they did lack however was advanced chemistry and industrialization. Those two were both very critical at the end of 18th century in order to create the foundation that later produced the modern material (plastic, practical inventions, etc).

[@garrettlancy1606]

To speak on Dr. Wolfmans comment about the current crude use of heat, there was a guest on Joe Rogan’s podcast(can’t recall his name) but he talked about “professional breathers” being able to control the temperature of different quadrants of their limbs. (Ie: controlling the oxygen flow from the left side of their right hand from the left side of their right hand.)

[@richard_d_bird]

i know at one point in this talk, wolfram said something like "it sounds like i'm not really saying anything." which, i'm sure what he's saying isn't *nothing,* but i doubt it's anything near as much as he wants us to think it is

[@animalntelligence3170]

what do you base this on? your own background in physics and math? wolfram is an extremely talented and imaginative scientist and was a genuine child prodigy.

[@MrLimpingTwerp]

@@animalntelligence3170 So was Mill. He still didn't make a lot of sense. History will decide if he's right or not, not fanboyism.

[@animalntelligence3170]

@@MrLimpingTwerp i will go with a successful businessman whose biz is in fact math and physics over a random youtube post by a guy named dick bird -- he makes sense to me, you can make your own choice.

[@richard_d_bird]

@@animalntelligence3170 oh, i base that on this habit i have, of looking things up and finding out what other, better informed people, have had to say about them. i have this idea that my own poor ignorance, which you rightly point out, is no basis for disproving this guy... is also not a real good platform for blindly worshiping at the altar of his impressive credentials, and swallowing absolutely everything he says whole, regardless of how sensationalist his claims might sound. i'm funny that way. i am willing, like i said, to say i don't think what he's saying is *nothing,* just based on what little i managed to absorb in few computational theory courses and whatever, quite a while back now. but even if i didn't have that minimal experience, it would be surprising if he couldn't spew a lot of great sounding stuff, given his background, wouldn't it. so yeah, sorry if i shit on your idol or anything, but hey, feel free to bite my ass. have a nice day.

[@richard_d_bird]

@Christian William you are correct sir

[@Dante3085]

In some sense, it is really crazy that we, humans and our future ai children, are able to imagine things that are not possible within the universe. That is really weird.

[@brianramirez8255]

Powerful Lex Fridman

[@sasatodorovic3210]

Hey just wanna thank you for this awesome podcast. You are doing a great job.

[@caseychesh]

Agree

[@xmchughs]

Second that

[@fredoman2683]

3rd that 😎

[@F19991]

Thanks!

[@iakobkv271]

as if you understood anything he says :D

[@natedavis4588]

Lex and/or Stephen should talk to Isaac Arthur about sci-fi stuff, this clip made me think back to some of his FTL videos. I'm sure he could brush Stephen up pretty quick.

[@aaronlewis4475]

The fact that planck length/ planck time exist implies that the universe is pixelated and has a framerate, which implies a code-like framework of physics. This implies that there could be universe "hackers" just like we have computer hackers. Although the analogy wouldnt quite be accurate. Basically what Im saying is Neo is about to fight agent Smith.

[@A.T.-89]

It does not and it actually follows from Heisenberg's principle that space and time cannot be discrete. People who say otherwise are complete laymen.

[@LionKimbro]

It's a common misconception that Planck length mean that the universe is on a grid, but it's really not the case.

[@jd35711]

i once thought the same but my current understanding is that they do not imply that the universe is discreet and granular, which is not to say that reality is necessarily smooth and continuous.

[@mydogbrian4814]

- It has been proven that spacetime is not quantasized (or piccelated) down to Plank Length by observing light from distant quasars split by gravitational lensing & combined in earth detectors. - There for your assumption of "quanta" on a fundamental level is invalid.

[@RWin-fp5jn]

Stephen, hats off to you Sir !!! it seems through the path of math you are close to the final breakthrough here! What is happening is that our continuum is not a mono-continuum but a dual continuum setting of the same functions (grid, clock, potential , inertia) and measures on the other hand (space, time, energy, mass). In the planck scale world energy and space pivot in their functions as do time and mass. Both setups hover always apply to all objects, yet they are orthogonally aligned and have a minus sign. This means; every change of 'energy as a particle' function (potential) must be accompanied by a negative shrinkage of 'energy as a grid' around it to maintain the zero balanced equilibrium of our original universe. In measures: [m/s] must be accompanied by [-J/kg] grid shrinkage in front of it. [-J/kg] of course in spacetime terms leads to [-J/kg=-Nm/kg =-m2/s2] so a virtual accelerated shrinkage of spacetime surface. This is what Einstein used for his description of GR of restmass (with it is many tiny unaligned shrinkage effects of all subatomic constituents combined)... As for breaking C speed; you will effectively 'puncture' the torus of spacetime around you, inverting from ST to the orthogonal setting of the EM continuum , in other words you become a spatial singularity (think of atoms as micro-singularities spinors wrapping straight continuous ST fieldlines into orthogonal wrapped windings we perceive as integers (quanta) of energy distances). You should look at the math of an inverting punctured torus (e.g. as displayed at the wikipedia torus page). This will give you the matching math. So combining all; our galaxy would be a spatial singularity governed by the EM continuum, our solar system should be a energy singularity governed by the ST continuum, atoms would again be micro spatial singularities (or micro 'Spinors' if you like in terms of Eric Weinstein / Penrose) , governed by the ME setup,; The atom nucleus again a ME singularity governed by the ST continuum etc etc...I send you the wider theoretic context earlier.. It seems you have solved it from the math perspective as well....again hats off to you! You should get a Nobel prize or two for this...Physics is finally complete after a 100 year dark age....

[@quosswimblik4489]

I think entropy and light speed relate so to go faster than light we would need simply to effect the small and high detail of the craft across with an ability of more efficiency in form than light at getting faster without breakdown.

[@TerryNails]

Is the universe computational or is the view of the universe as being computational just a filter that those who are mathematically obsessed view reality through? The reason that we have meridians in acupuncture is because the first translator of the Chinese text into English was a cartographer.

[@2Worlds_and_InBetween]

I have a feeling that when you grasp some shard... glint of understanding of the fundamental substrate. it opens up doors left... right, up down, an all 4 others all over the shop

[@2Worlds_and_InBetween]

@@joshlewis575 what be able to call on the quark gluon plasma, and draw on that to rearrange the energetic value into anything. cos we _are_ nature its not something we hold in a test tube

[@ultravidz]

What bugs me is the assumption that if we can only understand the universe deeply enough, then we can manipulate it at that level too. I really wish that were the case.

[@_John_P]

It is not an assumption, it is the way every piece of technology works, by understanding the details of physical phenomena and subsequently exploiting it.

[@ultravidz]

John P Even now, engineering lags far behind physics. The gap only gets wider as new physics is discovered. Even if we know the “source code”, there are energy levels we simply cannot access. We should expect certain properties of the universe to be virtually unreachable for any practical purpose.

[@_John_P]

@@ultravidz You gave the answer already and it is time.

[@Zeriel00]

@@_John_P OP is right. You're talking like we're able to exploit every phenomena that we learn about. We can't, we can't possibly comprehend or harness something like a singulariy and going faster than light defies the very laws of the universe.

[@_John_P]

@@Zeriel00 No one is talking about the examples you gave.

[@mancavecentral13]

Lex, I like your shirt and tie combo much more than the normal black and white

[@zamokwakhesishi6528]

This is a high level conversation and it's rather difficult to follow

[@jimluebke3869]

Could it be that the universe is computational, but only up to a point? I'm still wondering how Chaos (sensitivity to small changes in initial conditions) works into this.

[@thebeautifulones5436]

In Australian "rooted the whole thing" means something else entirely.

[@3rdrock]

Instant snigger, every time.

[@tonys3165]

Geez mate Don't tell everyone our secrets!

[@senorbullflag7346]

A very smart man. I hope he’s right and manages to solve the light speed barrier problem. My (admittedly flawed) common sense mind tells me the universe probably isn’t fundamentally computational and that mathematics is merely a system we humans use to make calculations based upon known variables to predict unknown variables. Are mathematicians and physicists mistaking the mathematics for the reality when they say the universe is fundamentally computational or is the mathematics a reflection of the “machine code” of the universe? Interesting questions. I hope to be proven wrong.

[@housetheunstoppablessed4846]

The fact that our mathematics is able to describe the universe so well though.

[@seanmccall7277]

Highly interesting. I love listening to Wolfram.

[@iakobkv271]

is he your Wolfram?

[@lalonguecarabine4952]

All these questions, tests, hypothesis, theories, scientists will climb this seemingly insurmountable peak..to find philosophers sitting at the top waiting.

[@JakeyPoo1996]

Once a month or so i have these "out of body experiences." Ill go to bed and before i know it, it feels like im being sucked through a vortex or tunnel and then i find myself in a location like my room but im actually dreaming. I domt get to explore long because before i know it im sucked back into my bed but its a crazy wonderful experience. I wonder how i could become more easily suscepable to this experience??

[@mikehill1193]

If cern does create a tiny black hole , can they use that to warp gravity to make propulsion similar to the faver Tic tac UFO?

[@Grapevine1999]

Hacking the machine code would also allow for traveling back in time, although it would not necessarily allow for a time traveler. History could be rewound without all the energy required to rewind the movement of every atom in the “ real” universe. An interesting question: would history replay forward without change or would the universe move along a new and different timeline

[@daylesuess552]

What machine code?

[@prathamraina9445]

you can do both. Using game as an analogy, you can override the file or save this level as a new file.

[@imback3200]

I'll get right on that. Should have the answer in a couple of hundred years.

[@Sonofsol]

Lot of experts in the comment section, as always.

[@jd35711]

yep. he may very well be a crank, but he'd written three books on particle physics by age 14 and got his phd in the subject at 20 - I'm a pretty bright guy but i don't pretend to know enough to pass judgment on someone like that.

[@theknave4415]

What I hear you saying: Everyone is ignorant except for yourself. Do you listen to what you're saying? Do you think about it, first?

[@Sonofsol]

The Knave is that really how you interpreted that?

[@egor.okhterov]

Imagine there are experts on this planet. Now imagine they watch KZbin. Now try to think what is the subset of all of the videos would these experts watch?

[@Scoob505]

@@Sonofsol lol

[@carloorelli3538]

I believe one day we'll be able to travel faster than light because C is the speed limit "inside" space. But if we create a "bubble" around a starship that puts it out of space itself, there will be no limit to speed travel. It's like supercavitation for underwater torpedoes. It will be something like HYPERCAVITATION!

[@kapilasaurenman8961]

One of the great filters

[@gpn854]

It needs to be , ''Beam me up , Scotty '' . Not just travel faster than the speed of light .

[@christopherfrost3333]

Pretty sure the way that works is breaking down the code and that of someone, and putting it on the other side, theirs been videos on that by PBS, and they can’t figure out if you would be a “ new person”/. Copy of you. Or if you would be “you”

[@rickysanchez8143]

Exactly

[@the_hanged_clown]

theoretically possible, but just as likely to kill and clone you if it actually is possible... no I'd rather simply be cloned. anyone see Multiplicity starring Michael Keaton? HILARIOUS take on cloning

[@justaman5418]

who says you need a craft to travel through the universe or speed of light ohh SCIENCE lmfao we might as well still be in the victorian age

[@willharper8056]

GG

[@thechunkiestmonkey6887]

This guy is gonna blow up. Millions will be watching soon.

[@sneak-a-leek2135]

I’ve rewound this video 10 times and I feel like I get even more confused after each time I watch the clip.

[@venkatbabu186]

When you see light mass is trying to get to a relative zero point distribution.

[@cristopherpruitt191]

The problem with math is that it's like pouring an acid solution on a block of cheese. When the sum of the total remains elusive, maybe it's because all you have left is that which dissolved reality.

[@replynotificationsdisabled]

Sound/vibration in super dense/exotic mediums can be theoretically faster than light. Neutron star/black holes

[@Darhan62]

I'm sure that if we get a really deep understanding of the nature of physical reality we'll be able to do whatever we want with engineering. We'll be able to rewrite the rules, at least locally, and all that science fiction stuff will become real: force shields, tractor beams, gravity plating, warp drives, etc...

[@DanielHorton-oz6rp]

I honestly believe that if one could enter a blackhole directly, through the center you would come out with the explosion of the supernova that created it.

[@LockeLeon]

Wolfram has been very inspiring for me so far.

[@teslafanboy7197]

4:43 Guest: “I’m Giving a talk at NASA for what fatter than-light-travel would look like, I haven’t figured it out yet.” Lex: *🤷‍♂️😎”You’ve got two weeks.”

[@albertbenavidez3583]

How many times can you possibly say computational in a minute?

[@BryanChance]

A way to travel faster than light is the use of consciousness and technology. It doesn't involve worm holes, negative energy.or some exotic propulsion. In fact you're not really traversing any distance. You would just use consciously to say where you want to be and you appear there.

[@boouyayme]

Your mind can use your hands to text. Your mind can use the phone to text. But your mind cannot send a text to someone’s phone without the medium of technology. We can’t travel faster then light if the technology isn’t advanced enough to do it.

[@jimluebke3869]

One implication of Copernicus' work is that you could go to the Moon. Implication of Wolfram: we can go to other stars?

[@robertlaporte2998]

New idea gravity is like a rubber band.When we stretch it it catapolts us rearry fast in that vacuum.Zero g- force.

[@artking7883]

@theartistbk check out canvas paintings of divine consciousness

[@rh-paving4642]

Looks cold there

[@broughy23]

I don't have a fucking clue what these guys are talking about but I still enjoy listening to it

[@anywallsocket]

We know heat isn't 'random' - statistical physics is overtly heuristic. Computational irreducibility ends up making the same implication about what it can't compute anyway.

[@kariboo84]

Sounds pretty much like Jean-Pierre Petit "Janus" theory, negative mass, faster speed of light...

[@MrND7]

Why aren’t these amazing minds having a blast of DMT?

[@anttam117]

Because the realities that dawn on people during a DMT trip would probably shatter much of the hubris that goes on during these conversations, amazing as they are, and that wouldn't be a good thing for the ego. So there's that....

[@thomaspappas8946]

@@anttam117 That is probably a big truth

[@tjcogger1974]

@@anttam117 I don't see any hubris here. He's trying to convey concepts. He's not making it about himself

[@squareroot1697]

Wow in this podcast

[@chadmiller1120]

I believe we are thinking to hard about it.

[@hmvenom]

No pet lack holes please.... Awww so cute 🕳! Okay, maybe one ❤️

[@jimluebke3869]

Good luck, sir.

[@jakespina3482]

Turn empty planets into life for anyone

[@xannyphantom8864]

Whats the speed of thought

[@firstlylastly9961]

42

[@xannyphantom8864]

Is 42 alot?

[@jd35711]

surprisingly slow if you're talking literal nerve impulses.

[@MacarthurLouissaint-rz7tl]

Will we ever discover warp drive

[@mickmalkemus5019]

Vacuum Gravity Hypothesis Space tends to fill an area evenly. Mass displaces local space. Gravity is the force of space displaced by mass. Mass creates a vacuum of space and space seeks to fill the vacuum. Mass attracts mass and but not space.

[@ng-marc]

Planck speed in which entangled particles communicate is already faster than light. Why is scale related to speed limit? Hmm

[@TheRealWes]

Please reinvite Stephe. Very sympathic person

[@wolphramjonny7751]

An amazing thinker

[@phillipfracke2997]

This gentleman has consumed too many walnuts

[@manit77]

If that's what it takes to become a genius like Wolfram, give me some.

[@MichaelSmith-cl1uo]

I like what I'm listening to... but after the first min where is this filmed ! Lol

[@whattha_huh]

Fun Fact: A "warp drive" that barely achieves 1% of the speed of light would STAR TREK the solar system, hands down.

[@TheEmergingPattern]

Yes, at the bottom it should be as simple as possible. Otherwise nothing would happen. There must be a mechanism and therefore should be describ(e)able. Maybe part of the equation is out of our realm of perception, intelligent guesses are needed..

[@MahkyVmedia1]

Ooooh. Now I understand.

[@pawelrybka6552]

Is there really only one key question, the one?

[@pawelrybka6552]

The ecologists will conquer.

[@feudist]

Who is the Kwisatz Haderach?

[@josephsmith6777]

I feel the plank length in this and classical movent isnt the way the micro world its pixalated and thr holographic principle i think may be the way

[@aha6500]

Ebry time we do we manipulate do do we make every time manipulate.

[@bradkemble]

It is not hacked, it is given. We had to earn it from the powers that be.

[@tmmmedia731]

Zero point energy field. Since it cannot be created or destroyed this field is of pure potential energy

[@andrewnoblett9510]

Faster than light travel every atom in eternity is

[@oryxchannel]

the vile vortices

[@Cliff_P]

Underlying structure is the quantum vacuum. Matter must be perturbations in this

[@davetaitt1528]

Maybe we'll surf black holes, and that becomes a thing.

[@zachvisage5297]

the brain can fire neurons to cause the human body to commit an act instantly maybe we shouldn't think of moving at the speed of light but at the autonomous speed of the human brain! Of course in order to make something autonomous we will likely need to create a system that can compute the necessary data such as ai possibly?

[@scottgeddes5901]

Once you put electricity into your theories you will come up with a different picture of how thing are connected

[@Musky809]

Probably very obvious, but Lex, why does the photons travel with the speed they do, and why is that the utter limit?

[@pikiwiki]

"if we know how the universe works how can we engineer it." hoo boy

[@3dprepper150]

Lex must be getting his black curtains dry cleaned

[@MilMin203]

Take a shot every time you hear computational irreducibility.

[@mubashir7343]

You know what’s faster than light ? My impulse of clicking on any video where anything is faster than light

[@zachvisage5297]

Maybe that's it exactly the brain can fire neurons to cause the human body to commit an act instantly maybe we shouldn't think of moving at the speed of light but at autonomous speed of the human brain!

[@mubashir7343]

@@zachvisage5297 are you onto something that I might have divulged

[@zachvisage5297]

@@mubashir7343 precisely

[@mubashir7343]

@@zachvisage5297 a guru once said human thought can reach the farthest corners of universe in the exact moment that it starts its journey

[@cristig243]

R.I.P. Relativity. The speed of light is already proven not to be invariant c .

[@josephsmith6777]

I really like the penrose diagram

[@sinebar]

But to travel faster than light you would need to get around a fundamental law of physics V = Distance/Time.

[@ericg3810]

Thanks captain obvious.

[@Sonofsol]

Lol

[@gunslinginggringo]

Was this filmed in a jail ?

[@Chris-op7yt]

No. Science does not equate with computation and become replaced by it, because convenient for your spin.

[@Eric-qp7rx]

Dr. Jack Sarfatti said he figured out the mathematics of the physics at use in the "Tic Tac" UFO encounter with the USS Nimitz.. Its beyond by understanding but its based off of the skin of the craft being comprised with Meta-materials layered with different metals and charged which allow the craft to do incredible things without effecting the occupants or being restrained by G forced, speed of light, etc. Heres a video of him explaining it: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iICtaZuHd6l7gK8

[@LofiWurld]

The word emergent is emergent

[@blakethomassegura2207]

Here’s a thought . Imagine the stars are elastic strings that weave into a basket shaped earth. Then you push the earth and it’s slightly heavier on one side so it alternates it’s currents as it swings and twist and untwist as the strings tighten and release like lungs taking air in and release it .The colors from the stars meet as they twist together and make white light which would spiral down every 12 hours then change direction. From the view point on earth you would see a sun rise and sun set and a spiraling universe that seems to expand and we reach new expanses of exploration and shift water flow with dams and man made island and carbon emissions. Now imagine that the multi universe all exist together on earth but just in different paths made from the spiral of twist light paths cause from the shifting of strings which is the DNA of the universe and which is why our dna is modeled the way it is. A twisted spiral of a multi verse and all you have to do is fly is the motion in which the strings open and you can reach any dimension you want without and shuttle. I you take a piece of would were a knot is and find the thing black lines which are the paths the water circulates itself through the tree . Then you follow that line as you twist the wood and tilt it as if you were a roller coaster on a track of DNA you will start to see the lines start to mesh together in separate 3D image that look like your are opening gates to different worlds . You can do the same things with trees as you see the light shine through. You can follow one path of light and keep twisting with that light and you will find that trees are not random sand you will find the worm holes that light twists itself around and every tree twist to that pattern from one tree to another and you will realize that they all twist at a diagonal in sequence with how the wormholes enter and leave the tree before it . You can do that at night and see a glowing DNA and as you follow it up to a full moon you will see the moon come apart into the moon phases as the separation of lenses follow that path. That when you realize the moon is extremely close and much smaller than it is presented to be . Just imagine if you could actually do that wink wink . But just be careful because once you open a door what’s on the other side can see you . You could realized that every fairytale came from seeing through windows and mirrors from these dimensions and could make you scared of the dark . One things I found funny was the beautiful woman is the first moon face and then the man in the moon the Thomas the train face haha .. I mean if you could actually do this. No drugs needed

[@mattmartinez6613]

Nice

[@Aangel452]

Meaning no disrespect, but the position of computational known steps has a stopping point that takes us no further. As a scientist I am always looking for the next way forward with anticipation and excitement for final understanding of past theories and conclusions to the next big discoveries. We must keep striving for knowledge, and take two steps foreword instead of 1 step backwards every year. We are now in 2020 and the lushly funded areas of discovery are excelling. I am on our your side, our uni grads who become professors, inventors, discoverers, world changes for the betterment of man. Science is a compassionate, creative, exciting world to be in if you have the funds. Please civilians all over the world tell your governing departments to give money to good science, which in turn the people’s suffering will ease.

[@joshua023156]

Get this man into Area 51

[@scottgeddes5901]

Electricity a great deal it can connect the micro to the macro

[@poplionandrew5803]

black hole. vacuum cleaner. engineering impact. historic implications.

[@ivarsvilums]

I remember reading many years ago a short story about an experimenter who successfully made a wormhole. Unfortunately it opened into intersteller space and quickly sucked him and everything around him through it. Eventually, it was realized that global atmospheric pressure was decreasing and when it was determined that the winds raging across the planet were all moving to where the experimenter had been located, one intrepid entrepreneur had two bells made which he had brought in from opposite sides and sealed the leak. People wondered at first why he had a spigot on the bells. Turns out he then became a rich man creating a thriving business piping high grade vacuum for use in industry, science, and even homes for use in vacuum cleaners and trash cans. It was a fun read.

[@michaelguimaraes6201]

It is all zeros and ones

[@brymstoner]

Quantum superposition is even more interesting.

[@silentbullet2023]

Give him his Nobel before he invents a better prize.

[@stubbler1969]

Was this interview done in a prison?

[@nsfeliz7825]

wolfram stole my shirt. damnit.

[@BBoldGaming]

You can travel through the future by deep meditation

[@thomastoivonen9375]

7 minutes in I realized I have no idea what they are talking about.