TT Artisan 27/2.8 AF for Fuji X - review & many samples!

[@neilmontgomery3470]

I bought this lens a few week ago and I am delighted with my purchase. It does flare when shot directly into strong light but a moment to recompose can eliminate or minimise this. The vignette is only really noticeable fully open and can be used artistically. If you don't want the vignette, it is easy to remove in software. I use Affinity and it's a one click fix. All in all one of my better budget photo buys. Thank you for your review I am glad you made me aware of this lens.

[@tomscameras]

Many thanks Neil for your feedback. I am happy that you like your lens and get great results with it!

[@jasonyoung1999]

I already own the newer Fuji version but I'm glad TT is starting to make AF lenses for Fuji. I really enjoy using their manual focus lenses. Thanks for the review.

[@tomscameras]

If you can get the Fuji X-E4 bundle that includes this lens, there’s no point to look for the much cheaper TT Artisan. Otherwise the price difference is huge. I hope TT Artisan will keep on going like this!

[@CollectedWorx]

I loaned mine to my brother long term, may use that as an excuse to double down on my favorite focal length 😅

[@thebitterfig9903]

QC issues aside (I didn’t have any, but still), a pleasant surprise of a lens. Hits the sweet spot for me of small size, good sharpness, and interesting character. Going wide open and hunting for things I can shoot close with backgrounds that will swirl is a lot of fun with this. Or stop down a bit for a sharp normal shot. I hope TTArtisan leans into a similar style with other AF lenses. The flawed optics but character of a vintage lens, with all the modern conveniences. An AF 40mm as swirly as a Helios 44 would be fantastic, and unlike anything else on the market. It’d be an interesting niche for a company.

[@tomscameras]

Yes, I think this is a great everyday lens. Specs are maybe not exciting (as with the Fujinon 27/2.8), but size, weight, sharpness, cost and versatility are its strong points!

[@danj2235]

I just received it and confirm it works fine with XE1 camera, so far no issues 🙂 UPDATE: At first i thought the lens was "soft" but then found out the problem was the AF is not accurate. Manual focusing i get crisp images, so the optics are fine but AFS is not reliable, i get mostly out of focus pictures. Closing to 5.6 or 8 is less noticeable, but wide open is very obvious. I've tried it with XE1 and XE3 with same results, also lens has the latest firmware. I really wanted this lens to become my everyday lens, but the AF performance in my unit is not reliable 🙁... for MF i would rather keep the TTartisan 23mm 1.4...

[@tomscameras]

That's great to hear, many thanks for your feedback, valuable information! Have fun with your lens!

[@danj2235]

I suggest to keep firmware updated 🙂 Taken from the TTartisan download center: AF 27 F2.8 XF V1.0.1 Firmware update instructions：2022-11-01 1. Optimize the focus and compatibility of some old cameras, such as X-A1、X-A3、X-Pro1、X-E1

[@dermin3060]

​@@danj2235 Hi, do you still have this lens? What is your opinion after few months?

[@throtol]

Tom, I purchased a Voigtlander Perkeo and hope to receive it tomorrow. I had noticed that you had done a review for the TT Artisan 27/2.8 AF for Fuji X. I have had it on my Fujifilm XE-3 almost non-stop for an entire year. It is my "go to" lens. You have done an excellent job in presenting it. My only shortcoming with it is the autofocus works most, but not all of the time, or is slow when compared to my Fujifilm 23/2 lens. This shortcoming is easy to overcome, and I would recommend it to every Fuji X user as a primary tool with just the right amount of length.

[@tomscameras]

Many thanks for your comment and feedback! I hope you will have a lot of fun with your Perkeo. Apart from the winding mechanism they are fairly simple and straightforward. And yes, the Fujinon 23/2 is a fantastic lens and it offers fast auto focus. If you would compare the TT Artisan to the old Fuji 35/1.4 or 27/2.8, the difference wouldn’t be there 😀 (but I still do love the 35/1.4 a lot!)

[@chuecco]

Am I the only one surprised at how Thomas can predict the amount of distortion correction a picture will need by just looking at it?

[@tomscameras]

😅 actually it was like that: Just a guess from my side! And I was fully prepared to put in an asterix and the correct amount there when editing the video 😀

[@dummatube]

Hi Tom, Thanks for your extensive review! I bought this one for the small bit of extra wide angle coverage (40.5mm equivalent versus a 43mm 'normal perspective lens' on 35mm full frame). With it's rumoured bias towards edge sharpness I wasn't disappointed! I really need edge sharpness for my work and can easily fix the distortion and vignetting in the Raw files using a custom LightRoom preset whilst maintaining 95% of the original sharpness, With some final small 'global' clarity and sharpening tweaks I fixed the overall look to the extent that I can even use the lens for my critical studio art reprography work on the new Fuji 40MP sensor! As a final bonus I can turn all my 'manual fixes' off and just enjoy the wonderfull 'swirly bokeh' (rare on any cropped sensor) and other lovely 'flaws' that add so much character to my X-E4 images! BRILLIANT!

[@tomscameras]

Many thanks for your detailed feedback! I didn’t shoot this lens yet on a 40 MP body so your information is greatly appreciated!

[@richardhale9664]

Mine arrived a couple of weeks ago. Forget bench testing, in real world use, optically there are very few differences between this lens and my old XF 27mm (pre WR and aperture ring). The differences I notice are:- 1. More vignetting. With the hood attached and shooting RAW. Vignetting is very obvious even at say f5.6. Solution - either remove the hood and the problems go away or shoot JPEG. The hood is not much use anyway as the front element is quite well recessed to start with, and the lens cap has a tendency to fall off the hood. 2. Maybe a bit more prone to flair, but my copy is not that bad to start with. 3. Er.... That's about it. Physically, the TTartisan is a little bit bigger. This is welcome when mounted on my X-T1. The aperture ring is not as nice as Fuji one's are, but it is there and takes very little getting used to. The AF seems pretty decent and a bit quieter than Fuji's. If you are not buying the killer deal of the X-E4 together with the XF 27mm WR, this lens is a no brainer. Massively cheaper than Fuji's offering, with competitive performance. One oddity though. When mine arrived I mounted it on my X-E3 and it would not focus. Tried it on my X-T20 and it worked fine straight away. Worked fine on my X-T1 too. Put it back on the X-E3 and now it works just fine.

[@tomscameras]

Hey Richard, many thanks for your detailed feedback, much appreciated! I think most of what you say is exactly in line with my own findings. I didn't have a noticeable difference though in vignetting between lens hood / no lens hood. I find the vignetting can be distracting at times, even though I'm normally very tolerant to this. It's an easy fix in post if needed, still a little bit less vignetting would be welcome IMO. The autofocus oddity that you experienced is really weird! My copy works well on my X-E4 but I saw a few reports from others who had electronic issues which is why I mentioned it in my video. Let's hope TT Artisan will issue firmware updates when needed.

[@flowermaze___]

But also flair* it’s a stylish lens

[@hiramabiff885]

As always a superb review. I love all my TTArtisan lenses and this one is being added for my X-Pro1 and X-E3. It will be great to have and autofocus lens in this focal length for sneaky people shots.

[@tomscameras]

Yes, sometimes AF is just very handy! I'm also looking forward to additional lenses like that in the future!

[@marieacosta3739]

A good lens is one that I like using😊 I have found this to be fun and freeing, making me rely more on my eyes rather than the lens. Using this lens on an old A6000! Great video BTW!

[@tomscameras]

Thanks for your feedback! Also it's good to hear that the TT Artisan works well on the A6000 ... yes it is a bit older but still a great camera by the way!

[@judeemclaughlin7394]

I got this lens when I ordered my XE4. It got delayed and took an additional 10 days to get. I am currently comparing it to the sigma 56mm 1.4 that I got so I could use the camera . I thought the awkwardness of the aperture ring was me (first time using a fuji). Glad to know it isn't. None of the reviews I saw before ordering mentioned this. All in all, I am happy with the purchase.

[@tomscameras]

The Sigma is of course a much more "exciting" lens in terms of specs, with 56mm and f/1.4 you can get portraits with a very smooth background blur. If you are okay with a lens without any aperture ring, the Sigma 30/1.4 is also a great option. I very personally really dislike lenses that do not have an aperture ring ... which is the reason I never used the Sigma's on my Fuji. But I know the Sigma's are very good! Especially the X-E4 is pretty awkward to use with a lens without aperture ring as there's only one single command dial, so you have to toggle between adjusting the aperture or the ISO.

[@CryptoJones]

The star trek reference earned a sub from me!

[@tomscameras]

Many thanks! 🖖

[@rewwhiskas4234]

I've just ordered this for my old x-m1, super excited to re-discover it (along with some exciting new film sim recipes) as the 'throw in your bag' / always there, ultra compact street cam my main x-T3 camera never was..

[@tomscameras]

Yes, the 27/2.8 goes well with the small X bodies!

[@npdady]

Just snagged a great used deal at only MYR 340. Thanks Tom for the great review, pulled the trigger thanks to you.. Been wanting a small af lens for my xe2 to complement my kit lens. Sometimes I just don't wanna bring a big lens (big for me at least) to a day trip or a hike.

[@tomscameras]

Thanks for your feedback! I hope you have a lot of fun with the lens!

[@dragangrasic1328]

Very nice review, thanks! This new lens looks great and it inspires confidence that other TT Artisan AF lenses for FujiFilm will follow.

[@tomscameras]

Thanks Dragan! Yes I hope they’ll introduce some more autofocus lenses and maybe also decrease optical vignetting the next time 😀

[@dragangrasic1328]

@@tomscameras I think some vignetting at this price point is okay, the lens has character. :) For more perfection there is the Fujinon XF27.

[@marcp.1752]

If you want to go super-cheap, you can choose the Meike 28mm F2.8 pancake-esque prime lens, it does have issues with flare here & there into specific light situations - but otherwise, i've found a few years ago already, it's a really sharp lens, and for that little money...one can't go wrong. No AF, hereby. With the usual focus peaking feature, not a problem after all. The Meike costs usually between ca. 68 to 82 EUR nowadays.

[@tomscameras]

Hmm, if I would want a manual-focus lens, I'd rather get something like the TT Artisan 25/2 then, one stop faster and easier to use thanks to the clicked aperture (and if you go through the hassle of adjusting, also very easy-to-use infinity setting). The manual focus 25/2 is dirt cheap as well. I admit one of the reasons why I always review TT Artisan lenses is that I find clicked aperture and that hard-stop infinity setting so very important in everyday use. Maybe not everyone agrees with me here, and then other manufacturers like Meike or 7Artisans or also Laowa etc. of course offer great options. I did once compare manual focus with autofocus in my videos: the TT Artisan 35/1.4 vs. the Tokina/Viltrox 33/1.4. I see very valid points for both types of lenses.

[@marcp.1752]

@@tomscameras Hi Tom, first a happy new year 2023! I do own both lenses, both the TTA 25/F2 and Meike 28/F2.8, so it serves a slightly difference purpose, hence for focal length, and lens speed. Both have issues with multicoatings, which could being improved. OTOH, the TTA 35/1.4 is less sharp, less microcontrast vs the 7A 35/1.4, both are into Leica M Mount, and after i've seen Erick's video 1:1 samples comparsion, it was pretty much clear to me, the 7A (7Artisans) is the more sophisticated 35/1.4 lens design, it also comes with an integrated lens hood, whileas the bajonet-mount hood of the TTA 35/1.4 virtually does nothing - reviews showed clearly, that it does flare here & there, wheter the hood is on or not, it doesn't help seriously. What's more about to say about this, the newer 7Artisans 35mm F2 seems to be a winner too, it's smaller than the 35/1.4, and optically even a tad better. 🙂 Nothing against TTArtisan, and i do like my 17/1.4, 50/1.2, 23/1.4 and 25/2 APS-C lenses, but when it comes to M-Mount, 7Artisans is into all reviews the better, sharper lens, means the 28/5.6, 35/1.4 1:1 comparsions...no offense. I am always glad, to see new, affordable lenses - wheter it's TTArtisan, 7Artisans, Youngnuo, or -Viltrox, for example. Viltrox really upped their game to a complete new level - with their release of the XF 75/1.2 PRO AF lens - i really hope for a XF 23/1.2 PRO within this year and 2024. 🙂 I'm waiting for fine produced content into 2023 for this channel - and like to watch your videos here since the beginning. Keep up the great work, Tom ! All the best. Greetings.

[@IanHorne1967]

Great review! Thanks! I shall becan owner on Monday 😁

[@tomscameras]

Thanks! I wish you a lot of fun with it! Hope you‘ll like it!

[@kimc5750]

Thanks for this great review. I just ordered one, positive now I will enjoy using it. 🙂🙂

[@tomscameras]

Hi Kim, I hope you have a lot of fun with your lens!

[@donaldcongdon9095]

Nice review as usual Thomas! Thanks. Interesting to see TTArtisan branching out into more sophisticated lenses. Many of their manual lenses are excellent, so I'm curious to see where they go with new ones.

[@tomscameras]

Thanks Donald! They're already selling an 32mm f/2.8 full-frame lens for Sony, but I rarely do review lenses for the Sony mount today, so I didn't try it. Many say that things go downhill with the camera market in general, so it's always good to see some competition and also new entries to the market! I am also curious if this lens will sell well and how TT Artisan will proceed from here. Still, very personally, my heart beats for the manual lenses even more!

[@TryingtoLearntheuke]

Hi Tom-one thing to note, the firmware updates can only be done on a PC. Can't be done on a Mac. Love the video.

[@tomscameras]

Ugh, thanks for pointing out! That's quite an issue for Mac-only users actually ...!

[@robmas57]

Very nice review Tom. I had the XF27 MkII for a few months. I could never feel comfortable with the autofocus noise. Got some looks from people because of that noise. I understand this TTArtisan version is considerably quieter. I may give this one a try. I’m not a big bokeh fanatic so would likely shoot it at f5.6-f8 except in low light. I would probably use it on my XE3 or XT30-II. Thanks for the honest review.

[@tomscameras]

AF noise was not an issue at all for me when using the TT Artisan but in all fairness I also didn’t mind it that much when using the XF. Of course there are lenses that are 100% silent and have a faster AF but those all are also bigger and less pocketable … so as a walkaround lens the TT Artisan is a good and inexpensive option, yes!

[@KGeorge-1]

A very honest and direct video. Thanks Tom!

[@tomscameras]

Thanks Kevin, I am glad you like my review!

[@VOByRobbins]

Great review and super thourough! I enjoy your style of presentation! you've earned my sub! Cheers!

[@tomscameras]

Hi Michael, many thanks for your feedback! I really appreciate it! :)

[@oc2phish07]

An excellent video Tom. I have been considering the Fuji 27mm for some time now but I think I will try to get a hands-on test of the TT Artisans one as soon as possible. I already use two of their manual lenses and have been impressed with the quality and performance of those.

[@tomscameras]

Thanks for your comment! While I realize videos like mine are very helpful, nothing is better than getting your hands on the lens yourself before you actually make your buying decision!

[@oc2phish07]

@@tomscameras An update. I have now bought the lens, updated the Firmware from the TTArtisans website and started using the lens for street photography here in London. So far I love it. I am also VERY impressed with the after-sales service I got direct from TTArtisans after I sent them an email. Got a really helpful reply within a couple of hours.

[@michelonwordi3202]

Thanks for your real world and honest reviews.

[@tomscameras]

Many thanks Michel!

[@HarpSealsDFW]

Hey, Thomas. Thanks for a great review of this lens. I didn't see this mentioned, but it's a critical factor in my decision. How quiet (or loud) is the autofocus motor?

[@tomscameras]

It's quiet, much more so than the Fujinon 27/2.8 XF. (I don't know if Fuji changed anything there with the version II.) I didn't test video AF performance at all though.

[@helmym5296]

thank you, i'll do correction on LR

[@tomscameras]

In the end, that always gives the best result!

[@aucourant9998]

I would never use a 27mm lens to try and acquire bokeh. For me, these lenses are for landscape or street photography; for street photography, I normally shoot at about f5.6.

[@tomscameras]

Yes! This lens is perfect for street and travel, and if you add a bit of post processing (for example to correct for vignetting) it’s also good for landscape!

[@euclideureka1142]

Love your reviews

[@tomscameras]

Many thanks! 🙏

[@jasonm129]

Can’t wait to get mine, it’ll be delivered today 😂

[@tomscameras]

I hope you'll have a lot of fun with it!

[@jasonm129]

@@tomscameras I jus took a couple test shots , sharp at 2.8 , autofocus good, vignette is there but I can work around that!

[@DmitrijPaskevic]

It's a fantastic lens for the price. Sharp upwards of f4 and I don't care for the vignetting for £99 that I bought it for.

[@tomscameras]

Yes, price and performance are the strong points of this lens!

[@BerndtOtto]

Thanks for that great review. Got this lens even cheaper. Less than 130 Euros on eBay … new, of course. Really a steal !!!

[@tomscameras]

Oh yes, that's a good price. Wish you a lot of fun with it!

[@AntonyBall-h9g]

I have the lens in my collection I like it for size and style its a nice lens and a bargain at the prise.

[@tomscameras]

Yes, price/size/performance is great and as you say, the style is also great!

[@simonwilliams2109]

thanks Thomas.

[@tomscameras]

Thanks Simon for your feedback!

[@vl7182]

Great video. 2 questions 1)What is that attachment and camera strap your using? 2)In your opinion is the aperture ring make this worth upgrading from the old Fuji 27mm without the aperture ring?

[@tomscameras]

1) You're not the first one who asked - but unfortunately I can't give you an answer! I got that camera strap about 15 years ago from a friend as a gift and I honestly don't remember the brand or anything anymore! It also doesn't have any branding on it. Sorry! 2) that's a very personal question: for me, yes, the aperture ring alone is enough reason to prefer this lens over the old Fujinon 27/2.8. I really dislike lenses without aperture ring, especially on the X-E4 (only one single command wheel)! But apart from that, the original Fujinon is a good option.

[@vl7182]

@@tomscameras Thanks for the reply, I really like having an aperture ring too so this lens at this price is very appealing.

[@osirispluto5124]

Thank you for your review.

[@tomscameras]

Many thanks! 🙏

[@franciscomeseguergarcia8186]

Hi Thomas, One question. What about chromatic aberration? That's the missing point in this video, but I think that this lense does a good job for it's price. Thanks for this kind of videos showing to us cheap alternatives for Fuji's system.

[@tomscameras]

Hi Francisco! You're right, actually! In my testing, chromatic aberration wasn't a big issue at all with this lens. You can see a hint of "false color" at very small branches of trees against the sky if you shoot RAW. In JPG it's all gone, I guess that's because the Fuji's in-camera JPG engine takes care of such small aberrations. Hope this helps!

[@larrymccormick3226]

All's you have to do is replace that POS little lens "hood"with a real hood and the flare magically disappears ! As long as you don't shoot directly into sun. I just wish it was metal, not plastic ! Also , they really should include proper hoods and snap caps with all lenses and I'll gladly pay more ! I love the zebra lenses and I wish they would make all their lenses zebra's/ black and that all had electronic connections more for the data transfer than auto focusing. I got this lens because I got it used for a great price and I must admit I really like it for street photography. But I also wish it was faster ! I mean why not beat Fuji with a 1.4 at least ? They need to start pushing for higher quality and to top what Fuji has offered now that we know that they can make quality lenses ! And maybe some of their lenses made only for Leica could be shared too !!! LarryMac

[@tomscameras]

I get that they started with this pancake style lens and "only" f/2.8 because maybe that's easier to build, given that TT Artisan is pretty new to designing AF lenses. But you are totally right: Now that they've proven that they can do AF, they should also go for f/1.4 lenses in the future :)

[@neilmontgomery3470]

Hi Tom, just wondering does the camera correct for the vignette if you shoot in jpeg? If not what do you need to stop down to so the vignette is not noticeable? Also if you use a proper lens hood, not the silly one they supply with the lens will this help with straylight/flaring?

[@tomscameras]

I included some JPG out of cam files, so the answer is no, it won't really automatically correct for vignetting, at least not on the X-E4. Sorry, I didn't try the lens with another lens hood.

[@neilmontgomery3470]

@@tomscameras Thanks for replying Tom. You can remove the vignette quite easily with software and it can be useful with portraiture when stopped down, so not really a deal breaker. I think I might buy a third party lens hood as the one that comes with the camera seems pretty useless.

[@aeonbreak4728]

how do I make sure my fuji body will correct the distortions in JPG? is it automatic or should I mess with the settings?

[@danj2235]

Thanks for the review and your honest opinion... This lens is in my wish list, do you know how the AF performs in older bodies like XE1? Its listed as compatible but... I dont really need ultra fast focus though, Im used to the XF18mm f2.

[@tomscameras]

Hi Dan, sorry I don't have access to an X-E1 anymore, so I can't comment on that! Maybe you can get some info from other X-E1 users in any Fujifilm forum, or in the Fujifilm section of the huge DPreview forum.

[@craigzievis2074]

Hi, I'm new to Fuji. I shoot RAW + JPEG. Is the RAW image always uncorrected or is that a setting? I've never noticed anything like this, but my lenses are perhaps better?

[@tomscameras]

The automatic correction of lens files in RAW is always a bit of a black box. It depends also on the lens manufacturers and also on the specific RAW converter. Normally there will be automatic correction of vignetting, maybe also some tweaking to contrast, saturationand e.g. chromatic aberrations. There are also lenses and cameras where distortion is also automatically corrected but Fuji normally doesn’t do that. (You still have a lens profile available in e.g. Lightroom which will correct distortion as well).

[@parranoic]

Mine had no AF / MF and it was 250 euros. Many had the same complaints on Amazon. TT responds slowly and only offer a 5 day warranty. I managed to fix it, the rear element is not straight on some copies, just had to realign it by pulling on it with my finger

[@tomscameras]

That sounds really bad, sorry to hear that. But many thanks for sharing your experience here! And also thanks for the hint about the rear element. Over here in Europe, you get 2 years of warranty by law on any new product. So if you live in Europe and buy from any dealer over here, or also if you buy from Amazon Europe, that warranty will apply.

[@don7117]

11:35 so, price aside, you would prefer Fuji's 27mm over this one? And @ 14:28 - is this smaller than the Fuji 27mm f2.8?

[@tomscameras]

Hi Don. Price aside, I would, in the end, always prefer a Fujinon autofocus lens to any other brand. The main reason simply being that you can 100% rely on a Fujinon lens to work on ANY Fuji X body, past and future. Firmware issues can be ennerving when buying off-brand lenses, no matter how hard they try to make it work. Again, I did not have any issue with this TT Artisan on my X-E4, but there no guarantee that it will work as flawlessly with anyone's cameras. BUT I can't leave the price aside - I find the current Fujinon 27/2.8 just way too expensive for what it is, at least if we're talking normal retail prices. Personally, I just would not get any f/2.8 standard lens for 400ish Euros or Dollars. If you want to buy a Fuji X-E4 and it comes with the lens bundled, and you're paying much less, and you really want the 27/2.8, then go for the Fujinon. If you have to pay 300 ... 400 Dollars or Euros to get one, I'd always also consider more interesting alternatives, such as the Fujinon 23/2 or the 35/1.4, or also Viltrox 33/1.4 (yes I know they're all bigger ... yes I know, the Viltrox is off-brand again.) If you're asking me if I'd prefer the TT Artisan over the first-generation Fujinon 27/2.8, then my very personal answer is YES: The old Fuji 27 doesn't have an aperture ring and I really dislike that a lot. Especially on the X-E4. But, again, if you totally don't mind about aperture rings, and/or you're e.g. shooting an X-S10 or something like that, then the old Fuji 27 is a great alternative ... I said above why!

[@duschbrauser]

Just based on image quality, which lens do you prefer. TTartisan 27mm 2.8 or TTartisan 25mm F2? Thank you...

[@tomscameras]

The 27/2.8 is sharper and has a better control of flare etc. Only vignetting is a bit better controlled with the 25/2. You'll going to apply vignetting correction to images taken with the 27 more often (for example you can do it in Lightroom).

[@duc_le_photography]

Hi Tom - how would you compare this against the 25mm f/2 in terms of image quality? Btw, I had the Fuji 27mm f/2.8 but never liked it (thought it lacked any character and it felt like a toy). Thanks!

[@tomscameras]

The 27/2.8 is definitely sharper at f/2.8 towards the borders and corners, the 25/2 needs to be stopped down a bit more to show even sharpness all across the frame. The vignetting of the 27/2.8 is stronger. If you're looking for more character and like to play a bit with bokeh / unsharp backgrounds, the 25/2 is of course the more interesting lens out of the two. The 27/2.8 however, like its Fuji counterpart, is designed to be the most compact, pancake-style lens with the added benefit of auto focus.

[@ben.huynh.2012]

Danke , danke ! Wuerdest Du sagen , das hier ist besser als das alter Fuji 27mmf2.8? Ich habe vor das alter 27mm in Silber zu kaufen, bekommt man billiger als Gebraucht.

[@tomscameras]

Hi Ben! The only real advantage of the new TT Artisan is that it offers an aperture ring. If you’re happy with a lens without aperture ring, get the Fujinon.

[@thejacksons3019]

How does this lens compare (sharpness / contrast), with the 16-50mm kit lens, at the same focal length? Worth having both lenses?

[@tomscameras]

The 27/2.8 is definitely sharper, especially towards the borders and corners. Contrast is good on both these lenses. If you value to have a super-small lens from time to time, that is even smaller than the 16-50 kit zoom, yes then it's worth having both. In my opinion, though, I would want a faster lens as a second lens next to the kit zoom ... for example an f/1.8 lens or something like that!

[@thejacksons3019]

Thanks Tom. Just bought. Main reason is being compact for pocketability and inexpensive for an autofocus Fuji-fit lens. Don’t take many indoor photos so f2.8, stopped down where necessary, is hopefully ok for outdoor photography.

[@joewe7]

Hi Thomas, wie ist die Schärfe im Vergleich zu dem Fuji 18 - 55 mm F 2.8 - 4.0. Hast du diesbezüglich Erfahrungswerte? VG

[@tomscameras]

Hallo Joe, es ist schon eine Weile her, daß ich mit dem Fujinon 18-55 fotografiert habe, damals an der X-E3 mit 24 MP. Mein TT Artisan 27/2.8 ist ehrlich gesagt sogar etwas schärfer als die Bilder, die ich mit dem 18-55 gemacht habe, vor allem bei den offeneren Blenden (also eben z.B. f/4) und dann in Richtung Bildränder ist die Schärfe beim 27er etwas besser als bei meinen Bildern mit dem 18-55 bei vergleichbaren Blenden. Dafür ist die Vignettierung beim 27/2.8 allerdings ganz klar stärker!

[@joewe7]

@@tomscameras danke für deinen Eindruck. Das TT ist dann ein no-brainer für den Preis.

[@HogbergPhotography]

Was it tested on the XT100 or XT200 which is what the target group actually uses?

[@tomscameras]

I used this lens on the X-E4 only.

[@toxotis70]

I find it 200 euros in Greece, almost the same price as a used Fuji 27mm…what lens would you buy ?

[@tomscameras]

If you value the dedicated aperture ring, then the TT Artisan. If that doesn't matter to you, go for the used Fujinon (but of course when buying used, always make sure it is in good working condition).

[@jojoanggono3229]

I have XF 50/1.4 awesome, XF 18/2.8 don't like this, XF 23/2 don't like this. Thinking about getting TTA 27/2.8, I think I will like the vintage look. I have several vintage M mount and screw mount lens which I really like but did not work well with X-Pro1.

[@b3943024]

What is the model number of your camera strap? Thank

[@tomscameras]

So many viewers of my channel ask, and I'm sorry I can't tell you. This strap was a gift from a photographer friend many years ago, and there's no branding on it. So I honestly don't know who made it!

[@richardschrader6011]

If I just shoot in jpeg, would that “ solve” the heavy vignetting for the most part …???

[@tomscameras]

No, with the TT Artisan 27/2.8 there’s no automatic correction of the vignetting in JPG.

[@richardschrader6011]

@@tomscameras thought there was a reference to in camera software re taking jpegs that helped to correct re vignetting,,,not that it would be totally eliminated but that it would be substantially reduced,,,as contrasted with just taking pictures in raw ,,, and I have the xs10,,,so figured that it is new and advanced enough to have that correction software,,, seemed like distortion was similarly treated re taking jpegs vs raw

[@richardschrader6011]

@@tomscameras and forgot to thank you for the prompt reply,,,and greatly appreciate your insights and judgement in all things fuji 🙏

[@Angela8779]

can i use this on my x-a3?

[@tomscameras]

Yes it is designed to work on all Fuji X cameras! But please keep in mind: I only used it on the X-E4 so I can't tell from personal experience how it performs on other Fuji X bodies.

[@Angela8779]

@@tomscameras noted, thank you so much :)

[@willgraves1258]

I really wanted to get this lens but the vignetting is too much for me I think

[@tomscameras]

Yes, the vignetting is strong and needs correction often.

[@buchsg]

I’m pretty sure the vignetting is due to the lens hood… looking at it, it’s seem way too small in diameter for the 56° field of view…

[@tomscameras]

Maybe the hood has some influence on vignetting. But to be honest I shot with this lens also without the hood attached and it was still an issue.

[@KeeptalkinSPit]

6:44 is that color fringing on your hair? It looks purple

[@tomscameras]

Thanks for pointing out! I think the lens isn't prone to purple fringing overall!

[@olegasphoto]

Do you have a channel in German?

[@tomscameras]

No, I don't!

[@stoplossM4]

Does anyone know if this is compatible with the XE -2 ?

[@tomscameras]

The lens *should* of course be working with the X-E2 as well but I can't tell you from my own experience. I'd advise you to ask in a big online forum like the DP review forum, there should be a huge user base who can tell you about their own experience.

[@jungholee7036]

So, should I buy it or not?

[@marcp.1752]

It depends, if you need a ~41mm (27x1.52 APS-C cropfactor) prime lens. Many reviews said, at F/4 it's much sharper, better useable than on F/2.8 aperture.

[@tomscameras]

Maybe I'm lucky then? My copy is super sharp at f/2.8 already. Absolutely no complaints there! Only the vignetting can be distracting at f/2.8 as you see in my sample shots ...

[@marcp.1752]

@@tomscameras Maybe Tom. Since you've got it directly via TTA, it seems to be a hand picked copy - no offense. I've seen so far all reviews via YT, also the Fujirumors Minireview, which was the #1 on YT weeks ago. :)

[@tomscameras]

That’s the problem with all these autofocus lenses: they’re much more complex inside and also use more plastic parts. So there’s more sample-to-sample variation. Many manufacturers have sorted out these issues today because they do autofocus lenses for decades… I think if my lens performs so good in sharpness, the lens design must be pretty good in sharpness. It also corresponds with the MTF curves that have been published. But yes, I can’t say anything about possible sample-to-sample variations.

[@marcp.1752]

@@tomscameras Hi Tom, i wrote you a long reply here..but perhaps (you?) it just became deleted...i think, that's not a good exchange of thoughts, *if* things happen like that...and only one opinion stays here at the end...no offense. Have a great evening.

[@dandanu2526]

Nothing special on this little one...I'll wait for other focals with AF from TTartisan. Thank you,great review.

[@tomscameras]

The 27/2.8 is nothing special, that's right - but sometimes still very handy, otherwise also Fuji wouldn't make such a lens as well. But yes, some more "exciting" new AF lenses would be also great !

[@mex5341]

color is bad

[@tomscameras]

You mean, in the sample shots taken with the lens?

[@henkvrieling9586]

Unnecessary annoying music

[@tomscameras]

Thanks for your feedback. Unfortunately, you can't get it right for everyone when it comes to taste. Some like the music and for others it's unnecessary ...

[@Wow_wow1]

Decent or not, TT ARTISAN? What’s up with the name? Gotta change.

[@tomscameras]

I won’t argue with you about this :)

[@maciejryglewicz9775]

"This lens was provided to me by TT Artisan .... " Sorry Tom but ... its not review. Its sponsored AD.

[@tomscameras]

Thanks for your honest opinion! Of course, I disagree - I really put all my effort into showing you not only the strengths, but also the weaknesses of this lens, and I back it up with a lot of sample photos. There's one thing though that I should have pointed out in my video more clearly. Also see the comment of Marc P. further below in the comment section: There might be sample-to-sample variation, because mass-production of autofocus lenses is no easy task, especially at this price point. I can obviously only talk about the performance of this one copy of the lens, and yes, it's a sample that I got directly from the manufacturer!

[@maciejryglewicz9775]

@@tomscameras i love your channel but now i cant agree with u 🤝

[@tomscameras]

Point taken, and again, I'm really happy about you being a critic and honest viewer!

[@I922sParkCir]

In what way is this sponsored? TTArtisan provided him a $160 lens that he spent hours filming and editing for a review. The reviewer definitely has far better lenses that he would use in outside of a review, so having this additional lens doesn’t provide much value after the review is finished. Also, the review wasn’t too positive. It was basically “this lens if good if you need something at this budget, and stick to JPEG’s. If you shoot raw or want better decent performance the Fujinon is better”.

[@kristersjoblom4025]

First, a big thanks for another interesting, informative and enjoying video! 😀 It is not uncommon at all that well-known photographers and vloggers are loaned equipment for reviewing. Thanks to that we as viewers get access to more tests and information. As always you have to process and evaluate the presented information yourself and assess pros and cons with regard to your own photography. I think Tom does a very good job and he is not silent about drawbacks or less good performances of tested gear.

[@paddyola1]

I didnt see any chroma checks, but it looked good

[@tomscameras]

Yes, I should have added some sample photos about that. Thanks for your feedback!