Unit 3 Review Civil Liberties & Civil Rights AP Government

[@CareyLaManna]

Hey I've made a NEW & improved Unit 3 Review Video, check it out here! kzbin.info/www/bejne/r3vIXnevpNOme7M

[@CorporateHoops]

This is great material! I am a teacher and I was wondering, if I could get some of your presentations for reference.

[@matthewboston4046]

Thank you so much, I have my test tomorrow and covid has made this class really difficult to stay on top of. This is exactly what I needed!

[@zerograph7820]

I learned more in this 15 minute video than the multiple hour-long sessions our teacher gave us. Thnx for the Help

[@funwillfunwill]

Selective incorporation is something that college board loves to sneak in on their essays. Everyone make sure to know this, as well as McDonald v Chicago

[@thegamerswirl]

si is like the one of the things i actually remember so its easier for me 😭😭

[@thatweirdscienceguy9880]

The last-minute cram is real!!

[@benjaminheim735]

DAMN RIGHT

[@mavisdom-animeonpiano]

Stone Johnson Vlogs yeep

[@miapia333]

sksksks same

[@pikmin5987]

Fr, literally 2hrs before the test

[@hannahblinn3844]

Wow this is the best review I've ever seen. Straight to the point and worth my time. Thank you so much! I'm gonna recommend to my friends!

[@CareyLaManna]

and this is my old one lol :)

[@CareyLaManna]

Check out my AP Gov Ultimate Review Packet--it has EVERYTHING you need to know to pass the AP Gov Exam!!! acdcecon.thinkific.com/courses/ap-government-ultimate-review-packet

[@newstoday732]

wow this is exsactly my presentation next week thank you soo much for this big help

[@CareyLaManna]

Awesome. Hey check out the new version of this video. Link is in the pinned comment and the description

[@enicholsfranklinuniversity]

"imminent lawless action"= clear and present danger. Mapp v. Ohio started the exclusionary rule. Gideon v. Wrainwright was free counsel only for criminal cases. McDonald v Chicago only applied to Illinois at the time. It opened a door though for other states to challenge gun laws and to apply it to their own states thru challenging them.

[@CareyLaManna]

Elizabeth, you're right about Mapp and Gideon. "Imminent lawless action" is from Brandenberg v. Ohio (1969) and provides the current restriction on free speech. Clear and present danger is from Schenck v. U.S. (1919) and is not the current interpretation of speech, but you do need to know it for the AP exam. McDonald v. Chicago made the 2nd amendment binding on all states. Check out this link for more info on McDonald if you're interested. www.oyez.org/cases/2009/08-1521

[@davidparsons6588]

Like freedom of movement travel from point A to point B in your privete automobile Thompson vs smith saprrme court decision on the right to travel without a driver's license as long as you are not for hire privete travel is a fundamental right to everyday activities for personal Gain

[@aliciamatthews3204]

Do we need to know DC v Heller Case?

[@CareyLaManna]

Not by name. McDonald v. Chicago instead

[@supersonic2778]

Test Time 3: The Testing

[@sotonchowdhury8144]

Thanks

[@starwarfan8342]

Thumbs up if Levinson brought you here