Just like I told Richard Holdener several weeks ago during a live show, the cross ram is the best tunnel ram that fits under your stock hood. Chevy designed it because the SCCA Trans Am series rules said the carbs had to fit under the stock hood.
@neal64182 жыл бұрын
I really appreciate the cross ram..... my oldest brother had a Weiand cross ram on his 70 SS Camaro in the mid 70s it was just so cool looking and he didn't have to hack the SS hood
@dinadaughtry89932 жыл бұрын
Mopar built it first I thought, late fifties early sixties? max wedge?
@Naoj20242 жыл бұрын
Yeah, those PENSKE CAMAROS with a DZ 302 defeated the BOSS 302 mustangs in the 68 and 69 Trans AM series ..! 😎 I wish i had one of those cross rams the DZ 302 Camaros had under those hoods ..! CHEVROLET MOTOR COMPANY would not help Rodger Penske at all so he went to the AMC Javelins in 1970 😮
@albertgaspar6272 жыл бұрын
@@dinadaughtry8993 sorta. As the video says, engineers came up with the tunnel ram on their spare time and dime, cutting off the tubes until they hit the right formula. then they hung the runners over the valve covers of the 413, which sucked if you had solid lifters and needed to reset 'em every 3K. so they did the intake you're thinking of.
@mickangio164 ай бұрын
@@albertgaspar627 The more familiar Crossram came about on the '62 413 Max Wedge MoPar engines. The earlier over the valvecover intake system was called "Sonoramic" and I think was available on full size Chryslers until about '64 or '65.
@dondotterer242 жыл бұрын
If you want to modify the tunnel ram or the cross ram it's easier to balance out the ports and and modify the 5 and 7 ports to help out from Robing each other. Also you can put dams in the bottom of the crossram to help with fuel distribution. They did it with the Smokey rams.
@tarstarkusz2 жыл бұрын
This channel and this video is AWFUL. It's the same trash they show on TV. It's all fake. It's all dumb. Go watch Uncle Tony's Garage or Cold War Motors of any of a hundred other better shows made by real mechanics on real budgets without any of the fake drama.
@brad31392 жыл бұрын
ive only wanted to see a test like this for like 16 years now. love it!
@neal64182 жыл бұрын
I would sacrifice that little bit of power and choose the cross ram over the tunnel. No hood hacking 👍👍
@needmoreboost63692 жыл бұрын
Just saved me writing the same thing! The tower must match the power!
@freemansgarage2 жыл бұрын
@@needmoreboost6369 Did you mean to rhyme that time?
@ashleyjennings52242 жыл бұрын
Depending on the application hoods are relatively cheap enough that you could have one circumcised for the tunnel ram and uncircumcised for the cross.
@jdascout2 жыл бұрын
Once you get that cowl induction hood, I'm sure the hp would come up anyway. That little bit of boost goes a long way.
@neal64182 жыл бұрын
@@needmoreboost6369 👍 awesome
@rickhaile21902 жыл бұрын
Very informative! Too bad Dyno sessions are so expensive. And so few people have the experience and knowledge to run them! Keep making videos along these lines please!
@lollipop848584 ай бұрын
This is all a lie and you're making things up. All except the you not being able to afford it part
@Alwhite1929 Жыл бұрын
Love the looks and performance of that cross ram, great test.
@transmissionman93772 жыл бұрын
I love ALL the engine master stuff, great job.
@jerrycraig65222 жыл бұрын
I like the tunnel ram WAY better, it looks great on my truck, a 72 Chevy Cheyenne super, its a great little truck!!!
@richardturk71622 жыл бұрын
I have run a two 4 bbl Cross ram and a 3X 2bbl factory intake on my 71 Dodge Demon 340. The 3x2bbl actually performed the best.
@Texasmule Жыл бұрын
Probably because the smaller jets
@richardturk71627 ай бұрын
@@Texasmule The 3X2 bbls all had accelerator pumps ( came off a GM 409) so the total CFM was 1300. Actually I went back to the one thermoquad Carter to run in Super Stock class. The cross ram made the 340 very torquey and great for 1/8th use but it fell into a modified class and not near the power of the blown cars in the class.
@douglascrosby65362 жыл бұрын
Which begs the question, What would the cross-ram do with 1" or 2" carb spacers on it?
@Texasmule Жыл бұрын
Yes yes, we need to know!
@QUANTUMRESIN2 жыл бұрын
Fryburger is a genius in the car world! Love the Roadkill series with Finnegan! Best show on Motortrend
@MrTaylorTexas2 жыл бұрын
Great info. I'm about to put bigger heads and a weiand tunnel ram on my Chevy II , so this stuff is great to watch. It's surprising how well the cross ram performed when all the magazines I've ever read have said how soggy these manifolds are and one should stay away from them.
@AMCguy2 жыл бұрын
Crossram all the way! The sound is so cool. Plus if used like how the AMX scramblers first pioneered, with a forced induction hood. They can match a tunnel ram
@taylorhelm7146 Жыл бұрын
I have to say so far on my MotorTrend delve, Engine Masters has been my favorite episodes. You have the nerdy op for techies, power bangers for speed freaks, the close circle of coworkers/buddies meshing together on an objective topic, and the histroical nature to preserve information and numerical data. While I do enjoy Frieburger and Finnegan a bunch with the garbage builds, this show does give a scientific gravitas to further help the layman try to work on his rig on his own property.
@AndyFromBeaverton Жыл бұрын
I love the radiator hose setup. Put 4 Webers on and use steel belted radiator hoses and it would be a sweet-looking setup.
@Texasmule Жыл бұрын
Tunnel ram under $100.
@hortanium7 ай бұрын
You guy's are living the dreams of every motor head in high-school...atleast that's what I dreamed about...
@keithfilkins2043Ай бұрын
I love Engine Masters! Steve, you will be missed, enjoy your retirement!!!
@wintonhudelson22522 жыл бұрын
The very first tunnel ram I saw was home made from an early Rochester mechanical fuel injection manifold from a Corvette. It did pretty well. But today, it's considered heresy! LOL
@4speed3pedals2 жыл бұрын
I made the decision to purchase an Offenhausr Crossram for my '56 Chevy project a few years ago. I have just about got all the engine parts and I still have work to do on the block and maching. The engine is a 400 block with a 327 stroke, flat tappet cam (a copy of an original Off-Road Z cam both first and second stage) to begin with. I also have both the single 4 and the dual 4 top for this manifold. It is going to be fun to play around and see what combination I can come up with that is the most impressive for my budget. If the times are slower than expected, I will be upping the camshaft to something a bit more aggressive, maybe a mechanical roller. This is finally a video about the crossram that makes a sensible comparison of what can be expected. Thanks for posting this.
@youcanbesmartaskhow38572 жыл бұрын
I sold a polished Offy cross ram intake to a guy a few years ago, and he said it was going in a 56 Chevy. Northern Kentucky area. Havent seen the finished product but he had big plans for an unusual build.
@craigcontofalsky43872 жыл бұрын
Great show! Great video! I agree with another viewer. Test it on a 302 which it was designed for vs the tunnel ram.
@stevejewell9263 Жыл бұрын
Eh, I wouldn't expect a different result. If anything might be different.....it would almost certainly favor the tunnel ram even more so. The 302 is peanut sized and gives up power to larger displacement SBC. It's the engine Chevy never would have built if not for the strict 305cu in limitation in the race rules of Trans Am. The only advantage found in super short stroke 302 is it's ability to run to higher RPMs more safely than the longer stoke bigger displacement engines. With that said and looking at how the Cross Ram and Tunnel ram run really close together under 5000RPM and how the Tunnel Ram begins to show an advantage above that level......it's hard to imagine how the Tunnel Ram advantage doesn't just get even BIGGER as RPM increases in the Smaller Mouse Motor.
@FSHSKainon2 жыл бұрын
Love you guys !! Love these vids !!, thank you !!
@edwardpate61282 жыл бұрын
Hard to beat a good single plane 4 barrel setup all around.
@tahcogunworks2 жыл бұрын
Except it made worse power. Dude if you're going over 6900 rpm all the time maybe.
@TireSlayer55 Жыл бұрын
Umm did you not watch the video? It did the worst of the whole group 😂
@edmelberg11 ай бұрын
Gm knew what they were doing years ago! Go Roger and Smokey!
@VegasRT5002 жыл бұрын
I wish somebody would do a test on the Weiand SuperStock 440 sixpack tunnel ram P3690982 . I have always wondered if they make good power on a stroker performance engine or even stock 440.
@turbotempest409510 ай бұрын
I recently picked up an Edelbrock P22 dual-qual intake for 55-64 Pontiac 389's. The price was right and 1406's carbs are a dime a dozen used. That nostalgic look. The challenge of setting it up right. the P22 is a dual plane design.
@ouch10112 жыл бұрын
To me, this is the biggest benefit of proper port fuel injection. Not the Bolt on injection systems that are basically electronic carburetor, but real fuel injection. You can get a manifold with long runners (or variable length in some OEM applications) with substantially less issues with distribution. When it comes to tuning, fuel injection (especially the current batch of aftermarket solutions) are light years easier than trying to make individual jet and air bleed changes on multiple carburetors. On top of that, you get improved driveability, improved fuel economy and vastly improved cold starting.
@neal64182 жыл бұрын
yeah but it's not as cool or challenging.
@blythewarland54592 жыл бұрын
Basically an electronic carburettor- I like that term mind if I use it
@dylanzrim36352 жыл бұрын
The “electric carb” you speak of is a product they endorse for one... And for two, you can tune them... add some timing control via the ignition kit and you’ll blow any carb out the water. Cmon man the things read the O2 sensor and adjust fuelling for ideal ratios almost out of the box.
@needmoreboost63692 жыл бұрын
@@dylanzrim3635 and still offer all the fuel distribution issues of a single carb! and I speak from experience that tuning a Holley carb for start up and cold running is so much easier than the earlier edelbrock efi and even Holley sniper efi,yeah they self tune “sort of” but not like a good set of ears and nose can! Using a target rpm and a target mixture for a desired idle not having any means of ve tuning is a compromise a carby can do! not sure about some of the other carb looking systems some impressive features indeed! all have their merits especially for simplifying a conversion, though they all still have nothing on port injection and a Haltech or similar for management.
@phillippresley474110 ай бұрын
I luv a cross ram...even made several tops for the cross fire fuel injection intake manifold.
@richardholdener17272 жыл бұрын
great test D
@CarsandCats2 жыл бұрын
Modifying a Weiand tunnel ram for a BBM right now! The top was WAY off from matching the bottom and had to do a lot of port work. It's on my KZbin channel.
@dboogeman20022 жыл бұрын
Engine Masters!?!? I'm just seeing this for the first time. What a huge bag of useful information. Thank you
@RecklessEnterainment2 жыл бұрын
It’s a great show! Learned a lot from watching their tests.
@dboogeman20022 жыл бұрын
@@RecklessEnterainment I've really enjoyed watching Roadkill, and now I'm finding numerous other shows by the fellas. They are all good.
@thesquirrelchroniclesakare78082 жыл бұрын
Just saw Luckys video David. The Disgustang is looking good. Quite the opposite of what it started looking like !👍💪
@generalsixty21332 жыл бұрын
David Vizard could fix that tunnel ram.
@flexjay872 жыл бұрын
There is no more cool factor, than a tunnel Ram !
@stacygardner79592 жыл бұрын
Man I love this show
@Snake.br549 Жыл бұрын
We had a 69 road runner 383 Magnum with a tunnel ram it really did make a difference
@raywagner80162 жыл бұрын
Can't wait to try my old 6 Pack STR intake on my 440
@freemansgarage2 жыл бұрын
You lucky dog. Enjoy!
@markdubois4882 Жыл бұрын
Long ram = huge torque. Nick's Garage did a comparo on a 63 Chrysler 300J with a 413. The single quad had a higher horsepower rating, but the long ram intake delivered the torque in spades.
@brunsy19902 жыл бұрын
Cross ram makes for a better sleeper XD
@wernerkeggenhoff20652 жыл бұрын
How do you read afr in each cylinder ? O2 senser in each exhast tube ?
@jdascout2 жыл бұрын
As to driving styles. Being biased towards lateral g forces, vs wham bam thank you mame. The top end power would come in at the top end with forced air induction. Cowl induction allowing greater visibility, and induction. A win, win.
@lindsaymcpherson4744Күн бұрын
I love old school gear that runs hard
@gdfitzgibbon2 жыл бұрын
To make my engine tune closer from the beginning, ( Edelbrock crossram), care to divulge the jet sizes on all eight jets. I’m in Albuquerque so I’m just looking for someplace to start.
@noampitlik23322 жыл бұрын
About 17 guys got the "marvelous" allusion.
@dwightbrown28082 жыл бұрын
Could you do an Engine Masters with Weber down draft or side draft carbs some time. I used to have a 240Z with triple webers.
@inscoredbz2 жыл бұрын
So, what power did the Victor Jr make? What was the difference in power between it and the tunnel ram?
@johngood81072 жыл бұрын
I'm Speechless right now!🤣
@larrygilpin64292 жыл бұрын
What would happen if you put spacers under the carburetors on the cross ram also
@corvettejohn45072 жыл бұрын
Good question.
@ryanroberts11042 жыл бұрын
In the dyno room it looks like some old bank robbers getting ready for their last big heist.
@tonytronto7772 жыл бұрын
Each cylinders had o2 sensors so the could tell fuel to air ratio or each cylinder
@neal64182 жыл бұрын
yeah that's the way to go for sure. We didn't have that luxury in the 70s or 80s even
@NetNathan1 Жыл бұрын
I want t revisit your "Six Pack shootout" show. You should get a set of Holley carbs with mechanical secondaries. They were made. I had mine set up on bell-crank lnkage for 3/4 throttle before i brought in the out side carbs. No bog...just power
@jaysguyrage9483 Жыл бұрын
I wonder how that STR 20 would have worked with spacers, starting out with half inch and going up
@rotorr222 жыл бұрын
I could watch these vids all day. When it comes down to it, I would rather own and operate a dyno vs. having a race car. Then again, I'm old and sore 24/7.
@davidkepley96342 жыл бұрын
Am with you on that, was a race car chassis builder, got Crohn's disease, nerve damage, hurts to be alive
@Naoj20242 жыл бұрын
@@davidkepley9634 quit eating GLUTEN and see if ya feel better..? 😊😮
@mitchellferre16522 жыл бұрын
I always wanted to try the Weiand tunnel ram on my 440 mopar but wasn't sure about carb selection. Two 750 double pumpers or two edelbrock 750s ? Or two 600s ?
@jimmyjimbo612 жыл бұрын
Would love to know the specs of this engine. Compression, heads, cam and carb size...
@Bartman7472 жыл бұрын
Is the weind ram an isolated Runner that's perfect for single cylinder tuning I had one on a 68 Camaro big block though
@joekalmar8881 Жыл бұрын
I run a Mickey Thompson cross ram 383 SBC 11 :1 71 Monte Carlo awesome intake.
@richardrichard4394 Жыл бұрын
Can't wait to try my RSR (real street ram) on my L79 65 Acadian Canso CDN (chevy11) Ran a few Eddies w/660's in the 70's worked decent but this should be very streetable so I drive it more
@HitokiriRaiden2 жыл бұрын
Iv alway liked and prefered the cross ram for a street car myself.
@freemansgarage2 жыл бұрын
Yeah it's kind of hard to go wrong with that
@CCW19112 жыл бұрын
I wonder how the results would change if the cross ram was tested on a 302 like it was designed for? Maybe that absolute top end power would be there?
@jdascout2 жыл бұрын
The cross ram just needs it's cowl induction to reach higher hp.
@mikewillett50762 жыл бұрын
So instead of it simply being a larger engine makes it's power at a lower RPM with the cross ram, it's more of more intake pulses per second making it work, which needs a smaller engine to have that higher number.
@michaelatkin9649 Жыл бұрын
Omg... them all looking like bandits tearing the engine down 😆 🤣
@raiderjohnthemadbomber8666 Жыл бұрын
The Ford FE Series intake is 110# WITHOUT the carb. They called it fe for a reason.
@joe-hp4nk Жыл бұрын
The victor jr may have been around a long time, but it still out performs and is the best bang for the buck.
@TireSlayer55 Жыл бұрын
Did you even watch the video? It only made more power at redline
@chrissmith76692 жыл бұрын
I’d love to find a good cross ram for the SBC in my C3 Vette to hide under the stock crossfire air cleaners.. :-).
@buzzwaldron61956 ай бұрын
Or put 454 throttle bodies on your stock cross ram...
@robertbrissie8645 Жыл бұрын
What was the base HP and torque with the Victor single plane setup?
@williamhardes8081 Жыл бұрын
now that you have changed jets in the carbys it would be a more even comparison if you used those newly jetted carbs to redo the other manifolds first pulls? also for the baseline, of course.
@daviddavid58809 ай бұрын
I'm working on an old 360 D100 and thinking "Man that looks cool".... Looked up the cross ram and they are right. The cost is reflex-burst-out-laugh ridiculous.
@amarillo454 Жыл бұрын
Carroll Caudle invented the tunnel Ram!! Come on David
@ldnwholesale8552 Жыл бұрын
GM designed the cross ram for mid to high rpm use on road race cars. And more so the torquless Z28 302 engine. It is not a street manifold however
@theartofspeedguy Жыл бұрын
What size carbs and what cam lift duration CL
@exploranator2 жыл бұрын
Simultaneous-opening square carburetors with each runner physically divided from the other runners all the way to carb bottom would afford more control, but discard the benefits of the plenum.
@adammanmiller45462 жыл бұрын
Can you guys test the Thompson performance fuel plates that are supposed to help atomize fuel instead of it trickling in the Venturi they are $50 each
@Vince-jj8qs2 жыл бұрын
Thats Cool.
@moedog072 жыл бұрын
Come on, we all think about running one of these intakes on our engines with two Motorcraft 2100 2bbl carburetors on it. 😃
@kevincolestock77922 жыл бұрын
Really like the cross ram. Bet the power drops a bunch compared to the tunnel ram when put in the vehicle. Under hood temps will rob it. But ya won't have to cut the hood and it just looks cooler than a tunnel ram, imo.
@SuperOperator42 жыл бұрын
NOS the cross ram!!!!!!!!!!!!
@eric633772 жыл бұрын
You guys need to do a shoot out with Edelbrocks new VRS carburetor ve Holley 4150! Before someone else does!!
@keithpaluso2130 Жыл бұрын
Any videos on the fabricated dual quad intakes?
@dannywalker9008 Жыл бұрын
Can u run two spacers on the cross ram
@douglascooper19872 жыл бұрын
Now y'all should do some runs with a Single Top on the Cross Ram, say like NASCAR HEMI STYLE,and see what that looks like. Lots of Power and Very Efficient.👍👍
@volvobrynk Жыл бұрын
Do WEBERs! On Indipendant runners! That would be EPIC
@duke90492 жыл бұрын
wish i could still watch this in Aus
@mgmcd17 ай бұрын
So if you want the tunnel effect, but don’t want to cut a hole in your hood, that’s the manifold to get.
@Arthagnou2 жыл бұрын
i vote crossram...far more usable...the only downside is the hood doesnt have a giant hole in it allowing hot air to leave
@albertgaspar6272 жыл бұрын
then Chevy "played it again Sam" in the 1980's with their ceasefire CrossFire setup on Vettes and Z28's. I keep findin' 'em for $100 a pop, nearly makes me want to pass up $75 edelbrock single quad intakes with peeling paint.
@jimcrawford56032 жыл бұрын
CROSS RAM AND 2 THROTTLE BODIES !!!
@JrGoonior2 жыл бұрын
Didn't Chevy already do that with the 350 Corvette in 82 and the 305 in 83 or 84 in the Camaro/Firebird????
@jimcrawford56032 жыл бұрын
@@JrGoonior the factory intake had ports half the size of stock ports and the tbi's were small 2bbl
@timothythompson30292 жыл бұрын
What about the Offy dual quad low profile manifold?
@Ecosse57 Жыл бұрын
this i would like to see.
@jeremysmith13392 жыл бұрын
Hahaha..you guys rock!
@dagger64672 жыл бұрын
I think it may be time to test out the Leaning Tower of Power.
@countryjoe35512 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣
@localcrew2 жыл бұрын
You guys are a great looking group - when Dulcich’s hair is under control.
@smaggies2 жыл бұрын
I do miss 6 packs, need test them on that motor maybe..... :)
@teknoaija17622 жыл бұрын
I ve got a much better theory.Those intake manifolds were manufactured to make money for the company.
@TireSlayer55 Жыл бұрын
Uhhh yeah that's the idea of selling a product, to make money...
@mattdavis822 Жыл бұрын
The world needs a cross ram you can see your reflection in
@mikecrystalrobert78982 жыл бұрын
Almost 7milliom subscribers 👍
@dylanzrim36352 жыл бұрын
Power difference is worth it if I don’t need to cut holes in my hood
@joshup12752 жыл бұрын
I like both but I'll have to take the cross high ram
@joshup12752 жыл бұрын
@TELEGRAM ME MotorTrend_channel cool
@444mrjimmy2 жыл бұрын
when can we watch in australia again?
@DavidB7474 Жыл бұрын
Ok now test the SY1 or Edelbrock SY1 Smokey Ram, built by Edelbrock and Smokey Yunick, use the correct 830 Holley also. Maybe test them on a 302 with some real rpm, leave the stump puller ,383, low rpm engines outta this. I want to see them at 7500 rpms Victor jr Z28 dual 4 barrel cross ram SY1 Some serious lift and serious rpm. The dual 4 cross ram and the sy 1 were built for high rpm operation. I run an sy1 with the correct 830 Holley, on a nice little 350, .480 lift flat tappet hydraulic cam, ported 882 heads, and more than 6500 flat out, it pulls to 7000. That intake pulls from take off to when ever I let out of it. I know numbers don’t lie, but the seat of the pant meter is all smiles!! I’ve got a brand new victor jr I’ve been told would make more power.
@thehoule702 жыл бұрын
Good vid
@jeffrykopis5468 Жыл бұрын
The R&D at Offenhauser stopped devades ago. Now theyre merely a retro nostagia brand, selling obsolete parts designed in the 60s and 70s.
@jaysguyrage9483 Жыл бұрын
I had an STR 10 for years but never ran it. I wish I would have