Trekyards EP274 - USS William Clark

[@dadrian]

Chris here, thanks for the video guys! 1. The big window is the Two-Forward, I've actually put a bar in there. 2. All the Windows are the same height (actual floor height). They look so big because the lower side of the saucer section is very angled

[@dadrian]

I'm open to all suggestions btw. The ship isn't finished, it's just at a point where I wanted to hear your suggestions to make it better.

[@MrSheckstr]

Chris Struber I hope you don't take any criticism personally. When people point out the one or two things they don't like it's assumed but rarely said that that means that they actually LIKED the 98% of the ship that they don't talk about

[@dadrian]

steven heckert thank you but don't worry, as I said, this is still an unfinished model and I love to hear the feedback so I can further improve my ship.

[@MrSheckstr]

Chris Struber so as far as the window goes (and acknowledging you clearly stated its on deck two) This is just my opinion but I think it has some of the wisdom of Solomon to it 1 there is no reason a starship can't have Windows on the bridge 2 past a certain size (I'm saying three decks) there is little legitimate reason for having a forward facing window on the bridge THUS 3 if you want of forward facing window on the bridge of your ship you should put the extra effort into your design to have armored panels on the exterior hull to cover those windows (and possibly internal panels or screens as well) I feel this is a reasonable compromise between safety and security on one hand and the occasional desire or theoretical need to be able to see out without external visual aids

[@MrSheckstr]

As far as "Two forward " being a bar might I offer a suggestion? Make that instead a conference room/ Captains mess and put your large social gathering place on the underside of the saucer, since you have such a large numbers of Windows there it looks like that is where you put the majority of your crew cabins anyways. That way a rousing round of "steady boy steady" doesn't disturb gamma watch on the bridge.

[@jonmyers8046]

This is friggin awesome. Really brings together evolutionary changes. The saucer seperation and secondary warp core are the icing on the cake. Definately looks like something built between the end of movie era and the Enterprise C. wanna see this in TV and/or movies!

[@Gaderath2781]

Just as a tie in to another franchise.....the Earth Alliance president in Babylon 5 who went a little crazy was called William Morgan Clark. It was the first thing that came into my head when I saw the title of this episode :)

[@jehb8945]

This is extremely well done I like everything from the warp drive placement to the triple hull separation the nacelle design and all the little details that were put into this. It's clearly Star Trek but it also has the designers mark.

[@jef_3006]

The more I think about and look at it, the more I love every aspect of this ship. The perfect bridge between the Constellation / Enterprise B and the Enterprise C.

[@Bill23799]

Nicely done Chris. It looks like something Mr Scott would have built in his garage on weekends and his days off.

[@11nolaboi]

the more I look at it, the more I love it! fantastic attention to detail. extremely handsome ship & name.

[@brentbartley6838]

Its like a Constellation but swapped lower engines for a secondary hull and rotated the nacelles 90 degrees. I like it. Very Galaxy looking lower saucer.

[@Mayvau]

Great design. Really like the neck part above and below the saucer. Also wondering if the large deck at the shuttle bay might not "close up" to provide more defense if needed. It sure appears to be close to fitting that semi circle.

[@keytide]

A great design. I like it a lot. Hopefully we will see it in an animation in the not too distant future.

[@seanbrown207]

I like the design. The Federation elements have a fresh and creative look that feels very fitting. The ship feels very appropriate as a Lost Era ship and I'm intrigued with it being a deep space explorer after Star Trek VI. From the description, I see this design as the first test of what would become deep space, multi-year, autonomous, self-reliant, and extremely capable explorer that the Galaxy Class would eventually fill. I also see it as the capable version than the "budget" Constellation Class (as I remember, Constellation Class would is contemporaneous and also be a deep space explorer). I also like the combined elements from different eras. I've never necessarily been a fan of the idea that every single ship off the factory line has brand spanking new parts and tech for every single part of the ship. There need to be some iterative steps and workhorses in the fleet. A few things I would change: - I'm intrigued with the Constitution style shuttle door but it would be nice to modify them slightly to not look exactly like a TOS Constitution style shuttle door. Do something to make it look like it's an updated version. - The proportion of the saucer impulse engines seem too big. If the impulse drive is so massive to need that large space then why the inclusion of two more teeny-tiny ones in the pylons? I think it would fix the design to make the saucer impulse ones smaller or give them a different shape. I get that the saucer may need some massive engine power when separated from the engineering hull but something just seems off. - I did a spot check against an Ambassador and Excelsior sizes and it seems to be on par with the Ambassador, which seems really large for the era. It doesn't look like it has the same internal volume as an Ambassador but something about the saucer proportions seems too big. It would make more sense if the saucer was reduced in size by 15%. I don't see Starfleet building starships that rival an Ambassador in sheer spread at this point.

[@riochcogan8913]

I love the tiny detail of the registry number just below the shuttle bay. I think overall it's a great concept design. All it's features were used in later ships.

[@kwaktak]

I like the idea of the nacelles not being connected to the secondary hull but it needs to have quad nacelles like the Stargazer. Engineering would have to be in the dorsal though which means that the secondary hull would have more room for cargo and hangar space.

[@AljonGo]

I love the channel! I've always been a fan of TMP-era ships and designs and this one is reminiscent of it. Keep up the great work!

[@georgemanley3755]

There's kind of a "testbed" feel to it... kind of like "we're on our way to Ambassador" feel. Maybe a little counterproductive to put a secondary navigational deflector near the warp engine ramscoops, though. Of course, it could be powered down during times when they're taking in interstellar hydrogen. But again, it'd be better elsewhere, like the front of the saucer.

[@williamclarke3248]

If only it had a "e" on the end LOL

[@terifarley4770]

Front view is coolest, definately a cool Pacific 201!

[@nukedathlonman]

Given the time period suggested, I think it makes total sense. Remove the secondary hull, turn the nacelles on there side and add two more nacelles down from the ones on the ship and instant USS Stargazer predecessor. For sure the windows on the hull look a little exaggerated, but overall a very well executed design overall. :-) On the docking clamps, I did some thinking, and I figure the saucer might have some large clamps that one can't see where it inserts into the neck.

[@ravissary79]

yeah the stretched windows aren't too long, they're just slanted due to the angle of the hull.

[@tomcatm16]

Awesome intro. James Horner soundtrack with the Undiscovered Country bridge. Made my day. Also, I agree with your takes on the design.

[@Tounushi]

A perfect middle-ground between the Ambassador and the Constitution, as far as the major hull segments are concerned.

[@slighter]

It looks like a ship on which Picard would have served directly after finishing academy. A contemporary to the Ent-C

[@watchthe1369]

The hull form is kind of the beginning for the larger Command Cruiser in STO... The saucer looks like stacked plates.

[@xXKirkSoloXx]

Really like the in-between phaser strips. I like the overall slightly-pre-Ambassador-era design theme. This design really stands out from other movie era fan/Beta-canon (I'm thinking of FASA) ships.

[@xheralt]

I'm thinking the elongated windows on the "floor" of the primary hull might be just that. Transparent floor panels, such as can be found on the observation decks of certain skyscrapers, such as the Sears Tower and/or Hancock Building in Chicago.

[@stevenewman1393]

🖖😎👍A very nice and cool looking ship indeed, A very good and informatively explained and very well executed indeed guys 👌...

[@SumDumGy]

I'd like to thank Chris for helping provide a Discovery-free video for a change.

[@power543]

Hay Discovery is topical...cant say i havent been burned out by editing video after video but its done wonders for the channel with another 150,000 bonus views to the channel this last 2 or so week! amazing!

[@SumDumGy]

I can imagine so, Samuel! It proves the point that despite the controversy, all the haters are still so interested in the series and will likely watch it, regardless of their protests. I've seen the viewer counts on those videos so I'm happy for you guys. Personally, I'm just not at all interested. I watched a few of your vids on the series, hoping I might change my mind, but I'm too turned off by it and can't anymore. I know you'll be covering the show for some time to come, being the only active Trek during your channel's history, and I get that. Just don't leave us olde tyme folks behind in the process! Keep up the good work you're doing.

[@gmon78]

Very nice ship. Kind of new yet familiar. I really like it.

[@BrightStarLine2022]

One of my favorite fan made ships

[@brittoncooper1251]

This a very Constellation-class feel, but with the lower nacelles replaced with a secondary hull. I like it!

[@jesse33cdn]

When I see the talent that is out there, I just had a thought...I think CBS should of had a contest to design the Discovery! I think we would have gotten a better ship and it would have made fans more excited about the show! Also, it would have been cheaper for CBS!

[@gusty9053]

feels around the Enterprise C era (old design by TNG)

[@katakisLives]

The secondary hull looks like that of a Constitution class from the front the saucer section looks a bit like the excelsior, the nacelles are one of the most interesting parts of the ship, they kinda look like modified refit era nacelles with the red bussard collectors at the front but the blue grilling is a bit more TNG shuttlecraft

[@christianroberts8134]

The neck is great and I really like the deck at the back of the shuttle bay hangars!

[@ciciro6]

Looks like Pacific 201if it where made around the same time as the constellation class.

[@randymiller1330]

The center tube in between the warp nacells looks like a 3 way cross between communication array, torpedo launchers with a mega phaser like the miranda class ship had...

[@WaybackTECH]

I think this fits in very well as an early evolution of what is later seen with the Enterprise-C. I think I would have just had the secondary hull separate, I really like that better than the saucer section itself, it just doesn't look right without the saucer! But it still looks great without the secondary there. No reason you couldn't have a backup warp core in the saucer or even in that bit between the nacell's. On the bridge you can see where the window would be, there is a bit of recess there which to me would mean the bridge has a window, but has a blind that comes down over the window, which I think makes a lot of sense. I like the idea of a mess hall deck right under the bridge so that it doesn't take the officers there as long to get back to their post under an emergency.

[@brentbartley6838]

It's cool, an amalgam of the refit Connie and Constellation

[@richardtrue2786]

If it's from after St 6 then it's about 50 years to soon for phaser strips ncc 1701 c is the first ship to use them

[@shinjofox]

Good looking ship. Fits into Feddie design nicely.

[@sarreqteryx]

23:30 those aren't phaser strips. those are strips with LOTS of ball turrets on them.

[@empressadria7009]

It reminds me of the Pacific 201 with the central pylon holding everything together.

[@solarflea4115]

Can you guys do a top 10 fan designs?

[@power543]

Way to many designs to do that!!!

[@jesse33cdn]

power543 top 100?

[@solarflea4115]

power543 I only mean designs that you guys have done videos on.

[@sr3473]

Actually the windows on the bottom of the saucer do work since the actual room is recessed back from the window. We've seen this in tng. Also what makes you think artificial gravity would be reversed? The whole turbolift system would be messed up if that was the case. Just lower the window size by a quarter and it's fine.

[@dandanjobarnicles]

Yeah, it looks Ambassador contemporary to me.

[@anthonylowder6687]

It would be interesting to have seen a pic of the ship completely without the secondary hull. The shot of the secondary hull separating from the neck section was a good idea of what the ship would look like without it.

[@watchthe1369]

The secondary hull looks like the farmboy's ship in "Battle of the planets" I think, Maybe Battle of the Stars" That also explains why the impulse engine on the saucer are so big, GTFA from the imminent bang.

[@enterprise-h312]

6:12 The nacelles certainly feel very advanced. Much more advanced than say the Excelsior-class. 11:30 So how big would that make the impulse engines on this design compared to the ones on the Galaxy-class? I like it when designs acknowledge that miniaturization comes with advancement. 26:48 Doesn’t Starfleet Battles only give the Interstellar Concordium rear-facing torpedo launchers?

[@ravissary79]

the bridge area is enormous!!! It must be nestled between several other rooms all around it due to scale.

[@garykyle3737]

I wish you guys could make it down to the rose city comic Con in Portland Oregon one year for meet and great

[@benw9949]

I like this, however, I have a critique on the lighting, shading, texturing. Most of these have too little contrast on the light versus shade of the model. The paint job or texturing could use some variation also. The ship needs a bit more polish and refinement for that. -- I agree with Stuart on the windows on the underside of the saucer. -- Overall, nice design; good job!

[@dadrian]

it definitly needs more work in shading and texturing. I've used a lot of light in this renderings, so that everything is easily visible for the discussion.

[@The1ReviewBoard]

It’s funny that Sam should mention 5 years ago the William Clark’s bussards as having Titan vibes. Now we have a Titan-A that looks retro.

[@isfj1009]

It looks cool. I mean, those primary hull windows are a bit on the long side I think. Compared to the secondary hull windows. And so long as that front window thingy isn't the bridge...COOL!!!!

[@jameslewis2635]

The part at the top looks like it could possibly detach to become a warp shuttle. That however would leave the main part lacking in warp capability and as such it would make more sense for the engineering section to also have a couple of warp nacels. This would suggest to me a military ship with a detachable long range scout craft. That would suit the movie era technology looking at the warp shuttle that transferred Spock to the Enterprise in The Motion Picture.

[@mulitball]

Overall love it. One design element I might change is "2 Forward". The size of those windows is huge and obviously no armor. If the shields fail, one decently placed torpedo shot through the windows will detonate inside the core of the saucer section. Would blow out the bridge above it, as well as major damage to Deck 3 which is likely where the top of the main computer core is. Even if the bridge crew survived the detonation, they'd be cut off from the rest of the ship. Ouch. It's very ST design to have your bridge exposed, so in this respect the design is very consistent with ST norms. Again, absolutely terrific design.

[@dreadedpixel9022]

Kinda reminds me of the Pacific 201

[@johnmogavero8156]

Eaglemoss please !

[@aaronstanding6348]

The saucer section upside down looks NX-class from the front view

[@williamclark3280]

Really Like the ship...LOVIN the name!!!

[@raxsavvage]

looks like it fits in before the enterprise C by i'd say 20 years? i like it.

[@Grayphus]

Nice ship!!!!

[@robinvan1983]

nice design. so where is the the engineering bay? in the saucer, Neck or the 2nd hull?

[@MrSheckstr]

robinvan1983 at 21:30 the way the warp core section is ejected it would imply it's in the secondary

[@raijinmeister]

Looks a lot like an Exeter Class. Talking about the design of the parts and not the ship arrangement.

[@Capronice]

I really like this ship. Its a great step before Enterprise D.

[@leohale6449]

Did you notice the Captains Office window in the back of the upper area you supposed to be the Bridge?

[@giftheck]

Are you guys going to do the final Enterprise-A from Beyond at some point? There's some definite interesting changes and I've seen screenshots of the model which show detail that's not obvious in the film.

[@power543]

yes :)

[@chipholman3860]

The rooms on the struts could be astronomy labs. Big windows for observation and optical data collection.

[@dadrian]

That's excatly what I had in mind for the rooms on the struts ;)

[@Ziplock9000]

They would not study astronomy through large windows. This ain't the 19th century

[@Toycoma]

Looks good when the 2nd haul comes off.

[@randymiller1330]

The center "tube" between the nacells looks like a mega phaser to me..but im curious to find out what it actually is..

[@richardtrue2786]

Enterprise B has aft torpedo lunchers under the shuttle bay on both side of the tractor beam admitter

[@gallendugall8913]

Love everything except the glass bottom boat windows, but it's not nearly as bad as the Universe. The saucer being in the middle of the neck is super spiffy.

[@morganb6717]

overall, i am most definately a fan of this design. even in its current iteration, i would happily fly the crap outta this in STO. i'd like to state my peeves, as there are only a few. - the main impulse engines could be draw closer together, perhaps, so that the wash trails cleanly under the struts. their width also seems a tad excessive. - the tertiary hull's impulse engines might do with a little squaring up/reshaping. - you could halve the total number of windows presented and i'd still likely think there are too many, on the neck especially. it is an exploratory vessel, not a sight seeing cruiseliner. - the large window spanning the deck beneath the bridge, consider something along the lines of an observation level ala the Odyssey class ship bridges found in STO. the idea of a ship's lounge located directly under the bridge on a ship this size doesn't feel like a logical placement to me. - perhaps slightly altering the secondary hull's shape so as not to directly mirror a Constitution's secondary hull, but this would be grasping at the tiniest bits of complaint. everything else i can approvingly nod towards with an added "damn fine job". that's right, i don't even mind it lacking a rear torpedo system.

[@The_Irish_Fox]

Personally I love this ship

[@90lancaster]

With that window being so large perhaps it would need an armoured cover to raise up during red alert. Perhaps the phaser strips would look nicer pushed out to the sides so they are just clear of the lettering - then they'd allow 2 to have an easy firing arc both forwards and to the sides. Likewise the side ones could do with being pushed back a little bit - I realise why they are where they are to match the side decorative cage style black bars - but perhaps a design balance can be achieved with some extra thrusters on the back 3rd of the of saucer sides. i don't dislike the way they balance as is with the impulse crystals - but I just think they distract from the ships name & number a bit. Other than that the only tiny complaint I have is the Nacelles are a bit plain in terms of surface detail. I Like it though very much it fits in well with the same sort of thinking that led to the Ambassador Class being built. It looks like the sort of ship that would have been very useful when Picard was starting his career.

[@Tar-Numendil]

I'm thinking right before 2300. Say 2299? It is nearly as long as an Ambassador class. I think 6 years between the Excelsior refit and this makes sense.

[@jef_3006]

I think I'd say 2309-2314. Parts of this ship are pretty advanced.

[@andnowtheweather2948]

I really love this design! (Although I'm still not sure what the blue glowy thing on top is - secondary deflector? Sensors?) Chris, are these pictures available anywhere? Is there a website? I can't find anything...

[@andnowtheweather2948]

The era between the movies and TNG has always needed some more love, so thank you :)

[@JEDAI501ST]

1st I would like to say that the ship is a very nice design. However that being said, I do see a few places that he could have fixed. Note that this is just my opinion.1. The size difference between the Windows and the shuttlebay. The windows say Enterprise D, while the shuttlebay says Enterprise A. 2. The impulse engines are a little too big. Have them shortened and on the outside, make a little extra saucer stick out, so that they will face straight back. 3. At the end of the warp nacelles, have them glowing blue. Other than those, it's a very good looking ship.

[@spudzillah_6175]

When is the full eps on the defiant coming out or is the data file the full ep

[@power543]

the Defiant full episode will be out this year as she is our next planned one after our last one on the Galaxy Class. Certainly no the Data file is not eh full episode ^.^

[@carlhannjr1062]

The saucer looks similar to the NX Enterprise upside down.

[@stevenbaumann8692]

I would put it in between the Enterprise B and C, post movies. I love this design. I don't like the nacelles or the impulse engines.

[@ravissary79]

the windows underneath are stretched ya silly people. The ones on the side are not. Hence why the ones under the disc are 3 times longer.

[@richardajoy79]

I have a great many designs, but none of mine are 3D as I am useless at modeling. I do enjoy seeing fan-made designs. This ship would look better if it was a Constitution-class refit with a Miranda-class torpedo bay connecting the nacelles.

[@patrickradcliffe3837]

Not enough of of the dorsal strut attached to the primary hull. Looks like a weak point.

[@alancarter3142]

Good looking ship

[@emiliogreenwood8190]

Nice ship almost makes me want to make my own then again maybe I should

[@NephritduGrey]

Hm, if the author had done it more TOS-y and decreased the size a bit it would have been a great design for the Discovery. The upper part could look a bit more Nx-y and the secondary as is and it would be a nice evolution overall. Oh well. :D

[@DrewLSsix]

Marcus the disco predates tos significantly.

[@NephritduGrey]

The Disco looks quite horrible and doesn't really fit the rest of the fleet though(as the Trekyards videos show with all their short clips recently), unlike this design.

[@DrewLSsix]

Marcus. What fleet? Theres one known ship from the Cage amd tos points in canon and nothing at all between the nx enterprise era and the Cage era. So about 80 years with nothing to go by except the constitution and THAT ship is supposed to be something awesome different and new even a decade after it launched.

[@NephritduGrey]

Well we have the Nx and the Connie, apparently the Daedalus class was a model in DS9 too, even though it's unnamed in the episode. Hm, what else? We have the K-7 Space Station, the USS Antares (freighter) in the remastered version okay this looks kinda blocky too but has TOs style nacelles, hm.. technically the USS Kelvin predates TOS and would supposed to be prime? So, yeah. feels out ofplace, similar to how the ENT-D felt out of place after/during the TMP period. And then again in the TMP period we see nothing similar to the Discovery either. the closest it would be would be kitbashs from alien ships or the Pre warp 5 delta flyer thing. Hm, maybe it's their fetish with Deltas that the ship even looks kinda similar to one? O.o

[@xheralt]

I didn't like the initial design of Discovery, but I've come around to liking the current version. Still will only watch the premiere because fuck the paywall. It's getting to the point where cable will be cheaper than collecting all the streaming services! Hating the Discovery is like hating Nickleback or hating disco; its cool to to say you hate it, but if you look at it honestly, it isn't that bad. Or at least, there is plenty out there far worse.

[@joewilly78]

Hey guys, what software do you and others use to design ships?

[@dadrian]

I can just talk about myself, I use Autodesk Maya. But if you want to start 3D modelling I recommend Blender, as it is free and as good as commercial software.

[@gyozakeynsianism]

Brilliant design.

[@jameskaufman8263]

I have a ship i designed back in 2009 by the name of the Diligence, but i never did find a means of getting it modeled \o/

[@kb_9215]

Hey guys love the channel! Have you gone over the Narendra class ship? It's an sto ship, Like a newer ambassador class. Would be cool!

[@reverendbernfriedaxewielde8443]

Someone call CBS! We found a better Discovery here!

[@Tar-Numendil]

Especially with Expedition being the class name.

[@seanm4095]

I know I'm nick picking here but saucer needs more windows....bit it is a gorgeous ship!

[@MrSheckstr]

I've got a bit of a problem with the registry number of 2073( but then again I've got a problem with the sloppy way registry numbers have been used in all things declared canon) It was assumed or presumed starship classes were assigned a bracket of registration numbers of 100( i.e. Constitution classes registry numbers were from 1700-1799) with the prototype of that class being the 00 of that block. And the only exception to that are for ships named for a predecessor (like the Enterprise) which kept the original registry number but added letter after it (it is my Assertion that even in those cases such legacy ships still are assigned a registry number relevant to its class thus the Enterprise A has secondary registry number of 17??, the enterprise B has a secondary registry of 20?? And the C,D,&E have a secondary registry relevant to their class of vessel) Thus the registry of the USS Clark would have to have a registry number in the 2100s at least

[@dadrian]

Ah, I did not know that! Maybe I'll change it for the next version.

[@MrSheckstr]

Chris Struber don't worry too much about it... there is no canonic rule.... and lazy writers and special effects artist have already violated the unwritten rule enough that any other aberration shouldn't matter if it's a number you like, go for it... and who know Maybe every century of numbers (or couple of centuries) can be said to represent an entire period of starfleet productions. After all if the plan was for there only to be a couple of dozen of any particular class of starship, there is little point in reserving and entire 100 block of numbers for each class. For all we know the entire 2000 series is meant for 4-5 classes of starships with the prototype of each class being 00,20,40,60,80? I believe in coming up with way to be as inclusive as possible rather than find silly excuses to exclude anything I don't like. Fair enough?

[@JEMHull-gf9el]

Cool ship! Yu guys must be the only people still using a hotmail account! lol The shuttle staging platform doesn't need to be thick. Its in zero gravity!

[@raya7816]

what do you think how many crew and if its a rescue ship how many MAX.

[@lnlraven079]

It looks like a Constellation, mixed with an Apollo Class frigate from the movie era [star trek alpha wiki] if the size is right it would be a step towards the Constellation class of starship [Stargazer, for a ship name]

[@EmpyreanFrost]

Pacific NCC-201. Integrity class. Fanfilm ship. USS Challenger NCC-2032 Ashanti class. FASA ship. :P That's what it reminds me of.

[@donaldhill3823]

Looks Great

[@laviliterthefirst]

The Windows make about as much sense as they did on any of the TNG ships lol, Name one place on the Ent.D that have body length windows outside of the ready room? I actually really like this great middle ground between TMP era and the ships floating around at wolf 359....though I think that center piece on the back of the saucer should be the impulse and the current impulse should be shuttle bays.

[@silvergriffen]

Please correct me if I am wrong, as I only recently found this page and started watching your content, but have y'all done a top ten least favorite ship episode? If not, would that be something y'all might consider doing? I've seen the top ten favorite, but it made me curious what your least favorite ships might be

[@silvergriffen]

Also, have you done an episode where you describe what your ultimate, customized, unique dream starship would look like?

[@MrSheckstr]

Thomas Sesko the only problem with a top ten disliked class of ship is that it's basically an episode that is all about negativity. There is so much negativity and bickering in the Star Trek extended family as it is that a episode devoted to least favorite would just explode all that negativity.

[@MrSheckstr]

Thomas Sesko and from what I would gather captain foley's fantasy ship is a TOS era three nacelle dreadnought .... No idea what the commander's favorite whip is

[@marty18weeksold]

It’s cool good work

[@davidnachbaur6805]

Thank you