I have found my new torts teacher, thank you for making it so much easier than law school. The examples are great. Please do more on scope of liability, causation etc.
@Harlem552 жыл бұрын
If you have problems with tort law, just wait till you get to cons law.
@parthsolanki52264 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the easiest explaination.. it really helped me a lot to understand the concept in a short period.
@joemunch586 жыл бұрын
The concept is from Byrne v. Boadle in 1863. It wasn't a refrigerator, it was a barrel of flour from the second floor of a shop. In law school, we took "res (pronounced race) ipsa loquiter" to mean "If a barrel falls on your head, it's the other guy's fault."
@RajatAgrawal219 жыл бұрын
Great videos. Loved the bit of dance animation there!
@USLawEssentials9 жыл бұрын
+Rajat Agrawal Thanks very much!
@Edress7863 жыл бұрын
From 2:19 to 2:38 is the best part and the entire summary of res ipsa loquitur.
@JC-ce8uw7 жыл бұрын
brilliant!!! thank you for breaking this down and explaining
@USLawEssentials7 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@sheenamkamboj8063 жыл бұрын
That dance moves though😂😂😂😂
@neeleshsoni70094 жыл бұрын
thank you for explaining this so easily ♥️♥️♥️
@USLawEssentials4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching NS. Let me know if other topics interest you. uslawessentials.com/blog
@shwetasinghal37183 жыл бұрын
Actually entertaining n it was easy to understand in such beautiful animated way👍🏻
@lexisovasquez4 жыл бұрын
the voice over was extremely calming .
@zapazap9 жыл бұрын
On the white board (0m16s) we are told that we may presume that the defendant must have been careless. In the cartoon (2m32s) we are told that we may presume that the defendant had been careless. The word "must" is used in the first description of what may be presumed, but not in the second. Only the second seems to me to describe a rebuttable presumption. Clarification would be appreciated.
@ch13784 жыл бұрын
Great video! Thank you for the concise and clear explanation.
@USLawEssentials4 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@StoutShako4 жыл бұрын
This is the cutest law channel I've seen thumbs up for the little dancing Anime Girls and Anime Judge lol!
@cchang11105 жыл бұрын
Thank you for making these posts! Clearly explained! Greatly appreciated!
@USLawEssentials5 жыл бұрын
Thanks, you can see more at uslawessentials.com
@nenisgiovana9 жыл бұрын
Hi, congratulations for this awesome work it helps me a lot!
@USLawEssentials9 жыл бұрын
Sky Al Thanks! Stay tuned for updates. uslawessentials.com
@christinemartinez35374 жыл бұрын
Well explained. Thank you ❤️ great example too 😊
@USLawEssentials4 жыл бұрын
Thanks! uslawessentials.com
@JamesEdwardTracy5 жыл бұрын
On the question of physician-assisted suicide, could rest ipsa loquitur be used as an argument for why someone should be allowed the assistance? it seems to me quite reasonable that if someone asks for physician-assisted suicide, that the act itself rises above self preservation enough so that it should be honored automatically.
@worldaround65203 ай бұрын
Thanks sir. The word "eloquence" is related to speech. The term "loquitur" is linguistically related to "eloquence," and therefore "loquitur" means "to speak." "Ipsilateral" means "on the same side." "Ipsa" means "the same thing" or "itself." "Res ipsa loquitur" means "the thing speaks for itself."
@minghin12285 жыл бұрын
Fantastic video
@jo-annawatt8433 Жыл бұрын
In the Case Miller vs Jacoby (2001), Does the fact that the defense did produce expert witness testimony negate a successful res ipsa loquitur outcome?
@USLawEssentials Жыл бұрын
I didn't know the defendants produced expert testimony. Is that in the case?
@clarittana10 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much!
@USLawEssentials10 жыл бұрын
You're welcome. Good to hear from you.
@flyingfeatheredrat4 жыл бұрын
Even a child could understand! Brilliant and hilarious court dance moves! Wish I could sue Nike outlet for negligence.
@priscillanaaaklerhokantey9963 Жыл бұрын
this was helpful, thanks
@dantesmith36644 жыл бұрын
good video. thank you
@ianeunellmalinao95 жыл бұрын
How can it apply to a car accident,? Res ipsa liquitor vs doctrine of last clear chance....
@daypayannath11336 жыл бұрын
Thanks dude... So simple... Got it... ❤️
@USLawEssentials6 жыл бұрын
Thanks Daypayan. More here: uslawessentials.com
@abhinaysingh277 жыл бұрын
thankyou very much .
@USLawEssentials7 жыл бұрын
Sure!
@lioneagle7772 жыл бұрын
Pls explain me this topic sir Malicious prosecution and nuicence
@valardohaeris3335 жыл бұрын
You guys rock
@mahjabeennisa55066 жыл бұрын
sir acha hai apka explanation
@dittykins10 жыл бұрын
Can you please do videos that encompass Civil Procedure? JMOL, JNOV and preclusion doctrine? Thank you.
@USLawEssentials10 жыл бұрын
DittyK, that's a helpful suggestion. I do have some videos on CivPro (kzbin.info/aero/PLRXyknBDMNN20dypjtwUqxlJqkacsHTUf) but will add to the playlist including Rules 50, 59 and preclusion.
@dittykins10 жыл бұрын
USLawEssentials Sounds good, I appreciate it. The examples in your videos help me see how the black letter of the law is actually applied.
@amidab90749 жыл бұрын
Amazing explanation, post more please. In particular on promissory estoppel? Thanks
@USLawEssentials9 жыл бұрын
Hi Ami, 1. Here you are....kzbin.info/www/bejne/qaOxdJ6gpp5jqac 2. Thanks for your kind words. 3. I have a blog and forum where you can explore some more. The forum would greatly benefit from strong students who are studying US law and willing to share suggestions with students who are at a more basic level. More advanced students can also assist each other with trickier topics. Take a look please...uslawessentials.com/forum
@amidab90749 жыл бұрын
Ahhh u are literally amazing. Fantastic quality video excellent expertise I will definitely come back for more. Keep up the great work. Many thanks
@jansdoe69634 жыл бұрын
It means "The thing speaks for itself." Lawyers like to talk strangely.
@TheBobelly6285 жыл бұрын
Where are their arms and legs :-) Great video- love your way of teaching!
@shivaniverma88015 жыл бұрын
Ugh . I
@tatsuyaaidan3806 жыл бұрын
Wowww so creative mates!
@Harlem552 жыл бұрын
Not to be confused with negligence per se
@RDayal-qr6ip6 жыл бұрын
Les Ipso Loquitor shall be appropriate in mediation matters in the medical profession .Doctors would face negligence for treating a patient and charging for an ailment that never prevailed converting hospitals into profit making bodies. The noble profession has finally bedn included under the Consumer Act. Medical profession has been covered under tge Consumer Protection Act but does not cover government hospitals or government employees treated in private hospitals claiming from govt. So, patients are referred to pathologists and hospitals by govt. doctors. this was to introduced to make the service available convenient besides land lease agreement of hospital bldg etc. The question is how can you differentiate a patient as consumer and ine who is not a consumer merely on the basis of receiving payment. The next question that arises is the patient fies not pay for himself many times when on bed. Its from his account, his guardian who pays for him. How can a civil servant who has entered into a service contract includes medical benefits not be a consumer. The govt. may provide private or public facility is its policy. The doctors are paid from revenue . How do insurance companies deal with it?
@LittleVboh5 жыл бұрын
Isn't is Loquitur?
@USLawEssentials5 жыл бұрын
I don't think so, but I'm happy to be corrected.
@an0n713 жыл бұрын
What if she has a visitor and that person did it
@fayen8 Жыл бұрын
I am here for the sassy animation.
@CombraStudios5 жыл бұрын
The characters are cute
@kanumurisivasatish92953 жыл бұрын
Plz put these videos as Tort playlist
@USLawEssentials3 жыл бұрын
Hey there! I think this is on the playlist. Sorry if I’m mistaken.
@crunchyedge5 жыл бұрын
brb taking that fridge thats on my roof down
@nankubaaisha3783 жыл бұрын
Ts anyc one,thnx
@shafathahmed6505 жыл бұрын
love from bangladesh 🇧🇩
@lisalasoya2898 Жыл бұрын
So, I'll answer the question at hand-What is res ipsa loquiter? The thing or transaction speaks for itself. What can I tell you you have to have a halo over your head.
@ඇහැටසීනිබෝල4 жыл бұрын
All the debbies have disliked the video 😂
@Kar0melli4 жыл бұрын
Who's here because of Johnny Depps tattoo? (And the trial against Amber Turd)
@ianeunellmalinao95 жыл бұрын
Z
@blackfalcon1324 Жыл бұрын
The pronunciation made me cringe but good information.
@causticfaucet4 жыл бұрын
why the anime characters tho 🥴
@johnodo764 Жыл бұрын
Your injured plaintiff dancing in court when the verdict went her way is wholly inappropriate.
@PreachingTV786 Жыл бұрын
everything was right but animation is disgusting sir💀