വൈക്കം പോരാട്ടം : മിത്തും യാഥാർത്ഥ്യവും | Sunny M Kapicadu

[@ananthapadmanabhan6340]

സണ്ണി മാഷ് ❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥 ചങ്കാണ് ഈ മനുഷ്യൻ.. എന്നെ മാറ്റി ചിന്തിക്കാൻ പ്രേരിപ്പിച്ച സംവരണത്തെ പറ്റി തെറ്റിദ്ധാരണ മാറ്റിയ വ്യക്തി 💙💙💙

[@abdulrasaq7026]

Aaaa

[@simonkk8196]

Great

[@sureshas4184]

👏👏👋👌

[@agijohn7938]

very good Sunny thanks

[@pavithrankunnil3174]

Good

[@czhe1977]

Nice 🎉

[@sreerajpc39]

👍 great❤

[@VasanthKumar-ny3zo]

Sunny sir....

[@madhunarayanan7224]

❤❤

[@pratheeshlp6185]

Sunny sir 💖💖💖

[@basheerbachi6146]

Yt?

[@pratheeshlp6185]

👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

[@pratheeshlp6185]

👍👍👍👍👍👍💗💗💗💗💗💗

[@prajithpt9677]

👍

[@rajeshshaji7666]

Sunny is always jealous against Sreenarayana Gurudevan He usually irrevence to gurudeva spiritual groy

[@sreeramank.n9999]

This fellow do not know anything about tamil brahmins contributions. Who is M.S.Swaminathan who pioneered karshika viplavam and increased agricultural productivity ? He is from alleppey. Even now he is associated with kuttanad development.

[@vrvijayaraghavan2213]

This fellow is telling so many things with a bias. One example, Gandhiji was travelling in third class and not in second class as he says. Gandhiji was not master brain behind Vaikkam sathyagraham .If Gandhiji opposed physical conflict, it was because he knew that it will be the poor lower class people who will suffer most given the social structure and power at that time..Asking other religion people from the Sathyagraha is good tactical move to avoid the criticism of other religions interfering in Hindu affairs

[@marthoma6th814]

Ezahavas become successful only after British invasion and works by missionaries. Why ignore that fact. Even if they become relatively powerful it happened only in last 200 years.

[@marthoma6th814]

@@shr1293 താങ്കൾ ഇതു ഒരു പുച്ഛം പോലെ പറയുന്നത് എന്തിന് എന്ന് മനസ്സിൽ അകുനില...i don't think anybody should feel bad about being ezahava if that was the case. They were a hardworking group of people unlike freeloading Brahmins. The problem is that it is more likely that the Syrian Christian caste formed originally as Christian/Jewish traders സംഗരം, and later by marriage bonding with Shudra women and Christian traders. Since there were no Kshatriyas and since ezahavas were not shudras (they were untouchable outcaste ,chandalas), this is the most likely scenerio. Although, I agree that this could easily happen at an earlier period before brahminization, when caste divisions were not very strong. Also, In the case of Ezahavas, large numbers become Latin catholic at the time of Portuguese. Check ചെപ്പെടുകൾ and also works by vinil paul, etc. were ezahavas were given to Syrian Christians as slaves and service castes. Check also video by മാളവിക ബിന്നി on കൂനൻ കുരിശ് സത്യം were she quotes Pious Malekandathil and Susan Viswanathan s works on the topic.

[@sukumaranpsukumaranp5696]

👍👍

[@sujithsukumaran6309]

👍🏼

[@sajeevantr31]

❤❤❤❤❤❤