Typhoon vs. Rafale: Which is Better for Ground Attack?

The choice of which aircraft is better for ground attack or dogfighting depends on the specific needs of the operator. If a country needs an aircraft that can carry a heavy payload of weapons and has a long range, then the Typhoon may be the better choice. However, if a country needs an aircraft that is agile and can maneuver well in close combat, then the Rafale may be the better choice.

[@nicklanfear4303]

I was going to buy a typhoon until i heard the rafale was 10 million less.

[@pahadivlogger0426]

😭

[@trumpstinyhands]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@angeloleon6670]

Buy an F35A if you don't mind the maintenance cost, buying a carrier capable fighter is pointless unless you also buy a carrier and those thing use a crazy amount of fuel, speaking from experience

[@nicklanfear4303]

@@angeloleon6670 ya I can't swing a carrier, bank denied the loan.

[@BittuG9]

Despite f35 is good but countries won't be buying and depending on it Since USA has bad reputation of blackmailing countries during war for spare parts

[@robsonsakamoto4779]

Just to add that the Rafale can be operated on aircraft carriers with a catapult, while the Typhoons cannot.

[@chucky6187]

Depends on which model

[@victormelchy1264]

@@chucky6187Of course, he was probably talking about the Rafale M (Marine)

[@user-xq8vv7pq6j]

Obviously!@@victormelchy1264

[@LesbianCroissant]

And it is the only non American carrier jet that is permitted to land on American carriers

[@maecarpenter69]

Big problem with a lot of videos from this channel, the narrator ends up repeating themselves constantly, it's very irritating

[@Across_Media]

We are still fixing that problem.

[@maecarpenter69]

@@Across_Media Brilliant. Thank you. The channel covers some really interesting topics and it'd be so much better if you could fix this issue and say more about the topic in the time you have in the shorts. Lovely to get a response.

[@Across_Media]

No problem. We very much welcome the opinions and criticisms of our audience.

[@-BuddyGuy]

These AI generated shorts are complete AIDS to watch, a new cancer for the internet that will make us all dumber

[@M20100]

Its likely AI

[@Bringyourownhammer]

I wouldn’t want to meet either of these jets in a dark alley 😮

[@henryairconcepts2999]

Why? You can climb into the cockpit and pretend to be a pilot. It's fun

[@Bringyourownhammer]

@@henryairconcepts2999 😁

[@Rose_Butterfly98]

Not sure they'd fit in an alley

[@shantanuroysarkar3371]

@@Rose_Butterfly98 maybe the rafale M can with it's foldable wings 😉

[@benjaminleguennic7349]

​@@shantanuroysarkar3371The Rafale M cannot fold its wings, it's not necessary given the rather compact delta wings configuration 😉

[@mikefm4]

I love how many pronunciations of Rafale we got in this one video

[@null9283]

The primary drawback of typhoons is that their parts are manufactured in different countries, necessitating good relationships with all of these countries to obtain the necessary parts.

[@rid1bee]

It's pronounced "Ra-fal". Not Ra-fael nor Ra-fel.

[@rid1bee]

@IllyricumSlavonicSakura1996 not really

[@TEEEEEEEG]

it's pronounced rafail

[@rid1bee]

@@TEEEEEEEG what rafail? Rafale is a French word, therefore it should be pronounced the French way.

[@vanderwallstronghold8905]

​@@rid1beeI think what he's saying is that the Rafale is failing for some reason. Not sure if he's serious about it or joking.

[@vanderwallstronghold8905]

​@@TEEEEEEEGbecause the Rafale is clearly successful.

[@igi3471]

Also the Rafale is a lot sexier than the Typhoon

[@Dshotundo]

Cap

[@xYoshiLP.]

Dumbest comment i've ever read

[@homa7289]

Omg😂

[@TonyMontana-lu3yb]

Definitely much better looking.

[@Rosseboi]

Rafael is just better. Massive respect to the French for protecting their industry and picking the best. Don't change France. You're proud and many of us respect you for protecting your sovereignty

[@KingKong-zr2ry]

Bullshit

[@KingKong-zr2ry]

France copy the typhoon, Rafael is a bad copy

[@Rosseboi]

@@KingKong-zr2ry lol that's why it's got more exports than the Euro fighter huh? It's worse...but sold more? 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@jnicofarenq3389]

@@KingKong-zr2ry Rafale sell export 300 eurofighter sell export 140😂😂

[@mrsentencename7334]

@@Rosseboithe French sell to anyone that’s why

[@sunitarajput2626]

And another factor is supply chain For rafale , you have to be dependent on France alone for spare parts But for typhoon you have to be dependent on 3 countries for supply chain

[@mattgummerson8370]

How is this a disadvantage? All aircraft sales are endorsed by the partner nations and this applies to spare parts. A larger competitive supply chain would most likely reduce costs and lead times

[@sunitarajput2626]

@@mattgummerson8370 wrong First of all adding other countries in supply chain doesn't affects the cost Second, if any one of the three countries went at war , your supply chain will be disturbed And third is geopolitics For example India has good military relations with France and UK but not with Italy and Spain So rafale becomes an obvious choice because there is less chance of getting any issues with France as compared to Germany, UK , Italy and Spain

[@bluemaverick4268]

@@sunitarajput2626matt is right the Rafale is better

[@cannibalronny7314]

​@@mattgummerson8370that girlie means that is why India bought the Rafale. Better to handle one nation than 3 when wartime spares are needed

[@mattgummerson8370]

@@sunitarajput2626 we’re talking about spare parts here, not aircraft. Having a competitive supply chain definitely reduces cost, having a monopoly on a spare part discourages a company from reducing their price. Also, a lot of the Eurofighter parts are interchangeable with NATO aircraft so there’s the economies of scale savings. Some of the parts are interchangeable with Rafale but key components were purposely selected that do not include US content

[@pblpbl3838]

🇬🇷🇨🇵❤❤rafale

[@LuqmanHM]

Such simplistic conclusions.......

[@stevenh.5181]

There’s just something about the Rafale ?, That says , anytime/anywhere!!!😏😏😏😊

[@johndoe-cd9vt]

"difficult to chose which one is better" it's not difficult, it's very easy except if you know nothing about this topic

[@moteroargentino7944]

So... Rafale.

[@Aidcaa]

No not at all in range the typhoon would dominate and in a dog fight os a walk in the park for the typhoon

[@XimCines]

You should try Jas-39 Grippen against Typhoon. Quoting a Typhoon pilot: "It can get scarely close when it's ECM are on". First day in red flag 2006 they took down a Typhoon.

[@Tintin-qq3no]

@@Aidcaaexcept for the range, the typhoon as been completely inferior to the rafale in every simulation, he is right to choose this one

[@angelaferkel7922]

​@@Tintin-qq3noyou clearly have not informed yourself to truly believe that the EFT is inferior in every ways except the range. The typhoon is a LOT faster at mach 2 and has also a higher thrust to weight ratio simply stronger engines. The rafale is an overall well ballanced multirole fighter made by france to match their requirements, including naval use. The eurofighter was created by germany and spain and france at the beginning to create an overall fighter that was more capable for the role of air superiority. Its why the EFT has very powerful engines, high t/w ratio and good range

[@Tintin-qq3no]

@@angelaferkel7922 it’s fact, in every simulations, the rafale win, you just don’t inform yourself

[@mba2808]

Rafale is much better. First series of EF doesnt even support A/G

[@xYoshiLP.]

the Tranche 1 doesn't even exist anymore Many are now fitted with the Tranche 4

[@sonikUk]

Are there still people who are asking the question in 2023? Seriously ? 🤣 I just remember that the Typhoon project was born following divisions with the French because they wanted an omnirole capable of landing on an aircraft carrier and above all of waging war and not a hunter just for surveillance of the sky. They nevertheless managed to release the Rafale 3 years ahead of the Typhoon when they had started its construction after them 😂 The Typhoon is a commercial failure for export, it had very few customers outside the countries that manufactured it. It is also a technological failure since their big mistake is to have made a pure air-to-air fighter and today they are trying somehow to give it air-to-ground capabilities to repair this error. Except that the result is mediocre, he always needs to be accompanied by another plane to designate the targets. It is more than 10 years behind the technology of the active antenna radar, it is a considerable delay. It is unable to land on any aircraft carrier. However the Typhoon has anti-radar missiles, good maneuverability and powerful engines, it is really good aerodynamically as a fighter, I wouldn't say otherwise. The Rafale is currently the best-selling fighter plane in the world. 😎 It has always had a better rating than the Typhoon in international competitions. Every time 😂 Brazil, India, Switzerland, South Korea... It has a very advanced AESA active antenna technology radar. Infrared missiles with a range unique in the world. It can carry out all missions: surveillance, air-to-air, air-to-ground, air-to-sea, nuclear, suppression of enemy defences, reconnaissance, monitoring of terrain at very low altitude (unique in the world). Unlike the Typhoon which is just designated air air. It can take off from any type of aircraft carrier, ski jump or catapult. It has greater payload capacity in everything: more armament, more fuel, more hardpoints (14) Today the European consortium bitterly regrets not having listened to the only aviation expert on the European continent: France. The Rafale continues to improve with its F4 version and soon F5, it is expected to fly again until 2060/2070 while we are already approaching the withdrawal of the Typhoon for 2035. You realize the enormous difference between these two devices? It's huge. 😅

[@KingKong-zr2ry]

Bullshit, you baguette fanboy, Rafael is a bad Copy

[@mrsentencename7334]

It doesn’t matter because both of these will be irrelevant with ai controlled drone swarms and directed energy weapons

[@xYoshiLP.]

tf are you saying, the Typhoon has a lot more and Better CAS Weapons France was just Part of the Project so they could Steal British and German Designs

[@listerofsmegv987pevinaek5]

The typhoon is a fighter jet and ground attack jet

[@sonikUk]

@@listerofsmegv987pevinaek5 N O

[@bcm-n7244]

The Rafale has a better design, the jet engines of the Typhoon feel stuck on! ... my thoughts only on the looks of the 2 planes.

[@deltaboss1190]

Do Gripen NG vs F-16 Viper.

[@ultralordd7625]

Used to duel my buddy on Air Combat, I used a variety of aircraft, he used the EF2000, he always painted the landscape with my aircraft.😂

[@soso8112]

Ouf on n'est pas bon qu'à faire des baguettes 🎉🎉

[@alvinnormason5170]

Although I'm more of a typhoon guy, but man u don't have to disrespect rafale by calling it rafail multiple times

[@user-be2qp6cg3z]

Typhoon is like j-10C😊

[@satheeshnarayanan701]

Moreover Rafale is integrated with Nuke and Marine version is also available

[@drshaileshkumar3361]

Rafale is more proportionate looking aircraft then EF . EF looks like all the part joint together just to make a product . Look at the air intake. When the are so close to each other what is the use of having two air intake and position of canards ? Just like concords aircrafts i know its must be a technological requirement but how rafale manage to get things proportionate ???

[@jean-loupdesbordes4833]

EF makes me think of a sturgeon .

[@drshaileshkumar3361]

@@jean-loupdesbordes4833 😂👍👍👍👍

[@drshaileshkumar3361]

@@jean-loupdesbordes4833 wow what a imagination . But ET is a capable fighter .

[@bub99554]

I like the look of the rafale intake fuselage better that square intake doesn't cut it

[@Kevinmiller1179]

Is it just me or did KZbin copy Tik Tok with all these short videos. 😮

[@wilhelmpech5914]

France 🇫🇷: Can I Copy Your Guys Homework? UK 🇬🇧 Germany 🇩🇪 Italy 🇮🇹 and Spain 🇪🇸: Sure Just change it up a bit so it’s not obvious.

[@jnicofarenq3389]

😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣

[@CapitaineNemo1]

How can France can even copy Eurofighter ?? Both rafale and typhoon are based on the mirage, and mirage is a french aircraft. In fact, Typhoon is a total copy of the rafale, i "chinese" copy with inferior capabilities

[@jacoborodriguez9885]

​@@CapitaineNemo1jajaja good imagination write a book

[@CapitaineNemo1]

@@jacoborodriguez9885 That's a fact. When France was a part of Eurofighter, the plan was to build a delta wing fighter with the base of a mirage.

[@hdemuizon9034]

A bit of history here : 1) Rafale and the eurofighter are based on the Mirage 4000, a french aircraft. 2) the first design proposed for the Eurofighter was a french design, and it became the Rafale (so we were the first). 3) The first plane to fly was the Rafale. 4) When you don't know don't talk, you might ashame yourself

[@Maplex1030]

Also since you put this video up in the newer models they have an even more advanced touch screen system behind the stick

[@alexandrelarsac9115]

The seconde A in "Rafale" sounds like the first. Not Rafel Ra-Fal.

[@jaimonmathew6464]

India choose raffale

[@rafaeloreirorodriguez5278]

I still miss in the skies the panavia tornado

[@xYoshiLP.]

Come to Germany they still fly here xD

[@JGL841]

Planes like this are so complex that I refer to fighter competition evaluations made public. Two leaked evaluations were from the Netherlands and Switzerland. The Netherlands evaluation was pretty revealing. Sorry, KZbin doesn't allow links that aren't KZbin.

[@nabilahmed3446]

But typhone flight cost is only 3500£ and raffel flight cost is 10000£

[@BittuG9]

Car cost is 5 dollar 😂

[@hdemuizon9034]

et non c'est l'inverse justement

[@kapilarora-ej1mv]

10 Years se inko abhi tak nahi pta chala who is Better..

[@reggievonramstein]

Not Rafael, Rah-fah-le Worst is he said it right several times 🤷‍♂️

[@PROTLxONgame]

I wish they made Rafale's refueling probe retractable, it would make the aircraft look amazing

[@doctoramrit9485]

Ohh. Just in time video recommendation. Typhoon was in my shopping cart for xmass. Any way hope they give discounts for Rafael on black Friday.

[@nkvneeraj1]

Typhoon

[@TheKatakali]

Rafale. Twin seat variant D, more payload, SPECTRA EW system, better low altitude capabilities, nuclear capable. The Rafale was made to be a multirole fighter, while the Typhoon is the better interceptor and BVR and high altitude fighter

[@onesplash0one819]

Yeah but the typhoons are 20 times less than 1 b2

[@tthams73]

Capable depending the opponent and mission.

[@stevenh.5181]

Only 90 Mil = shift ?, I’ll take two.😂😂🎉🎉

[@Sahil_0211]

Rafale is most beautiful Jet ❤

[@PeterLukac-kb1pg]

Typhoon = ♥️

[@wiktorjachyra1869]

The e.u would be better off merging all the military aircraft manufacturers into a mega cooperation like lockheed. No need to have so many small companies with small budgets......merging already proved successful with Airbus

[@pastis51marcel]

Naive view. Ok for military cooperation but not for merger. Countries than can remain sovereign should do so. You never know wh’s going to pull another brexit on you, go rogue or have racist governements that you would need to support just because they build your fighter’s landing gear.

[@jeromeportier4914]

You mean one giant corporation that can lock you in a project, blow timelines and budgets and milk you to the tale of $1.5 trillion? Err… no, thank you!

[@quibster]

Sharing proprietary tech is not going to happen. These are private companies. They already cooperate, however on a project to project basis. For example BAE systems supports the development of a lot of modern fighters.

[@wiktorjachyra1869]

@@pastis51marcel fair point on how you can lose your manufacturer because of politics

[@maonarin6038]

typhoon is the best dogfighting

[@user-xq8vv7pq6j]

You see these claims that Spectra is better than Promethean, but is there any evidence for that? What, exactly, makes it "more advanced"? "Rafale has a more advanced targeting system"? What? Typhoon can use Litening 5. Do we really think Damocles XF is going to be better? Damocles wasn't regarded as competitive with Litening 3, so Thales will have done well to close the gap, let alone overtake Rafael. Or perhaps they're referring to the OSF, which does admittedly include a laser rangefinder.

[@kranzer2370]

The damocles pod is no longer in production, it has been replaced by the Talios pod for a while

[@user-xq8vv7pq6j]

@@kranzer2370 Does Talios include an SAR?

[@jkim6200]

The ASRAAM, the best name for an air-to-air missile.

[@bobbychhangte9591]

Why typhoon electronic not upgrade

[@listerofsmegv987pevinaek5]

What he doesn't say is the fench walked out of the euro fighter project putting the development back five years. They left because they wanted all the juicy bits, the other members said no. So the french went in a huff and left with the research upto that point.

[@rolandbihot7944]

Faux le cahier des charge était pas compatible

[@LT_Clara]

The French wanted a carrier version, the others did not. so, France made their own Jet

[@hdemuizon9034]

When you don't know what actually happened don't say bullshit please

[@jean-loupdesbordes4833]

This is total romance. France just wanted an omnirole plane marine convertible not peculiarly a dogfighter. That explains the differences of perfs (speed and altitude) Anyway apart of that it's true that "mirage 4000" existed for good way before Eurofighter project that came out from scratch. The most significant fact is that UK should have made the same choice and when you see the erratic life of UK aeronaval today you understand. France should have two carriers but UK have them for nothing. Well I mean one old harrier and two overrated F35.. At list Rafale is US Carrier compatible.

[@zdenkapitner2424]

I am happy for my country bc it is getting rafale and getting rid of old mig 21

[@Gavroche97]

Rafale canard wings allows the pilot to see the ground for impact evaluation, not the Eurofighter

[@xYoshiLP.]

you can barely See the Canards of the Typhoon from the Pilots Seating Position sure it may take up a little space but it doesnt make a big impact

[@user-sv6me8ut2s]

Thyphoon climb rate 62 000,..n rang march 2..rafale clmb 42000 n march 1.8..thypon Cheaper thn rafale

[@honeybadgerbomb4469]

Typhoon cannot Supercruise with its fuel tanks, Rafale can without much hindrance, btw

[@humbertbrito]

As far as I am concerned there is also the advantage for rafale becaise it is better for carriers.

[@raymondwilliams2609]

It's pronounced Raf-aahl, actually. You're welcome ! 🤗❤️✌️🖖

[@TheBadBunny87]

The problem with these videos are the keyboard experts in the comments.

[@mergimgashi9225]

Eurofighter cost 100M euro, but F35 5th generation cost 110M. Is this possible price ?

[@xYoshiLP.]

the EF-2000's export Price is about 90-100 Mil if Germany Italy Or GB would "buy" one it's only 21Mil

[@YellowEvoV110]

Well the french were involved in the euro project until they said nah and made their their own shit and stuff.

[@jacoborodriguez9885]

Ground atak rafale ,air vs air typhon

[@petesure5966]

Why not mention speed?

[@tommyarnold890]

Because as jet era combat evolves speed is becoming less of a factor. A slower stealthy fighter with a decent payload and fuel efficient engines is more of an air to air threat. Because it can control an airspace for a longer period of time and choose when and where to engage.

[@airprok8328]

Everybody thinks speed is everything and it really doesn’t mean anything anymore. If you notice, the top speed of the best fighter/ attack jets is becoming lower and lower and it’s for multiple reasons. F35, F22, Super hornet and the block 111 upgrade. Those are just 3 to name a couple. Thrust to weight is a hole not her story and those 3 along with the F16 and F15 are great jets for that. Traveling at mach 2 and higher are really bad for jets and their coatings, brings on more maintenance and extra unleaded cost.

[@tommyarnold890]

I'm waiting for the AF to build a whale. Imagine a drone the size of a B-2 that flies with an AWACS. It's entire job is to carry massive amounts of ordinance. While on station the smaller fighters use the whale to launch ordinance which they then take control of and guide into the target. Considering the B-2's payload that's a massive leg up in the field of firepower to be brought to bear from a handful of stealth fighters.

[@airprok8328]

@@tommyarnold890 nice

[@_Eurofighter_Typhoon_]

Потому что французы будут плакать от стыда когда узнают что их багет не может разогнаться даже до 2 M😂

[@23Drazse]

European high technology What switch? Airbase: Typhoon Carrier: Rafale

[@jelepettos1894]

Airbase:rafale Carrier: rafale

[@doncarlitos6145]

Does this video make any sense apart from clickbait?

[@KillRei]

Yes, it does make sense. Which part of it is clickbait?

[@davidk6264]

French vs German/British/Italian

[@charbelh.boutros4971]

It’s not a “raphaèl”, it’s a raf”aah”l

[@pro_cod-player19]

Croatian air force just bought 12 rafale's for 999mil euros

[@user-mn5tv4gb8s]

Staat Theiland Bangkok say Yesterday night Daed 6.5 Millions people

[@aakku2876]

????????(🎉)😊😊

[@pascalschark7875]

Typhoon Stommewindt

[@nicknick4156]

This video taught me nothing. Absolute dross

[@injusticemattersuk4744]

typhoon The Eurofighter Typhoon is the world's most advanced new generation multi- role/swing-role combat aircraft available on the market. It represents the peak of British, German, ltalian and Spanish collaborative technology in avionics, aerodynamics, materials, manufacturing techniques and engines. Eurofighter Typhoon is Europe's largest military collaborative programme. Eurofighter Typhoon is the only fighter to offer wide-ranging operational capabilities while at the same time you can't really compare the Raphael to the typhoon because the typhoon is a lot more newer technology and better it doesn't matter because the typhoon is a lot more movability and faster than the raffle jet

[@jnicofarenq3389]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@hdemuizon9034]

How could you be so wrong ?

[@jee_aspirant7]

ok then i will buy rafale

[@sargunangoppalan7809]

Rafale

[@AWLOOPER-Yt]

same plane design f22 better

[@jsfbr]

Another AI crap.

[@God_Of_Nissan]

In looks, the Rafale. Overall, F-16

[@carottefondeurenfer]

I know, USA! USA! USA! But seriously, the Rafale is a league ahead of the F-16

[@victormelchy1264]

@@carottefondeurenferYes. It would be wiser to compare the Rafale with the F18

[@God_Of_Nissan]

@@carottefondeurenfer NUH UH

[@Tintin-qq3no]

@@victormelchy1264 nope, to the f35

[@Axel-gh6vj]

@@victormelchy1264no, it would make more sense to compare it to an f-35

[@albertcrawley2258]

Uro is garb

[@livinglucky9158]

90 millions or a 100 millions euro each? no wonder people are paying high taxes in europe 😂😂

[@jeromeportier4914]

Well, the Rafale program has cost around $50 billions. The F-35 program around $1500 billions.

[@KillRei]

​@@jeromeportier4914$1500 billion is a lot more than any country is willing to pay for. No nation is willing to fund R&D for an aircraft program that cost more than building a space station.

[@jds2470]

Here the question has arrises:- The rafale has advanced in electronic avionics warfare but capacity of engines Power is 1.8 mach only . At least if it would be 2.4 mach speed it will be considered most best . But you didn't say anything about Typhoon mach power & electronics aviation power, why ? If you compares you should mentioned it . How much is speed ? What facilities are radar and electronics aviation power . . Range & kmph speed & ilfting capacity & climb up of high etc etc you should clarified it . Otherwise there is no meaning of comparison . Thank you.

[@stuartthornton3027]

Unfortunately you can only get so much info in the time for it to be a short. A quick run down on which aircraft may possess a slight advantage in certain situations.

[@airprok8328]

Top speed does not matter anymore. It is not a drag race. Crazy top speed is awful for a jet and it’s skin because of intense heat and makes you a juicy target. Mach 1.8 to mach 2.0 is really as high as you wanna be anymore. Also, people have to maintenance these things witch costs money, and range is also better when you are not drinking so much fuel because you are flying at mach 2.5 and higher. This is not 1980 anymore, stealth and range are top of the line. Yea, the F16 is great for what it is but it can only be that for about 2 hours,if you conserve.

[@oswaldoportella2364]

Que avion tan feo ese typhoon

[@misiex221]

Speed difference of 583km/h? Rafale is slow

[@airprok8328]

Again, you have zero clue what you are talking about. That French jet isn’t bad because it only can do mach 1.8, that is not slow. The F35 is only mach 1.6 and it is the most dangerous platform next to the F22’ witch is around mach 2.0. You have to fuel and maintain these jets, do you realize that? Crazy high speed only makes it crazy high costs, and for nothing…. This is not 1980 anymore, technically has moved on for a long time now.

[@misiex221]

@@airprok8328 well, it seems you have zero clue. It is not the main factor but still It is still part of air superiority to be able to intercept or not to get intercepted after mission. Most of modern fighters can quickly intercept Rafale which is the slowest one by far! F35 is still much faster while it has stealth shape, cant even compare those two.

[@airprok8328]

@@misiex221 no, I have every clue. No need to be but hurt. It’s about thrust to weight, not top speed. Go back to DCS, I’m sure that’s where you came from because all you simple minded do, you think it’s real life and death. Both fighters in question are both very capable platforms but it has nothing to do with top speed and everything to do with capabilities and bring back and efficiency. Tell me your rank, until you do, you can keep your thoughts to yourself. Don’t get caught in arguments with people who actually know how any military actually thinks. The F22 is about to be retired and that is even being retired by a slower top speed platform, but with the best sensor and radar capabilities. If you can’t be seen but can see everything, it doesn’t matter how fast you go and the faster you are, the easier you are to see.

[@misiex221]

@@airprok8328 I see you may be a little bit hot minded. 1. You are talking about stealth, and compare Rafale to Raptor. If jet has no stealth then it is better to be fast, neither concerns Rafale, it is not stealth and it is slow, Raptor has both stealth and speed. Even his multirole 6th gen stealth replacement will be way faster than Rafale. 2. Agree, it is about weight an trust. Rafale has similar weight and frame and 20% less trust comparing to Eurofighter, this is main reason why it is slow. Everybody know that it has weak engine comparking to top jets. 3. I wrote it is slow, which is the fact and it matters for non stealth jet. Why you try to deny it and arue about things i didnt mention? Overally it is capable 4th gen fighter, comparable to Eurofighter beside weak engines and speed. 4. Rank? Are you a fighter jet pilot or an aircraft engeneer?

[@r.b6170]

They are essentially the same aircraft

[@thisisusandourlife4175]

Who named that missile the asraam 😂😂

[@Moondoggie3000.]

If it's like amraam it probably stands for advanced short range air to air missle

[@rushabranawat]

Asraam Bapu

[@sriakumar4368]

Typhoon is far better than Rafle but too costly

[@hdemuizon9034]

Moe expensive and much worse you mean

[@warrior_singh111]

Tejas mk1A is affordable 😅😅😅 One shld buy it

[@get_it_done4580]

Rafale better than OVER RATED typhoon GRIPEN better than rafale

[@Axel-gh6vj]

Gripen is not better than rafale but it’s drastically different, and for some countries the gripen would be better, but from an omnirole standpoint the rafale is just better. The strength of the gripen really depends on it’s utilisation and the use of the country, sweden’s uses makes it an amazing fighter jet who couldn’t be replaced by any other jet

[@jeromeportier4914]

I think even Gripen fans know it’s inferior to the Rafale. They don’t really compete for the same markets (even if they sometimes end up in the same tenders). If only because the Rafale is bigger and twin-engine. That’s no disrespect to the Gripen which is a great plane: incredible bang for your bucks.

[@tristanmartinez4023]

Too much corruption involved with the Typhoon. You'd have to deal with globalist EU countries who can each hold your spare parts until you meet their demands. 1 or even all of those countries can cut you off the supply chain if you don't support their agenda like sending weapons to Nazi Azov battalion of Ukraine. You only have to remain on good terms with France for the Rafale

[@CapitaineNemo1]

In case of a real war, gripen will be overall better than any other aircraft in the entire world, inclinding f35, f22 and rafale. For the simple reason that it's a guerrilla warfare jet made for defence. @@jeromeportier4914

[@TheBigruss10]

haha the f-15 is better theres your answer.

[@user-xh3sn5jj7r]

I guess I'll just have to get the Rafale then. 10 million I can do a lot with that

[@jeffp5162]

I believe the French were part of the Eurofighter group and then pulled out. How odd the Rafale looks so similar, coincidence, I think not.

[@gregutdmglaucos3757]

because their specifications are quite similar, but you should not rely on the exterior, the rafale is more versatile than the eurofigter which is more of a hunter, and the rafale can be used on an aircraft carrier. it is precisely these differences in objectives that led to the separation.

[@RAFALESOLODISPLAYVIRTUEL]

ACX project ( rafale A ) was designed before the Typhoon......

[@hdemuizon9034]

the first design for the eurofighter was the Rafale's design. so yeah the eurofighter looks like the Rafale because they reused some ideas. the basis was the Mirage 4000

[@user-mn5tv4gb8s]

Staat Theiland Bangkok say Yesterday night Daed 6.5 Millions people

[@user-mn5tv4gb8s]

Staat Theiland Bangkok say Yesterday night Daed 6.5 Millions people