VLAN processing in New bridge implementation

[@ivansavitsky449]

24:11 - That's why I spent the whole afternoon and still unable to configure the mgmt via bridge VLAN. They made it extremely intricate. But thanks for uncovering the right way to do it.

[@MikeHammett]

I didn't find slave\master to be that big of a deal. VLANs on a switch chip, however, are a pain in the ass.

[@ЮрийКошкин-к7л]

4:44 i have this command on CCR1009-7G-1C-1S+, but CCR1009-7G-1C-1S+ doesn't have switch chip..

[@MissCat-z2t]

so do you have a presentation on troubleshooting the network loop that cause the datacenter disconnect your friends network?

[@georgekaloudis170]

Excellent presentation.!

[@johnspiteri4205]

Is it possible to have the presentation please?

[@MikeHammett]

They are nearly always available on the web site.

[@dariohimo]

la presentación donde se puede bajar.

[@lisovik]

I still not get it where is /interface bridge vlan add bridge=B1 tagget=B1,sfp16 vlan-ids=77 ? Only this line make sense to me under /interface bridge vlan

[@edmilsonbtu]

I will love to have this PDF

[@dariohimo]

la presentación no se ven las imágenes de la presentación asi coloque un monitor de 36"

[@erwinsamayoa4633]

sube la resolucion de video en la configuracion de youtube :)

[@kwinzman]

I have never seen a vendor that makes VLAN configuration this unnecessarily complicated. 👎 MikroTik

[@deafeningmrm]

so much yes. trying to wrap my head around routeros at the moment, but after cisco, hp, ubnt and pfsense, this is by far the most complicated configuration in about every way, not only vlans :D but it‘s cheap and does a great job performance wise...

[@likeliangelo]

I hate them! All my network colleagues hate them. We only use them because they r cheap and small. But their devices are ABSOLUTE PAIN IN THE ASS.

[@virbricky]

@@deafeningmrm so basically the hardwares cheap, and then the consulting cost to configure them far exceeds the cost of another vendor.... hah

[@albertjoseph9684]

complexity must be behind the scene thing, Mikrotik should provide easier interface to users and handle all this setting behind those easy commands.

[@georgekaskader]

Yeah Andis, Vlans sometimes pretends to work properly. This new configuration is bullshit, in old software on CRS 1x series it was possible to make hardware VLAN tagging and untagging on many Switch groups. Now in new bridge mode it's not possible even on 1 switch group because you need to enable vlan filtering on bridge which CRS 1x series doesn't support with HW-OFFLOAD. Good Job Mikrotik. BTW. on CRS3x series IGMP SNOOPING works unproperly as well, the video from our providers just stops after couple minutes and there are vide issues. What's funny, when you get vlan with IPTV on another bridge which of course doesn't support HW-OFFLOADING and whole TV is going through CPU, everything is just fine, video doesn't stop, there are no issues.