Twitch Encoder Comparison BF2042 | Web Presenter VS ATEM Mini Pro, VS x264 slow | 8000kb/s

[@roodly3266]

ty

[@nicduch]

For gaming, i prefer avermedia ez recorder 330. 169€ streaming in 1080p60 with passthrough 4k60 and recording possibility by usb or micro sd card in 1080p60 @40mbps max

[@roodly3266]

So atem mini is good for double setup + cam ?

[@towercgaming7891]

I use it for such a purpose. It is ideal, for simple productions which do not require many overlays and sources. It is ideal for one main source, like a gaming PC, with a camera and some other sources to show. The encoder is not made for fast FPS - comparable to x264 fast. For all other purposes, it is ideal and highly recommendable. Also, I use it as a monitoring device, where I connect several devices to one monitor, for convenience.

[@towercgaming7891]

I would always say yes, but only for up to 1080p.

[@nicduch]

Web presenter HD have a nice encoder quality compare to Atem mini

[@towercgaming7891]

The 4k version is faster in 1080p compression. Movement in games is less pixelated. The HD is not much better than Atem Mini Pro, but better overall, yes. However, this is in fastbpaced games. For video, the differences are neglectable.

[@nicduch]

@@towercgaming7891 which equipements are between your pc and your web presenter 4k?

[@towercgaming7891]

@@nicduch Theree is none, just a bidirectional SDI/HDMI converter, which is needed to get a signal in from the GPU to the converter. It acts like a monitor. You can clone the screen to it or use it as an extended monitor. Second allows for e.g. OBS to do the production work and then feed it to the second monitor, the encoder, while you game or work on the main monitor. I do this in 4K. Sometimes, if I do not want to loose any performance, I clone the main monitor to the encoder directly. Then, you have no overlays and such, but often you do not need it at all. In this case, performance is 100%, as encoding is being done by the external device.