Video Comparison | Sony a7R II vs. a7S II - Part 2

[@ali_films]

i'v seen tons of good reviews between the two cameras, including this one, and i still can't decide which one is really better.. but i think a7sii is better in slow mo and low light. plus it doesnt over heat quickly

[@pradeepsadhwani]

B

[@sjcb]

Wow, this video has made me make my mind up. Gotta be A7S II for me. That low light capability is just phenomenal!

[@MeesTW]

Man, I wish I had enough money to buy one of these beauties.

[@AdamIverson]

At 5:43, that's not true that the camera uses 3 axis stabilization when using the manual lens. Mark 2 camera will use 5 axis stabilization regardless if the lens use OSS or not. For the lens that use OSS, the yaw and pitch will be disabled on the sensor and that yaw and pitch will be handled by the lens instead. However, if you use the lens that doesn't have OSS, the sensor will take care of yaw and pitch and it's still 5 axis stabilization. That's why it can handle it very well when you use the manual lenses.

[@TheCinegods]

Although they are both great video cameras a7sII is better for video due to low light capabilities and ability to shoot 1080p at 120fps which the A7rii only shoots 720p in 120fps. A7rii is a better camera for photography so to me non is better then the other just depends what youll be doing more of. Im looking to trade my A7rii for an A7sII since i do more videography then photography.

[@CyrosonHD]

6:51 - Wait you can only shoot 1080p in APS-C Mode on the A7Sii, is this true or was that a mistake?

[@BandH]

When you switch to movie mode or start recording a movie with [ File Format] set to [XAVC S 4K], [APS-C/Super 35mm] is locked to [Off]. If an APS-C size dedicated lens is attached, the edges of the screen may appear dark. When shooting 4K movies with this camera, we recommend using a lens compatible with the 35 mm full-frame format. bit.ly/2cDQIGB Video Format: 4K XAVC S 3840 x 2160p / 29.97 fps (100 Mbps) 3840 x 2160p / 29.97 fps (60 Mbps) 3840 x 2160p / 23.98 fps (100 Mbps) 3840 x 2160p / 23.98 fps (60 Mbps) 3840 x 2160p / 25 fps (100 Mbps) 3840 x 2160p / 25 fps (60 Mbps) High Definition XAVC S 1920 x 1080p / 120 fps (100 Mbps) 1920 x 1080p / 100 fps (100 Mbps) 1920 x 1080p / 120 fps (60 Mbps) 1920 x 1080p / 100 fps (60 Mbps) 1920 x 1080p / 59.94 fps (50 Mbps) 1920 x 1080p / 29.97 fps (50 Mbps) 1920 x 1080p / 23.98 fps (50 Mbps) 1920 x 1080p / 50 fps (50 Mbps) 1920 x 1080p / 25 fps (50 Mbps) High Definition AVCHD 1920 x 1080p / 59.94 fps (28 Mbps) 1920 x 1080i / 59.94 fps (24 Mbps) 1920 x 1080i / 59.94 fps (17 Mbps) 1920 x 1080p / 23.98 fps (24 Mbps) 1920 x 1080p / 23.98 fps (17 Mbps) 1920 x 1080p / 50 fps (28 Mbps) 1920 x 1080i / 50 fps (24 Mbps) 1920 x 1080i / 50 fps (17 Mbps) 1920 x 1080p / 25 fps (24 Mbps) 1920 x 1080p / 25 fps (17 Mbps) High Definition MP4 1920 x 1080p / 60 fps (28 Mbps) 1920 x 1080p / 29.97 fps (16 Mbps) 1280 x 720p / 29.97 fps (6 Mbps) 1920 x 1080p / 50 fps (28 Mbps) 1920 x 1080p / 25 fps (16 Mbps) 1280 x 720p / 25 fps (6 Mbps) >Mark

[@WearySisyphus]

best comparison review by far thanks a lot

[@jancam555]

How does apsc crop mode improve high iso noise performance?

[@abutomatto]

I really still cant decide. I would shoot a lot of live concerts(in the dark place). Including video. And photographs for music Magazine. And I won't shoot stars. Is a7sii good enough for still photographs???? And do a7rii handles low light which low as live house?? I think the ability of taking 4k in APSC is big for me. Which unfortunately a7sii doesn't have. I maybe couldn't afford a lot of lenses and not allowed to carry them so. Oh help me anybody.

[@geckovision]

Awesome. Very well done! I sorely wish the a7sii had the autofocus capability of the a7rii. It would be the perfect small video camera if it had that. I'm very pleased with the slog2 and slog3 options, dr, 4k, focus assist, etc... amazing camera. I like it much better than my red scarlet at this point.

[@Spawn674]

For astrophotography what would be the choice?

[@BandH]

While the Sony Alpha a7S II has a much higher ISO range and can shoot video in much lower light, if you are using the camera for still astrophotography usage needs, the Sony a7R II Mirrorless Digital Camera has better low-light performance with less image noise, and as such, would be my recommendation between these two cameras for astrophotography usage needs. The a7R II also has about 2/3 stop more dynamic range and sees more colors with a wider color depth.

[@BurakDogan55]

I want to buy one of them. Which one? Sony A7S II or A7R II ? What is your advices?

[@BandH]

Doug Guerra, from B&H, breaks down the key similarities and differences between the a7R II and the a7S II. Both cameras share the updated body design, five-axis in-body image stabilization that was first introduced by the a7 II, as well as offering advanced video features such as internal 4K recording and S-Log gamma settings. However, each camera offers its own distinct advantages for photographers and videographers. The a7R II, with its 42MP back side illuminated sensor and 399-point phase-detection autofocus, delivers high-resolution still images, while the a7S II features a 12.2MP sensor that’s optimized for low-light sensitivity and full-frame 4K quality, while also adding additional video-specific features. Which camera is right for you? Watch the video to find out! bit.ly/28MKwbu >Mark

[@WearySisyphus]

i'd love to know your opinion on GH5s vs A7sII for independent cinema/documentary. I'd love to record videos in 10bits but at the same time I really prefer full frame bokehs

[@BandH]

Both are great options and it really will be a matter of which way you want to go. You have laid out the heart of the differences between these cameras. The GH5s offers 10-Bit recording, it also offers 4K at up to 60fps and higher bit rates for the files. While the A7SII is a full frame camera that works exceptionally in low light conditions. Which of these features is most important to you will determine the right choice for you. Thanks! -Joey P

[@irun2sanaxox]

Since the auto focus is kinda bad on the a7sii is it better to jus use manual focus

[@Paytonwh]

Why isn't the slog 2 vs slog 3 a major reason to buy the s ii over the r ii? Will the slog 3 that the As7 ii delivers get me further away from a dslr look than the A7r ii after its graded? I know lighting is the biggest factor in that but which camera would you recommended?

[@BandH]

Slog 3 is a higher gamma curve and will provide better shadows with a contrast. Slog 3 would be better for cinematic editing and color correction , and would be closer to a cinema camcorder than a DSLR. *Andrea

[@syedsalmananik]

Hi would you please answer me one question? Does a7s2 record 1080p hd video ONLY in apsc mode? or It can shoot 1080p in Full frame mode?

[@ChrisBoland]

I picked up on this too. It was just badly worded - the S2 can definitely record 1080p in full frame mode. Rather than saying it can only record 1080 in APSC, they meant - in APSC it can only record 1080p - ie, no 4K In APSC.

[@69_MK]

Thanks

[@BandH]

+Salman Anik, the A7S II can record full HD video using the full pixel readout of the sensor.

[@davidmurray5926]

Great video, thank you. What's the lens at 5:38 please?

[@haroldfinch8019]

Wait so I can only film in 1080p in crop mode for the A7Sii?

[@MrAnthonyjmorrow]

Only for 1080p at 120fps it is. If you shoot at even 1080p 60 fps its full frame.

[@anushka4099]

They´re both full frame cameras mate

[@AusnahmeSchoen]

Hi there, when you compare bot cameras (7rii and7sii) with the girl sitting on the stairs, what picture profile you chose on both cameras and did you shot it in crop mode 1080p or 4k on the 7rii? And last one: one this particular shot, did you add any noise reduction in post? Thank you so much

[@BandH]

+Markisen Marco - Unfortunately, Chase Kubasiak from Zacuto doesn’t mention what picture profile they shot the test shots in. As for noise reduction, I don’t know if they used any in post, though one would think for a comparison they would want to touch the files as little as possible in order to display an accurate account of what the video looks like out of the camera. The test with the girl sitting on the porch would be comparing the low light performance of the a7R II when shot in APS-C mode and the a7S II shot full frame both with 1080 video. *Christina* [e-mail]

[@phynesse2000]

Wait.. no rolling shutter, no high ISO, no slow mo comparison?? 0_O

[@dmacrolens]

All of that was covered towards the end. It's too bad people generally aren't somehow able to watch a whole video before commenting something stupid on it..

[@tirondarshana193]

hi I am Videographer, what is best for me ?

[@ps2-cocpo772]

get the a7s II or the a6500 :D

[@danieldelgadore1240]

Agree! ^

[@ImanikaySABproduction]

why is the whole video "flickering"

[@BandH]

+Imani kay - Try playing the video at a higher rate. On the bottom right hand of the screen if you click on the "settings" icon, there is an option there to adjust the quality, make sure the speed is set to normal. - Yossi

[@ImanikaySABproduction]

+B and H it was set to normal and hd, but I think it's just me. Could be KZbin's compression. It felt as if the video encoding wasn't that good.

[@BandH]

+Imani kay The encoding is just fine and it looks great on even the basic monitors I'm using. Mark S

[@JustusWeiss]

What is the point of APSC mode ?

[@BandH]

With the a7R II, shooting in the APS-C mode (super 35) has several advantages: it allows for full-pixel readout, which can result in sharper video; it has less noise at higher ISO; and one can use more lenses. *Christina* [e-mail]

[@vishweshwarkandalgaonkar3446]

nice comparison

[@amiri679]

How about the photo quality?

[@BandH]

+AM679 Hello. There's a part I completely on the photo qualities: kzbin.info/www/bejne/pGnTnKZ7ramSbJY​

[@justindbutler87]

+AM679 the title reads "Video Comparison" for this particular youtube video.

[@dmacrolens]

Yes it does. That's no excuse for not watching the video before asking questions about it.

[@haroldfinch8019]

So basically is that the A7R 2 is better if in the crop mode...

[@CoalClear]

why wasnt this uploaded in 4k tho lol

[@AiurMedia]

i've decided, i want a sII, now somebody give me a small loan of 3 thousand dollars plz

[@kitefilmkh]

Same Here :D

[@7LiquidSnake]

More or Moire? Just saying...

[@siey2]

great video

[@Mista_G]

This was a great video but the presenter is acting a bit awkward, needs to loosen up a bit

[@Branmannn395]

its not "mk. ii" ... lol its just "ii". this is not canon

[@ksreddy]

Why do you keep saying "mark" 2?? You are mixing Sony and Canon terminology!!

[@enbüyüksamsun]

mark=generation=version

[@lcafilms7577]

+Troll literally it makes sense. But conventionally "mark" is used by Canon as you already know. It is just confusing when people use "mark" for Sony products. It kinda gives an impression that the people who use "mark" for Sony products have used Canon a lot previously and don't want to give up the language for one reason or other.

[@dmacrolens]

No, it only gives the impression that this only matters to people very concerned about things that don't matter.

[@krishnansrinivasan830]

Nice :)

[@JSRMedia]

FIRST!!!