Maratha Empire Family Tree | Hindu Dynasties

[@Adi-yw8qw]

As a Maharashtra-ian ( Marathi ) Person , I would really like to thank you for making this Video and providing the PDF of the Chart for free. My parents told me that our ancestors were in the Navy of Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, so this video means a lot me. Lot of love and Respect from Mumbai .

[@yogeshjog6072]

many interpretations prejudiced. (Some facts are wrong too) Eg. 5:49 u say "shahu maharaj became puppet of peshwas." No!!!! until he was alive 1749, peshwas were never superseding chatra-pati. It was only 1752-54 when peshwas instated their 1st puppet chatrapati (who was actually officially adopted n nominated by shahuji while he was alive.) Peshwas (nanasaheb to be precise 3rd of bhat peshwa ) could exert their power over throne, only cuz of internal feud occuring post shahuji chatrapati . Thanks to tara rani (who was not reigning queen at the feud time 1749-54 neither of kolhapur nor satara)

[@sujay1277]

@@yogeshjog6072 True

[@saswatidas1123]

Where is the pdf??please answer for an Indian

[@UsefulCharts]

Link is in the description.

[@yogeshjog6072]

@ferzy09 no buddy Shahu claims throne in 1707 , that time balaji visjwanath bhat is just a clerk of dhanaji jadhao(who became senapati of shahu) Bhat is made peshwa only in 1713. *So he has grown his prominence slowly from 1711* until then he is a very good servant to dhanaji son , but indirectly serving/showing skills to shahu. He was worthy of shahu's praise which gives jealousy to dhanaji jadhav son, n that's why all the drama upto him being peshwa in 1713 unfolds. He in his lifetime(1720), or his great warrior son bajirao in his lifetime(1740) *had no de facto power over cchatrapati shahu* All they had was absolute confidence of their master n relatively free hand(subject to smart checks n balances of shahu) to deal/expand as if they are rulers. N they both never dreamt of superseding shahu.

[@OddCompass]

Fantastic video! Glad to be involved in presenting Indian history to the world.

[@yogeshjog6072]

many interpretations prejudiced. (Some facts are wrong too) Eg. 5:49 u say "shahu maharaj became puppet of peshwas." No!!!! until he was alive 1749, peshwas were never superseding chatra-pati. It was only 1752-54 when peshwas instated their 1st puppet chatrapati (who was actually officially adopted n nominated by shahuji while he was alive.) Peshwas (nanasaheb to be precise 3rd of bhat peshwa ) could exert their power over throne, only cuz of internal feud occuring post shahuji chatrapati . Thanks to tara rani (who was not reigning queen at the feud time 1749-54 neither of kolhapur nor satara)

[@yogeshjog6072]

Went to ur channel cannot find vdo which is bout shahuji sharifji n Sufi

[@OddCompass]

@@yogeshjog6072 Hey Yogesh, I think you may have mistakenly replied to me instead of UsefulCharts.

[@yogeshjog6072]

@ferzy09 no boy.. shahu was never titular. Inactive militarily (like sambhaji shivaji rajaram maharaj was) but he never had a de facto ruler overpowering his authority as maratha king until he died. Will explain later in longer comment with exact relation of peshwa shahu with possibly reference links. With each of bhat peshwa 3 in his life.

[@yogeshjog6072]

@@OddCompass it's my view on this vdo sir. I wish it be read by many interested history lovers, so I paste in major threads.

[@kesharkhadkapunwar2029]

🚩Long live Chatrapati Maharaj Shivaji Bhosle🚩🚩🚩 🌹🌹🌹🙏 🇳🇵Love from Nepal !!!

[@abhishekpawar5126]

List of Marathi dynasties: Holkars of Indore Shindes of Gwalior Gaikwads of Baroda Bhonsales of Nagpur Pawars of Dhar Patwardhans of Phaltan Bhoites of Jalgaon Newalkars of Jhansi

[@nilekarmayur]

Peshwa dynasty

[@himanshugurjar9002]

@@nilekarmayur No, they were pretty much maratha dynasties

[@swatigawade5577]

Patwardhan...of Phaltan....what do u mean....what period of their ruling

[@CoolMan-ig1ol]

These were those who allied with british. Bhonsles of Tanjore or Those of Satara fought the british and lost.

[@itatube7594]

Shinde dynasty is still alive

[@lsgreger2645]

While in the Air Force, I was in Gwalior India for two weeks. We got to visit the Maharaja palace which is more of a museum now. They had a dining room with a silver liquor train that ran over the table. They had a two ton chandelier hanging in the ball room. The legend was that the Maharaja had two elephants walk on the ceiling to make sure it could hand the chandelier. It was amazing!

[@aakarshmaurya2265]

Where do you live sir ?

[@lsgreger2645]

@@aakarshmaurya2265 I live in North Dakota USA. I was in the USAF for 20 years and attended a Cope India at Gwalior AB India.

[@aakarshmaurya2265]

@yeh koi IMRANdi KHANa hai ?? Oh beti fauji fauji hota hai chahe wo yha ka ho ya mitra desh ka. Apne desh ke seniko ka samman zaroor karo aur dusre desho ke seniko ka bhi. Pakistan is an exception 😁. Ab Sir ka mtlb izzat se talve chaatna kab ho gya

[@CoolMan-ig1ol]

Still you can see the Maharajas of Gwalior, they made their palace a museum and now constructed a new palace...

[@avijnanganguly1245]

It's great to see doing Indian families. Love from India.

[@puneeths8205]

same

[@RajeevKumar-en4go]

Jai Maratha

[@yogeshjog6072]

many interpretations prejudiced. (Some facts are wrong too) Eg. 5:49 u say "shahu maharaj became puppet of peshwas." No!!!! until he was alive 1749, peshwas were never superseding chatra-pati. It was only 1752-54 when peshwas instated their 1st puppet chatrapati (who was actually officially adopted n nominated by shahuji while he was alive.) Peshwas (nanasaheb to be precise 3rd of bhat peshwa ) could exert their power over throne, only cuz of internal feud occuring post shahuji chatrapati . Thanks to tara rani (who was not reigning queen at the feud time 1749-54 neither of kolhapur nor satara)

[@pradhyumanrajawat7386]

Marathas has to be only empire which was caste neutral. All castes like Rajputs, Brahmins, Dalits etc came together to achieve Swaraj.

[@cyno002]

Castes comes when British rule start, it was Jaati and it is very different from cast.

[@adwaitnaravane5285]

That is not true. The Marathas after Balaji were really racist idiots. That's why so many other "hindu" kingdoms ended up supporting the Afghans instead of the Marathas who did not respect their independence.

[@abhishekpawar5126]

That was only true till Chhatrapati rule After Peshwas took over casteism touched new heights in the Maratha Empire

[@thematchless97]

@@abhishekpawar5126 lol. Brahmin bashing . 😂

[@thematchless97]

@@adwaitnaravane5285 u hate that peshwas took Maratha Empire to its zenith. So u want to descredit them only because they are Brahmins

[@RajeevKumar-en4go]

Happy to learn Maratha royal family tree by you 💙. This is also very useful for Indian competitive exams 😉. Love you from 🇮🇳🇮🇳

[@prasadm6238]

Thank you for making so informative video on Hindu Royals Dynasties...My ancestors were part of Maratha army for generations so this video meant a lot to me , we still have our ancestral home near Royal palace and Kings court also known as JUNA RAJWADA BHAWANI MANDAP here in Kolhapur... Lot of love and Respect from Kolhapur 🚩🚩🚩 Jay Bhawani Jay Shivaji 🚩🚩🚩

[@arandomyorkshireman9678]

Jack: Europe is connected to Asia. Me: laughs in British Isles

[@noahhhhhh8392]

*laughs in Iceland*

[@renshiwu305]

Britain and Ireland are on the continental shelf of Europe. Much as Long Island (and Greenland) are on the continental shelf of North America.

[@arandomyorkshireman9678]

We are still in Europe! Europe and EU are different!صلاح محمد الجعلي

[@boulevard14]

@@renshiwu305 Well done, very true.

[@neoscorpiooo]

British Isles are on the Eurasian tectonic plate but India has its own plate.

[@harshavardhana3895]

I Respect Marathi people . I am an tamizhan.

[@cr-mo1op]

As a Maratha n marathi we don't respect periyari tamizhan ricebags

[@riderchallenge4250]

@@cr-mo1op respect the cholas then

[@krushnaji4940]

We are Marathi but we are also Indian proud of Indian.

[@ashwinvk4124]

@@cr-mo1op periyar moment Tamil Nadu fought for the cast system

[@cr-mo1op]

@@ashwinvk4124 😂😂😂 that’s what your people say? He was British agent, anti Hindu n Google it what he said about Tamil language n what his followers did to Hindu gods. N we know what he did to his own foster child.

[@Crick1952]

Shivaji: Save, Maratha! Mughals: Why did you say that name!

[@greattimurempire7596]

Baburids great imperia

[@Noone-gz8li]

@@greattimurempire7596 mongols were defeated by Marathas

[@samimahmood5877]

@@Noone-gz8li marathas were defeated by british empire

[@dp28784u]

@@samimahmood5877 British Empire only defeated Marathas at the end, however most wars between the British and Maratha consisted of Maratha victories.

[@xitijthorat]

Sad to see that no one got your batman vs superman reference

[@abhishekverma7368]

I couldn't understand why few marathas faught for the throne, if they stayed united all the time India would have been something else. But thanks for explaining ❤️❤️

[@arjunbadi6038]

It's a bit sad that there was no mention of Rani Laxmibai but otherwise, great vid!

[@deepakdahiya9]

@Bricp she was also a maratha and part of maratha Confederacy.

[@deepakdahiya9]

@Bricp even peshwa bajirao, gawkawad of baroda, scindia of gwalior and holkar of indore were not descendants of Shivaji Maharaj. All these dynasties were part of Maratha Confederacy aka Maratha empire with Shivaji Maharaj's descendants at Satara as their nominal emperor.

[@Kendlelanisdairy-og_yt]

I am indian and watch every single one of your videos I was very happy when I saw u uploaded a indian royal dynasty

[@yogeshjog6072]

many interpretations prejudiced. (Some facts are wrong too) Eg. 5:49 u say "shahu maharaj became puppet of peshwas." No!!!! until he was alive 1749, peshwas were never superseding chatra-pati. It was only 1752-54 when peshwas instated their 1st puppet chatrapati (who was actually officially adopted n nominated by shahuji while he was alive.) Peshwas (nanasaheb to be precise 3rd of bhat peshwa ) could exert their power over throne, only cuz of internal feud occuring post shahuji chatrapati . Thanks to tara rani (who was not reigning queen at the feud time 1749-54 neither of kolhapur nor satara)

[@ganeshav2768]

Well presented , appreciate the effort to pronounce names properly. Kindly consider couple of points when updating the version : a) True India was a collection of kingdoms, but unlike Europe the kingdoms were bound by common civilisational ethos based on sanatana dharma. Hence any internecine wars wete more a territorial issue for kings and hence common people and their life were largely unaffected . b) Pluralism had never worried hindus, but the Islam's assault and forced conversion was not accepted. Marathas definitely stood for hindus and their culture , but as unique people in the world the hindu marathas like the hindu Vijayanagar before them , never oppressed or differentiated their subjects on religious grounds nor inflicted genocide on the enemy's people that the Islam and European colonial armies used to do C) it is not correct to term Mughals as tolerant to hindus. It is just the extent of resistance they faced that made them compromise and do with subtle aggression like jezia tax , buying out some enemies, fostering marriage based alliance etc. Ofcourse Aurangazeb carried out unabashed atrocity on hindus.

[@krishpatel3156]

He only said the early Mughals were more tolerant than the later ones. That's true.

[@Popperite]

The Indian monarchical titles were not done away with in 1947. They were abolished under PM Indira Ghandi. From 1947 the titles and honours (like the 21 gunshot salute) remained until then, but in 1947 the power of these monarchs was mostly done away with. There were a few exeptions. But not anymore.

[@ravivv1869]

Holkars of Indore, Bhosles of Nagpur and Bhosles of Thanjavur have not been covered at all in the so called Useful Charts.

[@Greatoscarrat]

I'm early for once! Just wanted to say, I have always loved how Usefulcharts covers a lot of history and family trees from all over the world and from many different cultures. It's good to see, and I wish we didn't have such Euro/white-centric history in the classroom.

[@Zach-mw5so]

The505Guys It’s not to say other countries’ histories aren’t important, or that we shouldn’t learn them. However it would be ludicrous to say that a “Eurocentric” point of view doesn’t make sense, given how the future USA was settled and developed by Europeans.

[@tsovloj6510]

@@Zach-mw5so That's a funny spin on "built on Native genocide and African slavery". Comments like this just prove the point that everything we teach our kids is filtered through a European lens.

[@Zach-mw5so]

TsovLoj Not even worth a debate with comments like that.

[@greattimurempire7596]

Baburids great Empire

[@o-o2399]

@@tsovloj6510 and they might want to learn there own european history

[@subliminal3334]

My ancesters are from holkars, was one of the state in maratha empire. You didn't added them in chart 😁

[@yogeshjog6072]

many interpretations prejudiced. (Some facts are wrong too) Eg. 5:49 u say "shahu maharaj became puppet of peshwas." No!!!! until he was alive 1749, peshwas were never superseding chatra-pati. It was only 1752-54 when peshwas instated their 1st puppet chatrapati (who was actually officially adopted n nominated by shahuji while he was alive.) Peshwas (nanasaheb to be precise 3rd of bhat peshwa ) could exert their power over throne, only cuz of internal feud occuring post shahuji chatrapati . Thanks to tara rani (who was not reigning queen at the feud time 1749-54 neither of kolhapur nor satara)

[@wwemusicworld3837]

Yeah holkars ruled indore

[@subliminal3334]

@Rupesh Thakare tera baap deshdrohi

[@--2128]

Yes🙏👍👍👍👍😄

[@--2128]

@Rushabh Thakare.Thakur Kon desh drohi

[@arcisvar4863]

Hey, You should definitely make a video on the Nepali royal dynastys Shahs being the kings and Ranas being a hereditary prime Minister dyanasty. You should also include the 3 malla dynasties that ruled Kathmandu before the Gurkha Shahs took over. It would be a really interesting video. The royal family ended in 2007 but really in 2000 when the royal massacre happened. Please reply if you plan to make a video. I'll email you useful information and details. Thanks 😊 🙏 😊

[@dashanan_ravan4443]

Ranas of nepal also migrated frm mewar

[@AdityaKadamMechanical]

1 mistake: India was unified 2 times only under 1 ruler but idea of 1 India is very old. That's the reason 1 of our 2 epics is Mahabharat. Meaning great india. Culturally & by our values & traditions bases we were always 1. Rest liked the lecture a lot❤️😘👌🏼

[@shaileshshilwant2316]

Very detailed and most updated version till date....... Great job !! Love and respect from Pune ( De Facto capital of Maratha Empire !!)

[@yogeshjog6072]

many interpretations prejudiced. (Some facts are wrong too) Eg. 5:49 u say "shahu maharaj became puppet of peshwas." No!!!! until he was alive 1749, peshwas were never superseding chatra-pati. It was only 1752-54 when peshwas instated their 1st puppet chatrapati (who was actually officially adopted n nominated by shahuji while he was alive.) Peshwas (nanasaheb to be precise 3rd of bhat peshwa ) could exert their power over throne, only cuz of internal feud occuring post shahuji chatrapati . Thanks to tara rani (who was not reigning queen at the feud time 1749-54 neither of kolhapur nor satara)

[@OnlineMirdha]

I think Holkars were also the part of maratha dynasty you missed them 😊

[@pankajkumarswain4855]

Holkars are not Maratha by Caste.

[@vijaychougale4211]

@@pankajkumarswain4855 there was nothing like maratha as a cast.. it was made up to divide forces during british occupation. As for Holkar family, Malharrao holkar was originally from place near pune region (होळ). And he was part of Maratha empire. Most important one leading northen expansion.

[@pandit_thanos5135]

Peswa-maratha Shinde-kunbi Holkar-dhangar

[@darshankalje]

@@pandit_thanos5135 peshwa were bramhin and shinde and holkars were maratha

[@darshankalje]

@@pankajkumarswain4855 holkars are maratha bro

[@stormerthe2nd]

A slave from Africa Became a King in India In his army was a Sardar Whose Grandson initiated an Empire An Empire that later ruled the whole of India This is so fascinating ❤

[@swatigawade5577]

Greatest comment.

[@St0ic_p3rsp3ctives]

Fun fact : Bajirao's son Shamsher Bahadur was a muslim because his mother came from a muslim family and he was born before their marriage so the people did not recognise his legitimacy ,his original name was to be krishna but instead he became Shamsher Bahadur

[@ahmeddf97]

It's not fun fact, Infact you are trying to hurt Muslims sensitive. Shameful hindu politics.

[@sohail7796]

@@ahmeddf97 how is that disrespectful if anything this shows how many indian ruler were secular and were fighting against religious discrimination

[@muraligopal212]

Abhishek Raj Mastani, Bajirao's 2nd wife was born to a Hindu rajput Raja and his persian concubine.

[@arcisvar4863]

@@muraligopal212 she wasn't Persians just a Muslim from ganges plains decedent of a persio-turk family that settled in north India.

[@shariqshaikh8054]

Then why didn't you make this Chart before ........if you have degdeep facts about the same....

[@ala7515]

Thank you very much UsefulCharts! Your team is doing very informative work. Schools in India (and the world) would be happy to have you as their history teacher.

[@otomackena7610]

i dont see you mentioning Christian nationalist or Islamist/muslim nationalist in any of your video about Muslims or Christian empires nor have i seen you mention ethnonalionalist then how is "Hindu nationalist" relevant to this?

[@pranavingale6850]

Typical westerner

[@mansikadam3243]

Quiet a good research, being a maratha loved it personally

[@helloji9662]

Yeah ..bhari video ahe..pn he log mahabhart time cha United bharat mention ka kart nahit

[@bestclips4525]

Lol that's why I hate em maratha is cast and all cast help him to build empire but in return they get shit and only one racing cast takes credit

[@helloji9662]

@@bestclips4525 before Shivaji maharaj , their was no marathi caste, people used to say that but in history their was not a single time mentioned about Maratha name . And about saint and educational base , saint dnyaneshwar ,to saint aknath spirtual books ,in that book all caste mentioned except Maratha. Maratha is like a battalion , fighter caste .even tho not all todays Maratha did not participate as a mawala with ahivaji maharaj , few of them ,in that area with CH shivaji maharaj

[@PATRICX2000]

@@bestclips4525 par chutiye Tumhe kuch pata nahi hai maratha sena mein ladhne wale 80% jawan farmer the jo aaj maratha hai Farmers.. 20 percent baki caste thi Jisme baki kam karne wale the

[@stever2608]

Holkar, Tanjaur Bhosale are missing. Holkar were equally important to Shinde and more prominent than Gaekwads of Baroda.

[@AnaisApparels]

We are the bhosale of Thanjavur clans but we don't know our history now

[@vishankbharda9433]

There is an error on the chart Venkoji is shown as Shahaji's brother, he is not. He is Shahaji's son from his other wife Tukabai and he is Shivaji's half brother

[@yogeshjog6072]

many interpretations prejudiced. (Some facts are wrong too) Eg. 5:49 u say "shahu maharaj became puppet of peshwas." No!!!! until he was alive 1749, peshwas were never superseding chatra-pati. It was only 1752-54 when peshwas instated their 1st puppet chatrapati (who was actually officially adopted n nominated by shahuji while he was alive.) Peshwas (nanasaheb to be precise 3rd of bhat peshwa ) could exert their power over throne, only cuz of internal feud occuring post shahuji chatrapati . Thanks to tara rani (who was not reigning queen at the feud time 1749-54 neither of kolhapur nor satara)

[@cs-mi8ur]

@@yogeshjog6072 no offence,but the Peshwa and generals run the show since the 2nd Peshwa.

[@yogeshjog6072]

Paste- Shahu claims throne in 1707 , that time balaji visjwanath bhat is just a clerk of dhanaji jadhao(who became senapati of shahu) Bhat is made peshwa only in 1713. *So he has grown his prominence slowly from 1711* until then he is a very good servant to dhanaji son , but indirectly serving/showing skills to shahu. He was worthy of shahu's praise which gives jealousy to dhanaji jadhav son, n that's why all the drama upto him being peshwa in 1713 unfolds. He in his lifetime(1720), or his great warrior son bajirao in his lifetime(1740) *had no de facto power over cchatrapati shahu* All they had was absolute confidence of their master n relatively free hand(subject to smart checks n balances of shahu) to deal/expand as if they are rulers. N they both never dreamt of superseding shahu.

[@yogeshjog6072]

@@cs-mi8ur no offence taken bro. Yes they run the show from 3rd bhat peshwa. But Surely not second. I've pasted detailed comment no 2. Hope u read. I can also narrate u another incidence, where peshwa 3 and bhosale of nagpur come at cross at ganga river over who is authority to revenue collections in Bengal. Where *shahu grants east (orrisaa Bengal) to nagpur bhosale* circa 1745-50. (Gotta read for exact dates, and exact episode again.) And *peshwa since then keeps away from Bengal* (even after shahu dies further peshwas n pune *never cross nagpur rights in east* .)

[@deepakpradhan9904]

Just Imagine brother what happened if Shambhaji shahaji Bhosle and Shambhaji maharaj completed their term , I think Bhosle Dynasty had more Fame in history .

[@anoldsouldwanderer1461]

Point of Information: Yuvraj Sambhajiraje Chatrapati is the current Chatrapati of the Kolhapur branch, he is an Indian politician with the BJP who served as the member in the upper house of the Parliament of India.

[@PatilAdi]

2:54 the “claim” was actually quite legitimate and was proven from the records of the earlier Bahamani Sultanate, where Shivaji’s ancestors(Sisodiyas) served and got fiefs.. the same Sisodiyas later became the clan of Bhosales along with a sub-clan called Ghorpades. This claim was bolstered when the complete lineage from Bahamani times to the previous times was traced and Coronation of Shivaji Maharaj took place

[@PatilAdi]

@Rupesh Thakare yes

[@faisalkhan-kr9qf]

Absolutely right

[@zorathus2229]

Fake lol shivaji maharaj was kurmi. 96 kuli itself came after original marathas. First all were known as mawalas. Sisodiya rajput ka claim liya tha but wasn't rajput and moreover history of shivaji maharaj is written far later after the 2nd coronation 🤣🤣🤣

[@cg8397]

@@zorathus2229 Correct, that is the reason why Marathas got put in Reservation category in Maharashtra in 2019. Marathas are not Kshatriya Varna but Shudra Varna. The fake genealogy was created for Shivaji because the Chhatrapati religious ceremony can be done only for Kshatriyas, also Sisodia family were the only Rajputs who didn't intermarry with the Mughals.

[@swatigawade5577]

Yes.

[@positivelyprecious5116]

Please do videos of 1. Ranas and Shumshers of Nepal..!!!! 2. Shah Dynasty of Nepal

[@amar_mohite_007]

Love From India-Maharashtra n Maratha Family 👍 Gud Work

[@IndianBoy77]

Thank you for the information, just noticed at 08:25 the years mentioned below Baji Rao (1720-1740) is his reign, and at 09:55 Madhav Rao(1774-95) his lifespan is given

[@sarangawasthi4190]

Bcoz Madhavrao was given Peshwai at 40th day of his birth and he reigned till hi death.

[@SciPastGeo]

THE GREAT MARATHA

[@guitaristut]

You should do a family tree on Vanderbilt's! They have many modern interesting descendents like Anderson Cooper and Timothy Oliphant

[@techgig9079]

Can you also look at some more south indian dynasties. Like vijayanagara, wodeyars, chola, kittur etc...? It's a real delight to know the history from your charts.

[@nitindalvi5415]

My ancestors came from Parmar Dynasty ( Rajasthan). Brought to Mumbai by King Bimb of Mumbai in 3rd AD as soldiers.Later fought for Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj against Mughals.Our surname was Dalpati. Chatrapati renamed our new surname as Dalvi for a bravery in a battlefield. Today our caste family is known as Shatriya Chaukalshi Samaj.

[@SirTornado2]

The royal titles were abolished in 1971. So, technically from 1947 to 1971, they were the equivalent of mediatised houses

[@marcc375]

Hey guys! Would you maybe get into the dynasties of the states in the Holy Roman Empire and subsequently the German Emprire? I think it would be a lot of fun to see all the connections, since there were quite a few of them. BTW I had the east and west European charts framed and hanged on my wall for my birthday. I love them a lot. Keep up the good work! A Hungarian from Germany

[@ladyjanegrey1671]

As an American-Born Marathi, I'm happy to learn about Marathi history other than Shivaji and Bajirao

[@dextor0000]

Its amazing how foreigners are slowing showing interest in Indian history..............just like we Indians were studying napolean, bismark, russian tzars and Hitler till now.

[@dextor0000]

@General Zorawar Singh yes they do ...we studied them in history ww2 chapter

[@ssm7593]

@General Zorawar Singh CBSE class 10th

[@shantanukhandkar]

Technically, Madhavrao Scindia's mother is from a Nepali noble house, but not the royal house. The Rana dynasty were hereditary Prime Ministers during the Nepali monarchy era. The royal house was the Shah dynasty.

[@TheCalcutta23]

Very interesting but you missed the Maharaja HOLKAR of Indore.. One of largest Maratha Princely State..

[@AntarikshRajkonwar]

UsefulCharts, I think you should also make a video on 'Ahom Dynasty' who ruled Assam (an Indian state) for continuous 598 years as independent and another 5 years as a princely state under British Raj and defeated Mughal empire 17 times despite being small in number of military. The founder and first king 'Sukapha' and the General 'Lachit Borphukan' who defeated Mughals are highly regarded in the state of Assam and now in India as well. So Usefulcharts you should have a look on this impressive dynasty. (28/8/22 3:07pm)

[@aryanbhosale2558]

Great to explained this chart very well with the details of Maratha and Peshwa families with the ruling period.

[@mcfcfan1870]

Next could you maybe do a family tree of Irish High Kings? It would be a tough one to do as the high kings would come from many different houses (clans). Its also tough to know when the Irish monarchy started so it would be easiest to big somewhere like 6th century or 8th century or whatever.

[@mcfcfan1870]

Just to add.... Ireland WAS a single nation back then contrary to one of your previous vidoes, there was a single high king, a single language, culture and religion, A single law, And the Irish identity in Ireland back then. Only thing is the system was very strange and unique to otehr counties. Simply explained.... At the top of the pyramid was the "Brehon Law". The laws of Ireland. No-one could change the laws and they were in place for hundreds and hundreds of years. Then was the High King, he had little to no proven power but nonethless was the most powerful person. Then was the four petty kings who ruled their small regions under the high kings, there was occasionally infighting between these kings and the high king was also one of these four regional kings. Then there was the cheiftans of the clans, there were many clans with the petty king of the region being part of the most powerful clan in his region. These clans often infought with each other to become more powerful. It was a very strange amd complicated system so I wouldn't expect that in the possible video at all but its just to explain.

[@AmiableARK_ahmedrazakhanYT]

Thankyou So much for the PDF! I Can’t imagine people like you still exist! I am admirer of English and one day will start my own historic company!

[@abhijeetshinde506]

Best video.. Thanks for the great information 👍 Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj ki jay ❤️

[@dictatoraladeen5717]

Sad to see this coming from a foreigner rather than our own people.. Kudos to you mate good work 👍

[@7adiyo]

Hey Jack and OddCompass. Great video!

[@phoenixlegend2921]

Jack Rackham my god what a surprise , keep up the good work in your channel, i really enjoy it

[@shantanukhandkar]

As far as the family tree of the Bhosle dynasty is concerned, the video is absolutely correct when speaking of the process of adoption. There is a litany of situations where uncles adopt their nephews, ie their sister's son. This would also bring prominence to the family that the sister was married into. Some were even descendants of Shivaji's granduncle. There is a palace called the New Palace in Kolhapur where the Bhosle family still lives but the entire ground floor has been converted into a museum. There one can see the family tree in its entirety. It is so long and convoluted that it will make your head spin!

[@yogeshjog6072]

many interpretations prejudiced. (Some facts are wrong too) Eg. 5:49 u say "shahu maharaj became puppet of peshwas." No!!!! until he was alive 1749, peshwas were never superseding chatra-pati. It was only 1752-54 when peshwas instated their 1st puppet chatrapati (who was actually officially adopted n nominated by shahuji while he was alive.) Peshwas (nanasaheb to be precise 3rd of bhat peshwa ) could exert their power over throne, only cuz of internal feud occuring post shahuji chatrapati . Thanks to tara rani (who was not reigning queen at the feud time 1749-54 neither of kolhapur nor satara)

[@Adnankhan-hs4lq]

First time a channel so interesting and amazing . I did right away subscribed without any second thought Outstanding research and very good and the explanation is such that even a kid can understand it perfectly. Hatsoff to the channel owner . Please keep bringing such interesting topics.

[@rajivnair5730]

Great ! Was looking for this clarity.

[@dheerajshinde7829]

Dheeraj Shinde , I Live Today In Sangli My Ancestry Tree Goes Back From Gwalior Madhya Pradesh To Kanerkhed Satara Maharashtra I noticed this During The ( वौंशावळ) In my family tree they were In the Leading troops With Mahadji Shinde During Panipat War After One Of My Great Great Great Great Great Grandfathers who was martyred in the war The Family was Sent Back to Kanerkhed With Patilki For 2-3 Generations Later The Son Of my great great great great great grandfather Along With Mahadji Shinde With Sardarki They freed Shah Alam From Britishers and Captured Dehli And Made Shah Alam King Again As the time passed by we moved to Bhose and then to Sangli Maharashtra The family Ancestry tree and the Information is still intact with us I'm Proud that My Ancestors share a bit of Great History On back of our generation In Order To Expand the maratha empire Along With Peshwas . हर हर महादेव 🚩

[@trashvideoboi1220]

Him it’s interesting seeing a family tree from where my ancestors come I’ve seen a huge amount of skeleton lake (insert Indian race here) worshipers links so that’s interesting

[@djk10mumbai33]

Thank you so much for this video Lot of respect...Ek Maratha Lakh Maratha...🚩🚩🚩

[@GauravSingh-cg3zp]

Please Work towards being a Hindu and don't divide yourself with caste and creed.

[@infinityeducation1116]

Tq for uploading free PDF 😊

[@pathfinder1540]

Are Holkars of Indore not part of maratha/shivaji dynasty like scindia and gaikwad

[@RajputTsar]

4:00 Wow nostalgia, Only 15th century Kids will remember

[@ThisGuyCarlo]

Do a video of the Monarchs of Sicily (The Norman Sicilian Kings, the Holy Roman Rulers, The Spanish Monarchs of Sicily & the Bourbon Monarchs)

[@deepalib3096]

maratha tree given so much in detail! Nice

[@er.sumitholkar6541]

You missed Holkar dynasty of indore in your video...

[@kuldeepgaurav1419]

A suggestion, if I may. Do not do a video on Solar and Lunar dynasties for the reason that most probably you will get it wrong for there are more than 100 versions of it. I will suggest that you first try to understand the cultural differences and understand that History in India is not understood and applied as is understood by Western development and hence 'History' is different from 'Itihasa' (the preferred translation), however in exactitude the better word would be 'Bhoot' which translates as 'Past' since the concepts are entirely different. Marathas are fine, being nearer in History, but since even Indians are unsure of the right version of the claimed Solar and Lunar dynasties you certainly won't be able to figure it out and hence i would suggest you to not pursue it.

[@UsefulCharts]

I will mostly be looking at the family tree of the characters from the Mahabharata and Ramayana, not trying to build a complete historical tree. In these videos, I just explain the family tree rather than do historical analysis.

[@kuldeepgaurav1419]

@@UsefulCharts Thank you for clearing that up. It should be relatively easier for the lineage of Major characters of these texts are mentioned in the texts themselves as opposed to the mammoth task which I thought you were to undertake. However, there is another catch. The dates that are proposed for the events of these texts are under contention and rightly so and therefore you will have to navigate around that problem or use a disclaimer. I wish you good luck. And good job with this video. Thank You.

[@UsefulCharts]

@@kuldeepgaurav1419 Thanks. Will probably just avoid dates altogether.

[@KRSingh-eh6jp]

@@kuldeepgaurav1419 You are right about it.

[@gunadityapatil5009]

@@UsefulCharts I agree ..... And plus u could spiritually hurt some people..... With rebirth or not a big issue in Indian Mythology

[@nileshbhuta4474]

Great Charting for Knowledge and understanding of history Jai Hind Jai Maharashtra

[@UNisOUTDATED]

Very nicely elaborated. Not much is known about Shahaji (Ch. Shivaji's father) except that he was a Sardar in Malik Ambar's Court. Will look forward to the Solar (Suryavansh) & Lunar (Chandravansh) blood lines to test how various literatures portray them. The Peshwas expanded the Maratha empire for nearly 100 years however very little info is published (except a few good books) so will welcome anything on this front too.

[@yogeshjog6072]

many interpretations prejudiced. (Some facts are wrong too) Eg. 5:49 u say "shahu maharaj became puppet of peshwas." No!!!! until he was alive 1749, peshwas were never superseding chatra-pati. It was only 1752-54 when peshwas instated their 1st puppet chatrapati (who was actually officially adopted n nominated by shahuji while he was alive.) Peshwas (nanasaheb to be precise 3rd of bhat peshwa ) could exert their power over throne, only cuz of internal feud occuring post shahuji chatrapati . Thanks to tara rani (who was not reigning queen at the feud time 1749-54 neither of kolhapur nor satara)

[@gamingwith2619]

Marathas, Gupta, Ashoka, Maurya, Harsha💪 pride of India.

[@kapilbhati7179]

So where are gehlots rana sisodiya chandel bundel kalchuri parmar rajput katoch porus gaur sen kshatriya rajputra chauhan solanki chalukya rajput and prathihar rajputs

[@TheSandyKale]

Great video. Do you have the sources referenced where the Bhosale Dynasty claimed to have descended from the Sisodia Rajput Dynasty? Also, the term Hindu nationalist has a very negative connotation in India and is used by the left to perpetuate falsehoods about Hindus. Probably best to leave it out in any future videos relating to India.

[@Rohitman1899]

Wonderful Job🔥❤️❤️, Love from a Maratha❤️🔥

[@177abhijeettanpure5]

Being Maratha I love you provided pdf and you have done great worked Jai shivray 🚩🚩

[@parthkharade4583]

My grandmother is from bhosale family ❤️❤️ and my grandfather from jijamata's family side ❤️❤️

[@AnaisApparels]

Where are you from

[@Maitreya-7777]

Jyotiraditya Sindia is currently Airport and airlines minister currently in BJP.

[@digamberchigare7362]

You missed Bhosale's of Tanjavar and another maratha Confederacy Holkar's of Indore.

[@digamberchigare7362]

@Rupesh Thakare Lol.... descendant of "Anaji"claiming to be Kshyatriya...😂😂😂

[@kaustubhdongare_xrose_ao1362]

@Rushabh Thakare. kahi Pan Naka Bolu

[@laxmikanthrao8600]

Chatrapathi does not mean " the umbrella ruler". "Chatrpathi" is a distorted form of " Kshetra pathi". "Kshetra"= land, land mass, area etc " Pathi"= lord, owner, In india a king (Raaja) is also called as " Bhoopathi" here bhoo means again land.

[@FilesdocumentsAndreposit-kr3vb]

Bhoopati - lord of Lands

[@thomasdixon4373]

Awesome vid, you should do a vid of a series of vids about all the current pretenders in the world

[@smorcrux426]

its great to see you colab with jack rackam. Will he upload anything to his chanel as a collaboration?

[@UsefulCharts]

In addition to having his own channel, Jack actually works for UsefulCharts as a second narrator. He's done lots of videos here :)

[@aryanjadhavrao5786]

It is true that Deccan is know for its cross-religion diversity. I'm a Maratha, clan-Jadhavrao/Jadhavrav from Western Maharashtra, My maternal Grandmother is from the Suryavanshi Clan from Wai, Maharashtra, it was a ritual in their family to pay homage to Sufi Shrines. Family Havelis (Wada, like Shanivar Wada in Pune(Kokansatha/Chitpavan) ) have long been abandoned but the spirit still continues till this day!

[@tanmaydthakur]

Great work! Looking forward for more

[@noname13years62]

Jyotiraditya Scindhia is really a very well versed politician . I supported him when he was with congress , I support him now as well.

[@adisura9904]

There is a bit of inaccuracy. Early and later mughal rule was pretty brutal, only Akbar, jahangir and shah jahan to some extent were considered somewhat tolerant, further the earlier Islamic sultante was along with nearly all of early islamic invasions were quite horrific as well. Some say it was the bloodiest of invasions.

[@contryface3429]

Maratha Empire was founded by great shri Chhatrapati shivaji maharaj from the scratch. Then kept on expanding for next 150 years and spread all over India. The unique feature of this Empire was unlike other Indian Empires it was not run by any unique family. Those who had the capability to prove got good opportunities to hold different positions in this Empire. Hence there are a number of big names from different clans from Maharashtra those appear in the Marathas history. Shinde s ( schindhia s ) , holkars , gaykawads , Pawar's from Maharashtra s heart land got good opportunities under the leadership of peshwas and they were assigned separate territories in the north india, Bhosale s in East - nagpur . Nagpurkar Bhosale s had their territories extended up bengal and oddisha. Rani laxmi bai was from the tambe Maharashtrian royal family from banaras and was married to the Maratha king of Jhansi. In short there are a number of big names in maratha history who are not directly connected to Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj family.

[@sandeepgothriwal225]

Excellent video..... happy to see a video on indian rulers

[@kesharkhadkapunwar2029]

Useful charts--, 👏🌹🙏 Thanks!!, the video is beautifully done!! 🇳🇵Love from Nepal !!!

[@arnavthesceintist1149]

Thanks for this video. I am a Maharashtrain. Means so much to me

[@rajumani8773]

Valuable contribution to Indian History, Maratha Empire. This land is called the land of gold. Thank you Sir.

[@atishligade4716]

Thank You For this Video ❤️ My grandfather told me we were from *Shinde* dynasty who settle in South part of Maharashtra near Solapur. Earlier our surname was also *Shinde* but eventually changed to *Ligade* . Though people in our area still use *Sardar* before our name.

[@RohitDeshmukhrd]

solar dynasty means suryavanshi and lunar means somavanshi ❤️

[@PristinePerceptions]

Somavanshi aka chandravanshi. Both names are used.

[@dawnglianapachuau6433]

Heard about Jyotiraditya royal connection for the first time.

[@ashishdudhe8614]

Great to know about Maratha dynasty. Studious presentation 👍

[@ujjwal78]

please make video on Maurya Empire....❤ frm india

[@universe12e]

What are you talking hindu nationalists ,it sounds like contemptuous towards hindus.

[@r.b.8018]

Propaganda is spread this way. They use little terms or comments like Shivaji lied abt being Suryavanshi. Or like Mughals didn’t despise Hindus n killed millions. They make videos not to entertain or to earn money. A Nexus is behind all these. . . They won’t say it took Marathas to take back India from Mughals in 23 yrs when the Islamic rulers took 600 yrs to accomplish what they did at the height of Aurangzeb reign and that too it was never united. There were fight and skirmish happening everywhere. Like in kings of Kashmir or Ahoms of Assam. And they begin with the wrong Indian map. And u see not one person has objected in the comment section! This is how distorted map of India is normalised.

[@nikhilsingh6759]

he is

[@junaidkhan-vz5br]

@@r.b.8018 there is a nexus behind wahh re bhakt properly a sanghi nexus wearing chadhi with a brown ass.

[@raghurajsubedaar2747]

you didn't mention HOLKARS of INDORE and BHONSLES OF NAGPUR. There royalty and lineage is still going on , although they are not in politics.

[@vinayakjambhekar1339]

Very useful Video ...shows deep effort and study .even small things have not been skipped.....

[@matthiasdvorsakhillebrand2393]

Maybe you could cover more Indian dynasties? Perhaps from specific regions? Say for example family tree of the rulers of Malwa, or Assam, or Gujarat, or Rajasthan, or Odisha, or perhaps of a southern Indian region such as Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, or Kerala. Lots of dynasties to cover in those regions

[@sunilsatawlekar3972]

Nicely explained a complicated history of a few centuries in a compact chart form. Thanks!

[@dCash117]

Are there any native American family trees on record that you could do videos on?

[@UsefulCharts]

I'd really like to do one but I don't know of any that go back far. If anyone has any suggestions, I'd love to hear them.

[@stormveil]

There are some Aztec and Mayan records - that Useful Charts already has videos on. Basically same thing, different continent.

[@iustinianoantalazar5021]

@@UsefulCharts I have an suggestion! Not! Not is "Romanian monarchs family tree". When you want to make this video, make it. I have a suggestion to a royal family tree from South America. Inca emperors family tree, if you want!

[@medvisonstudyabroad5577]

As you began the video seen india United twice in history once in Mourya empire and other one is Gupta Empire But later on video you might forget about HOLKAR dynasty ....or CLAN from which belongs to Chandragupta mourya , Ashoka , Etc 🙏

[@sarveshbhusari8963]

Wow , Also foreigner also know about Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj 🚩🚩 , proud to be Maharashtrian .