Trump's Plan For Iran | S. Ritter

[@WinWin-oo4uk]

This guy help map out Iraq before it was invaded. Iran is the last of the 7 countries to be invaded. If Iran gives up Nks it will be invaded.

[@conjering]

If Iran gets invaded, it will nuke itsnot real

[@phalastinie5704]

If Nato's members were sincere "to deter" nuclear development then they would destroy their own first. it's an unfortunate reality that you're right

[@hanksobh4454]

Iran don't gave up nks

[@Faiez-rh1gm]

He did not as he said Iraq don't have weapons of mass destructions

[@fallenswan1670]

Iran not been invaded because Pentagon knows they have not chance against Iran, but instead USA will lose all their military bases in middle east. Especially now, when Saudies are ending hostilities with Iran, and USA losing all their allies in the region because of genocide in Palestine. Iran does not need nuclear weapons, that is why the Ayatollah forbid doing such. Iran is 18. biggest country in the world by landmass, and 17. biggest by population. USA lost war against Afghanistan, which once was part of Iran (their people speech almost identical language, they can understand each others) - much smaller country.

[@MrAmhara]

If Iran makes a nuclear deal with Trump then Iran is dumber than I thought.

[@Faiez-rh1gm]

Yes

[@Faiez-rh1gm]

They want sanctions to be lifted

[@brk2507]

Agree those mullahs already messed up letting syria fall.

[@zahidabukhari9973]

Ir'an is dumber than you thought! And you are?

[@mzaki4949]

Sounds like Iran NEEDS their own - NOW.

[@suleimanjannabo313]

Iran has been there before Roman, Mongolia, British empires, and it will be there after the USA is gone, Iran is here to stay forever and stronger.

[@DarkKing-z6b]

We have nothing against the Iranian people or Iran's great history, our problem is the radical Iranian regime, armed proxies and Iran's nuclear program are dangerous and destabilizing goals and tools, Iran can abandon these dangerous tools and live as a peaceful country, but the mullahs' regime refuses

[@navidf1428]

@@DarkKing-z6b that's just a load of C R A P and you know it . I personally might not like my government but I'll never agree with those BS terms . for those are the only reasons Iran is not having the same fate as Libia had .

[@GabrielFernandez-es5nc]

​@@DarkKing-z6bjust like what the USA did to Gaddafi and Libya? lol

[@rashnuofthegoldenscales4512]

@@DarkKing-z6b We have a problem with YOU.

[@rashnuofthegoldenscales4512]

@@StephenRoss-po1rp None. Also, none of them have hypersonic missiles like Iran does with which Iran can use to smash American airbases.

[@samazadi972]

All scoot saying is only one side of story , if you think Iran is gonna sit and watch is only a dream ! Iran hand is so loaded that will surprise the world !

[@224dot0dot0dot10]

Please 🙏 explain to me what happened to Iran in Syria. Didn't Iran want Bashar Assad to remain the President of Syria ?

[@224dot0dot0dot10]

Please 🙏 explain to me what happened to Iran in Syria. Didn't Iran want Bashar Assad to remain the President of Syria ?

[@Samaa-os7hx]

​@@224dot0dot0dot10 Bashar was called to Moscow at beginning of Daesh move and when he arrived he was held and prevented from leaving Russia, as Russia, Turkey and USrael had already agreed on Daesh takeover of Syria. The Russians then jammed communications equipment of the Syrian army which meant they could do nothing, only the special forces tried to fight but overwhelmed had to retreat into Iraq (now Iraq returned them they will likely be severely dealt with by Daesh in Syria). Russia did similar in the Armenia Azerbaijan conflict when they and mi6 and cia agreed to hand over nagorno karabakh to Azerbaijan and end the conflictm

[@mzaki4949]

Iran should realize the ONLY reason nobody messes with North Korea and then have the same deterrent.

[@artists_lodge]

Yeah! At the moment Scott is auditioning* …

[@sailbroker6244]

America #1🇺🇲 Free America from AIPAC

[@mgg7756]

why you morons keep saying that? Israel is not more powerful than the US, it's the other way around, obviously. Is this an attempt to paint the US as the victim or something? It's so weird, please stop it already

[@muslimresponse103]

murica bout to be turned to glass by rasia and kina

[@Marwan-_-7m]

@@mgg7756then why USA go into debt to fund wars that only benefit the entity ? Why they always lick the feets of the entity’s leaders ?

[@Sigma10-c1k]

How?

[@CARTMANBRAWH]

Simple Coup d'etat ​@@Sigma10-c1k

[@bjoon]

Trump can't even manage his own weight, and y'all think of him as this magnanimous Cheeto messiah, How many times has he declared bankruptcy????

[@inlovewithi]

DTS.

[@flyer7799]

🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@ngonzales3781]

Better than the other guys, to anyone with a brain.

[@bjoon]

@ngonzales3781 choosing between CANCER or EMPHYSEMA but NEVER choosing NOT SMOKING. THATS U

[@SeamusMcFitz-jz9if]

You didn't even go to university. No one cares what you think 😅😅😅 Liberal arts degrees dont count unfortunately. I'll take a tall Americano 2xcreme and 3xsugar thanks bud.

[@smostars]

I hate to break it to Scott Ritter, but first of all Iran has redundancy in their nuclear program, so knocking out one facility will not disable their nuclear program. If such an attack occurs, Iran will dash for the bomb, which is ready to assemble. Here Scott and I are in agreement. Also Iran has already developed the delivery system, therefore if the US attacks Iran with a nuclear bomb, Iran will retaliate in kind quickly, plus level all the US military bases in the region by deploying thousands of missiles.

[@HaG92]

Iran also has ICBMs now. So US soil would be on the menu.

[@ryanmilton2643]

I hate to break it to you. Iran would rather be in BRICS than a massive war with Israel and the US which it would lose 1000% Even if Iran has nuclear weapons, how many do they have? 1? 2? 10? As of September 2020, the US had 3,750 nuclear warheads, active and inactive. Let's assume 75% are active. How's that going to end for Iran? Why do you think that the Iranian leadership is SO STUPID that they would embrace their own total annihilation? The best path is a diplomatic agreement that leads to peace, cooperation and economic development. BRICS is the path

[@barzankhorshidsawar1979]

Die iranische Regierung ist leeres Fass

[@patriotir]

He is nothing but a clown trying to scare bunch of reformist politicians in Iran. If U.S. could attack Iran they wouldn't negotiate in the first place. If Iran gives up on its nuclear program its the end of Iran.

[@rjyfjk-s4o]

Trump get to humiliated soon🤡🤡

[@DarkKing-z6b]

We have nothing against the Iranian people or Iran's great history, our problem is the radical Iranian regime, armed proxies and Iran's nuclear program are dangerous and destabilizing goals and tools, Iran can abandon these dangerous tools and live as a peaceful country, but the mullahs' regime refuses

[@rjyfjk-s4o]

@@DarkKing-z6b USA is the real threat to world with 5000 nukes and advanced weapons what did Iran or any Muslim country did to America? (nothing is the answer)

[@rashnuofthegoldenscales4512]

@@DarkKing-z6b Iran will have nuclear weapons. Cope.

[@djcopie]

@@DarkKing-z6b Oh man, did you ever fall for the BS. Sorry to break it to you in this fashion... but "wake the F up"!

[@runtimeterror4027]

To be honest this spews lots of nonsense the only way out for IRAN to actually have nuclear weapons there is no other alternative

[@DarkKing-z6b]

We have nothing against the Iranian people or Iran's great history, our problem is the radical Iranian regime, armed proxies and Iran's nuclear program are dangerous and destabilizing goals and tools, Iran can abandon these dangerous tools and live as a peaceful country, but the mullahs' regime refuses

[@runtimeterror4027]

@ look at the irony there is no one more dangerous than the US and they are exporting terror everywhere. Look around you maybe you the US should give up it nuclear weapons first then we can talk. To top it all off the US has a history of having used it against innocent people

[@navidf1428]

@@DarkKing-z6b that's just a load of C R A P and you know it . I personally might not like my government but I'll never agree with those BS terms . for those are the only reasons Iran is not having the same fate as Libia had .

[@DarkKing-z6b]

I mean this is really what the Iranian regime wants and what Iranian officials have said, for you and others like you to believe it or not is really worthless, because these are facts on the ground

[@cyberdemon6517]

​@@navidf1428iran's influence on hezbollah post 2000 has brought nothing but death and destruction on lebanon

[@annkristoff4303]

I don't agree with Scott on this one. Lots of military people say the US CANNOT defeat Iran, because there would have to be a land invasion, and the US is not capable of doing it effectively in a country like Iran. They couldn't defeat Afghanistan for the same reason.

[@bunchofcells]

Being completely neutral i think countries like usa and russia have the capability to destroy half of the world population but when it comes to cold wars usa is a joke

[@DJO1O1]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@bunchofcells]

isi h beta

[@amiralavy4431]

Viva Iran 👍❤️🇮🇷💪

[@DarkKing-z6b]

We have nothing against the Iranian people or Iran's great history, our problem is the radical Iranian regime, armed proxies and Iran's nuclear program are dangerous and destabilizing goals and tools, Iran can abandon these dangerous tools and live as a peaceful country, but the mullahs' regime refuses

[@muslimresponse103]

how has israhell won decisively or otherwise on all fronts? humus is still resistin. hezb is still south of litani and the huthis cannot be defeted even after years of saudi and now months of us&uk bomings. iran is weeks away from makin a nukbom and now Suria is free too!

[@mrjacktraeger]

Haha the only reason Syria is "free" is because assad was allowing Hezbollah and it's resupply of weapons to flow through the country. Look at a friggin map bro, how is Iran suppose to get weapons to it's people now that Syria is off limits. Tell me how so many of you are blind to the fact that the only way al quaeda would be allowed to do what they have by taking over Syria is because they're working with NATO & Isreali intelligence. That as well as being armed, funded, and air support from Isreal and NATO. Like I don't get what is so hard to understand about this other than you're clearly oblivious despite it happening since 10 years ago in Libya

[@AtlanticWirelessZA]

Syria ain't free. It was free-er under Assad. Now it's controlled by the US and Turkey which is a Nato nation

[@OmEvul1415]

Because they nukes and own the US government.

[@DarkKing-z6b]

Hamas is now almost destroyed, there are no strong operations against Israel because most of Hamas' fighters have been annihilated and Gaza is simply occupied by the Israeli army and will remain so until a friendly rule to israel is determined in Gaza, Hezbollah lost its important leaders, specifically Nasrallah, who is considered the symbol of Hezbollah for decades, and with the fall of Assad in Syria, Hezbollah is besieged and they are now the weakest ever, finally, Syria, the fall of the Assad regime was a nightmare to the Iranians that actually happend, so we can honestly say that Israel is fulfilling its wishes unlike Iran

[@muslimresponse103]

israhell now has a new front in Suria against “geehadeez” which they are freeking out about! a new sunni axis is being born which is much more problematik for israhell. irans shia axiss is still there with the huthis and hezb will be supllied like the huthis are still being supllied. there is no siege on hezb. its leaders don’t matter because they will just replace them. humus is still fayering rokets and kllng iofs in gza. and israhell is about to make a deal with humus for a seasfayre.

[@TheUltimate-tg9ge]

This guy has to learn to listen. He constantly tries to outsmart Scott. Calm down you don’t have to prove to us how smart you are.

[@AtlanticWirelessZA]

He's an impetuous kid. Also, he wants to diss Iran at every turn and push his own viewpoint. NOT a good interviewer

[@prop_co]

I did speak more than I would have liked during this podcast. If you watch my first interview with Scott or others in the podcast playlist, you’ll notice that I just ask questions and let the guest do the talking. I know all of you are here for them not for me. I can make a video anytime I want in the studio so my preferred style is to let you hear them talk. However, This time I felt compelled to counter Scott after he became emotional and animated at the start of the podcast, raising his voice at me and saying things like “Palestine is done”, “I’m more Palestinian than the Palestinians”, and, in an interview earlier that week, “I spit on the Syrians celebrating the fall of Bashar.” These takes were irrational and disrespectful to many who love his work. I had to address this. I don’t think I’m smarter than Scott but I’m informed enough to counter him here and there. Still, I acknowledge that I took up too much time. I will do a better job next time of being more precise/concise with my questions and avoid taking up air time so you guys can enjoy the guest as much as you possibly can. If you watch the full podcast, you’ll hear Scott himself acknowledge he made mistakes and we’re buddy buddy again by the end of it.

[@Hello_.226]

@@AtlanticWirelessZA what is your criteria for a good interviewer? Please create your own platform to teach us.

[@Hello_.226]

@@prop_co I appreciate you, Ahmad, for accepting criticism with an open heart and taking the time to respond thoughtfully and respectfully.

[@prop_co]

And thank you for supporting us all this time

[@orchidhealth2097]

I see Scott Ritter being interviewed, I click.

[@seanrambarran2323]

Iran as a new member of BRICS has to avoid any aggressive moves. Only if attacked will they retaliate again.

[@ryanmilton2643]

precisely

[@Mrizing]

That's a joke

[@antichamcha6544]

Scott is very knowledgeable but extremely erratic in his analysis because that's not his expertise. He says Iran is at the cusp but will remain a threshold nuclear power, and take the final step only if they deem necessary (which is if attacked). Then he says if they develop a weapon they will be attacked. Well, the point of a threshold power is to take the final step only if attacked, and he says the attack will take place only if Iran takes the final step, so which one is coming first? The the oil argument also did not make sense at all. If oil is made super cheap to break Iran or Russia's economies, all they have to do is wink at the Yemenis who will blow up Saudi facilities and the next thing is oil prices will be through the roof. I may not be an expert myself, but Scott is an INSPECTOR as he mentioned, not an analyst. And I do like him and appreciate his frustration at being used as a pawn in the Iraq war.

[@babakmirhadi2592]

This is the only time I can not belive Scott

[@samazadi972]

Iran president soon will be out of the office , he already mentioned his resignation !

[@a.m.9357]

Lol. Spreading lies again? Hasbara anyone? 😅😅

[@misdnouaria2049]

I hope so...he is a disgrace

[@UzumakiNagato]

I prefer Dr Jalili anyway

[@log_17]

@misdnouaria2049 One of the best ever

[@alimodiri6165]

No, he is not. There is no reason

[@ArsalanMousavi]

This is when Scott finally fulfills the role he was assigned, but in a misleading way (Iran).

[@axelsohn1454]

Scott is brilliant and hugely experienced. His young interviewer should be a better listener. However, I would like to hear a discussion between Scott and Mohamed Marandi, who is knowledgeable about of the Iranian leadership in ways that may result in a different assessment.

[@axelsohn1454]

Also add to this the upcoming defense treaty between Iran and Russia which would be a counterweight to Trump's leverage against Iran.

[@trachea123]

Every time Scott is about to say something juicy the host derails him ughh just shut up and let us listen!

[@JohnDoe-ef3nv]

For real. Kid's annoying.

[@FadiDarwish-r9b]

I think Iran has nuclear weapons already

[@FootUlcerDefender]

Me too, they already have north korean, ans Russian scientist there for many years.

[@debasismohanty1952]

No😂😂

[@BossaliniFiveO]

Iran got nuclear warheads from Kazakhstan in 1992, they just didn't have the missile delivery technology for those warheads until the last few years.

[@AtlanticWirelessZA]

​@@BossaliniFiveODunno about Kazakh nukes, but on the breakup of the Soviet Union, several Ukrainian nukes made its way to Iran, that's around 2000. So yeah, they definitely have them

[@debasismohanty1952]

@@BossaliniFiveO who told you

[@goldmo2427]

I’m done with all these people … from Scott Douglas Mc Gregor etc… this guy Scott was talking about how usa can’t do this and that with Iran .. now Iran has no choice ? Like they have to accept Israel and usa and he was one who was pushing that dumb strategy axis did where Iran basically did nothing and still nothing .. I’m confused.. like you telling me now usa is prepared but a few months ago they weren’t ?

[@mizenkah]

Well, Iran's ally Syria under Assad has fallen, which has weakened the axis of resistance and primarily served as a buffer and distraction for Iran making it more vulnerable to be attacked. Essentially, the U.S. is operating according to the plan outlined by Wesley Clark back in 2000. It’s very much like a game of chess, but to truly understand it, you need to know how to play the game. So, while Scott Ritter isn’t talking nonsense, it’s evident that you lack the knowledge to fully grasp the dynamics of this chessboard.

[@ScarlettpimpernellC]

Sadly Ritter now perplexes rather tgan enlightens. He no longer rings true

[@aliarefi22]

@ScarlettpimpernellC I think the FBI spooked Scott Ritter when they went after him in his home yearly this year.

[@Hello_.226]

The jungle’s law: survival of the strongest. Very informative as usual.

[@goldensun7262]

Thanks!

[@prop_co]

Thank you

[@muratsinanengin9773]

9:26 did you just consider the possibility of Iran breaking away from a deal and NOT the US? Brother, don’t you think this is going overboard?

[@John_21601]

God have mercy on us.

[@bocarazaz]

AMAN

[@alimodiri6165]

What if Iran has undeclared facilities and builds bombs and decides to retaliate against US bases and possibly US homeland ?

[@paulheydarian1281]

No! The ayatollahs aren't suicidal. You on the otherhand are clearly coco loco. 🤪

[@aliquran7535]

“Isn’t that in a way accepting Israeli Heaney region. Scott pause for few seconds. Iran is not about to accepts that. Scott doesn’t know what the hell he talking about when he say, Iran have to accepts whatever the USA says.

[@ThinkPositiveDude]

1.) Iran started developing nukes the moment the first US boots landed in Afghanistan 20+ years ago 2.) Trump is a D rated reality TV show clown pretending to be Ronald Reagan 2.0

[@k.s.naturalist6852]

And Trump is the 1st convicted felon president in the US history!

[@4tress300zx]

Hard! Well said!

[@Faiez-rh1gm]

Hope for their sake it's true

[@LionZebra]

This guy reiterates pipe dreams of the Trump administration! He’s embellishing those pipe dreams as well

[@Markjogo]

Crap 💩

[@iamyoda66]

The supreme leader is 85 years old. His no nuclear weapons position is the end of Iran. He is old and should retire..

[@FootUlcerDefender]

Didnt like the commentator, kepted interupting, and smug. Next time ask questions, then be quite

[@JohnDoe-ef3nv]

thank you

[@Peculiar_Velocity]

Is the name of this channel intentionally ironic? lmao

[@BlueDream1540]

Why are many talking about Iran having a nuclear bomb!? Iran doesn't need a nuclear bomb. Iran already has millions of missiles which can destroy all US bases and aircraft carriers in no time. And they can also completely destroy all of Israel many times over without using any nuclear weapons. Many people fail to mention the fact that Israel is so small and hence vulnerable and easily destroyable. Had it not been for US support, Israel would have long perished by now. The same could be said about US military bases. They are the ones that are far from home with limited resources. Also one needs to take into account the fact that the US and Israel have never attacked powerful countries. They have always only attacked weak defenseless people. This alone shows how weak they themselves are. If you think they were able to bring down Germany, think again. They didn't do it alone. Many countries worked together to make it happen; they couldn't do it alone. And interestingly the US hasn't won a single war since WWII! Iran has already proved itself capable of delivering massive destruction in a matter of seconds. The US and its allies with all their razzmatazz of weapons technology haven't even been able to put down Houthis let alone Iran. Last but not least, it's surprising to see how Scott assumes Iran a sitting duck that can't launch a counter attack! It would be naive and stupid to think that Iran can be easily attacked.

[@francisonyekwereuzo1232]

Bruhh please stop. Thats fucking cap dude wtf.

[@therealshah]

8:52 this guy is worried about Iran smh… he needs to focus on the real enemy

[@SzTz100]

He doesn't seem to be very smart or an amateur.

[@conjering]

Their enemies are not my enemies.

[@debasismohanty1952]

He is an American citizen 😂😂 and he don't care about iran

[@zozodolewin2479]

Are you. Forem. Israel 😂

[@ralphmumbeck5758]

*The USA/collective Western plot is always the same.* The people of the Greater Middle East, including the Levant (most of whom are Semites, and the followers of Abrahamic religions) have been divided and ruled over by outsiders for centuries. *Because it is easier to divide people based on personal differences, than it is to unite them, based on what they have in common.* Strategically ambiguous outsiders make use of this, for own advantages. In the era of empires, first Rome/Constantinople, then during WW1 the seat of POWER playing these games changed to London/Paris (Sykes-Picot/Balfour Declaration/WW1), then after the 1950's as European colonialism's power decreased, starting around the time a bark by Washington DC in 1956 (Suez Crisis/War) showed who the new boss was, the role of divider was simply taken over by Washington DC (the entire ME was the playground during the Cold War). Now the intention is simply to avoid unity in the ME, in order to _rule over the dissent_ which is classical divide-and-rule. Today, their leaders are ALL tools. Draw lines on the map without asking any of those affected. Exploit and foster endless wars, meddle for constant dissent. *Divide-and-rule connects the dots on the timeline of history.* Who has had (in all historical cases in the ME/Levant) the GEOGRAPHICAL ADVANTAGE of distance from the events resulting out of the own meddling and political activities, being able to reach all the other regions, but could not be reached itself as hegemony, at any given point of a historical timeline? Pax Romana, Rome. Pax Britannica, London. Pax Americana, Washington DC. All they ever wanted was *pax,* because they said so, but who picks up the *pieces of great wealth and the systemic gains* when all the others can be avoided from uniting? *Different Empires. Different era. Same games...* ------------------------------------- The people of the Africa have been divided and ruled over by outsiders for centuries. Tribalism makes it easy to divide people, then keep them poor under the "kind foot" of exploitation. In the era of empires, first Rome/Constantinople in North Africa, then during the era of Western imperialism the seat of POWER playing these games changed to the USA/Europe, then after the 1950's as European colonialism's power decreased, Africa was the playground during the Cold War. Once the dividers had reached peak power for themselves, by simply drawing lines on the map without asking any of those affected (Congo Conference/1884) the own systems of gain could siphon off wealth like a giant vacuum cleaner. The intention was simply to avoid unity in Africa, in order to _rule over the dissent_ which is classical divide-and-rule. During the Cold War, Moscow took on the role of arming the resistance to the colonial dividers. Today, all African dissenters fighting against unity, including some of Africa's own greedy corrupt leaders, are ALL tools. Endless wars, constant dissent. _Give the weak mind money, and they will dance for the outside dividers..._ *Divide-and-rule.* Oldest trick in the book... Different people and systems. Different places on the map. Same games. -------------------------------------- The people of the Americas, including the USA, have been divided and ruled over by outsiders for centuries. In the beginning stages of era of European Imperialism, first Spain and Portugal entered the Americas, employing the divide-and-rule technique of top-down power on the local systems (Aztecs/Incas), and as European colonial powers' influence decreased during the 19th century, the role of divider was simply taken over by Washington DC. As the own power increased incrementally, the entire world became the playground after around 1900. Today, it is the globalists who employ imperialist tools to play divide-and-rule games on their neighbours. *Forget nukes. The divide-and-control/rule/conquer strategy is the most powerful force on the planet, because it can be employed equally in times of peace to CONTROL, in times of crises to RULE, and in times of war to CONQUER.* Ever since the two-faced snake slithered down that tree of unity (fable), speaking out of both sides of the mouth (lies, deceit), the wisest human beings have fruitlessly warned, and the easily divisable have continuously been warned against divisions within a peaceful status quo. When you bow to the division caused by deception, you will lose the good life..."and much that once was, is lost; for none now live who remember it." Such divisions create GAIN for OUTSIDERS (Eden as a system divided by lies and deceit). Now the intention is simply to avoid unity in the Americas, in order to rule over the dissent which is classical divide-and-rule. Endless wars on anything and everything from "drugs" to "terror" (sic.), constant dissent with everything's a war war war... Insert levers of lies, mistrust. The *two-party-duopoly* is two cheeks of the same golden hind which set out to create favourites: Favouritism, by granting access to the own POWER/WEALTH, to those who volunteer to act as proxies and extensions for the own power projection. The small picture lives of domestic political chaos, of the big picture reality of international insanity. Point the systemic (MSM) finger, everywhere else, by use of the own paid stooges of power by presenting their deep state-orchestrated three-letter-agency astroturfed violence on multiple tiers as being the reactions of "the poor oppressed people, who need our help for freedom and democracy" (sic.). Liars, deceivers, creators of the BLACK LEGEND for the "other side". *In February 1948, George F. Kennan's Policy Planning Staff said: "[W]e have about 50% of the world's wealth but only 6.3% of its population. ... Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity."* Kennan: A prototype GLOBALIST. And that is what they did to increase their own wealth. Set up people against each other, then siphon off the wealth of entire regions of the planet. *And that is what you are fighting for. That is what the hegemon has always done, pretending to be the "good pax", but playing "good cop/bad cop" with the world, from a position of power.* In the past, the "good cops" were the INTERNATIONALISTS, and the "bad cops" were the IMPERIALISTS. In the present that has morphed into the "good cops" being the GLOBALISTS/NEOLIBS, and the "bad cops" being the NEOCONS. Name-branding and doublespeak for the slumberland plebs, enchanted by their "bread-and-circuses"-existences. America's friends and self-proclaimed default rivals in Eurasia are still being burnt to ensure this disparity continues, with a (quote) "pattern of relationships" which are beneficial to the own rule. Set up European and Eurasian nations (including the Middle East/North Africa) against each other. It is how divide-and-rule is implemented. The imperialist playbook of Great Britain and the USA for more than 100 years. Read Halford Mackinder (Pivot of History, 1904) and Zbigniew Brzezinski (Grand Chessboard, 1997) regarding Eurasia for the template. Read W.T. Stead (Americanization of the World, 1901) for the guideline of political-, cultural- and economic capture. Read Smedley-Butler (War is a Racket) for the modus operandi of imperialism/militarism. Some say Europe is a divine goddess. I say, it is a humble apple tree, from an allegory as old as modern civilizations, because it is easy to divide. *Divide and Rule.* Oldest trick in the book... Four corners of the globe. Different cultures and religions. Same games. THE LINK OF THE WORLD. The entire system they favor in the USA/collective West is based on a pre-set *managed and moderated division,* for the benefit of a very few at the top of the pyramids accompanied by the often-repeated nice-sounding storyline. Create the script of the own heroes. Their entire scripted money-funded history sounds like a Hollywood superhero movie that sounds too good to be true. Guess what? It is. It is what they are NOT telling you, that they try to hide. Who wields the POWER? Who has had the GEOGRAPHICAL ADVANTAGE of being able to reach all the other little buck catchers (tools, and other Roman-era style instruments of POWER), but could not be reached itself, because of a geographical-, technological-, organizational-, military-, strategic-, political advantage at any given point of a historical timeline? Create the default rival/enemy on their own marching routes. It is usually the power most likely to succeed which is determined as the default rival/enemy. Notice how, as soon as a rival starts mass-producing products high up in the value chain of capitalism, and starts vying for markets, and becomes successful, it immediately becomes the systemic rival, and is then geopolitically encircled by the greater empire. It happened around 1900, as Germany started building high-value products, and it happened around 2000, as China started moving away from building cheap toys and labor intensive kitchen appliances... The games start on the home turf. The first victims are their own people in the USA/collective West, locked in the eternal struggle for wealth and personal gain which they have been deceived into thinking is "good greed", but which WILL be exploited by the snakes who deceive them on the domestic tier of the divide-and-rule system of power. Because ..."most of the great problems we face are caused by politicians creating solutions to problems they created in the first place." - Walter E. Williams *War is a great **_divider._** It goes straight through the heads of millions and billions of people from the very top tiers, right down to the individual level. War divides alignments and alliances, goes straight through organizations, divides political parties, tears through families, and finally at the very bottom tier, goes straight through individual hearts and minds as individuals struggle with themselves.*

[@EdwardAppleby-xk1yq]

Please keep these coming. You two are dynamite together.

[@sebastianaminoff9703]

Very interesting take!

[@Pace18692]

Scott This host must be in love with beebee

[@goldmo2427]

He’s not but he’s a moron who supported Mickey Mouse Syrian revolution ..

[@RaySarv]

Iranians wining hand is the nuclear weapons they already possess. Iranians are 40 years ahead of the western alliance they have all the right moves set on the chess board. Don’t ever forget that Iran is the creator of the chess board game.

[@Lavvonaffair]

Worst part is Scott R has been wrong about many things he’s said about Israel / Gaza etc . Why are people still bothering with him ?

[@Raydaruckuz]

Yup. And The worst thing he was wrong about was Gonzalo Lira. May have costed him his life. Scott turned all his cultist fans away from Lira when he needed all the support he could get. I still respect Scott, but sometimes I wonder if he's still part of intelligence in a IIA capacity of some sort

[@debasismohanty1952]

​@@Raydaruckuz😂😂😂 never take social media experts statements seriously

[@Lucmercurius]

​​@@RaydaruckuzHe is an agent. It is pretty obvious for perceptive people. Same as Larry Johnson. Just be careful, its all about misinformation, damage control and directing the narratives. The empire is extremely resourceful. Also, be careful with the likes of Pepe Escobar, he's a mouthpiece for the Kremlin.

[@Lavvonaffair]

@Raydaruckuz I agree as well . Is he just there to spread a certain narrative to deceive . He kept saying - Israel is finished ( ideologically ) etc etc , when in fact Israel had not stopped a day with its killing. He is so wrong , I’m now wondering if it’s on purpose

[@StoneTR1357]

So what was he wrong about exactly?

[@musicsubicandcebu1774]

"RODE Backhoe Microphones - A Tough Mic, for when the Talk gets Tough."

[@beedarsho]

99 percent of his predictions about Middle East and Russia and Ukraine war was wrong and about Us will attack Iran with nuke will be wrong too .but he is great talker he could be a good entertainer

[@inlovewithi]

Which predictions were wrong?

[@beedarsho]

@@inlovewithi if you would have followed him from beginning of wars in Middle East and Ukraine you would know go to you tube you may find his older videos also now he is changing I believe CIA and Mossad warnned him like the time went to search his house and now what he says about Iran and Iran power different then before I think he back up and scared when Tramp take over the power people like him will get punished or be dead so he changed he is scared .

[@zabiarayyan7056]

@@inlovewithi He actully said so much about humush and hezb but it went all wrong. so honestly his predictions are not very well predicted.

[@skanthaadsigns]

All Glories to BRICS+

[@cmsacademy1673]

Few months ago he was saying that Iran would win and now he is accepting that Iran got destroyed. Sad reality

[@MrAmhara]

Scott talks a lot of shit. lol

[@Godson3GsMusicManagament]

He has lost his mind

[@parhamaleahmad2533]

He said it then based on the facts on the ground then and he is saying this again based on the fact on the ground nowadays The situation turned for the worst so analysis changed I believe nobody has all the facts so we have to wait and see

[@ChrisStFleur]

Because he's trump supporter

[@The_Servant_of_The_Almighty]

If weapons are good for one country they are good for every country.. Stop believing anyone is supreme.. Stay out of everyone's country and worry about ur own. Sounds like a peace solution.

[@WinWin-oo4uk]

I commented twice KZbin deleted both my comments.

[@MrAdam6468]

Me too today also

[@MrAmhara]

@@MrAdam6468Happened to me yesterday. Israeli- Tube is a sensitive bunch. lol

[@blacksheepnonconformist.8900]

You obviously told the Truth.

[@parhamaleahmad2533]

Sometimes after putting comments go hit tab newest and go back you will see your comment if not you are right I checked my comments several times until a friend told me Went back and checked the comments were there

[@WinWin-oo4uk]

@@parhamaleahmad2533 I reload the video. Then click on Comments to see if KZbin deleted it.

[@RexRecon]

Woah, this is a fresh angle

[@mohamedkassim8670]

Amazing video

[@SohilaTolouie]

China,Russia and Iran are in same team. You forgot that part.

[@I.m-d8h]

Iran Have Right Of Nuclear Deterrence Against Israeli Threats

[@patriotir]

Scott is bluffing he knows what happens to the Americans in the region.

[@zeez4178]

He has nothing to do about Iran

[@RajSingh-xv9xk]

We are assuming that Iran does not have a plan.

[@blacksheepnonconformist.8900]

Ritter still making American Threats, he's part of the Machine. Trump to control China, OK Got It 😂😂😂

[@ryanmilton2643]

you misunderstand or are projecting. I can't tell. He's providing an analysis of where things are. In fact, if you care to read/listen to Ritter, he prefers that the US live in cooperation with BRICS Nations and China. He has a view of what Trump will do, not what he would/should do, but what Trump's strategy is. This is their goal. This is not Scott Ritter's goal.

[@blacksheepnonconformist.8900]

@ryanmilton2643 I have probably listened to Ritter much more than you,he was once a reliable source of good information and balanced perspectives, but since being investigated,by certain American security agencies,he has been compromised and he has changed his attitude to the AMERICAN MIGHT IS RIGHT, philosophy the message has become more aggressive,than the one he was preaching a few years ago, the reign of American exceptionalism is over, but like all empires they over reach,and never go quietly, the rest of the world has had enough, and will eventually turn it's back on American threats and Hypocrisy.

[@Mrizing]

Scott Ritter will be arrested in Early Q1 of 2025

[@Samaa-os7hx]

Iran needs its pizzas. Yemen too.

[@roozpoppin50]

He said iran got all the ingredients for making nukes 😂. Let me tell you as an iranian living in iran they don't have shit my friend. Its all a bluff

[@hasanalmeer6242]

This is what you wish 😂

[@raminmansouri24]

If trump say any word about what Iran do and what not to do it mean end of U.S.T

[@semanavidi8694]

Please let Scott talk and stop interrupting.

[@muneebbhat3928]

You have to remember ritter is produce of the empire also

[@chgojack1]

Please Ritter works 4 Israel

[@MrAmhara]

He doesn’t work for Israel but he does get “ shook” sometimes. lol

[@wajahatgilani]

LOL, What?!! The man openly backs Hamas, not Palestine, HAMAS!

[@jiddasaid4456]

Scotts information is helping us understand why Iran is behaving in certain inexplicable ways. But, he makes a perennial mistake of proclamation of finality of outcome in a very dynamic situation.

[@AnthonyRobinson-t7y]

Hey Scott, you a Vet? Who's side you on, Bro?

[@Jen-c6u]

Our Scott, he doesn't take a day off for Christmas. I love you Scotty, Merry Christmas!

[@KrazyK444]

Can people stop thinking they understand these things better than Ritter. You don't. The man is spot on in all he says.

[@Mrizing]

Nope he's paid Rus actor

[@RussellAlami]

Too much waffle . Get to the point , in as few words as possible

[@DarkKing-z6b]

We have nothing against the Iranian people or Iran's great history, our problem is the radical Iranian regime, armed proxies and Iran's nuclear program are dangerous and destabilizing goals and tools, Iran can abandon these dangerous tools and live as a peaceful country, but the mullahs' regime refuses

[@zabiarayyan7056]

dude you will do abslutly nothing. stop pretending to be smart. lran is not stuck in the 80s. They can spank you any day of the week with ease.

[@tanl7756]

episode 9 got cut off. DAMN. It left off on wesley clark

[@paymansarrafi7536]

Lets see whether Mr. Trump will actually be inaugurated on 20th of January😜😜😜

[@rezamehr9379]

I already said that Scott is desperate in his mind. He just adjusts himself to the daily events. He is unable to see the long-term strategy of Iran and West Asia and more. There are many parameters at play here, but Scott only sees Trump's strategy as considering Palestine as dead 🤣 Trump's Iran strategy according to Scott: either no nuclear weapons or Iran is dead..🤣 Scott is really desperat...

[@stevenamoah9849]

Thos gut likes isreal too much makimg me think

[@quickquestion4271]

Who is this guy? I have trust issues

[@muslimresponse103]

lol

[@SzTz100]

Ritter or the Iraqi guy ?

[@quickquestion4271]

@@SzTz100 Ritter….. is he like an Alex jones or something

[@SzTz100]

@@quickquestion4271 He was working for the United Nations Special Commission from 1991 to 1998, which was charged with finding and destroying all weapons of mass destruction and WMD-related manufacturing capabilities in Saddam's Iraq. He opposed George W Bush's war since he knew there were no WMDs and has been a dissident of sorts since then. He's an ex-Marine of the US army.

[@AttiaMokbel]

@@quickquestion4271 he is an ex CIA member and a critic of US foreign policy

[@abbas9400]

And then Russian think, has the right to do so. And then China and then India and so on. 😂😂😂

[@turkraja3839]

@12:04 😂😂 slapped him out

[@donjohnson6111]

The INTERVIEWER Talks and Interrupts Too Much & Tries Finishing His GUEST's Sentences!

[@hashimthedream3581]

Quiet youngster, Dr. Ritter is the expert.

[@goldmo2427]

Lol he Doesn’t know what he’s talking about .. he said usa couldn’t do anything with Iran a month ago and now he saying this .. dude is cooked .and I don’t like propaganda co because he’s another bozo

[@iceman9561]

I lost respect for Scott’s analysis, every thing he said so far has been wrong

[@sassanbahramirad1273]

I don't like that Scott keep changing his words. Just watch his first video about 1 year ago and compare to this.

[@ahassand922]

First

[@4tress300zx]

Chumps concept of a plan depending on what his boss Yahoo has planned.

[@JinxFromArcaneShow]

First of all you're there to ask questions only, this interview was almost 80% you talking instead of him,i also think Scott only did one mistake and got emotional and raised his voice which is rude, apart from that i agree with him totally on everything

[@Angelsarereal3]

Ritter is always wrong.

[@amiralavy4431]

Scott is right. You probably have very low IQ to understand

[@conjering]

The host looks like I can make him cry.

[@garfield1186]

Scott Ritter sounds like an AI

[@henrysymonds6531]

That sounds very one sided to me are you going disarm Israel nuclear weapons to be fare why should Israel have nuclear weapons wave them at very country in the middle east

[@bjabbbjabb1286]

Bunker busters ? Really? NORAD busters ?

[@alsh8597]

Im starting to think Ritter is a double agent.

[@ryanmilton2643]

then yo don't know Ritter

[@alsh8597]

@ u a small hat ?

[@johntex105]

I was not aware that Scott Ritter was giving interviews, I thought he was serving time for his child molestation conviction. Guess Biden must have given him a pardon.

[@UnlockedANDunleashed]

شلوك ريتارد

[@courierton9217]

USA built the nuke plant in Iran in the 60s.

[@johnmore4861]

This man is so stupid