Virus vs. Mask - Size Comparison 3D (Cloth and Surgical Mask)

[@whatyoudo9773]

in other words....you have been lied too.

[@donreed]

S/be "You have been lied TO, as well." The word "too" is a disaster waiting to happen, if "been" is accidentally omitted.

[@raymondglad5593]

Look up Koch's postulate and its application to viruses. Masks is just a little white lie.

[@whatyoudo9773]

@@donreed holy smokes...college over-educated? Cant understand your point

[@support2587]

so if CDC says stay home while coughing and sneezing and everyone is getting the jab why the fear of the unmasked ?

[@88997799]

The movie Outbreak shows full completely sealed suits with air supply. The masks don’t do a god damn thing to stop this.

[@djuniverse]

Right! If masks made any difference against deadly viruses, imagine the money we’d save on Bio-Level 4 containment! Why people can’t see the obvious is maddening.

[@funkybuddhaInit]

The point of the masks is to stop the infected from expelling the virus via moisture. The masks are highly effective.

[@BringDHouseDown]

@@funkybuddhaInit moisture, I see, so I guess we have to wear full body suits cause...guess where else moisture comes out of....the full body

[@raymondglad5593]

@@funkybuddhaInit That's even worse. the moisture evaporates from the mask and make even smaller droplets. Man I wish I was as clever as you!

[@dr560]

@@funkybuddhaInit IF the vax and/or the masks worked, you wouldn't need to worry about the "infected". Besides, the vaxed spread the virus just as quickly as the unvaxed!

[@djuniverse]

Speed up the video, make clear the end scenes with fiber scales, and show the size of a bacteria, for comparison. That will make a bigger impact. Still, well done.

[@danmar007]

Excellent suggestions. I would add make the text easier to read.

[@messier8888]

A bacterium is about 20 times bigger than the influenza virus

[@cut--]

Cracked me up last winter when someone filmed a group of people all wearing masks at a bus stop - somewhere up north. You could see the steam from their breath wafting all over each other. Fauchi said the virus is spread though moisturized air from people exhaling. Oh well.

[@ScienceSupersedesFaith]

There is a difference between droplets which carry the viruses and gaseous water (aka vapor) that condenses outside the mask. The droplets are held back quite effectively, the water vapor passes the mask. But since vapor does not carry viruses, there is no problem.

[@raymondglad5593]

@@ScienceSupersedesFaith Really? Does people look that stupid to you? You have a study to back up this stupidity?

[@ScienceSupersedesFaith]

@@raymondglad5593A wise man's advice should always suffice! Common sense, basic science and the opinion of renowned experts are really all you need. Sure, you can also read posts of random conspiracy guys on the internet and build your opinion based on their bullshit....

[@raymondglad5593]

@@ScienceSupersedesFaith Then you should use your common sense and just go back to the science you learn at school. HOW DID YOU GET YOUR FACTS? Where is the scientific study that proves your theory? Has a virus been isolated so it can be studied in air, or a mask or in a water droplet? All you showing is your ignorance of what you know yourself. You think no expert has ever lied? You can't tell because you ignorant in science and in psychology.

[@ScienceSupersedesFaith]

@@raymondglad5593 Well... my opinion on this matter is mainstream and considered to be common knowledge. Also everything I wrote is backed up by basic science. The burden of the proof has to be born by those who have a different opinion. So I can totally relax and stick with what is widely believed until someone comes up with convincing evidence for his or her minority view. And yes: Experts can be wrong (but they hardly lie on purpose). However, they are still experts and have much more knowledge in their field than the average guy. So if I have to choose between an expert and some random guy on the internet... well... there should be no question about whom to follow.

[@hanfill1]

Good video, but hard to read the subtitle.

[@bus-fun-addict]

Good idea and looks like it was a lot of work. Unfortunately i have no idea whst the colored things represent becsuse its impossible to read the labels beneath.

[@DeathValleyDazed]

Agreed because the labels can’t be read due to their angles and yellow color. Fail on this one.

[@messier8888]

if they can be read

[@TheBuddyLama]

Good effort, but microorganism text is too obscured to read due to the size, color, angle & shadows.

[@geneallen5294]

I couldn't read it either

[@kimberlyspurgeon9092]

I could read it, but I do wish the font had been larger.

[@whaikuratuhaka7029]

The viruses are that small I can't even read it's name

[@Anna-jy6tq]

Cant read any of this

[@biancagozubuyuk7062]

U the best

[@939Aed]

Great animation--although--while the dry virus particles can theoretically go right through, they are floating in water droplets when exhaled, coughed, or sneezed out.

[@939Aed]

@Ted B Yes, although the mask does deflect the longer projectiles from a cough or sneeze to the side.

[@gabekontros243]

@Ted B The vapor is caused by water in the air condensing around the hot air you breathe out, the water is not coming from your mouth as it's already in the air.

[@danawilkes6174]

@@gabekontros243 When it leaves your mouth and condenses. The surrounding air, if cool enough will make the moisture leaving your mouth visible...

[@loveisthelaw20042004]

Great so these masks obviously can’t work 🥰

[@raymondglad5593]

@@939Aed Wonderful it means it is sprayed in all directions.

[@mmganesh6087]

where is the source of the sizes of corona virus? i read elsewhere it was 1 micron or less or 2 to 5 microns.. here in this video , it says 60 or 70 microns... also , what are the sizes of the pores in the mask?

[@yeomantrader9505]

So masks are useless. It might also help to mention that the human hair is 80,000-100,000 nanometers. It's irresponsible to still be wearing masks.

[@biancagozubuyuk7062]

Amazing

[@freekingawwsome]

Gee could you possibly write smaller descriptions s ok

[@AnishPrakashBrollno]

80

[@AnishPrakashBrollno]

120

[@melvinlaquindanum1747]

the problem with your presentation with surgical mask presentation is that could give a wrong impression that it can really filter, as you done it on 1D model, when it suppose to be a least in 2D. you did not show the cross section. as you also have to show the distance between the 3 layers which presented in 3 layers of gray, which have more distance in between.

[@raymondglad5593]

Ok lets think common sense. You can see the fibres of a mask under a normal microscope. You need an electron microscope to see a virus. In this animation the virus is bigger than the size of the fibre. I'm afraid the virus can get thru a mask much easier than its portrayed.

[@meljohnpipocomparisonsandm2082]

Universe ua: im forgot a zikavirus

[@michaelcirelli3119]

A

[@AnimatedStuff]

B

[@jakeball8858]

Lol

[@ScienceSupersedesFaith]

To all buttheads: Yes, viruses are smaller than pores in a mask. But no, that does not mean that masks are pointless, because viruses do not travel on their own, but they come in water droplets which you exhale. And these droplets are way bigger than the pores and they are held back quite significantly, thus reducing the amout of viruses being spread. Edit: And to preempt an often heard argument: Water droplets are not the same as water vapor, which passes through the mask and which you might see condensing outside. Vapor does not carry viruses, because vapor consists of water molecules which are way smaller than any virus.

[@ScienceSupersedesFaith]

@ As I said: Not the virus on its own is airborne, the water droplets with the virus are!

[@jamesconnors8095]

Current studies realize you are incorrect that they essentially are useless

[@dianehebert4470]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@maryroselogo1307]

Always be face mask

[@shin-ishikiri-no]

lol

[@AnishPrakashBrollno]

70