Was Jesus A Real Person? | These 3 Historical Accounts Confirm Jesus' Existence

[@yasminedghill4222]

Magnificent presentation .Bravo !!

[@mr.nobodyhere]

When was the last time you did a 1Thessalonians 5:21? This channel has decieved you like it once decived me till I put Gods word ABOVE a yt video. Have You Not Heard The Only Gospel That Saves Today? Jesus already forgave ALL of your sins at the cross at Calvary according to Ephesians 1:7 kjv; 2nd Corinthians 5:19 kjv, and 1st Corinthians 15:1-4 king james. Jesus paid your sin debt in full on your behalf, and if you want to be saved and go to heaven, all you have to do is believe on what he accomplished, not anything you did. Stop asking for forgiveness of sins Jesus already forgave, stop confessing sins that Jesus already buried in the grave, and HAVE FAITH in Christs performance on the cross, and not yours. A prayer is of yourself. It cant save anyone. FAITH in Christ and him alone is required to be justified rightious in Gods eyes. You cannot get something you already have, and God cannot forgive sins he already forgave through the blood of Jesus Christs' work at Calvary. *Thats the good news. Thats the gospel of your salvation (1st Corinthians 15:1-4 kjv):* Jesus died for your sins according to the scriptures, he was buried and took them to the grave, and he resurrected three days later without them according to the scriptures. Put full trust in this and be saved right now. Or suffer eternal damnation in your unbelief in hell. Salvation is not about getting your sins forgiven, its believing they already are. Its YOUR eternity, and its YOUR choice. Grace and peace.

[@kimber4573]

I learned more from this short video on this subject than I have in my whole life. Thank you.

[@mr.nobodyhere]

When was the last time you did a 1Thessalonians 5:21? This channel has decieved you like it once decived me till I put Gods word ABOVE a yt video. Have You Not Heard The Only Gospel That Saves Today? Jesus already forgave ALL of your sins at the cross at Calvary according to Ephesians 1:7 kjv; 2nd Corinthians 5:19 kjv, and 1st Corinthians 15:1-4 king james. Jesus paid your sin debt in full on your behalf, and if you want to be saved and go to heaven, all you have to do is believe on what he accomplished, not anything you did. Stop asking for forgiveness of sins Jesus already forgave, stop confessing sins that Jesus already buried in the grave, and HAVE FAITH in Christs performance on the cross, and not yours. A prayer is of yourself. It cant save anyone. FAITH in Christ and him alone is required to be justified rightious in Gods eyes. You cannot get something you already have, and God cannot forgive sins he already forgave through the blood of Jesus Christs' work at Calvary. *Thats the good news. Thats the gospel of your salvation (1st Corinthians 15:1-4 kjv):* Jesus died for your sins according to the scriptures, he was buried and took them to the grave, and he resurrected three days later without them according to the scriptures. Put full trust in this and be saved right now. Or suffer eternal damnation in your unbelief in hell. Salvation is not about getting your sins forgiven, its believing they already are. Its YOUR eternity, and its YOUR choice. Grace and peace.

[@israeldaisi624]

@@mr.nobodyhere Romans 10:9 "That if you confess with your mouth Jesus as Lord, and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved."

[@mr.nobodyhere]

@@israeldaisi624 If you read from verse 1 of this chapter, youll learn the context. Romans 10 is mostly Paul (our Apostle) sharing his hope for Israel with Gentiles, that Israel will be saved. Jesus will return, and Israel as a JEWISH nation must understand WHO they killed, as they are still blinded because they killed thier massish (Acts 7). They must understand this so they can be " born again" and finally inherit thier EARTHLY kingdom. Paul was commissioned by the already crucified, already buried, and already RISEN Jesus from heaven (1Corinthians 15:1-4 kjv; Acts 9) to preach ONLY ONE GOSPEL to mostly GENTILES. *Grace through faith* in Christs FINISHED crosswork, and in him alone. Paul also wrote 12 other books. Including Ephesians 2:8,9. He states We are saved by grace through faith. Not of works of the flesh. Not of yourselves. Jesus already did all the work. Jesus that paid your sin debt on the cross. Jesus who took them to the grave, and rose again three days later. Jesus did all the work and he deserves ALL the credit. THATS the good news. Not you saying words. Context is very important. We learn by comparing scripture with scripture. Rightly dividing the word of truth as God prescribes. I hope this heps. Grace and peace. Learn more faster on yt channel: truthtimeradio with an open Bible.

[@shirleychen7412]

Saul later renamed Paul. Pharisee and highly trained by the order of pharisees in his day. Never broke any of the Laws and still remained faithful.

[@marcusg6904]

Saul/Paul actually did break the law before his conversion. He broke Leviticus 19 “Loving thy brother/people” he was persecuting the church/Jews/Israel. Shalom

[@Tryityoulllikeit]

It's H7856 Shaw'ool or Sha'uel in Hebrew don't take my word for it . Look it up . King Saul and Paul , same name.

[@mr.nobodyhere]

@@Tryityoulllikeit The Jews didnt need to carry a boat anchor around in order to understand the (incomplete) books of the Bible at that time. Plain english works Just like God promised His word would be FOREVER. The Bible doesnt need a dictionary. Its axiomatic. It defines itself when you study the Bible the way God intended.. "Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth." - 2 Timothy 2:15 KJV "For precept must be upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little:" - Isaiah 28:10 KJV Our apostle Paul was never a King. He was a pharacy of the pharacy. Born of the tribe of Benjamin. In acts 7, he concented to the stoning of Stephen. In acts 9, he was on his way to slaughter all who believed Jesus mosaic law covenant. Dont need a concordance, or commentary. Just trust Gods word as your final authority. I hope this helps. You only get two educations: The one you are given. And the one you give yourself. Consider truthtimeradio to learn more faster. It helps remove all the confusion. Grace and peace.

[@Tryityoulllikeit]

@King James Bible. M.O.R. In the first century they didn't speak the kings English. Jews went synagogues from birth and were taught. Acts 17.10 the brethren immediately sent Paul and Silas away by night to Berea and when they arrived they went into a synagogue of the jews . Now these were more noble minded than those in Thessalonica for they recieved the word w/ great eagerness examining the Scriptures daily to see weather these things were so. What Scriptures are they studying there in the synagogue , in the first century ? Jesus is a 500 y.o. anglicized English name. You gonna depend on that for eternity? Peace

[@shirleychen7412]

True however, when he had his personal meet with Yeshua he spent the rest of his days faithfully testifying for the kingdom truth and peoples. Thank you Marcus.😊❤

[@SIMPLYJEN7]

Imformative than school yrs

[@tjtampa214]

I have always heard of these three Who provided evidence for the historicity of Jesus. I've heard people say there are others but for some reason they only ever mention these three. Who are the others?

[@israeldaley7575]

❤

[@philipward8242]

Biblical Truths Explained beautifully Thanks Sir

[@TomorrowsWorld]

You're most welcome!

[@wulf7742]

Thx

[@AutoEngineerVideos]

You've failed to mention the translation of Josephus' works into Arabic that has been found. While it mentions Jesus (yes, Josephus specifically uses the Latin word from which we get the English "Jesus," as it was a transliteration from Hebrew/Aramaic, through Greek, to Latin, as written by Josephus), in the first mention, the Arabic translation doesn't say about being raised again, etc. It just says that there was a man with that name who still had followers at the time of writing the book. Thus, it confirms that Jesus was mentioned in the first instance (prior to the mention being embellished by an overly-enthusiastic monk who should've had his rear-end kicked for adulterating the book), rather than the whole thing being a fabrication, as nay-sayers try to assert. Also, to the sacred names people, "Jesus" is just a series of transliterations stacked on top of each other. Everyone hears the name and they know who is meant. If someone says "have you heard of Yeshuah?" people wouldn't know what the person was on about. While Yeshuah (or Joshua) is indeed correct, arguing about semantics only serves to alienate people, and it detracts from the message. Before you say "ah, but..." here are some rebuttals to your arguments: The new testament WAS NOT originally written in Aramaic. The Aramaic version was written in a dialect that didn't appear until 200 to 300 years after Jesus died, and it was NEVER in use in or around Judea, where the apostles came from. Moreover, the passage which says "my God, my God, why have you forsaken me?" after giving the Aramaic, has the Aramaic twice. It's the equivalent of the English version being "'my God, my God, why have you forsaken me?' That is, 'my God, my God, why have you forsaken me?'" Such a construction only makes sense if it went from Greek to Aramaic, not the other way around. Also, the Greek has grammatical constructions that wouldn't have been used if it were a translation from Aramaic to Greek. It does, however, have grammatical constructions that indicate that the writers had Aramaic as their first language, but it still clearly was written in Greek first (of course, because the Aramaic dialect of the Aramaic version didn't even exist for 200-300 years after it was written in Greek). The argument that the Greek transliteration of Yeshuah means "son of Zeus" is utter hogwash, made up by someone who doesn't have the foggiest idea about how to use Koigne Greek, and Greek scholars find that assertion to be utterly absurd. The ancient Greek manuscript in the Vatican that shows the Greek numerals for 666 is different to the other ancient manuscripts in this respect - the others actually spelled out the words for six hundred, sixty and six, instead of using the numerals. Thus, the argument I've heard about a name sounding like "Cheexus," with the implication that it meant "Jesus" would be the mark of the beast is utterly absurd. When Jerome wrote his Greek text, from which he translated the Latin Vulgate, he tried to save as much time as possible, so he reduced the words to the digits for numbers. The "Cheexus" thing didn't appear in the oldest manuscripts (other than Jerome's), and it didn't appear in the Textus Receptus, which was instigated in Antioch at a very early time (prior to Jerome). There was absolutely no attempt whatsoever to use the tetragrammaton ("YHWH" - sorry Orthodox Jews, but some people wouldn't know what I was talking about otherwise, and no, this is NOT taking God's name in vain) in the Greek texts of the new testament, but instead it exclusively uses the Greek word for "God" instead. Clearly, the original apostles didn't adhere to the doctrine of sacred names, which should tell everyone that the sacred names doctrine is something new. While it's nice to know what the real names are, they're obviously not a salvation issue (as many sacred namers seem to believe), otherwise the apostles would've said so in the new testament. So, sacred namers, you need to stop arguing about semantics. And by the way, the Living Church of God, which runs this channel (and I'm neither a member nor a prospective member, but I know people who are members) keeps all ten commandments (including the proper Sabbath day from Friday at sunset to Saturday at sunset), keeps the annual Holy Days, keeps the law of clean and unclean meats, rejects Christmas/Easter/Halloween/Valentines day/Sunday. They also know the real names of Jesus (Yeshuah), and God (Yahweh), but they also realise that it doesn't make any sense whatsoever to "preach Yeshuah" because most people won't have the slightest idea what they're talking about. Again, stop arguing semantics about something that obviously isn't a salvation issue (otherwise, the apostles would've said so in their writings).

[@awfelia]

Am happy to say I have copy of Tacitus' book! ❤

[@gomez51791]

Really “ 🤦🏽‍♀️ …. Wow of course!!!

[@Tryityoulllikeit]

Jesus or Yeshua , which has the power to defeat death ? Acts 4.12 one name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved... Peace

[@elizabethjackson3744]

Just came on Hi guys

[@ellenlefavour628]

Not by that name, although there are many Hispanic men who go by that name. No Hebrew of the house of Y’hudah or any of the twelve tribes ever had that name then or today. No J in Hebrew, no J period until 1524. Isn’t it time to stop alienating our brother Y’hudah with a Sunday keeping, Torah denying, ham eating messiah that they know full well is a Roman Catholic construct, not from the line of David or who ever walked the roads or wilderness places of Israel. It’s baffling that a denomination that has eyes opened to so much truth in the Word can be so blind to such a known fact of history and Satanic deception. Read a 1611 KJV - there is no Jesus even that recently in the Bible. Yes, it is hard to let go of those deeply held and cherished deceptions like Christmas, Easter, Sunday, and Jesus but in the days nearing the end of this age, isn’t it time to free ourselves of them? His name is Yeshua - a good, easy to pronounce Hebrew name which means salvation.

[@michelefritts6953]

This church does keep the Sabbath, keeps the laws and statutes and surely doesn’t eat the unclean ham. Their Messiah, also would not have partaken of any either. Sadly the Jews of Christ’s, or Yeshua’s, day denied Him then and still deny Him to this day.

[@ellenlefavour628]

@@michelefritts6953 Many did not, of course. His disciples were Jews. He came only to the lost tribes of Israel, so all His early followers were Jews. They all knew Him as Yeshua which is His name, and a Jew (of the tribe of Judah and of the line of David) is how He is identified. Whether this denomination keeps the sabbath, moedim and dietary instructions of Yah is not the point - the fact that they prefer to use the name made up by the world rather than the one given Him by the Father is. When Satan goes to such extremes to change the Word, it should be a major red flag of warning to us that we need to look deeply into why. If it didn’t matter, he wouldn’t have bothered. But he knows the Word says there is only one name under heaven by which we must be saved. He is the adversary. Did God really say…? He never stops with that age old deception technique. Millions of Christians who follow Jesus believe He did away with Torah and nailed it to the stake. No one who follows Yeshua believes that. Coincidence? Shabbat shalom.

[@ErikPehrsson]

Did you watch this video before leaving your comment? Jesus was alive and died for the sins of all humanity.

[@ellenlefavour628]

@@ErikPehrsson Did you read and study out for yourself the historical evidence that no Hebrew of the tribe of Y’hudah named Jesus ever lived in Yerushalayim? I certainly don’t deny messiah Yeshua, Son of the living God, our high priest, soon coming king and redeemer; but His given Hebrew name which means “salvation”, is Yeshua. You can call Him Jesus, and He will know who you are talking about, but that’s not His name. Many people call me Helen or Elaine, neither of which is my name, but I know they are talking to me so I respond and don’t correct them. My name however is not “the name by which we must be saved”, so not important. His is, at least to me and the many who have come to know His name. “Salvation exists in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved.” Acts 4:12. Just study to show yourself approved and see if you don’t find it to be true. We can’t blindly accept everything the church system teaches us because it is filled with errors. We are called to be good Bereans.

[@aeneaslime2968]

We know exactly what you are saying..but it's a translation to English so average people can follow for understanding.

[@peacefulpatriots]

Jesus IS a real person.

[@rogrog1616]

No Jesus in John 1 v1.

[@Rosie05610]

O ye of little faith, for blessed are they, who have believed, yet have not seen. As in all those who do believe Jesus is the Christ and is who He says He is without having to have seen Him.

[@mr.nobodyhere]

Have You Heard The Only Gospel That Saves Today? Jesus already forgave ALL of your sins at the cross at Calvary according to Ephesians 1:7 kjv; 2nd Corinthians 5:19 kjv, and 1st Corinthians 15:1-4 king james. Jesus paid your sin debt in full on your behalf, and if you want to be saved and go to heaven, all you have to do is believe on what he accomplished, not anything you did. Stop asking for forgiveness of sins Jesus already forgave, stop confessing sins that Jesus already buried in the grave, and HAVE FAITH in Christs performance on the cross, and not yours. A prayer is of yourself. It cant save anyone. FAITH in Christ and him alone is required to be justified rightious in Gods eyes. You cannot get something you already have, and God cannot forgive sins he already forgave through the blood of Jesus Christs' work at Calvary. *Thats the good news. Thats the gospel of your salvation (1st Corinthians 15:1-4 kjv):* Jesus died for your sins according to the scriptures, he was buried and took them to the grave, and he resurrected three days later without them according to the scriptures. Put full trust in this and be saved right now. Or suffer eternal damnation in your unbelief in hell. Salvation is not about getting your sins forgiven, its believing they already are. Its YOUR forever place, and its YOUR choice. Grace and peace

[@MariaWambugha-nh1wh]

Jusus is really and the laws is really ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@petersack5074]

6:40 TIME > > >> Proper English : Lukes' ( denotes, ' ownership ) Learn, about contractions; SIR ! Luke's is a contraction, meaning = Luke is . ERROR

[@AutoEngineerVideos]

"Lukes'," as you've written means "belonging to the people who all have the name Luke." In other words, belonging to several people, who all have the name Luke (ie: you've given the apostrophe for plural possessive, not singular possessive). The use of an apostrophe between a name and an "s" is the correct use of the apostrophe for the possessive tense of someone's name (and in saying "someone's," I've also used it correctly - and I've checked to ensure that it's correct, just in case). The presentation is correct, and you are absolutely incorrect. Where you seem to have messed up is that you do understand that ONE of the meanings of "Luke's" is indeed "Luke is." The apostrophe usage for "Luke is" and "belonging to Luke" are identical, and the context needs to be checked to know whether it's possessive or "Luke is." Please go and learn English grammar before you try to correct people over the grammatical mistakes that you perceive them to have made. You've only succeeded in showing others that you think you know more than you actually do. The correct forms of possessive nouns can be found on the Grammerly website, and having checked it myself to ensure that I hadn't made a mistake, I can confirm that I had remembered it correctly, the presentation was correct, and you were wrong.

[@Cheere]

He s real, visit me