US To Arm Zumwalt-Class Ships With Hypersonic Weapons Amid Tensions With Putin’s Russia & Xi’s China

The US Navy has decided to repurpose the troubled Zumwalt-class destroyers by retrofitting them with hypersonic missiles. Hypersonic missiles will be installed on three US destroyer-class ships this month, according to a report in Asia Times.
With this move, Pentagon aims to increase its capabilities at sea and counter possible Chinese and Russian threats. The Zumwalt-class destroyers would be the first US naval platform to be armed with hypersonic weapons.
#USSZumwalt #HypersonicMissile #USNavy
00:00 INTRODUCTION
CHANGES LIKELY IN ZUMWALT-CLASS DESTROYERS
ISSUES WITH ZUMWALT-CLASS DESTROYERS
HOW US FARES AGAINST CHINA & RUSSIA IN HYPERSONIC WEAPONS
CRUX is your daily video news guide to the big events that are shaping our world. We track news, geopolitics, diplomacy and defence strategies and explain how they shape national policies. Crux makes sense of global developments, and analyses their impact on daily lives.
Follow CRUX on Instagram (@crux.india): bit.ly/3qSFx1K
Follow CRUX on Facebook: bit.ly/2Lte7iF
#GetCloserToTheNews with latest headlines on politics, sports and entertainment on news18.com bit.ly/2Y4QccL
Also watch:
Crux Decode: bit.ly/3MjzIoG
Crux+ : bit.ly/35mm97B
Crux Most Watched: bit.ly/3KhJ8iX

[@stellaohenhen2365]

Good It is about time I was starting to worried about the delay of US ability to get their own hypersonic missiles, however I do believe that United States will do better than the Chinese and Russia when it comes to hypersonic missiles.

[@FodayMoiwa-do2in]

If the US have finally managed to make hypersonic missiles, then it means Russia had long since been on another level.

[@supriokonar9584]

Isn't this the same zumwalt destroyer that doesn't have any ammunitions for it's originally planned main railguns? Because the US navy deemed the cost of firing all of it's rounds in a single battle would be twice the cost the of the vessel itself?

[@julienjeanmuller]

Lol! US military are trolls. Exactly bro. And I guarantee you, them saying that means they been had hypersonic missiles the whole time they were denying it on TV.

[@Chunkylover.]

It's all bluff and lie 🤥 america with hypersonic missiles is so far from reality, now they are more delusional than ever.

[@Aryan-nv9kd]

Basically a trash unproven design which can be sunk by the high waves of the ocean itself xD. The US has long proven it's corrupt over funded weapons programs which do not work as advertised. They only send these so called "exceptional" weapons to poor countries with 1960s weaponry and then thump their chests in victory for a while before tucking their tails and running out of the country with their failed invasions. Their stealth jets have been downed in Siberia by decades old Russian SAM missiles and the new F35s face so many issues that there have been multiple crashes within months of induction.

[@GangsterAD]

@@Chunkylover. "U.S ARMY HYPERSONIC MISSILE CHECK IT OUT YO"!!..

[@Hi0613]

bro realgun an hypersonic messle it is bad ass

[@макслюлюкин]

only the USA does not have hypersonic missiles themselves, but Russia today used a hypersonic Dagger missile at targets in Ukraine

[@jamram9924]

They’re testing it to see it’s efficacy. What a better place to do this test!

[@kenshields7922]

@@jamram9924 yer i agree on your house boomed .🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@juancarlospayan4671]

Russian military is a joke...

[@jamram9924]

@@juancarlospayan4671 their lack of fighting experience makes them appear weak. They didn’t have luxury of fighting in many foreign interventions like the US did in Vietnam and the Middle East. As a combat veteran having lost brothers in arms, our experience came it at a great loss in people and national treasure. They’ll gain a lot of experience in this “operation” and so far it appears they’ve lost many more soldiers than the US did when we returned to Iraq in 2003. Let the body count increase

[@rohandas5643]

@@RWPCONRAD BS to you lie Empire of lies American 🤣

[@ХРЕНОРЕЗ]

Yes, the United States will deploy hypersonic weapons on Zumwalt-class ships, but with a caveat, this will happen in about 10-20 years and not earlier.

[@ulyssesbinoya1134]

zomwalts only used for parade and advertisements of ships and weaponry...

[@stephenchen9701]

That's assuming Biden doesn't divert the funds to his not as urgent infrastructure plan

[@懒程序员-约翰-p8s]

as always: proposed to have lots of capability with low cost. end up with less capability at more than proposed cost.

[@kenshields7922]

@@stephenchen9701 his son needs the money along with the money he got from ukraine

[@alexanderheling2057]

Ukraine has no control over their country they are a western satellite country since 2014 at least. Western military advisors and geopolitical counselors are in full control not Ukrainian gov/military/citizens.

[@trade1713]

Since when The US have hypersonic missiles?? Have I missed something about them becoming operational?

[@raymondsarvarian9074]

No my friend you haven’t miss anything even the latest US hypersonic test was a failure and US dose not have hypersonic weapons. Even Chinese hypersonic is not as fastes Russian missiles, Chinese only hypersonic is a anti ship missile just over the minimum speed of a hypersonic speed. Which it’s still better then US failure after failure tests.

[@williamsherman1942]

We had supersonic missiles in the cold war, we stopped using them for the same reason we didn’t focus on anti-air defense. We focused on the air force and navy really, didn’t believe that missiles alone could win the war. If any missiles were to be fired it would be nuclear warheads

[@bright5801]

@@raymondsarvarian9074 that's just one program there are so many hypersonic projects going on. the weapon used here will be very similar to the LRHW (dark eagle) which has already started to deliver fire control systems and training has started

[@apex_blue]

They probably had them operational for a while. I mean it isn’t that hard it’s literally putting wings on a ballistic missile. the space shuttle regularly came into the atmosphere at Mach 20.

[@t.yiachan869]

​@@raymondsarvarian9074 no Buddy the u.s has hypersonic was machine since the 60s they just didn't put it to use,,also there's many hypersonic program so keep praying because we already ahead.

[@phantom_rantom8489]

Everyone here complaining about if the US have hypersonic missiles or not while I'm here thinking of what kind of tank design the US army choose

[@davidsotovega9113]

🤣

[@starcraft2f2p77]

US hypersonic cruise missile test failed. US does have other hypersonic weapons. The video didn't say which type of missile.

[@GangsterAD]

"U.S ARMY HYPERSONIC MISSILE🚀HOMIE"!!..

[@Hunterxrt]

USAF AGM-183 failed.Not the US army Dark Eagle hypersonic weapon.US navy plans to equip Zumwalt destroyers with the naval version of the Dark Eagle.

[@jeffrey4181]

The most is subsonic 3.5 mach.

[@johnsilver9338]

An operational hypersonic LRHW (Long Range Hypersonic Weapon) missile battery has already been delivered to the Army since October last year. But it wont be until next year at earliest that they deploy it to the front lines. The Navy will soon follow but its to big to fitted on current Arleigh Burke destroyers. Hence, it will be fitted on existing Zumwalt class and Virginia class subs and the future DDG(x). The Airforce have their own versions but it will still take some time for them. What failed is the airforce one.

[@starcraft2f2p77]

@@Hunterxrt That is a hypersonic glide weapon not hypersonic cruise missile.

[@yourmomismywaifu4274]

waiting the us to arm with hypersonic missles is like waiting for russia to done with fixing the kutuzov and replace new destroyers

[@СергейКолосов-е2й]

"Адмирал Нахимов" с вчерашнего дня в строю🤣🇷🇺

[@yourmomismywaifu4274]

@@СергейКолосов-е2й good luck with that rusty oversized cruiser

[@jasondong9721]

So true lol

[@makauonesmus7357]

Where will they get hypersonic missiles from,import from China or Russia

[@JoseVasquez-gi6ok]

From North Korea..lol

[@WalkOverHotCoal]

They fell off the back of a truck.

[@makauonesmus7357]

@@WalkOverHotCoal probably

[@arvindynr]

US doesn't have any successfully tested hypersonic missiles, so what are they going to install in these destroyers? 😂😂

[@infoshaheen]

Fireworks

[@nischaltyagi8672]

🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@foxbanana5097]

Every hypersonic missile has low range

[@pauld.9856]

Doesn't the area that is declared as Hypersonic only start at Mach 6? I vaguely remember the F14 Tomcat having long-range air-to-air missiles at Mach 5 about 30 years ago. Then they would have had Hypersonic rockets back then.

[@marshawk9766]

I think that category is only supersonic, we are talking of HYPER - > Mach 5 above. But Russia has Mach 20 above.

[@deven6518]

Mach 5 +1mph . Anything above mach 5. The thing is that missiles have a high speed at some point along their path but not the whole way. Air to air missiles generally have an initial burn, glide to their target on inertia and some save just a lil bit of fuel to make manuvers at final approach. Aa missiles are mach 3+, 4+, 5+ etc, but not for long so they don't count

[@apex_blue]

Also ballistic missile and any space rockets goes hypersonic. The space shuttle regularly enters the atmosphere at Mach 20. So we had the technology for years it just was not needed until Russia and China started weaponizing them. kzbin.info/www/bejne/qISzoHltfq6YnLc

[@liewwilliam4334]

US is talking about supersonic missiles because they misspelt supersonic to be hypersonic.😁🤣

[@BorntoYeet]

Haha good one hilarious great haha. Not as funny as dead Russian soldiers though

[@d.1262]

@@BorntoYeet Even less funny than dead American volunteers who didn't get the paycheck yet

[@marya7057]

@@BorntoYeet Hahahaha

[@roastingminer6919]

@@BorntoYeet but its not funnier then all the dead American soldiers in the middle east 🤷

[@yyperi]

@@d.1262 Volunteers aren't mercenaries. Ukraine doesn't have to pay them to fight. Russia has to import thousands of Arabs from Syria because his own troops are dead or don't want to be in war. It's quite pathetic for a "superpower".

[@marianflorczak5262]

Good bless US Army.Restore.Peace .Freedom.Prosperity.Only.USA.

[@floydrandol2731]

Yes, that’s the Weapon our Enemy’s have and claim we don’t. What about the Laser Systems that downs Hypersonic missiles. The Ships were way over on costs and we need to get better for money spent.

[@davidreynoso8593]

Great News 👍

[@pratikdharanep.d.8938]

*Realized first time that US doesn't have hypersonic weapons and not even thier navy has it!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣*

[@trentlandon9033]

FYI.. Usa was the first country to test hypersonic.. Just that it doesn't require them... The day it does.. It would be available.. India should properly feed its hungry homeless people first...your army has weapons from west and Russia.. Lol

[@pratikdharanep.d.8938]

@@trentlandon9033 *KEEEP BARKINGGG....we r a growing economy and a growing super power....our econony and our public are coming out of poverty!!! In next 10 years china and india will strat ruling the world! Keeep barking!!!*

[@krizzyDeleon1850]

@@pratikdharanep.d.8938 in your dreams. Don't worry, being friends with china will make you rich......in debts lol.

[@humorousshorts739]

@@pratikdharanep.d.8938 are bhai kya ch#tiyapa kar rahe ho USA ke pass nahi hai hypersonic missle toh humare pass kaunsa hai.

[@nischaltyagi8672]

@@trentlandon9033 Brahmos 2 is being jointly developed (world's fastest hypersonic missile) by Russia and India. If you have guts, make your own missile jointly, lmao with another country. Even Brahmos is much better than useless AGM- 86🤣

[@organicrobot4710]

Lets not act like the US hasnt had hypersonic capabilities since the 60s...if the US mentions military tech, theyve likely had it in their inventory for 20 years already...look up the "Sprint" missile system...MACH 10.

[@rockyfjord3753]

US hasn't has sh*t in terms of hypersonic missiles. Stop believing video games are reality.

[@kornbob2665]

USA is still behind Russia and China in Hypersonic Missile technology. The USA still failed in their latest Hypersonic Missile tests.

[@phantom_rantom8489]

@@rockyfjord3753 "ah yes totally tell the public our capabilities in military terms, our enemies totally won't take notes" believe it or not but this guy is actually stating a fact

[@organicrobot4710]

@@rockyfjord3753 Look up the US "Sprint missle" and when the US first deployed it, tells you all you need to know about their level tech...MACH 10.

[@Chunkylover.]

Hahaha looks like Us is desperate to make itself look tough, what a shame 🙂

[@BabbyCat3008]

I bet the Indo-Russian Brahmos supersonic missile is more effective than the American hypersonic missile.

[@jirachi-wishmaker9242]

🙄bakwaas kyun karte ho jab malum nahi hain kuch v

[@jtcarroll123]

Only one way to find out!

[@suvch5842]

True

[@khojendra8832]

That's not true. American missiles are faster and better than Brahmos even though they pale in comparison to Russian missile.

[@中共戰士萬歲]

There is a difference between SuperSonic and HyperSonic. You either didn't watch the video properly or dont know the difference between the two.

[@crusaderclarkplays5466]

Who ever hear or watch a video about US failure of Hypersonic missile. It's a bait to everyone and it will reach to the enemy how US are failed to make hypersonic missile. But US is very good at schemes and very wise Super power.

[@horizons2358]

Very good Sherlock !

[@k5elevencinc0]

Killdeer

[@Abhay-bz5qp]

I don’t think US has a hypersonic missile. They failed miserably in testing.

[@rogerfaint499]

Those trials conducted by US barely lasted 10 seconds before they exploded.

[@cybercebuto]

maybe american stick to subsonic which stable than supersonic or hypersonic but late from the competitor

[@wendelldig591]

4:45 lol

[@joebrown1158]

@@wendelldig591 America as a super power can not tell the truth remember what happened in Afghanistan when America tested hypersonic it was all lies America has it before any country

[@emersonwaminal9164]

Maybe they can test it again in Afghanistan to prove it in some idiots

[@pahtar7189]

FYI: Mach 27 is orbital velocity, so the Russian Avangard is basically equivalent to a launch vehicle, meaning it's very large and expensive. Don't expect Russia to field many of them.

[@dejanzdravkovic9010]

For USA one Poseidon is enough. Nuclear tsunami if you know what I mean?

[@dschoas]

Did they mention a year, when they will have the hypersonic weapons ready to be installed in the ship? 2030 maybe? What do they expect the costs for the fitting of these weapons, magazin, loading mechanism and launch system to be? As much as the already existing hull?

[@dwanemarsh4378]

Yes, they have hypersonics. Here is the easier question; We see the Russian Air Force can't even control the skies above Ukraine; what the hell do you think the massive U.S. Air Force would do to them? It would get very ugly, quickly, for Russia. And then, just bring in the A-10's to take out all the hypersonic launchers. The U.S. already knows exactly where they all are (it's called satellites!).

[@jjt229]

Hahaha did you actually believe that Russia is ahead of US in any military technology with a budget more than 10x lower and a lot bigger corruption ? The reason why US is not caring about hypersonic missiles too much is that they are pretty much useless. I bet you read how accurate they are. Only miss target by 10-20 miles xDD When the rocket goes so fast, it is impossible to for it to communicate with any other technology due to plasma it creates, so long range accurate hypersonic missiles for moving targets are a joke :D

[@paoloangaroni1907]

Against communism, United.. what a beautiful feeling..Beats!

[@AmarSingh-vb7lo]

First make a hypersonic missile ... 😂

[@WalkOverHotCoal]

It is my understanding that before this Zumwalt Class Destroyer could fire hyper-sonic missiles, it needs to have the missiles first. it is also my understanding that America doesn't have hyper-sonic missiles for quite some time yet. Two previous tests failed. my questions to CRUX are... (1). Where did it get the "exclusive" news? (2). Did America provide the "exclusive" news to CRUX? (3). If CRUX is indeed right, did America buy the missiles from Russia or China, or God forbidden, N Korea?

[@waterof1465]

i did some digging but the ones failed are US airforce hypersonic AGM-183 , currently the US has Dark Eagle for the army, they will probably turn that into a Navy Version. i maybe wrong tho.

[@deven6518]

There is a bit of iff. Most ballistic and high altitude missiles ate hypersonic at some point along the flight path. Hypersonic missles as defined in the east, can maintain this for the majority of the flight, and some not even at particularly high altitudes. You see, ICBMs are hypersonic and they can be intercepted so Its not just a matter of terminal stage velocity. If they can't achieve and maintain it along the entire path, they'll be useless. It remains to be seen with some "properly independent" information. Casue last I remember they had a successful test, but not a successful missile, if that makes sense.

[@BoomerKeith1]

I think a lot of people think that hypersonic ability is something brand new. Like you said, the US (and Russia and China, etc.) have had hypersonic technology for decades. There's so much more to the effectiveness of hypersonic missiles than just being able to do hypersonic speed. I'm not convinced that what was used in Ukraine was truly a hypersonic missile. Anyone can claim that's what it was. Like you, I've seen reports of tests that were successful in launch and flight, without success of the overall goal. The US DoD announced last year that he first hypersonic missiles would be put into service this year. So, that's not something that just got announced in light of what's happening in Ukraine.

[@johnnyontar6058]

War in Ukraine

[@vinaybhat7670]

USA is adopting "FAKE it till u MAKE it" 😂

[@URBAN_Resistance]

Did US successfully produce a hypersonic missle? Last time i read is the 3rd attemp of firing it failed

[@abith_peter4317]

They have many unlike india or north Korea they didn't show up in public..because chinese waiting to copy their data's 😂

[@johnsilver9338]

An operational hypersonic LRHW (Long Range Hypersonic Weapon) missile battery has already been delivered to the Army since October last year. But it wont be until next year at earliest that they deploy it to the front lines. The Navy will soon follow but its to big to fitted on current Arleigh Burke destroyers. Hence, it will be fitted on existing Zumwalt class and Virginia class subs and the future DDG(x). The Airforce have their own versions but it will still take some time for them. What keeps failing is the airforce one.

[@sharumalavemi9845]

@@abith_peter4317 Whaaatt.. Chinese waiting to copy usa...🤔 You must be kidding. Best Joke .. 👌

[@abith_peter4317]

@@sharumalavemi9845 yes that's not big joke they copy Russian, israel and US and other Europe tech and do copy cat things..in military

[@xtinedavis5119]

@@sharumalavemi9845 lol most of chinese technologies were US/Japan knock off

[@silentwatcher1455]

Where will US get a real, working hypersonic missile?

[@remohdude]

They never tell to their enemies. So sshhhhhhh..

[@cv1683]

They already have although they say their under development or hve failed they may hold something u never know🤐

[@cv1683]

Countries like india china north korea and russia having is ok but when u speak about usa country which is a step higher as always ... Keeps us thinking is usa really hiding something

[@Chunkylover.]

Pffff very sad, west is full of lies👏🤡

[@suvch5842]

@@cv1683 AND INDIA OR RUSSIA CANNOT HIDE ANYTHING LOL......

[@juliomenendez5164]

They gotta send 1000 fishing boats and one zumwalt

[@kafirmohallida8486]

50 years from now...

[@geraldlevin5141]

However great the probability of a Russian nuclear attack (2-50%), NATO intervention is appropriate. WHY? The probability of a repeat invasion, of another state, with the SAME nuclear attack risk, is above 50%. A no-fly buffer of 25KM beyond Poland & Romanian borders can be maintained; with stand-off missiles (from NATO area)

[@singhdeepak10]

It's a bluff, US and NATO don't have hypersonic missile.

[@zen0432]

They don't even have a proper hypersonic missile😑

[@thorodinson8755]

last time I heard their hypersonic missile test failed... right?

[@julienjeanmuller]

@The Original Hybrid says the Nation who denies almost every military assets they have. Only to declassify them 20 yrs later.

[@amitmondal4976]

Now they have when USA made a weapon it's looks very different from anyone it's like God mode on so I think USA made hypersonic missile will be better than china and Russ , that's my personal opinion though

[@organicrobot4710]

The US has had hypersonic missiles since the 60s...dont fool yourself.

[@remohdude]

Gossipers in KZbin is all over..Lol

[@sublimmadem6027]

We love peace and continue to expect that peace prevails over the world but there is some group of countries that have different and petit interests in bullying and forcibly dominating other countries. This is dangerous and likely to invite nuclear war but they are least concerned with it. It makes the world think of another strong superpower so that the balance can be maintained. Else, the world is doomed now or sometimes in the near future.

[@primepatriotone2443]

Name and shame the devils will you? We just want to check if all our answers are correct. 😁😁😁

[@amareshroy7732]

USA is a democratic nation. Putin Xi pin can develop more weapons at the cost of welfare of citizens.

[@TheNoblot]

in war main media always lies since the truth is the first casualty of war / however brainwashing😶‍🌫️😫😨🥵is the first advantage of governments, hope you lot survive otherwise welcome to animal farm version BORIS JHONSON 🤑🤐🤑🤐🤣🙈🙉🙊🐒🐕‍🦺

[@raishaferreira8099]

God bless ukania family and volunteers 🌎💛💙

[@kamoteph273]

isn't these the same ships with not fireproof bridges? one fire incident is enough to melt the bridge. they better be careful when firing missiles

[@malichase535]

I'm proud American, we're the best in the world in everything.

[@jackpeipei820730]

Will not be too long time

[@modemstar7920]

Ok,but who is the manufacturer of the zumuwalt destroyers?

[@rodalonso7805]

Here for the music😎🤷‍♂️

[@timothydodson557]

Strategic mental defence.

[@ShaileshSingh-tm6ou]

Russia spooked the US by using KINZHAL. 🤣🤣

[@nischaltyagi8672]

Gaand phaad di Putin ne in goro ki🤣🤣🤣🤣. But still, I pray for Ukrainian citizens, in this war, they suffered a lot😔

[@glennquagmire3258]

The proliferation of weapons that can not be thwarted is an excellent idea in keeping the peace. Especially if you put on nuclear tactical warheads like the BB-16.

[@deven6518]

Well that was the first stake between the us and Russia, pulling out of a nuclear treaty. The concept of mAD was in that no state would develop anti ballistic missile defenses.....but well, yk. Now there is a nuclear arms race, not in quantity but in delivery methods. The idea of both sides having weapons that can't be defended against will bring peace if the quantities are also limited. Unfortunately, both Russia and china already have defenses against hypersonics so let the arms race continue

[@IAMAVIKJORDAN]

It isnt yet a couple of days that we got news of Russian using Hypersonic Missiles in Ukraine. USA did pick this up and now they are arming their ships with such missiles , Aren't they late ?

[@dwanemarsh4378]

Actually, they started "arming" some ships a few days after Russia attacked Ukraine. Some are already fully armed. But, they surely won't advertise it much!

[@publictoilet7832]

russia / china / north korea: showing our superpower every year parade.. us: we dont need parade we allways win in every war 😂

[@utkarshdubey5393]

Us has not even tested the hypersonic missile how they will armed it with warships.

[@redtum4845]

when it comes to technology dude they are far ahead from the two, consider the HLTV conducted by darpa and Boeing X51 waverider

[@utkarshdubey5393]

@@redtum4845 what's the point of technology when they can't use in practical combat role.

[@JACKAL747]

How do you know? Do you not know the USA is the most secretive about its Weapon systems? Only an idiot would think otherwise

[@redtum4845]

@@utkarshdubey5393 they are intended to be strategic bomb, chinese hypersonics missed its target 20 miles from the intended, you can watch sandboxx for more infro

[@bibhanshu82]

What I had heard in News was US didn't had hyper sonic missiles. So may be this is Hollywood movie?

[@emersonwaminal9164]

Hahah they will test it in your country and don't blaim them of weapons of mass distraction...

[@dloui5214]

true ! and will fully operational in 2050

[@captainfokker3951]

2021 November USA failed on its third time testing it hypersonic missiles .2022 January Pentagon was urging USA weapons manufacturer and NASA to work together in order to achieve hypersonic technology as first as they can. Europe are still on a research as well as joint partner of Australia, Japan and south Korea. It may take more than 2 years to achieve the technology as usa defense analists announced .China, north korea and Russia are the only country have acquired hypersonic technology

[@МагжанСыдыков]

North Korea -- 😹😹😹 Jeez! Even north Korea has it while the US don't) Pathetic.

[@garymanis6305]

Smoke screen. The Chinese DF-17 looks like a close copy of what the US developed that would hit Mach 10 about 20 years ago. Russia's latest operational hypersonic missile reportedly is limited to Mach 8.

[@garymanis6305]

Russia is claiming Mach 27 because they knew we were developing Mach 25.

[@captainfokker3951]

@@garymanis6305 were are those lies have you heard from, USA doesn't have hypersonic missiles .just look from sky news petengon annousing that they were highly concern on USA security after Russia tested missile 19 times faster than the speed of sound as estimated by USA .Russia announced their missile travels at mach 22 .USA is still behind in establishing hypersonic capabilities as USA defense analyst said . ( those are not my words ).if USA and NATO are stronger together they would have retaliate Russia but they just watch from far .USA refused Poland to supply Ukraine fighter jets reason Poland will not be spared as well. Russia can paralys USA in less than 30 minutes. Interms of nuclear attacks.

[@garymanis6305]

@@captainfokker3951 Russia announced that their missile hits Mach 27. They have also stated that their fastest operational missile is limited to Mach 8. Lots of claims and lots of much too public statements of what should be top secret information by the US Pentagon. Sounds like a smoke screen to me.

[@ishaks8152]

Getting crazier.

[@ЛёшенькаЖеланный]

Who knows why this miracle ship has never approached our Russian shores? Or is it a ship for combat protection of coastal waters?

[@robertschweppie5256]

MAYBE YOU'LL SEE IT ONE DAY ,WHEN ITS TOO LATE,TIMES RUNNING OUT.

[@hugdealer4097]

Ur russian?

[@СергейКолосов-е2й]

Он не вооружен и не мореходен

[@zachaddington5264]

USA USA!

[@WombRaider_theoriginal]

Why would military vessels approach russian shores?

[@rudiechinchilla6746]

The US was established by God himself by freedom and democratic values, as is my country: Costa Rica , and the US keeps ´s the balance in the world. Now with this War on, it s just an awakening that they have to keep up their role in World s affairs

[@brunodrivel2487]

master race? we had one before that belived that.

[@WalkOverHotCoal]

The Crack Cocaine in your country Costa Rica must be super pure. You don't want to overdo it amigo.

[@kunal25roy]

But they have to develop that first right???

[@Chunkylover.]

Failed 4 times and more to come

[@johnsilver9338]

An operational hypersonic LRHW (Long Range Hypersonic Weapon) missile battery has already been delivered to the Army since October last year. But it wont be until next year at earliest that they deploy it to the front lines. The Navy will soon follow but its to big to fitted on current Arleigh Burke destroyers. Hence, it will be fitted on existing Zumwalt class and Virginia class subs and the future DDG(x). The Airforce have their own versions but it will still take some time for them. What keeps failing is the airforce one.

[@salilpanwar6922]

@@djajzkjljjfzzf7372 x-51 is a testbed you need to properly guide it and weaponise it as will.... is testbeds are the criteria then India has hypersonic missiles and lasers to destroy whole planes....

[@karlsalomon1723]

I remember during Syrian war two Russian warships in the Caspian sea fire cruise missiles to hit target in Syria, the west were surprise and their media crunk up propaganda that some of this missile has fallen down somewhere in Iran that kill some goat,

[@haroldbell213]

Damn those goats get in the way ever time

[@YengPodMingAnalyst]

Time to fight Russia, this is great ship

[@rockyfjord3753]

Can that boat dive below the surface or is that just my imagination? The Zumwalt, Litterol, and Sea Hunter were all ideas from a white paper with hand drawings sent to Darpa circa 1997 titled 'The Organic Battlefield.' Darpa is still developing ideas from that paper. The author was a homeless man.

[@markfrost1375]

Can only ‘dive’ once sunk…the bow is the new wave piercer design …keeps ship leveller

[@rockyfjord3753]

@@markfrost1375 Ok, thanks. I somehow thought somebody would design a surface ship that could at minimum, sail below the surface, but I guess with modern radars, it wouldn't be that stealthy anyhow.

[@vinmarusop5592]

Very very good nice weapons

[@KcirnaS31]

Star Wars vibe! Sailor with light sabers.

[@lshepherd5859]

good , now send them immediately to the black sea for battle proven testing programme.

[@isrealjohn3255]

Lol the USA is playing ketchup right now 🤣😂

[@425HP]

Good thing they don't reveal how many missiles it will carry. Some people would be stupid enough to announce all the specifications to our enemies.

[@robn02]

What a joke. The US can't get a Hypersonic missile 'of the ground' yet. LOL. China and Russia way ahead in the game.

[@didyoumissedmegobareatersk2204]

😂Haga Propaganda

[@thanosave7112]

My opinion: in order to intercept these type of missiles usa could build a missiles which explodes and released a cloud of tiny missiles a mile wide . That could stop a hyposonic missile. this could be a great defense.

[@lunafringe10]

dont look too good for a country when it lost 9 out of 10 wars,

[@expertscreativity7571]

Make a video on US hypersonic missile tests.

[@awequayzngs1780]

Escalation in the direction of the middle east as always !. History always repeat itself.

[@lilacer6841]

they dont have these missiles yet apparrently?

[@sjv9147s]

All said, good. When?

[@spiritualawareness7736]

The problem is that the PENTAGON says that they will have that capacity until at least 2025

[@LonWULF]

I thought they (USA) don't have hypersonic missiles 🤔

[@jabiraxmed7898]

They dont have . War head is easy part dont spread a fake news

[@WalkOverHotCoal]

Virtual ones in MetaVerse.

[@apex_blue]

I mean look at the Sprint Missile. The US has had the technology for decades it just had no reason to until recently.

[@siddeshbandekar1913]

Good morning Joe Biden

[@alexpalembang7665]

Wowwww so amazing. Would it be more lethal if the military equipments have Huawei 5G capability 😀

[@krizzyDeleon1850]

Huawei 5G is chyyynna's spying device

[@yaboyed5779]

Didn’t they can the Zumwalts? Like they don’t even have ammo due to budgetary constraints.

[@georgelewis2988]

Yep, straight after they commission their Death Star.

[@asakurayoh3909]

The design of this new destroyer looks so pathetic, i have also heard, it’s good for nothing.

[@Einwetok]

LOL, it was good form wasting a LOT of money, and proving the fantasy environment it was built for was too tough for it..

[@QasimAli-to5lk]

The zumwalt isn't even operational

[@julienjeanmuller]

That's what they been telling since its inception. But if you're familiar with this type of BS, whenever they deny something, it means they been there done that. So wait another 10 yrs to find out, following a movie about the very tech they say they didn't exist. That's the US military in a nutshell.

[@ricohernandez8800]

Is it the same that didn't work right? Couple times the NAVY tested and it was a failure

[@skyemilk]

Wow someone got spooked...

[@sujoybarua3907]

Hypersonic is the next form of all missiles from all launchers

[@againstviralmisinformation510]

First they have to successfully test one 😂😂

[@williamsherman1942]

We did, in the cold war. Merely a year and we’ll be in the top again

[@frankfucwit5461]

What made this decision? The hypersonic weapon that just killed some americans at the nato base in ukraine??

[@ericme5715]

Are phele bolo unko hypersonic missiles bana to le tab laga lena destroyer mein😂

[@KingKm-c9n]

They have that?

[@Mundo-bn2ho]

I didn' t know the US had any? Were they designed and manufactured in 1 week?

[@williamsherman1942]

We had them in the cold war, they were called minutemen III. They went very very fast, the Soviets were terrified of them,

[@Mundo-bn2ho]

@@williamsherman1942 Minuteman were ICBM's

[@williamsherman1942]

@@Mundo-bn2ho It might’ve not been hypersonic missiles, but they were very fast and showed that we Americans knew how missiles worked. I doubt that we’ve simply forgotten how to create missiles lmao

[@fadzilbastun392]

Zumwalt to get hypersonic weapons meaning DON'T HAVE THEM YET

[@marinamostert6870]

Super human brains, use your talents to better human exsistence

[@Akaneblaze1345]

When i look at this beautiful ship the one thing i notice is How big it's eyebrows are 3:26 so pretty. 🤗🤗

[@amitranjan5590]

Us ke pas kha se aagya hypersonic weapon

[@goodik4885]

It's a good news. US- 💪💪

[@ronaldrosen6472]

The fitting of hypersonic missiles should have occured years ago. Russia didn't wait or ask the USA for permission to fit hypersonic missiles on its ships.

[@adambeaulieu6868]

Put those destroyers at the bottom of the ocean. Problem Solved!

[@patrickoruko6238]

PUT THEM THERE FAST, AND LET PUTIN KNOW.!

[@meroepiankhy183]

US hypersonic missiles doesn't even work. Three tries, three failures.

[@colemeeker908]

Interesting. We have 2 zumwalts and the class was cancelled

[@rubensoria7457]

Excellent idea do it now

[@ripangoswami3809]

Once you remember a chines jet got burned with busted

[@jimmymacalos4881]

Only ordinary missiles not hypersonic

[@chrisbremner8992]

Zumwalt destroyers will be scrapped, a colossal waste of money.

[@romeoiipunzalan1079]

Honestly 3 ships? Even if this ship teleported to the battlefield 3 ships still wont be enough... to win a fight..

[@johnnylim641]

Yeah, yeah...if the hypersonic missiles can even work.