US F-35 Showing Its Insane Capability During Vertical Take-Off

[@Darth1Marik]

Hey there former Navy sailor here CTR2(IDW/SW) and at the start of the video they mention the F-35 is capable of aircraft carrier operations but that ship shown is the USS Bonhomme Richard LHD-6 a Wasp class Amphibious Assault ship. The Wasp class was a design evolution from older traditional carriers and heli carriers so it's often mistaken for conventional fixed-wing aircraft carriers. The LHD stands for Landing Helicopter Deck. Typically they carry the MV-22 Osprey, AV-8B Harrier II, AH-1 Cobras and some CH-53 Sea Stallions. There are others but these are the most common on the flight deck. The LHD ships are basically a mobile landing strip for Marine aircraft but also have a number of sea to shore small craft like the LCAC, LCU and LCM. Sometime in the mid 2010's they started playing around with the F-35 being able to launch off the LHD platform but there was alot of issues early on. I've been out now for over 6 years so I'm not entirely informed on the current status of it but I would imagine they've made some headway. Also for those even further curious enough in July of 2020 the Bonhomme Richard was heavily damaged by a massive chemical fire and the repairs were estimated to be about over 3 billion dollars and would take several years to complete. The Wasp Class I believe is only valued around 1 billion to construct and so the decision was made that she be decommissioned and sold for scrap.

[@seanlavelle103]

I can't imagine how amazing it must b to see your own name on the side of the cockpit on this awesome piece of machinery

[@goldorak3251]

..you mean piece of shit ?..This anvil is a technological disaster.

[@goldorak3251]

@@381delirius Open your mind and investigate.

[@manenwan]

@@goldorak3251 build something better then

[@foskeleven11]

@@381delirius Don't you love it when you ask a simple question you're told to find the answer yourself when THEY were the one who brought it up? It's almost as if they don't know the answer themselves because they're just repeating the same diatribe they read on the internet... lol

[@goldorak3251]

@@Beggzy2667 "The F-35 program has been dysfunctional across two decades. In some cases, the jet is a failure, though more time (and money) will probably fix most of the issues." (US Congressman, March 2021)

[@cullensaquarium]

What an amazing piece of engineering. The materials look so advanced

[@trippa3553]

Over engineered

[@slightlyirradiatedmuffin3257]

@@trippa3553 Not exactly a choice when you need to be: -Stealthy -Capable of carrying sufficient weapons loads -decent range -have the most powerful radar on a fighter in history -capable of STOVL -still be reasonably fast and maneuverable -most advanced sensor suite in aviation history -have incredible data-linking capability All at the same time

[@trippa3553]

@@slightlyirradiatedmuffin3257 that just means it’s over engineered as fuck

[@trippa3553]

@@slightlyirradiatedmuffin3257 also it’s expensive as shiiiiiit

[@slightlyirradiatedmuffin3257]

@@trippa3553 1. It is not expensive. It is the same cost adjusted for inflation as the F-16 despite being substantially more sophisticated _even_ _relative_ to the technology of the time. And it is selling the same number of exports relative to domestic procurement so the financial profile is nearly identical. 2. Over engineered means overly complicated _relative_ to the demands the equipment must meet. The demands themselves are also entirely valid and based on real gained experience and expertise of people who understand modern Air Power far better than you or I do.

[@adam999adami9]

دارن آماده میشن برای حمله به تهران 1401/4/14

[@ericlozen9631]

I worked on the F-14 Tomcat & the F/A-18C Hornet while in the U.S. Navy. Served on CV-43, CV-60, & CVN-71 as well.

[@MikoMuru]

Really?! Even the harrier could do vtol. What besides stealth actually blows your mind? And even then we had the f117 nighthawk that was very stealthy. The F35 has awful power to weight ratio. Even an f16 could beat it in a merge. I think america has went one step foward and two steps backwards. The f14 tomcat at least had the aim54 phoenixes that outrange modern amraams. Our country is in desperate need of a LRM for air to air engagements.

[@ericlozen9631]

@@MikoMuru You're absolutely correct and I'm not going to debate this. 🇺🇸

[@comfortablynumb9342]

Thanks for serving!

[@ericlozen9631]

@@comfortablynumb9342 Thank You Very Much

[@comfortablynumb9342]

@@ericlozen9631 you're welcome. My family served from the revolutionary war to Vietnam, all the wars. The military wouldn't have me because of my eyes. So I respect and appreciate all who serve.

[@liamcalpine]

So you could essentially land this thing on a helipad. Making you the coolest fucken CEO in the world.

[@nickh5081]

In theory, yes. However, the heat coming off the exhaust and blasted straight down on final approach is pretty insane, so you better make sure your helipad and the building under it is properly rated and prepared!

[@justindunlap1235]

It would in theory be the quickest way to get from an office in New York to one in Chicago. You'd have speed and style if not comfort.

[@thomasyunick3726]

You could land .....but not take back off

[@randomentertainingvideos3545]

@@thomasyunick3726 Why not?

[@thomasyunick3726]

@@randomentertainingvideos3545 not a VTOL ...

[@ppp7080]

Great America! Always thanks from Korea.

[@jeffgrigsby7396]

Long ago I worked on Avionics on the Harrier.1983-...... Wow what an improvement !

[@oreosmith2862]

In a galaxy far far away

[@jerryumfress9030]

The Globe master is the plane that makes it possible for everything else in the USA inventory to happen

[@airmanma]

C-5 IS ACTUALLY BETTER.

[@jamesstewart3000]

F yeah! I like the service ceiling, it makes it very multi-purpose for the B series applications

[@arnaldomattioli8282]

Bach cantate

[@baribari7792]

Nonononono

[@baribari7792]

@@arnaldomattioli8282 noonno

[@baribari7792]

No

[@baribari7792]

No

[@denistru8364]

Really amazing landing. I believe your pilots park the jets on their lawns after work. Greetings from Russia.

[@gungec8510]

I think they are happy because it can finally land

[@user-cv8xu2yk7m]

XD the pilots be Parkin the Lightning’s on the roofs and cars

[@ThatSB]

@@sttc1007 because they have a plane that crashes half the time?

[@gsander3102]

Pretty sure you Russians use Missiles as Clothesline and mount it to your jets in the garage before going to work . Am I right in saying in that?

[@JamesJoyce12]

russia is a third world dictatorship no different than the failed sates in africa - enjoy your dictator for life

[@brussell639]

3:16 the length of the F35 B is 50.5' and the wingspan is 35'. The F35 C is only .3" longer. It's wingspan, at 43', is what really makes the size difference. This video is just sloppy.

[@transfertus]

a flying brick ! what a waste of money and energy !

[@sethjansson5652]

@@transfertus You're quite the expert in engineering aren't you...

[@transfertus]

@@sethjansson5652 That 'thing' does not even deserve to be called a plane. It is the worst ever nightmare of all the aviation history

[@paulbedichek2679]

When do we get F-35 C operational on American Carriers?

[@transfertus]

@@paulbedichek2679 F35 has never been operational and will never be. Showbiz only. Flying brick

[@maryrafuse3851]

Every time I see this version of the F-35 I think of the vets of the Pacific War, how much carrier pilots would have appreciated this talented aircraft. F-35 debunkers are being proven wrong every day of the year. Its eventual full development will be even more amazing.

[@shannonbrown9273]

It’s a single engine ac. It will get shredded. It’s just a replacement for the harrier. That’s why they’re retrofitting the raptor. Soon a new twin engine will replace the C type.

[@johnsmith-ro2tw]

Honestly, look at the specs of Russian sukhoi 35, it's truly another category. Or even compare it to the French Rafale. It's much better. There are reports they picked the wrong outer material for F35, the plane collects rust. If they couldn't get this simple part right, it says a lot about the overall performance of the plane. The vertical landings look cool and all, but if planes from other countries are 100 years ahead in terms of performance, we could say it's shit.

[@spaghettiman2.052]

@@johnsmith-ro2tw Where did you hear those reports from? i would like to know

[@dumdumbinks274]

@@johnsmith-ro2tw If you think others are 100 years ahead in performance, then you simply don't understand the performance values. F-16s are still a challenge for the aircraft you mention, and the F-35 completely outclasses the F-16.

[@johnsmith-ro2tw]

@@spaghettiman2.052 it was in the press a few weeks ago, there were photos too. not even talking about the few cases of F35 planes that flew straight into water after taking off. Unless these planes have a secret submarine mode. Way to trick the Russians.

[@CyrusEpion]

I was stoked to see the F-35 B and C references..... But.. Am I the only one scared when they showed the new medical quarantine containment system? The military usually plans for every possible scenario. But seeing that and thinking about a future war... I don't think I want to imagine what could happen in the future.

[@this-is-bioman]

There's not a single vertical take off in this movie :-/

[@Adam-zo6lc]

I was looking for it to hover then take off, it can do it! I found it in a video (f-35 vs av-8b) USA owns the av-8b was giving to friendly Spanish and Italian Navy

[@willymac5036]

The WIDTH of the F-35B is 35 feet, much shorter than the WIDTH of the F-35C, which is 43 feet. All 3 variants of the F-35 have a LENGTH of 51 feet.

[@arthuranthony3341]

N .. Op

[@geraltofrivia3344]

30 year old man here. If I hadn’t ended up in the career I’m in now which I really enjoy, it has always been a dream of mine to be a jet, specifically a fighter jet pilot in the Air Force. Every now and then (maybe a couple times a year) I go on these long rabbit holes where I look up a bunch of videos but this one is awesome idk I had no clue we had jets capable of vertical take offs and landings. It’s so insane to me.

[@elmo-nu2qm]

There was vtol jets for a long time

[@ricorodriguez2761]

its a dogs life Geralt, i'll tell you that much.

[@potaninification]

I don’t think you could ever be a jet. Perhaps a pilot.

[@geraltofrivia3344]

@@potaninification I get you jest but the comma was necessary to facilitate and differentiate between a jet pilot and a fighter jet pilot of which I wanted to be the ladder.

[@mha2352]

Not much has happened between Roach and the F-35 then. Roach also does vertical langdings when you call her :D

[@MrKredski]

Hang on. What do you mean by "Honeywell Carbenix Brake located behind the cockpit"? Aren't Honeywell Carbenix wheel-brakes?

[@synjdcrispy7843]

Not the first mistake they've made on these videos. I think he was referring to the door to the intake for the lift fan. While something like that would definitely slow you down, I'm sure they already have to be going fairly slow before opening it so it doesn't get ripped off.

[@SweetSurferX1985]

F35 has diving ability. We saw it on Southern coast of China.

[@Night_Bandit]

You win best comment 🥇 lmaooo

[@lesterbeedell9725]

I seem to remember that the Sea Harrier achieved that quite a while back and at a fraction of the cost?

[@nisa_rouge]

it's not just about the vtol

[@lesterbeedell9725]

@@nisa_rouge really! And the F35 is so expensive that it’ll never be risked in combat and and any pilot in the FAA could convert to the Harrier very easily also the RR Pegasus was an engineering marvel because to overcome the potential problems with gyroscopic couples half the engine rotated one way and they other half the other, the nozzles were so simple….. and most importantly it was proven in combat

[@enjoylife8590]

Corrupt Military industrial complex… the higher the cost the happier the oligarchs are… poor taxpayers enriching the 1% of Americans…

[@TheSemiArtisticPuma]

@@lesterbeedell9725 it was expensive to develop but with the production (having hundreds made already) its one of the cheapest planes to buy, at about the same price to operate daily as a F-18 and it clocks 78mil, which is about 20mil under most of its competitors.

[@lesterbeedell9725]

@@TheSemiArtisticPuma so expensive that it will never be placed in harms way!

[@ryanbuckley5529]

I saw one flying around my town a month ago, damn thing was Quiet! Very beautiful plane! 🙏🏼🇺🇸🙏🏼

[@wildcoyote34]

i would love getting a chance to see an F35 up close ,,I live near offutt AFB by bellevue nebraska ,, i'm on the iowa side and i get to see all manner of aircraft flying in and out ,,i've seen the new KC46 Pegasus and numerous B2 B1 and B52 bombers ,,regularly see FA18s and last summer i got some good photos of the B29s DOC and FIFI flying in formation with a P51 and i think i have seen every version of the boeing 707 the airforce flies ,,C17 and C5 galaxys are regular sights too

[@RickOAA]

We had them hovering around near NAS Jax a few years ago. Very cool.

[@76133rconner]

They Build them about 6 miles from my home if Fort Worth Tx. I see them test flight new ones daily. Ain't shit quiet about it.

[@wildcoyote34]

@ОСЬМИНОГ - ШОУ funny i have yet to see anything russian aircraft wise with 2 exceptions that was worth a damn ,,the TU4 which was a direct copy of the B29 and the TU-95 that's still in service today which is the fastest propeller powered aircraft in the world I've seen a lot of people say russian aircraft are better than anyone else's question i have is why if they are so great does nobody else besides russia fly them ,,,and another question on the same line if they are so much cheaper why do they buy american or european made planes instead ,,only plane the USA never sold was the F-22 ,,we keep building new stuff but are still flying dinosaurs like the B-52 the newest of them are 60 years old

[@RickOAA]

Russian aircraft are 2x better than what? They have no answer to this aircraft or the F-22.

[@TheAvenstar]

...and the "insane vertical capability and takeoff" was where?

[@g8Words]

Nicknamed "the flying brick" ;-)

[@Yikeo]

Yes let me ignore the Fighter Jet directly in front of me that is landing vertically

[@Relayer6a]

@@Yikeo What part of "take off" don't you understand. A plane capable of vertical take off (not landing) would be incredible.

[@kilik407]

@@Relayer6a The F-35 B is actually capable to take off vertically. There are videos on yt about it. Maybe they don‘t use it because it costs to much fuel, especially when loaded with weapons. The Yak-141 (was never in service) & the Harrier also had this ability.

[@jamesevans938]

@@kilik407 vertical take off is a capability only used for when it there isn't enough room for short take off but they need to reposition the aircraft and taxiing isn't a option

[@fatfreddyfatfreddy6240]

Quelle capacité insensée à décoller verticalement .... pour un avion conçu pour décoller verticalement :) Prochaine vidéo : Quelle capacité insensée à voler...pour un avion :)

[@flyboy38a]

That is an interesting picture that you show of the F-35 taking off from the deck of the ship. Just where did the landing gear go to?????? NO pilot would be stupid enough to ever bring their gear up that close to the deck since ships pitch up and down as much as 30 feet in some cases.

[@dedexyz8475]

PHOTOSHOP

[@Tsamokie]

ever bring his* gear

[@derteufel7981]

Do you think it was a real photo?

[@flyboy38a]

@@derteufel7981 No, I think it was photoshopped. I have several hundred launch and recoveries aboard an aircraft carrier under my belt as well as time as an LSO and I can say there is no way that any sane pilot would have put their aircraft in that position and still expected to keep their wings. Also the landing gear would not have had enough time to retract into the plane at its position in the photo.

[@tposeuntilww3153]

Actually it was real I was aboard the ship when the LT pulled this off. the whole deck was in awe at the sheer skill displayed by the pilot

[@tonyrandall5758]

That was very good content... P.S. That's a Big ass plane and the F-35 is sick!!! Peace.

[@brussell639]

I'm fairly certain the creator of this video has no idea what honeywell carbenix brakes are. I'm pretty sure the lift fan door is not the friction brakes that honeywell makes. It's air brake, alright, but that's entirely different.

[@jstephenallington8431]

It's an air intake, but I'm guessing that it can be used as an air brake as well. maybe? (the video shows the door opening on take-off, not being used as a brake at all, and it is clearly marked "Danger Fan intake Danger") Also, the vapor "cone" that is seen around the aircraft is present during high angle of attack maneuvers, and is caused by the air first COMPRESSING then decompressing as it is flowing around the aircraft.

[@ethanbrandt1827]

I too was wondering why they would use a brake on takeoff?? I don’t understand the system but the videos explanation was hella confusing

[@ivanlagrossemoule]

@@jstephenallington8431 It's the door to the intake, the original design didn't even have it that way, but two side doors instead. It's open on takeoff because the lift-fan is running. The idea is that since it goes really slow, the wings don't produce enough lift, so the fan adds what's needed to take-off. This is what allows the short take-off.

[@ZetarFox]

Now imagine having some of those Greek pilots flying this beauties☝️

[@ar568]

Greece cannot afford one 😂

[@ZetarFox]

@@ar568 Among 24 Rafales they are getting already that are capable of carrying Nuclear woapons, they are also getting F-35's Stop leaving in the past and get informed 1st👍

[@da_poopoo_dealer3152]

@@ZetarFox dont get emotional, accept the fact that it would be almost impossible for greece to afford an effective fleet of these without cutting the effectiveness of other capabilities. Greece just cannot afford it, and by the time they can, they will be obsolete

[@metolse475]

@@da_poopoo_dealer3152 The F-35 won’t be becoming outdated anytime soon.

[@ilonaocache3458]

Бесподобный ролик!Красота!🇷🇺

[@маКСИму-д7п]

😅💩

[@Pedro-hq5pt]

Haha 2022 showing the amazing submarine capabilities of f35

[@kevinlee6003]

It's below avg in crashes compared to other Jets.

[@rowmagnvs]

Are you feeling salty?

[@benzene_sandwich]

Putting the ‘Multi Role’ in multi role fighter

[@fidodido664]

Seat ejection is not necessary 🤣

[@KlausM]

2:08 It can travel 1,200 nm. 1200 nanometer is not a whole lot (1.2 micrometer). However, reaching Mach 1.6 within this distance is quite some acceleration:)

[@theaeroflyexperience2233]

nautical miles

[@KlausM]

@@theaeroflyexperience2233 OK. Thanks

[@Skank_and_Gutterboy]

And I guarantee that Mach 1.6 is seriously low-balled. That thing is faster than an F-16.

[@yombinome1174]

@@Skank_and_Gutterboy Especially when the F-16 is at stop on the airport.

[@iAmDislikingEveryShort]

I get the joke

[@denisjardin8168]

cuando era joven pude ver un Harrier en vivo y directo y la verdad que la ingeniería puesta en estos vehículos es impresionante

[@leelydston1225]

My Company designed and built these despite the disagreements between the Army, Navy, and Airforce. It's kinda like designing the perfect commuter car based upon input from every commuter in the Country! Will it go fast when needed yet still get affordable gas mileage? Will the emissions meet government standards? Will it handle racecar as well as grocery getting capabilities? Will it be maneuverable in a parking lot? What colors would you like? Automatic or 6 speed? 4 cylinder, 6 cylinder, 8 cylinder or 12 cylinder? Will it have BlueTooth Capability and/or concert status audio? Will it be affordable and desirable to all economic classes? What will the Warranty period be? It was a tough battle but eventually something came of it! The thing of it is, in our supposedly conscientiously fiscal responsibilities and RFP Government environment where lowest bidder wins the prize, I'm surprised that anything was accomplished! Imagine if you will, you respond to a Request for Proposal and your approved bid is $25m per plane yet each of the different services want's something which none of the other services need or want which brings the cost of the plane to over $30m? (And you wonder why there are $650 hammers?) Believe it or not, ALL of these various inputs dictate the success or failure of a specific design. Many have failed but this one was a success.

[@problemchild1976]

Your company (assuming you work for Lockheed Martin) had a hell of a lot of help internationally. Eg who had the skills to design and build the shaft driven lift fan?!?

[@sk8ingonfire]

1/18th mpg on nitromethane what’s the purpose of that

[@problemchild1976]

@@sk8ingonfire ???

[@simonbaxter8001]

That front lift fan and it's doors are a lot of moving parts and complexity compared to the Harrier! Wonder how well it would survive battle damage.

[@SkinPeeleR]

Not.....

[@random-b-i2480]

@@SkinPeeleR lmao

[@rooiflitz]

The thing is it wouldn't get damaged. An F-35s purpose is to stay as far away from the battle as possible because that's where it operates the best. Its primary role is BVR engagements, if an invasion were to happen the F-35s role would be to destroy air targets first then once it doesnt need to worry so much about stealth aspects it can carry bomb loads. If an F-35 gets battle damage than the F-35 failed its primary mission.

[@owenboswell2613]

exactly. so many people don't understand this and think f35 is a piece of junk

[@johnmoorhousedecorated-nam899]

Its time to rethink our services (Army, Marines, Navy, Air Force), The need was different back in the 40's. Time to revamp our services. With the NAVY we can be anywhere anytime. The Airforce needs treaties with other nations to land. Army/Marines ?

[@wizzotizzo]

What?

[@m_swizzy22]

What exactly you trying to say? 😂 the USAF has got bases and recruitment stations all over the world at this point, they have their own aircraft stationed in the UK, Italy and South Korea, also Poland and other European countries. The Air Force literally owns earths orbit at this point with the GPS satellite network. The USAF, USMC, and US Army do not care about 80 years ago, back then was different fighting, not like today where you take s BVRM like the Meteor and snipe a MiG-29S from 60 miles and he can’t do anything about it because the missile ignores flare or chaff, the Russian R-70 is literally useless compared to the Meteor, the guidance system is terrible. So now tell me how the Soviet aircraft feel when they know something like an F-22 or F-35 is in their vicinity. They don’t even get notified that a missile has been launched at them until too late, due to the advanced guidance the modern AAMs have from the US

[@be4unvme]

@@m_swizzy22 he says get the bases out because we have aircraft carriers

[@jojythomas9432]

Ek🇬🇦🇮🇨🇬🇳🇬🇺🇦🇮🇮🇨

[@Ardie321]

One of many problems with relying on just the Navy getting anywhere anytime- bombers can’t take off, land or fit on carriers…

[@mikeday62]

The F-35 is a wicked toad looking high-tech animal.

[@RickOAA]

There is beauty in the purposeful nature of its shape.

[@timtec3000]

Outclassed and outmanoeuvred by a F16. Some amazing plane this is. Even a Mig21 can out turn it. This isn't a fucking video game.

[@paulthomson9014]

It's trying to an old RAF harrier .

[@KingMaverick07]

I just love this machine 😍 it's so beautiful and just awesome! F-35

[@CorgiLife10]

4:00 you telling me this stealth aircraft can hide in it's own cloud? 0-0

[@billwebber5208]

The UK is currently testing an aircraft that cannot be seen on the ground by eyesight or radar at all. Some kind of adaptive camouflage that works extremely well.

[@jojototo4566]

At 8:00 you can see how F35s are made ... You can see two large planes copulating ...9 months later a tiny F35 will be born

[@spitfirelast8761]

The maintenance is probably a whole library of encyclopedias.

[@johnanthonyp]

It appears they're slowly revealing themselves-gently

[@nickmazz9345]

Yeah very gently it can't even do things the harrier could do originally having to drop its expensive bomb load into the ocean before landing until the RAF came up with a make do fix. I hope the rumors are true and the UK are cutting the order utterly useless over hyped way too expensive plane. The UK should invest in its own aerospace technology not propping up someone else's.

[@interman7715]

@@nickmazz9345 Absolutely, the biggest pile of overpriced horse shit that the military industrial complex could ever make.

[@birgerkagan6087]

@@interman7715 You and Nick Mazz seem to know a lot about fighter jets and in particular 5. generation Air War Doctrine? which fighters have you flown?

[@mikewhipkey6863]

I would be willing to bet that this entire program (F-35) is just a decoy and cover for what they are developing to replace the F-22 Raptor which would explain the unfathomable cost of this aircraft which in my opinion is a solid option to go against most other available fighters/bombers but is outrageously more expensive than it should be...

[@birgerkagan6087]

@@mikewhipkey6863 Ohh I love reading all these utterly crazy theories. A "decoy" that in several units around the world already have been declared "operational" which = combat ready. Also the fact is that the unit cost is less than the alternatives i.e. Eurofighter and the Gripen (none of whom are 5.generation fighters)

[@MidnightmoonRR]

Gotta love the Production model of the Yak-141

[@brandonclark435]

You mean the one with the 3 point swiveling pipe from Convair?

[@MidnightmoonRR]

@@brandonclark435 the...200A I believe? Yeah it laid the groundwork. But because the Yak-141 was actually built and tested (Funded by Lockheed might I add), I kinda consider the F-35B to be descended from the Yakovlev design rather than Convair. But that is a Good point!

[@brandonclark435]

@@MidnightmoonRR If you go look at the idea that spawned the 200A, the F35 family has more in common with that than the Yak. The Yak was just a Testbed

[@AA-xo9uw]

@@MidnightmoonRR "But because the Yak-141 was actually built and tested (Funded by Lockheed might I add)" Lockheed paid Yak for flight test data they didn't fund the original 41s. As part of the deal Yak was supposed to build additional aircraft but it remains uncertain as to whether or not that ever occurred. By the way, Pratt & Whitney patented and built a swiveling nozzle back in the 60s, long before the thieves at Yak copied their work.

[@G_de_Coligny]

They didn't show the F35 biggest achievement... Triggering the need to restart the F15 production lines... At least withe A10 warthog things are done because of the plane own merit...

[@KamikazeChinaman]

Underrated comment.

[@charleslacombe359]

The 35's biggest achievement is vertical take off ! Other than that it's Biggest achievement is the most expensive project !

[@G_de_Coligny]

@@charleslacombe359 time ---might---- tell, but I'm really not convinced about the need for jump jets. At first it was cold war delirium for makeshift improvised airfields Now it's about making helicopter carrier pretend to be aircrafts carrier. Because nobody want to give proper funding to the USMC to put catapult on their amphibious assault ships. Feels like if someone heard about shared plateform for cars, and decided to do the same for planes, but without understanding really well how it was done... look like more time was spend making the planes look the same rather than focusing on their needed specific tasks. ALSO: I gave the example for the F15 for the USAF. But the same is done by the USNA focusing on their Super Hornet. A plane that I felt was like a discount F14 back in the days but who proved to be fit for any job you threw at him. Add this to the energy some wasted to try to get rid of the A10 who now also seemed to be scheduled to return into production in an improved form and you get a really bizarre picture of how things are being done in the american army these days.

[@FelixIsMyName]

@@G_de_Coligny As a Brit, we have used VTOL in the Royal Navy since the early 80's, so the F35B makes sense. Our nation looked at getting the C version, as HMS Queen Elizabeth and Prince of Wales are designed to be Cat and Trap in the future during a major refit, but outside of Royal Navy use, the B offers to give that flexibility the Harrier offered. Remember if Russia struck, we only have around 4-15 minuets until our airbases would be hit.

[@G_de_Coligny]

@@FelixIsMyName yes, instead of showing off with 2 towers you should have put a cat on these boats...

[@alexnet8943]

Ребята, спасибо за грузы которые Вы присылаете в Украину❗🇺🇲🇺🇦🤝

[@atmacm]

I didn’t see a single vertical takeoff....

[@techmarine83]

Because these videos are BS propaganda pieces.

[@rawnut77]

It take-off only on a short distance and without a catapult. It's not a really vertical take-off but almost.

[@Moon-no3ts]

vertical landing is not practical in combat situation it take more time than conventional landing which still take less time but it also depend on pilot skill but personally i think it unnecessary it increase maintenance cost and production cost 1. fighter need more stealth 2.less maintenance time and cost 3.need more toughness on bad weather and other climate condition need 4.very good radar 5.less production cost it can be higher if figher does have very low maintenance cost 6.have various armament choose then thats a good fighter but most 5th gen lack 2,3,5 those are one of key feature to keep a fighter operational but 6th gen will have that now most military realised that and about stealth it only work for year so then new radar design comes and stealth don't work but it still debatable because there no field use of stealth fight so its hard to tell

[@blisteringstars]

its not VTOL, its a STOVAL

[@atmacm]

It’s STOVL, but I know what you mean.

[@larryshamlin7573]

That was cool takeoff in the rain,steam clean the flight deck.😍🤩🤓

[@sarcasmo57]

It is neato.

[@upsilonnolispu6958]

1:42 Not sure that hitchhiking will be successful here

[@pepperoni4307]

lmao

[@zthekhan11]

LMAOOOOOO nice one 😂

[@thecurrentmoment]

wow, it can travel up to 1,200 nanometers (nm). Amazing

[@Medicine91]

Nautical miles

[@seanpatrick78]

@@Medicine91 NM = nautical miles, nm = nanometers

[@DinoNucci]

Is the cockpit glass coatings just peeling off the glass¿!!? 2:22

[@stevehislop]

LOL, yes, because the whole jet is only made to make the MICC rich and not to be worth shit. It´s the biggest turd in the history of flight.

[@DinoNucci]

@@stevehislop 😳😲💩

[@rawnut77]

Amazing F35, but the price too.

[@leneanderthalien]

except for the Swiss: the US take a dumping and sell they F35 at much deeper price even as the F18 super hornet= US tax payer will pay for the Swiss airforce...was only a US manouver to prevent the Swiss buy Dassault Rafale...same thing will happens in Canada...

[@nunyabizness1708]

Sure, but just wait until the fluxor valve gives out.

[@antoniomartindepaularodrig3457]

I would like your country to use this enormous motivation and knowledge to build peace and harmony between all countries in the world. Unfortunately, man still needs war to develop. I must say that although I do not agree with many things that I see about the USA, I cannot help admiring your country and failing to recognize that it would be much worse if another country occupied this place of yours as a superpower.

[@cambo1200]

Yes, it could be worse. We could all be speaking German right now.

[@antoniomartindepaularodrig3457]

Não o conheço, mas gostaria de deixar um abraço fraterno, esperando não ter ferido suscetibilidades.

[@antoniomartindepaularodrig3457]

I don't know him, but I would like to leave a fraternal hug, hoping I didn't hurt my feelings.

[@antoniomartindepaularodrig3457]

Don't forget that the translations of our languages are by no means done with the clarity that the terms demand. Some things just don't have translations. So disregard impertinences.

[@antoniomartindepaularodrig3457]

Não se esqueça que as traduções de nossos idiomas nem de longe são feitas com a clareza que os termos exigem. Algumas coisas simplesmente não tem traduções. Por isso desconsidere as impertinências.

[@haraldkenewein7955]

There's an increasing lack of knowledge about the meaning of vertical.

[@blardymunggas6884]

Its good for air lifting defeated US army for an evacuation mission. 🤣🤣

[@threathy]

Ok flight expert.

[@threathy]

@@blardymunggas6884 its good to 💣 your house lol. 😂

[@blardymunggas6884]

@@threathy

[@threathy]

@@blardymunggas6884 nice propaganda but ok. This is not real picture tho. 😂

[@Владимир-ш4г8ь]

И что он продемонстрировал? Советские самолёты это умели ещё в 70-е годы.

[@ИванКолчев-т2ю]

Наши Яки с вертикальным взлётом

[@americanknow8232]

The insane capability to dive into water from the run way. It can also dive into the water from the sky somewhere near Japan. Insane.

[@516Mel]

Russian troll bot spotted

[@americanknow8232]

@@516Mel Where?

[@sotabaka]

theres no russian/socviet test pilots alive ... they all die during the initial tests ...

[@americanknow8232]

@@sotabaka Or, right. F-35 can also dive into the sea from British carriers, too.

[@jean_sebastien]

And now let's talk about the range, speed, stealth and why not max speed issue.

[@E_h2]

Wow, that's super cool!

[@thedude4632]

Stop the stupid music!

[@E_h2]

@@thedude4632 don't say bad things only your mouth gets worse and i'm korean

[@Mandy-vn7rl]

3:38 make that 139 units per year, I’d love to own one of these awesome jet planes 👍🏻 please Santa 🎅 please !

[@tanagra2]

I would like to buy you one, but apparently you could buy a light aircraft for the cost of the glass canopy alone on the F 35.

[@bhopboy2165]

@@tanagra2 holy ****

[@Mandy-vn7rl]

Does it come in pink 😂 😂 ?

[@cenccenc946]

They better work as advertised, because they will never be able to turn them out like spit fires, mustangs, etc in wwll. Once you loose your existing fleet, there are no replacement anytime soon.

[@rdehaan7621]

This is legit so weird cuz I was literally thinking the same exact thing. I want for Xmas

[@QuietStormX]

Always showing the largest and most expensive F-35C models? 👎

[@markturner4219]

All 35B models in this video.

[@chrispigott6913]

It seems to be a vertical landing and short take off aircraft only when carrying weapons etc ...

[@jurajsintaj6644]

I wouldn't say better, but they are much cheaper

[@k99875]

That's it for today..... Sound makes me pretty much good.

[@seungjunglee4031]

03:25

[@BrianSu]

F-35B can't take off vertically. It's a STOVL aircraft.

[@royal_throck2983]

except they can, and do...

[@bc1969214]

it can takeoff vertically but wouldn't have much of a combat load which isn't a big deal since fully loaded it can takeoff in less than 550 feet.

[@AA-xo9uw]

"F-35B can't take off vertically" Incorrect. By the way, there was no vertical takeoff KPP for the JSF.

[@BrianSu]

@@AA-xo9uw yeah I've just learned it can w/o weapons loaded

[@puffin51]

Does anyone know what the F-35B's payload limit is for unassisted short take-off, and for slow rolling landing, such as for carrier-borne operations?

[@orlock20]

Aircraft that require STOL or use "ski jumps" have a lighter payload than from a long runway.

[@puffin51]

@@orlock20 I know that. What I can't find is the practical payload - that means, ordnance plus fuel - of the F-35B for STOL operations from the QE class carriers. See, it is unlikely that a QE's air group could establish total air superiority over even a moderate land-based air force. That would imply that all operations would have to remain stealthy, which in turn means internal loads only. So what, in practical terms, can an F-35B carry to target? How far, given that the F-35B would be _avoiding_ threats from an air defence network? What it carries, how far, is the main measure of how useful a strike aircraft it is.

[@puffin51]

@@hermanmusimbi4337 Thank you. That answers the question very well. That would be two AM-RAAM 120's, I suppose, the long-range variant? And the 450 nm relates to a high-to-low straight line approach with no use of afterburner?

[@TheSemiArtisticPuma]

the exacts are probably still classified so the best any of us can do it just guess tbh

[@puffin51]

@@TheSemiArtisticPuma Yes. I wonder why the positive aspects of the F-35B's performance - its stealth capacity or its networking ability, for example - are so widely touted, but enquiries about its real availability, sortie rate, or payload under actual operational conditions are met with silence.

[@Петрович-э7ъ]

Хорошо - хорошо! Ф - 35 - " Самый Лучший в Мире Аэроплан".. Осталось выяснить кому он угрожает? Скорее всего самим США!

[@alexneponimax8540]

Самый лучший это f22 и су57. Но свой американцы не продают никому. Они разные по параметрам, но достойны друг друга. Ф ка по малозаметности, радио электронной борьбе и вооружение су шка по маневренности и тяге. Как известно кто первый обнаружит на радаре, тот и победил.

[@frai7770]

Так что там было безумного?

[@VitArkh]

Это же Ф-35, как вы не понимаете. Это же Ф-35, это крышеснос. Это же Ф-35, а не СУ-57. Ну в общем линию партии вы поняли, продолжать самим.

[@СергийСахник-ь4ь]

@@VitArkh не равняй пепелац су 57 с ф 35 которых уже больше 600 штук

[@ЭдуардКуприенко-в8г]

@@VitArkh Это была история восторга или вас "низко приземлили" ?

[@ЭдуардКуприенко-в8г]

Нормальный такой самолёт ✈. Штырит как надо ...

[@blackmolfar5994]

@@ЭдуардКуприенко-в8г Они там все такие,в той северной азиатской стране...

[@HeartyVias]

Что то не видать вертикального взлёта

[@ГрафДуку-ж1э]

Ето вариант с коротким взлетом и вертикальной посадкой

[@k-9k-97]

@кирилл годин и где этот як 141?

[@k-9k-97]

@кирилл годин да, да запад все скопировал у совка, а на самом деле все совок все копировал

[@k-9k-97]

@кирилл годин ахах 😂😂

[@k-9k-97]

@кирилл годин мобильный телефон не в России и не в ссср создали!

[@khaleedl2708]

I will happily trade my first wife for this

[@rehandung]

same

[@Juice23505]

I would trade my ex for a better device to watch this video on...

[@lohpidr6963]

смотрели всей Жмеринкой очень рады за пана

[@kohi2243]

カタパルト無しかよ。やべえなこれ。

[@Clappingbabies]

そうですよ

[@mikeburch2998]

I wish we could have used the Globemaster to bring our people and equipment back from Afghanistan. The equipment was only worth about 85 to 90 billion dollars so no big deal I guess. Greetings from Arizona.

[@LimpRichard]

Look up where those figures come from lemming.

[@SteeeeveC]

Wonder how many we left there?

[@rhymereason3449]

85 billion is the TOTAL expenditure over our full time there... and much of that equipment has exceeded it's useful life time and been retired, destroyed, etc.. Stop listening to FOX ditto heads... they'll make you stupid.

[@LimpRichard]

@@rhymereason3449 too late I think he is beyond saving.

[@mrwascallyt9865]

@@rhymereason3449 look up how many rifles went unaccounted for the first few years of afg. and iraq . if i recall it was in the hundreds of thousands

[@sagyndyktaniyev5166]

Лучший вариант самолёта с вертикальным взлётом на данный момент из всех серийных. Если что, то это про версию с вертикальным взлётом.

[@Cigan-pp1xe]

Вы лично все протестировали? А, это же амерское, тут по умолчанию.

[@alexanderlee1077]

А другие есть?

[@юрийбольшаков-е7л]

С воды после...как взлетать будут?

[@татищо]

Та ты шо? А сколько этот гроб на сверх звуке пролетит? А, ему не рекомендовано более 3 мин, рассыпается.

[@mrvrasar6712]

@@татищо А зачем?

[@danilabagrov7151]

А что за толчок за плафоном?

[@АлександрЕрмаков-е7м]

Там они памперсы хранят😂

[@aleksmiller1579]

Лаптеногие в своем репертуаре .

[@aleksmiller1579]

Это тебе не Сцу -57 ... которого СОВСЕМ НЕВИДНО.🤣

[@tumosmanlmuzikleri3893]

Су 57 чистое гавно

[@annamarichev8969]

Тормоз Honeywell carbenix, расположенный за кабиной, предназначен для замедления самолета. Это только русскому из Мухосранска, не знающему ни слова по-английски, деревянные толчки всюду мерещатся.

[@minhnhuttran2757]

The only thing that makes me more curious is the pilot's helmet.

[@tigerbesteverything]

you mean the thing that doesn't work properly?

[@kevin_1230]

@@tigerbesteverything Yes that is what he means.

[@robbydolson2973]

Thumbs down from Russian pilots waiting for spare parts.

[@stevenallan5822]

The Globemaster can eat F35s for breakfast and still be hungry.

[@hotmanpasaribu665]

It's comforting to see where the taxpayers money goes

[@onementality9781]

My Great Uncle flew the refilling hose

[@CerealKiller669]

@Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Hosseini Khamenei nobody cares, except for me enough to tell you nobody cares

[@martinsavage6838]

Didn’t see any “insane vertical take off”.

[@Devious292]

Nether

[@playfair6306]

There seemed to be a vertical landing at the beginning.

[@martinsavage6838]

@@playfair6306 They can do vertical landings but not take offs, insane or otherwise.

[@Simfight]

You are correct. Still a fully loaded short take off. No catapult. Pretty good.

[@thesupreme8062]

@@martinsavage6838they can do verticale landings

[@ДьяволСатана-ю4о]

А я лайк ❤️ каналу 😘

[@AndyBonesSynthPro]

I understood the heart, winky- kiss emoji, a few K's, the b= v, the H= n. I'm a child of divorce, you understand right

[@jailbreakgamin1966]

a couple 3 mins of the f35 and the rest is something way off topic .. great job guys !!

[@evazsolnaiova8819]

Krásne pristál na tej leteckej lofi

[@munchmunch6328]

" A plane that can do everything but cannot master it "

[@smyers820gm]

100+to 1 air victories in red flag exercises against almost every air craft in the us arsenal PLUS against typhoon and Indian su-30. 😂😂😂😂🫡

[@iloveaviation-burgerclub-a8145]

Do all this with full payload and a real flight mission where you need fuel to go. Well, then I am impressed. Attacking and watching the enemy launching empty fighters is just likea bonus round in arcade.

[@DeltaRaiden]

Lack of enthusiasm for a fighter doing vtol with stow away weapons from a carrier shows you don't understand what you are really looking at. I guess at face value without a Michael bay trailer its boring, for you.

[@melvinc.gramaticahomeofthe3188]

ill make my first jet fighter more than anything, missile carrier rotation can rotate in any direction will make a target forward backward left side and right side, if your enemy is at the back the missile carrier rotation of course will rotate backward easily shot the target without maneuvering to the proper position to lock the target. When applying jet roll the pilot will no longer roll with the jet, the pilot area will on its steady position even if the jet rolls many times pilot will no longer suffer motion sickness or stress because of jet roll even if the jet fly up side down there is no effect on the pilot because the pilot area stay on a steady position.

[@felixmeyer1972]

many thanks

[@jjm4643]

Thank you for explaining the vapor cloud.

[@ronaldstretti7455]

Nos amis Suisses sont hyper heureux, il a été démontré que c'est l'avion le plus pourri des 4 choix

[@TheLambdaGuy]

On va revoter ça en Novembre, parce que c'est tout simplement ridicule. Un choix purement politique, et pas opérationnel. Tout les autres étaient moins cher et meilleurs sur pratiquement tout les plans, c'est juste pour faire plaisir aux Americains, que la confédération a choisis le F-35

[@AlexWild579]

Il est grosse vache cette avion...et le décalage vertical pour la frime pour l'ego pour dire tien tu ma vu.....nul 0 mature.. France mature usa branleur

[@ronaldstretti7455]

@@TheLambdaGuy peut être que pour faire plaisir aux Américains la confédération a accepté dans un premier temps tout en sachant qu'il ne passerait les urnes, j’espère que votre prochain choix sera plus raisonnable.

[@prenom5728]

@@ronaldstretti7455 Le choix du Rafale est plus raisonnable. En plus, on pourra négocier le droit de leur faire survoler notre espace aérien, la Suisse étant tellement petite, un avion à réaction n'a pas le temps de décoller qu'il est déjà hors de leurs frontières.

[@AlexWild579]

@@arnaud922 Russie nos sauveur de ww2 39.45...arrêté de sucer usa....

[@geilsonduarterodrigues8842]

Máquina impressionante

[@bobrosso9147]

what it must be like to fly a hot rod like this....holyshit batman

[@felixmeyer1972]

Es hat einige Zeit gedauert bis ich verstanden hatte warum die Schweiz die F-35 Stealth kauft. Für den Luftpolizei-Dienst ist das Flugzeug bedingt geeignet. Aber der zukünftige Krieg wird mit Drohnen ausgeführt. Zur Bekämpfung von Drohnen ist der F-35 Stealth bestens geeignet!

[@Albatard1981]

Nice ! I just hope that the sea would remain calm & the wind low in case of conflict. Otherwise, they'll be stuck on desk.

[@ScarHornet]

미친 능력은 언제 보여줌?

[@KrenT117]

번역이 이상해서 그래요... 수직 이륙에 뛰어난(미친) 성능을 보여주는 F-35로 번역하는게 뉘앙스가 맞습니다.

[@LargeTiger]

ㅋㅋㅋ

[@vilmasantos9629]

Eles sao maravilhosos!

[@ИИванов-ь6с]

Как летает этот самолет мы все знаем. Покажите то, что видит пилот :))) В этом изюминка этого истребителя

[@eddiebigluck9816]

SU-57 better!

[@olegtereschenko6701]

@Sirius Black Sirius Black и eddie bigluck два тролля говонеда

[@3BE3DHbIUiKOT]

@@eddiebigluck9816 LoL 😆

[@ИИванов-ь6с]

@@eddiebigluck9816 Су-57 это консервная банка!

[@michaelkannon8243]

1984 I was in MCAS El Toro when VMA-211 was still driving A-4M Skyhawks. A few of those older airframes had noticeable patches from Viet Nam Era damage. The F-35b at 40 years later is Buck Rogers.

[@mr.electronx9036]

USAF: We have awsame Jets Aliens: UFO zooom-zooom lol 🤣🤣🤣

[@ImayavarambanGK]

Bruh?

[@artemzhalba758]

Это вам не рашкин хлам! Cool.

[@blackmolfar5994]

И то не рашкин,а совковый.

[@hemmers86]

Why is everything insane these days?

[@markg1019]

In this case, it's probably somebody who has never heard of a Harrier jet. Seriously, this is 1960s stuff, it's not "insane".

[@jodohead]

Honestly, have you looked around lately?

[@РамильНурмухамедов-к7ю]

Все круто... Отлажено

[@DenBat_75]

Почитай, как там у него все "отлажено". Сколько американские вояки зарегистрировали проблем этого самолета на производителя.

[@olbash7158]

@@DenBat_75 и че? заглох на параде?

[@marsrocket]

I didn’t realize they were that fast. What an amazing plane.