Рет қаралды 7,159
First, three things. First - I don't receive any money, neither from the production company, KZbin, Amazon or anyone else. Second - this was a first private attempt at my own risk. Anyone who tries this on their coins does so at their own risk. Third - this is the first little video I've done - so please bear with me - I'm not doing this professionally.
I have tried the wax on an ancient bronze coin of Gordianus. I have deliberately used a somewhat porous coin. On the web you often see smooth bronze coins. What happens then is logical - the wax settles on the surface of the smooth coin and it shines like new. But this is not because of the coin itself - but only because the wax stays on the surface.
Hence the experiment with a porous coin. In my opinion, there is hardly any difference. Especially not on the obverse - as this is/was very stained anyway. On the reverse side, I see a small improvement - the pores have been closed somewhat and the coin looks a little softer.
My first impression - the wax does not turn a "VF" coin into an "EF" coin. It is logical that everything suddenly shines on smooth surfaces. I did not notice any real improvement on a large scale.
But it has to be said - this is not written on the tin - nor is it promised by the manufacturer. Here you can only read that the wax protects. And I think that's what the wax is there for. It can close pores to a certain degree, seal them and also protect the coin itself. The latter should also be the main task of the wax.
CONCLUSION: My opinion. Often praised on the web as a miracle cure for antique coins - for me, at first glance, there is no benefit to justify the expense of the wax. I do not know how the wax and the coins react - even in the long term - and should therefore be treated with caution. From my point of view - an unnecessary expense for such a tin of wax.