Worth it! I've had many cameras, most Nikon's. their glass is as good as anyone, EXCEPT Leica. The lenses are magical. Shapest I have ever seen. Now maybe Hasselblad has better, but then their costs are astronomical compared even to Leica. Plus controls, ergonomics (with right grip), Auto/Manual focus modes, sealed lens (no more sensor dust, at least not that need my cleaning), 61MP (crop able to 20mp easily) and great features. Worth it.
@KaanSenel2 ай бұрын
I probably didn't have enough time to play with it. I bet I'd start loving it over a longer period of time as well!
@kishanpatel23318 ай бұрын
Q3 looks amazing!!
@KaanSenel8 ай бұрын
Not that much different imo, but the tones do look good for sure
@smooth1110129 ай бұрын
Wow that warmth from the Q3 is better, more cinematic
@KaanSenel9 ай бұрын
It is indeed a bit warmer and looks a bit nicer, but I find the difference quite marginal. Only that wouldn't be worth the price difference imo
@duvalpenny1008 ай бұрын
There is a slider in all photo editing apps that will make any photo warmer.
@JowalQPhotos8 ай бұрын
Immediately could tell which was the Sony just by the colors, that brown is a dead giveaway. I’ve had a Sony cam for 8 years and the colors always leave a lot to be desired, even after editing. Just got my Leica a week ago so really excited to take it for a spin
@KaanSenel8 ай бұрын
Well, that's your opinion for sure. Sony's come a long way and I did think the Leica colours looked a tiny bit better, but the difference isn't that dramatic imo. Super exciting you got a Leica tho, might get one myself if I have the funds haha, enjoy!
@TheEnergizedcinema8 ай бұрын
sorry to say, but not being able to get good colors has more to do with your editing then with your camera. It's just an excuse to blame it on the gear and wanting to buy more gear to get better.
@JowalQPhotos8 ай бұрын
@@KaanSenel definitely, their colors have gotten far better but it was a bit of change after shooting with canon for so long. So far the Leica color profiles are stellar outta the box.
@JowalQPhotos8 ай бұрын
@@TheEnergizedcinema lol who says I can’t get good colors, I still shoot Sony professionally and for paid gigs, that’s not changing. No where in my comment am I saying “Leica make me GUD” lol just noting that Sony in the past didn’t quite have a color profile as solid as say canon, but they’ve gotten better.
@TheEnergizedcinema8 ай бұрын
@@JowalQPhotos you literally said, "colors leave a lot to desire even after editing"
@frits14638 ай бұрын
Things like micro contrast, deeper blacks, sharpness etc make the images out of any Leica special. The Sony produced a bit flatter images.
@KaanSenel8 ай бұрын
I did notice those small things as well. But for lot's of people that won't be worth the price difference.
@frits14638 ай бұрын
@@KaanSenel I don't see them as small things but exactly the things that make the difference.
@ALWH13148 ай бұрын
I have Leica Q2 and Sony A7C ii, have to be honest Leica color science is hard to beat. Sony comes a long way, with help from fantastic GM lenses, it’s much better than say five years ago. However,Sony photo needs editing to match Leica. I love both for different scenarios.
@KaanSenel8 ай бұрын
I really liked the warmer tones and the micro contrast of the Leica as well for sure! I probably also would get a Leica some day if I had the money haha. Both tools serve a different clear purpose indeed.
@TheEnergizedcinema8 ай бұрын
cool comparison, i actually have a picture profile that converts your sony colors to leica. It's like 95% identical
@KaanSenel8 ай бұрын
Thanks, ooh sounds good!
@ruialex3146 ай бұрын
Any way you could share it?
@ChaseMoreLight8 ай бұрын
No way. An APC Fuji over a full frame Leica Q3? Wild take.
@KaanSenel8 ай бұрын
The price to size & quality ratio play a big part here. The Leica Q3 is not for a lot of people due to the cost. I might want to get one myself one day, so I'm absolutely not bashing on Leica or the Q3. It's a beautiful machine with beautiful images. Like I said, I also didn't have that much time with it so I didn't fully experience everything about the cam.
@KaanSenel8 ай бұрын
Obviously it's way better than the Fuji in every way except for size and price
@MARKLINMAN1Ай бұрын
They are deft worth it if you have the money.
@KaanSenelАй бұрын
I didn't have enough time to play around with so I probably didn't understand the camera and how it feels shooting with it. I'd probably still love to have one in the future
@kevincooper86668 ай бұрын
The Leica Q3 has 60 mp at 28mm when you crop it or shoot it like a 75mm it will no longer have 60mp probably closer to the 16mp of my Fuji xpro 1 with the 50f2 fitted my lens will display better background seperation at this focal length my 50f2 is pretty sharp the xpro1 has some pretty nice colours and can get quite close you say 6000 for the Leica Q3 I say 650 2nd hand for my xpro1 & 50 f2 plus I can put any other lens on I choose to autofocus or manual F1,f1.2,f1.4 why would I buy a Leica Q,Q2,Q3 I wouldn't I would be limiting my possibilities photo wise and financially
@KaanSenel8 ай бұрын
It's a very specific niche camera for sure. It's not meant to be for everyone and not everyone will like it, that's a fact!
@christopherdavis91378 ай бұрын
Thanks for the video! Hopefully telsa fan boys don’t see this 😂
@KaanSenel8 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching and hahaha, I won't mind them knowing