Speluncean explorers

[@MindfullHearts]

Outstanding presentation.Simplified a lot and a lot interesting as well!.Thanks for making it so.

[@evansjohnarek2271]

This man is is immensely superb in his presentation and legal of the world of jurisprudence. He made me to love the law of jurisprudence

[@irenemarting16]

Very helpful and interesting! It definitely widen my understanding of the case and made me think. At the end, no single judge is more right than the other.. Thanks a lot :-)

[@OsagiadeOsasumen]

I really enjoyed it, thank you soo much. This explanation is the most comprehensive of all.

[@tasha1014]

All your videos are very helpful. I dislike jurisprudence but watching your videos makes it easier to understand. May God bless you !

[@ThomasLenan-gk9xk]

Thank you so much. Fantastic analysis.

[@luzchavez-gutierrez723]

This was honestly very interesting and thought spurring. I really enjoyed listening to this, I am thinking of sharing this with my friends.

[@AzizBamyani]

a fantastic explanation of the case. thank you for the video

[@steven012784]

Thank you for making this video. helped me so much with finding the context for my paper and clarifying the information.

[@cutelilly1000vedios]

Woah, this case is crazy I keep switching between sides

[@Lexis001]

I love this guy!

[@abeerachauhan8162]

This is Absolutely helpul 🙏😇 u r a magician cleared all of ur queries st once regarding this case!! god bless u

[@mangikeysanneh5626]

This is absolutely helpful! Thank you

[@brianvent]

Have you shared the slide deck on slide share? I would love to have a copy and cite you in my paper - these are great views!

[@AakashSinghRathore]

I dont know what that is....

[@brianehwachi856]

Wonderful discussion. Thanks for the explanation.

[@shumieanita2485]

ndazozvihwa manje mupfanha anoexplainer uyu

[@isabelmoyo5572]

ah consel kokusazoudza vamwe kuti panemuface anonyatsa kuite explain the case lol.haaa anoziva kudzidzisa shuwa

[@brianehwachi856]

Isabel Moyo kkk counsel

[@solaimankhan7089]

Very very helpful... Thanks a lot to u....

[@shumieanita2485]

thank you so much for the helpful explanation great job

[@daleroller1208]

I remember giving my opinion on this in law school. It seems to me that the accused had three other choices instead on murdering Whetmore. 1.) They could of just removed extra body parts from him to consume that would have allowed him to live. His arms, legs, and buttocks looked delicious and he would have probably (maybe?) still have lived, and 2.) each of the explorers could have simply sacrificed one of their own limbs and committed auto-cannibalism, and 3.) one of those selfish bastards could have just committed suicide for the benefit of the others and no murder would have been committed. They should all be sentenced to DEATH because they all had other choices than to murder Whetmore. Murderous Bastards!!!!

[@AakashSinghRathore]

Nice take on this!

[@micaelamaidana983]

I immediately thought about the first two options when I first read it too..

[@columbus8myhw]

Can a biologist speak to those first two options? I feel like they wouldn't work

[@daleroller1208]

Sure, I would love some expert witness testimony.

[@sophiasomeone2668]

they could die from exsanguination

[@Lawrence-n9r]

The dude is super supurb in that he explains it clearly in that the deaf or the mentally I'll can understand it

[@Do.7784]

Very good presentation

[@VIEWMARY001]

For me they are guilty because they included and killed someone who opted out. Otherwise i will support the view of not guilty had they killed the person who opted in :)

[@JoeEmesomhi]

But at the same time, she sacrificed himself. They are guilty for me.

[@jocelynkatz9033]

But this is part of nature, though it’s not even like in a civil society they were sort of secluded

[@smarttechandeducation585]

@caught in Providence 😁

[@raviranjan-wc8xm]

great superb splendid awesome case

[@NabilLove-p1w]

Thanks prof

[@ayeshamohmand1924]

Thank u soooooooooo very much god bless u sir ..it was really helpful to mee loveeeeeee from pak...

[@chrisdvine]

critically, Whetmore pulled out before ANY dice had been rolled. This wasn't made entirely clear here, and could change some people's perspective on the outcome.

[@AakashSinghRathore]

This is stated at 2:50 and following, both by the speaker (me) and on the slide.

[@mahis5363]

actually, when he was picked they asked him if he had any objections and he did not.

[@jaiganesh4015]

usefull

[@Nathan-hs2ut]

Incredibly interesting right up until the point the (up till then excellent presenter) calls Critical Race Conspiracists "an interesting perspective". Unbelievably vacuous