That was a great idea to make the additional test by combining the two. Interesting to see that it generated an even lower coefficient. I didn't expect that. I thought it would remain equal to the Tungsten.
@alouisschafer7212 Жыл бұрын
The wear scar with only WS2 or h-BN was 6.5mm with your test method right? So there seems to be a synergy of some kind between these two compounds... maybe add in some MoS2.
@limyiphun61424 жыл бұрын
Hi, can you please test WS2 + ZDDP? I have read research articles that seem to show they have synergetic properties when mixed together and better anti wear properties. Well, actually it was with IF WS2 (inorganic fullerene) not just plain WS2 though.. thanks!
Жыл бұрын
Thank you. Where do you purchase your powders? Would you recommend Aliexpress? I live in Germany
@igor2030ign4 жыл бұрын
Great tests! Try PTFE, which is also named teflon. I bet ptfe will win the race!
@edogsx4 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/qpnVm6KQobt6n6c
@igor2030ign4 жыл бұрын
@@edogsx thanks. Never knew this has teflon inside.
@edogsx4 жыл бұрын
@@igor2030ign Yes, it is a Teflon base additive.
@santosj22744 жыл бұрын
Ur channel is great!!
@kevinshi94354 жыл бұрын
must use Submicron hexagonal boron nitride, otherwise the oil filter will be blocked.
@mbaster4 жыл бұрын
You should compare photo without mixing :) from previev wideo
@mbaster4 жыл бұрын
Thanks :) awasome chanel
@edogsx4 жыл бұрын
you are right... however you can see the 6.5mm scar to the right of the photo in this test ... Thanks for your support!
@sleeper1653 жыл бұрын
Stupid tests that in no way correlate to the hydrodynamic wedge of lubrication in an engine.
@bobirving6052 Жыл бұрын
Except that the test is not stupid, but your arrogance makes you stupid. Your piston rings leave the “hydrodynamic wedge” every time they stop at top and bottom. Cold starts situations could benefit also, along with shock loads and more that I don’t know yet.