Using Autopilots to fly Instrument Procedures

Real life #MasteryNotMinimums pro tips on how to best use autopilots on intrument approaches. A must watch webinar, please share with others
***Important clarification. I said in the webinar a couple of times that it is illegal to track a final approach segment of a VOR/LOC etc in GPS.... That's totally true but....
Several people reached out for clarification on the AIM 1-2-C-5 says you can if you monitor the ground based navaid at the same time."
So the short version is you cannot unless you double your workload and monitor a 2nd nav source at the same time while focusing on the GPS. To reduce workload, I don't reccomend it. I did want you to have all the correct info.
Thanks to everyone who reached out for clairification!!

[@PilotSafetyOrg]

***Important clarification. I said in the webinar a couple of times that it is illegal to track a final approach segment of a VOR/LOC etc in GPS.... That's totally true but.... Several people reached out for clarification on the AIM 1-2-C-5 says you can if you monitor the ground based navaid at the same time." So the short version is you cannot unless you double your workload and monitor a 2nd nav source at the same time while focusing on the GPS. To reduce workload, I don't reccomend it. I did want you to have all the correct info. Thanks to everyone who reached out for clairification!!

[@06teeth]

As GPS is more stable than the VOR, I don't see how it doubles the work. I simply monitor the VOR with a bearing pointer on the same Sandel display but fly the much more stable GPS signal.

[@astrav25]

You’re allowed to reference via a bearing pointer. Check your avionics manual for LOC. I bet it specifically states that if on any localizer-based approach, the active mode MUST be LOC. Flying a VOR in a GPS overlay allows the affordability of VNAV path as well. The VPA is even listed on the chart.

[@JustMe00257]

When one asks others to be open minded, one should also be open minded and not show a sense of superiority when confronting different opinions... Like about the gear! BTW, automation dependency has long been documented as a deep issue in airline flying, to the point where the FAA issued a circular last year to emphasize the need for airline pilots to practice raw data flying. I do it often on the line and many airlines encourage or allow that. Engaging the autopilot every single time at 200ft is a receipe for disaster for you WILL eventually lose your skills and yes, these skills matter. Thats a fact, quite an obvious one and not zn opinion. While in a single pilot environment, there are obvious benefits in reducing the workload, one should still practice in good conditions in order to remain proficient. Otherwise, one is just an accident waiting to happen. Also, in IFR especially, having a safety pilot monitoring and supporting could certainly improve safety to a large degree. Im a little uncomfortable seing all these pilots flying alone without any backup.

[@BenevolentBall]

Holy cow! 33:44 you gotta warn a person Great video though

[@michaelwilliamsd.o.5006]

the engine got a little loud.....Heart attack!!

[@DeusEstPrimus]

If the white light theory has been proven, please provide your source. I can provide atleast 3 different sources that counter your claim. You say a lot of conteoversial things and thats fine, as long as you cite your source. You never seem to do that though and it bothers me. I know you are a great instructor but you still need to back up what you say. Otherwise, it's just another guys opinion

[@jbazz]

2 years later... I guess he can't cite a source. :(

[@dbagnall]

Rhodopsin is produced in the eye at night to enhance visual perception in reduced light environments. White light metabolizes rhodopsin (splits it into 2 separate chemicals), reducing the eye’s ability to perceive objects at night. Red light has a significantly reduced effect on rhodopsin, therefore red light is used today by astronomers, pilots, submariners and others who need to work in reduced light. Red light IS better in maintaining night vision despite what Mr. Reeves (an otherwise excellent instructor) claims. He exudes well-earned confidence, but a little humility might serve him well.