Video of the accident of the supersonic missile-bomber Tu-22M3

The collapse of a supersonic bomber Tu-22M3 bomber
The incident occurred at the airfield Shaikovka (Kaluga region)
The cause of the accident was the failure of the speed sensors during the run. The sensors could refuse due to water entering from the sump of the system into the speed metering line during longitudinal acceleration during the takeoff run.

[@madwax4771]

"Blyat, Sergei, This Tu-22M3 has turned into an Uaz 4x4"

[@bboyo8307]

Xd

[@F_Tim1961]

Except the Gas mileage is a bit below the curve really. And spares out in the Taiga are hard to come by...:-) TIm Fidler

[@user-fs2mz5ro3u]

👍

[@mandh14]

Not everyday you see a TU-22 off roading!

[@moparchallenger749]

Norse King Bet that had their full attention 😄 Lucky crew👍

[@billhuber2964]

Versatile aircraft . thank God the crew is ok .

[@VadymVolodko]

The chassis was not replaced with an off-road chassis.

[@gogogeedus]

@@billhuber2964 That is a miracle!

[@F_Tim1961]

Not every day the Kremlin has to stump up the panel beating bill for a TU-22 off roading either..

[@rickandersonjr9150]

A pretty good testament to airframe durability and conscious placement of fuel that this wasn’t a huge fireball! I very much dislike seeing the misfortune of any airmen or beautiful aircraft, nationality be damned! Glad to hear these guys were ok.

[@kurtfrancis4621]

Good engineering.

[@josephmathers2211]

Tbh, there was another crash when one of the aircraft was descending to land in poor weather conditions, it's sink rare was far too high and it hit the runway heavily- causing the entire front portion of the aircraft to break off and burst into flames , meanwhile the rear section continued to fly for 50 meters or so and then hit and fireballed Only 1 of the crew survived, In my opinion the aircraft is actually quite fragile, then again considering the force of the impact perhaps no aircraft would have withstood it

[@reddogchi]

@@josephmathers2211 It's featured at the end of this YT video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/bJeVnXSto92aitk

[@canlib]

Komrad trump thanks you

[@luchatrokaalvaradoguajardo5185]

It's true all over the WORLD We love the planes designed in the Soviet era more

[@chuckvan1568]

Yikes! I was expecting a fireball at the end. Glad everyone survived.

[@lawfulldick4158]

Nyet, ran out of fuel halfway.

[@tyleehamauku413]

Maybe accidental deployment

[@robjtko]

In most cases you would have seen a big fireball with a monstrous plane like this. Especially when that wing broke spilling the fuel. Didn’t I see the wing break??

[@reigels]

Any take off you can walk away from is a good one!

[@johnhanson9245]

Except he never took off.

[@c0r1nth14n_]

Aborted take-off therefore aborted landing as well. :D

[@Jdalio5]

@@johnhanson9245 1 out of 3 gear left the ground so its technically a takeoff

[@tacticalcuddles3160]

In my eyes a good takeoff is one that succseeds

[@aloysiouskatschmarek8905]

The typically robust landing gear of most Soviet aircraft was a godsend to this crew.

[@Skank_and_Gutterboy]

You're stoned if you think the landing gear survived that. All three gear sheared off, which is by-design and actually safer.

[@TrevorSachko]

Jesus H, some serious drug use right there.

[@thexchox1554]

@@Skank_and_GutterboyBro… watch that video again… that thing sent it through the bush a couple hundred yards before anything major happened. I can’t think of any supersonic bomber that could have done that.

[@thexchox1554]

@@TrevorSachko Dude. Watch that video again… that thing sent it through the bush a couple hundred yards before anything major happened. I can’t think of any supersonic bomber that could have done that.

[@TrevorSachko]

@@thexchox1554 Oh dear. You seem to know little about how aircraft work. End result, aircraft was toast. Muptard...

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

Looks like he abandoned take off too late, but these Tu-22 planes were tough to get airborne at the best of times and need long runways. Glad they survived ok.

[@justadudeffs]

I guess you could say their plans for taking off Backfired...🥁

[@THE-BUNKEN-DRUM]

"Badabum, tsh"

[@Southwest_923WR]

🤣

[@frankparts2210]

Its wierd that no one was "Rushin" to help out

[@hededcdn]

That was amazing!

[@FreezeAU]

I see what you did there

[@dluisgabriel]

Russian aircraft fuel tank has proved superb

[@ziedmefteh2658]

Has this bomber returned to service or is it still in maintenance ???

[@dluisgabriel]

@@ziedmefteh2658 upgraded, u can see this bomber ready upgrading project on russia insight chanel

[@AUmarcus]

Pity about the rest of it......

[@moparchallenger749]

Agreed 👍

[@jefftheriault7260]

@@ziedmefteh2658 Rough guess is it was a wright-off.

[@roberto8531]

It is with great pleasure that I can read comments from intelligent people referring to technical and objective conditions about this "failed take-off". It is a common accident, although not too frequent, and according to the explanation of several readers, it is clear that they are experts in aeronautics or pilots who analyze with a professional eye. Best regards

[@Nikolai358]

Интересует два вопроса: не верю, что на Ту-22 нет резервного прибора указателя скорости (спидометра), полностью независимого от основного. И второй: члены экипажа следят за скоростью от начала разбега. Почему же они решили прервать взлет после достижения V2?

[@rabseanin]

Бухие имхо

[@vasyvetrov2808]

И снова ответ лошкомойника.

[@nikgrey7334]

During takeoff, due to water ingress, the speed sensor failed, so the crew decided to stop takeoff, and since the plane was fully fueled, the takeoff run was greater, therefore, when the takeoff was stopped, the runway was not enough

[@des_smith7658]

Peto sensors once again

[@bruce2357]

@@des_smith7658 The word is pitot.

[@thekingsilverado3266]

No no no... TSB investigators found too much Wodka in the injectors and behind the stick... Case was closed with the full report...

[@user-sy1tw2fs5g]

Насчёт попадания воды.Откуда ей взяться,если даже дождя не наблюдается.Это явное нарушение правил обслуживания авиационной техники.

[@morfinagidrohlorid-nf6kp]

​@@user-sy1tw2fs5g командир экипажа вроде принимает - а инженер сдаёт под роспись?

[@uthermaceanruig5098]

Glad the crew wasn’t hurt.

[@an1473]

That was a take-off, not a landing.

[@archiesantos7627]

an 147 ...well that was the quickest landing after a take-off

[@Coluchiy84]

Its aborted take off.

[@dhanasekar5788]

It is a take-off man look the parachute

[@everyone5724]

Speed sensors malfunctioned due to water entering them during acceleration.

[@tomsmith5947]

Aborted take off. You should see a F111 abort and slam the departure end barrier sometime, 4 tapes, 4 motors and still pull 1200+ feet.

[@tuurborgers7584]

When you just changed the keybindings on your pc and still not used to it

[@adysdelicias1465]

Was 4x4 an option for those ?

[@pinebankmarty]

Must have been bloody serious to abort so late into the takeoff run. I was under the impression that late on you are committed,assuming it reached V1 but there seems to be no attempt at rotate. Very lucky it didn't go bang! Hopefully crew are safe.

[@jochenheiden]

Martin Mc Parland The exception to the V1 rule is if the pilot reasonably feels the plane simply will not fly if it gets into air, and it’s safer to overrun than continue the takeoff in an aircraft that has no flight controls.

[@pinebankmarty]

Jochen Heiden nice one,we live and learn!

[@jochenheiden]

Martin Mc Parland if you’re interested in this topic google Omega Air Refueling crash at Point Mugu in 2011. A Boeing 707 rotated and left the ground and 20 feet airborne the #2 engine came off the wing. Captain put it back down and overrun but survived. That plane was not airworthy despite being well into V2 speed.

[@pinebankmarty]

Jochen Heiden will have a look for that now. Thank you sir,have a great new year!

[@everyone5724]

Read the description. There's secret info in there.

[@gerryquinn8390]

"That's coming out of your wages"

[@wcresponder]

What wages?

[@boltar2003]

That pilot has a great career ahead working for Aeroflot.

[@seltaeb3302]

Aeroflop..

[@revolutionnow5227]

@Jeniffer Bachtold nobody gives a shit about your stupid scam lol . An then you have another clown comment that it works .

[@okmas88]

На выкатной как всегда съэкономили....

[@MrP020372]

А почему он не взлетел?

[@mikedee8876]

damn lucky...no fire

[@fdryer5116]

Criticism can go both ways. This Russian bomber debuted in 1962 and upgraded. The US have B-52 bombers from the same era with upgrades. While this landing (or aborted takeoff) didn't result in deaths, A B-52 flown by a cowboy jockey did destroy one in a low level airshow unauthorized turn, killing all on board. The USA and Russia as well as many nations with sophisticated air forces have run up training deaths whether from poorly maintained aircraft, unauthorized maneuvers or just plain accidents. One B-2 stealth bomber crashed just after takeoff with both pilots ejecting safely. Laughing at our nemesis when America makes mistakes, throwing epithets at each other is simply childish and a reason many here aren't in the position to make life and death decisions piloting multimillion dollar aircraft. Military pilots fully accept risks with some dying to be among the best. Any of you man enough to restrain yourself when a decision comes from high up to launch a nuclear weapon from land, air or at sea? Only the mature and disciplined of men and women take up a responsibility that can alter history - WW III. A war to end mankind as we know it. Whether Russian or American, aircraft crashes are part of military service to prepare for the worst while hoping never to use weapons that can bring civilization to a standstill.

[@maxfisher7374]

Why do you give this comparison?

[@My-Pal-Hal]

Well,.. Give them the benefit of the doubt at least. I'm sure they could have Crashed SPECTACULARLY. If they could have gotten off the Ground 😂

[@nicolasdomouse9052]

One of the parachute didn't open correctly. And no joke how many Jets and military war ships been crashed especially in Japan. RUSSIA rocks

[@andrewbates1695]

maybe you should look up the incident with the B52 at Fairchild AFB and the reasons behind it.

[@fdryer5116]

@@maxfisher7374 My comments are directed to criticism from armchair quarterbacks with zero empathy, displaced patriotism, low self esteem.

[@bertg.6056]

That aircraft must be built like a tank. No fuel spillage, no fire. Amazing. The question remains, why was the takeoff aborted?

[@waltonwarrior7428]

Can only assume that he was rapidly approaching V1 and didn't have the air speed to lift off. Must have had some kind of power issue. Hard to tell for sure but it looks like he might have waited to long to abort. Appears the crew survived. Thank goodness there was no fire.

[@davidwood2205]

The speed sensor was fouled with water. The crew had no indicated speed. Unsure of how fast they were going, they rejected the take off.

[@acajutla]

Is it so hard to estimate the speed in daylight, that you have to crash the plane?

[@TrevorSachko]

@@waltonwarrior7428 Why? Frying alive is quite fitting for katsaps...

[@romanivanov2730]

@@acajutla ☝️👏

[@msb3235]

So what happened to the aircraft? Is it written off or they just hammered the fuselage here and there, give a new wheels and fly again tomorrow?

[@fredferd965]

Dang, that's hard on the paint job!

[@mboyer68]

I think only a Russian would just continue taking video and not say a word or look away. And that's not a bad thing!

[@user-rq4fw9se8s]

Great comment!

[@chadhosmer9357]

Those pilots were extremely lucky to have lived after this disaster. I wonder why it never lifted off? It looked like they had plenty of speed to take off.

[@szennyvizcsatorna2483]

According to released informations, the pitot tube failed (frozen?) during takeoff roll, and without proper speed reading they decided to abort, because is uncontrollable without that data.

[@wkgurr]

In any "normal" aircraft there are at least 2 most likely three independent pitot tubes and thus speed readings - speedometers. It is very unlikely that all three tubes fail at the same moment (they seem to have done so in AF 447 but this was a very different situation). My guess here would be (assuming pitot tubes were actually involved in this accident) that this was a failure of the pilot(s) to check speed readings obtained from back up pitot tubes and compare them with the readings from the failed one. In a "normal" aicrcraft all you need to do is flip a switch to set speed readings to the working pitots. But this requires fast thinking and if possible good CRM. Since this was not in winter - as the video shows - there is no mechanism for all pitots to freeze at the same moment, such as seemd to have happened in AF447. @@szennyvizcsatorna2483

[@phapnui]

I noted the name on the bomber was "Cyka Blyat".

[@phapnui]

S R kzbin.info/www/bejne/mKCYi4mbZrF7rrc

[@osamabinladen824]

I don't get it.

[@RomanKuznetsovLameFrog]

voice behind scene: взлёт экипажа Шилова / takeoff of the Shilov (second name of crew comander) crew. It was aborted takeoff

[@floks700]

Of course not. Russian pilots call this plane an awl (шило).

[@rabseanin]

Алкашилова

[@user-ed8xo9tf9x]

@@floks700 awl is TU22. Without M. A completely different plane.

[@Noscrap909]

That’s some real grassroots flying

[@rus5537]

А у других тоже не показывали приборы скорости? В самолёте два датчика на скорость по бокам самолёта стоят. У нас стояли такие ранее. Только я техником на других был. Странно как то. Жалко самолёт ТУ-22 М-3. Корову на нашем аэродроме грузили в Особенности Национальной Охоты.

[@egorandreev2586]

Грузили корову в Ту-22М3, выруливал Ту-22М2, а проход над аэродромом делал Су-24...)) "Особеннолсти национальной съёмки" кино...)))

[@user-rb2df2cx8q]

That s why it’s necessary to calculate V1 speed...

[@ricardohernadez4525]

Why does it says "landing" on the description when obviously was trying to take off?

[@bobwarren3898]

Russians lie a lot.

[@50AHenry]

A great shame and one can only imagine how the pilot(s) felt - even if it was not their fault. Pleased no-one was hurt.

[@erikrigt4294]

they all died

[@TrevorSachko]

The pilots were most likely drunk...

[@hammer-r]

Sent to Siberia for re-education. 😂

[@sky_fl350]

​@@hammer-r Seriously? Good morning dude, Russia haven’t sent people to Siberia for 40 years.

[@87mini]

@@sky_fl350 Yeah, Just ask them! 🙄

[@apieceofdirt4681]

Damn. Hope the crew is ok

[@user-tj7dw8fj9w]

Слава богу, что обошлось без пожара. Лётчики целы - это главное. А технику починят, бывает во всех странах.

[@mykhaylolemeshko530]

Плохо.так и надо.больше би такого.

[@denvvv187]

Все правильно сделал. Никакое железо не стоит жизней экипажа.

[@user-jv5oe7fy2h]

Абсолютная вина командира!Нужно было взлететь развернуться и сесть датчик по топливу это не причина чтобы прекращать взлёт,тем более что с точкой невозврата явно запоздали

[@denvvv187]

@@user-jv5oe7fy2h Еще один недоучка... В описании написано что у самолета отказал датчик скорости а не топлива. Как ты на таком самолете собираешься садиться с отказавшим датчиком скорости?

[@user-jv5oe7fy2h]

@@denvvv187 Признаю свою вину,Степень,тяжесть,Глубину!..😊

[@rickdavis3593]

Are you sure this is a M3 model of the Tu-22? If not, would explain why they stayed with the plane, older models have downward firing ejection seats.

[@maxfisher7374]

The fact that this is a modification of the M3 even the schoolboy knows about it

[@rickdavis3593]

So the latest, greatest model of the Tu-22 still sucks.....funny.

[@hyime69]

Looking at the Take off run I was looking at the Leading edge devices on the L/H wing they seemed to be further out than the R/H wings Plus the Runway looks very short for an aircraft of this size Oh well it didn't go well ,

[@Roybwatchin]

10 out of 10 for the cameraman, he held the plane in the frame all the way through. 2 out of 10 on video resolution.

[@zapa1pnt]

Well, this was 5 years ago. Not everyone could afford high res.

[@cotal240463]

было, есть и будет это в любой авиации, не зависимо от стран и пилотов!

[@seymourscagnetti1413]

Напоминает мне реальный случай Второй мировой войны: Увидев, что бомбардировщик B-17 был смертельно ранен, немецкий летчик-истребитель прекратил огонь по самолету и его экипажу. Немецкий пилот пролетел рядом с бомбардировщиком, узнал пилотов B-17 и продолжил сопровождать бомбардировщик над немецкой укрепленной территорией и мимо нее. Вот статья из Вики: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Brown_and_Franz_Stigler_incident Reminds me of a true WWII incident: Seeing that a B-17 bomber was mortally wounded, a German fighter pilot ceased fire on the plane and it's crew. The German pilot flew along side the bomber, acknowleged the B-17 pilots and proceeded to escort the bomber over and past German fortified territory. Here is the article from Wiki: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Brown_and_Franz_Stigler_incident Cheers Comrade.

[@johnphelan6623]

Ladna 👍

[@Лис-Приморский]

Да помню как при полной заправке с двумя ракетами они в жару от последней плиты отрываются смотреть страшно

[@user-nt9nd8uk3m]

Только у вас русских рукожопов слишком часто бывает таких случаев - вы полные рекордсмены!!! :)))))

[@romanivanov2730]

@@Лис-Приморский Я вот задаюсь вопросом - Почему в минобороне головой не подумают и аэродромы где их эксплуатируют не удлинят?!

[@andreyandrey756]

Вот она школа, скорость отказала, давай по тормозам рвать после V1, пусть в церковь ходят что не загорелись

[@88njtrigg88]

Happy to read in comments that pilots & flight crew are ok.

[@erickohlhorst747]

I see flat wings, are there no leading edge slats or flaps to extend before takeoff?

[@BMyVision]

When you watch Russian dash cam video, this makes perfect sense.

[@Southwest_923WR]

Stupid.

[@Alex-to2ex]

Go fuk ur self! 😀

[@dalethelander3781]

Totally underrated comment.

[@FRITZI999]

TRUE !!!

[@dalethelander3781]

"CYKA BLYAT!"

[@docfaceful]

"Are we there yet?"

[@maxfisher7374]

no

[@barnaclewatcher4060]

That's one reason to conduct a performance accelerate check airspeed at a specific distance down the runway after starting the takeoff roll. This check distance is usually 1,000 to 2,000 feet (300 to 600 meters) down the runway and compares actual acceleration to that based on required aircraft performance to conditions. If the speed is less than that required, then the takeoff can be aborted early in the takeoff run.

[@georgerivera9974]

I've seen quite a few videos where Russian planes use up all the runway and barely bite air, skimming tree tops as they climb. This Pilot In Command must have thought he could do it again because he waited until almost the last moment to deploy his drag cute.

[@joehughes5177]

Ive watched it 5 times now, specifically for the exhaust. While the view is off angle, it truly looks like the starboard engine is the only one turning. Half thrust ends in no go.

[@df446]

Was this filmed with a potato?

[@paulgray2387]

Good to see a quick response from the airfield fire and rescue services.

[@user-jv2mf6pw6z]

Я как диванный эксперт считаю надо мягко тянуть на себя до отрыва передней стойки. Даже пусть взлёт будет на бОльшей скорости. А что скажут не диванные эксперты?

[@muskelwerwolfchin1005]

Hallo wolte der Pilot Start abheben ? Und hat die Machine nicht hoch bekommen weil der last zu schwer war ? Und deswegen schnell bremschirm hausgemacht und schup raus und Brems Rad voll bremsung eingeleitet ? Bitte mir irgtenjemand mir schreiben der das weiß danke

[@gladiator_gladiolus]

При выполнении взлёта с аэродрома Шайковка (Калужская область), в процессе разбега, из-за возникшей разницы показаний скорости у членов экипажа, КК принял решение об экстренном прекращении взлёта. Самолёт (RF-94233 красный) выкатился за пределы ВПП на 800 метров на грунт, подломив стойки шасси. Экипаж жив, самолёт восстановлению не подлежит.

[@morfinagidrohlorid-nf6kp]

МЛя... А технари перед вылетом что делали? Доложили видимо что борт готов? И на кого н-нную сумму повесили? Кто платить то за ущерб будет?

[@user-bq8pt6lw1d]

Надо было взлетать без спидометра, набрать скорость побольше на взгляд, по опыту………😢

[@user-bd4nd9qq6f]

А ты сидел когда нибудь за штурвалом? У меня тоже был такой отказ и тоже прекращал взлет,на другом типе правда,но полосы хватило. Здесь же монстр! На глаз ничего не определишь. Если взлететь еще как то можно,то при заходе дров наломаешь точно слава богу все живы. Продолжил бы взлет,была бы катастрофа.

[@user-kz8fi5nl5p]

@@user-bd4nd9qq6f Мне лень искать , но у него кроме основного неверно ещё есть и пара дополнительных ПВД с своими УС .

[@cubdukat]

Did they abort the takeoff and deploy the chutes, or was that accidental?

[@knightsportsfc3s]

Goes to show you what a well built aircraft can survive...

[@baigish100]

It's so sad to see damage to such a beautiful aircraft. It's amazing how robustly Russian/Soviet aircraft were constructed!

[@stephanelavagna9527]

Glad to know that pilots were not injured there ;)

[@obsoleteprofessor2034]

Lucky there was no fire. Was it bad instrumentation or was it actually too slow to lift off?

[@johnrhoades6214]

So does anybody know if you can take off with the sensor not functioning properly please let me know I think it would explain a whole lot about this crash he pulled the shoot way to far past the point of no return I think I would have at least tried to lift off . If the sensor would allow absolute and it looks like the runway is just too short for that plane unless it's a emergency just landing

[@sam-n7nevada370]

DAMN excuse me ! I FORGOT TO FEED THE CAT BEFORE LEAVING 😆

[@Southwest_923WR]

🤔

[@routman28]

My gold fiches !!! 😱😱😱

[@user-pf2uc3jq9e]

Я не специалист но сразу заметил, очень медленно разгоняется, ему и две полосы нехватилобы.

[@raduflorin479]

Perfect reaction! Congratulation capitan!

[@eduardomendez775]

Bullshit

[@nicepush2574]

No dash cam on this one?

[@decaluwejean-noel7244]

Look at the heat coming from the exhausts. It looks like they lost one of their two engines just 2 seconds before releasing the parachute.

[@OOpSjm]

They were aborting the take off run

[@Tamburello_1994]

No. Off the throttles at that point

[@ndr1111]

меня всегда удивляло, ну неужели так трудно и дорого на всякий случай хотя-бы бульдозерави уровнять типа продолжение полосы ? ну ведь стоит это копейки, сберегли-бы самолет. эх (

[@RISHUS174]

+1

[@samuraisamurai41]

Ну да, это же не интересно было бы! А подумать о безопасности, на всякий случай, это не по нашему!

[@user-ku2nr3jq5f]

+2

[@drsklif]

А можно полосу километров 10 построить как во всем мире делают... Как так 3км во всем мире???

[@LeonKeda]

Если позволяет ландшафт, торцевые полосы безопасности выровнивают не менее, чем на триста метров, и не только бульдозером, но и грейдерами, а затем укатывают уплотнителями грунта. В данном случае самолёт был слишком тяжёлым и решение о прекращении взлёта было принято слишком поздно, потому такие последствия. К сведению, максимальный взлетный вес этого типа ла превышает 120 тонн. В ролике видно, что за торцом ВПП ровный участок, как и положено. Левая стойка подломилась от ударов о стойки светотехнического оборудования, а левая потому, что пилот пытался уклониться вправо от столкновения с курсовым маяком на оси ВПП, в ролике видна антенна, не уверен, но вероятно это она. При отсутствии различного оборудования за торцом, ЛА остался бы абсооютно цел.

[@Razorbill_]

Нерабочий указатель скорости причина для перерыва взлёта? Есть же запасные приборы...странно

[@robertheinkel6225]

Looks like the flaps were not extended until after the drag chute was deployed. The stab trim was in the full nose up position. Makes me wonder if the flight controls were ever set for takeoff position, in addition to some other failures.

[@Southwest_923WR]

BINGO! SOMEBODY SAW IT AS ALSO!!!!

[@user-in3il3he8m]

Как будто без прибора не видно что скорость растёт!

[@user-bs6uf9tq6u]

А потом на посадку как он будет без указателя скорости содиться??? Вы прежде чем ляпнут подумайте.

[@pauljohnson7382]

Da..Da..Da..Nah..Nah..Nahhhh Damn...

[@CocoaBeachLiving]

You know the engineers didn't get much sleep following the incident..glad no one was injured.

[@evilelf5967]

was that a speed camera at the end? points and a fine on their way mr pilotski

[@Southwest_923WR]

Stupid.

[@nunessilva2162]

There are some situations when it helps if your plane is build like a tractor.. That landing gear was build to land in rough terrain and basically saved the plane from cartwheeling in to a fireball Amazing engineering

[@user-os5tw9ki1i]

Это шасси НИКОГДА не создавалось для приземления на пересеченной местности.

[@nunessilva2162]

@@user-os5tw9ki1i All Soviet planes were built to land on everything else but a runway.... go read some more. Don't take my word for it

[@TrevorSachko]

Ummmm.... the undercarriage sheared off an soon as it went agricultural...

[@antiglobaljoel532]

Ему не хватало скорости полета, и он знал это, отсюда и парашют. Надеюсь, с ними все в порядке.

[@Classic63EType]

OOOPSKI! Hopefully no one was seriously injured or killed. Metal can be easily replaced, not pilots.

[@fortniterobloxpro6774]

earth: *earths runs out of metal* Oh well i guess no more Tu-22M3 long rang bombers for you guys!

[@fukhue8226]

The parachute popped out just after the "Oh Shitski" line was crossed. What a technological achievement. It went just fast enough to crash but not fast enough to fly!

[@valeriyorekhov7049]

принудительно всех бы катапультировал

[@bulategbulateg206]

И такое бывает, что же тут поделать. Не падают те, кто не летает!

[@dmitryl9324]

Так это даже не взлетел

[@paseka69]

Ему не даётся взлёт. Это был уже третий им разбитый самолёт.

[@CONTACTLIGHTTOMMY]

Pats on the back for the factory fuel tank welder.

[@buckbuchanan5849]

Massive forward CG issue?

[@rmwestjr]

I wonder if the brake chutes deployed accidentally/prematurely?

[@OCnStiggs]

"Lucky was built at People's Tractor Factory #12!" (Glad the crew survived.)

[@nikofpv]

before saying they survived, I would wait they explain to Vladimir what happened ^^

[@pnotuner1]

Good one

[@pauls7956]

That is what I call a ground attack aircraft.

[@kriztlumburt714]

It attacked the ground immediately past the after end of the runway. They must have a superb weapon’s officer on-board! 💥

[@bsv244]

Теперь там вообще ничего не показывает. Вообще в начале разбега обычно даже команду подают "скорость пошла". А если она не пошла, чего сразу не прервали? И ппошли ли они скорость принятия решения? Явно безопаснее было продолжить взлет.

[@Major_Tamre_Colby]

Ouch. I wouldn't want to be that test pilot. I hope the crew survived.

[@My-Pal-Hal]

Guess it's OFF-ROAD capabilities leave something to be desired 😂

[@My-Pal-Hal]

@Sam Shit Happens 😂

[@billyost1479]

I don't know... it probably passed that test... it's the takeoff that failed. The off-road part was EPIC!

[@fdryer5116]

@@billyost1479 Yeah but does it have AWD?

[@TheCokoll]

@@fdryer5116 technically yes) a 200% awd)) its engines dont giva a shit about surface traction) but the front ones are too small))

[@triplex2912]

TANGLDWEB Russian aircrews are the best! Well...They make me laugh 😂

[@kebo57]

The pilots survived the aborted takeoff, but... they were banished to coldest Siberia for 10 years!

[@user-yf8nn7gn2i]

А какой год, съёмки?

[@jesseduenes7380]

Looks like a great land craft

[@paulakal5023]

WORST TIME TO REJECT TAKE OFF

[@user-gr4vj4ex2z]

Снять с летной работы как профнепригодного. На аэродром близко не пускать. Не тот отказ, что бы гробить самолет . И разобраться с теми, кто его так научил

[@ksarizmenchivyi828]

Нормально рашке нужны такие налетчики

[@NikolTim]

@@ksarizmenchivyi828 Завидуй молча, диванный пилот!

[@NikolTim]

@tum nut с головой дружить надо,парень!

[@ksarizmenchivyi828]

@tum nut Хуйла в Гаагу

[@user-iq5iz4io3i]

Сейчас почти все такие...

[@melomane2010]

I'm not certain but it looks like around 0:48 the dark exhaust smoke was no longer visible - afterburners I presume - right before the drogue chute was deployed.

[@Tamburello_1994]

Pilot going to idle on the throttles

[@user-ry5ez1un1s]

Можно подробности про экипаж Шилова ? Давно ли летает на данном типе аппарата ? Давно ли служит в ВКС ? Успехи какие в учебе ? Я понимаю когда гражданские хоронят 65 человек , потому что не могут определить скорость при наборе высоты . Но тут при разбеге ... Можно просто на глаз прикинуть сколько отметок фиксированного расстояния за секунду проносится и посчитать скорость . Наземные средства контроля не дают информации о скорости захода на посадку ??? Странные дела в авиации ...

[@orgeebaharvin8892]

The Tu-22M3 is a magnificent beast!

[@davidrobinson4118]

A beast that roams the forest by the look of it!

[@repairdroid77]

Knowing Russian equipment that will be back in the air in no time. Glad nobody got killed.

[@garybaldwin1061]

What year.

[@SD-unlimited]

On both this video and the TU-22 that splits in half on landing the filmed says little to nothing. It’s interesting and strange that while bearing witness to a catastrophic event nothing is said. It makes for good video and a conversation as to why that is.

[@cheekymescalito3249]

Congratulations from Ukraine! What a good decision, captain.

[@plsniper]

Yeah, decision like a minute too late.

[@viacheslavorlov6247]

Полоса коротковата однако!!!

[@evaluateanalysis7974]

Perhaps they don't use the "V1" etc system for deciding when it's too late to abhort the take-off.

[@RuiPlaneSpotter]

🙏🏼🙏🏼