The Largest Holders of Nuclear Warheads in the World

The Largest Holders of Nuclear Warheads in the World.
SIPRI, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, The Arms Control Association.

[@vanessacallahan3515]

If you pay attention not only US and Russia back and forth in an arms race, Pakistan and India are in one as well, just on a smaller scale.

[@Foreverspiralling]

Yeh no sh1t, Sherlock

[@m-11]

Should have shown two being subtracted from United States in 1945

[@irenafarm]

I don’t think they counted those, since the nuclear arms race officially begins after they were deployed.

[@DyNamiC_PulsE]

Well those were atomic bombs not nuclear warheads

[@davidblack4555]

3, there's the trinity test on July 16.

[@antiares1684]

Thermonuclear weapons are the only thing which prevents full scale WWIII. Nuclear deterence is a real thing that works, lets hope that it countinues to work as intended.

[@CyberneticEmperoroftheWorld]

Советский союз, это мощь !!!

[@user-oy7pf2he7s]

Русский союз русская федерация русские

[@armandoassante9168]

Его нет ! Его убили русские . Русским вообще нельзя доверять власть . Горбачев развалил страну . Ельцин пропил и продал страну. Путин добивает и распродаёт то что осталось от них . А народу дал ложный патриотизм того , чего уже давно нет . Живут прошлым и думают о прошлом .

[@terrywert6587]

Good use of background music here. Definately reflects the danger of the situation!

[@haroldmerewether1224]

America went full steam ahead with their nuke production after the war.

[@vindicator05]

Quantity comparison with nuke overkills is like two guys counting their matches with one having 2 and the other one having 5 on the hand - and a bathub full of petrol between them.

[@irenafarm]

I remember the height of the Arms Race and the end of it. The Arms Race was TERRIFYING. We’re still feeling the effects today. I don’t think people realize how deeply that conflict scarred the world. I genuinely cannot stand Reagan. However, his decision to up the ante with space-based defense was absolutely the hole in the dike of the Iron Wall. With that shift, we only need about 25% of our full arsenal to glass every Russian urban center and defense sector. And it can happen before 50% of anything Russia launches, gets here. That would be absolutely awful. But as Sting sang, “There’s no such thing as a winnable war. It’s a lie we don’t believe any more… Believe me when I say to you, I hope the Russians love their children, too.”

[@anthonyvono2878]

Man will eventually destroy himself and his world. Do they really need all those nuclear weapons? It's disgusting.

[@jetster785]

Or Artificial intelligence could be a threat! Indeed tens of thousands nukes is nonsense and utter stupidity particularly from the US and Russia!

[@Be3nz]

I views politics and the politics of war , propaganda in politics, as something very immature.and Lacking in any Honor

[@rudragaming6977]

Absolutely we need. Because of nuclear weapons WW3 is not happening

[@suman9299]

@@rudragaming6977I agree or we destroy ourself in many ways, many differences…

[@FelixX138]

Ядерное оружие является очень хорошим аргументом сдерживания. К слову та же Северная Корея сейчас себя чувствует намного лучше как раз за счёт Ядерного оружия и поддержки России. Поверь мне без этого оружия Пхеньян себя чувствовал намного сложнее особенно когда часто проводились военные учения между Америкой и Южной Кореей тогда часто самолёты этих стран практически заходили на территорию Северной Кореи и пытались спровоцировать на ответ и это могло сработать во первых радары явно не могли точно показать в нужное время что самолёты не долетели и развернулись, а во вторых Пхеньян вот он, до него рукой подать, а там сотни самых важных людей страны находится. Думаю объяснять что Южная Корея перестала подобным заниматься из-за появления Ядерного оружия у Северной Кореи, думаю не стоит, сам поймёшь 😊

[@DKS_London]

Something wrong here, India conducted it's first nuclear test in 1974, so surely it had the nuclear weapon.

[@naumankhan6053]

India and Pakistan had the ability to produce nuclear weapons in the 60's. It was not until late 90's that they engaged in a nuclear arms race. Both countries had operational nuclear reactors running in 60's.

[@jont2576]

It's funny how we invented the means to wipe out the entire earth even before we solved anything

[@andyz3925]

These are precise, accurate numbers to the penny.

[@user-kz1vg9ry2b]

But, doesn't the present us have enough men,real men to fight a long bloody war ? I don't think so, and men win wars.any doubt, sissies?😂😂btw, Ukraine is fighting a proxy war for the US now, and that's how it's gonna become,that's until others get it,and that is, the US doesn't have real men anymore!!Men without balls don't win wars!!😂😂

[@cye58]

That's just straight scary ! 👁️

[@alltimeartcraft2441]

Which software do you use for making this racing bar? Please Reply...

[@Sacacasmeajudem]

O video original pertence ao canal "La vida en lo gráfico"

[@valetudo7363]

Honestly, how would anyone really know these numbers. It’s not like this is advertised public information. 🤔

[@andyz3925]

Exactly. Look how accurate U.S. intelligence was for Iraq. My thoughts are no nation will ever know exactly how many nukes other countries may have no matter how high tech their intelligence may be... .. not even a ball park figure.

[@thelocallocksmithcompany-t9164]

I was thinking the same thing. You have no idea how many nukes anyone else has. Crazy to think you know these details by year.

[@Lucas-lz1mt]

​@@thelocallocksmithcompany-t9164 são estimativas com base em análises de documentos. Todos sabíamos a e os Estados Unidos estava mentindo sobre o Iraque, como em quase todas suas guerras.

[@cordeg]

In 1960, the Kennedy campaign tried to claim that Eisenhower had allowed the USSR to leap frog the US nuke deployment and open a "missile gap" but we had a 10:1 advantage at the time. By the time JFK/LBJ were out it was 3:1. By the time Reagan cancelled "detante", they had actually leapfrogged us. Politics is funny that way.

[@mattllaves]

I imagine it would have been extremely difficult to tell how many nukes the Soviets had at the time

[@cordeg]

@@mattllaves numbers in those days were based mostly on human intelligence and on the amount of industrial activity in areas where we knew nuclear development was being done via U2 flyovers and the like. You are right that this would be a gross estimate at best.

[@larsdahlen319]

​​​@@mattllavesImage the world where a man with a stone axe could rule . Because he could if no one else had nothing.

[@user-zp7wc5nl2p]

Мы всегда были впереди вас 😂

[@Filtox-Lenur]

@@user-zp7wc5nl2pпо яйцам? Или по окорочкам? А может по выпуску автомобилей? Не смеши людей…

[@noidnobb]

Quantity is never an issue, the issue is who dares to use it. and whether they can bear the consequences.😀

[@sunnyboner676]

Maybe you’ve forgotten? Americans have used them twice on a civilian population in Nagasaki and Hiroshima.

[@leochan6682]

Yes, but back at that time no one but America had it. Today, everyone have it.

[@cikorasikorskiy1486]

США уже применяли ядерное оружие против Японии. Не стесняясь. Миллионы жертв от двух маленьких бомб.

[@dewaynesmith1718]

I agree. Depends who's devilish enough to push the big red button

[@robertjensen1048]

@@sunnyboner676Maybe you’ve forgotten that civilians were fair game during WW2, if it achieved a larger strategic picture.

[@PacificMonk]

From the time a baby boomer was born to the time they were teenagers, the world had gone from 0 to some 30,000 nuclear weapons.

[@Happy-wb8gi]

What is not mentioned is that Italy at Aviano NATO Air base has alot, all belonging to the dmUSA which they can use when ever they want and the Italian government has no power over it.

[@flyingpharoah4867]

Same for when Ukraine "had" them

[@Joker-no1uh]

Maybe because they belong to the US? Just a guess

[@Happy-wb8gi]

@@Joker-no1uh yep, but also because Italy since the 2nd WW has been ruled by the Mafia and USA tbh. In Italy every one knows this, our government is corruption and tge USA dictate to them. Sad, but true!

[@FhillipFry]

Italians don't do war good

[@alastairbarkley6572]

Are you a American? If the Italian government becomes uncomfortable with Aviano nukes it can order them removed by the US. And, if the US is slow to take them away the Italians can seize them and forcibly return them to America. What's the benefit to.Italy to keep nukes there?

[@Mr_harshit18]

Plz make vedio on total internet users by countries

[@rubenbaraxa]

Its the same as population , for last 10 yeras at least.

[@martinb.770]

"No mouse would develop the idea to build a mouse trap!"

[@Benzijune]

What a shame for humanity 😢

[@sokratisperatinos4658]

All the world is a madhouse. They are all nuts.

[@user-zu6qn9ux9n]

Mostly politicians

[@armandoassante9168]

- Я не знаю какой будет 3-я мировая война , но четвёртая точно будет на палках ! Эйнштейн.

[@81munir]

Aren't they scared if it all blew up in their own countries? Crazy.

[@CrazyPanda.000]

Use need ro mix two materials to make nuclear reaction, both are kept separately

[@fgk765jkh]

​@CrazyPanda.000 excuse me? 😂 not anywhere closeto how a nuclear bomb works.

[@ammiraglio50]

Honestly .... This Is Only what they want that we know.

[@Lovecbabochek]

These are strategic nuclear weapons. Russia also has 20,000+ such charges. These are special 152mm, 230mm shells.

[@dvaplustwo]

Kazakhstan, Ukraine and Belarus have never had nuclear weapons. These were the heads of the USSR, located in various parts of its territory, including the territory of the USSR, the BSSR and others. To say the opposite is the same as saying that the US nuclear heads located in Belgium, Italy and Turkey are the nuclear weapons of these countries

[@marshalljarnagin9370]

Ukraine held control of the nukes. When the USSR collapsed, so did their control. Ukraine didn't want them, and eventually signed a deal to give them back. But they weren't under Russian control.

[@Dryadenjoyer]

After the collapse of the soviets, the weapons still remained on their territory. The main command post no longer existed. The fact that these countries surrendered their nuclear arsenals is a result of the Lisbon Protocol. This was a collective decision and a joint agreement, not the desire of one of the parties. So technically they had nuclear weapons and, more likely, if they had not accepted this protocol, they would have remained nuclear powers.

[@dvaplustwo]

No, it was a Soviet nuclear weapon controlled from Moscow. And Ukraine, Kazakhstan, and Belarus could not launch it in 1992 - only from Moscow. Just like Belgium today cannot launch American nuclear weapons located on its territory

[@NazriB]

Lies again? Dallas Bull S**t USD SGD

[@Dryadenjoyer]

@@dvaplustwo , soviets don’t exist from December 26, 1991. Something that doesn’t exist cannot posses or control anything.

[@edmiy8395]

O Japão e Coreia do Sul possuía matéria prima pra construir as ogivas, está na hora de cada um ter 300 ogivas-dissuasão

[@TheGreatCatsby-pd2tt]

I agree that Cuba will have 500 warheads.

[@Constantin57]

Nicaragua? Why not?

[@FhillipFry]

They have to speak with their boss first

[@user-ze2dp8ml9u]

Ахаха ты сначало на карту мира посмотри и попробуй найти на ней свою японию и мелкобританию им вообще нет смысла что то иметь🚀💥🇯🇵🏳️‍🌈🇬🇧💥🤣🤣

[@muhammedjaseemshajeef6781]

Japan is puppet of usa😢​@@FhillipFry

[@RubenDeanda-lb9wr]

60 thousands heads at the pinacle what a madness

[@namasi7070]

So we now know who started the nuclear arms race.

[@MrJord1994]

It was never not known

[@dormantviewer]

Gog and magog..

[@mj48187]

Suggestion: Minerals

[@nikolaimariaromanov8384]

I was of the understanding it only takes one!

[@user-hr5el6pj2f]

На другом канале совсем другие данные были в графике 🤷‍♂️

[@PrimumGenus]

Late 70s must totally be Soviet Union golden era

[@QQru3nik]

Конец 70х стал причиной распада СССР

[@IgorSmirnoff-qr3xd]

@@QQru3nikНезнайка на Луне

[@IgorSmirnovSpb]

Ничего удивительного. На Западе энергетический кризис и психологическая травма от поражения во Вьетнаме. В СССР благоприятные цены на нефть и то, что было заложено Сталиным в экономике и образовании дало свои плоды.

[@benjamingrant3441]

На самом деле 60е, если мы берем все показатели, включая качество жизни.

[@vipeerx]

Ну основная масса наших родителей и родственников считают, что 70е были лучшим временем в СССР

[@ngacni]

The numbers are down, the power went up

[@muawiyashaikh2229]

Japan also had 2💀💀💀

[@allydr90]

VERY active nuclear warheads

[@user-zu6qn9ux9n]

Had

[@shahid8545]

One thing is for sure. They didn't build and research this tech to have them sitting around. They will be used a some point.

[@Rayxxx19741]

they are built for deterence. do you know the means of deterence?😂😂😂😂😂At this point its better that any country can have but it surely doesn t mean conventional wars cannot exist anymore.

[@shahid8545]

@@Rayxxx19741 You don't think these will not be used? Don't be so gullible. They have already been used and they will be used again.

[@Rayxxx19741]

@@shahid8545 fuck if nukes are used as you think even cities would have their own arsenal. Does the world Deterrence means nothing to you? Probably not.

[@shahid8545]

@@Rayxxx19741 Nuclear have already been used pinhead. Remember Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

[@nandotorres4461]

¿Irán what are you waiting for?

[@syedrafi2258]

No one can stop them if they will dare to make it

[@whatif4942]

Where are a the obsolete ones?

[@nicksheppard8107]

So all the ol ones went on ebay?

[@fajarcahyono3693]

First Music : The Great War Second Music : The Eternal War

[@aqeel-3771]

Fun fact- couple of ussr nukes are missing after ussr fell.

[@Manu10900]

And a couple of US nukes were lost in the ocean and were never found...

[@user-qm1zx1kk6v]

Если сшп на своей территории ВСЕ свои заряды взорвёт, то этого достаточно, чтобы человек прекратил существование

[@surrocclusion442]

Nuclear bombs have devastating effects, but it becomes necessary to have them if your enemy has them.

[@varoonnone7159]

Zulfikar Ali Bhutto said that Pakistan will have nuclear weapons even if it meant Pakistanis had to later eat grass Thanks to China, Pakistan has nuclear weapons and Pakistanis are eating grass

[@Judah_889]

Actually it's USA who helped pakistan to get nukes as Pakistan was the biggest non nato ally of USA in cold war to counter india

[@factsofrealsandreels1911]

India like always scored second position in world hunger index South Asia now tell who is eating grass

[@cobra28373]

​@@factsofrealsandreels1911but I'm not hungry😮

[@syedrafi2258]

India has more hunger index than Pakistan but urine drinker have audacity to say Pakistan poor

[@syedrafi2258]

​@@cobra28373wtf! You are not hungry it means others are also not hungry,what a cringe indian mindset😂😂😂

[@rimatanluhur6064]

who did say that

[@user-ss1pn5hd4g]

Lest we forget, USA would not have had these weapons without the European scientists. Even Oppenheimer studied at Cavendish at Cambridge which has always been the foremost physics school since scientific revolution almost. Oppenheimer was academically excellent but his lab skills were an abonimation according to eminent Physicists Rutherford et al

[@LiveAlohaOhana]

Thats scary

[@dugarburyadad]

В 45 году у США должно было уменьшиться количество на 2.

[@saisirvous7363]

China in 2020 have 270 Then in 2022 have 410😂

[@sunnyboner676]

Have you not seen the Us reports on how China is rapidly increasing its nuclear arsenal and building silos to house them?

[@PrinceofPeace2000]

It doesn't matter who's wrong or right, we're all ded! D-E-D...ded!

[@ralfnaval2780]

Philippines should have its nuclear capability around the year 1970s.. if it wasn't for that revolution which promises progress, freedom which turns out to be the opposite.. so sad..

[@damirsirotic052]

How many times should it be reminded that Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Belarus have never possessed (were the owners of) a single nuclear warhead. They were deployed on their territory, but these weapons were commanded, guarded, and maintained by the joint forces of the CIS.

[@user-po2qb6cm9q]

Not one of them will ever be fired in anger either. The world starves to death while it slowly heats up and what was the bill in taxes for these WMD?

[@johnclayton4166]

Imagine what all the money spent by our government on military could do to improve everyones lives , instead of being hellbent on destroying everything

[@jamiecook8239]

With out a military, enemy states can just walk in an ruin your peaceful life.

[@raulroopchand3492]

Imagine if people got off their fat lazy backsides and worked to improve their own lives instead of expecting the government to do everything for them.

[@jamiecook8239]

No military= Putin and Xi Ping will be your leader

[@alastairbarkley6572]

Sorry, EVERYONE in the world is lazy and has a fat arse? What are you talking about? I worked.very hard all my life and now I have a comfortable, well-deserved retirement, I think how much better health and how much more years of healthy life I might have if literally thousands of trillions hadn't been spent on nuclear weapons. Does that explain it?

[@raven-wf9so]

It might be better to imagine that your sat in your garden ,and your neighbour wants to expand his fence with a bulldozer , good luck persuading him to stop with your unicorn 🦄

[@henrywang3977]

China is not exactly transparent on the stock number of nuclear arsenal yet. All the available numbers are guesses.

[@sksksks5072]

So what is the numbers u think ?

[@henrywang3977]

@@sksksks5072 Hardly known. But I guess it wouldn't be less than 1000 since 2018.

[@hydrogenivtinyhare5218]

@@henrywang3977What’s your guess based on?

[@henrywang3977]

@@hydrogenivtinyhare5218 The launching vehicle has shown on 2019 parade all added together could have more than 400 nuclear warhead launching capability. Warheads are actually cheaper than the rockets and the vehicles, so there should be slightly more missiles than the launchers. They can't bring all the launchers for a parade, there must be more of them staying in position. That I think it is a safe guess to double that number to be the minimum of the total number.

[@hydrogenivtinyhare5218]

@@henrywang3977 I checked your estimation, you’re about there. There were 16x DF-17, 32x DF-100, 16x DF-26, 12x JL-2, 16x DF-31, 4x DF-5B, 16x DF-41. In which DF-17 and DF-100 are not nuclear compatible, DF-26, JL-2, and DF-31 can carry 3 small warheads, DF-5B can carry 1 big warhead, and DF-41 can carry 10 small warheads. Assume they were all loaded with nuclear warheads, the total was 296 nukes.

[@ObiwanKenobitomat212]

Without Indonesia, it's impossible for US to produce nuclear warhead so drastically. They exploited all nuclear materials from Freeport Hills.

[@Paulista2309]

Brazil?

[@captainamerica5826]

Oppenheimer you smarty pants

[@jakeeasterwood3204]

How many times over to destroy the planet is really necessary?

[@philipdennis-rh7uj]

Biggest diffrence? Our stuff works

[@Lucas-lz1mt]

Ukraine shows that no material is what governments say it is

[@user-yg3nx9en2f]

Нет тут никакой разницы, дружок, это все очень нехорошо.

[@adrianmedina2629]

U dckhd

[@manpreetbrar838]

The united states need to start sharing out some of that loove❤

[@user-kg1og9qq1c]

With?

[@kennethwilder4253]

I wonder how many of these are tactical nukes, compared to ICBM nukes?

[@sergioeaeapp]

No es algo de lo que sentir mucho orgullo.

[@ozgebateman7343]

Disgrace why 🥺

[@sharetherisk7647]

Way to be there Canada...oh snap, they didn't even make the list

[@djzoodude]

The two at the top have the power to wipe out the human species, a couple times over. So that's fun.

[@arfanhaziq3075]

So Iran has no nuke.. But US is very worried 😂

[@pq_az]

Iran DOES have nuclear scientists... according to these moments😉😉

[@arfanhaziq3075]

@@pq_az Almost every country in the world have nuclear scientist.. and US still worried 🤣🤣🤣

[@pq_az]

@@arfanhaziq3075 of course. Holding a nuclear weapon is not about destruction like it is about the paranoia of its holder and the threatened of those who might be its potential target.

[@molonlave2193]

They have Uranium which can be used to build nuclear weapons.

[@mikec9435]

Who tried to hold all the power first? Interesting....

[@salaheldin2667]

هل هناك تكنولوجيا لتحويل الطاقة النووية للقنابل الحربية الذرية الي طاقة يمكن التحكم فيها والاستفادة منها بدلا من استخدامها كاداة تدميرية إرهابية قاتلة لو الإجابة بالنفي لا توجد فهنا تقع المصيبة كيف نصنع شيئ كهذا ليدمر الأرض التي تجعلنا أحياء على سطحها

[@weisslight818]

MOX технология...

[@gaston_portus]

Espero que el cabezas nucleares no comience a crecer😢

[@nhanoacid]

Pues si que bajaron drásticamente con lis acuerdos que tuvieron ¿ solo mira la urss con 40 mil warheads activados ?ahora solo 4800 de actual Rusia Ya son menos los golpes 🤪

[@irenafarm]

This is a bit misleading. Active warheads don’t automatically imply ability to deploy. It also doesn’t take into account deployment technology. Most of the US deployment is focused on submarines. Most Russian nukes are geared for land-based deployment. Also, Russia’s war with Ukraine has amply demonstrated the gap between _theoretical_ war footing and actual capabilities. There’s rampant decay, corruption, lack of training, and incompetence at every level. Imo, there’s equal chances as to whether a launched warhead would 1) not actually launch 2) simply crash into the nearest urban center 3) come down on some random non-target 4) actually make it to the intended target but not activate 5) actually activate as intended. Some of the US systems are also aging but we’re aware of the issues. These mostly affect the silo-based systems that don’t figure into most response plans.

[@engineershow765]

USA 🇺🇸 Best of the Best 💪🏼💪🏼💪🏼💪🏼💪🏼😎

[@andreyiforoff8891]

😂 🏴‍☠️+🏳️‍🌈=🇺🇲

[@juancarlosromobejar3795]

Corea del Norte con muchas carencias materiales y con un paupérrimo nivel de vida de sus habitantes pero eso sí con armas nucleares.

[@Mike-vr4lw]

MAD

[@vieuxbal1253]

1945 Little Boy and Fat Man. 1961 Tsar Bomba... and the rest is history.

[@alvarocisneros1648]

Tener esas armas debería ser un delito

[@marcosl4374]

Many countries have the technology to build them today but there's an agreement of non proliferation of nuclear warheads

[@muhamadakmal4693]

How about Iran and Indonesia, why don't you have data about it

[@thomasedwardking7286]

British testing in Australia, the French in the Pacific. We won't have that in our neighbourhood, please. Peace ✌️🕊️ Au revoir

[@cryptotimes1583]

South Africa giving up it's nuclear weapons want a mistake.

[@Mertvayamyish]

Спасибо советским ученым , что в 49 году изобрели ядерное оружие!

[@enPassantWarrior9047]

can anyone explain how these nuclear warheads keep on decreasing if they were not using it

[@user-of5ft4og3s]

Американцы обманули Россию сказали что будут сокращать вместе пока Россия сокращала они свои закапывали в земли!хотя они сами России выделили деньги на постройку специальных заводов по утелизации ядерного оружия и Россия исполняла этот договор а они нет

[@q___m2158]

Google INF treaty (1987) START 1 treaty (1991) etc

[@enPassantWarrior9047]

@@q___m2158 here

[@GateKeeperXL]

The US could've conquered the world after WWII with it's nuke arsenal and while the rest of the world are still reeling from the aftermath. Yet it did not. Instead, the US helped rebuild those mostly affected by the War, like Japan. It would've been a different story if it was the Nazis who triumphed.

[@armandoassante9168]

Зато нацисты передали эстафету России.

[@69digs59]

You mean it could have conquered the whole world by nuking all the countries? Ok, yes. That's true. Why would the US want to do that? What would be the purpose of having a polluted and radioactive planet with the US as the only liveable country on the planet? Actually, I don't get your point. Please explain.

[@eduardodelatorre9439]

😂😂😂😂

[@AlexMolchanov90]

​@@armandoassante9168Глупо такое писать.

[@user-or8ur8uw4m]

Зачем США было уничтожать мир, если они были главными выигравшими в нём? Им ничего не угрожало и не угрожает сейчас.

[@GothRailfan]

USA: "Quick! Soviet Union has 1 warhead! Faster god dammit!"

[@johnmeckel2319]

They May Have The Most, But You Failed to List ALL Countries With Nuclear Weapons! Iran, India,.......

[@Shapinator721]

Iran?! Not bloody likely!

[@johnmeckel2319]

​@@Shapinator721 Keep telling yourself that! 🙄

[@tcggf2023]

Iran ?

[@Pearcewreck]

United Kingdom: FFS, 500 is enough. United States: What??!! Too much is never enough! Soviet Union: Hold my Vodka.

[@mauricedelarosa6083]

True, both the US and Russia hit some pretty scary big numbers, but I was surprised - and happy to see - that both the US and Russia reduced their stockpiles significantly over the years.

[@user-ny3ry3sy7h]

Қазақстан 1400 атом бомбасы бар ел болған 1994 жылға дейін.

[@user-ti3bm4kt8c]

которыми они не могли пользоваться чисто физически :)

[@andreyiforoff8891]

Правильно было бы сказать, что на территории Казахстана когда-то размещалось ядерное оружие, которое Казахстан не мог использовать и содержать самостоятельно. Вряд-ли эту ситуацию можно назвать обладанием ядерным оружием. Тоже самое можно сказать и об Украине. Разместить на своей территории и распоряжаться - это разные вещи.

[@allannielsen9554]

When you think about the damages in Hiroshima and Nakasaki - you wonder why these in sane numbers is nessesary. The 10000 people surviving, will all be goverments, presidents and other emperors, sitting in their underground "paradice" - waiting a couple of 100 years to get up in a burned, destroyed world. I heard the neantherthal man was extinct

[@LostHongshan]

Anyone else scratching their head over a country like Pakistan having 170? Huh?

[@welshed]

Erm, not really. Haven’t they had about four wars with India?

[@arestoaresto5299]

Where is Japan?

[@jimcampbell4738]

Off the east coast of Asia.😅

[@eddywahyudi1011]

It is sad that countries are subject to embargoes from developed countries, because of the impact of nuclear development 😢

[@user-br8xi7mq1e]

When SU made first, US had 150 already....To protect themselves.......😂😂😂😂😂

[@fajarcahyono3693]

Anyone who think human is not the most powerful species in the world and think that human not in the top of food chain is wrong. 1 Nuclear Arsenal can have 3,000 times the explosive power of Hiroshima Nuclear Bombing

[@Richnineteenseventyone]

Boggles the mind. Only a very small percentage of nukes is required to wipe out the earth ffs

[@intelligenthoodlum8935]

Ha ha…. This list is like asking a woman how many “bodies” she got….whatever she says, just double or triple that number 😂💀

[@Sandy-rv9tv]

The odd one here is Pak The number of nukes they have is far outstripped by the number of begging bowls in circulation begging for money to run their country

[@Kielermatrosen]

You should not have put Kazakhstan and Ukraine in the count. Or you should also include italy and Germany who have US warhead on their territories but do not have the clearance nor the ability to use them.

[@kolyakordai5213]

Что ты там пишешь насчёт Казахстана ?

[@user-vq7td8bd7i]

​@@kolyakordai5213ничего хорошего.

[@kolyakordai5213]

@@user-vq7td8bd7i так и понял.

[@Lovecbabochek]

​@@kolyakordai5213он всего лишь пишет что не стоило Казахстан и Украину в эту графику вставлять. Так как самостоятельно они не владели ядерным оружием. Оружие находилось на территории, но управлялось из Москвы и после развала СССР постепенно было вывезено. Намекнул на то что ядерное оружие находящееся в Германии и Италии тоже им не принадлежит, это все имущество США. Тоесть ничего хорошего и плохого комментатор не писал.

[@JCostlowMedia]

apples oranges

[@warrior6803]

Soviets were able to catch up because American had limited production

[@Shapinator721]

Nah cos America saw sense not to waste further funds on excess nukes! Thats why Russia is a poorish country today in relation.

[@user-il4ul6wn9r]

China having less no of nucler wapon. that country really like pease, but western propogada😢😢

[@rehsa-zc6zq]

I don't believe them. They are likely hiding the real number.