Upgraded T-62 With 2xRelikt ERA VS M829 APFSDS

Upgraded T-62 With 2xRelikt ERA VS M829 APFSDS | Armour Piercing Simulation

Рет қаралды 21,526

4 ай бұрын

This simulation shows the impact of the 120mm M829 APFSDS with a Depleted Uranium penetrator being fired from a US M1A1 Abrams tank at a range of 1.9km, targeting the turret of an upgraded Russian T-62 tank with two layers of Relikt ERA.
Relikt is the 3rd generation of Russian ERA, and is claimed to be twice as effective as Kontakt-5. It can be installed on T-72B and T-90 tanks and was adopted in 2006.
Depending on incoming projectile angle, Relikt increases armor protection up to 700mm RHA for APFSDS ammo and up to 1100 mm for HEAT projectiles. Its structure with two plates of plastic explosive successfully defeats tandem HEAT charges at any angle.
Although the M829 is quite old, it is still impressive how two layers of Relikt can save a turret from the 60s.
► Patreon ✔ / simulationplus
► Twitter: ✔ / simulationplus

Пікірлер: 106

@batu_cagan 4 ай бұрын

That dual explosions didnt left much of a projectile. Very impressive

@VicariousReality7 4 ай бұрын

I read that in Project Farms voice

@Truck_Company_84 4 ай бұрын

Fellow Project Farm fans?!?? Very Impressive!

@TheAngriestGamer. 4 ай бұрын

this projectile has NOT been in use sense the 1980s. its the crappiest version with the worst pen. the M829A1 would pen this. and the M829A3 and A4 would probably exit the back of the target tank and look for another one just like it to kill.

@Kwisss 4 ай бұрын

@@TheAngriestGamer. I mean the penetration of it is still impressive but not up to modern standards. We all know its an old round.

@TheAngriestGamer. 4 ай бұрын

@@Kwisssalot of idiots think its the modern abrams round and that russian ERA ignores nato ammo... so no not everyone knows that. also this stuff only works at extreme angles. the side mounted stuff is junk and is only 1/3 as effective.

@mrcarroll8309 4 ай бұрын

That's honestly amazing that its possible to upgrade a tank of that age to be able to withstand an M1 round.

@lordlol3787 4 ай бұрын

At the same time, it is much cheaper and easier than making thick armor for a tank, and I’m sure replacing the Relic will be cheaper and easier than completely changing the armor plates

@NexIHateYT 4 ай бұрын

It's not m1, m1 has 105mm, It's m1a1 or m1a2

@democracy_enjoyer 4 ай бұрын

mate that relikt is just civilian grade rubber, also the m1 can easily just strike somewhere where the t62 doesn't have any relikt.

@NexIHateYT 4 ай бұрын

@@democracy_enjoyer >You say shit about Russian technologies. >Your nickname "democracy_enjoyer". >Your chanel created less than 2 years ago. >You praising western tanks. >Saying that M1 can take down T-62 in any other spot is like saying that T-80U can take down M60, so very stupid point. Your opinion is not valid.

@democracy_enjoyer 4 ай бұрын

@@NexIHateYT because russians stuff is shit just because my channel was made a year ago doesn't nullify my opinions why can't i have democracy enjoyer as my name? yes i am mate, the t62 has a ton of spots where it doesn't have two pieces of rubber strapped to it, the abrams can just shoot there. also the t62 will lose regardless because it's optics are shit and the abrams crew will see it way sooner than vise versa

@user-yc1xe1pd1f 4 ай бұрын

1 perhaps wouldn’t have saved it from penetration, but 2nd one didn’t leave any chance for APFSDS. Quite impressive how upgrades of old vehicles can give them decent protection against some relatively modern projectiles (They are placed hilariously weird on armor 😂)

@daliberista4344 4 ай бұрын

Stating the M829 sabot as a modern projectile is funny lol.

@user-yc1xe1pd1f 4 ай бұрын

@@daliberista4344 so “relatively” is a joke for you?

@Serbian-Templar 4 ай бұрын

Try putting 2 or 3 layers or more of this ERA on a soviet t34 and see how many you need to take in order to stop a 128mm german panzergranate, if it would be possible to simulate, thx.

@kwkfortythree39 4 ай бұрын

It would be very interesting, indeed!

@belgianfried 4 ай бұрын

Unlikely, full-calibre projectiles will need MUCH thicker flyer plates with higher sensitivity. I think yes it'd still fly right through

@Serbian-Templar 4 ай бұрын

@belgianfried only further testing will answer, but yeah,I still agree with you, because full ap is way sturdier than a spicy needle

@pro321pvp 4 ай бұрын

@@Serbian-Templar that's the best way to call a apfs round, thanks

@elongated_musket6353 4 ай бұрын

I want to see how full-bore solid shot, say 90, 100, or even 155mm, would fare against maybe a T-55 with ERA. It would be interesting to see how ERA would be able to affect such a heavy projectile that is less prone to shattering.

@user-xr5mj4fc7g 4 ай бұрын

Я хочу , чтобы вы смоделировали процесс, как поведёт себя броня Абрамса при попадании в неё в боеприпаса от миномёта "Тюльпан", калибр 240 мм.

@mmmyes9353 4 ай бұрын

that turret armor looks so accurate bro, like... im gonna cry looking at it

@evanbrown2594 4 ай бұрын

Great Work!

@grub__ 4 ай бұрын

Relikt all over OBJ-279's front plate vs DM53.

@grub__ 4 ай бұрын

And the round hitting the left side of the UFP.

@saint_alucardwarthunder759 4 ай бұрын

I want Obj.279 version with composite instead of homogeneous armor and crewless turret and tandem Relikt ERA (or Malakhit)

@democracy_enjoyer 4 ай бұрын

adding two plates of rubber won't increase protection against one of the best apfsds rounds

@rre9121 4 ай бұрын

Why is the delay on the second panel greater than the first?

@ukuskota4106 4 ай бұрын

Author, what do you think about the idea of testing spaced armor plates (like T-72B ) versus 1 rolled homogenous armor plate of the same thickness against HEAT ? Or how is the idea to simuulate explosion of ATGM (3 kilos of 8-gen which is equivavlent to 5kg tnt) near side plate of IFV (18mm steel of BMP-1 or alluminum of Bradley?

@Phantom-bh5ru 4 ай бұрын

Nice the era plate explodes at the right times now!

@Serbian-Templar 4 ай бұрын

Could you do the same with tiger 2 upper front plate and fire some apfsds at it

@SimulationPlus 4 ай бұрын

Great suggestion, I think it will be more interesting to test against an old AP shell.

@lombredeshakuras1481 4 ай бұрын

@@SimulationPlus APDS from the Leopard could be nice to see improvements in firepower for the main most armored vehicle between 15 years. Same for M26 and M60

@SimulationPlus 4 ай бұрын

Do you mean changing the propellant for instance?

@lombredeshakuras1481 4 ай бұрын

@@SimulationPlus I mean, using a DM13 at 1km on the Tiger 2's highest angle part of the UFP and using a M392 on the M26 UFP with the same settings. Both are the same round fired from the same cannon, it could be interesting to see how these WW2 vehicles would react to the first generation of AP of the 105mm as the HEAT would probably go through without much effort

@Truck_Company_84 4 ай бұрын

Okay M829a3 shell now!

@zeffy._440 4 ай бұрын

So why isn't this done in practice? Perhaps weight increases and also issues with crew and vehicle mobility as well as a larger target?

@Skravich 4 ай бұрын

Plsss do the Oplot E.R.A

@user-eh2vb7ng8y Ай бұрын

What program do you use for simulation?

@AlexRoivas 12 сағат бұрын

T62 is now the MBT of the world

@hooedude 20 күн бұрын

Russian tanks have a shorter range and only some have 2nd gen thermal. Abrams can effectively engage Russian tanks from ranges they can’t be hit back from as well.

@travismccraw6013 4 ай бұрын

T62 would never have relikt in the first place. Due to its suspension not being designed to add heavy ERA such as relikt. T62 was seen fitted with kontakt-1. The mounts on kontakt-1 and kontakt-5 was much different than the ones that hold relikt. Only tanks in active service that are fitted with relikt. Are T72b3m with relikt side skirts. T80bvm, T90ms, T90m. Also might i add it heavily depends on the angle that the sabot is coming in at. The Steeper it is yes relikt will effect it. But straight on relikt would have very little effect. Redeffect touched on this topic.

@levilastun829 4 ай бұрын

With the last modernization, T-62MV Obr. 2022 already reached 43 tones (maybe even 44) from the original 37 tones. So the limit for its suspension and road wheels design was reached and considering it was inherited from the T-54 and T-55, it's not surprising. In addition, the modifications required to upgrade it, would be too extensive and expensive to be worth it. But if it would ever be done (probably never will), it should look like the Object 167.

@travismccraw6013 4 ай бұрын

@@levilastun829 it won't be done. Why would russia even invest in putting relikt on a tank as old as t62? When they've already announced the start up with the t80 production. And are now ramping up the production of its T90m tanks. Another thing I found out. Is that T14 armata production has been stopped. And in this video it doesn't show relikt. It shows blocks. Relikt isn't big and bulky like that.

@robbob9273 4 ай бұрын

Relict words better at flat angles than you think, props for shouting out red effect though

@MarcinP2 2 ай бұрын

Just put 10 layers, I am sure the gearbox will survive it.

@vladimirnikolayev5029 4 ай бұрын

реликт уже давно рассматривается как защита от прошлого 😏

@user-et3eb7dy9w 4 ай бұрын

Дроны рулят

@Im_Mr_Unknown 4 ай бұрын

How about ukrainian explosive reactive armour "Nizh"

@ukuskota4106 4 ай бұрын

Do you want burn authors computer?

@Qer6168 4 ай бұрын

Nozh

@Im_Mr_Unknown 4 ай бұрын

@@Qer6168 it's Ukrainian armor, not russian, so it's "nizh" (or knife - English)

@ukuskota4106 4 ай бұрын

@@Im_Mr_Unknown oh, knife party?

@jPlanerv2 4 ай бұрын

Its more high tech than relict it would be harder to simulate since its design is completly different and consist of severall heat charges that cut afpsds rods in pieces on contact. Rip his PC in that case

@usmc5977 3 ай бұрын

Lmao there's no way a T-62 can resist Apfsds round on M1 A1 💀

@user-ej2wt4tj8o 4 ай бұрын

сможете ли вы смоделировать попадание HE 125мм от т72 в борт леопард 2а4? как я знаю, толщина нижней части бортов около 35мм не учитывая разного вида экранов.

@SilverShamrockNovelties 4 ай бұрын

All these simulations assume that the starving Russian soldiers didn’t steal and sell the explosive filler from their ERA blocks.

@ПрячущийсяХитрец 4 ай бұрын

я удивлён

@filipzietek5146 4 ай бұрын

Relikt is used on t-90m and t-80bvm, not on t-72b3.

@divinesan7786 4 ай бұрын

True but there was a T-72B2 which used Relikt

@filipzietek5146 4 ай бұрын

@@divinesan7786 true

@Kwisss 4 ай бұрын

Relikt is only used on the T-72B3 with its UBH upgrade adding Relikt bags to the side, filled the turret right side gap with Kontact-5 and an upgraded engine.

@hotlanta35 4 ай бұрын

T62?has good frontal armor to begin with

@robbob9273 4 ай бұрын

Nope 20 or 30mm more than a t54

@robbob9273 4 ай бұрын

Not counting the eyebrow kit

@igorshluker_9787 3 ай бұрын

Очень смешно, как эта фигня вообще не учитывает кинетическую энергию. М 829 даже не заметит эти преграды. Точнее он не деформируется так сильно благодаря громадной скорости прохождения. А уж дырявую башню 62 он даже не заметит на своем пути. Прекрасно это показывают реальные бои, где даже старые снаряды Т 72 вскрывают такие же Т 72, но уже с новыми системами защиты. Даже в башни.