Do These Speakers Sound as Good As They Look?

[@crashfirekeebs2820]

Wish you did the sound test without the Sundown sub. It’s misleading as far as bass goes.

[@IzziedeD]

thought this too, then noticed the amp was different as well. and the mids had no reinforcement, either. so it wasnt really apples to apples. the 6.5's bass should have been able to stand on its own, but in the end i think the last demo wasn't supposed to be a comparison play. more like 'here's a decent system you could do with these four parts'

[@DesertRunner602]

I agree

[@Jduc750]

It’s youtube. the speakers only sound as good as the device your viewing the video on………..

[@brians1793]

@@Jduc750 True, but it still helps to hear how speakers sound in a room and from different angles, certain differences still comes across in comparisons.

[@adamfranks4118]

I would have preferred to listen without the sub hooked up. That being my only issue, thank you very much for playing these. I have been considering the 3 way set for my next build.

[@raymo6795]

...consider Eton, Micro Precision or German Maestro...you do not need to buy Chinese speakers

[@JacesOwnWorld]

Zero reason to play upgraded speakers without a sub.

[@andriesgeddes4692]

​@@JacesOwnWorldI think it would be important to play the speakers on their own especially if you are trying to demo them...

[@chichidouglas5078]

You're not listening to his subwoofer or those speakers so it doesn't matter

[@chichidouglas5078]

​@@andriesgeddes4692It has zero importance because you're not listening to those speakers

[@StockA4]

I’m just here for emotional support.

[@wal2]

I be needing that like all da time, so it is much appreciated!

[@Bighotwheelhunter]

Emotional damage

[@pedroveliz4131]

Hang in there We’re important in ways known and unknown! God bless y’all!

[@freeair7292]

​@@Bighotwheelhunter😂

[@bsw051]

I dig it

[@SteadySteve1024]

Sounds pretty good to me. Actually made me dig out my old MB Quart Crossovers and I'm old school too. I keep all the old boxes and everything so I can store them and not have to worry.

[@melvinartis1918]

I used to have realistic horn tweeters in the '80's that were inexpensive but loud and very clear. I hate that I sold them and unfortunately could not buy any more of them 😒 The sound quality was incredible. At that time they were about $8.00 a piece. Straight from Radio Shack.

[@grumpysteelman]

Parts Express has inexpensive stuff like that, and most of the reviews are from true enthusiasts. I’ve gotten a dose of nostalgia building cheap setups that sound awesome.

[@blarggggg]

The common, inexpensive horn tweeters of the 1980s-ish were generally products sold by Motorola, and later by CTS. Used in all kinds of stuff, with different lenses for different applications, for decades -- although usually only systems that were intended to be able to play very loudly. They're unique in that they are examples of "good" piezos. Interesting little buggers that can sound quite nice if properly used, with broadly interchangeable components between models. They ultimately got driven out of the market by stupid-cheap clones that mostly just kind of suck.

[@KCG-dq8gk]

After this piramid

[@stevenmartinez8063]

You shouldn't have added the sub on the last set of speakers. I wanted to hear those by themselves.

[@SDS-1]

There is no need for a sub playing when demoing speakers. Just demo the speakers you are demonstrating 😉

[@marcusstanley9317]

I have on headphones and didn't hear any subwoofer and my headphones are very bass heavy because I listen to a lot of rebassed and bass boosted music!

[@SDS-1]

@@marcusstanley9317 not only can you hear it. You can SEE the sub moving.

[@marcusstanley9317]

I made that comment before it had got to the copon

[@marcusstanley9317]

Got to the 3way set and I saw the sub moving, my fault man!

[@SDS-1]

@@marcusstanley9317 all good sir😊

[@nunyabisness4300]

Man. Those late 90’s German MB Quart components with the soft aluminum cones were the absolute best sounding car audio speakers EVER. $500ish dollars IIRC. The crossovers required an amp rack they were so big.

[@HighVybeTribe]

They were very clean sounding . But I liked the smoothness of the soft dome teeets of Boston Pro lf , Rockford , and Sony - all from back in the day 💪😎👍

[@chris_vandepeer]

I think i have a pair of MB Quart crossovers the ones with the clear top on them i think they are black and red.

[@lunchboxbailey]

Those German MB Quart speakers are surprisingly still available from German Maestro, the original build house. Had to help a buddy track down some replacements a few years ago, very nice people to deal with.

[@kd7cwg]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/bobEpJVre6isj7s I kick myself for leaving these in the car when I sold it.

[@jerk5828]

Yes they were clean and loud

[@glenklimek1662]

Used to love the old JBL Titanium Tweeters back in the day. But I would say soft dome is probably best for most applications.

[@wadebuck69]

The 3 way components look pretty good and compared to some other brands the price isn't too outrageous but for my money you cannot beat CT Sounds Meso 3 way components. I caught them on sale for $199.99 and bought 2 sets they are hands down the best sounding speaker system I have ever owned. I have them powered by a CT Sounds 150.4 amp and a set of NVX VSP4 and DS-18 mid bass for rear fill ran off of another CT Sounds 150.4 amp along with some NVX VCW124 subs on an NVX 2700.1 amp subs are ran through an Audiocontrol Epicenter then everything goes through Audiocontrol DM-608 and I can be going 90 mph on the interstate with windows down in my truck and can hear the music perfectly as can anyone driving close to me. I have it all packed into a 1997 Chevrolet Silverado K1500 extended cab. It took a lot of fiberglass work and fabrication to keep the stock look. I made kick panel pods and fiberglassed my door panels. I made a custom 2 1/2" rear seat lift kit to make room to fit a custom fiberglass sub box under the seat. The 4" speakers in the rear went into the spot that held the stock 4×6 speakers and I made fiberglass enclosure to hold DS-18 mid bass speakers and reshaped the rear side panels with fiberglass to blend those enclosures into the side arm rest areas on both sides. It kept me from losing my mind during the covid lockdown.

[@Dougie085]

Idk I had one of the CT Sounds Meso 2 way sets and they were just so/so to me. They sounded alright but not great. Glad you're happy with yours though. It's hard to buy these online only company speakers because you just never know what they sound like.

[@greglancaster9053]

I grew up with Polk soft dome silk tweeters, so that has always influenced my listening preferences. I had some Boston Acoustic dome tweeters back in the day, wish I had never sold those gems. Great vid, Big D!

[@julesbruchez-theartofgrapp9646]

Yes those are some serious SQ speakers I can’t find any like those anymore. Need a 3 ways

[@Assimilator702]

@@julesbruchez-theartofgrapp9646Focal, Seas, Scanspeak, Hertz, Audison, German Maestro, Hybrid Audio. There are still plenty of high quality speakers available for the car audio segment.

[@stevefox3763]

I completely agree the Silk Dome are the best sounding, I miss them so much but I was killing them at a rate of a pair every 3 months and it was getting too expensive so I now run 3 inch compression drivers which sound so harsh but seriously loud and are rated for 100w rms and its been 3 years so far without a failure. My rear components have silk dome and have survived 2 years so far, they are kicker and i might see about buying just the tweeters and seeing if those will survive in the front :)

[@kiklop8362]

If it sounds harsh get DSP

[@sethgt1234]

I am running a JP 10.4 on my highs and mids. I am still running the factory tweeters until I figure out where I am going to put my Crescendo tweeters. I can't believe I have not hurt the factory tweeters at all. And they are from 2006. I am waiting for the day that they just stop working. That would probably be a good thing, because that would push me to put in my Crescendo tweeters. 🤷🏽‍♂️

[@stevefox3763]

@@kiklop8362 a do won't fix anything, the nature of compression drivers means they will always sound harsh compared to silk dome.

[@kiklop8362]

@@stevefox3763 that is not true. This is how Focal get this harsh scar...

[@RennieAsh]

How do you blow up tweeters when they are 50cm from your ears lol

[@HifiVega]

The 3 way set looks pretty interesting

[@91CavGT5]

I agree!

[@jamesmoore7049]

They definitely shine with music but wish we could've heard them play with some vocals also. Great work sir!

[@bbfoto7248]

Just my opinion, but all of the tweeters seemed pretty bright and "tizzy" to me. 🤷‍♂️ But I agree that it would have been good to hear some female vocals to see if there was any sibilance and how natural and lifelike (or not) they sound.

[@TheSFFV]

Those 3 ways look nice. sound good. I am curious to find out more about the story begind them and OZ. I still have a set of the OZ Matrix Elites. Superman for the win on those. I typically prefer metal domes (titanium, Aluminum) . I like the sharpness. But silks are cool too. The Ceramic ones are also nice, but hard to find someone using that material anymore.

[@damianthaxter2780]

Hey Big D. Would you be able to do these test without the subwoofer in the back ground connected?

[@anthonyberry6769]

JP is knocking it out of the park with his products! The quality vs. pricing are absolutely fantastic as well 🔥💯

[@justkiddin1980]

Yeah 399 for that speaker set is acceptable but 750?? 750 is a bit too much imho

[@bbfoto7248]

@@justkiddin1980 @Anthony Berry It would be interesting to do a direct A/B comparison between these D4S 3-ways and the *SONY Mobile ES XS-163ES* 3-ways that are On Sale right now at Crutchfield for $100 OFF. The Sony's are still $100 more, but I bet that extra $100 is well worth it for the difference in real world performance. ;)

[@Bassotronics]

@@justkiddin1980 For the price I can get PRV audio mids and tweets and be almost 3x louder and still sound good. Just sayin’.

[@julesbruchez-theartofgrapp9646]

@@bbfoto7248I would put my money on Sony. Biggest mistake people make is putting these in doors. All the speakers need thier own designated space. Small boxes with enough space to breathe and play. Plus stiff for less vibration. If installed into doors you need serious fabrication and ALOT of sound dampening

[@RennieAsh]

I'd prefer them with more subtle branding than slap it in the middle of the speaekers, though I guess that is the cheapest 20c way to add it.

[@tyhardinhomes-kellerwillia4259]

Big D, LOVE the channel content as an "old school bass head" from the 80's when the 150db mark hadn't been crossed yet & watching the Facuda/Maynard battles to get there, lol. Couldn't help but notice the sub was running in the test of the DS4 drivers. How would it affect things if it weren't running in regard to audible mid-bass driver response on it's own merit?

[@charlesreedy9330]

I would like to see how the d4s 3 ways compare to the ct sounds meso 6.5 3 way speakers

[@devonsamuelkekie]

For the price of the 400 ones make sense buy10 prv and pioneer super tweeter

[@seamonsterco7570]

Hands down, titanium. Specifically MBQ from 1998. Give me all the harshness!!!😂 For SQ silk. Specifically the Dynaudio 3 piece set. 🤤

[@tech4life884]

With you having that subwoofer in the background connected we can't get a true sound of what these speakers sound like by themselves.

[@95Sn95]

I just bought and installed a pair of RECOIL SAM65 components, it's there top line and on sale, were anyway... not only do they look sexy as hell with a perimeter cast frame around the gold motor and gold tweetet but they sound awesome. They have a -3db/0db/+3db jumper on the beautiful crossovers

[@snooketcher]

Wish the random Sundown subwoofer wasn’t playing in the background during the 3-way demo.

[@TrunkThunderLithium]

They all sound amazing compared to stock speakers just they got better as you pay more. Kinda funny how that works 🤣

[@MyBlowncobra]

The minute you cross over to the 300+ range your in morel and focal and hertz and so many other brands range..

[@ranchosdelnorte]

Using a sub during the last demo . . . surely that can't be because you're trying to make a pair of $400 speakers sound better in order to warrant their price tag 🙄

[@wal2]

No reason to waste the extra 2 channels and I figured most people would be using a sub with these.

[@th3drizzl378]

more info on the whole oz audio thing? i actually knew everyone there we sold them for years and john and greg were friends of mine.

[@wal2]

*SHOP* Check out the D4S Full Speaker Lineup here: lddy.no/1gh59 Down4Sound CFXT65 Budget 6.5" Coaxials: lddy.no/1gh5a Down4Sound JFX65 6.5" Coaxials: lddy.no/1gh5b Down4Sound JFX653s 3-Way Component Speakers: lddy.no/1gh5c Sundown Audio SA-6.5SW 6.5" Subwoofer: lddy.no/1g2y1 Other Options for 6.5" Speakers: amzn.to/43XocaB Shop Crutchfield for 6.5" Speakers: howl.me/cjWW7c72g82 *AUDIO AND VIDEO GEAR* Camera - iPhone 13pro 1TB - amzn.to/3nCjGvc RODE Wireless Go II Microphones: amzn.to/3Q6NVHl Shure MV7 Microphone: amzn.to/3A4OICK Zoom H4n Audio Recorder: amzn.to/3BXjVsS 960 LED Panel: amzn.to/2Sxoq3S *TEST BENCH EQUIPMENT* SMD / D'Amore Engineering Amp Dyno: goo.gl/sJTcf7 XS Power D1400 Batteries - amzn.to/2BPFCKW XS Power PSC60 Charger - amzn.to/2CHGcfs Fluke 1000A AC/DC Clamp Meter: amzn.to/2Rw5WDA Handheld Dyno: amzn.to/2u2EgKV My Favorite Screwdriver Kit: amzn.to/2x0VzcE *VIDEO INDEX* 0:00 Intro 0:29 Budget 6.5 CFXT65's 1:45 Installing the CFXT65's 2:10 Demo of CFXT65's 3:54 D4S JFX65 2-way Speakers 5:49 Demo of JFX65's 7:20 D4S JFX653s 3-way Speakers 10:26 Demo of JFX653s' 12:40 Final Thoughts 13:30 EXTRAs _DISCLAIMER: This video and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you purchase from one of the product links, I may receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases_

[@joshholden8561]

First pair is what I'd expect for that price the 2nd pair is great but why the uneven look of shiny aluminum? That should be black there's too many mounting holes for that to look ok for that price u can also tell the 2nd pair needs more power than u had them hooked up to the third pair looks much better with only 4 holes for mounting looks good quaility but for that price cicada and many other brands best that price and I believe the new Sony mobile es are some of the best sounding mids and highs on the market right now. Thanks for the video.

[@reganmorben9248]

"This is for you, I don't really care about getting free speakers" Yeah right... Hahaha! Whatever you say Dig D.... I'm calling bullshit on that one. Getting free audio gear sent to you to play with is a dream come true!

[@wal2]

🙄

[@lolatruck]

How do these compare to CT Sounds, Massive, Focal AS

[@rafaelmelendez6655]

Did he disconnect the top tweeters?

[@steveo5174]

The sticky material for sticking things is butyl mastic. It's used to hold the grille into the speaker ring. It's shit messy stuff. It melts on a hot summers day. I haven't seen that shit come with speakers since the 2000s.

[@bigdogbrodavepresents6178]

They call it Monkey Shit in the Navy...LOL... Butyl Rubber will outlive humanity. BDBD/2023

[@D4S-JAKE]

. JFX are pretty sweet. CFXT are the eZ upgrade. 💜 wait for hexicone 😉

[@theaudioasyulm]

...The Infinity Ribbons from the 90's were excellent, but fragile. Even with the cool tweeter protection on the crossover, customers would obliterate them regularly! A very different sound compared to domes! I have some Peerless anular rings in my car at the moment, they sound excellent!

[@mugendrewable]

This is a fail. That mid in the three way has got to be in an enclosure.

[@Tekatogokuta]

very soft review no pros cons biased almost

[@sakostwwy1903]

I have 2 favorite tweeters. I loft the soft and smooth sound of the old school 1” silk dome Kicker tweeters that were there top models in and around 95’. Then I competed using 3/4”(if I remember right ) Cliff Design tweeters. I have no idea what they were but I can’t even begin to describe how good those were. So many tweets are too dang harsh. I like smooth and silky.

[@jonesaleroy]

Silk dome here as well. I love loud music, but want silky smooth. Silk is way more forgiving at peak volume. Using some polk 6.5 2 ways right now and love them. Some of the metal domes sound amazing when they are set up properly.

[@moreaudio760]

Love the brightness of aluminum dome tweeter , much respect to you and JP for sharing these speakers for the masses ..

[@ericingram7864]

Am I the only one who thinks the cone on the 2 better drivers looks like the old Diamond Hex, I know these sure look thinner, but the pattern reminded me of them.

[@jamesbounds2208]

Are you powering the top tweeters on the bookshelf speakers? These should definitely be disabled for a good fair test

[@wal2]

No they were not used

[@nickkrug8157]

BUT YOU NEED to have like 10 /15 different ones playing and comparing at high volumes .................

[@g-style4466]

I used to have OZ Audio mids and highs set up that sounded absolutely phenomenal, I used to hate having to hide those metallic grey baskets cuz they looked so good lol. Looking at the specs on the coaxials on D4S they're identical?

[@MotionSkater]

The 3 ways look clean, wondering if I should get those or the ct sounds 3 ways

[@Oldnobrand]

Agreed with another poster the Boston pros specifically .4's in the early to mid 90s were the GOAT titanium domes with tangenital surrounds and ridges to stabilize the cone. Legendary Quart 19's also but were piercing highs.... ADS Soft domes were also a reference back in the day.

[@nicholashill1957]

Best component set I ever owned🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥extremely clear👌🏾Boston Acoustics

[@julesbruchez-theartofgrapp9646]

1. Are these considered to be SQ? 2. Realistically are these comparable in a SQ way to say JL or Infinity? Thank you

[@zod-engineering-welding]

Favorite tweeter material is Kapton. WTF? Kapton? Yes. As in, what AMT tweeters use for their ultra-thin folded diaphragm. A properly designed AMT can sound absolutely killer with it's ultra-low distortion compared to most consumer level tweeters. That is what are in my Legacy Calibre bookshelf speakers, and in a lot of Legacy Audio high-end speakers costings thousands and thousands of dollars.

[@johnofsometrades405]

I actually like how high the tweeters got.

[@gen-X-trader]

Mmm these are kind of flat. Very forward. Like you can tell going back and forth between the speaker and your voice. Talking about the lower end ones, I still don't think they take out my low-cost favorite the Alpine type s. As you move up, they get better but they still kind of have a similar tone. Just better detail and a little less obnoxious. Using your voice for a reference. 3ways def best of bunch but...dynaudio esotan 6.5 set is 329. Would bet on those winning a demo shootout between the 2. I think where these guys have something is with that $120 speaker. Not a lot of competition in that bracket

[@justkiddin1980]

I like the guy from Robot underground and he is honest about things like speakers and amplifiers.. He speaks some truths about the industry and a lot of things are way overpriced for the quality delivered.. With speakers i always try to balance between price to performance, with most of us we’re not going to the lengths that we are going to dampen the whole interior and panels of a car till perfection so we don’t need the “ultra high end” stuff.. Plus when you invest in a great headunit (chinese with optical out) and good amplifiers you can get away with somewhat cheaper speakers and if you want to upgrade in the future..

[@d.smithim8306]

Those things were rattling my tv remote on my coffee table all playing thru my bumpin cell phone speaker... wait what....? I think I confused meself......

[@audiophilecole2994]

I prefer beryllium tweeters due to the ir performance with power. They have worked great for my SQ setups but also work well with SQL if you need the extra SPL. The only issue with beryllium is definitely the cost. I have chosen home audio drivers from Paradigm and James Loudspeakers with good success.

[@narmale]

HAHAHAH they copied the M series from Maestro, the ORIGINAL german shop that built the old MB quart sets... and they are STILL making speakers!

[@LifeSized101]

I feel you only get 20 years out of tweeters had boston acoustics 6.43 's and the neo 4tTitaniums . Substituted them for hertz cento C26 (similar size) silk sound ok

[@14truelies]

Were all 3 speakers driven by an amp? I’m looking to replace my Bose speakers in my traverse. Not adding an amp. Was looking at the Skar TX65s, NVX entry 65s, or those entry d4s speakers. Not sure which would be my best bang for the buck.

[@steveschwartz9771]

2nd time watching this vid. THe 3-way have markedly better/tighter low end control. Be nice to bail the crossovers and run them active with a good DSP unit to take advantage of their apparent build quality, sounded pretty nice. Reminds me a lot of the cone material Eton used at one point.

[@notstanbutafan]

Man I absolutely love that blue acrylic specker box you have, if you ever want to part with it let me know. Love your videos. D4S has been killing it lately.

[@jeffreytopp4695]

Lol, I hope someone doesn’t mind beaming between the midrange and tweeter on that 3-way set. Not gonna look too great on an RTA. The tweeter doesn’t go low enough for that 3” cone of the midrange. Ideally, you’d want to do the midrange to tweeter crossover no higher than 2,250Hz, but can get away with 3,000Hz. Going up to 5kHz would make those mids beam like crazy. The mid-bass to midrange should also be a lot lower than 750Hz, but the woofer won’t be beaming too badly there. 315Hz between mid-bass and midrange and then 2.25kHz would be best for midrange to tweeter, but it doesn’t sound like those are capable of that. Definitely an SPL-oriented 3-way set instead of an SQ set as they look to be marketed. As for tweeter material, I do agree that a silk dome sounds the best and most natural. Most hard dome tweeters are just too harsh.

[@mr.18s73]

Reminds me of the old school Audiobahn carbon fiber series speakers 😊 Wich I love

[@TheWildh24]

What do you all feel is a good 3.5-4.0" car audio speaker with an overall warm tone? I'm looking to replace my speakers in a 2019 ram. Factory HK amp seems to put out enough power, but just want s smoother sound mid and high end.

[@brandoyo9689]

Silk dome for an interior speaker has been my go-to. As for anything JP sells, I won’t be buying anything else from him. The guy is nice one minute while you’re dropping $5k+ on subs, then disses you later when you try to reach out to him without spending money because you’re wasting his time. Ok JP!…. 👎

[@rapatti007]

Not the same demo when you did not use the same amp and also in the end you used sub Not a good comparision!!!

[@n.shiina8798]

i have no favourite dome material but my preference is either uncoated silk, titanium, beryllium, diamond, or ceramic. Aluminum and plastic base dome just didn't suit my taste. though, if i can fit planar or folded ribbon, i'd prefer them more than dome.

[@bradmeek]

Magnesium?

[@n.shiina8798]

@@bradmeek oh, yeah i forgot them. that one used on Focal Aria series, i think?. sounds okay if i rmb correctly

[@bbfoto7248]

​@@n.shiina8798 Mundorf AMT FTW, or BlieSMa T34B/T25B Beryillum dome tweeters.

[@z1berzerker]

Silk for sure 👍 the smoothest tweets. For demos have to go Titanium, helps to balance out heavy bass 🔊 just my thoughts 🤔 😀

[@sppb32]

Aluminum dome tweeters are not bad, you just have to use the attenuation on the crossover or install the off axis if you think they are too harsh, soft dome are much smoother and suitable for on axis mount, I'm yet to try the beryllium dome tweeters but i heard they are the best sounding ones.

[@MarvinHartmann452]

I tried them and they kinda sound like a mix if the 2. Less harsh but not like silk dome either.

[@-Gunslinger-]

I liked the JX coaxial the best. At least for my ears. I just don’t get why the music genre/type used in the VAST majority of speaker test or review videos is some version of hip hop or rap. I need to know how it sounds with the types of music I listen to……like country, rock, and metal. Stuff like that. Overall nice video though.

[@rickyjackson5160]

DOWN4SOUND PRO AUDIO 6.5" D4S-65 V2 VS Deaf Bonce Arnold 6.5 Midrange speaker sound B..

[@billsterling5790]

I lovewhen you say "Yeah Boy! And then look like a d--k when you thought the camera was off..................................

[@joshuasterling2144]

I have the Infinity Kappa Perfect components and they are a beast. The magnet will almost touch the outside door panel its so big. I have them on a five channel amp with all infinity Kappa gear.

[@GSnip3]

Honestly, I really couldn't tell the difference between any one of these speakers. I played it on my headphones. My phone even in my car speakers and everything sounded the exact same. I don't know if it was like that just from you or for anyone else

[@Highqman1974]

Speakers look great, and they seem to sound good. The logos on everything make them look cheap. Nothing against D4S at all. But imagine how great they would look in a high end custom install just plain. Like in an A Pillar install. Way better with no logos. Plus you never wanna have the logos because from some angles the speakers will look crooked. The tweeter for example will always look crooked. Would look way better with no logo. Just put it on the back....

[@Bassotronics]

I like the “Phenolic” material used on the Selenium ST-200 tweeters. But then again I’m more of an SPL guy than SQ so the silk may be more “musical”.

[@walterbkeen]

Personally i tend to gravitate toward AMT tweeters. Particularly fond of Adam Audio studio monitors, and Emotiva home speakers for this very reason. Not much going on in car audio with AMT tweeters as i suspect they are less forgiving with placement which would impact the overall imaging.

[@cup_and_cone]

Regardless of how they sound, they look like a million bucks... really knocked it out of the park.

[@rtg5p4ck02]

Can you Check out Alphasonik NMR80 Midrange Speaker they say that it has a Sensitivity: 107dB that woud be insane if its right for the price !

[@arieljones4595]

That second set looks like a set of coupled components, IMO. Whatever happened to coupled components? They seem like theyre extinct.

[@glencalhoun9544]

An audio guy that says he don't care about free speakers.... Lmao 🤣🤣🤣 we care.... We care about them all!!!

[@joseiracheta3817]

Back in the day soundstream made some awesome sounding components

[@acetechnical6574]

well, they look like some fisher price gee whiz BS crap, so my guess is no, they dont sound as "good" as they look. I also dont think anyone involved in Car "audio" would know good sound if it slapped them in the face.

[@DARKDUDE187]

Aren't you and DFS going to have a drawing and be doing give-aways on things like this? Dude if they won't help you promote yourself then you are not being respected as a creator. We know you don't need speakers but some of us could or could use the smile. Thank you for listening.

[@TacticalBuffoonary]

Scilling for JP is shameful 🙄

[@DavidBrown-wm7zx]

Why not use a car audio amplifier to test speakers? Seems like you’d want to pair them with car audio equipment and temporarily install them into a car to get a real review. Not bashing just saying. The off axis response might make them sound totally different.

[@033Fritz]

Late to the party… again! Own two sets of the three way components. I enjoy them especially for the price! If you want old MB Quart QM’s let me know!

[@muffindell]

It would be interesting to investigate why speaker manufacturers don't seem to produce products with higher efficiency so less powerful amps can easily drive them, like 89db is not really very good imho

[@johnclark3067]

Beryllium is my favorite tweeter material. Don't have it for car stereo yet. Have Focal Solo6 Be studio monitors on my XL desk at home. They are beryllium and are incredible to listen to!

[@n.shiina8798]

berylliums are great but use them with precautions. keep them intact. if you managed to break the dome, better get out and vent the room.

[@enricolisk1357]

Is the external subwoofer active in the background of the 3-way component section of the video?

[@JaredElliott1]

I watch youtube through my TV. I couldn't really tell a difference in any of them. But maybe the 3 ways...maybe they look so good they seem to sound better? I'd like to try them out.

[@xguy7577]

I personally would like to see the 6.5 woofer in the three way component to be treated as an infinite baffle dual two ohm so it would draw more of the current to produce more mid bass. And I do prefer soft dome tweets.

[@u9Nails]

Outro crew here: Silk soft dome are my favorite to listen too. I'm not one for the harsh metal dome tweets. And, horns are like cilantro to me. The flavor becomes is all horns, it's hard to appreciate the flavor of anything else.

[@billsterling5790]

EVERYTIME YOU PLAY IT i TURN OFF THE FEED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! smoke jacket ..............................AZZ

[@rackstargaming8131]

If you really don't care for free speakers you can just send me those JFX-653s my way 😂😂 cause I care a lot! 😊 (8:00)

[@tonesmith909]

Favortite tweet material: Beryllium (Focal). Second: Titanium/Aluminum

[@RyanBassForLife]

Nice I know Johnathan will come out with the D4S Subwoofers someday.

[@motorcity429]

Rockford T2s or you're just wasting your install time and money none of these budget bangers last more than a year if you give them more than 45 RMS

[@michaelkowalski2931]

Remove the extra sub for a true sound of the product you're doing a review for. You can't hear the true sound of the speakers in question.

[@billsterling5790]

Smoke jacket Blues needs to be OUTTA HERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! BigWillie, Im out

[@TheoneDragon51]

I love silk dome tweeters. However the titanium ones on my Paradigm Monitor 11 v5 home speakers I really like those too. They are the first ones I've ever liked.