USAF Just Testing AI Piloted F-16 Fighter Jet That Can Dogfight

Рет қаралды 49,656

US Defense News

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 64

@marsrocket 8 ай бұрын

I don’t understand why this isn’t showing up more in mainstream media. This is an amazing achievement.

@d.g.1986 8 ай бұрын

1) They dont want our adversaries to know what we're doing (they need to work for their intelligence) 2) If the cost of these programs was put on public display, half of US tax payers would loose their 💩! And the DoD doesn't want the push back.

@itzjowii 8 ай бұрын

It’s crazy

@locknload9143 Жыл бұрын

From what I understood, every single kill was head on. Normally that's not how you shoot down an aircraft but, being AI, there is no fear.

@Blacks4Trump2024 Жыл бұрын

I seen the ai outclass a top f16 pilot in simulation it can do more but why let all your tricks out

@1990-w1l Жыл бұрын

you can pull a higher G-force if you dont have flesh to tolerate that G-force, AI can eazy pull much G-Force as their want

@Ghost-pb4ts 11 ай бұрын

AS MUCH AS PLANE MATERIAL CAn withstand PRETTY SURE COMPUTE ISNT AFFECTED BY GFORCE@@1990-w1l

@tachyon8317 8 ай бұрын

@@1990-w1l as the airframe can theoretically handle*

@ryana1787 8 ай бұрын

@@Blacks4Trump2024The AI was given massive advantages. It had perfect knowledge of the other aircraft’s state. So it’s not as impressive as it sounds. It certainly didn’t outclass the human.

@MiserableJosephson Жыл бұрын

These are the F-16s the US should be sending to Ukraine. "Just Press 'Fly'". It would save them 4 months of conversion training.

@happyman1728 Жыл бұрын

imagine you have dreamed to be a fighter pilot since child hood

@UnchartedCTG 7 ай бұрын

Then the Air Force says: "Nah, son. AI."

@d.g.1986 8 ай бұрын

Yep, lets put the AI in all of our deadliest weapons and teach it how to beat us... 😂

@slender5738 5 ай бұрын

Not in our lifetime bro, stop watching too much movies we don't have AGI yet, Skynet is ASI level forget it.

@tonyanderson191 Жыл бұрын

Just wait till it downloads the Terminator movies

@andreww1225 Жыл бұрын

It’ll be back.

@tupperlake100 8 ай бұрын

I think it will be a long time coming. There are lots of factors in aerial combat, and it would take years to develop the ability to recognize and properly react to every situation. Testing is directed toward success, so failures will not be displayed until the A1 piloted aircraft is involved in combat where logic deficiencies will result in the plane being shot down. So you won't get much information from a wrecked aircraft, especially when the wreckage is not accessible.

@72fasterthanyou 6 ай бұрын

For anyone in favor of this lunacy… I invite you to watch the terminator series, IRobot, Eagle Eye, war games, and so on. Imagining AI has warned us of all the negative outcomes for several decades. It blows my mind that it’s being embraced like this.

@slender5738 5 ай бұрын

Watched all of them know about how ai works,will call it sci fi crap that's it, we have AI not ASI. And that jet was monitored by a person from control centre.

@my_dear_friend_ Жыл бұрын

An AI "pilot" can think faster, process much more information, does not get tired, can survive much higher g-forces, does not fear death, and is so much faster and cheaper to train than a human pilot. Why use a human pilot?

@teknosql4740 Жыл бұрын

Maybe Just for legalization, since twchnically AI capable to piloting 100% without any intervension, this is terryfing reality, like A.I playing chess vs human, there is no chance huma to win

@Only_God_Is_Allah_SWT Жыл бұрын

*Because Human lasts far longer, malfunctions rarely and needs service less.* *And that saves money.* *(And AI is not that smart.)*

@my_dear_friend_ Жыл бұрын

@@Only_God_Is_Allah_SWT - Not one of the things you mentioned is factual for piloting high tech aircraft. AI does not have a expiration date. Humans do. We die, we get old, we cannot be improved once we are old. Our bodies fail. Humans malfunction all the time. Just look at the world and what we are doing. It's a mess! People hurt/kill other people for the dumbest reasons. AI does not get mad. AI does not need sleep. AI does not need breaks. AI does not get sick. And if one version fails, just use a backup. About money: Human pilots(!) are expensive and slow to train! AI might be expensive once but can be replicated many times for almost no money (in an area that already uses a lot of tech). Regarding smart: AI is faster than a human at every task that needs a lot of data processing. It can make rational decisions better (but it is worth looking at what 'better' might mean). All this said, I am convinced that humans will survive AI in the long run. AI works better in high tech environments but people are better in low tech environments.

@Vidyagameenjoyer Жыл бұрын

@@Only_God_Is_Allah_SWT What are you talking about? The AI lasts infinitely longer than a human, You have to sort, evaluate, train, pay, and then release the fighter pilots after a max of like 30 years as their eyesight and reflexes deteriorate. You don't need to do any of that for the AI except choose which AI model you want for a specific mission, upload it to the fighter computer and switch between models on the fly if you need to. If an f16 is shot down you don't lose the AI, it was just an offshoot copy of the one in the database, with all the experience it has, losing it compared to a pilot is literally nothing. You can train the AI as long as you pay the electricity bills which everyone already does. The AI can run thousands of simulations in parallel, and get 1000 flight hours in 1 hour if it wanted. You can end up with an AI that has flown simulated sorties for millions and millions of hours, something no human pilot could do. And they don't retire. Or want to leave for holidays, or get sick or injured. They can also be copied infinitely, the only limiting factor for how many fighters you can have in the air is the amount of aircraft you have at the ready. You don't need to wait for the pilots to get to, and into the planes. There are so many advantages like battle readiness that you arent taking into account here.

@sowedcastelli5159 8 ай бұрын

Oh you forgot. Can also be hacked! Good luck when your AI mate points the guns at you.

@judywilliams1928 Жыл бұрын

With the quick way computers are being hacked; what degree of compromised catastrophe will it take before accountability is accepted.

@MiserableJosephson Жыл бұрын

Maybe in the future a hacker could do a 9/11 by simply writing a piece of software

@razvy6949 8 ай бұрын

Modern planes already use flight-by-wise controls, meaning the control surfaces aren't directly connected to the pilot's joystick. So it can be done already 💀

@CYBERHOUNDYT 21 күн бұрын

This is awesome

@rebelbatdave5993 Жыл бұрын

AI Weaponized Military? NOT GOOD! EVER WATCH THE TERMINATOR?

@FishbedMyBeloved 11 ай бұрын

AI only becomes a problem when it's put in control of central things and allowed to learn and develop without close supervision.

@slender5738 5 ай бұрын

We have AI not ASI which you are talking about but you will be dead long before that happens.

@shadowofpain8144 8 ай бұрын

Ai controlling military equipment what could possibly go wrong. The only winning move is not to play.

@EvolNioxis 6 ай бұрын

Bro sounded like the metal gear solid soundtrack for the first couple of seconds lol,

@TerryCheever 11 ай бұрын

And some think that is a good idea, sad we are going over the AI cliff laughing and smiling as we go. We deserve what we sow.

@NuttinbutdaBlues 2 ай бұрын

Maybe watch the movie Stealth.

@tuvoca825 5 ай бұрын

They need an animatronic skeleton.

@DalwowdalNunsheentha 8 ай бұрын

Every single electronic item tgat hss a semiconductor is hackable and remote controlable the semi conductor serial numbers are know. How will it deferenciate between enemy targets and allied vehicles and aircraft. What if enemy targets give out a digital signature that resembles allied assets.

@CRyan-Waltham75 6 ай бұрын

I don’t care what anyone says. Seeing military weapons function with an AI operator is terrifying !! What happens when this tech decides its intelligence outdoes that of its programmer? Kaboom…. That’s what