In my opinion you shouldn't be reading anything in Latin. Just please read in English. No one cares that he was smart enough to know Latin. It makes your reading sound pretentious. PS, you're not good at the pronunciation anyway so please stop.

Super!

Why do leftists think they can run the world well when all available evidence is to the contrary?

They call him professor pasmore because he don’t pass the zaza

The truth is not always pleasant or easy.

Truth is Relative

The UNTENIBILLNESS of OPTIMISM. Felt that all my life. Now in my old age it screams it's truthfulness.

Why does he look like zuckerberg?😅😅😅

There is no T in Spinoza

Yeah life is just great. Would like to know who put me here without asking my permission.

french ppl really suc ks translating everything cmon make efforts

To understand Wittgenstein? It's easy.

Dennett and Rorty are both members of the same team. I don’t think think show host knew that. He seemed disappointed at the lack of built in controversy.

-What is the Socratic method? -It is a method. -And what is a method? It is a system. - And what is a system? ... it never ends!!

Excellent again, again 👏

Great video on a Great Thinker. Thanks. {2024-04-29}

Love the series. Great thinkers, Bryan Magee great interviewer. Thanks for the uploads. G.M Hare is perhaps the most unremarkable of philosophers I've seen on this series. He advocates for teaching his children to not perform sexual acts outside of wedlock based on some 'intuition' he has. and then goes ahead and says all morals should be universal? as if in any case we should never perform sexual acts out of wedlock. This intuition from a christian dogma.. i find it simultaneously hilarious, and disgraceful.

I'm sure she understood the difference between a pure democracy and a democratic republic, which is what the United States is. She should have defined the word as Plato used it. So no, his discussion of democracies doesn't phase me much, but it was unexpected.

The ball bouncing has multiple causes. It's inherent property, gravity, a person dropping it if that is the case. I'm not sure i get the point here. Don't we know that these are a few of the causes that the bouncy ball being dropped bounces? So the child doesn't know and is surprised by lack if experience. The adult isn't. So what? Should i be surprised that a bycicle rides most of the time if i ride it and that one of the causes is its properties and myself. Why is this important?

It’s a pity that people like him are so few and far between these days, especially among my generation.

Sheldon Cooper

But why did you think you had rabbits in the garden in the first place? Burrows? Droppings? Teeth marks on the carrots? You can’t then try to make room for the hiddenness of God or the hiddenness of a complexity. We’re right back to Sagan’s invisible dragon. My wife will ask why I didn’t mow the front lawn, and I will say I might have hit the rabbit. She will say there’s no rabbit there. And then I will say, well, you can’t rule it out.

Professor Dworkin is widely celebrated Exponent of modern Natural School of Jurisprudence

Very sad. God exist and he created man !

S'il vous plaît des sous titres en français pour les discours de Chomsky !

Hegel and Marx in 45 minutes. What a dog's breakfast

39:00 perfect market=perfect utilitarianism

20:53 I just don’t see the problem…. The mind is influenced by everything around it, everyone has different mental formations due to their own experiences. I don’t think it’s right to say that two different people can experience the same mental state because everything is unique and always changing

I still don't understand what "i am a unity" means.

It's interesting that this discussion was recorded at a moment when the Soviet Union was about to begin its death spiral. Marxism is a rich philosophy for sure but Stalin once admitted that it has the disadvantage of being a complicated theory that is difficult for ordinary people to grasp. He said this was an advantage for nationalist & fascist movements.

The effort to understand all of what we call life or existence, from the perspective of observation, is limited by the aperture of one's awareness as such. What gets in the way of reasoning out an ultimate understanding of all form or objective reality is the filters created by conditioning. Our identities are almost entirely enmeshed with programming and create a false sense of self which is based on illusion. Only through introspection can it be "seen" or "known" that who it is one actually sees from is nobody seeing from nowhere seeing and knowing everything it experiences as phenomenal. There is only one, as it has been stated. But paradoxically, it is unknowable. Since all issues forth and resolves from this all-ess of one, ultimately there is nothing to be know apart from it. So, how is this useful, one might ask? Since the many comprise the all, yet are not as they appear, what cause for worry should exist in the infinite realms of experiencing, unless by being ignorant, thus suffering endlessly until such time comes for remembering. The conduit of introspection whereby one seeks to know one's self as the witness of everything, not just physical reality but thoughts, feelings or anything observable, exists only from the point of view within that self. As this one who claims existence, this I who can observe all objectivity looks to find itself as a subject, only ever will such discovery reveal the subject as an object in the awareness of a self that is not knowable yet knows all as itself. And you are that. So relax and enjoy your otherwise miserable little lives and quit fighting over everything. There's plenty of nothing for everyone.

Kinda nitpicking here but wasn’t there only one Borgia Pope?

25:05 -

Can a newborn think I am alive and I want to keep on living

RIP

Seattle is a nondualist

Everything is not 2

Chomsky said if this debate that he couldn't find any common intellectual ground with Foucault.

Vaya pollazo os ha metido el video del hombrecillo.

i have been educated

Dworkin has inspired me to continue studying philosophy at university once i get my JD. He truly got the best of the both worlds of law and philosophy.

I find Aristotle's ideas in ethics most appealing and relevant in shaping the world we live in today.

Really really enjoyed this. None of this ever came up in my civics class at university.

I have barely heard of the name Kant, let alone learning about and from him. Thus I was constantly using the [The blind men and the elephant] story to refer to the fact that we cannot know what we are not equipped to know .. Why is this not brought up in this long discussion .. Was there something in this fable not consistent with Kant's thoughts ?

Difficult

That’s crazy that Popper called natural selection metaphysics lol

Extraordinary interview. 👍🔝🌌

I'm sometimes reminded of the Laurel and Hardy film "Chumps at Oxford" ,in which a blow on the head returns Stan to his real persona of the brilliantly donnish Lord Paddington,. At one point, Lord Paddington receives a note from Albert Einstein, asking to have his own theory of relativity explained back to him, as it has gotten Einstein himself confused.

At 84 years of age, Searle (now 91) had his Professor Emeritus title revoked by University of California due to sexual harassment. Smart people can do stupid things.

the woman has not heard about systems theory - how strange! Open vs closed systems, complicated vs complex, reactive vs creative