Unveiling the Secrets of Age of Sigmar 3rd Edition

Welcome to #TheHonestWargamer.
============================================================================
All our Socials in one place:
PLEASE SUPPORT ON PATREON: / thehonestwargamer
CHECK OUT OUR AWESOME WEBSITE: thehonestwargamer.com/
JOIN THE TWITCH GANG: / thehonestwargamer
OUR PODCAST FEED: / the-honest-wargamer

[@seanduffy9948]

Bonesplittas and Beasts of Chaos get mentioned only once for a half second each. Having these armies feels like being in the titanic’s sick bay. ETA: not throwing shade at HW, just sucks overall being already forgotten about

[@DarkAzure00]

As a data scientist I love these trend lines omg LOVELY

[@shorelessskies]

As a data scientist, do you think win rate is a good metric?

[@FatCatEmpire]

Am I just missing it or did the 3+ win chart miss Nighthaunt completely?

[@anactualdino]

Came to literally comment this exact same thing lol!

[@JM-oj5gt]

They were displayed in ethereal text

[@sirbobulous]

Could you do a Meta Representation Over Time video for the factions? How has popularity changed quarter by quarter for each faction since data has been collected? That sounds like a fun story to tell, looking back on the years of AoS history through Stats rather than anecdote?

[@mnpuck]

Representation pie chart is super nice! but give counts too instead of only the % as it would help show the difference between armies.

[@cloraformsgood5340]

Deep dive !!!! Juggz !

[@l337haxz0rn00b]

Would it be possible to do analysis of win rate or positive potential with player rankings as a weighting? For example, you might be able to show that one army has a positive potential that is higher in the rankings if you only include the top 20% of players while another army has higher over all positive potential but dropped off after a certain point of skill. The data could also show ranking player bias, if the over mata for an army is 3% but 7% of top ranking players run it, then it's being at 55% win rate might actually be closer to 50% once you factor in player rankings.

[@mrbunning8051]

Awesome love it! 👌

[@shorelessskies]

Is the general speculation that Big Waaagh is going away with 4 and that orruks are going to be split between KB and IJ?

[@thehonestwargamerstreams]

Yeah

[@PhoenixExcess]

Hey now! DoT is playable if you play ~800pts of not Tzeentch!

[@slthlrdz]

love these graphics as always. great job team. juggz

[@avossins95]

I really think Bonesplitterz Drakkfoot is op. Hot take but what really can deal with it? I really only think Kharadron Overlords can but I don't know that army very well and maybe it can't.

[@minacapella8319]

It always amazes me that geedubz has actually managed to get, and keep, the game to/at a point where Meta chasing and power gaming/win at all cost is practically non existent and *ALMOST* pointless. This isn't what they're known for

[@nicog8009]

10:05 Why shouldn't I be playing big waaagh, can someone explain?

[@greybearddnd2417]

Big Waagh was pretty good a short while, until they fixed some of the battle tactics. Basically Big Waagh was 90% Kruleboys and some other stuff with 4+ braindead tactics, this was fixed. Now that Bonesplittaz go away, it might be that Ironjaws and Kruelboyz will remain and Big Waagh might not exist anymore.

[@cooljoe500]

because they dont fit together. should never have been in the same book to begin with. elves can have half dozens books, why shouldnt orcs?

[@cmleibenguth]

Disciples of Tzeentch being bad and unplayable? Whatever you are smoking is bad for your health.

[@creeperslayer92]

I play DoT and think it should be nerfed hahaha. This army is broken!

[@philpeters3689]

Thing is with DOT is can be broken but they're also really easy to break. It's all about the matchup IMO

[@thehonestwargamerstreams]

They are not