VANILLA hard surface modeling tutorial for Blender

[@gustavogodeny]

Great video, thank you Josh! Look, the issue you faced with mirror modifier about 15:00 I think is because you had to delete the half you didn't want, otherwise the mesh overlaps both sides. Anyway the Bisect option solves that too!

[@Kleingedrucktes]

This one should go into the video!

[@juozaszutautas6757]

The introduction was very helpful, thanks!

[@XenoforgeCG]

Nice, this really gives me motivation to do more vanilla hard surface modeling videos!

[@precis3drndmanufacturing347]

bro thanks so much, you actually made soft soft easy to understand

[@BeheadedKamikaze]

Thanks Josh, this video is packed with great info!

[@MarkIn4D]

7:56 I think you might have made a mistake there by mixing up the auto boolean with the brush boolean.

[@tim_arterbury]

Amazing!! Thank you!

[@Bingbangbong28]

The best!!! Thank you :)

[@cephalos81]

very nice technique but what if i don't have a single micron to spare on a mechanical part for CNC :)?

[@Kleingedrucktes]

Nice Video again!

[@a_art_man]

Done. Cool.

[@Instant_Nerf]

Do you do any architectural design tutorials? -Houses..

[@tomasla9345]

thanks for sharing, great tutorial, i just finished the hard surface intro tutorial (the robot arm) im looking what to do next, just have to ask.. coming from another software where quads modeling is very strict, what the deal with the all those *ngons* .. for hard surface doent matter? will my uvs unfold as easy?

[@sebastianosewolf2367]

do you know, why from time to time, when you use undo a few times, that cavity got deactivated ?

[@garrylongiii9785]

That fucking face steal helped me heaps, wish I knew about it 165 models ago. Lol

[@DataJuggler]

Your bevels look curvy, where mine seem to just keep a flat edge.

[@gustavogodeny]

Use the scroll button of the mouse, that should work

[@DataJuggler]

@@gustavogodeny That did work. I was trying to move the mouse I think.

[@colelivingstone3856]

First😂😂

[@Perchpole]

F me. One day you guys will actually create something that isn't a box with booleans knocked out of it!

[@Ironpants57]

Topology would have to be ironed out if you want to transfer the object from software to software. Other than that, there isn't anything wrong with the workflow.