Uthman Ibn Farooq | Hanbali Fiqh, Muslim Unity & Criticising Rulers | BB

[@mohamedsaleh5790]

2:24 - Do you follow a madhab? 10:13 - What is the ruling on those that miss Salah ? 15:16 - Is the Niqab fardh? 21:28 - is Smoking haram? 23:35 - Is all seafood permissible? 25:43 - Is eating from McDonald's halal in the west? 32:16 - Fiqh of Divorce (3x talaq) 35:46 - Can we give salam to non-Muslims ? 36:35 - Do Salafis have respect for Madhabs? 40:33 - Would you give dawah or a talk in a Non-Salafi masjid? 45:59 - Can there be brotherhood with those that practice Istighstha or Mawlid etc ? 49:36 - Can there ever be unity with those who have a different Aqidah? 57:37 - His confrontation with Daniel Haqiqatjou last year. 1:04:53 - Can we unite behind a khalif with a different Aqidah ? 1:10:41 - issue of obeying the ruler 1:16:18 - Can you criticise the ruler ? 1:27:25 - Did you really get stabbed ?

[@imaadindor]

Please pin this

[@mohamedsaleh5790]

@@imaadindoronly blood brothers admin can do that, im just a viewer

[@SlaveofAllahhh]

JazakAllah khair 🙌🙌

[@Mo9ala7]

Jazak Allah Khairan

[@alu177]

Remember the path or manhajj the prophet of Islam left for the ummah are the TWO WEIGHTY MATTERS the Qur'an and Ahlulbayt Known is hadith Thaqalayn Thank you

[@mohpat9989]

Shaykh does good work defending Islam against the enemies of Islam, the muslim community appreciates this and hopes shaykh Uthman carries on with his work against the enemies of Islam

[@jeje4042]

But makes a grave mistake honouring leaders/ figures in the salafi community

[@DaveSpeaks994]

@@jeje4042why?

[@mohpat9989]

@@jeje4042 nothing wrong with that

[@abdullahassaffah]

He isn't a sheikh/scholar

[@mohpat9989]

@@abdullahassaffah he says in the video he is not I said it out of respect

[@mohammedel-yakubu3247]

Sheikh uthman, you’re a good role model for the Muslims because you put in the work for Allah SWT, see how Allah has elevated you and made you loved worldwide, may Allah increase you in strength and guidance!

[@brothersman524]

MashaAllah love this shaykh. Came to my local masjid on his tour to the UK and hugged him. And like him, I work in the science field too

[@mohammedkhan7271]

Great Podcast & a well respected & well knowledgeable guest. May Allah swt guide us on the path of the Sahabah & we follow the Quran & Sunnah….. Ameen

[@afrinatanwi6907]

Ameen❤

[@alu177]

Remember brother, the prophet of Islam left TWO weighty matters the Qur'an and ahlulbayt for source of guidance after him Not the sahaabah. Pls check N Investigate

[@joefrazier9282]

Fear Allah YA KADDAB! Allah PRAISED the sahabah. U rafidhi kaddab. We love the Ahlul Bayt, u are an evil liar.

[@miggaz6649]

The quality of this is a pure diamond بارك الله فيكم اخوتنا

[@everysoultasteadeath1027]

Allahumma baarik. Alhamdullah, Ya Allah. Many many so many syubhat that I have, Alhamdulillah with Allah's will, I come across this video and NOW, Alhamdulillah It make absolutely sense. It clear up of all my syubhat that I had Jazakallahu khayran sheikh Uthman, May Allah grant you jannah. - "May Allah unite us upon Quran, Sunnah and the way of salafulummah" (like sheikh Uthman said in closing of this video) ❤ -

[@5Pillars]

As salaamu alaykum brothers, sisters, friends and foes. Please like, share and comment on this video, as well as subscribing to the 5Pillars KZbin channel! Jazakallah khayran.

[@genuinerf4868]

Why allow this lying jaahil lie on Aimma of Islam?

[@MAli99923]

And when the fitnah (trial, discord) occurred in the time of ʿUthmān, some people said to Usāmah bin Zayd , ‘Will you not speak to ʿUthmān?’ So he said, ‘Do you think that I have not spoken to him, just because you have not heard it from me? Verily I will speak to him concerning what is between him and me, without opening an affair which I would not like to be the first to open.’ [An authentic narration: Related by Ahmad (3/403) and Ibn Abī ʿĀsim (2/521) So when they (the Khārijites) opened it, evil took place in the time of ʿUthmān . They opposed ʿUthmān openly, thus completing the tribulations, fighting and corruption, which has not ceased to affect the people to this day, was brought about. And this caused the tribulation to occur between ʿAlī and Muʿāwiyah, and ʿUthmān was killed for these reasons …

[@YA-do8tz]

و عليك السلام و رحمة الله و بركاته

[@shoislam2729]

On the issue of rebelling against rulers, I can respect the fact the shaykh did not blanketly deny its permissibility, like so many of these madkhalis, however he didn't make it clear what the conditions of rebellion and also criticism of rulers are. If this is something he studied in fiqh then it should be relatively easy to give an overview in this podcast, we will see if he does it in a second podcast...

[@maazmustafa2322]

Bro as always, such issues usually lie between the 2 extremes. I haven't seen that part yet where the sheikh said this, but my gut feel says on this matter the truth is somewhere in between what madkhalis and what Haqiqatjou and his gang say. Sheikh ibn uthaymeen actually said it was permissible but mentioned clear conditions. Its on the masjid dar us sunnah channel. A VERY CLEAR, PRECISE video mentioning 4-5 conditions

[@biggytough2586]

Ka’b ibn ‘Ujrah reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Verily, rulers will come after me and whoever enters their audience, affirms their lies, and supports their oppression, they are not part of me and I am not part of them. They will have no presence at the Fountain. Whoever does not enter their audience, does not support their oppression, and does not affirm their lies, he is part of me and I am part of him. He will be present at the Fountain.” Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 2190 Grade: Sahih (authentic)

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

@shoIslam - why is your name show Islam? Do you advice ppl to be open with Islam. If do good but be accurate in speech. Also you error on so called Madkhalis, they say you can rebel but has conditions... too

[@amdol]

Do you not see what happened to the muslim countries recently that revolt the leader? Now they are dead, and the same people who revolt want them back. Crying because the life was better.

[@shoislam2729]

@@amdol the problem is they understood the problem but not the cure. They needed to replace the leadership with an Islamic caliphate and not another secular democratic regime.

[@shaikhimi6458]

It is the mainly Salafi movement that have caused significant division's in the UK. No hanafi has ever gone to a Shafi and telling them they are deviant and need to follow 'quran & sunnah'. They have casues mass confusion and fitna amkngst the youth from the 1990's in the Uk.

[@aklimurraza2626]

I don’t think that’s true at all. No salafi goes around calling followers of the madahib deviants.. the only people they call deviants when applies to aqeedah which is a whole different topic.

[@shaikhimi6458]

@@aklimurraza2626 Sorry brother but you must be living under a rock if you think that is the case. I reside in Birmingham and since the the late 80's , we had literally salafis, almost militant into thier approach in our areas going around speaking to the youth telling them ridiculous things like imam Abu Hanifa only knew 40 hadiths ! Stating they are not following quran and sunnah. I have seen and experienced this personally so please stop with the nonsense

[@ragpaysever2260]

​@@shaikhimi6458they still do it

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

​@@shaikhimi6458 Some so called hanafis said a Shafii man can't marry a hanafi sister... like what?

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

​@@ragpaysever2260 4 mathhabs are Athari in Aqida & salafi in fiq... what's Numan's mom's mathhab? what is difference in Usul of 4 mathhab in fiq? Imam Ahmad made tabdi on kulabis who taught Mid life Hasan Ashari before he repented to Athari, proof he wrote Usul Dayana affirmed by Asakir, Dhahabi & I think Bayhaqi.

[@jeliy_]

alhamdulillah i met this sheikh during one of his trips to mosque in scotland, asked about criticising of the saudi rulers. He had a good reply

[@AB-xx7hy]

What did he say?

[@MAli99923]

@@AB-xx7hy And when the fitnah (trial, discord) occurred in the time of ʿUthmān, some people said to Usāmah bin Zayd , ‘Will you not speak to ʿUthmān?’ So he said, ‘Do you think that I have not spoken to him, just because you have not heard it from me? Verily I will speak to him concerning what is between him and me, without opening an affair which I would not like to be the first to open.’ [An authentic narration: Related by Ahmad (3/403) and Ibn Abī ʿĀsim (2/521) So when they (the Khārijites) opened it, evil took place in the time of ʿUthmān . They opposed ʿUthmān openly, thus completing the tribulations, fighting and corruption, which has not ceased to affect the people to this day, was brought about. And this caused the tribulation to occur between ʿAlī and Muʿāwiyah, and ʿUthmān was killed for these reasons …

[@ChErRyaVe20pK]

Bro don't leave us hanging like that 😂

[@sammu]

Man, season 3 is off to an amazing start

[@DawahDigital]

Ya know that bro!!!,

[@AliKhan-jr9cd]

May Allah preserve shaykh uthmaan

[@MonkeyChops82]

Ameen.

[@mohamedshaafi9581]

Sheikh I am a Maldivian , love this podcast, n if you want to know if you want to a maldivian you have to be a muslim as far as I know n the country by law is an Islamic country. Hope you vist there soon😊

[@irfanmohd091]

Very informative podcast brother. Learnt a lot

[@nazmulslater8398]

I want to see examples of Muslims critisizing rulers from the west that resulted in bloodshed in Muslim Countries.

[@biggytough2586]

They are just fear mongering, it was just a dumb argument.

[@aklimurraza2626]

They don’t have the guts bro unfortunately.. scared they’ll be called terrorists. What a joke

[@human0_0skull]

Have you ever heard about the Arab Spring and how it was influenced by the Arab diaspora (mainly) on social media like Facebook or Reddit? Or were you too busy painting the walls of your cave?

[@aklimurraza2626]

@@human0_0skull must have been in that cave you’re talking about

[@nazmulslater8398]

@@human0_0skull akhi speak respectfully and show good manners, your meant to love me for the sake of Allah. The Arabs in those nations used social medias themselves to organise and take part in the Arab Spring. In Egypt, Tunisia there wasn't bloodshed, Libya has conspiracy theories surrounding it.

[@juliankelley6253]

Masha Allah, may Allah preserve brother Uthman. Very beneficial talk.

[@ManlykeRehan]

Wallahi, Shaykh Uthman does some really good work and is really the Lion of the Ummah in the West.

[@aibel99]

I love this guy. May bless his him abundanlty for his efforts. And you too dilly.

[@zoldyckphantom5842]

Mashaallah my respect for sheikh uthman gets bigger every time i watch him

[@ferrijubair9954]

I know Shaykh Uthman personally and he is one of the most amazing, humble, caring people on Earth. One of my favorite human beings and teachers.

[@MaryamAsksr]

Masha’Allaah shaykh uthman dealt with the questions. You can’t be concerned that the rulers of Muslim countries are kaffir but your living under a kafir ruler in the UK 😂 🇬🇧

[@faraz007]

MashAllah Barakallah, may Allah swt bless this ummah and the people striving for goodness and the pleasure of Allah swt

[@AbdelAzizAlih]

I love listening to Shaykh Uthman. Clear, methodical, and always based upon evidence.

[@gems8167]

Yes. Alhamdulillah.

[@HumbleServantofAllah642]

I love to listen to anyone who speaks the truth and brings evidence. Where is the evidence in what he said? Daniel made a video responding to this. Walahi it is depressing to see muslims engaged in this.

[@m4fital2]

​@@HumbleServantofAllah642 Uthman makes clear mistakes. The problem is he reads books with no teacher smh

[@TheBlackCaptain1990]

@@m4fital2 no teacher?? don't about someone when u never really know them akhi.

[@hassanuddin7257]

Amazing podcast. I love sheik Uthman and our brother Dilly for his amazing work. I am waiting for the 2nd part of the podcast.

[@Miftahuddin82]

Mashallah a very calm and uniting discussion. Just what we needed after the last Talk with Daniel Haqiqatjou didn't go well.

[@MisterSolitude]

Which talk

[@sadeeqali8068]

Daniels has made a video as it seems like Uthman bin farooq is lying yet again. kzbin.info/www/bejne/bp63pJuGl8t-sNk

[@mizzyuk8697]

​@@MisterSolitudekzbin.info/www/bejne/gIaukIaIo7eJbaMsi=4CHylinc62OZUXbP

[@RabiaElizabeth]

My first time listening to Shaykh Uthman and I’m blessed to do so. Jazakallah khair.

[@Basheer245]

Al-hamdulillah. Amazing guest you have here.

[@sadaleismail8114]

Ma shaa Allah, may Allah bless both of you, one of the most intellectual podcast I have watched, love and respect.

[@nhalikul]

Masha Allah, very good interview. Thanks for clarifying on Daniel’s discussion, I have great respect now for YQ and Sheikh Uthman the both of them from different positions show sincere intentions to unite the Ummah. Ya Rabb, grant us Aafia 🤲🏾

[@longegg-wind9577]

Umm did you not hear the part where he mentioned sheikh Karim Abuzaid’s refutation on Yasir Qadhi? I think you should go watch that akhi May Allah bless you

[@kabhussain3113]

@@longegg-wind9577 , Karim abuzaid is another boot licker.

[@ahmedyamani7388]

I’m still unclear on that cuz at the event DH clearly told him that he would’ve preferred to be contacted privately on those questions. One of them must be lying.

[@sammu]

@@ahmedyamani7388 Brother don’t accuse fellow Muslim brothers of potentially lying. There was some sort of misunderstanding and we should move on. Don’t let it distract us.

[@ahmedyamani7388]

@@sammu Brother both of them have been exposed lying at different times. This is nothing new, so me claiming that one of them has to have lied here is not a stretch giving the contradictions displayed. Also everyone must be held to account, esp brothers with big platforms. We can’t just dismiss and sweep everything under the carpet.

[@qmr0n]

Much respect, Shaykh Uthmaan! الله يحفظك

[@the_one1001]

This was an excellent episode, you really did your homework Dilly and asked precise, need to know questions He was very clear and we ended up seeing an authentic unequivocal discussion

[@sikandermahmood7806]

Masha Allah fantastic interview. Full of very very important information regarding the situation of the ummah. She is very learned but also very humble. Great man

[@getout0101]

Not ruling by the laws of Allah is considered Major Kufr according to many Scholars, so it’s not a condition that one expresses their disbelief verbally, also the view that we don’t live in those lands and therefore we shouldn’t comment on their affairs is incorrect since we are one Ummah and what happens around the World concerns us and affects Muslims in different ways both economically and politically, but he’s correct in that the right procedure should be followed in addressing the matter, unfortunately what we see in the Muslim lands is sad from both the ruling governments and the people.

[@pursueexcellence7737]

My scholar, ibn Abbas رضي الله عنه said it is Kufr less than Kufr (I.e. minor kufr.).

[@biggytough2586]

Ka’b ibn ‘Ujrah reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Verily, rulers will come after me and whoever enters their audience, affirms their lies, and supports their oppression, they are not part of me and I am not part of them. They will have no presence at the Fountain. Whoever does not enter their audience, does not support their oppression, and does not affirm their lies, he is part of me and I am part of him. He will be present at the Fountain.” Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 2190 Grade: Sahih (authentic) according

[@SalafLB]

Do you, your acquaintances, and the generality of myslim laymen rule by what Allah has ordered in your own homes these days?.. Hmm, yet here we are NOT making takfir on Muslims based on that. The rulers are a reflection of our own inner state as muslims. You want umar in charge act like those under umar at his time. We can complain all day, but NOTHING will change until we take accountability and apply the shari'ah to ourselves. There is no denying that there's corruption in land, but who is it to blame really? We've turned away from the shari'ah and we act like it isnt our fault.

[@getout0101]

@@pursueexcellence7737 that saying is well known from ibn Abbas (RA) but it’s context doesn’t apply to the one who makes laws to govern and judge the people in the land, what you are quoting is to do with judging in a matter away from the shariah, ie, not applying the command of Allah in a particular matter or so, not in cases where the actual laws are codified and are contrary to that of the shariah, this distinction is well known,

[@pursueexcellence7737]

@@getout0101 Who before you preceded in this (wishy-washy) distinction of the difference between it being kufr Akbar and As-ghar being "judging in the land" and "judging in a particular matter"? Because there are over 30 salaf who have reported ijmaa' that a father not ruling by the ruling of Allah by allowing his child to have a girlfriend is commiting major kufr when he believes Allah has not made it haram, otherwise, it is only a sin.

[@ebadkhan7916]

May Allah protect Shaykh Uthman and brother Dily

[@ItoSorich]

His trying

[@MuhammadBinZafar1]

This was the loveliest and the most awaited discussion for me. My beloved Shaykh Uthman wearing cool 😎 1:34:00 I ask Allah to preserve him and reward him immensely for his knowledge and his works and his tireless efforts day in day out. Love you for the sake of Allah, Shaykh ❤ Furthermore, beloved brother Dilly Hussain - I almost forgot - may Allah reward you for being neutral and impartial yet again for hosting this discussion. As you did in the past between Shaykh Israr and Shaykh Abdurrahman. Some people are good at being neutral? 😂

[@raheelaali9767]

We are truly blessed to have shiekhs like this. May Allah SWT reward Shiekh Uthman in abundance Allahumma Ameen ❤

[@qutuz9495]

I love sh Uthman. May Allah protect him and bless his work. The podcast was very beneficial as well msA. I'd really look forward to a 2nd podcast to drill down into the political side. While it's very clear in Islam that we shouldn't rebel against our rulers for oppression alone, we can definitely criticise them. Umar ibn Al'Khattab himself was criticised and allowed it. Imam Ahmed in Hanbal publicly spoke out against the fitna of khalq al-Quran. There are many other examples. However, rebellion is a different issue. The question here should be, is a ruler that actively *hates* Islam and Muslims still a Muslim ruler worth obeying? A ruler who's sole purpose is to shut down any and all Muslim work? At the end of the day, those who say rebellion is haram would still follow those who rebelled if their revolution is successful even if they think it's haram to do so.

[@wakemeup38]

Much of the salaf rebelled and fought against the rulers FOR OPPRESSION. For example Abdullah ibn Amr was being oppressed by having his property taken away by the Ummayyad rulers and when asked by someone to just let it go so he wouldn't die, he replied with the famous statement of the Prophet (saw) : "Whoever is killed defending his wealth, he is a martyr". There are many more examples from the tabieen who were in constant battles against the Ummayyads for their oppression The secular rulers of today that are consistently dismantling the Sharia and oppressing Muslims by killing and imprisoning them are much worse than the Ummayyads or Abbasids or Ottomans

[@Moondayfootballacademy]

@@wakemeup38 what do you think criticism will lead to? you dont know what you are talking about

[@raffatperveen3150]

We all agree on the unity of all Muslim ln Sha Allah

[@josephy4525]

The legend! 🙌🏽

[@zarnoshk1202]

MashAllah, Great work Brother Dilly. Great talk from Sheikh Uthman…

[@Melhimri]

I appreciate Sheikh Uthman and his desire to bring the ummah together. That being said, I find something very wrong with his stance on criticizing rulers. He switched back and forth between Khalifa and ruler. Then when he said "why don't you go to those countries and say the same thing" and the brother responded "well they will arrest and kill me", the sheikh responded "exactly". So we are just supposed to be completely silent (as the oppressors want) while they arrest and torture our scholars? While they sell out to the west? As they work with foreign intelligence agencies against the Muslims? As they destabilize other countries, installing and propping up more oppressors? Changing the school curriculum to pervert the masses? Introducing fitnah where it didnt exist before? All while inviting foreign soldiers to establish themselves on your land? If the argument is that blood will be shed, my response is that blood has already been shed and is being shed. I'm not saying that the people in any specific country should just get up and start fighting the government, but calling it out seems like a reasonable first step.

[@MAli99923]

And when the fitnah (trial, discord) occurred in the time of ʿUthmān, some people said to Usāmah bin Zayd , ‘Will you not speak to ʿUthmān?’ So he said, ‘Do you think that I have not spoken to him, just because you have not heard it from me? Verily I will speak to him concerning what is between him and me, without opening an affair which I would not like to be the first to open.’ [An authentic narration: Related by Ahmad (3/403) and Ibn Abī ʿĀsim (2/521) So when they (the Khārijites) opened it, evil took place in the time of ʿUthmān . They opposed ʿUthmān openly, thus completing the tribulations, fighting and corruption, which has not ceased to affect the people to this day, was brought about. And this caused the tribulation to occur between ʿAlī and Muʿāwiyah, and ʿUthmān was killed for these reasons …

[@Melhimri]

@pvcrma1 I understand, but what is the solution? Do we sit back and stay quiet while the ummah deteriorates? Our children continue being brainwashed in schools? Countries being destabilized? I'm not suggesting armed conflict. I'm not even claiming to have an answer, but is saying that allowing Halloween celebrations in the Arabian peninsula haram too far? Is saying that the rulers allowing clubs and bars in the land of the sahaba are wrong for doing so, being a khariji? Is speaking out against arresting, torturing, and executing scholars equivalent to calling for violence? I don't think so. Sitting silent and hoping for the best doesn't seem like an intelligent solution. If the people there know it but are unable to speak because of a direct threat of arrest or death, the rest of us have to be silent? If you run your country in such a way, armed rebellion is a NATURAL result. This is a rule that has been seen time and time again in history. Muslim lands or not.

[@MAli99923]

@@Melhimri The solutions are many: - 01. Learn Aqeedah - 02. Return to the Sunnah - 03. Repentance - 04. Go back to the way of companions - 05. Change our condition [13.11] Let us be realistic. The masaajid are practically empty and the potential of the Muslims are only seen on Fridays/Ramadaan/Eed etc. We want victory whilst we are far away from the deen of Allaah! Does that even make sense?

[@Melhimri]

@pvcrma1 that all sounds nice and I'm not discounting it. But, again, our scholars are being locked up. The scholars being promoted by the government are teaching government sponsored Islam. The companions challenged the oppressive rulers on many (and I mean MANY occasions). Many of our most famous scholars were arrested and tortured for publicly disagreeing with leaders. Let me just summarize the situation. The leaders are pushing the population into more and more western ways: introducing clubs, concerts, gambling, bars, mixed events, etc. They are also jailing, torturing, and killing anyone who criticizes them. Then you have a group of people who are saying criticizing them is haram and you are a khariji if you do it. The way of Islam is not to just sit at home and pray. It's قول و عمل. You speak and take action. The Prophet (pbuh) praised speaking a word of truth to a tyrant. If we just sit at home and pray (which was not the way of the Prophets or the companions), and forget about enjoining good and forbidding evil, you are just as blameworthy as the leader. Recall the hadith when Allah was going to destroy a city and the angels said there was a faithful man amongst them. Allah called for his destruction first. Go read about the sahaba and how they openly criticized Hajjaj ibn Yusuf on multiple occasions.

[@samroonisinnari]

@@MAli99923jazakAllahu khairan for your concise answer. We often forget that to change a situation, we must change ourselves. Speaking out against rulers will change nothing, the best is to focus on yourself and leave the rest to Allah (سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى)

[@arbabk]

Sheikh Uthman speak with such clarity, simplicity, and kindness Alhumdulilah he is a blessing for the English speaking audience. May Allah bless him for all of his work.

[@Matteo8136n]

Subhan'Allah you will never find A true Muslim speak ill of his Muslim brother in public, no matter what happens, not to revile him or insult him. And if he finds a mistake or false information from him in the deen , then he corrects the matter without mentioning his name.... This is the path of our Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him, the companions,and the our salaf .. Now you find many who claim to be a Salafi while They even don't know what his Muslim brother right upon him !! backbites and hurts his Muslim brother, making a whole videos about only to convince ppl to get rid of him! Almost making him a kaifer!! Acting like they have good attantion! When they do nothing but fitnah and divided the ummah, they Only use the word Salafi to justify what they doing! May Allah deal them all.

[@HumbleServantofAllah642]

ameen. unfortunately this is what we see today, bashing each other on a super public platform, these are serving themselves not Allah

[@AB-xi9im]

making public amr bilma3ruh nahi 3an al-munkar is permissible and was done by the salaf

[@kb4432]

"When Muslims will curse each other in public" This is one of the signs before day of judgment that will invite Allah's anger and lead to the destruction of the muslims. Your correct brother. The people of Iman control their anger and refrain from such backbiting/slandering of their Muslim brethren. Alhamdulillah, Salafists only makeup less than 2 percent of the Ummah, but they are platformed online and have incredible amounts of money at their disposal. I fear for the Ummah

[@HumbleServantofAllah642]

@@AB-xi9im be exactly like a salaf, then go out and expose your brother. you cannot even pray like the salaf, fast like the salaf and you want to publicly criticize like the salaf, possibly this is what lead syrians to the complete disintegration of their nationm you still didn't learn from other's mistakes and you want badly to reproduce their same mistakes, walahi ajaeeb

[@AB-xi9im]

@@HumbleServantofAllah642 what is this gibberish type english

[@i.1303]

1:26:39 The answer of the sheikh is very very dangerous. Accusing Ulamaa who are imprisoned is NOT ok! Hasbounallahou wa ni’mal wakeel.

[@i.1303]

And accusing all activists is NOT ok neither!

[@i.1303]

Where are your HUJJAJ of these imprisoned people in the muslim world that they have taken the g&uns on the streets ???

[@Sharukh-ze4dh]

Are you talking about Salman owdah

[@mohammedismail7150]

Masha Allah!!! That was neat!!! Thoroughly enjoyed it. Have great respect for Shaykh uthman. May Allah guide us all and keep us steadfast. Ameen.

[@shafieakhan1781]

5pillars didn’t do justice in this podcast. Uthman Farooq challenged the thoughts of deobandis again and is refusing to sit with deobandis yet claims to be willing to sit with them. To question the aqeedah of great scholars isn’t a light matter and needs to be challenged. Talk about unity is cheap when you don’t back it up

[@luvlybaluga]

He is unfortunately like most wahabi/salafi/najdis T_T. May Allah unite us all. Ameen.

[@alsalman007tube]

Deobandis do have a very little part that is no way related to Islam, I can vouch for it being a south Indian Muslim and living in a community encircled with people from nizamuddin markaz. The book they read is so called fazaile aamal contains lot more made up stories than discussing about sahee hadiths. May Allah protect and guide us all.. Aameen

[@Aban234]

@@alsalman007tube 😂 stop. Go read insha allah

[@Durray13]

@@khairt1731 jahil spotted 🚨

[@salim9546]

He said there are many different kinds of Deobandis and he didn't generalize. Didn't you listen to the podcast?

[@adamsalah3507]

May Allah bless Shaykh Uthman

[@Apricotblossom5555]

Many of these comments hurt to read. Have shame people!! This is your brother, a very respectable brother at that subhan Allah! yet you call him names and critisize him. If this is how you treat a fellow muslim, i wouldn’t dare think how you'd treat an enemy.

[@shoislam2729]

Calling names, I agree maybe not but Shaykh Uthman and all scholars of Islam are fallible thus are not above criticism

[@Durray13]

jahil spotted 🚨@@khairt1731

[@ashaqhussain6902]

He should not delve in issues that there is legitimate disputation and seek to sow discord and disunity.

[@aq9871]

Alhamdulillah for Islam

[@mohpat9989]

May Allah bless the Ulema of Deoband who upon the Quran and Sunnah

[@Hbchnhdfjjjas5483]

Ameen

[@Dont-worry1618]

They are not upon the quran and sunnah

[@maisamsadigi1658]

Than why so many bidaah comes from them

[@Dont-worry1618]

@@maisamsadigi1658 Ikr

[@maxkak2149]

Brother Dilly , very rarely u have disappointed in this interview.

[@peaceful_warrior7627]

Masha Allah, may Allah bless and guide you both.

[@043ash]

In all respect... He's incorrect...imam Maliks usool is that he would give preferrence to Amal ahle madinah over a saheeh hadeeth that has singular narration . Also this was not the dawah of the 90s and early 2000... The salafis would denounce following Madhab completely ...some of the super salafis as they were known back then would call Umar a biddati...Inna lillahi...for the ijtihad of 20 rakas

[@peaceful_warrior7627]

@@043ash i dunno brother

[@MasoodKhan-so9hv]

Usman said don’t criticize the ruler publicly from 1:17 only privately again this is also been debunked by bro Hajji of how the salaf criticized the ruler publicly not privately

[@musfiqurkashem346]

What Bro Hajji said was debunked too. Bro Hajji doesn't know

[@hamzanocap]

You're openly quoting a Khariji? Subhanallah, fear Allah.

[@Defeatzeus]

Bro Hajji is a Deobandi His whole existence revolves around fighting Madkhalis.

[@MAli99923]

And when the fitnah (trial, discord) occurred in the time of ʿUthmān, some people said to Usāmah bin Zayd , ‘Will you not speak to ʿUthmān?’ So he said, ‘Do you think that I have not spoken to him, just because you have not heard it from me? Verily I will speak to him concerning what is between him and me, without opening an affair which I would not like to be the first to open.’ [An authentic narration: Related by Ahmad (3/403) and Ibn Abī ʿĀsim (2/521) So when they (the Khārijites) opened it, evil took place in the time of ʿUthmān . They opposed ʿUthmān openly, thus completing the tribulations, fighting and corruption, which has not ceased to affect the people to this day, was brought about. And this caused the tribulation to occur between ʿAlī and Muʿāwiyah, and ʿUthmān was killed for these reasons …

[@ashaqhussain6902]

Salaafi Aqeedah is you cannot criticise MBS. You can criticise rulers like Morsi who have some ghayrah for the Deen.

[@nasirsagara]

Jazakallahu khair for such a knowledgeable and beneficial podcast, As always sheikh rocks

[@Jinan9Dec]

JazakAllah khair

[@shafieakhan1781]

Brother Dilly should’ve asked him about Shaykh Yasir Al-Hanafi responding to his invitation to sit with ulema

[@MilahanPhilosophersCorner]

Insightful. Mashaallah.

[@uniqueviewsnews]

The problem are the Madkhalis and many false Muslim rulers, do you not get that?

[@muslimresponse103]

the problem is arrogance coupled with ignorance towards the Quran and sunnah.

[@Figleaf-Bicarbonate]

​@@muslimresponse103How do you feel about MBS buying a picture of Isa (AS) for millions? Also making the adhaan lowered and opening clubs?

[@muslimresponse103]

@@Figleaf-Bicarbonatehow do you feel about your own sins and disregarding the Quran and sunnah to follow your own emotions and feelings?!

[@nod.coffee]

@@Figleaf-Bicarbonate MBS is not infallible nor should he be judged with such a standard. First of all you don't know his intentions, it could be to purchase it so that it isn't on public display, seeing as the painting was supposed to be shown at a gallery in Abu Dhabi in 2018 but since MBS purchased it, nobody has laid eyes upon it to the public's knowledge since 2017. Making the volume of adhaan was in response to complaints from citizens, so your qualm on that issue is with the residents, not the one acting on ther complaints, and lowering the max volume affects someone's deen how? Does it go in the Qur'aan and Sunnaah to lower the volume of the adhaan? Aren't we supposed to be a considerate people? If everyone recited at the top of their lungs during salah nobody in the masjid would be able to concentrate. The clubs opening, I can only find news on a club opening in Jeddah in 2019, which the GEA of SA stated they did not authorise, but rather the organisers took advantage of a license granted for a different event altogether to open the club. So everything is not as it seems. Either way, it should be removed but again, that shouldn't effect your ability to practise your religion and be the best Muslim you can be. BaarakAllaahu feekum.

[@Aman_Hanbali]

@@Figleaf-BicarbonateHow about you worried about your sister, your mom and dad at home. Why do you stretch your hand where it doesn’t reach?🤷🏽‍♂️ Does knowing him bought the picture increases your eman?? How about you leave things that concern you and focus on things that concern you. Just know that I love you for the sake of Allah.❤️❤️

[@waheeb_m]

Wow this brother really impressed me. May Allah help him spread the deen.

[@MrRiz157]

Try getting a proper Hanabli scholar on, that would be better and beneficial.

[@emreyldrim]

Hanbali scholar not the Wahhabis

[@Durray13]

jahil spotted 🚨 @khairt1731

[@bnamallan6082]

Well he should try and get you instead...so that we will see what you have

[@emreyldrim]

I'm not hanbali I'm shafii asharii. So I love hanbali and their schoolers. Not the khashawia(خشوية) like ibn taymiyya, Abdullah ibn abdulwahhab, ibn favzan, etc.

[@bnamallan6082]

@@emreyldrim so put in taymiyyah,ibn Kathir,imamul mizzi,ibnl qayyim,imamu thahabi put the in hell fire then and call them names since they don't subscribe ur own understanding of the religion

[@عبدالله-ن6ه2ص]

My brother, I have been following you for years. I think that Sheikh Othman dealt with some of the problems that some young Muslims fall into in the West. I think that the political journalist Salman Al-Ansari will be the best guest after Sheikh Othman bin Al-Faruq to talk about politics in the Middle East and how Muslim rulers deal with imperial powers. In the Western world, and how the Arab peoples deal specifically with the rulers, and the position of the Arab peoples towards the Muslim Brotherhood, as well as the Turkish, Persian and Zionist ambitions in the Arab world, as well as the reasons for the emergence of Al Qaeda and ISIS in the Islamic world, and how we build an Islamic civilization that advances among the countries of the civilized world. It is possible to talk about issues such as the Palestinian, Libyan, Yemeni, Syrian and Iraqi issues, and how Muslim rulers deal with them according to the law of security and political interest. And what hinders Muslims from scientific, civilizational, and military progress, etc.? And our problems are with the donkeys of colonialism and with the slaves of the occupiers, and they are known to every scholar of politics. Likewise, the problem of Islamic countries with left-liberal extremism in Western media and politics Likewise, how do we confront the media demonizing Islam in all means of channels and social communication that are led by international channels in the Western world, and many countries of the world copy Western news in Japan, Korea, etc.. Sharing your views with journalist Salman Al-Ansari will clarify a lot of understanding of the political reality as it is, and not as we dream or want to do it.

[@mukkimerc856]

MashaAllah very good and conscience explanation to all the questions brother dilly posed may Allah bless ustad Uthman Ibn Farooq. We need well educated and well spoken knowledgeable people giving dawah. People who give dawah please stop dividing the ummah and start explaining your points with wisdom and knowledge without the pantomime and theatrics its getting unbearable now.

[@nygelb198]

Cant wait for the second one

[@aliriaz3654]

Amazing and really useful podcast.

[@zakariab9591]

As a defending for the Ottomans (as a non Turk): The Ottoman khulafa were highly educated and had really good Islamic education. Not only them, but their whole administration. The ulama had a lot of power and could prevent the khalifa from decisions.

[@mnuhs5]

“Look at evidences”, you have your evidences, the other side has theirs.

[@dcanebreezy5784]

wdym by you have your evidences & other side has theirs ? Is adopting Greek philosophy is what Rassoul Allah, Sahaba, Tabeen & four imams were on ? People of desires & innovation will never change.

[@mnuhs5]

@@dcanebreezy5784the day you can explain to me that you are not even 2% of the Muslim population and the rest are on the sunnah are wrong I will give you time to speak. Otherwise without knowledge, listening to a few speeches - do not talk.

[@dcanebreezy5784]

Again, most lay muslims are not aware of deep creedle issue so you rubbish unstatistics are not real. do u know islam more than Sahaba ? Quboori@@mnuhs5

[@dcanebreezy5784]

Even sufi in my country knows that Allah swt is above his creation on his throne. Do u know that old ashairah believed that too ? :) won't waste my time with 2% rubbish stats ignorant@@mnuhs5

[@Karayel111]

Daniel Haqiqatjou has answered about the stuff that was discussed about him

[@uniqueviewsnews]

And were Saudi worried about Aqidah in Algeria, Egypt and Yemen?

[@-Ahmed8592]

@NejadIhsanBeliefs, theology

[@muslimresponse103]

who is Saudi?

[@-Ahmed8592]

@NejadIhsan I agree. In fact linguistically Aqeedah ends up meaning a contract between us and Allah in terms of the beliefs we hold, with the correct ones ending in Jannah and the false ones in Jahannam.

[@TruthForbidden-ku3qg]

May Allah Reward Sheikh Uthman, Brother Dilly & all at 5 Pillars Is there a Hadith which says, IF RIBA BECOMES WIDE SPREAD IN MUSLIM LANDS ….It becomes COMPULSORY FOR EVERY MUSLIM MAN AND WOMAN MUST PERFORM JIHAD Until it is Removed…? Barak Allah o Fiqom…

[@hhawler]

May Allah bless you sheikh Uthman ❤

[@ImperfectAngel-hs5dk]

Absolutely loved this Alhamdulillah. We are blessed to be able to attend this discussion. Jzk khair blessed brothers

[@e.k874]

Imam Malik didn’t obey the rulers so he was almost beat to death and imprisoned

[@vol94]

Imam Ahmad Bin Hanbal too, when he opposed the mutazili rulers asking him to declare that the Quran is created.

[@e.k874]

@@vol94 and Hussain ibn Ali didnt obey Yazeed so whats this nonsense u must obey the ruler

[@dr.mohamedal-qenawy481]

The point is that They didn't obey the ruler when they asking them somthing against islamic laws. So if the ruler asked them somthing with no Islamic conflict then they have to obey him as mentioned in Qur'an and Sunnah.

[@adrenalin4122]

@@e.k874you have to obey the rulers when they rule with sharia and not with democracy and as long as he doesn’t order you to do something which is haram (like i Imam Maliks time) or Shirk/Kuffr (like in Imam Ahmads time)

[@e.k874]

hell no i will not obey the munafiq zionest lover arab rulers of UAE BAHrain etc @@adrenalin4122

[@Boot_14]

People in comments are jokes, judging the dude on anything and everything, you guys should focus on your own lives and if its that important to you maybe you should go put in the work like these dudes and then get on a podcast and say what you gotta say. go fix yourselves. Bunch of scholars in the comments .

[@SlaveofAllahhh]

💯

[@musfiqurkashem346]

I know right. No one is infallible at the end of the day. Shiekh Uthman says he is a student of knowledge at the end of the day. Arrogance has just increased with the internet and keyboard warriors. No one actually is humble enough to sit down with a scholar and learn from them. Anyone taking knowledge for the sake of Allah become more humble, any other motives and they became arrogant.

[@baran1455]

May Allah reward you brother Dilly for bringing the case of brother Daniel's "inqusition". That scene had really left a bitter taste at us,it was really unnecessary putting brother Daniel into that situation.

[@muslimresponse103]

Daniel put himself in that situation.

[@wally86_]

Daniel put himself in that situation and got schooled

[@saadm5732]

​@@ABC-wi6vt😂😂

[@maazmustafa2322]

Don't think it was unnecessary at all. It was better. Only ones who feel bad are hard-core Daniel fanboys. He was brought on stage to clarify his own stance to us laymen. That's what it was - a clarification IN HIS OWN words but fanboys understood it to be a humiliation of Daniel. The last part of Daniel taking shahadah with a salafi touch was just added as a light hearted joke to calm down super salafis

[@iamzimj6724]

​@@wally86_sorry brother, I doubt that. Everyone could clearly see Br Daniel schooled the panel trying to question him. The 'Sheikhs' tried to put Deobandis under the bus, but they got schooled about that also.

[@AbdulRaajihKhan-xy6hr]

SubhanAllah.... Questioner Got NO-*Chill for a Second* to Him... Lol * He Went RIGHT INTO Questions that Brothers who have BEEN Practicing Islam for DECADES Wouldn't Ask/ Concern themselves with. * Good in a Way * Then Again - Not So Good (in a Way,) ---------- Either-Way : It Is Allah(swt) That Guides Men & Women to the Straight Path. AlHumdulillah

[@biggytough2586]

Daies should just admit that almost all Muslim Ruler have not implemented the Shariah and are guilty of Istibdal(replacing the laws of Allah with other kufr secular laws and system) and Istihlal (Make halal what Allah made Haraam and Vice versa) which are MAJOR KUFR, BUT we are unable to remove them Physically and the harm outweighs the good hence we should not rebel. This could have been an honest point of view rather trying directly or INDIRECTLY trying to defend these rulers. Your gonna be questioned for that on the day of Judgement.

[@MAli99923]

And when the fitnah (trial, discord) occurred in the time of ʿUthmān, some people said to Usāmah bin Zayd , ‘Will you not speak to ʿUthmān?’ So he said, ‘Do you think that I have not spoken to him, just because you have not heard it from me? Verily I will speak to him concerning what is between him and me, without opening an affair which I would not like to be the first to open.’ [An authentic narration: Related by Ahmad (3/403) and Ibn Abī ʿĀsim (2/521) So when they (the Khārijites) opened it, evil took place in the time of ʿUthmān . They opposed ʿUthmān openly, thus completing the tribulations, fighting and corruption, which has not ceased to affect the people to this day, was brought about. And this caused the tribulation to occur between ʿAlī and Muʿāwiyah, and ʿUthmān was killed for these reasons …

[@biggytough2586]

@@MAli99923 So are you Comparing the Khilafah of Uthman RA to the modern day western backed secularist nationalists rulers of the Muslim lands?

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

​​​@@biggytough2586 Are you saying Islam changed?? Also do you know difference between Quran 5.44 - 47... 3 situations where they don't rule by Allah's law but three different rulings?

[@dcanebreezy5784]

I don't think he does know it lol @@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543

[@dcanebreezy5784]

I hope u don't live in the west & criticizing muslim rulers :)@@biggytough2586

[@Addakhel]

It's disappointing seeing Br. Uthman being so close to becoming a madkhali. Doesn't he see how these rulers are LITERALLY fighting Islam? Not only in their countries, internationally! Hasn't Br. Uthman seen the tens of scholars jailed in Saudi for example?

[@Armitage44]

Same notion from my side. He reiterates the Madkhali defence against the rulers.

[@hamzanocap]

Do you deny a clear narration from the Messenger pbuh? Or is your desire to call out the rulers stronger than your submission to Allah and His Prophet? Name calling those of the Sunnah is not new, that is all you people of desires have.

[@Addakhel]

@@hamzanocap The clear narration when the Prophet PBUH says: that the best of martyrs is Hamza, and a man stood up to an oppressive ruler? Or the narration when he PBUH said the Ummah will no longer have any weight/effect if it doesn't say to the oppressor: you are oppressive? (obviously I'm paraphrasing)

[@hamzanocap]

@@Addakhel Was the ruler Hamza stood up to Muslim...?

[@Armitage44]

@@hamzanocap Rulers that dont apply Sharia are Taghut, their outer appearance doesnt matter bro. Wake up brother, its not about calling out rulers. Its about our heartfelt desire to live in an islamic state, with a Muslim ruler that applies the Sharia.

[@AbdulEssa-kp4vf]

I find it amazing how Salaafi constantly mispresent history. 1. For the last 40 years, the pseudo-Salafi movement characterized people who followed Madhab as followers of Bidah and people who rejected clear Quran verses and Hadith. When the person following the madhab was not in a position to judge himself, then became reliant on the interpretation of the Quran and Hadith of the Salafi scholar. Who rejected 1400 years of scholarship. A madhab is a methodology on how to interpret the Quran and Hadith, basically having a consistent approach. 2. Also how do they equate scholars directly with Prophet Muhammad (SAW), are you going to follow the scholar or Prophet Muhammad (SAW), you innovator? 3. Also they constantly fail to mention that Imam Abu Hanifah, and Imam Malik are part of the Salaaf!! Imam Abu Hanifah, was Tabiee Imam Malik was Tabiee Imam Shafee was Tab Tabiee Also, both were contemporaries, i.e Imam Abu Hanifah fled from Kufa to Makkah and would meet Imam Malik in Makkah when he came for Haj. Also how Imam Abu Hanifah sent his students to learn from Imam Malik! Imam Shafee was a student of Imam Malik! Also, Imam Hanbali was a student of Imam Shafee. Also how Imam Hanbali stood up against the Mu'tazila. Also how the Salaafi movement glossed over the attack of Kaba and the killing of Hajis in 1979. By students of Sheikh Abd al-Aziz Ibn Baz, the great recent Salaafi scholar. The same scholar who gave a fatwa permitting the US troops to be stationed in Saudi Arabia Hejaz.

[@AbuZee1]

Well said

[@Thief20]

in 1979 it was the shia persians who attacked in hajj, there had to be a fatwa made to stop thw rioters since the rioters already killed many hujjaj and police officers. u said salafi reject history while ur here misrepresnting history and misleading the ummah as if "The students of ibn baz" started killing randomly. May Allah give you what u deserve.

[@nestorrivera7139]

We can forgive a brother especially like shaykh bin Baz rahimullah..his esteem in the DEEN should be overlook

[@saddiqabubakar6630]

People only want to hear what their heart desire not based on what Quran and sunnah of the prophet based on.

[@alpasy2712]

Asalamualaykum. Peace be upon you all. We need our brothers from other perspectives such as Shamsi and Abu Mussab to come on the Blood Brothers podcast. That would be box office. I think there is great good in these guys. May Allah bless Shaykh Uthman, amazing may Allah accept all our good deeds and erase our bad deeds. Ameen. Big up Dilly, 5 Pillars and the team.

[@suhaibsyed4152]

Difficult to get Shamsi. He only sits with and promotes Salafi speakers. :)

[@Matteo8136n]

Shamsi has deep arrogance will never let Him to seat with alot of Muslims may Allah guide him

[@dcanebreezy5784]

what's wrong with salafi ? Aren't Salafi the ones who follow the Three first gen & against platonic Philosophy of Ashaira & Matruidhi ? Aren't Salafi following Athar of 3 first generation(which are the best generations according to Rassoul Allah ? ) Do modern Ashairah follow Abu hassan Al Ashari ? they oppose alot Aren't Ashairah similar to Jahmiya & Mutazila and many scholars repented from it & went back to Rassoul, Sahaba, Tabeen & 4 imam Aqeeda! Why would anyone follow abu hassan who came after 4 centuries with philosophy and Jahmiya Mutazila beliefs? Who himself repented from Philosophy:) (isn't that what made Nassara trinitarians ? by following philosophers who came after centuries ?) you never lean. Same with Abu Hamad Al Ghazali who dove into greek philosophy & made innovations, kufr beliefs & statements? but repented from it. Al Nawawi repented too. Isn't innovation into our Deen what caused division? Aren't people of desires & innovations who devided The Ummah ?+ hypoctis OFC@@suhaibsyed4152

[@suhaibsyed4152]

@@dcanebreezy5784 bro I am a Salafi myself. I was just telling y Shamsi won’t come to a podast with an Ashari. A daee is not supposed to mix with deviants & be seen by his followers mixing & getting along with people of wrong beliefs. It sends a wrong message & causes confusion amongst the followers & seekers of true path

[@ahmedyamani7388]

59:43 but at the conference DH explicitly told him that it would’ve been nice if he had contacted him privately about these issues. So confused on who’s telling the truth here.

[@mozzjonas9292]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/bp63pJuGl8t-sNksi=p8zib4rp5qu0Yq5u

[@greatcaledonianpenicillin5378]

Really enjoyed this podcast and learnt a lot. Going to stop criticising Muslim rulers as I agree it's not my place to say. Barakallahu Feekum to Shaykh Uthman, OMF, Dilly and the 5Pillars team.

[@KhadijaAmir-f6z]

Can I contact him from email or anything? How can I? I need it sir. I want to understand the true God, please help me

[@d15craxx]

Enjoying good and forbiding evil is the deen of Muhammed and Allah. Sheikh Uthman is wrong here. If the ruler promotes evil, we call it out, he is not our Prophet. Same goes for our parents

[@longegg-wind9577]

Do it in the presence of the ruler the same way you do it in the presence of your parents

[@d15craxx]

@@longegg-wind9577 Of course. And if my parents were public figures i would also make the same statements. This is the deen of the Rasool(PBUH), it's not to be played around with

[@biggytough2586]

Ka’b ibn ‘Ujrah reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Verily, rulers will come after me and whoever enters their audience, affirms their lies, and supports their oppression, they are not part of me and I am not part of them. They will have no presence at the Fountain. Whoever does not enter their audience, does not support their oppression, and does not affirm their lies, he is part of me and I am part of him. He will be present at the Fountain.” Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 2190 Grade: Sahih (authentic)

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

The asl is private, only scholars who understand nuance can criticize in public...

[@Western_war_editz_]

Project guiding Light has very good videos on this issue imo. BarakAllahu Feekum 🏳️🤲🏼☝🏼

[@isramiraj]

I love this Shaykh just regarding ideology, which we have to separate from person. In general modern salafism and the line of scholars he follows. 1) Majority of ummah in Pakistan, Egypt, Syria, West and North and Africa including institutions within teach maturidi or ashari aqeedah. Are all these kufr? Some scolars in Mauriania desert have been teaching with sanad for centuries, jawhar al-tawhid for example. Also many well respected scholars in past zamakshari, fakhr al-din razi were quoted and referred by ulema. 2) Majority in (1) incorporate some form of sufism. Moreover, the modern day post-modernity sufism response with some circles is misrepresentation. Many of the Ottoman Khilafa, Omar al-Mukhtar, Abdul Qadir al-jazairi who fought and raised jihad again colonialist were part of sufi orders. Moreover many sufi or what call pseudo who follow more of a science than blind following to a shaykh are in tabligh jamaat (deoband, however, Ashraf Ali Thanvi has proper sanad, Muhammad Ilyas), west Africa, etc. With proper sanad chain in fiqh, aqeedah, arabic (preserved the arabic language) living the tradition. 2) 'Salafi' scholarship, such as Albani were known to have studied a few books actually hanafi fiqh and his father (Hanafi scholar) advised not to study hadith individually with no chain of sanad, so how can we guarantee authority? Anyone can open hadith and classify and interpret. This means in essence ISIS and modern muslim groups including ahbash, change the qibla, etc. can all be considered salafi as they are basing from Quran and Sunnah? As understand Hadith Scholars were Pharmacists ensuring the hadith narrative was pure and sahih, like a medicine, however, that particular medicine may not apply to a patient. The faqih (doctor) determines based on numerous factors of usool, stated in Quran (qati' absolute or 'dhanni' speculative proofs) hadith mentioned mutawaitr (many narrarators) khabar-ahad (one.nararator) to determine if is Halal, Haram, fardh, makruh (in Hanafi only?), mandub or mubah. Many new rulings were not available at the time so the usool allow us to determine new rulings. For example vaccine, if the components within are not haram, we will not find in quran/hadith, then qiyas (analogy) and muslah mursalah or benefit to society, which, since the vaccine does not contain haraam substance benefit is much greater than effects. Thus makes rulings problematic by not following fiqh and usools of the madhabs and in essence each salafi scholar can have their own madhab. A muhadith like Bukhari to my understanding was not a faqih and yet Salafi scholars shun negative light on Abu Hanifa (direct contact with tabi' tabi'een) form having no knowledge of hadith, when the root memory at the time was common to memorize hadith, however, the faqih laid usool for new rulings not found in quran/hadith based on usool and made it easier for us or the doctor prescription (haram, halal,.fardh,.mandub, Mubarak, etc). Example there is strong sahih in Bukhari book medicine about drinking camel urine, however for cures, no madhab will classify this as fardh! So how can Albani reclassify hadith with no sanad of learning 1400 years later and Abu Hanifa who had direct contact with tabi' tabi'een weak in hadith, obviously there were different considerations for new rulings Abu Hanifa codified via usool to ease and derive new rulings. Similarly taking previous knowledge in general the 'salafi' scholars regard plato, Greek philosophy, etc other 'foreign" or kufr. It was the muslims in the middle ages who considered history of Islam from the beginning of mankind as Islam and any knowledge of previous generations as sacred. Thus Muslims translated the works.of the Greeks and other works, while the church and other faith or movements (mongols) burned them. Hence muslims of middle ages unaffected by modern colonialism and nationalism, amalgated and expanded on previous knowledge understating as all were sacred and some from of divine, all knowledge is from Allah SWT and not the modern colonialist nation state infiltrated 20th century disease of east vs.west or Muslim world vs west kufar, dal al-islam vs dar al-kufr when in fact many Ottoman scholars and others acknowledge Dar.al-sulh, state of treaty as long as peace and agreed treaties are abid!ed, this is why Ottoman at one point had 70 treaties with other nations allowing for trade and even indirectly funding of Italian Renaissance by the venetians trading Egypt. Thus muslims in Spain and Baghdad amalgated knowledge for the Renaissance. From my perspective modern day salafism creates great confusion and misdirection

[@dxxnish7170]

1:13:15 Did Imam Ahmad make specific takfīr on the rulers? Ibn Taymīyyah said: Imam Ahmad (may Allah have mercy on him) would pray for mercy for them, and pray for forgiveness for them, because he knew that it was not clear to them that they were disbelieving in the Messenger (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) and rejecting what he had brought; rather they based their views on the interpretation of some text, but they got it wrong and followed those who taught them that. فالإمام أحمد رحمه الله تعالى ترحم عليهم ، واستغفر لهم ، لعلمه بأنهم لم يتبين لهم أنهم مكذبون للرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم ، ولا جاحدون لما جاء به ، ولكن تأولوا فأخطأوا وقلدوا من قال لهم ذلك . Majmu al-Fatāwa 23/349

[@wakemeup38]

Much of the Salaf did takfir the rulers of their time though. For example Hajjaj ibn Yusuf was takfired by a good chunk of the tabieen

[@tarrasbulba4408]

​@@wakemeup38True that a group of scholars takfired him, and even fought against him. The issue is, he was not THE khalifa but appointed to rule by one. And they had pretty valid reasons to declare kufr on him, not based on ambigious issues. Also, it was a LOCAL ulema who did that, and not someone from the West. However, some scholars say that the actual consensus of not rebelling really was established after the fitnah of Hajjaj bin Yusuf, when muslim scholars realised how much blodshed was spit. So in any case, the happenings with Hajjaj bin Yusuf do not support the view of Kharijjis or those who advocate for rebellion or desobedience of muslim rulers, rather it is an evidence against them. And Allah knows best.

[@Mohammed-bz8lt]

​​@@tarrasbulba4408it's some what silly today to use the "local ulema" argument. We live in a globalised world where there are political commentators and analysts that can tell you in deep detail what the poltical situation is in some place. I also think if you look at the states pushing this line of reasoning,; their own media and ulema do tend to criticise foreign opponents of their state. See for example saudi and Uae criticism of arab rulers who were ikhwan and critiscim of Erdoğan who they desperately wanted to lose in the elections. Moreover in the past some senior salafi scholars have gone as far as criticising and even declaring some Muslim rulers of other lands, disbeleievers

[@wakemeup38]

@@tarrasbulba4408 sorry but this a silly take. You say "follow the salaf"; I say "the salaf rebelled against mutiple Muslim rulers" you say "oh but the ijmaah came later" There is no ijmaah if a huge chunk of the salaf disagree with the opinion. Simple as. You are basically implying that the Salaf were deficient in their understanding of Islam compared to the khalaf. How is this an evidence for your position, I don't think anyone will understand

[@ashaqhussain6902]

Did the rulers of in the Time Of Ahmad ibn Hanbal actively promote Haram and Fahisha and tried to promote Zina amongst them?

[@patriot4786]

Love from Indonesia❤

[@bazmsc]

I remember when i was in uel barking campus, uk in 1994, during univ time our imam was from middle east, and majority of followers were also from middle east, from saudi if not mistaken. They eaten kfc and mcd are just like nothing prohibitted them 🤣🤣🤣. We’re small community of muslim from malaysia didnt follow them but been teasing all the way of not eating kfc mcd and eat aiscream. But all of arab from middle east are pretend to understand islam better than us who is not from arabic speaking country. Alhamdulillah even though muslim from malaysia is not arabic speaking country but we adhere strictly to our understanding that we learnt in school that give yr best to find halal food so staying in east london during that time wasn’t hard to find halal meat and chicken but i have to travel of couse to get them from ilford lane. Jazakallah sheikh uthman. Assalamualaikum from malaysia.

[@aunthegeek5788]

He has a way with words.. the only point of unity of him is everyone uniting on the Salafi aqeeda.

[@MAli99923]

And what's wrong with that?

[@SalafLB]

Which is the only correct aqeedah.

[@jacksparow25]

​@@SalafLBsaved sect syndrome

[@SalafLB]

@@jacksparow25 *saved sect

@@jacksparow25tell me what you follow 😁

[@Zahra-ri2pl]

When I get angry wanna slap in the face but control my self seek refuge from evil my self and satan.the minute I said the angry will go away..alhamdulilah the deen taught me a lot allahu akbar thank to allah swt.who send us our beloved prophet muhammad peace be upon.we love him more than our lives.because he sacrified his life for us.

[@omarmarwat1408]

I’ve tried a couple of times to have Husn e zan about the Sheikh but he has acted as a Hizbi esp in Daneil’s case. He had a podcast with Mufti Tariq Masood n showed him great respect only to backbite the next time he was asked bout this session by Dawah man in an all inclusive Salafi gathering

[@inamurrahmansir9471]

22:10 Yes this is India. On the packets of Cigarettes , Tobacco , Pan Masala etc its clearly written that it causes mouth cancer and horryfing image mouth cancer. I asked those who consume these stuff. They answered When they started consuming it at that time it was not mentioned and they got addicted, and Police here charges fine from tobacco Sellers but they don't say a single word to the cigarette tobacco companies. May Allah guide those people.

[@azeemk9253]

Has the issue of him and Karim Abu Zaid attempting to publicly humiliate Daniel H been brought up as well as him showing his 2 faced true colours on that embarrassing podcast with Dawah Man as well as his many Arabic mistakes including from the Quran which was exposed by the brothers in Bradford been brought up as well?

[@shafieakhan1781]

Shaykh yasir al Hanafi invited him to sit with him after he welcomed any deobandi and he his away

[@Xenor999]

Was that public humiliation?.isnt that exaggerated language.i don't know the whole issue so I can't say

[@Abdul_Ahad_Urban_Revert]

Sheikh Uthman probably gets the most Shahadas than most Daees combined, he has 99 more good things than bad, rather than backbiting him and trying to make him look bad to non Muslims, you can try do to at least 1% of what he does for Islam and the Muslims, try to excuse his mistakes, may Allah guide us all.

[@DeeTofa]

Daniel H is the one who wanted to publicly speak with Sheikh Uthman

[@Abdul_Ahad_Urban_Revert]

@@khairt1731 Evidence is clear on his channel, there are real scholars who might not be perfect at reciting Qur'an, plus if you struggle reading the Qur'an you get two rewards, any more crap?

[@yassinhassan336]

1:25:31 The host here is confusing the means with the reason. Ibn Uthaymeen used to say that the rulers reflect the condition of a society and he quoted the ayah 6:129, the rulers are not the cause themselves. Allah says in the Qur'an that He doesn't change the condition of a people unless they change what's in themselves. At Tabari mentions in his tafsir of this ayah is that If a people leave the obedience of Allah, He will remove their blessings. Numerous ayahs and ahadith show that if we want sustenance from Allah, if we want to be honored as an ummah, then we have to be steadfast and go back to Allah, make the Hereafter our focus, this is how we rectify our affairs. If we run after the dunya, Allah will humiliate us, this is what we're doing and thus humiliation is our current state.

[@AbuZee1]

Very interesting podcast and fair play to you brother Dilly, you pushed back and questioned alot of the so called "salafi" ideology but i feel the brother was alot more PC than he is on his own platforms. With all due respect i have heard many of his talks and he is very divisive in his opinions on the aqidah of millions of muslims around the world, whos aqidah actually makes up the majority of the ummah today. Denial that the majority of the ummah have been upon Ashari wa Maturidi creed is quite worrying. We know the classical Atharis wa hanaabila held theological views generally inline with the mainstream ahlus sunnah Ashari view. Today unfortunately i feel alot of people who claim to be upon the Athari creed and Hanbali madhab have hijacked these titles to cling on to some tradition for more credibility. The Ottomans were far from perfect but any muslim who has read one book on islamic history will know that for approx. 1000 years they were definitely not "salafi". They promoted ahlus sunnah Ashari wa Maturidi creed, they promoted tasawwuf wa ihsaan within turuq. Calling istigaathah shirk when 1000s of ulema have stated it's permissibility with conditions is denial of basic islamic facts. Denying Salahuddin Ayyubi was an Ashari and promoted Ashari madaaris is again pure denial of facts. Just like we have "salafi" individuals who deny imam Nawawi and ibn Hajar al Asqalaani were upon Ashari aqidah. Atleast be honest and say yes we are a minority and have always been this way, we have a new creed that popped up in the last 2 centuries and we have a handful of scholars who we can turn too. Pure and simple, all mainstream muslims adhere to Quran wa Sunnah, yet we respect and concede in knowledge to the 1000s of scholars within the madhaahib who have scrutinised and meticulously researched masaail. Are we going to go above ibn aabidin, imam nawawi et al. ?? For the layman either we follow a fortified methodology within a madhab laid down by 1000s of scholars whos uprightness has been agreed upon or we follow a few modern day scholars with minority opinions that have arisen in the last 200 years. Many muslims cannot read Qur'an with correct tajweed, how then can we open Bukhaari wa Muslim etc. and find our wudu and prayer method? Practically people follow teachers, who follow their teachers, only a mujtahid will extract rulings directly from Qur'an wa Sunnah. Only jaahil people cling to their own madhab and state the rest are wrong, the ikhtilaaf within the ummah is a mercy as we know. The brother in essence said in his closing remarks we should unite the ummah if they agree on my narrow understanding of classical theology, this sounds disingenuous to me. May Allah forgive me if my comments are out turn or if i am mistaken. الله مستعان.

[@AbuZee1]

Good point. Misplaced adab maybe.

[@fachryan7907]

You took the words out of my mouth bro, well done. The islamic methodologies are at large, are long fruitful tradition & insyallah rooted upon the haq. To be united as the guest implied, is to in line with the conundrum of modern salafi ideology, which is different from the classical hanabila, thus It felt insincere..

[@kb4432]

Just imagine if Muslims stopped following the 4 schools of thought and joined Salafism. All the knowledge gained by sincere Ulema, would be lost forever. In Salafist ideology, burning of books not in accordance with their beliefs is common. Ignorance and confusion would prevail. The hadith mentioning knowledge being taken away is close.

[@alH1ndawi]

​@@kb4432If you had intellect you would know that there is no difference between Salafi and the 4 I'mmah of Ahl al-Sunnah who were Salafi. The issue is, when the false claimants of these madhhaibs use the madhhaibs as a means to spread their innovated and filthy creeds such as the Ash'ari, Maturidi and other Mutakallim filth.

[@dcanebreezy5784]

LOL ? Aren't 4 imams on Salaf Athar aqeeda & fiqh? What knowledge ? greek philosophy & shirk ? Why would someone follow Aqeeda of people who came after centuries & leave Three first generations ? Isn't innovations what devided the Ummah ? @@kb4432

[@conjugatemethod]

The greatest cause of disunity amongst "Sunnis" broadly conceived is the Wahhabi doctrine of tripartite tawhid and their new-fangled conception of bid'ah.

[@dcanebreezy5784]

There is nothing called Wahhabi Allah is The Wahhab. Muhammed ibn Abd Al Wahhab didn't bring anything new. If doing tawaf around graves & call to dead people is islam for you, i'd like to inform you this is not our religion (according to Quran & Sunnah) Period! Wahhabi doctrine ? can u teach me please about it ? Oh, you mean we need to follow the philosophy doctrine right ? of people who came 4 centuries after The prophet Sorry! Their new conception of Bidah ? have u read about Sahaba & 3 first generations, 4 imams & bukhari ..etc If u want to make a religion of your whimes & desires don't call urself Muslim. You seem to not learn from previous nations lol

[@RevelationvsDesires]

This was one of your most interesting podcasts… you pressed him gently enough to see his ideological positions…unfortunately the salafiyyah don’t understand it’s their worldview that is a cause of disunity both historically and contemporary…Ahlul Sunnah wal Jamma’A is united upon 4 schools of thought, 3 creeds and Tassawuf.

[@bnamallan6082]

Hatu burhanakum in kuntum sadiqiyn...it's very obvious u re just repeating what you heard from ur ulema's...u can't just make a claim without substanciating it and assume you are correct.

[@bnamallan6082]

And u didn't know that there was a division even within the fiqh madhhabs because they lied to you that it was always rosy...Only follow the Qur'an and Sunnah of the prophet and respect all the salaf and great ulema and don't become a hardline muqallid to any teacher or School...U should only be blind follower to the teaching of prophet Muhammad SALLAH AALLAAH ALIHI WASALLAM

[@Mohammed-bz8lt]

@bnamallan6082 "they lied to you" What an arrogant statement that sums up the salafiyyah mindset. Everything is black and white in their mind. The scholars are out their lying to people, except theirs ofcourse. Greatest disunity has come from salafiiyah within sunni Muslims, if you were around in the early 2000s you would have known what fitna they caused going around calling Muslims mushrik and attacking the madhabs. Mr genuis if you think you in your ignorant jahil state can claim to be someone capable of ijtihad and derive your own rulings and weigh different opinions by your own judgement, then go ahead. That's what salafiyah calls for, it calls for the ignorant laymen to delve in fiqh and aqeedah debates without even having basic rules of tajweed under their belt. Yet they can still delve into source texts and weigh up evidences. Someone once described salafiyyah as islamic protestantism, and that's every true, its roots are quite modern, similar to how protestantism allowed eventually Liberal Christianity and modern secularism to form through "personal readings". We're now seeing this with modernism in islam. The early salafiyah attack on scholars going as far as to attack the 1000 year traditions entire legitimacy (something Shaykh uthman is ignorant of or glossed over). People calling abu hanifah a deviant, people who follow madhab deviant, despite this being the norm for the vast majority of the ummah. Now we see modernists using same line of arguments to reject scholarship for personal readings, going as far as rejecting the very fundamental principles regarding how to interpret scripture. Their rejection and personal readings are a logical conclusion oslf simplistic salafi puritanism Of course within the classical tradition there is differences, and it's not all unified no one ever claims that. The reality of life is its messy and not perfect, pointing that out is not a blemish. No one is saying things are always "rosy". But they certainly didn't declare most of the ummah as mushriks involved in idol worship. The way a certain somebody did.

[@Mohammed-bz8lt]

Exactly, their notion of what is shirk and what isn't exemplifies their simplistic yet internally contradictory views. Mohamed ibn abdul wahab declared the ottomans and most Muslims at the time as people commiting shirk. To him they were disbelievers and therefore there blood was halal in jihad. The reason this comes about is due to their simplistic understanding of shrik. You see, they remove beleif entirely from the equation. So if someone is going around a grave, yeah it's wrong and haram, but that doesn't make the person a mushrik but to them it does. Because ahlus sunnah would say, we need to know what the person believed before we can say they are associating partners with Allah. Whereas salafiyah consider from the action alone a person to be a disbeleievr. This obviously raises a contradiction. Let me explain, for example, if someone did sujood to a grave, and a salafi says they're a mushrik for doing shirk. The difference is that sunnis will not say its literal shirk, they will say its a apparent act of shirk and haram, but that doesn't mean the person has commited shirk because first we would need to investigate his beleif and learn if he actually believed in associating partners with Allah. The difference is, salafiyah will consider the act in and of itself shirk without caring about what the person believes. This is what lead mohamed ibn abdul wahab to declare his opponents idol worshippers. The logical contradiction is this; if sujood in and of itself is shirk, then why did Allah command the angels to prostrate to Adam? Why did Yusuf (pbuh( see a dream with moon stars etc prostrating to him? Why did his brothers prostrate to him? You may try and contextualise each incident however it contradicts the salafi/wahabi manhaj which considers acts in of themselves to be shirk without beleif, how can a act now be considered shirk (associatingpartners with Allah yet not before). However in the above incidents, clearly context and beleif matter and for sunni there's no issue since we say that beleif is what defines whether someone is doing shrik or not. This is just one example of salafi modernism and how it's new view of things like shirk caused huge amount of disunity and blood shed. If you dont believe me considerlearning about shaykh Hatim al Awnis's work on the topic and even its responses; they highlight how salafiyah from within is confused on this topic and are finally starting to realize the implications of the simplistic puritanical views they inherited. There's a reason why US think tanks want to use infighting between Muslims to push forward their own version of liberal islam. They understand that salafiyah rhetoric is very divisive (calling Muslims shirky) is not a basis on which people can simply get along. It means Muslims have internal issues aswell as outside ones. Sadly not too different to how the ottomans had to deal with a greed colonising Europe trying to encroach on muslim land, and internal wahabi rebellious attacks in Iraq and hijaz

[@RevelationvsDesires]

@@Mohammed-bz8lt you are right, this is what happens when your ego makes you believe you are a Alim when you are not even a beginner level student of knowledge… Mohammed Ibn Abdul Wahab was not a respected scholar of his time nor did he have any sanad to the 3 blessed generations… any one who claims to follow Quran and Sunnah without scholarly interpretation is misguided… 1million Hadith in 500 books of Hadith, 7 styles of reciting Quran, Reasons of Revelation, knowledge of Abrogation, knowledge of application and understanding of context… only an arrogant misguided jahil would claim to encompass all of this knowledge more correctly than the people who not only lived closer to the source of knowledge Muhammad alayhi salatul salaam but also were the product of his salatul salaam blessed dua, 11AH to 241AH (first three generations)…

[@Abdullah12794]

May Allah bless and protect Sheikh Uthman and our great brother Dilly Ameen!

[@alfihrist]

Unfortunately, he is not Hanbali. He looks at the adillah, meaning he is deeming himself knowledgeable enough to do tarjeeh of the scholars' positions.

[@Prayformetobeagoodmuslim]

Yeah because he’s not a BLIND follower like his family who were hanafi were when they weren’t even following the Fiqh of the ahnaaf…you dummies don’t respect knowledge you respect sheep smh

[@husnainshahzad2165]

the level of arrogance is extreme on someone who lacks basic nahw lol

[@muhammadakib-yp3cy]

You need to grow up

[@maazmustafa2322]

Aren't u allowed to do so after u reach a certain level of understanding of fiqh? The idea is to always go back to Allah and his messenger ﷺ if there is confusion on something

[@YamenBasira]

@@maazmustafa2322 In principle, a student can study the adillah of the madhhab. They can understand them or fail to understand them. They may personally be swayed to one position over another WITHIN the madhhab. However, a student of knowledge needs to reach a higher level within the madhhab to actually say which of the two positions is preferable from within the madhhab's principles. This is the level of being a murajjih in one's school. Are there ulema' like this today? yes. But I do not believe Brother Uthman is at that level. He is doing some good da'wah work alhamdulillah. One cannot simply do tarjeeh willy-nilly on the basis of their personal opinion. They need to be schooled in the principles of the madhhab so that their understanding represents a madhhab understanding and not an individualistic understanding. And Allah knows best. I hope I represented the idea well. May Allah bless everyone on this thread, Salafi or otherwise

[@HussainFahmy]

*_Masha'Allah, a brilliant quest._*