You present this in such a way that even the most evangelical christian couldn't be upset.
@Robespierre-lI6 ай бұрын
Hey Matt ... A little tip from the world of archeology. Around 17.40 you report correctly that the Israelites were amost certainly Cainnanites. But you might want to look at the research that discovered Hebrew names written on artifacts in the Nile River valley from the mate bronze age.
@videopompano49356 ай бұрын
I forgot is useful craft a Christian or not?
@DanielHarten-vr5qv5 ай бұрын
Great video, but I think it's important to mention that the Madai were essentially Persians from Persia, where the three Magi who visited the Christ child originated.
@321ssteeeeeve5 ай бұрын
@@joshuataylor3550 Rather, managed to present recorded history from a chart representation as accurate as possible, in such a way appropriate to a fundamentalist standpoint either that of a Christian, Jew, or a Muslim.
@principleswise97493 ай бұрын
*As a born again Christian I really appreciate your detailed study about the cousins of Jesus Christ and the different Mary'es of that time. No matter how many times I studied these subjects in the past I always came out a bit confused.*
@sdastoryteller33816 ай бұрын
Whooo! I just bought the old Chart for super Cheap at the store. thanks for your hard work dude!
@marilynwithana63903 күн бұрын
Hilarious! All BS.
@shirleytrenche78526 ай бұрын
NO INTRO SONG? That’s my jam 😂
@UsefulCharts6 ай бұрын
Doo Doo doo-doo-doo doo......
@dhuratadobbins30014 ай бұрын
I know right!!!
@jessicarose21023 ай бұрын
Im a mixed Irish/Ashkenazi/Roma person, my ancestors can be traced from northern India through the middle east, then up through North Africa and into Europe and eventually up into Russia and then down into Wales and Ireland...also some Germany, Sinti/Roma. So I like listening to you because it can trace my peoples migration. Im several generations American and no longer practicing of any religion due to the World Wars, but your video helped me make connections to my cultural past.
@OrchestrationOnline6 ай бұрын
"Aw what a cute kitty! What's his name?" "He's Zerubbabel." "I know he's rubbable, but what's his name?"
@chimera98186 ай бұрын
It means seed of Babylon
@OrchestrationOnline6 ай бұрын
@@chimera9818 Yeah no kidding,.
@sphenodon20166 ай бұрын
I just love this channel. Matt has, almost singlehandedly, revived my interest in religion, and has fuethered my interest in history. It's really cool to see that history is more interesting than fiction in many instances
@joshuakatherine62515 ай бұрын
It's also interesting to see that history IS fiction in many instances
@tresvantolaidelawal5953 ай бұрын
@@joshuakatherine6251 one day, some generations may claim your existence is a fiction because sooner or later, we will all become history and AI will be the one defining you to others. Whatever lies people feed AI online now, will be the new truth for generations and guess what? The cycle of barbarism and endless wars that our ancestors solved and helped our generation to avoid will be brought back in the coming generations if we keep going like this. God help us all.
@principleswise97493 ай бұрын
*Same here! We don't need to look to an imaginary virtual future, to enjoy the excitement of fiction, when there's so much excitement to be discovered in history if you look at its so many amazing details!😍*
@ericbitzer52473 ай бұрын
@@joshuakatherine6251 History and science are fiction in many cases.
@ericbitzer52473 ай бұрын
@@joshuakatherine6251 Looks like my comment disappeared again.
@magicalambience95383 ай бұрын
I just found your videos today and wanted to thank you for such a great presentation and tell you what a great thing! Thank you again...
@jovialbivouacker993 ай бұрын
Again, thank you for your objective story telling with your charts and pleasant narration.🙂
@thomasdixon43736 ай бұрын
Amazing video Matt, I love the depth you go into with your information and research
@kennedybunga3996 ай бұрын
I am going to salute you for such an excellent job well done.
@andrewye11606 ай бұрын
It’s highly informative. As a Christian, I believe that it’s good to listen to the academic perspective on Bible. Thank you.🙏
@historyfan464 ай бұрын
I've been watching your channel for a while, and I enjoy your videos!
@catebligh6 ай бұрын
For the baby names alone! Great chart and video!
@ulrike99786 ай бұрын
The first half is so interesting to me, right after reading Cline´s book on the aftermath of the late bronze age collapse in the region (titled After 1177 BC), because you can kind of see where the archaeological record lines up with the biblical stories (and where it doesn´t). Highly recommend that book, by the way!
@dimitrosskrippka21546 ай бұрын
I think Enoch should be somehow marked as well as he was an important character for some authors
@matthewsatalic77673 ай бұрын
Well Jesus himself quoted Enoch so it should be there.
@mushtaqmasih2 ай бұрын
Enoch is Prophet and author of Book of Enoch
@DeplorablesGarbage2 ай бұрын
@@mushtaqmasih The Book of Enoch, also known as 1 Enoch, is an ancient Jewish apocalyptic text traditionally attributed to Enoch, the great-grandfather of Noah. However, it is important to note that the authorship of the Book of Enoch is not definitively established, and scholars generally believe that it was composed by multiple authors over several centuries. ### Key Points About the Book of Enoch: 1. Composition: The Book of Enoch is thought to have been written between the 3rd century BCE and the 1st century CE. It is divided into several sections, including: - The Book of Watchers - The Book of Parables - The Astronomical Book - The Book of Dream Visions - The Epistle of Enoch 2. Attribution to Enoch: The text is named after Enoch, building on the biblical figure mentioned in Genesis (Genesis 5:21-24), who "walked with God" and was taken by God. The attribution to Enoch serves to give the text a sense of authority and legitimacy. 3. Historical Context: The Book of Enoch reflects the beliefs, traditions, and concerns of Jewish communities during the Second Temple period. It deals with themes such as divine judgment, the fate of sinners, the coming of a messianic kingdom, and the nature of angels. 4. Canonical Status: The Book of Enoch is not considered canonical by most branches of Judaism or Christianity. However, it is regarded as an important work in the study of early Jewish thought and is cited in some early Christian writings. 5. Survival and Influence: The Book of Enoch was preserved primarily in the Ge'ez language (an ancient Ethiopian language) and is part of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church's biblical canon. It has influenced various religious traditions and has garnered interest in modern scholarship regarding apocalyptic literature. In summary, while the Book of Enoch is attributed to Enoch, it is unlikely that a single individual authored it. Instead, it is a composite work reflecting a range of ideas and traditions from ancient Jewish thought.
@jenniferspinks7069Ай бұрын
My husband has Enoch in his family. I've traced it back on his tree.
@SaulBadman-wb5ktАй бұрын
@@jenniferspinks7069it isn’t really a big deal since we all are related to Noah
@TheMelodicMess5 ай бұрын
Awesome as always, Matt. Is it sad that I wish the video were longer? Lol
@botanozsan78436 ай бұрын
Just amazing work! Thank you
@ChubbyPatriot176 ай бұрын
Love your videos, and I was wondering if you would consider doing a tutorial on your timeline charts, like the timeline of US History chart.
@svenhausler89196 ай бұрын
Hey Useful Charts🖐 I really like your videos and posters. Could you also make one about music history and its composers? I would totally buy it.😎
@prashanthkumarkamatham16 күн бұрын
nice narration... and good video by the way !
@trinstonmichaels70626 ай бұрын
You spend so much time on these videos love them
@stampedetrail20036 ай бұрын
Thank you! Fascinating stuff!
@tteeke5 ай бұрын
Great video! Awesome research! One insignificant name error at 39:39? Thank You Much! This is SO helpful for us visual learners! Shalom
@Lightman03595 ай бұрын
The commonality of flood myths could also be simply because major civilizations tend to spring up around rivers, which tend to flood seasonally, and occasionally they flood catastrophically if the winter brought lots of snow to the mountains or the spring rains were unusually heavy [like during El Nino/La Nina type events]
@Skeletors_Closet3 ай бұрын
The lower Mississippi turns some places into lakes during its floods. The Nile is the same way. Before levees, rivers turned those deltas into lakes with dotted with islands. This is true for all major river systems around the world.
@ThatRandomFastingGuy3 ай бұрын
I always thought it was the end of the Ice Age and how oral tradition preserved this event
@Lightman03593 ай бұрын
@@ThatRandomFastingGuy that could have been part of it, especially with glacial lakes emptying out quickly.
@richardjlloyd16 ай бұрын
Splendid video Matt!
@Iambriangregory3 ай бұрын
And how about this for a thought. it could simply because it was a flood that was worldwide like the Bible says and evidence shows. in auto mechanics they say look for the simple answer first then look for other stuff Why so doubt although it's good to question what are you getting out of questioning are you getting closer to the truth?
@jamellfoster60295 ай бұрын
Thanks for this combined presentation. My 21 year old son notified me of this. He's also a Biblical & History lover like myself.
@Uzair_Of_Babylon4656 ай бұрын
Great video keep it up you're doing amazing things 😁👍
@mediatrix11115 ай бұрын
Just stumbled upon this awesome channel. Do you have any video/chart of the timeline of all the Kings of Israel and Judah, along with all the prophets and their region of prophecy? It would real helpful in understanding the Tanakh better. Thks.
@cgt37046 ай бұрын
The bible's story is so interesting. Even if a lot of it is more mythological, its still a great tale.
@hypericacea6 ай бұрын
Your mythological
@rjdsa24186 ай бұрын
*You're @@hypericacea
@hypericacea6 ай бұрын
@@rjdsa2418 I am
@believein16 ай бұрын
Then why is the BIBLE historically, archaeologically, and prophetically accurate?
@Mr.conserv5 ай бұрын
That’s his opinion lol it’s not fact of it being mythological
@Charlie-phlezk6 ай бұрын
Some light viewing. Thanks!
@pucassu6 ай бұрын
❤❤❤ thank you so much
@kamakiller11456 ай бұрын
Hey Matt, would you consider making a video about the origins of the Ishmaelites like you did with the israelites. Amazing work.
@NovaSeven6 ай бұрын
18:55 - Samuel is described as an Ephraimite in 1 Samuel 1:1. It is only in the later Book of 1 Chronicles (6:19-27) that describes him as a Levite. The latter source-writing in the Second Temple Period-probably changed Samuel’s tribe because, by the Chronicler’s time at least, only Levites were recognized as priests.
@rabidwallaby845 ай бұрын
This is further proof that the scriptures have been modifed & adapted to fit specific beliefs, time periods, and methods of controlling a population.
@CorbanDallasMultipass3 ай бұрын
You're assuming incorrectly that genealogy and nationality are the same. Samuel's father is a Levite, but he dwelled in the hill country of Ephraim. That makes him a Levite from the land of Ephraim. The book of Chronicles is concerned with establishing geneologies whereas in Samuel it simply designates where he is from.
@NovaSeven3 ай бұрын
@@CorbanDallasMultipass 1 Samuel 1 describes Samuel’s father Elkanah as both “from Ephraim” (nationality) and “an Ephraimite” (genealogy). There is no room here for Samuel to be a Levite from Ephraim. 1 Chronicles 6:18-23 list Samuel as a Levite. This is an inconsistency between two different sources.
@blueskies64753 ай бұрын
@@CorbanDallasMultipasswhich means he was both a Levite and Ephraimite. The Judah tribe mixed with other tribes more than not!!
@jakoboka6 ай бұрын
Is there a possibility to have an overview of the new poster in which the mistakes of the old poster is highlighted? If have the old ones. I'll give them a marking myselve😊
@solilos5 ай бұрын
Amazing work! Many thanks!
@jeankeats32005 ай бұрын
GREAT work! VERY helpful.
@-RONNIE6 ай бұрын
Thank you this was a really good video
@bobbitibob1976 ай бұрын
I wonder if the idea of people representing regions (from a secular perspective) came from older polytheistic religions?
@TheSignofJonah7776 ай бұрын
Just ordered it 😊 thanks
@TheSignofJonah7776 ай бұрын
Good to note for the genealogy of Jesus in 1:08:00 that at the time Jews at the time believe you are Jewish based off of the father and today it is the mother. (which makes more sense) So that is a possibility to explain the differences.
@Cashiyado6 ай бұрын
Could I ask why do you think it makes more sense?
@grantorino23254 ай бұрын
@@Cashiyado Before DNA testing, there was sometimes doubt over who fathered a natural son. (Even today, in fact, there are cases where identical-twin brothers who slept with the same woman cannot be distinguished.) 🤔 Whereas determining who brought forth a baby simply involves checking the birth records. 🤱
@matthewmarshall3493 ай бұрын
@Cashiyado it's a bit harder to hide the whole giving birth process
@TheSignofJonah7773 ай бұрын
@@Cashiyado You can tell who gave birth. But traditionally the woman moved into the fathers family. It was always assumed the woman wasn't cheating and it was uncommon to do so at the time.
@ryancook16082 ай бұрын
Considering the fact that a whole lot of people converted to the faith of Israel in the OT, and were placed in a tribe, and they and their descendants were counted as natural born of Israel. All them ppl going by either patrineality or matrineality, was a moot point. The biblical genealogy is patrineality, and is only for the purpose of showing Jesus Christ to be the root and offspring of David. Also, in the OT, if the father was an Israelite and the mother was not, the child was an Israelite. If the father was not and the mother was an Israelite, the child was called Israelitish. So the matrineality of Judaism is far removed from the faith of the OT, not that anyone other than Jesus's genealogy matter anyway...
@ThroughTheLensOfAutism6 ай бұрын
Can you make a chart of the Harry Potter family tree?
@UsefulCharts6 ай бұрын
There's been several posted on the UsefulCharts subreddit. And there's one in this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/mmK9omqohL2bmK8
@ThroughTheLensOfAutism6 ай бұрын
@@UsefulCharts Thank you.
@louplayz7525 ай бұрын
For those of you too dumb to understand, bro’s summarizing the entire Bible in a single video
@gg.17393 ай бұрын
Thanks Captain obvious
@louplayz7523 ай бұрын
@@gg.1739 geez
@casthim_into_the_bottomlesspit5 ай бұрын
Thanks for the sharing and let me share something with you too. As I found using BCE to calculate the total number of years of the Old Testament not easy, I count it from Adam instead. [Genesis chapter 5] ▶ [Genesis 6:5, 6:11-13, 6:17] ▶ [Genesis 7:11] 1st-10th: Adam(age 130 had begotten)➡2nd-Seth(105)➡3th-Enos(90)➡4th-Cainan(70)➡5th-Mahalaleel(65)➡6th-Jared(162)➡7th-Enoch(65)➡8th-Methuselah(187)➡9th-Lamech(182)➡10th-Noah(500) begat Shem(be blessed), Ham(firstborn), Japheth(youngest son)/Noah(600) the flood waters was upon the earth. =1656 years [Genesis chapter 11] 1656 years add(+) 11th-Shem(+2years after the flood)➡20th-Abram/Abraham Abraham, 20th from Adam =1948 years (Coincidently, Israel declared Independence in 1948 A.D.) [Genesis 21:5] ▶ [Genesis 25:26] ▶ [Genesis 32:28] ▶ [Genesis 32:28] ▶ [Genesis 47:9] ▶ [Exodus 12:36 & 12:41] fulfilled the word of God [Genesis 15:13-14] ▶ [1 Kings 6:1] 1948 years add(+) Abraham(100)➡Isaac(60)➡Esau & Jacob ➡ Israel(130) ➡ the whole family, 70 members sojourned in Egypt(430)➡after the children of Israel coming out of the land of Egypt(480)➡Solomon began to build the house of the Lord. =3148 years [1 Kings & 2 Kings] ▶[2 Kings chapter 25] 3148 years add(+) From Solomon(362) / (the house of David had reigned for 406 years)➡ By 586 BCE, much of Judah had been devastated. The Old Testament = 4096 years in total
@marissamolina-fy5so6 ай бұрын
Love your channel. ❤️
@devoboysupernova3 ай бұрын
Your videos are just the best. Bravo.
@321ssteeeeeve6 ай бұрын
Nice chart!
@sheriedwards36214 күн бұрын
There is so much information in this video my brain is literally exploding🤯
@tm102935 ай бұрын
Awesome video! This will definitely be the first chart I buy, I'm not religious but the Bible fascinates me in a mythological/historical sense. Also just curious, where do the drawings representing the sons of Jacob come from?
@UsefulCharts5 ай бұрын
They are from a mosaic on the wall of a synagogue in Jerusalem. The mosaic itself is modern but the imagery associated with each tribe goes back to the medieval period.
@iaes30786 ай бұрын
Could you do one on world coins evolution?
@JeffreyChadwell6 ай бұрын
Your chart shows Amon as the son of Manasseh, but you said "Ahaz." Which one is correct?
@StamfordBridge2 ай бұрын
Noticed that, too.
@the_Underrated_CommentАй бұрын
the chart
@rdyrdyp4 ай бұрын
Also, based on my readings: in the event known as The Visitation, teenage Mary, newly pregnant with Jesus, travels alone to visit her first cousin elderly Elizabeth (I think she was in her 80's) and assist Elizabeth with her pregnancy. Mary stays with Elizabeth until Elizabeth gives birth 3 months later. Mary then returns to her hubby Joseph. Then teenage Mary gives birth to Jesus, alone, without any assistance from anybody, based on her experience at her cousin Elizabeth's delivery. Elizabeth's husband Zakariah was killed in the temple where he worked, by Herod's soldiers, when he refused to tell them where his son John the Baptist was hidden. During The Killing of the Innocents.
@matthewmarshall3493 ай бұрын
Im going to be honest, going thr cousin route is odd and ignores the text. Hebrew might not distinguish between siblings and cousins, but Greek certainly does. Not to mention that John the Baptist, who we know to be a cousin, is not labelled as a brother to Jesus.
@dylanx932715 сағат бұрын
1:01:04... some say that Clopas was Joseph's brother.. and Mary of Clopas was Joseph's sister in law... since Mary, mother of Jesus had no siblings..
@sahilsingh60486 ай бұрын
Not only abraham bhramah is a link with hinduism , but also Manu and Noah/Nuh myths are also same
@rdyrdyp4 ай бұрын
Mary Magdalene was referred to as Mary of Magdalen (a place name). Mary of Bethany was Martha and Lazarus' sister. So is Bethany another name for Magdalen?
@mattayes6 ай бұрын
@9:55, is it true that the Biblical authors wouldn’t know about places outside of Northeastern Africa, Europe, and Western Asia? I was under the impression that long-distance trade was common enough by the Iron Age that they would.
@kitfisto18276 ай бұрын
Irrelevant. The only 3 males who survived the flood and had children were Shem, Ham, and Japheth. There was only one race after the flood. All racial and ethnic diversity today comes from those 3 men and their wives. It would not matter if later writers knew about others or not. It would not change the fact that they all have the same origin.
@danielmadar99385 ай бұрын
Thanks
@michaelbindner98834 ай бұрын
Joseph of Arimathea may have been a relative of Mary, with members of the family, including Jesus, buried in one of two tombs in his property. The ossuaries are in a museum storeroom in Jerusalem. I wonder how adding clay to the skull of that Jesus would look.
@masada28282 ай бұрын
Hagar was Sarah’s handmaid who served her (as her slave), she was given to Abraham to bear a child for Sarah (as was their culture), Abraham did not marry her. Abraham did not marry again until after Sarah died when he married Keturah & had 6 more sons (fathers of the Arab nations).
@Magusbrrj27Ай бұрын
Yes.
@malajamesaaaa15 күн бұрын
How do you explain the genealogy in the 4. Th chapter of Ruth was prophesied in the 38 th chapter of Genesis on 49 letters intervals?
@Cryptic_Chai3 ай бұрын
This channel can create Theoritical History of Mankind from A to Z all integrated
@CrowMagnumMan20246 ай бұрын
Does the chart you are selling contain all of the charts you used in this video ?.......thanks for all your hard work....!!
@UsefulCharts6 ай бұрын
Yes, except for the extended chart of Jesus's family shown at the end, since that is based on tradition rather than the Bible.
@CrowMagnumMan20246 ай бұрын
@@UsefulCharts Thank you very much...I have purchased it....I think this will be an amazing resource for building the vast outline of the bible into my memory using this new perspective......!!!
@Mr_Sapphire6 ай бұрын
Hey can you do the next video. Who would be the emir of Bukhara?
@Eglaro3 ай бұрын
It’s good to see nepotism was just as prevalent.
@jakoboka6 ай бұрын
InspiringPhilosophy and Matt Baker combined in a dialogue on the bible would be epic!
@Danl1960Ай бұрын
Japeth begat Gomer, Gomer begat ashkenaz
@marcchesley37314 ай бұрын
God created more people besides Adam and Eve and it is explained that after Cain killed Abel God exiled Cain and put a seal on his forehead so that "anyone" comes across him or finds him they will not harm him. There shouldn't be anyone to harm Cain if there were no other people. This proves that God made other people and Seth their third son was not born yet
@caseypenk6 ай бұрын
Something I’ve wondered since I started learning about the history of religion: Is it considered heresy under Christian theology to acknowledge that certain stories or figures are mythical? Or is it only heretical to deny Jesus’s personhood and/or Godhood?
@jemmaisweird6 ай бұрын
very much depends who you ask. christianity is not a monolith, and in my church it’s totally acceptable to believe that certain parts of the bible are just stories/allegories. we even have some of matt’s charts in the youth group room! there are other congregations from my same denomination that believe the bible (specifically the KJV) is 100% factual and to question that is completely out of line.
@kitfisto18276 ай бұрын
heresy is simply the deliberate spreading of falsehoods
@Masahanate-7776 ай бұрын
Ask the Orthodox Church, don't ask the Protestants in America, there are too many denoms with different opinions and beliefs that make people confused about Christianity
@Masahanate-7776 ай бұрын
@@jemmaisweirdIt's teachings like this that have made many Christians in America become atheists because there's no clarity on what the true faith is. People just choose what they want to believe. That's what led to people arguing with each other about which one is true and ended up founding other churches that suited their mindset.
@DianaBell_MG6 ай бұрын
@55:49 you show on the screen that Apostille John is the same person who wrote the Book of John and Revelations, but we know pretty concretely that John wasn't written until around 100 AD and didn't have singular author. How old do you think the guy was when writing this book?
@kitfisto18276 ай бұрын
Probably in his 90's
@sadib1006 ай бұрын
39:39 You said Ahaz instead of Amon.
@Goin2bmd1226 күн бұрын
Love the charts! Not sure if this has been mentioned but around the 9:30 mark you discuss how the Biblical writers weren't aware of the people living on the other continents and only knew of what was around them. This is only correct because there was no other humans inhabiting other continents. The flood and Noah happened in Genesis 6. So from that event there would only be the 3 sons later down the road in Genesis 11 the tower of babel occurs. That is when the far regions of the world become inhabited and wasn't until then. This would change the narrative that the writers just didn't know while also giving credence that everyone currently is a descendant of Noah's 3 sons, or Noah himself.
@IlCanaleDiFresh4 ай бұрын
Hi, I'm an Italian student. Excellent work. Congratulations. I need some clarification regarding the dates of Kings... You put the start of Kingdoms of Judah and Israel 930 BCE... Do you take this reference from? Thiele, Galil, Albright... Anyway, I see a cronology that start this Kingdom 997 BCE. Isn't possible?? Thanks
@Replicaate6 ай бұрын
Well I know what I'm doing for the next hour and ten.
@robertpenny71806 ай бұрын
@4:00 The extra names look like they have Mesopotamian influence, I wouldn't doubt if they were added from Babylonian myths. The story of Noah has roots from the Epic of Gilgamesh, with Utnapishtim, who scholars believe may be the basis.
@joshuasheets92362 ай бұрын
I wonder if anyone lived through and remembered the whole Babylonian exile. Born in Israel > At 20 Years old get exiled > Spend 49 years in exile > Come back to Israel at 69
@dylanx932715 сағат бұрын
1:08:12...both genealogies belong to Joseph.. one is legal, the other biological... according to Eusebius ...or according to Augustine (Joseph was adapted).. two genealogies use different words: begotten vs son of... either way goal is to show that Joseph is from the line of David ..stump of Jesse..
@westwoodnik6 ай бұрын
Just a thought...for the biblical composition timeline, would we want to put the chunks with alleged earlier authorships like the Song of Deborah, Song of the Sea etc 'earlier up' on the timeline closer to their supposedly more likely written timeperiod?
@Foyay_RedАй бұрын
I’m a descendent of David so this is like my family tree
@Y3ntiLS0uP9 күн бұрын
Literally impossible as David didn't exist.
@karidesisrinivas93795 ай бұрын
This is my good opportunity
@darynvoss78834 ай бұрын
But wouldn't it be weird for Anne to name three of her daughters Mary?
@grantorino23254 ай бұрын
In Spain, up until a generation ago, practically all girls were named "Maria." Thus, they often went by their middle names. And in ancient times, there were much fewer names to go around. In ancient Rome, for instance, so many important people had similar 1st and 2nd names that modern historians tend to refer to them by their 3rd or even 4th names! e.g. "Gaius Julius Caesar Aurelia" ("Julius Caesar") and "Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus" ("Caesar Augustus"). In fact, two significant Roman figures, born a generation apart, were BOTH named "Gaius Plinius Caecilius Secundus." Thus, we English speakers refer to them simply as "Pliny the Elder" and "Pliny the Younger."
@Str8Gifted6 ай бұрын
I like how they have Adam and then Eve... Then Cain and Abel... Then yada yada yada yada yada Noah.... We just won't talk about how we got there lol
@StamfordBridge2 ай бұрын
I have sometimes heard it claimed that Jesus is the descendant of an ancestor produced by the congress of Lot and one of his daughters. So, according to this chart, this is not true?
@Magusbrrj27Ай бұрын
One of His ancestors, Ruth, a moabite, descends from Lot. She married Boaz, an israelite. He was king David's Great grandfather.
@drumroll755224 күн бұрын
In the Zugot (pairs) period, the Nasi (president) was the head of "government," and the Av Beit Din (father of court) was the head of law and religion - not a vice president.
@itsa-itsagames5 ай бұрын
The three races thing is just a generalization. Like they're saying at a point when there was only so many ppl, that the separation eventually lead to 3 main types of peoples. But naturally over the course of millennia, these groups also spread out and mixed with each other to then create new bloodlines and new types of people, leading to the 100s of types we have today. It's not like Noah had one son who was black and one son who was white and an Asian but this point in history is so far back that when they spread out, geography and the conditions created different races. I heard some where that white people are really only been a thing for 10k years or so , a lot of that was from diet and where they lived
@redflags65836 ай бұрын
Ishmael should be mentioned too because of his importance to Islam
@kingbowserii3029Ай бұрын
I counted them at 14:49 and there are ten of Jacobs sons in yellow
@v.m.9198Ай бұрын
Anyone else ever thought it was weird that adam and eve had a third son named seth and then you learn about the ancient egyptian god named set, who was often portrayed as dangerous or antagonistic? Was that done on purpose when the scrolls were written later on or just one of those weird coincidences?
@jmd94026 ай бұрын
not sure if you take requests but if you do, how about "who would be the shogun of japan today?"
@kimjong44705 ай бұрын
Jesus was a human 🎉
@masterofpuppets4446 ай бұрын
Why is zedekiah replaced with Zachariah in your timeline during second period temple?
@UsefulCharts6 ай бұрын
That segment is from a video which still has the typo. The poster version is now correct.
@sadib1005 ай бұрын
Why does the chart not show that Abraham and Sarah are half-siblings? The family tree chart in your Timeline of the Bible book states that.
@michaeladu61206 ай бұрын
12:18 Please, don't encourage the Hindu nationalists.
@dylanx932715 сағат бұрын
1:00:40... in the Koran (7 century).. .Miriam (not Mary), mother of Isa (not Jesus) is daughter of Imran (father of Islamic Moses)... Koran is clueless about Bible... also Ishah (six your old wife of Mohamed) talks about it in one of her hadiths..
@malajamesaaaa15 күн бұрын
Why don’t you take NT books Mathew and Luke genealogy’ chronological order ?
@djsarg74516 ай бұрын
The genealogies are adequate but not complete. No matter how you read the genealogies, you must concede that there are gaps. Also Biblical Hebrew has a limited vocabulary, with fewer words compared to other languages, such as English. Thus genealogical terms like “son” and “father” have much broader meanings than their corresponding English words. Thus “son” (ben, 1121) means son, grandson, great grandson, and descendent. Similarly, “father” (ab, 1) means father, grandfather, great-grandfather, and ancestor.
@matthewmarshall3493 ай бұрын
My Old Testament prof was fond of saying that "the ink was probably still wet" when the texts were "rediscovered" during Josiah's reign. Hope you're well Dr. Bembry.
@garethbaus54712 ай бұрын
That wouldn't be surprising.
@Lani0116 ай бұрын
Interesting
@brua77777775 ай бұрын
Samuel was a Ephraimite "1st Samuel 1:1"
@travisrafferty78045 ай бұрын
This video has represented a recent view. I have been watching this channel for many years, please go back to the old vids