What is Res Ipsa Loquitor?

  Рет қаралды 92,766

USLawEssentials

USLawEssentials

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 73
@indaystocome7416
@indaystocome7416 6 жыл бұрын
I have found my new torts teacher, thank you for making it so much easier than law school. The examples are great. Please do more on scope of liability, causation etc.
@Harlem55
@Harlem55 2 жыл бұрын
If you have problems with tort law, just wait till you get to cons law.
@parthsolanki5226
@parthsolanki5226 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the easiest explaination.. it really helped me a lot to understand the concept in a short period.
@joemunch58
@joemunch58 6 жыл бұрын
The concept is from Byrne v. Boadle in 1863. It wasn't a refrigerator, it was a barrel of flour from the second floor of a shop. In law school, we took "res (pronounced race) ipsa loquiter" to mean "If a barrel falls on your head, it's the other guy's fault."
@RajatAgrawal21
@RajatAgrawal21 9 жыл бұрын
Great videos. Loved the bit of dance animation there!
@USLawEssentials
@USLawEssentials 9 жыл бұрын
+Rajat Agrawal Thanks very much!
@Edress786
@Edress786 3 жыл бұрын
From 2:19 to 2:38 is the best part and the entire summary of res ipsa loquitur.
@JC-ce8uw
@JC-ce8uw 7 жыл бұрын
brilliant!!! thank you for breaking this down and explaining
@USLawEssentials
@USLawEssentials 7 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@sheenamkamboj806
@sheenamkamboj806 3 жыл бұрын
That dance moves though😂😂😂😂
@neeleshsoni7009
@neeleshsoni7009 4 жыл бұрын
thank you for explaining this so easily ♥️♥️♥️
@USLawEssentials
@USLawEssentials 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching NS. Let me know if other topics interest you. uslawessentials.com/blog
@shwetasinghal3718
@shwetasinghal3718 3 жыл бұрын
Actually entertaining n it was easy to understand in such beautiful animated way👍🏻
@lexisovasquez
@lexisovasquez 4 жыл бұрын
the voice over was extremely calming .
@zapazap
@zapazap 9 жыл бұрын
On the white board (0m16s) we are told that we may presume that the defendant must have been careless. In the cartoon (2m32s) we are told that we may presume that the defendant had been careless. The word "must" is used in the first description of what may be presumed, but not in the second. Only the second seems to me to describe a rebuttable presumption. Clarification would be appreciated.
@ch1378
@ch1378 4 жыл бұрын
Great video! Thank you for the concise and clear explanation.
@USLawEssentials
@USLawEssentials 4 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@StoutShako
@StoutShako 4 жыл бұрын
This is the cutest law channel I've seen thumbs up for the little dancing Anime Girls and Anime Judge lol!
@cchang1110
@cchang1110 5 жыл бұрын
Thank you for making these posts! Clearly explained! Greatly appreciated!
@USLawEssentials
@USLawEssentials 5 жыл бұрын
Thanks, you can see more at uslawessentials.com
@nenisgiovana
@nenisgiovana 9 жыл бұрын
Hi, congratulations for this awesome work it helps me a lot!
@USLawEssentials
@USLawEssentials 9 жыл бұрын
Sky Al Thanks! Stay tuned for updates. uslawessentials.com
@christinemartinez3537
@christinemartinez3537 4 жыл бұрын
Well explained. Thank you ❤️ great example too 😊
@USLawEssentials
@USLawEssentials 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks! uslawessentials.com
@JamesEdwardTracy
@JamesEdwardTracy 5 жыл бұрын
On the question of physician-assisted suicide, could rest ipsa loquitur be used as an argument for why someone should be allowed the assistance? it seems to me quite reasonable that if someone asks for physician-assisted suicide, that the act itself rises above self preservation enough so that it should be honored automatically.
@worldaround6520
@worldaround6520 3 ай бұрын
Thanks sir. The word "eloquence" is related to speech. The term "loquitur" is linguistically related to "eloquence," and therefore "loquitur" means "to speak." "Ipsilateral" means "on the same side." "Ipsa" means "the same thing" or "itself." "Res ipsa loquitur" means "the thing speaks for itself."
@minghin1228
@minghin1228 5 жыл бұрын
Fantastic video
@jo-annawatt8433
@jo-annawatt8433 Жыл бұрын
In the Case Miller vs Jacoby (2001), Does the fact that the defense did produce expert witness testimony negate a successful res ipsa loquitur outcome?
@USLawEssentials
@USLawEssentials Жыл бұрын
I didn't know the defendants produced expert testimony. Is that in the case?
@clarittana
@clarittana 10 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much!
@USLawEssentials
@USLawEssentials 10 жыл бұрын
You're welcome. Good to hear from you.
@flyingfeatheredrat
@flyingfeatheredrat 4 жыл бұрын
Even a child could understand! Brilliant and hilarious court dance moves! Wish I could sue Nike outlet for negligence.
@priscillanaaaklerhokantey9963
@priscillanaaaklerhokantey9963 Жыл бұрын
this was helpful, thanks
@dantesmith3664
@dantesmith3664 4 жыл бұрын
good video. thank you
@ianeunellmalinao9
@ianeunellmalinao9 5 жыл бұрын
How can it apply to a car accident,? Res ipsa liquitor vs doctrine of last clear chance....
@daypayannath1133
@daypayannath1133 6 жыл бұрын
Thanks dude... So simple... Got it... ❤️
@USLawEssentials
@USLawEssentials 6 жыл бұрын
Thanks Daypayan. More here: uslawessentials.com
@abhinaysingh27
@abhinaysingh27 7 жыл бұрын
thankyou very much .
@USLawEssentials
@USLawEssentials 7 жыл бұрын
Sure!
@lioneagle777
@lioneagle777 2 жыл бұрын
Pls explain me this topic sir Malicious prosecution and nuicence
@valardohaeris333
@valardohaeris333 5 жыл бұрын
You guys rock
@mahjabeennisa5506
@mahjabeennisa5506 6 жыл бұрын
sir acha hai apka explanation
@dittykins
@dittykins 10 жыл бұрын
Can you please do videos that encompass Civil Procedure? JMOL, JNOV and preclusion doctrine? Thank you.
@USLawEssentials
@USLawEssentials 10 жыл бұрын
DittyK, that's a helpful suggestion. I do have some videos on CivPro (kzbin.info/aero/PLRXyknBDMNN20dypjtwUqxlJqkacsHTUf) but will add to the playlist including Rules 50, 59 and preclusion.
@dittykins
@dittykins 10 жыл бұрын
USLawEssentials Sounds good, I appreciate it. The examples in your videos help me see how the black letter of the law is actually applied.
@amidab9074
@amidab9074 9 жыл бұрын
Amazing explanation, post more please. In particular on promissory estoppel? Thanks
@USLawEssentials
@USLawEssentials 9 жыл бұрын
Hi Ami, 1. Here you are....kzbin.info/www/bejne/qaOxdJ6gpp5jqac 2. Thanks for your kind words. 3. I have a blog and forum where you can explore some more. The forum would greatly benefit from strong students who are studying US law and willing to share suggestions with students who are at a more basic level. More advanced students can also assist each other with trickier topics. Take a look please...uslawessentials.com/forum
@amidab9074
@amidab9074 9 жыл бұрын
Ahhh u are literally amazing. Fantastic quality video excellent expertise I will definitely come back for more. Keep up the great work. Many thanks
@jansdoe6963
@jansdoe6963 4 жыл бұрын
It means "The thing speaks for itself." Lawyers like to talk strangely.
@TheBobelly628
@TheBobelly628 5 жыл бұрын
Where are their arms and legs :-) Great video- love your way of teaching!
@shivaniverma8801
@shivaniverma8801 5 жыл бұрын
Ugh . I
@tatsuyaaidan380
@tatsuyaaidan380 6 жыл бұрын
Wowww so creative mates!
@Harlem55
@Harlem55 2 жыл бұрын
Not to be confused with negligence per se
@RDayal-qr6ip
@RDayal-qr6ip 6 жыл бұрын
Les Ipso Loquitor shall be appropriate in mediation matters in the medical profession .Doctors would face negligence for treating a patient and charging for an ailment that never prevailed converting hospitals into profit making bodies. The noble profession has finally bedn included under the Consumer Act. Medical profession has been covered under tge Consumer Protection Act but does not cover government hospitals or government employees treated in private hospitals claiming from govt. So, patients are referred to pathologists and hospitals by govt. doctors. this was to introduced to make the service available convenient besides land lease agreement of hospital bldg etc. The question is how can you differentiate a patient as consumer and ine who is not a consumer merely on the basis of receiving payment. The next question that arises is the patient fies not pay for himself many times when on bed. Its from his account, his guardian who pays for him. How can a civil servant who has entered into a service contract includes medical benefits not be a consumer. The govt. may provide private or public facility is its policy. The doctors are paid from revenue . How do insurance companies deal with it?
@LittleVboh
@LittleVboh 5 жыл бұрын
Isn't is Loquitur?
@USLawEssentials
@USLawEssentials 5 жыл бұрын
I don't think so, but I'm happy to be corrected.
@an0n71
@an0n71 3 жыл бұрын
What if she has a visitor and that person did it
@fayen8
@fayen8 Жыл бұрын
I am here for the sassy animation.
@CombraStudios
@CombraStudios 5 жыл бұрын
The characters are cute
@kanumurisivasatish9295
@kanumurisivasatish9295 3 жыл бұрын
Plz put these videos as Tort playlist
@USLawEssentials
@USLawEssentials 3 жыл бұрын
Hey there! I think this is on the playlist. Sorry if I’m mistaken.
@crunchyedge
@crunchyedge 5 жыл бұрын
brb taking that fridge thats on my roof down
@nankubaaisha378
@nankubaaisha378 3 жыл бұрын
Ts anyc one,thnx
@shafathahmed650
@shafathahmed650 5 жыл бұрын
love from bangladesh 🇧🇩
@lisalasoya2898
@lisalasoya2898 Жыл бұрын
So, I'll answer the question at hand-What is res ipsa loquiter? The thing or transaction speaks for itself. What can I tell you you have to have a halo over your head.
@ඇහැටසීනිබෝල
@ඇහැටසීනිබෝල 4 жыл бұрын
All the debbies have disliked the video 😂
@Kar0melli
@Kar0melli 4 жыл бұрын
Who's here because of Johnny Depps tattoo? (And the trial against Amber Turd)
@ianeunellmalinao9
@ianeunellmalinao9 5 жыл бұрын
Z
@blackfalcon1324
@blackfalcon1324 Жыл бұрын
The pronunciation made me cringe but good information.
@causticfaucet
@causticfaucet 4 жыл бұрын
why the anime characters tho 🥴
@johnodo764
@johnodo764 Жыл бұрын
Your injured plaintiff dancing in court when the verdict went her way is wholly inappropriate.
@PreachingTV786
@PreachingTV786 Жыл бұрын
everything was right but animation is disgusting sir💀
@deblo420
@deblo420 2 жыл бұрын
WELL EXPLAINED THANK U ...
What is negligent infliction of emotional distress?
2:49
USLawEssentials
Рет қаралды 17 М.
Elements of Negligence
9:45
LawShelf
Рет қаралды 40 М.
Жездуха 41-серия
36:26
Million Show
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
Почему Катар богатый? #shorts
0:45
Послезавтра
Рет қаралды 2 МЛН
Res Ipsa Loquitur
5:30
Learn Law Better
Рет қаралды 30 М.
Tort Law - Duty of Care
17:31
marcuscleaver
Рет қаралды 72 М.
Episode 1.1: What is Torts? And what Torts is not.
10:20
Center for Innovation in Legal Education
Рет қаралды 700 М.
Boston Legal -  Same sex attraction disorder (Alan Shore)
3:47
DOELNEYGS
Рет қаралды 924 М.
What are But For and Substantial Factor Causation?
3:15
USLawEssentials
Рет қаралды 49 М.
What is proximate cause?
5:06
USLawEssentials
Рет қаралды 37 М.
NEGLIGENCE IN EASY STEPS
11:32
LearnLoads
Рет қаралды 14 М.
Жездуха 41-серия
36:26
Million Show
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН