you are saving me from entirely failing this class i wish all profs could teach like you do
@stephanievargas24035 жыл бұрын
OMG I freakingggg love you...I am currently studying for my masters in Linguistics and finallyyyyyyy I feel like I can actually understand syntax!!!!
@TreiberSeptim4 жыл бұрын
Stephanie Vargas That’s not fair i have to do this for my damn B.Ed in English, and the question I ask myself the most is Why the fuck do I need this for a B.Ed? I’m not studying linguistics :‘D
@yourway3823 жыл бұрын
@@TreiberSeptim hahaha
@theosoreos3 жыл бұрын
@@TreiberSeptim I relate to this so much that it hurtsssss
@TheTinyTimmyTimTim3 жыл бұрын
@@TreiberSeptim I have a midterm in 12 hours, I hope its going well for you haha.
@Miz_Meg7 ай бұрын
@tiberseptim8434 the very same for B.Ed and this is a core course kmt
@hasinivihangadesilva98767 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for the crystal clear explanation... You are a grade saver...
@jorgetrillo27643 жыл бұрын
You kind sir are a god among humans. Thank you so much, you are gonna save my degree.
@sebastianamado84046 жыл бұрын
Trev Tutor manages to explain Complementiser Phrases very clearly.
@maymesullivan4 жыл бұрын
This is very well organized, can I ask what app and/or software you used to draw?
@yourway3823 жыл бұрын
Yes please
@gionnifer2 жыл бұрын
7:15 so clutch right here, this helped so much
@ZapataMac4 жыл бұрын
Aren't you skipping T' and T before the VP?
@oliverioy94394 жыл бұрын
Great job. What application are you using for the presentation? It's perfect for the virtual classes nowadays.
@k-popaddict26667 жыл бұрын
How about T -> +pst (+past tense) and "died" becomes "die"? That was stated in the book i've been studying
@Trevtutor7 жыл бұрын
Yes, T' and T levels are explained in other videos. The focus of this one was just to introduce CPs so I did not worry about T movement.
@IsabellaReid4 жыл бұрын
Ok but his voice. 🔥
@yourway3823 жыл бұрын
😱
@이진희-p4e5 жыл бұрын
How helpful video is!!! Thank you so much!!!! I can completely understand this!!!!
@memegustalamusica7 жыл бұрын
Hello, I really liked your explanation. But still I have a very important question to do! Well I'm about to finish my degree and this is the only subject left. And I can't understand why or when CP is needed? Why generative grammaticians decided to use de CP if there is no Complementizer in a phrase. So for example in a phrase like "Have you seen her?" Why do we start the derivation from a CP? Does this mean we need to use ALWAYS CP as the main projection of a tree analysis? I would appreciate a quick answer for this :) thank you!
@Vivaldi46 жыл бұрын
My educated guess is that it could have something to do with the generative character of language = the fact that we could possibly build a neverending sentence. That allows us to include a clause (making it a constituent) into our neverending one making the one that was just included a complement of higher structure!? Than there would be a requirement to have a free slot for a complemetizer. BUT I am not 100% sure. I am new to GT grammar, X´ and all this stuff. Correct me if I am wrong. I am curious as well.
@agustinaquintero373 жыл бұрын
I have the same doubt
@awa15622 жыл бұрын
I have question but first I like to thank you its clear but my question is when we draws tree diagram and write cp at the first should we delete the cp in bottom and how the structure will be ?
@milipianetti8624 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your explanation! Very helpful
@sot11cat3 жыл бұрын
In 04:00 Did you purposely omit T’ -> T -> [+past] under the root TP ? Same question for the embedded TP. Shouldn’t it have a daughter T’, sister to DP, which in turn should have two daughters, a T and VP? Have u uploaded any tutorial on non-finite, especially infinitives and gerunds, in sentences like I ordered him to bring me wine. I cannot stop watching your videos. I hate ordering him. If not, it would be nice to make a video on that topic. Thanks for any response!
@yasirhashmi54003 жыл бұрын
Please tell me the types of sentence s whether these sentences having embeded clause or complementizer phrases are simple or complex
@soomasoomy857 жыл бұрын
Should we start drawing every tree with "CP"?
@MoneyMindTube3 жыл бұрын
What is TP , are they the same with IP -inflectional projection
@asadkamaljan8713 жыл бұрын
Great upload more videos on cp sir
@sadafriz57283 жыл бұрын
Can I contact you??? I am stuck in tree diagrams of CP
@MichaelWilliams26 жыл бұрын
Hi Trev! Thanks for uploading the video man you are awesome! Can I ask a quick question please? How do we know which verbs must take a CP as a complement? From the patterns followed it seems to be following any linking verbs? It seems quite counter-intuitive to create complementizer phrases for particular verb types under particular circumstances. Does this hypothesus suggest creating a Complementiser Phrase for every instance of such verbs? For example in the sentences: "I do not believe it" or 'I persuaded him' or 'I think he believes me' creates a fragment clause without noun or verb phrase. Thanks
@Trevtutor6 жыл бұрын
"I do not believe it" or 'I persuaded him' are complete sentences. 'I think he believes me' is a good example of a sentence that needs a CP. [I think [(that) he believes me]]. The complementizer "that" is optional in this case.
@MichaelWilliams26 жыл бұрын
I guess what I'm asking is, surely it would only be accurate (and probably easier) to determine the transitivity of a verb based on the antecedent context of the CP. For example in the sentence, 'John does know the answer' we have [John][does know the answer] creates "the answer" as an adverb phrase for "know". Whereas in the phrase "John does know the answer is yellow" creates "the answer is yellow" as a complemetiser phrase for the verb "know".
@Trevtutor6 жыл бұрын
Yeah some verbs have multiple complement options. In the first sentence you have "know" taking an NP complement, but in the second there is a CP complement. Verbs like "want", or "believe" will work the same. Sorry I didn't understand your question at first.
@MichaelWilliams26 жыл бұрын
Dude, awesome. Thank you so much for responding and so quickly as well! Thanks
@youssefmayadi86362 жыл бұрын
I want you to draw the tree for the sentence that contains adjunct
@wallflowers64894 жыл бұрын
Could you explain what is DP?
@YoussefOsse5 жыл бұрын
What I want to know is when the complementizer that is optional, and when it is obligatory. Although I know the answer intuitively, a syntactic account of this linguistic phenomenon would more practical and reliable.
@agustinaquintero373 жыл бұрын
Me too!! I asked the same. As in the case : the book(that) you bought
@MohamedAli-rd7rn2 жыл бұрын
Thanks a bunch for all your support, your e lectures are definitely useful. 👌 On top of that you are super extraordinary human beings ❤️ I really appreciate your time and you ❤️
@ashsoulmate3 жыл бұрын
thank you so much!
@vladotz7 жыл бұрын
Why do you use DeterminerPhrase now instead of simply NounPhrase for "I" or "John"?
@Trevtutor7 жыл бұрын
See DP Hypothesis video. NPs are actually DPs with the way constituents work.
@izazahmed34175 жыл бұрын
I just watched the DP hypothesis video. The DP contains a determiner as head of the phrase. But in the case of I or John, there is no determiner to begin with in the first place. I am confused.
@izazahmed34175 жыл бұрын
@@Trevtutor Can't we simply treat a proper noun or a pronoun as NP?
@xoTalim4 жыл бұрын
@@izazahmed3417 Idk if you still need an answer to this if you're still studying Syntax, but when I learned DPs, my prof told me that nouns in DPs ALWAYS need a determiner. If there isn't one (like in "John is happy"), then you would still draw a branch down as if there IS a determiner for John, label it D, and then where the word "the" would be, you'd just put the null symbol like he shows at 6:40 under "C".
@alexandrusuteu97314 жыл бұрын
How do I explain the role of CP in direct and indirect questions?
@jauyun8476 жыл бұрын
3:46 Do you use Verb Shell for "ditransitive verbs"?
@Trevtutor6 жыл бұрын
Not at this point. Maybe in an Advanced Syntax series.
@patrickkwakutwumappiah60412 жыл бұрын
what is the TP?
@HuongPhan-gx2sn Жыл бұрын
if "that" is a S in a sentence, for ex: That is the school where i was taught. How to draw a tree diagram of this sentence? Can you help me? Thank you
@burbuttercup Жыл бұрын
I love you so much
@sweetycamy6 жыл бұрын
So in the case of The man that eats pudding is full. Do we use NP to represent "that eats pudding"? do we not introduce that in a CP? I'm confused since this is a TP and has an adjunct
@Trevtutor6 жыл бұрын
"that eats pudding" is a CP-adjunct attached to the NP "man". There is movement within that TP which is explained in one of the later videos, which is why there's not much detail in it other than showing what a relative clause is.
@fatmiabid35786 жыл бұрын
In which video does that explained?
@vanlera7 жыл бұрын
at 2:58 , Shouldn't we add one more V' because of "great" is an adjunct?
@Trevtutor7 жыл бұрын
It is a complement of "is" in this case.
@vanlera7 жыл бұрын
Gotcha, thanks! And also I couldn't find "distinctive rules" in phonology videos. Is it in a different title? Or does it exist in your videos? Thanks again.
@Trevtutor7 жыл бұрын
not sure what a "distinctive rule" is, but there is a video on "phonological rules" in [Phonology] that uses features, if that's what you mean.
@vanlera7 жыл бұрын
Yep, I just checked out and that was exactly what I meant. Thanks a lot, I hope we see more Linguistics in your channel!
@MichaelWilliams26 жыл бұрын
Isn't it correct that it should be an adjunct? I have read to believe that a verb phrase may only take a prepositional phrase or a noun phrase as its compliment? www.unlweb.net/wiki/X-bar_theory
@sameerakhan68806 ай бұрын
Sir, why can't we classify , I, as NP instead of DP as it doesn't have a determined. Similarly, why can't we classify John as NP instead of DP
@Trevtutor6 ай бұрын
Some theories do, but modern transformational grammar treats proper names and pronouns as determiners. Giuseppe (1994) and Cardinaletti & Starke (1999) were major influences for this. It's a little complicated.
@murdhyalshamari61292 жыл бұрын
Doesn’t the tree for ‘John is great’ missing a T’?
@Ilariasarkis2667 Жыл бұрын
What about (if) tree diagrams
@Trevtutor Жыл бұрын
Replace “that” with “if” under C and it will look the same.
@light-ej7wu7 жыл бұрын
you are awesome
@nghuuhieu2 жыл бұрын
Excuse me! What is DP? I really need help.
@ciel_nadouch56485 жыл бұрын
3:32 instead of DP, can I write NP I feel like DP is a lot more complicated. Thanks in advance And also you made a mistake in the Adjunct part, AP is the daughter of V' and sister of V' not just V.
@4ll3sb4n4n34 жыл бұрын
Just NP triangle doesn't work there. You can write out DP triangle to DP - D' - D [proper] NP - N' - N John NP always needs a DP so you can't leave out DP.
@ciel_nadouch56484 жыл бұрын
@@4ll3sb4n4n3 yeah thank you so much
@mjsaedy66375 жыл бұрын
Awesome !
@fwwryh78623 жыл бұрын
The man who eats pudding.
@jiaolinai29036 жыл бұрын
Teacher, what does ‘ DP’ mean ?
@arwahussein46135 жыл бұрын
Determiner Phrase
@merryrose60527 жыл бұрын
in the last sentence you didn't include a null T' ? why? can you please explain
@Trevtutor7 жыл бұрын
I didn't include T for any of the trees in this video. I formally introduce them in the next video, so I removed them from this lesson to keep the focus on "C" and "CPs". I probably could have included them, but it would have made the trees much larger.
@merryrose60527 жыл бұрын
thank you ^^
@lepredator1897 жыл бұрын
I thought TPs were supposed to be I(NFL) phrases? Which of these is more accepted?
@Trevtutor7 жыл бұрын
TP is more common in the generative syntax crowd.
@agustinaquintero373 жыл бұрын
But what about...'There is nothing( that) I can do'. That as a contact relative clause. You used a clause with a verb tought, but you didn't explain that in relative clauses
@ahmedchafnaji83807 жыл бұрын
what does TP mean?
@Trevtutor7 жыл бұрын
tense phrase
@bryanperez-hermosa89156 жыл бұрын
How about when the sentence starts with 'that' as a complementizer? As in: That you like gory videos bothers me. What would a tree for that look like? Would it be possible for an entire CP constituent to move to a DP position?
@vladotz7 жыл бұрын
Also why TensedPhrase instead of InflectionalPhrase?
@Trevtutor7 жыл бұрын
TP and IP are pretty much the same. TP is standard.
@vladotz7 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot for the clarification!
@chayma55947 жыл бұрын
I have the same question
@bumble2able6 жыл бұрын
What class is “to be” ?????
@Trevtutor6 жыл бұрын
As in "I have to be there at 1:00PM"? It's just a main verb in that case.