W. V. Quine on Necessary Truth (1963)

  Рет қаралды 7,301

Philosophy Overdose

Philosophy Overdose

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 15
@Reviving_Virtue
@Reviving_Virtue Жыл бұрын
This is fantastic, gave it two listens. I see Quine's naturalized epistemology here acting as an epistemic ritual that adds depth and richness to Hume's empiricism. While Hume saw regularities in nature as mere habits and refrained from calling them 'necessities,' Quine is taking this a step further through emphasizing the importance of theoretical frameworks in giving meaning and coherence to these observed regularities. This integrated approach bridging theory with action and observation and reflection, serves to organize our empirical observations into a more coherent system, a point that Quine stresses towards the end of his lecture and reminds me of John Dewey's whole argument in Human Nature and Conduct.
@firstal3799
@firstal3799 11 ай бұрын
Great summary
@orpheus2883
@orpheus2883 Жыл бұрын
Quine, always welcome.
@quinetastic
@quinetastic Жыл бұрын
Great!👍 Thanks very much for posting this 😀
@GottfriedLeibnizYT
@GottfriedLeibnizYT Жыл бұрын
Uploads lately are lit🔥
@AndreyBogoslowskyNewYorkCity
@AndreyBogoslowskyNewYorkCity Жыл бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤
@Eta_Carinae__
@Eta_Carinae__ Жыл бұрын
It almost feels as though Quine treats terms like solubility as free variables to stand in for an object as yet unknown to science, where most other people see it as denoting a percept, or property defined wholly in terms of empirical content. I hope this reading is accurate; it sounds very Quinean to me. Though now it seems a mystery how Quine thinks about terms whose referent is explicitly a percept.
@alexbuckley4378
@alexbuckley4378 9 ай бұрын
Yes! This is why I like Quine!
@Eta_Carinae__
@Eta_Carinae__ Жыл бұрын
It might be more a violation of logical necessity to modify momentum's conservation under inelastic conditions, than any specific formula for it.
@BitterDawn
@BitterDawn Жыл бұрын
5 minutes in 😴🥱
@johnurga275
@johnurga275 Жыл бұрын
it's not clear to me why you would want any 'promissory note' interpretation of 'necessarily,' if it is all ultimately a matter of humean observed generalities. at some point, for whatever reason, people began searching for scientific explanations. but to say that some sort of further explanation is what they always had in mind when they said 'necessarily' ,seems a stretch.
@ukidding
@ukidding Жыл бұрын
I like his beret, very French.
@timtaylor8406
@timtaylor8406 11 ай бұрын
Is this video necessarily necessary?
@kvaka009
@kvaka009 9 ай бұрын
It is. I promise you.
Nelson Goodman on Simplicity & Truth in Science (1963)
6:24
Philosophy Overdose
Рет қаралды 2,8 М.
Quine on Carnap on Logical Truth
46:37
Daniel Bonevac
Рет қаралды 11 М.
coco在求救? #小丑 #天使 #shorts
00:29
好人小丑
Рет қаралды 120 МЛН
We Attempted The Impossible 😱
00:54
Topper Guild
Рет қаралды 56 МЛН
Dr. Jordan Peterson: How to Best Guide Your Life Decisions & Path
3:51:11
Andrew Huberman
Рет қаралды 1,6 МЛН
Karl Marx - From Socrates to Sartre (1979)
1:52:42
Philosophy Overdose
Рет қаралды 60 М.
Quine on What There Is
48:05
Daniel Bonevac
Рет қаралды 34 М.
Partially Examined Life #294: Quine on Science vs. Epistemology (Part One)
48:13
The Partially Examined Life
Рет қаралды 969
In Conversation with W.V. Quine - The Boolos Panel
1:57:42
flame0430
Рет қаралды 39 М.
Philosophy and Politics with Bryan Magee (1977)
44:09
Manufacturing Intellect
Рет қаралды 71 М.
Willard V. O. Quine - Two Dogmas of Empiricism
57:53
Victor Gijsbers
Рет қаралды 17 М.
Utility & Acceptance of Hypotheses - Isaac Levi (1963)
27:52
Philosophy Overdose
Рет қаралды 1,6 М.
coco在求救? #小丑 #天使 #shorts
00:29
好人小丑
Рет қаралды 120 МЛН