What Created Strange Rivers on the Moon?

[@jons2447]

Hello, Mr. Samuel; Thank you for all you do. When a channel is cut in soil there are spoils, the excavated materials. Regardless of whether moved by ice, lava, or water the waste is there. Unless the rilles are formed by electric action, as seen in experiments. Billy Yelverton has made videos showing how electricity moves dust. The electric action causes the materials to be turned to dust. The dust is then scattered so there are no spoils, no waste piles. IMO, that is key to understanding the rilles. AFAIK, electric action (AKA discharge machining) is the only way to excavate that much material that doesn't produce spoils or washed-out silt deposits. Have a GREAT day, Neighbor!

[@janreznak881]

Electro magnetic effects. Same for Valles Marineris on Mars. Fun fact: if you alive in about 20 years you'll get to see it in action for yourself.

[@222Krzycho]

Cosmic welding made by Sun outbursts. Ben Davidson, Ralph Talbot, Anthony Perat, Tornhill and others....

[@LuciFeric137]

I like where this channel is going

[@thedarkmoon2341]

Academia will never change their text books though.

[@chrisbanbury]

Finally an explanation that makes sense.

[@RicardoPetrazzi]

I think the single greatest clue to their formation is remarked upon early on in the video - by pickerings' notes - "their lengths are composed almost entirely of curves of very short radius". This tells me it's an electrical discharge characteristic.

[@adamlane8751]

You can't fool me. We all know Wormsign when we see it. Shai-Hulud is undeniable. "Bless the Maker and His water."

[@JammaLamma]

👍👍

[@0neIntangible]

Ice comet impactors, followed by rapid melting came to mind during the first half of watching this, however I dismissed that line of thought after Gareth's explanations in the second half with possible plausible reasons for these anomalies.

[@megret1808]

Clearly they are Lichtenberg electric discharge branchings. Sculpted side walls and flat bottoms easily demonstrated under laboratory experiment

[@fredfarquar8301]

Thank you for this historical review and analysis. I would be very happy if you would do one on the ‘chains of craters’ (rows of craters touching rim-to-rim) and/or the many large craters with smaller craters formed exactly on their rims. Electrical phenomena would most likely be the best explanation for those features also. The work of Billy Yelverton with high intensity electricity has shown all of these are common in various arc discharge situations.

[@inthefade]

I'm fairly certain that happens when an impactor hits at an especially flat angle. Unexpectedly, craters are almost always circular regardless of impact angle. I forget where I saw this and if it was demonstrated with simulations or demonstrations, but I recall being surprised.

[@fredfarquar8301]

@@seditt5146 Oh, really? Gosh, they must have a FANTASTIC maintenance crew up there that cleaned out EVERY LAST BIT of the collapse debris from those ‘tubes’! Because every collapsed lava tube on earth is filled with jagged fractured rock from what was the roof of the tube. Maybe we should get that crew down here so our collapsed lava tubes can look smooth and neat like the ones on the moon! 🙄

[@fredfarquar8301]

@@seditt5146 And just because you want to believe they are lava tubes does not make it true. There’s no atmosphere on the moon. There is nothing that could transform those many kilometers long rills into the smooth, semi-circular canyons evident if they were collapsed lava tubes. Or are you saying that the solar wind magically machined all the debris? Get real.

[@fredfarquar8301]

@@seditt5146 I guess you must have been there, so you KNOW all this. Excuse me, Mr. Asstronaut. You know nothing. Buh bye

[@fredfarquar8301]

“There are none so blind as those who refuse to see.” And you are so blind!

[@gregsmith1719]

Thanks, Garth! Great video. But I have come away now thinking both directions are possible -- Does the initial discharge begin at the higher site, digging a crater, then petering off down the hill; or does it start small downhill and increase going uphill to a final blast at the top? With the different charges where they are both directions seem possible. Which is it?

[@barrywilliams991]

The 4th Luna Conference was held March 5, 1973.

[@quinto190]

Really convincing! Didn't know all those features and facts about the lunar rills. Those seem to be better candidates for electrical scarring than everything I've seen on Earth so far (which is no surprise, because there is always water).

[@beautheory6047]

The plasma arc was between Aristarchus & Tamrin Basin in China on Earth

[@shockwave326]

electric discharge,,,, thats the cause and good job gareth keep the people who want to know enlightened

[@BrodyLuv2]

Wonderful presentation and really is the only possibility.

[@rossnolan7283]

Just a top of the head thought - such grooves look like a rolling object has trundled along leaving a trail . One possibility might be ball lightning or something of that kind , in any case something like the Leydenfrost phenomenon where little spheres of super heated liquid dance around until evaporating , repulsive forces semi levitate the 'activated' bodies just above the surface and they can move easily somewhat like a hovercraft which has no direct connection to the ground below . Ball lightning is still somewhat mysterious and all kinds of explanations from plasma to even antimatter are invoked . Despite having lived through the whole space program I cannot recall any such in depth treatment of the curious rill formations appearing on televsion or the press - congratulations on more illuminating and thought provoking ,intelligent coverage/discussion 'revelation' . Keep it up!

[@joelnorton9742]

The pic of the green glass has a hourglass formation. That's flying molten to solid forming only. Very interesting and this does seem to reinforce plasma outbursts. I would have assumed the glass was olivine.

[@philoso377]

Page 8:20+ Have you see what I see? Sound track on a vinyl record disc can be seen here. Sound track? All have their signature, V grove shape. While glacier form U shake grove, what made it V shape? V shape can’t be lava channel or tube. Water don’t make V shape river bed.

[@stevesherman1743]

Very very odd is the many craters WITHIN the rille in some sections of the rille.

[@Souljourney22]

Im glad you recognize the oddity! The moon is more odd than most people know. The truth is finally being exposed why we haven't gone back.

[@humanitech]

Always interesting to hear your reviews and thoughts on these intriguing features Gareth .,.but I am now curious to whether you think these electromagnetic events and lightning discharges are potentially cyclical patterns or cosmologically seasonal (if that makes sense)....Or just due to random / sporadic celestial interaction/reaction/impactor events...which then create the conditions to trigger these huge discharge events? As it would be amazing to think that one-day humans may actually witness another event on the moon. As it seems a common feature of the cosmos that many things operate in systems of frequencies, patterns and cycles

[@GHOST5663]

1st. Great video, thank you.

[@coyotehump8253]

thanks for this upload, this really helped me out!

[@t.o.g.sakafay2868]

It's electrical scaring you tarts!

[@ironhorsethrottlemaster5202]

It looks like a gigantic electrical discharge Machining which I think we should call electrical discharge material excavation

[@shockwave326]

there is a lot of uranium in the four corners area of the us and that area as we know was hit hard by electric discharge

[@MountainFisher]

Not as much as Florida, it's not called the lightning state for nothing.

[@kevinoboyle8939]

What if the difference between two sides (the Mares) are simply the result of dust deposits ablated through electrical discharge events between the Earth and Moon?

[@SumNumber]

Interesting look at these things. An idea that has not arisen is if you look at a mud hot spring you will notice that gasses rising up form bubbles that grow and then burst . When this bubble bursts it forms a perfect crater that has a center point that is always raised and pointed . I am wondering if this process also happened on the moon . :O)

[@JBulsa]

💧 mettling from the inside from earths ice 🧊

[@beautheory6047]

I can show where the Moon and Earth interacting creates the metal veins, oil deposits, and diamonds as well. Very important reason this information is repressed

[@nobigbang825]

Funny how NASA seems to possess a serendipitous luck when it collect its samples. I wonder who are the scientists plan and designate those areas of interests. Remember Deep Impact mission with the copper made impactor; good choice of material.

[@KaliFissure]

Always stimulating! 👍🤘🖖 First glance they look like runoff from melting comet impacts. Deep impact doesn’t make large river because depth has to fill before overflow and runoff. Smaller slower impact would have higher flow proportionally. Let’s see how first guess plays…

[@stimpyfeelinit]

do you think maybe the size/speed/charge of the foreign object is 'embedded' in the shape of the rilles?

[@arthurrobey4945]

The redacted areas of the photos of the moon are very interesting.

[@whig01]

The lunar landings are a bit questionable, you might want to look into that. Though no doubt robotic craft have capabilities to return samples.

[@philoso377]

Lower lands with diminishing width and depth, contrary to higher lands with more intense energy and landscaping? Could this be related to extraterrestrial charged body that higher lands take discharge from above more intense?

[@madincraft4418]

I think I saw a flash like this during the eclipse

[@BarelyScience]

Is there a link to Hapke and Greenspan's concluding arguments against the "down-cutting by a moving fluid"?

[@SeethePattern]

If you go to Juergen paper, link is in the description he lists all the sources although I struggled to find accessible sources for some of then

[@BarelyScience]

@@SeethePattern awesome, that will work, thanks!

[@christiansather8438]

why do photos on the moon look so off?

[@outside_the_asylum2573]

🤔

[@Souljourney22]

Thats because they are doctored! If you wanna see the real moon. I can send you a link. Most of the public still hasn't seen whats really their. Mind blowing!

[@toucheturtle3840]

We don’t know. That’s why it’s worth going back. 6 landings on the Moon amounting to about 3 days of exploration is akin to a 4 year old on a weekend break to the beach with their parents..

[@alphalunamare]

Absolutely fascinating and about such a dry subject! :-)

[@robertle3038]

Dark lava did it.

[@ProblemChild-xk7ix]

Underated comment!

[@MikeLyons2011]

🤣😎

[@Souljourney22]

If you think laba did that then you haven't seen the real moon.

[@MyCatJeff]

Since the moon is tidal locked, most subsurface activity will be different on the dark side, we should see fewer and shorter sinews.

[@jackerocket]

Check out the Electric Universe .

[@thedarkmoon2341]

There was never any flowing water on Mars, the surface there was also the result of electromagnetic forces.

[@donacha235]

As to the association between the rills and craters at the widest end. Perhaps we're seeing leaders and downstrikes as we see here on Earth.

[@MrHichammohsen1]

19:50 so the diameter of the small sphere should be linked to the frequency of the discharge?

[@glitterytrinket6246]

Super great channel.

[@aaabeverages7152]

There are moonquakes. It also is very close to earth and lamor frequency 42hz

[@JBulsa]

A large chunk of ice shot from. Earth into the moon at 68,000 psi. 4500 years ago from Noah's Flood.

[@Vermilicious]

So the arcing occurs on the side facing Earth. I suppose this happens if comets or asteroids come in-between, creating a tremendous light show. Now that would be something to witness. Also, if it is so that the Lunar surface facing the Earth is thinner, due to Earth's pulling and stretching of the Moon so that it grows on this side, there will be much less electrical resistance compared to the other, older side. The scarrings on the other side are more violent, momentary and less frequent (even non-occurring in "recent" times of a stable relationship with Earth and the solar system), and so the results there are big craters rather than "rills" and generally smaller craters.

[@LawofMoses]

What are the other paths within the paths. You can see the trail within the trail. Lava would act differently when no gravity or air to interfere with it. The moon looks like a mud pile that bubbled and then hardened!

[@drakedorosh9332]

At 14 mins it would be nice to cut to a vandergraaf machine doing the pie plate experiment where the pie plates are separated from one another and fly all over.

[@TheVenusApocalypse]

I’m gonna steal some of your discharge animation for my next vid. The moon was formed in a cataclysm… lever bro…and Khonshu….

[@SeethePattern]

Wow. The fact that you use the word steal says a lot. Many hours go into creating those animations. Drop me an email if you would like to discuss terms of use

[@Souljourney22]

@@SeethePattern why are there only animation and pics from never a straight answer (nasa). Its because you wont use live footage from an actual telescope to show the real surface of the moon. Lots of structures on that thing that aren't man made. The public is starting to learn the real truth. Maybe you don't know what your showing is not the real moon. If wanna see the real moon in all it's detail. Their are real moon channels showing the public the truth not animations and doctored photographs from nasa that don't show the amazing structures.

[@daviddavids2884]

5:12 does this photo make sense.?!? shadows in the craters suggest that the light is coming from around three o'clock.!

[@josephd.4890]

It would be easier to prove a giant had an ice cream scoop and scrape them popped into his bowl

[@sciencetroll6304]

At 1:10 the classic mistake made by amateurs and professionals alike. That formation is RAISED, not lowered. So it's a volcanic flow, a lava tube.

[@HTen-gl5di]

It's called a micro nova, part of what Apollo 17 was looking for was evidence of a solar micronova. They found it.

[@alexgonzo5508]

It's worm sign! The spice must flow.

[@megret1808]

The unexplained lunar light flashes still being detected appear on crater rims. This looks like electric discharging

[@megret1808]

It then follows that if these dielectric Lichtenberg discharge features are found on the moon and other bodies then it must have been taking place on earth as well and quite possibly within human memory only eroded by wind and water

[@noell8460]

when the moon was closer to Earth do you think the 2 could have been causing discharging one or both surfaces, could a plasma look like a liquid after it fell on an object

[@whatsinthat3657]

Pretty cool 😎

[@DEATH-THE-GOAT]

18:14 green glass has been found in the Sahara

[@ulyssesfewl1059]

18:39 "March 1963"? I think should be "March 1973"!

[@adairjanney7109]

simple when a tungsten rod gets going at relativistic speeds wherever it hits turns into liquid

[@daviddavids2884]

3:48 in VACUUM, water/h2o can ONLY be VAPOR.! ! !

[@mrglasecki]

the electrical discharge is By Far the most believable hypothesis, 😏 By Far, and could be easily proven by slag of the sub arc

[@DavidKirwanirl]

UFO passing by, letting off a few shots of the lightning gun, meanwhile monkey scientists confused thousands of years later

[@Hallands.]

Mud-balls! At high ground a muddy mixture is ejected due to both pressure and expansion by freezing. The low gravity on the moon combined with the absence of atmosphere causes such fast evaporation from the ejecta, it essentially levitates (like water droplets on hot teflon) as it begins an almost frictionless run downhill, depositing dust mixid into the water along the way, itself becoming smaller and smaller and finally gone! Do I get a reward, now? 🇩🇰🤗

[@Nobe_Oddy]

this is GENIUS thinking! and it only makes SENSE!! In our electric universe those that only see gravitational forces will go the way of the DoDo (and the Neanderthal) THANK YOU!

[@golddiver]

You ought to get together with Ben Davidson over @ Suspicious Observers...

[@megret1808]

Lichtenberg electric discharge figures

[@shamancredible8632]

All you people who think this is an electromagnetic effect clearly haven't heard of aliens

[@rodneyhearld8151]

Plasma discharges and Brooklyn currents created all those so-called craters 90% and all the other features

[@jayerjavec]

Electric discharge? Same as Mars.

[@ottolehikoinen6193]

Thank God those Soviet replicators failed when they did.

[@prosoporific]

If you have a clay ball and through rocks at it its bound to crack..

[@RickLambert963]

So, why don’t we observe these formations happening this way with all the different kinds of telescopes available to us? Did the electric universe stop being electric?

[@jmartinharris4866]

Yes, 10000 years ago global catastrophe was unleashed as the solar system was undergoing a change from one electrical equilibrium to another (Saturn Theory). This caused the Age of Gods followed by global catastrophe and the dawn of civilization.

[@RickLambert963]

@J Martin Harris - With current technology we are looking back 13 billion years, with the new James Web possibly as much as 100 billion. No formations as such happening. That’s all pseudoscience nonsense garbage from morons that even believe in aether, about as bad as flat earth nonsense.

[@bencoad8492]

im guessing they are rare events with the energies involved, and we have just not had good enough telescopes for long enough to see them, just wait tho this century is suppose to be interesting ;0

[@RickLambert963]

@Ben Coad - It’s more likely that this is just another of many pseudoscience cults, BS on the internet. I’ve gone far enough into the electric universe to understand there’s nothing of scientific method happening in this, merely speculation. We suffered the last 2 1/2 years from psychopath controllers shouting follow the science scamming the dumbed down mass that doesn’t understand the difference between science and pseudoscience.

[@christiansather8438]

this will be the ultimate smoking gun if we get lucky and catch massive electrical discharge on terrestrial bodies. there are plenty of reports in history and especially ancient myth of electrical phenomenon... we havn't seen much of in the 20th and 21st century.

[@christiansather8438]

you just schooled everyone, again

[@douglasstrother6584]

"Walking on the Moon" ~ The Police

[@icysteve46]

Bada boom Bada Bing

[@dermotmccorkell663]

No delta fans. Where is the excavated material. Sublimation?

[@tardigrade9493]

Background noise (music) garbled the speech.

[@TimDavies1955]

So there’s a huge one on mars eh ?

[@davidbosh7795]

SpongeBob SquarePants shows up at 21.37

[@garyglacken7128]

Electric universe.

[@Galv140577]

E L E C T R I C I T Y

[@ElectricUniverseEyes]

🤜🏼⚡️🤛🏻

[@davidwilkie9551]

Experimentalist's dream job, dispelling delusions. This video series is the cutting edge, maybe the transition to QM-TIME resonance logic inherent in e-Pi-i 1-0-infinity omnidirectional-dimensional holographic probability. What would a surface exposure of a giant horizontal Fulgerite phenomena look like? A Theorist is somewhat trapped by language in what is self-defining by Observation(?), and what is pure-math, yet to be tested by Disproof Methodology, ..artificial guesswork that is taught to Students before appropriately moderated Sciencing processes are attempted. The process of Actual-Artificial Intelligence analysis is overdue for curriculum reiteration.

[@TheLastOilMan]

you should have worked out that we havnt been to the moon. i worked it out 12 years ago, and im slow

[@79percentbig]

*Simple answer. ALIENS.*

[@MOEMUGGY]

Moon worms.. duh!

[@NameUserOf]

Don't give them ideas! Next time NASA's moon expedition will search for spice. And all of this with help of tax payers.

[@shockwave326]

rivers and lava tubes running uphill what a trash theory

[@Souljourney22]

Have you seen the real moon? not this cgi animation garbage they use to dumb down the public?

[@DEATH-THE-GOAT]

Swamp gas!

[@kazunorimiura3526]

see the pattern of Earth surface. you can look evidence of expanding Earth.

[@0U8123MTA3]

1:25 The UFO pilots that made these rilles also made riverbeds on Earth. It is written in Genesis. 22:50 Mars was excavated/mined for material that was used to enlarge planet Earth. That's why we have huge oceans and exposed continents when Earth was originally just an oceanic planet covered in ice. The UFO pilots that terraformed Earth and placed the Moon in its orbit also used Mars for resources in their work.

[@laurean5998]

Come on, it is so obvious those craters were caused by the moon colliding with a shower of giant space sperm!

[@whatsinthat3657]

Hurry up and make more videos. Lol

[@LewdCustomer]

a short history of descriptions of our moon. A snapshot of scientific spit-ballin' thesis, which are plentiful and mostly wrong.

[@MicahJKelly]

I'm not even going to watch one second of this video, because your thumbnail shows something that a kindergartner would say cannot possibly be a river, and you suggest that it is or was one. I can tell that you're a joke without knowing anything more. This is clickbait and misinformation.

[@SeethePattern]

Wait you won’t watch because of what you THINK might be in it yet you are happy to comment about something you know NOTHING about. Brilliant logic! And btw no it’s not water…

[@Souljourney22]

This is a fake moon rendition the establishment uses to dumb down the public. The real moon looks nothing like this crap. Either this guy is willfully ignorant. Or he's doing it on purpose.