The stereophonic effect of the two choirs, beautiful. Man, I got really emotional to the chain of suspensions 7-6 at 05:44 - 06:00
@Ллаула9 ай бұрын
Великолепно!! 👍👍👍👍🎀🎀👏👏👏🎈🎈🙏🌟💐🌷 Вивальди!!!
@vincenzotondolo24824 жыл бұрын
Grandissimo il nostro Vivaldi, orgoglio del passato musicale italiano.
@tecnomusicevo4 жыл бұрын
metallaro anni 600
@francobonanni3499 Жыл бұрын
I will never be tired to say how beautiful is the music of Vivaldi...a Master of harmony counterpoint and high creativity....please publish.
@weiliu362310 ай бұрын
❤
@will80265 жыл бұрын
Maybe my favorite sacred Vivaldi piece and a thrill to see the manuscript. Thanks so much.The performance has some very memorable moments.
@Mercer10124 жыл бұрын
That final fugue is wonderful. I was told by someone that Vivaldi was a weak fugal writer, but I do not see that at all here.
@anthonypuccetti87794 жыл бұрын
People have said that because Vivaldi didn't write fugues as developed as those of Bach or Handel, and also because he adapted a fugue in an older strict style from another composer for his two settings of the Gloria. Vivaldi apparently did not feel comfortable in the older strict manner of polyphony. But Vivaldi certainly wrote great fugues. One of them is in his D minor concerto from opus 3. Bach admired it and copied it out for organ.
@Nooticus3 жыл бұрын
In terms of pure beauty and excitement, I personally believe it is one of the best fugues ever written!
@stellario823 жыл бұрын
Because it is not a fugue, it is a "basso ostinato" built over the theme of a "ciaccona". Vivaldi is a fluid counterpointist, surely he is not Bach...
@Mercer10123 жыл бұрын
@@stellario82 Yes, I am well aware it is a chaconne-esque bassline, but it is still fugal in nature, and Michael Talbot the musicologist and Vivaldi biographer/cataloger refers to it as a fugue as well. Italian "fugues" aren't always as distinct and pedagogical as German ones, see Corelli and his many fugues in his works as an example. Further, I will provide a quote from a review of Vivaldi's Rv. 594 by Michael Talbot: "The eight-bar fugue subject, which begins with the ‘germinal motive’, is identical in shape to the opening of the bass in Bach’s ‘Goldberg’ Variations. In fact, this was a popular chaconne bass of the time. The fugal treatment, which causes the ‘bass’ often to migrate to the upper voices, heightens the sense of monumentality and provides a thrilling climax." And another by musicologist Paul Everett: "Even though there exists two equally fine settings by Vivaldi of this well-worn psalm text, this one will always remain his ‘great’ Dixit Dominus. Great in every sense: in scale; in fullness of scoring (two cori are employed); in the virtuosity it demands; in complexity of counterpoint (best displayed in the final fugue on a chaconne bass); in grandeur of conception."
@stellario823 жыл бұрын
@@Mercer1012 I mostly agree. So let's call it a "fugal passage". A Fugue would entail a countersubject and in the Italian music could be something as complicated as Bach would have it in mind (see Legrenzi or Marcello). In general, attention to Talbot: quantity is not quality. He wrote a lot on Vivaldi, not all that he wrote stands a quality test though...
@Вера-т8н3 ай бұрын
Потрясающе! Великолепно! Мощно!
@misaelgalleguillos76235 жыл бұрын
Fantástic channel!! We needed this! Thanks @DelVivaldi
@christianwouters67642 жыл бұрын
Vivaldi's music is more "human' than Bach's
@TheOneAndOnlyZelenkaGuru Жыл бұрын
"Italian"....
@udatorbas Жыл бұрын
8:33 Tecum principium (contralto) 19:35 De torrente (soprano)
@BR-yc2lf6 ай бұрын
My favorite parts ngl
@jameshenshall15343 жыл бұрын
Magnificent.
@Вера-т8н3 ай бұрын
Благодарю!!!
@edgardodelisi8634 Жыл бұрын
Grandioso!
@Freawulf5 жыл бұрын
Another quality upload, thank you!!
@Mohammed_Angler5 жыл бұрын
Another masterwork, thank you
@user-ol1ib1ss2b2 жыл бұрын
The final movement is profound music
@johntriplett44702 жыл бұрын
That passage is my favorite of all Vivaldi’s work. A bit fast here; a lot of the internal polyphony is obscured.
@serenissimus1678 Жыл бұрын
Not only the final movement, I think.
@123cityperson9 ай бұрын
am i the only one who noticed that the final movement is the same with the one in the goldberg variations?
@vibhavperi9834 ай бұрын
ME TOO.
@capezyo Жыл бұрын
Top, thanks...
@OCAMCCАй бұрын
❤❤❤❤
@mrJohnDesiderio3 жыл бұрын
Handel stole that final fugal part for his concerto grosso a due core.
@matiasvanderdys3783 Жыл бұрын
What concerto? I would like to hear it
@barroco05 Жыл бұрын
The 'stoling' was common in Baroque period. It was not illegal.
@toekabuizer677611 ай бұрын
7:55
@BR-yc2lf4 жыл бұрын
I hear someone coughing
@simonecosta44474 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/l3y1kpeLYtNkZpY
@pensare24 Жыл бұрын
😢...purtroppo, la Riproduzione o la Registrazione: pessima !!!
@opus4rv3 жыл бұрын
I absolutely love Vivaldi's music but the Dixit Dominus crown belongs to Handel. HWV 232 stands above the rest. Amazing piece of work!
@DelVivaldi3 жыл бұрын
Agreed.
@TheOneAndOnlyZelenkaGuru Жыл бұрын
Don't forget Zelenka (in particular Z. 68 in D#), whose word-painting is superior to the slightly superfluous and over virtuosic setting of Handel, no offence.
@weiliu362310 ай бұрын
Handel is boring and overrated.
@lucadeieso48159 ай бұрын
@@weiliu3623 Handel wrote his setting in 1707, at 22!, before the "stile concertante" of Vivaldi influenced every major composers in Europe: from 1710 Heinichen, from 1713 Bach. Try to find another baroque composer that at 22 can compose something like this (only Bach's actus tragicus comes close to being as impressive: early signs of two real genius in the making). Try to find something as dramatic, virtuosic and full of counterpoint.. Just for comparison and to put things into the right perspective: Zelenka first mass is from 1711, when he was 32, not 22
@weiliu36239 ай бұрын
@@lucadeieso4815 Handel had some talent here and there but he is a master of none. You get bored to most of his music after one listen. I place him behind Vivaldi, Bach, D. Scarlatti, and even Telemann.