Universe's Brightest Object Confuse Scientists

[@EveryDooDarnDiddlyDay]

"Scientists determine these bursts occur every 10,000 years" - They wasted no time in pulling a random number out of their rears to keep that funding coming in, did they?

[@jedimonk362]

Thank you for all you do, thank you for picking up the mantle.

[@SeethePattern]

🙏 very much appreciated

[@daviddrew7852]

People forget that Black Holes started out as place-holders to compensate for the shortfall in mass required to hold galaxies together. They have been reified via the agent of speculative and abstract mathematics (mathmagics), and creative interpretation of limited observations.

[@HE-it9ho]

I guess it's easier to change the numbers to fit a mysterious nebulous thing when the observations don't match the model. Black Holes: An invisible thing we can't see that must exist because there's no other way to make the gravity math work. If it's gravity, then the forces must be so strong that "nothing can escape, not even light" ..at least that's how it was till stuff started escaping 😂 Dark Matter: Invisible matter that we can't see and cant interact with...it must exist because the math says there's too much mass out there... If There isn't some Dark Matter out there, then our model is wrong, so it must exist. Dark Energy: Invisible unknowable energy that must exist to explain the expansion of the universe...according to the math. So much of mainstream cosmology is broken. The new guys don't dare question the work of their predecessors if they want to survive. They can't question the reason behind their own funding. The money doesn't want to scrap the idea that they poured billions into, they would rather "make it work somehow" even if it means wasting additional billions on something that will never be accurate. Really sad.

[@____2080_____]

3:33 we should remember that by definition, black holes do not have energy bursts. If it’s a burst, then they rules out black holes.

[@t00by00zer]

Thanks for all you do!!! Gamma rays are produced in lightning discharges on earth. Why would it be any different in deep space?

[@shockwave326]

nope its the same discharges are discharges no matter at what scale

[@kimberlyboldt5213]

My husband said the same thing!

[@CMDR_CLASSIFIED]

No such thing as black holes or neutron stars. What you refer to as "black holes" are actually plasmoids. And neutrons will decay in about 14 minutes when outside the atomic nucleus. Also, electric currents create magnetic fields, and magnetic fields create electric currents. The two cannot exist without each other. I am glad that you understand plasma physics and the Electric Universe Theory. (RIP Wal Thornhill) Have a great day, Sir! And God Bless! o7 PS: You have a very nice voice. Quite pleasant to listen to. o7

[@LewdCustomer]

Smarty pants!

[@JJbm4233]

Thank God, your channel exists, especially with the loss of Wal Thornhill. For many of us, you are his successor. The Thunderbolts project as well as plasma and electric universe cosmology needs more brilliant minds like yours!

[@CMDR_CLASSIFIED]

@@LewdCustomer No, I usually wear overalls, but I digress!

[@jedimonk362]

@@JJbm4233 Hear Hear!

[@daviddrew7852]

Nail on head.

[@RicardoPetrazzi]

@6:58 - this looks just like the double-layer model as described by Donald Scott - no coincidence, I proffer.

[@sychrovsky]

Scientists ? - They are peeing on your feet and telling you it's dark matter

[@shockwave326]

now we know what happens during a breakdown of a plasmoid ty Gareth

[@critical-thought]

Any time high energy is involved scientists invoke mythical neutron stars, black holes, and/or catastrophic kinetic events. If they really want to understand gamma sources, study sprites and elves right here in our own atmosphere … they can be studied unambiguously in-situ in real time. I am SO on board with your closing comments.

[@sciencetroll6304]

So true. We can learn heaps from them.

[@warshrike666]

Exactly mate drives me mad.

[@kimberlyboldt5213]

Another excellent video! Well presented!

[@JoeDeglman]

I think that one thing the Electric Universe Community overlooks are the plasmoids that form above the magnetic poles of pulsars. Just a simple timed arc discharge between the remnant core and the plasmoid, above the pole, will suffice. Such plasmoids are apparent in both the Crab Nebula Pulsar and the Vela Pulsar. Simple arc discharge events can explain FRBs, without the need for the plasmoid to develop a jet from both polar jets. Also, the jets out of the Active Galactic Nuclei 11:10 have no evidence of charged particle flow in them, only neutrons which develop along the jets.

[@poppabearskitchen1769]

Excellent presentation, even my old brain understood the bulk of the discussion, thank you and be well.

[@abighairyspider]

Excellent work as usual. Thanks

[@markbarber7839]

Thanks for the video

[@JoeDeglman]

9:00. Someone shows this to Don Scott, for his failed anode-cathode dark or glow mode solar wind model. There is no way you can produce a plasma current flow through the vacuum of the interplanetary magnetic field, only an arc discharge.

[@mcaballeropose]

Thank you. Great vid!!

[@BarelyScience]

That was awesome! Thanks for researching and presenting.

[@YiOughta]

I have heard that sun drying certain monoatomic elements in petri dishes produces a mini powerful burst, enough to burn a pencil more than 3/4 but not knock it over.

[@DimitarHadzhiev-dd1yr]

Dear Gareth, thank you for the amazing content and all the time and effort you put to produce those brilliant videos for us. I have a question for you and I hope you have the time to answer it. After carefully studying the work of researchers like Ben Davidson, Douglas Vogt, Robert Felix, Randall Carlson and others, and after reading books like "The Adam and Eve Story", I am now convinced we are just two decades away from a cyclic catastrophe that happens every 12,000 years. All the evidence points towards the Sun flaring in a micronova, right when a weakening Earth's magnetic field reaches its lowest point and Earth's magnetic poles flip (magnetic excursion). Ben Davidson suggests the so-called "galactic current sheet", which our Solar system crosses, as a trigger for the micronova and the pole flip. Douglas Vogt shows evidence of recurrent novas that take place throughout the Galaxy synchronously, every 12,000 years. The latter evidence made me think some kind of cosmic network activity is more likely to be the trigger behind those events. Then I found the EU community and your amazing channel and realized what that "network" was. For the sake of argument, let's assume the above is indeed true. Do you think Birkeland current filaments may be the trigger for those events, as I think? One way this could happen is as our Solar system spirals along the local filament, it enters the stronger electromagnetic field of a bigger filament (as explained in your videos), and that field impacts all planets and stresses our star significantly. However, I am not sure this mechanism could explain the synchronicity across the Galaxy shown by Vogt. Another way to explain these events is to look at the Universe indeed as a neural network within God's brain, so to speak. Just like neurons send out spikes of electrical activity through the axons, we have electric density spikes sent through the filament network. If we assume the models suggested by Donald Scott and late Wal Thornhill (RIP) are correct, then we do see these spikes on the Sun every 11 years, then bigger spikes every 88 years (Gleissberg) and then even bigger on a 500, 2400 etc. years scale respectively, forming a harmonic series. At 12,000 the electric density spike is so high, that it indeed breaks the internal double layer of stars and they (micro)nova as a result. Please let me know what you think and if I have missed another possible trigger mechanism. Much appreciated!

[@daviddrew7852]

Most in the EU doubt the clockwork approach to cosmology. It is difficult to make predictions, and previous catastrophes also resist chronological analysis. Our solar system is anything but stable, and alleged global warming is the last thing we need to worry about, but what will happen and when are unknowns, IMHO.

[@xlr99]

I hear a lot from folks over the internets that "There's no currents in space because space has a net neutral charge".

[@musicsubicandcebu1774]

Freudian slip at 2:16

[@xarmanhsh2981]

Wait wtf you have only 31 k subs???? I have been binging for days now leaving your videos in the background and never checking the details. When i saw the 31 i thought it would say 31 mil

[@BB-cf9gx]

Thankyou.

[@brandonboulton2776]

Deeply appreciate your content. My drug of choice is this channel, thunderbolts project, Theoria Apophasis, etc...❤️👍 You All get it 😁.

[@keithking1985]

We need some huge flyback diodes to ease downs these GRB's..

[@madincraft4418]

I am a huge fan of EU and Scott and Wal. But a very rudimentary understanding of electricity and it's rules holds me back from a complete understanding. Do you know of a good Electricity for Dummies kind of book that might take care of my stupidity?

[@KentoLeoDragon]

Came for astronomy, left for politics.

[@WorksopGimp]

Zpinch overload and I think that's where matter is made

[@SuperRobinjames]

Thanks

[@jan-martinulvag1962]

Why do you talk about black holes when it is known that they dont exist?

[@jimihendrix991]

He was being 'ironic'..................................................... 😉

[@Dan-gs3kg]

Benefit of the doubt for expediency, he's already covered black holes.

[@JamesWebbKilledTheBigBangStars]

He must present the mainstream point of view as a content so one can see the ridiculous error in their theories.

[@GoryWory]

the slow pacing of video made me question my whole life..

[@ulyssesk7325]

everything is driven by vacuum this is why, and the reason why this is or else the universe would increase in order

[@ulyssesk7325]

but their is still sth. to add intelligence approaches infinity like entropy, but its not a paradox since entropy is a bit faster

[@marenagbg]

Since we do not yet know the full menagerie of astrophysical objects out there (we do not know if some neutron stars we are observing are actually quark stars, and of those some could be wholly enveloped in strange matter or just partly for example) finding the source of high energy phenomena is currently patch work Science unfortunately

[@davidwilkie9551]

Looking Glass Universe holography students will collate the current String Theoretical Standing wave-packaging formation of reciprocation-recirculation Singularity-point positioning e-Pi-i flash-fractal recognition of pulse-evolution positioning, revising the conventional terminology and replacing it with functional coherence-cohesion objectives vanishing-into-no-thing phenomena?.., ie reiteration of pulse-evolution perceptions required. This is the inside-outside i-reflection wave-particle nodal-vibrational emitter-receiver log-antilog interference event in line-of-sight superposition density-intensity pulse-evolution that is the optimal Centre of Time Conception thought experiment that is the focused here-now-forever example of existence, that re-acts Fluxion-Integral incidence of time-timing sync-duration recirculation resonance and shows the sum-of-all-histories reasons why we are this all-ways all-at-once continuous creation connection here-now-forever.

[@communitycollegegenius9684]

Truth is from a source (like god). There is no god. Thus there is no truth. I prefer facts in evidence. I will accept facts regardless of the source.