U.S.: China Exerts 'Unreasonable' Dominance Over Shipbuilding | Taiwan Talks EP550

[@xfactor6099]

But usa dominance over world reserve currency allowing her to print money is reasonable?

[@MikeM-cb7xv]

More propaganda. China’s economy is the 2nd largest in the world and 10 times the size of Korea’s, but no one says anything about Korea’s “overcapacity” on shipbuilding. Korea, which is not even one of the top 10 countries in GDP, makes up 25% of the world’s shipbuilding. The U.S. makes up less than 1% of the shipbuilding. Unfair trade practices is not the reason why China or all these other countries are ahead of the U.S. in ship building.

[@axizcorp]

South Korea ships never rammed Filipino civilian ships in Philippines territorial waters. China is harrassing everyone in their sight.

[@sinocare]

There is no amount of talk by anyone will change the dominancy of Chinese ship building capacities. Learn to live with it or even benefit from it is a sensible approach.

[@David_Lloyd-Jones]

"U.S.: China Exerts 'Unreasonable' Dominance Over Shipbuilding" Funny, my friends at Mitsubishi Shoji were saying the same thing about the Taiwanese, just the other year.🤣 Ain't Karma a bitch! 😒😢

[@RonaldWaltu]

These ppl look like Japanese working in taiwan

[@Zergcerebrates]

It's only unreasonable because the US isn't dominating. I'm sure they won't be saying that if they were the one dominating . It's like saying Boeing is unreasonably dominating the passenger airline manufacturing.

[@Rainy-daze473]

Of course, different perspectives = different realities. For the US China’s shipbuilding capacity is unreasonable because China is its adversary and the US needs to get it’s act together.

[@PandemoniumMeltDown]

@@Rainy-daze473 A bit late. Now the US seems to be becoming as malignant as CCP Land is...

[@freedomsong9747]

​@@Rainy-daze473does that even make sense?

[@Rainy-daze473]

@@freedomsong9747 to clarify, it’s not unreasonable for China to dominate the shipping industry. It’s unreasonable for the US to help fund their adversary’s rise in Naval dominance through business investment and favored nation trade status. Not to mention the technology theft that was allowed to take place and used on their carriers and submarines. And finally it’s unreasonable for the US to cut Naval spending while our adversary increases theirs.

[@freedomsong9747]

@Rainy-daze473 how did china devolved into an adversary after being a partner and the manufacturing lifeline of the US?

[@shundi4264]

US$1.6B propaganda will only harm itself more in the long run.

[@sungjane]

巴拿馬美國

[@patrickho8757]

🤣🤣🤣 LOL

[@DominadorNarag-md6hz]

That's wrong!!!!

[@shundi4264]

@@DominadorNarag-md6hz Anti China propaganda is a reflection of China achievement and other country's deterioration.

[@Jus_sayin]

Why is it so terrible that China reinvested profits from manufacturing into things the country lacks as opposed to hoarding it like the one percent does in America…. Somebody please make it makes sense.

[@johnmiller7310]

Looks like China is pretty smart and the world just can’t compete. They seem to be doing ok, I thought they were collapsing. 😂😂

[@luting3]

For such a small island like Taiwan, it holds unreasonable share of semiconductor business.

[@chekeocha4923]

Lol. US built n maintained over 200 plus military bases over the world is excessive n unnecessary

[@kcwong8011]

The US maintains 800 military bases in over 90 countries all over the world, & not 200 military bases. The US is very rich.

[@chekeocha4923]

@@kcwong8011 :LOL..that is why i mentioned OVER 200 bases..let's see if the USD is not world reserve currency anymore and with debt say reaching USD 60 Trillions...they can maintain so many US military bases?

[@PandemoniumMeltDown]

@@chekeocha4923 Fallacy, you weren't even close.

[@mastertrend4685]

800

[@FrancoisEustache-ed6gd]

It's simple China is not a radical liberal capitalist economy where the investors are looking for 2 digits return on their investments. Their government is reinvesting their trade surplus in projects that will improve the purchasing power parity of their general population. What is reasonable for them to do would be unreasonable to do in a radical capitalist econnomy. But they needed a growth of their maritime fleet for their growing maritime trade at the lower cost possible. Why not invest in domestic shipbuilding with their engineers that are specialized in lowering the cost of production of everything? Sound reasonable to me. Some of their business partners would like to buy their shps that have the best Quality/Price ratio of the world's market? Sounc reasonable to me too. Oh! Now they are dominant in shipbuilbing? It's the reasonable consequence of having the best Quality/Price ratio in a free market.

[@fabricemartin5561]

Ok but US exerce unreasonable dominance in military force. What about that ?

[@silafaupaulmeredith7251]

If you are the factory of the world it is logical that you also do the shipping ports hence the BRI but not bombs and killing in Gaza dont you think economic development and prospserity is better than US Military Industrial Complex

[@PandemoniumMeltDown]

You know what? I wish the media in my country was at least 5% as relevant and informative as Taiwan is! You guys are bafflingly good at what you do. Please remain as great as you are. The CCP warfare is absolute.

[@Vlad-qu5mt]

If you switch from spending on tanks to spending on ships And you have your NATO allies increase naval spending to make up for a lack in spending...

[@superphi]

I’m sorry but how can china’s ship build be 230 times when ur graph says China has 51% and US has 1% so shouldn’t that be only 51 times? And also China’s navy is only a little more then America and by weight is less then America. Also what is the purpose of this propaganda piece cause I don’t think it looks bad on China that they have 51% of the ship building capacity, China isn’t stopping u from building ur capacity of ship building seems like China is doing good?

[@hyuxion]

What, US still has 1% of shipbuilding? That is news to me!

[@Gemini73883]

USA can build up their shipbuilding industry but they cannot compete on price! So the USA should put an extra-territory tariff on other countries who try to buy Chinese ships! Trump should try it, he's "smart" enough!

[@czts4778]

Only if the USA is the only buyer of that ship will the use of sanctions against many countries destroy the dollar, as countries will try to avoid engaging in trade with the USA and prefer China instead.

[@RichMidasPapa]

Ship building industry is a high labor concentrated industry. Average salary of a Chinese worker is only about 10 percent of that of US worker. US needs to reduce its average social salary to compete with China.

[@johnpaul252003]

When you tune and expect nothing less than China bashing and act suprised!

[@lastChang]

Seriously, to gain some respect from other countries, the Chinese government needs to *stop its lies.*

[@josephnduaguibe]

Sucking that $1.6B propaganda money?

[@sungjane]

巴拿馬美國

[@Blixey-r9z]

I think you misspelt US.

[@dorkanderson4963]

This account has been spamming Western propaganda on KZbin comments for years. Pretty sure it's a group of government agents cause their comments are EVERYWHERE.

[@amunra5330]

How about the Deepseek eh.

[@luting3]

China is subsidizing every product they make. How bigger of China subsidy budget is?

[@TomMcinerney-g9b]

America is trivial in many sectors....

[@riteshraj998]

Welcome back beauty 😍

[@branbran9129]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@musiceol7]

Will Guangxi province replicate Guangdong's success? Can cities like Wuzhou and Nanning follow in the footsteps of Guangzhou and Shenzhen?

[@sungjane]

巴拿馬美國

[@greedyinvader9462]

Taiwan tsmc unreasonable chip making is ok?

[@vicentevaldez1696]

Propaganda😂😂😂

[@jamesc3622]

Where is the capital of the Republic of China?

[@Shadow-vb9rq]

Well, pretty soon the land in the world will be under water so ppl will need a floating lands and restaurants.