Update on Section 43 stop and search, and looking at the Coronavirus Act 2020

[@-Untitled-]

Please do that video on the acts, I like to listen to people. I'm stuck inside and any voice is nice.

[@-Untitled-]

Oh and stay safe out there.

[@t5jerry]

i think sergeant mayo used to be a soldier in the "hell-mans" province !!!!!!

[@mrichards55]

No, that was Colonel Mustard.

[@Stuart_George]

Together with Sergeant Pepper......

[@t5jerry]

@@Stuart_George been doing some research, apparently the sergeant in question was born in county "mayo" in Ireland 🤫🤫🤫

[@xwsftassell]

Social distancing and the police: The police have not been tested for coronavirus and are not practising social distancing. Therefore, if you are approached by the police, call the police. Then, when those cops show up, call the cops, because those cops haven't been tested either and aren't following social distancing recommendations. When all of the cops have been arrested by all of the other cops, they should be treated by NHS nurses. As none of the NHS nurses have been tested and none of them are practising social distancing, they too should be arrested. When all of the cops and all of the NHS nurses have been arrested and incarcerated, we get to reach "herd immunity", at which point, all of them can be released again (after having been charged and fined).

[@powertothepeople5706]

The word 'Act' means it only comes into force,if you give your concent.As we live under common law.

[@Stuart_George]

Yeah, tell that to a woman who was raped. I guess the rapist could just say he didn't 'consent' to the Sexual Offences Act 2003, and he'd be let off. I think not.

[@palmer6933]

@@Stuart_George rape is a criminal offence

[@palmer6933]

Common law is very basic it only Intel's don't cause any harm to anyone or their property

[@Stuart_George]

@ Mr Messy I know. The original poster implied that Acts only come into force if one consents. I asked the original poster if he didn't 'consent' to the Sexual Offences Act, it would mean it wasn't in force, and therefore he could ignore it. It doesn't work like that in the real world.

[@Stuart_George]

See the Sexual Offences ACT 2003. Section 1. RAPE.

[@cypeman8037]

If your not happy with the outcome of the investigation please appeal, it does sometimes make a difference due to another officer investigating.

[@Stuart_George]

I will (depending on the outcome of course). However, as they were SO18 officers I suspect even a new investigating officer will still be from within SO18. I believe I can request that any conflicts of intrest that the investigating officer might have, be disclosed. I suspect the current COVID19 situation will be used as an excuse (rightly or wrongly) to drag things out, hoping I'll just lose interest in persuing the matter.

[@cypeman8037]

@@Stuart_George A letter of claim if you're not happy usually gets their attention.😁

[@Stuart_George]

Again, a course of action that I will consider in due course. I'll need to educate myself on the civil procedure rules first. I've only briefly studied them so far. Thanks for the advice, cype man. Appreciated.👍

[@The01t]

How much can you actually sue the Police for the section 43 stop and search and detainment? *No Freeman of the land £1Million an hour answers please*

[@Stuart_George]

I believe the 'accepted rate' (if there is such a thing!) Is about £200, more if the detention is lengthy. I think this is based on previous cases. I've not really looked into it, but did come across this figure somewhere, hence my words 'I believe' and 'I think'.!!!

[@palmer6933]

Look up the care bill act voted in a few days ago

[@Stuart_George]

Please provide a link, citation or evidence. I can find nothing called the Care Bill Act. The name makes no sense. When a Bill is passed, it becomes an Act. Would like some more info please.

[@palmer6933]

@@Stuart_George publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/58-01/0122/cbill_2019-20210122_en_1.htm?fbclid=IwAR3PfcM4q1-kYx3_x33EEwdUYe-_t5k9zQb6BV2Ujs_NVZA0DyW1BjR4NZg

[@Stuart_George]

Thanks, but this is the Coronavirus Bill, which has now been passed and become the Coronarivus Act. (Title is in top left). This is not the Care Bill Act, as you call it. Please can you point me to the section that talks about removing children from parents if the police feel or believe the parents are endangering them, as mentioned in the original post about this.

[@palmer6933]

@@Stuart_George well if you read that bill it says it in there mate

[@Stuart_George]

I will read it again.(The Coronavirus Act, not the Care Bill Act thing you originally were quoting). I was hoping you might help and point it out to me, as you are the one seeming to go along with the original statement. Is that to much to ask? I am presuming you have read it, and could point it out to me quite easily if you really wanted to.

[@alberttrouble272]

Its all about power and control....! Also when this is all over the laws will remain and you can bet will be abused by cops going forward.

[@hemedia7082]

It'll be good to get an insight into the powers they have, but if people knew that the first signs of the mild version of this virus are like death warmed up and given a choice, wouldn't want to move, never mind leave the house...

[@sparky150875]

Pap reports covered it very well

[@Stuart_George]

Yep, he does a good job. However that was just the Health Protection Regulations, not the Coronavirus Act powers.

[@sparky150875]

@@Stuart_George oh ok sorry 👍 Be good if you could do one then buddy.

[@matrix2126]

please do a video on potentially c19 infected people

[@Stuart_George]

That's 'potentially' everyone.!

[@mrichards55]

Potentially infectious person must cover every man and woman in Britain right?

[@Stuart_George]

Unless they are living on their own, and not going out, then yes, potentially.

[@t5jerry]

"best" auditor on youtube by a country mile.......but you wont get loads of like`s /comments because your NOT abusing security guards/police and your not going into public buildings/police stations holding your camera view on a document on the wall for a prolonged time waiting for a reaction from someone and then saying i can "film what i want" as i`m in public etc etc etc , so by being the best auditor, you wont`t be recognised as such, but i know you don`t do it for the reaction. 1 thing i DONT like about your video`s , there aint enuff of em !!!!!!!

[@Stuart_George]

Thank you t5jerry. I'm glad you notice and appreciate my approach.👍 I'll try and get more stuff out there, as my time allows.

[@Stuart_George]

Thanks GB. Appreciated.👍

[@FSAM2132]

@G B if some cretin reacts to an auditor exercising their rights, surely it's the cretin that's at fault??? How people react to you doing something that's completely legal/lawful isn't YOUR responsibility...it's THEIRS.!!

[@FSAM2132]

What about the power they've been given to take a child from their parent/guardian/responsible adult if they FEEL/BELIEVE that they have endangered that child by having them outside... ? That's by far the worst power they could have given them..just wait till some egomaniac plod tries to abuse THAT one...

[@Stuart_George]

Where is that power? Can you state the Act or Regulations and section that says that, as I'd like to look into it.

[@palmer6933]

@@Stuart_George the care bill act voted in 3 days ago

[@palmer6933]

That's nothing compared to what else is in there

[@Stuart_George]

I can find nothing called the Care Bill Act that was passed 3 days ago. Usually a Bill is passed, then becomes an Act, as far as my limited understanding goes, so even the name makes no sense. There are parts of the Coronavirus Act 2020 that do affect various Health Acts including the Care Act 2014, but so far no one can point me to the relevant section that the OP was refering to. I'm not saying it's not there, I just want someone to point me to the relevant section or schedules. So far, no one can.

[@Stuart_George]

Whatever gave you this idea? Take the child where? There is NOTHING in this Act, or the Health Protection Act that gives anyone powers to remove children from their parents. They can act if they have reasonable grounds that a child is potentialy infected AND may infect others, but they can't 'take' a child from their parent or guardian just because they feel/believe they are endangered by being outside.