Was the Qur'an copied from the Bible? A short and concise answer.

/ bloggingtheology
/ freemonotheist
I quote from 'A Clear Quran' a new translation by Dr. Mustafa Khattab theclearquran....

[@MBGamesHD]

Short and concise answer: no Long answer: Hell no

[@BloggingTheology]

🤣😂🤪

[@ahmedfaraz1080]

Very underrated comment

[@BloggingTheology]

@@ahmedfaraz1080 best comment so far.

[@ahmedfaraz1080]

I like your work though. Thanks for sharing the knowledge

[@IbnMurrah]

@@cervezaway7049 7th Century Arabs would beg to differ.

[@asakore1]

How do one even copy the christian bible, they keep on updating its content by the second.

[@mohammedanwar9415]

@Lionel Proctor that's because Christians today don't have the original words as spoken by Jesus (peace be upon him). The earliest scriptures are in Greek which was not the language of the Israelites. Which is why you have numerous contradictions in the bible, such as 2 completely different accounts of how judas died.

[@MohammadIrfanKamal]

😂😂😂

[@mohammedanwar9415]

@Lionel Proctor oh so on one hand he gave money back church and hung himself and on the other hand he used the money to purchase a field and fell with his insides gushing out. These are 2 completely different versions of how he died, one is obviously wrong. So how is it not a contradiction, and the bible is full of them unfortunately. Also how Christians follow the same gospels but have completely different creeds for Catholics don't consider anyone who follows the trinity as being Christian and vice versa. It is well known that the Greek Bible was written by people who never ever met Jesus. The aramaic bibles in Jerusalem today were translated from the Greek Bible, there are no scriptures from anyone who was present at the time of Jesus.

[@mannypakyaw3773]

Islam has no originality like their book of Quran which was copied from Old and New testament. Muslims cannot tell you who was the author of Quran because their fake prophet Mohammed was illiterate 😢

[@marvelstark3797]

how do you know, that bible content was updated?

[@jeffxcc]

3 Miracles Jesus did in the Quran?! That blows my mind, I had no idea about what is in the Quran! I will continue to learn with an open mind and heart.

[@Megaspinosaurusrex]

That's nice to hear that. As a muslim, I'm glad people are willing to learn about islam and develop their own view on it. And ignore the negative view that was spread in recent years.

[@qaisjamal]

Yes, and there is a whole Chapter named after Merry, mother of Jesus. I am sorry your media and education hides alot of facts about Islam for years

[@Nas721]

Welcome brother, there is no compulsion in religion. Whoever seeks guidance sincerely will be guided. My best wishes to you

[@mtcemngr5292]

@@qaisjamal ... Btw, the third chapter of Quran Aal Imraan mostly deals with Jesus AS & his relatives. Imraan is the father of Mariam AS (Virgin Mary)

[@lilygrace9071]

Keep on learning about Islam brother!! 👍🏼👍🏼

[@mutazmoghrabi2137]

Paul I can see the light of faith shining from your face, may Allah bless you.

[@Freedom4PalestineEndZioNazism]

نور الله وجهك

[@hamsaud420]

@@Freedom4PalestineEndZioNazism ربي يهديه والله اني حبيته ماهو عشان موقفه تجاه الإسلام لكن لأجل شغفه للبحث عن الحق

[@haterswillnotsucceed8089]

No, its just a lamp over his nobel bald head 😂 I love brother Paul for Allah's sake.

[@SAJANOVA]

Hahahahah ur just an enthusiastic bro, I am afraid Paul should work harder to be thankful and a true believer.

[@Woman_OfGod14.]

Ur funny

[@truthseeker9945]

Paul has such a calming voice. Love listening to his insights. Thanks Paul

[@marsolo1193]

I love paul's voice too even i need to read the subtitles to understand the video lol

[@sara22270]

right.mashaa Allah 😇

[@TheologyWithLogic]

I have made a video on the same topic, please have a look.

[@nho2x113]

You are like a assassin, people are talking bad things about islam, and you just come silently to disprove them. Thanks for your work, I hope your channel gets bigger so the liars can see.

[@abuhamidal-ghazali5035]

Although orientialist say that Quran has uninspired, mythical stories and legends.. We believe its the word of Allah (SWT)

[@Q8ijin]

@@abuhamidal-ghazali5035 orientalists are forefront men for empires

[@abuhamidal-ghazali5035]

@@Q8ijin don't forget that we are also called to set up a caliphate

[@matthewn2559]

Mohammad killed people, had a child bride, tortured people, and took to "wife" a woman whose husband he killed. Can you seriously believe that Mohammad is the last and final prophet of God? Does anyone have a son whom they want to grow up and then go on to killing people, having a child bride, and torturing people? Murder, raping, and torturing are what we as humanity need to be saved from. Mohammad was a sinner who needed a Savior. Islam shows what a terrible state the world is in- that a large group of people think a person like Mohammad is the answer to life's troubles. Read the Sermon on the Mount in the Gospel of Matthew chapters 5 through 7 and you will see who the true answer is.

[@nho2x113]

@@matthewn2559 ok mister brainwashed from cp and others.

[@sisportsengine5425]

Paul, the best thing about your videos is that they are to the point and supported by references. Keep up the good work. You are doing a great service to Muslim’s and non Muslims alike. You are strengthening our faith and helping everyone see the truth.

[@IbnMurrah]

*“This Qur’an clarifies for the Children of Israel most of what they differed over. And it is a guidance and mercy for the believers.” - (Qur’an 27:76 - 77)* There’s a reason why these same stories are mentioned. Prophet Muhammad never claimed that he was coming with something completely new.

[@aminebouarfa2430]

@@fedesetrtatio1 The one who did this syncretism of old testament, rabbinical litterature, pagan belives and gnostic scriptures should have been a great educated erudite who spent his life reading books and learning from grand masters. Oh wait. Someone is telling me in the ear that in fact the person who did this syncretism is an illiterate sheep herder living in the desert.

[@aminebouarfa2430]

@@fedesetrtatio1 Yes they wrote the Quran in the 9th century then slew the Jabberwocky and went on to save Narnia.

[@aminebouarfa2430]

@@fedesetrtatio1 Glad to make you happy. Have a good day sir

[@Commander-Arcamus-]

Just to clarify: 2 Samuel 11: David impregnated his neighbors wife before conspiring to kill the husband Genesis 19:1-11-Lot lets his daughters get gang raped Genesis 19:30-38: Lot gets drunk and has sex with his daughters in a cave 2 Peter 2:7-8 God says Lot is righteous Genesis 9:21 Noah got drunk and naked in his tent.

[@Commander-Arcamus-]

@@fedesetrtatio1 The point is Christian prophets are supposed to be holy righteous men chosen by God to guide mankind. If you admit that the prophets were horrible people, then you also admit that “God” made numerous mistakes. But you have another major issue with Paul: The Bible was first WRITTEN by ONE man (Paul) a SIGNIFICANT time (20 years) after Jesus “death” ie a NON-EYEWITNESS. Paul’s’ only claim to authority is a story he told that he met Jesus on the road to Damascus. There is no other source to confirm his story so his word is all that supports it. He claims In Galatians 1:11-12, that he received divine revelation from Jesus. This means all of Paul’s writings must be free from error, otherwise he lied and did not meet nor was inspired by Jesus. Furthermore, Paul made a false prophecy: 1 Corinthians 15:51-52 states not everyone in his time will die before the end of the world and return of Jesus. This is a false prophecy because the world is still alive. Conclusion: Paul was a liar and the origin of the NT was falsified. This is supported by NT Scholar C.K Barrett in first epistle to the Corinthians P. 381. C.S Lewis states about a similar world ending prophecy in Mark 13:30 that it is “the most embarrassing verse in the Bible” in The worlds last night and other essays, P.97. Christians will say this prophecy is false if we understand it literally. If we understood it figuratively then it can work with impacting future people. However if we look at other passages, we can confirm Paul meant his prophecy literally. 1 Corinthians 7:28-31 clearly tells people at the time of Paul to live as if immediate destruction is coming. He used the words “from now on”, “time is short”, and the “world is passing away”. In this verse, Paul urges people to be celibate, emotionless, and ascetic. It makes no sense for Paul to think people ought to behave this way and thrive for 2000 years especially when told to be celibate under the assumption the end of the world would happen in that lifetime. Deuteronomy 18:22 states that if a prophecy did not come true spoken in the name of the Lord, it did not come from the Lord. This shows that Paul did not speak truthful and was not inspired by God. Therefore-Paul was a false apostle. Furthermore, Paul misquoted scripture: Deuteronomy 30:14 states to obey the law. Paul quotes the first quarter of the verse here yet abrogated the obedience command in Romans 10:8-10. So Paul is preaching the exact opposite of what the OT states. Paul is pushing only for salvation via faith but the OT makes it clear that works is extremely important. Another clear contradiction. Furthermore, Paul misinterpreted scripture: Another of Paul’s core teachings stress that all God’s covenantal promises to Abraham were fulfilled by the coming of Jesus. “The promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. Scripture does not say “and to seeds,” meaning many people, but “and to your seed,” meaning one person, who is Christ.” (Galatians 3:16.) Here, Paul is making the argument that god’s promise to Abraham did not speak of seeds in the plural but rather seed in the singular and concludes the single seed is a reference to just one man (Jesus). Genesis 17:19 used the Hebrew word for seed “Zera” which serves as a collective noun that can be used to refer to one or multiple descendants. It depends on the context of the scripture. Similar to the English word sheep which can refer to one or many sheep. So now the question is, how do we know if the context is different and Genesis is talking about one or multiple seeds? In Genesis 13:16, God promised here that Abraham would be blessed with a multitude of descendants likening the “seed” to the dust of the earth. Therefore the correct context of the seed is not singular as Paul incorrectly interpreted it but plural. Furthermore, Paul used wrong scripture: Paul taught that the nation of Israel will be saved from its sins via Jesus. (Romans 11:26). Paul quoted this from the Old Testament book of Isaiah 59:20. There is a clear mismatch here: In Romans, Paul states the savior will remove sin from Israel: “Godlessness away from Jacob”. Isaiah however states the savior will come to Israel after repentance from sin. So why the confusion? Paul seems to have been quoting from the Septuagint. (Isaiah 59:20). Paul’s quote in Romans aligns closely to the Greek Septuagint. However, there are in fact, two variant readings of the Old Testament. There is the Hebrew, and there is also the Greek Septuagint that Paul clearly quotes from in Romans. There is powerful evidence that the Greek Septuagint contains a later reading due to the Dead Sea scrolls which serve as the oldest surviving manuscripts for the Old Testament support the reading that is found in the Hebrew Scriptures. This means when Paul decided to quote from the Greek Septuagint, he unknowingly used the later incorrect reading. Clearly, “God” would not have inspired him to make this mistake. Furthermore, Paul distorted scripture: Paul argued that nobody can attain righteousness through the works of the Mosaic law. (Romans 3:10-20). Here, Paul quotes 6 separate passages from the Old Testament books of Psalms and Isaiah. The first 3 verses are from Psalm 14:2-3, the next 2 are from Psalm 5:9, the next 1 is from Psalm 140:3, the next 1 is from Psalm 10:7, the next 1 is from Isaiah 59:7-8, the next 1 is from Psalm 36:1. Paul strung these passages together to appear as one quote. Looking at Paul’s quotation of Psalm 14:2-3 in Romans 3:10-20, we see in the original passage in Psalm 14:1-5, it’s talking about those who say “there is no God”. These are the same people said to “do no good”. Such evil doers are then contrasted with a second group of people referred to as “my people” who are said to be the company of the righteous. Paul seems to have distorted this passage. It does NOT say as Paul quotes it “that no human being is righteous, not even one”, rather it says, that those who deny god are not righteous. Furthermore, Paul employs scriptural contradiction: Paul gave a reason as to why God revealed the law to Moses and the Israelites in (Romans 3:19). According to Paul, the law was reveled to make us realize that it is impossible to keep and that we are all guilty before god. If we go back to the Old Testament regarding what God has to say about the law we will find that God says the law is “not too difficult for you or beyond your reach….” (Deuteronomy 30:11-14). This is the complete opposite of what Paul claimed in Romans 3:19. Moreover, Paul has extremely negative things to say about the law. He called it a curse in Galatians 3:10 and also called his last efforts of keeping the law as “garbage” in Philippians 3:5-8. This negative criticism is at odds with what the Old Testament teaches as made apparent in Deuteronomy 30:16. This passage from Deuteronomy states that the law will allow one to live and increase and will be blessed. Paul’s teaching clearly contradict the Old Testament teachings on many aspects here in opposition to the God that inspired the Old Testament. Furthermore, Paul utilizes deception: The Bible says that towards the end of his ministerial career, Paul visited Jerusalem which was home to 1000’s of Christians who obeyed the law of Moses. In fact, senior Christians directly confronted Paul on rumors he was preaching against the law of Moses. We see this in Acts 21:18-21. Now we notice if Paul was truly a genuine apostle, we should be expecting him to be forthcoming about his true beliefs and teachings. If we see how Paul act in reality, we see a completely hypocritical story. We see this in Acts 21:22-26 in which the senior Christians in Jerusalem commanded Paul to undergo a public head shaving ritual that was derived from the law of Moses. Here, Paul submissively complied with their command effectively denying the rumors that he preached against the law of Moses. In the aforementioned point, we see Paul’s extreme negative reaction to the law of Moses (calling it a curse and efforts to obey it as garbage). Therefore, by conducting himself in the manner of obeying the head shaving command from the Old Testament, yet enacting clear animosity and opposition to it, Paul reveals his true nature of being a 2-faces hypocrite as he showed one side to the senior Christians with his behavior and another side in his writings. Paul states that Jews are equal to non Jews in Galatians 3:27-28 and are not bound to keep any of the Mosiac laws so that they can serve in the way of the spirit in Romans 7:6. Here, we can see very clearly Paul taught the exact things he was accused of and deceptively denied them regardless. Conclusion: Via Paul’s own writings in Romans, Galatians, Philippians, 1 Corinthians, Acts… we find a plethora of red flags including: False prophecies Misquotations Misinterpretations Wrong scriptures Distortion Contradictions Deception Not only does this solidify the fact that Paul was not a trustworthy figure, this also shows the Bible has been infected by his writings with over half of its books being attributed to him. So when one reads the Bible to learn about Jesus, they are using the lens of Paul who has been proven to be an unreliable source. This only adds on to the fact, Paul was never with Jesus and wrote 20 years after Jesus further solidifying unreliability and inauthenticity. ***If Paul never existed, what would Christians believe? The Quran was COMPILED (not written) ONE year after the prophets death by MULTIPLE men who were WITH him (eye witness) and were MEMORIZERS of the Quran (Abu Bakr, Zaid Ibn Thabit, Abdur Rahman, etc.)

[@dr.omarsabry1969]

Thousands of examples can be given {The Holy Quran says that after a pharaoh’s drowning, God took his body out of the sea so that it could be an example of a tyrant for whom who want to learn .. The Bible did not say this}

[@cafeespresso99]

glad to see the number of subscribers has zoomed past the 10K mark. insha'Allah 20k soon!

[@BloggingTheology]

I hope so too

[@JaleelBeig]

Detractors be like When Qur'an narrates a story that was told earlier: "Qur'an copies the Bible" When Qur'an reveals something new: "Quran is trying to pretend it's original"

[@redbluelife4297]

👏

[@abuhamidal-ghazali5035]

Although orientialist say that Quran has uninspired, mythical stories and legends.. We believe its the word of Allah (SWT)

[@ianjacob4087]

Jesus is alive

[@ianjacob4087]

@@cervezaway7049 call on him in your time of need ....just try it he's waiting for you ...

[@Musik.Doctor]

@@cervezaway7049 have faith... He is soon going to come... Very soon.. lots of prophecies have been fulfilled.. it seems we are the end

[@popcornagain7034]

Can you imagine that I was looking for a reliable video concerning this point ? Thank you, sir. By the way, Al - Kheder with( kh) the same sound in Spanish or Portuguese but not found in English.

[@mustafash.9362]

A short yet informative video! How educated you are, masha'Allah! Thank you, Sir.

[@8060163]

I love your Chanel and wait on a daily basis for new uploads. God bless you

[@MarianAMusse]

Paul Jumah Mubarak this short videos as well others are gems. Jazzah Allah Khayran

[@namlas002]

I like it when you talk about your reading outcome and just be plain about it. No denial, no sugarcoat. I saw Dr Gary Miller explain during Ahmad Deedat time stated... He unable to find the reason/motive of Prophet Muhammad preaching Islam....thus left no other reason except what Muhammad SAW claim himself to be....a messenger of God. I would also be interested to know who do you think Muhammad SAW is, if he is not messenger of God. As for now, Im with Dr Gary Miller, unable to deny Muhammmad SAW claim. Tq for your sharing Looking forward to see your next working

[@jabirzia6848]

Bible is NOT the ENJEEL which we muslims believe was revealed to the prophet Jesus(PBUH), Bible may contain parts of the translation of the originsl script(ENJEEL) But it also contains contradictions, pornography & innumerable scientific errors which could NOT be attributed to God almighty. So in a nutshell Quran & Enjeel were two divine revelations which were revealed by God almighty to two prophets i.e prophet Muhammad(PBUH) & prophet Jesus(PBUH) respectively. Nowadays Enjeel could Not be found in its original form [because it was meant only for a particular people in a particular time period in the time of Jesus(PBUH)] BUT Quran is in its original form because it is the last & final revelation which is being protected from corruption by God almighty (because it's meant for the whole humanity till the day of judgement).

[@rickastley5321]

@@fedesetrtatio1 how ? Can u explain ?

[@Z781-y2r]

@@rickastley5321 Bible New testament is 600 years older than quran , it has copied many prophecies .

[@davidchung441]

Quran was never existed, and it wasn't written by Muhammad, Quran was created based of recitation which is the most unreliable source of information. The Quran only exist 200 years after muhammad. He is not even the eye witness to Jesus life. If I want to learn about Jesus , I would prefer to learn it from the bible , which is written by disciple who witness Jesus.

[@davidchung441]

To even say Quran is the only book of truth is a lie , because the truth is already exist before Quran , which is Christianity.

[@SchuelerCool]

The story of Noah is the best example to see that the Quran is right and not copied the Bible.

[@abuhamidal-ghazali5035]

Although orientialist say that Quran has uninspired, mythical stories and legends.. We believe its the word of Allah (SWT)

[@ConsideringPhlebas]

What do you mean by this?

[@SchuelerCool]

@@ConsideringPhlebas Did you read the Bible version of Noah?

[@ConsideringPhlebas]

@@SchuelerCool Are you referring to 'world flood' versus 'local flood' idea?

[@SchuelerCool]

@@ConsideringPhlebas I would go first with the date. When was the the flood happens according to Bible?

[@zaniffakarim4721]

Thanks for shedding some light on this issue. People don't want to accept the fact the the Holy Quran came from the same source, the one and only God. Good job.

[@HD13POWER]

Prophet Ishmael was the offering, prophet Aaron didn't make the golden calf, prophet Lut is a righteous being, Pharaoh body is preserved and not lost... the list coninues...

[@servantofgod1374]

Good points, except scholars of Islam all differ on whether it was Ishaq or Ishmael was the sacrificed son :P

[@HD13POWER]

@@servantofgod1374 scholars of Islam are not Islam and not a divine source. We respect them but they are wrong in this matter. Islam is the Holy Quran the words of God not the word of scholars. Mention too, in the Quran, the story of *Ishmael. He was true to his promise* , a messenger and a prophet. (19:54) And remember *Ishmael, Idris, and Dhu’l-Kifl: they were all steadfast* . (21:85) When the boy was old enough to work with his father, Abraham said, ‘My son, I have seen myself sacrificing you in a dream. What do you think?’ He said, ‘Father, do as you are commanded and, God willing, *you will find me steadfast* .’ (37:102) *Conclusion:* There is no mention of (steadfast) word linked to (Isaac) in all of the Holy Quran verses. There is also the context of chapter 37:85-113 mentions that Isaac news was after the offering. There is also the fact the news of Isaac included the news of Jacob altogether at once in chapter 11:71. So, it can't be asking to offer Isaac and Abraham received a promise that Isaac will have a son called Jacob. Finally: It's a weak test to kill your second born child if you're old and you have another child. The test is much harder when you're old and asked to offer your only son. *Another View is in the Bible:* It says "your only son" in Genesis 22:2, 12, 16 ESV. And God Himself said "Ishmael is also your son" in Genesis 21:13 EASY. So, "your only son" statement cannot occur except if the second one wasn't born yet.

[@servantofgod1374]

@@HD13POWER Mate, you literally used the same set of arguments that Ibn Kathir and others used. Those who believe Ishaq was the one to be sacrificed and yes, there was even a point in history where some scholars claimed there was consensus for this belief have their arguments too. Some of the sahabah like Umar bin al-Khattab, Ali and others believed it was Ishaq too. Are you now going to claim they didn't know the Qur'an?

[@HD13POWER]

@@servantofgod1374 Yes, they are wrong in this matter. I don't think you believe that Isaac and Ishmael were both the offerings? One opinion is true and the other is false and there is no doubt about that. They did ijtihad and maybe Israelites stories affected their judgment but it's clear that Ishmael was the offering in the Holy Quran. His name means "He heard God".

[@servantofgod1374]

@@HD13POWER You're saying they were affected by Bani Isra'il but you're literally saying his name means what you said it does. Brother where from the Qur'an or any hadith can you prove his name means that? Imam al-Tabari and the biggest of scholars who explained the Qur'an believed it was Ishaq, you think they didn't know the Qur'an? There is a difference of opinion on this, end of. Nobody before Ibn Taymiyyah ever said that the other side were sympathetic towards it being Ishaq because of Bani Israil, infact countless scholars said there is agreement amongst them that it is Ishaq. Watch Yasir Qadhi's video on this and you will see him explain this differing in thorough detail.

[@Saaa769]

I see your videos and I see academic integrity intact. Not because you are defending my faith. But because you you are using a holistic use of sources and making critically thought arguments. Something that lacks in society today. May Allah accept from you. Would love to get in touch with you sometime.

[@monzersami1642]

It'd be always better to include your opinion at the end of the video.. sometimes your approach could be inspiring and hinting for something that not all the viewers are wary of! This video you just quoted .. I'm just pinning an opinion here coz I've been a fan. And I like your intelligence.

[@buntyrajput3317]

Thank you soo much sir..you are a big inspiration..and your videos have really boosted my emaan.. lots of love ❤️

[@BloggingTheology]

Wow thanks!

[@buntyrajput3317]

And for sure you are in my duaa for rest of my life.. thanks for saving my drowning emaan...

[@HebrewsvJohnv]

The Quran gets the Trinity wrong, mentioning Jesus and Mary and not mentioning the Holy Spirit, because the false Angel Jibril was trying to steal the identity of the Holy Spirit and create Islamic Jesus (Isa). Three Quranic verses may directly refer to this doctrine.4:171, 5:73, and 5:116-118. So... Allah got it wrong because false Angel Jibril was masquerading as the Holy Spirit for Islamic Theology, that is why Jibril then created a false Jesus that was not divine or crucified in the Quran. Jibril (Demon) , Messenger of Allah, tells Muhammad to take 6 year old Aisha and marry her, and Muhammad in his lust for a child totally overrules Abu Bakr's Objection to marriage! Aisha reported: Gabriel came to the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, with her image on a green, silken cloth and he said, “Verily, THIS is your wife in this world and in the Hereafter.” Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 3880. Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Albani. Narrated Hisham's father: Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married 'Aisha when she was a girl of SIX years of age, and he consumed that marriage when she was nine years old. Source: bukhari 5: 58 236 Muhammad was over 50 WHEN HE MARRIED A SIX YEAR OLD. In addition Sahih Bukhari 1:1:3 states that Waraqa said the Angel Jibril Muhammad saw was the same Moses saw, but the angel Moses saw, NEVER identified itself as Gabriel to Moses in the Torah, EVER! Muslim theologians also falsely try to make Muhammad the Comforter (The Holy Spirit) from John 14 v 15-17 and v 25-26, as well as John 15 v 26, John 16 v 7-8 and John 16 13-15. Muhammad could not point to a single Biblical scripture he could find himself in, unlike Jesus, and Islamic thought denies the Father and The Son... 1 John 2:22‭-‬23: Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: (but) he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also. Secondly, Allah has NEVER come to earth and ever proven he can live above sin, so he is nothing but false in proving he himself can live above sin and granted Muhammad to marry Zaid's wife when Jesus says we should not divorce and remarry in the Bible. Matthew 19 v 9. Thirdly, neither Muhammad or Islamic Jesus ever rose from the grave to prove the resurrection and eternal life and Allah could not make this happen as he has no power over death, Allah and Jibril are just false demons. Why Muhammad is a false prophet/not a prophet of Yahweh, The God of Abraham and The Bible? There is no promise of salvation through Ishmael's lineage, 'hence him being cast out after mocking Isaac in Genesis and going to the Zam Zam well in the first place!' There is NOT a single claimed prophet from the lineage of Ishmael in the Bible, and until Muhammad's false claim 500 years after Christ had resurrected, and all the disciples had passed away completing the canon. Paul tells you if an angel brings another gospel to you contradictory (such as Jibril supposedly brought to Muhammad in a cave), in which Christ never died on a cross or was resurrected let him be accursed: Galatians 1:8 KJV But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. Next.... In Sahih Bukhari 4480, Jibril is stated to be the enemy of the Jews and makes a scientific error when stating why a child will resemble one parent more than another. Science has shown that we are more likely to look like our Fathers than mothers and there is no scientific validity to the notion that which ever parent discharges first the child will look more like this parent. Narrated Anas: `Abdullah bin Salam heard the news of the arrival of Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) (at Medina) while he was on a farm collecting its fruits. So he came to the Prophet (ﷺ) and said, "I will ask you about three things which nobody knows unless he be a prophet. Firstly, what is the first portent of the Hour? What is the first meal of the people of Paradise? And what makes a baby look like its father or mother?'. The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "Just now Gabriel has informed me about that." `Abdullah said, "Gabriel?" The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "Yes." `Abdullah said, "He, among the angels is the enemy of the Jews." On that the Prophet (ﷺ) recited this Holy Verse:-- "Whoever is an enemy to Gabriel (let him die in his fury!) for he has brought it (i.e. Qur'an) down to your heart by Allah's permission." (2.97) Then he added, "As for the first portent of the Hour, it will be a fire that will collect the people from the East to West. And as for the first meal of the people of Paradise, it will be the caudite (i.e. extra) lobe of the fish liver. And if a man's discharge proceeded that of the woman, then the child resembles the father, and if the woman's discharge proceeded that of the man, then the child resembles the mother." John 4 v 22, additionally says salvation is of the Jews, NOT the Ishmaelites! Jesus, as the son of God, and as God in John 1 v 1, is who we are saved by, Acts 4:10‭-12 KJV: Be it known unto you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God RAISED from the dead, even by him doth this man stand here before you whole. Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved. Leviticus 17 v 11, and Hebrews 9 v 22, let you know there is no forgiveness without bloodshed for sin atonement but Islamic Doctrine says no sin atonement is needed and Christ never died on the cross, which is a lie. Psalms 147 v 19‭-‬20, shows the Lord only gives his statutes and judgements unto Israelites (which would include Paul and The Apostles) only, being able to give laws, and doctrine (including for salvation) unto Gentiles, as in Acts ch 10 and Acts ch 15, NOT to Muhammad! Ishmaelites like Muhammad have no entitlement or validity in contradictory revelation (such as on atonement), and God passes his message even unto salvation through Israelites ONLY, then unto the Gentiles: Psalms.147.19-20.KJV He sheweth his word unto Jacob, his statutes and his judgments unto Israel. He hath not dealt so with any nation: and as for his judgments, they have not KNOWN them. Galatians 3 v 8-14, shows you a crucified Christ, who later rose from death was 'the promise' to Abraham. V8: And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed. Galatians 3 V 14: That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith. John 1:29 KJV, says.. The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world. The Passover Lamb is also mysteriously missing from the Quran, despite the Quran mentioning Moses 135 times, and mentioning Moses’ confrontations with Pharaoh 27 times in the first 89 of its 114 chapters. Not even once in the exodus saga accounted in the Quran is there any mention of the Passover. The Passover Lamb is a picture of the task and process to bring us back to God, which would become complete in Jesus as our Passover Lamb. Christ was crucified at Passover, as an eternal sin atonement, and The Passover Lamb, this foreshadowed the shed blood of Christ for a believer's sins to seal them in the Lamb's book of life. Hebrews 9 v 27 and John 3 v 16.

[@k00lmoh]

@@HebrewsvJohnv we don't belive in your book, and we don't believe this is what Isa (AS) came with, why are you quoting your book...

[@HebrewsvJohnv]

@@k00lmoh The Koran is plagiarised from Jewish, Christian, Arab paganism, Zoroastrianism, Apocryphal/Gnostic Gospels, Protoevangelum of James (140-170)AD and the Gospel of Pseudo Matthew. a) . Q18:8-25 “Surah Al Kahf” The Companions of the Cave The entire tale was plagiarised from a Christian myth called the “Seven sleepers of Ephesus”. First recorded by Jacob of Suarag in the 5th century in Syriac, then into Latin in the 6th c/y by Gregory of Tours in his work “The Glory of the Martyrs”. The story was slightly altered by the authors of the Koran from Christians being persecuted by Romans for not following their Gods, to Muslims being persecuted for not following Pagan gods. b) The New Testament Apocrypha is a collection of “extra canonical Christian writings.” The Koran plagiarizes many tales of Jesus (like making a clay bird come alive and speaking as a new born) and Mary straight from these. I.e. Surah Al Maeda 5:110 and Surah Al E Imran 3:49. In roughly June 2021, on his show let the Quran Speak, entitled Did The Quran copy from the Infancy Gospels, says 'Historians in looking at pre historic accounts for The Quran for infancy stories of Jesus see there must have been elements and traces and stories from which the Quran developed from,' sadly he said "Muslims celebrate these stories" and shamedly Muslims 'boast of these as a source of pride'. Even worse though is that Shabir Ally then goes onto say, 'is that even if you say from a historical perspective there is a connection between this and that Allah only guided Muhammad (in plagirizing from these non canonical absurd sources) to retain only that for The Quran which is compatible for Islamic theology, so stealing from the core but adapting the rest. c) The Korans “heaven” is plagiarised from a cycle of Christian Hymns called “Hymns of Paradise” written in the 4th c/y by St. Ephrem of Syria, 300 years before the time of Mohamed.i.e Q76 (Al Insaan) , Q77 (Al Mursalaat) , Q 78 ( Al Naba) , Q 83 ( Al Tatfeef) d) The Story of Solomon and Bathsheba: Q 27: 17-44. This exact tale comes from an earlier Jewish story from the “Second Targum of Esther” , “Targum Sheni” e) Abraham Being delivered from the Fire: Q 2:260 is the same as “Midrash Genesis Rabba” from the 5th c/y. Genesis 15:7, but with an interesting twist. When originally translating this story from Hebrew to Aramaic, which says Abraham was brought from” Ur of the Chaldeans”, Jonathan Ben Uzziel in his Targum wrongly rendered the Babylonian word “Ur” , which means “City” into the Aramaic word “fire”. , confusing it with the Hebrew word “Or” meaning light or fire. The original story still found its way into the Koran without Allah spotting this error. Note: Nimrod did not live at same time as Abraham. (5000-4500) BC Q21:50/70+ Q37:95 f) The Quran maintains that Jesus was not actually crucified and did not die on the cross. Despite these views and no eyewitness accounts, most modern scholars have maintained that the Crucifixion of Jesus is indisputable. The view that Jesus only appeared to be crucified and did not actually die predates Islam, and is found in several apocryphal/gnostic gospels such as The Second Treatise of The Great Seth, the teachings of Basilides, The Gospel of Matthias and The Coptic Apocalypse of Peter. Ibn ‘Abbas (d.68/687) a paternal cousin of Muhammad and esteemed by many Muslims as the “father of Quran commentary” and “the Ocean [of knowledge]” commented on Quran 4:157-158, that they slew Tatianos, a Roman soldier instead of Jesus. Ibn Kathir, follows traditions which suggest that a crucifixion did occur, but not with Jesus. After the event, Ibn Kathir reports the people were divided into three groups following three different narratives; The Jacobites believing 'God remained with us as long as He willed and then He ascended to Heaven;' The Nestorians believing 'The son of God was with us as long as he willed until God raised him to heaven;' and the third group of Christians who believing; 'The servant and messenger of God, Jesus, remained with us as long as God willed until God raised him to himself. Ibn Ishaq stated: 'that Jesus was replaced by someone named Sergius, while secondly reporting an account of Jesus' tomb being located at Medina.' Al-Masudi, reported the death of Christ under Tiberius. Tabari, divided the early reports regarding Jesus crucifixion into two groups. According to the first, one of Jesus disciples volunteers to take the form of his master and is crucified. According to the other, the Jew mistakenly carried only an empty resemblance to the cross. Al-Tabari also records an interpretation transmitted from Ibn Ishaq Bishr: "God caused Jesus to die for seven hours". Ibn al-Athir forwarded the report that it was Judas, the betrayer, while also mentioning the possibility it was a man named Natlianus. 10th and 11th-century Ismaili Shia scholars Ja'far ibn Mansur al-Yaman, Abu Hatim Ahmad ibn Hamdan al-Razi, Abu Yaqub al-Sijistani, Mu'ayyad fi'l-Din al-Shirazi and the group Ikhwan al-Safa affirm the historicity of the crucifixion, reporting Jesus was crucified and not substituted by another man as maintained by many other popular Qur'anic commentators and Tafsir. Shabir Ally, Muslim Apologist states: ‘I have followed the thinking of many who feel that it is not necessary to have the belief that someone else was substituted for Jesus. I distinguish between two meanings of crucifixion. One means simply “to hang on a cross”, but I believe the word crucifixion as used in the crucifixion as used in the Koran means to “kill a person by that means”. Shabir Ally in effect, admits that Jesus was put on the cross, but that he did not die on the cross, and therefore the koranic and biblical accounts are, to some degree, in harmony. He goes on to support his contention, saying: ‘There is a subtext, which points to the fact that Jesus could not be verified to have died on the cross. He may very well have been taken down while still alive.’ Shabir Ally points out that Jesus wasn’t on the cross for very long, whereas crucifixion normally took days to kill a man, noting Pilate’s astonishment that Jesus was apparently dead before nightfall. In this respect, Ally subscribes to the ‘swoon’ theory of the crucifixion: that Jesus passed out on the cross, but later revived. So, after years of denying plagiarism by the Koran, Dr Shabir Ally , one of Islam’s foremost debaters now admits to plagiarism giving the laughable explanation that “Allah wanted to convey his final message by using stories already familiar to us,” mistakes and all. Hebrews 9 v 27 and John 3 v 16.

[@hamed100]

Another point to note is that historical or archeological mistakes in the bible are not repeated in the Quran, for example, in the story of Joseph, the ruler of Egypt was addressed as the Pharaoh, where as this term was not used for the ruler at the time, so in the Quran the correct word for the Egyptian ruler is used, “The King”. In the time of Moses, the term Pharaoh is correctly used.

[@ibnbattoutaamouddouchanel6535]

Good point indeed

[@alyahamzah1952]

Amazing masya Allah

[@hamed100]

@Lionel Proctor The writer of the Bible was ignorant of the fact that during the earlier dynasty, at time of Josef, the Egyptians did not call their ruler as “Pharaoh “ but rather as “King”. In the Quran he is correctly referred as King and not as Pharaoh. During the time of Moses, he is correctly called the Pharaoh. It is obvious if the Quran was copied from the Bible, it would have also copied this mistake. This is just one example of the many mistakes in Bible, but corrected in the Quran.

[@hamed100]

@Lionel Proctor Brother you’ve misunderstood your own religion. What about Abraham and all the other prophets. Did Moses copy from Abraham or any other prophet before him? Did Jesus copy from a Moses when he obeyed the law? “He who breaks the least bit of the law shall not be of the Kingdom”. He also said “think not that I have come to do away with the law of the prophets, but I have come to enhance strengthen that”. Mohammed preached the same message. He preached like all the other prophets “One God”. No mythology , no son, no daughter, no father or mother. Just One God. You choose to follow Paul, wha had never met Jesus in his life. Paul who preached a religion opposite of Jesus and all the other prophets. You are not even circumcised. You eat Swine, that has been forbidden in all the scriptures. Jesus would never eat swine. You worship three gods and call it One. You worship Jesus, who is a creature himself. You worship his mother, you worship the cross. When the Bible says clearly “Do not make images”. You worship idols.

[@hamed100]

@Lionel Proctor Christians have always treated the Jewish Nation with contempt in the past. Only in recent times they now come to champion the Israeli Zionism so much so that they completely ignore the cruelty mated out by these Zionists onto the Palestinian people, the original people of Palestine and what is now called Israel. No Christian would claim the Jews were the chosen people of God only a hundred years ago. But the Quran has actually stated this in it’s pages. The Jews have always found sanctuary in Islamic lands. My point is that: Christianity has always been changing its own theology. From Jew haters they’ve become Jew lovers. From worshipping the One True God they changed to three from the fourth century onwards. How can they forsake the teachings of all the Prophets before Jesus and start not following the Law? “The Law is a curse” said Paul. Jesus said!!! “Many will come to me on that day saying “Lord Lord, did we not do all good works in your name? “ and I will say “Begone, for I do not know you” He will be referring to those who call themselves Christians, those who call Jesus Lord

[@SuperOpenminded]

Dear brother Paul. I was born Muslim and I like to read about Islam and comparative religion,. And I am amazed at how God has opened your mm is md nd heart. May God bless you . You style is classy ,respectful and enlightening

[@sandraalmonte6449]

You copyright the bible

[@MoroccanARROWS]

(Continuing..) *Sourate Yunus, Aya 36-41* وَمَا يَتَّبِعُ أَكۡثَرُهُمۡ إِلَّا ظَنًّاۚ إِنَّ ٱلظَّنَّ لَا يُغۡنِي مِنَ ٱلۡحَقِّ شَيۡـًٔاۚ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ عَلِيمُۢ بِمَا يَفۡعَلُونَ (Dr. Mustafa Khattab) Most of them follow nothing but ˹inherited˺ assumptions. ˹And˺ surely assumptions can in no way replace the truth. Allah is indeed All-Knowing of what they do. (Sahih International) And most of them follow not except assumption. Indeed, assumption avails not against the truth at all. Indeed, Allah is Knowing of what they do. وَمَا كَانَ هَٰذَا ٱلۡقُرۡءَانُ أَن يُفۡتَرَىٰ مِن دُونِ ٱللَّهِ وَلَٰكِن تَصۡدِيقَ ٱلَّذِي بَيۡنَ يَدَيۡهِ وَتَفۡصِيلَ ٱلۡكِتَٰبِ لَا رَيۡبَ فِيهِ مِن رَّبِّ ٱلۡعَٰلَمِينَ (Dr. Mustafa Khattab) It is not ˹possible˺ for this Quran to have been produced by anyone other than Allah. In fact, it is a confirmation of what came before, and an explanation of the Scripture. It is, without a doubt, from the Lord of all worlds. (Sahih International) And it was not [possible] for this Qur'an to be produced by other than Allah, but [it is] a confirmation of what was before it and a detailed explanation of the [former] Scripture, about which there is no doubt, from the Lord of the worlds. أَمۡ يَقُولُونَ ٱفۡتَرَىٰهُۖ قُلۡ فَأۡتُواْ *بِسُورَةٖ مِّثۡلِهِۦ* وَٱدۡعُواْ مَنِ ٱسۡتَطَعۡتُم مِّن دُونِ ٱللَّهِ إِن كُنتُمۡ صَٰدِقِينَ (Dr. Mustafa Khattab) Or do they claim, “He made it up!”? Tell them ˹O Prophet˺, “Produce one sûrah like it then, and seek help from whoever you can-other than Allah-if what you say is true!” (Sahih International) Or do they say [about the Prophet], "He invented it?" Say, "Then bring forth a surah like it and call upon [for assistance] whomever you can besides Allah, if you should be truthful." بَلۡ كَذَّبُواْ بِمَا لَمۡ يُحِيطُواْ بِعِلۡمِهِۦ وَلَمَّا يَأۡتِهِمۡ تَأۡوِيلُهُۥۚ كَذَٰلِكَ كَذَّبَ ٱلَّذِينَ مِن قَبۡلِهِمۡۖ فَٱنظُرۡ كَيۡفَ كَانَ عَٰقِبَةُ ٱلظَّٰلِمِينَ (Dr. Mustafa Khattab) In fact, they ˹hastily˺ rejected the Book without comprehending it and before the fulfilment of its warnings. Similarly, those before them were in denial. See then what was the end of the wrongdoers! (Sahih International) Rather, they have denied that which they encompass not in knowledge and whose interpretation has not yet come to them. Thus did those before them deny. Then observe how was the end of the wrongdoers. وَمِنۡهُم مَّن يُؤۡمِنُ بِهِۦ وَمِنۡهُم مَّن لَّا يُؤۡمِنُ بِهِۦۚ وَرَبُّكَ أَعۡلَمُ بِٱلۡمُفۡسِدِينَ (Dr. Mustafa Khattab) Some of them will ˹eventually˺ believe in it; others will not. And your Lord knows best the corruptors. (Sahih International) And of them are those who believe in it, and of them are those who do not believe in it. And your Lord is most knowing of the corrupters وَإِن كَذَّبُوكَ فَقُل لِّي عَمَلِي وَلَكُمۡ عَمَلُكُمۡۖ أَنتُم بَرِيٓـُٔونَ مِمَّآ أَعۡمَلُ وَأَنَا۠ بَرِيٓءٞ مِّمَّا تَعۡمَلُونَ (Dr. Mustafa Khattab) If they deny you, then say, “My deeds are mine and your deeds are yours. You are free of what I do and I am free of what you do!” (Sahih International) And if they deny you, [O Muhammad], then say, "For me are my deeds, and for you are your deeds. You are disassociated from what I do, and I am disassociated from what you do." *Sourate Al-Qasas, Aya 48-50* فَلَمَّا جَآءَهُمُ ٱلۡحَقُّ مِنۡ عِندِنَا قَالُواْ لَوۡلَآ أُوتِيَ مِثۡلَ مَآ أُوتِيَ مُوسَىٰٓۚ أَوَلَمۡ يَكۡفُرُواْ بِمَآ أُوتِيَ مُوسَىٰ مِن قَبۡلُۖ قَالُواْ سِحۡرَانِ تَظَٰهَرَا وَقَالُوٓاْ إِنَّا بِكُلّٖ كَٰفِرُونَ (Dr. Mustafa Khattab) But when the truth came to them from Us, they said, “If only he was given the like of what Moses had been given.” Did they not deny what had been given to Moses earlier? They claimed, “Both ˹Scriptures˺ are works of magic, supporting each other!” Adding, “We truly deny both.” (Sahih International) But when the truth came to them from Us, they said, "Why was he not given like that which was given to Moses?" Did they not disbelieve in that which was given to Moses before? They said, "[They are but] two works of magic supporting each other, and indeed we are, in both, disbelievers." قُلۡ فَأۡتُواْ بِكِتَٰبٖ مِّنۡ عِندِ ٱللَّهِ هُوَ أَهۡدَىٰ مِنۡهُمَآ أَتَّبِعۡهُ إِن كُنتُمۡ صَٰدِقِينَ (Dr. Mustafa Khattab) Say, ˹O Prophet,˺ “Bring then a scripture from Allah which is a better guide than these two so I may follow it, if your claim is true.” (Sahih International) Say, "Then bring a scripture from Allah which is more guiding than either of them that I may follow it, if you should be truthful." فَإِن لَّمۡ يَسۡتَجِيبُواْ لَكَ فَٱعۡلَمۡ أَنَّمَا يَتَّبِعُونَ أَهۡوَآءَهُمۡۚ وَمَنۡ أَضَلُّ مِمَّنِ ٱتَّبَعَ هَوَىٰهُ بِغَيۡرِ هُدٗى مِّنَ ٱللَّهِۚ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ لَا يَهۡدِي ٱلۡقَوۡمَ ٱلظَّٰلِمِينَ (Dr. Mustafa Khattab) So if they fail to respond to you, then know that they only follow their desires. And who could be more astray than those who follow their desires with no guidance from Allah? Surely Allah does not guide the wrongdoing people. (Sahih International) But if they do not respond to you - then know that they only follow their [own] desires. And who is more astray than one who follows his desire without guidance from Allah ? Indeed, Allah does not guide the wrongdoing people.

[@aq7705]

You could add your own ideas n opinions as well as reading from other books. Also, perhaps a series of 4-5 vids on each book, for a bit more depth.

[@BloggingTheology]

I’m not a scholar so my opinions are just my feelings.

[@Golha2505]

@@BloggingTheology respect to you sir ! Not many speakers (even arab) are aware of the fact that opinions in islam must come from people with the status of at least a well known scholar. Maybe you may talk about it in a future video ?

[@MoroccanARROWS]

@@BloggingTheology Thank u Sir for your statement..

[@MoroccanARROWS]

If only Muslims could be aware of that fact.. it is all about revelation not their own points of view ! We should learn only from trustworthy scholars. As Ibn Seereen says: "The knowledge (of hadith a d in the same manner all other religious subjects) are included in the deen. Therefore before acquiring knowledge, be aware from whom knowledge is acquired".

[@facts.explained.]

Short and to the point. Good one.

[@arthurmorgan4942]

Salam brother paul. How did your channel blow up so fast ( not in the terrorist way). I obviously been following you before you even had a channel but I believe I was one of your first subscribers.

[@BloggingTheology]

I don’t know how it blew up 💣

[@richadamayanti9809]

@@BloggingTheology because those hearts that seek for the truth they ll also look for you (in more knowledge way).thank you

[@alisikander]

@Jack Wiliam move on from this attitude to be able to accept guidance from Allah.

[@scriptkiddie1614]

Jazakha Allahu Khair akhi , from Italy .😊

[@BloggingTheology]

Salam from London

[@irawanaulia1966]

Love his concise and clear explanation...👍👍

[@wazirnasir420]

I dont believe You speak so clear and explain everything Very clear You are good

[@niZSonovski]

finally I found my language subtitle. Thx a lot sir 🤗

[@cool92guy]

EXCELLENT.....

[@BloggingTheology]

Thank you!

[@zainababdulaziz7097]

Currently reading that translation. Really love it!

[@hopefaith7076]

Nope, the truth is the Bible is closer to events. Thus, gives a closer picture of the character instead of coming in some cases 1,200 years later. The Qur’an comes later and adds legendary material from Jewish commentaries and Christian legends. Namely seven sleepers ect.

[@ashahadalmuthaab793]

Thank you Paul for all the great work you do to reveal the truth

[@hafeezmohd3469]

I pray to god give you hidayah..ameen..u are a good man..

[@SAJEDMUNIR]

You remind me of my old teacher Abu talha Dawud Burbank, he was soft spoken like yourself and was concise in his studies

[@xmuhmd]

I like that you keep it precise and short. This will make more people watch it 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼

[@ahmedjamals]

How much do you read daily... Just curious :)

[@BloggingTheology]

too much

[@hamzaabbas2711]

صلی اللّٰہ علیہ وآلہ وسلم علیہ السلام سلام اللہ علیہا رضی اللہ تعالیٰ اجمعین رحمت اللہ thank you for this video very informative brother keep up the good work mashAllah Islam ideology or may I say religion never calm to be a new ideology or may I say religion good thing is no individuals can't change the history but the worst thing is individuals could manipulate the history but couldn't change it so now and always will be up to individuals to research by themselves without being biased towards any ideology or may I say religion like always all the best to Muslim and atheism love from Pakistan 🇵🇰🤝🇬🇪

[@luminous6810]

Sound issues has improved thank you, you have considered our issue. And Quran know numbers.Bible doesn't know numbers every son bible says first born David ephram Solomon Adam jesus every son is first born then who is second begotten son.

[@Infidelx]

The Quran revealed to Muhammad is a completion to the gospel revealed to Christ, the Torahs revealed to Moses, Talmud revealed to dawood and the scriptures revealed to Abraham.

[@Z781-y2r]

You muslims are not worshipping the God of Abraham

[@NeoLegendX]

How would the prophet a.s. Translate the hieroglyphs which later translations of them proved the stories correct? Not just hieroglyphs, but the other languages? People are panicking because it just shows just how much altered the bible is.

[@nho2x113]

Hieroglyphs?

[@NeoLegendX]

@@nho2x113 Check it out

[@NeoLegendX]

@Hamza Akram kzbin.info/www/bejne/j3S1aaiKipJka9E

[@NeoLegendX]

@Hamza Akram you expected me to post you documents? Here of all places?

[@NeoLegendX]

@Hamza Akram well you can find that in books that are hundreds of pages long. However you'd have to pay for it.

[@sufyanbs]

It`s like an analogy of two individuals sitting for an examination. One is accused of copying from the other. But the accused scores 100% and the other just fails the examination.

[@delpthepath127]

Anything to make yourself feel better 😂

[@atifhusain1]

The Quran is the only text that has and will be preserved in its original form thanks to the mercy of the Almighty Creator, the ability to memorize it completely.

[@kellsAC1]

What separates you from other speakers on Islam is your sheer knowledge. You are very well read and articulate .

[@muslimguardian6514]

Asalamualikum brother, nice work.

[@BloggingTheology]

Thanks and welcome

[@braveheart621]

In Islamic faith foundamentals there is nothing called "The original sin" Adam disobeyed by own choice, he asked forgivness and was forgiven. Human beings had obviously to face their destintiny, using all the gifts from Allah, not in paradise but through a tough living on Earth.

[@adam1is1]

This is an amazing Channel.

[@Go-fb3ge]

إذا وجدوا في القرآن شيئاً موافقاً لما عندهم في كتبهم المقدسة قالوا: نبيكم سرق من عندنا، وإذا وجدوا فيه ما يخالف، قالوا: نبيكم جاهل بالحقائق. لا يرضون بشيء. ولم يفهموا بعد أن أنبياءهم هم أيضاً أنبياؤنا إلا أن القرآن لم يشوّه سيرتهم شرّ التشويه كما فعلت كتبهم المقدسة بهم!

[@erykind2286]

*ALHAMDULILLAH FOR THE SUBTITLES*

[@algedafiabdullah6701]

Greetings from Libya to you doctor

[@ojekoplek9784]

Assalamualaikum brother... Yeah.. I like the end of the video.. Very short without 'please subscribe'... until next time. 😁👍👍👍👍

[@paidikulinerbocah6685]

Terima kasih, akhirnya saya temukan subtitel Bahasa Indonesai🙏

[@FAB962]

You are doing a brilliant job.

[@abdirashidmohamedhersi4603]

Excellent point thank you very much Greeting from Edmonton Canada

[@BloggingTheology]

Glad it was helpful!

[@teachmetheway7081]

Quran (56: 63-64): Then tell Me about the seed that you sow in the ground. Is it you that make it grow, or are We the Grower? 1 Corinthians 3:7: So neither he who plants nor he who waters is anything, but only God, who makes things grow.

[@iamanazarene9046]

i see similarities

[@Name-xx9yx]

Dude chapter 63 only has 11 verses and this verse does not exist in Quran..

[@teachmetheway7081]

@@Name-xx9yx thank you very much. i edited the comment. Quran 56:63-64

[@matthewn2559]

@@teachmetheway7081 Thanks for standing up for Christ! It is encouraging.

[@truthchannel5285]

plsams 12 :6. The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. 7. Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever. 8. The wicked walk on every side, when the vilest men are exalted.

[@adminscamp2563]

"Deaf, dumb and blind. So they will not return" (Quran 2:18)

[@user-ox1mv7bw3u]

Great content, thank you 😊 👍👍

[@BloggingTheology]

Glad you enjoyed it

[@mahmoudbadr1914]

Interesting point is that not only that the Jews knew it ( some of their leader embraced Islam), but the story you refferred to "Moses and Khidr" was revealed after the Jews challenged prophet Mohamed to know (asking God) what happened to Moses with that man (along with two other challenges revealed in the same chapter -Kahf) So even those who doubted that he may have some knowledge of their scriptures, they assumed he'd failed the mission, becuase simply it was not there. Only their supreme leader could tell. So, when this story was revealed in the Quran they kept silent. Christians as well had similar incident with the prophet in which the prophet called them to gather on a day, all of them and all of Muslims to be together praying to God at the same time invoking God's curse to fall upon whatever party is the true liar, fake believers. None of them showed up, for the leaders knew what was coming.. and this incident was also documented in the Quran.

[@mahadahmedbaloch]

Interesting

[@qomarqomarudin7307]

Thanks a lot sir .. I would also like to advise you on the physical phenomenon both in Bible and Al Qur’an vs. modern science .. you would probably be amazed .. anyway I am just an ordinary learner and there is no mean or whatsoever that I am expert on that issues .. Again many thanks and have a safe day .. God bless you .. and sorry I just joined your channel once it came across to me

[@BloggingTheology]

Welcome aboard

[@qomarqomarudin7307]

Just a token appreciation .. I will not skip any advertisements on your channel

[@AS-jj4dv]

Islam is a syncretic religion: syncretism is the blending of two or more religious belief systems into a new system, or the incorporation into a religious tradition of beliefs from unrelated traditions. This happens quite commonly in regions where multiple religious traditions exist in proximity and function actively in a culture, or when a culture is conquered, and the conquerors bring their religious beliefs with them, but failed in entirely eradicating the old beliefs or (especially) practices. The quran is not a revelation of god but a combination and fusion of different religions. Islam has taken very much from the practices and narratives of judaism, christianity, zoroastrianism and other polytheistic religions known at that time (7-9th centuries). A good example of pagan practices in islam is the kissing and touching of the black stone! The quran and islam are full of fairy tales, stories, gossips, and mythical figures from the bible and christian traditions, such as satan making eve to eat the fruit, not eating pork, ibrahim’s sacrifice, lot and fire in sodom, moses raised by the daughter of the pharaoh, the story of the burning bush, the plagues in egypt and the exit of the jews, the murmurs in the desert, aaron's golden calf, jesus and jesus stories, and so on…. Islam is definitively not an original religion.

[@SayedI313]

Here's your short and concise answer: NO

[@fearnonebutone4977]

I met with Dr. Mustafa Khattab, the author of the Clear Quran. I was invited by him to speak at Anatolia Mosque in Mississauga. The translation is quite good, especially for non-Muslims and new Muslims. However, the translation by Dr. Abdulilaah Lahmami from the UK is a bit more precise. The Hilali/Khan translation has been recommended by the Ulema.

[@chooba7948]

Thank you for the clarifications and let me add some big others differences between the Bible and the coran : The anthropomorphic representation of God in the Bible is very contested in the Coran. God is not human like or anything else like (there is nothing like him). God can not get tired or rest or forget in the Coran in response to the Bible. The notion of 6 days of creations is not linked to the days of the week like in the Bible it refers to periods. Angels don't have will and can't disobey to God like in the Bible. They can't be tempted by women like in the Bible. There is no mention of Jinn in the Bible. And Satan is their ancestor. He is not an angel who disobeys in the Coran. The essential role of the prophets in the Coran is to call people to worship one God and good behave. It's not like that in the old testament. God is not mentioned or rarerly in whole books of the Bible. All the Coran is about him. There is rarely mention of the judgement day or the heavens and hells in the Bible. The Bible it self never claimed that it's the book of God. The Coran clearly does. There is no poetry or vocalisation of the textes of the Bible. The Coran is very prude and bashfull regarding to the sex subjects. It always uses metaphors to speak about it. Not in the Bible. There is always a moral in the stories of the Coran. It's not the case in the Bible and some stories are clearly immorals. And i certainly forget many others differences

[@Dani-zg7fr]

Great

[@iamanazarene9046]

This shows that you haven't read the bible in context and your statements are mere copy and paste arguments.

[@chooba7948]

@@iamanazarene9046 I'm sorry to disappoint you. Not only i read it but i read the apocryphal scriptures too and some others texts about it. For the Coran i almost memorised it. And so you remind me another difference : The hole coran is easy to memorise. There are millions who did it all around the word. Can you say the same for the Bible or make it simple for the new testament ?!

[@iamanazarene9046]

@@chooba7948 That's good to know you have memorised the Quran. Well done! I would encourage you to memorise the Torah and the Gospels. It'll help you to understand everything context.

[@chooba7948]

@@iamanazarene9046 Your are the Christian here so it's on you to memorize your books. I told you it's clearly impossible to memorize all the Bible. I read about pastor Andy Davis who memorized about 42 books but he can't remember the old books memorized. I'am not judging here i'am just noticing differences. There is explanations of this difference in momorization. But the subject here is that the Coran is not copied from the Bible. Even the stories of the prophets are clairely different in large parts. It's not about understanding the Bible or it's context.

[@tahirnectar1275]

Needing Composure? *Problem; Within the following passage, the Bible clearly errs in stating that God rests.* “By the seventh day God had finished the work he had been doing; so on the seventh day he rested from all his work. And God blessed the seventh day and made it holy, because on it he rested from all the work of creating that he had done” (Genesis 2:2). Bible narrators took the idea that God rested further still when they wrote as follows: “In six days the Lord made heaven and earth, and on the seventh day he rested, and was refreshed” (Exodus 31: 17) According to the Quran, God does not display any human attributes of weakness or fatigue, and hence, does not need rest. This false claim of God needing rest is corrected in God’s own words when God declared: “And verily we created the heavens and the earth and all that is between them in six periods, and naught of weariness touched us” (Quran 50:38). According to the Holy Quran, the Final Testament, God does not get tired “Neither slumber nor sleep overtakes Him” (Quran 2:255).

[@dennylib1]

Are u kidding there are lot of human attributes given to Allah.

[@dasdas1970]

How pity most (almost) of my friends doesnt know English and they can hear and understand you. Subtitles needed!

[@nathannate6817]

the subtitles are available already brother

[@ibrahim187]

Quran 48:2 prophets were not infallible of sin. Just to clarifie that. They were humans who did there share of mistakes. Plus God reprimended the prophet muhammad in a verse because he forbade something that God never autorised him to forbid to please a wife. That's a sin. Prophets didnt sin at the extends of what is described in the bible or what the average joe does. But still, they were humans never to be idolised. And adam sinned by disobeing God too. And moses who accidently killed somebody and said it was satan's doing and God forgave him

[@tuckercoffin2164]

Hell no. Mohamad had no idea what Christianity was about.

[@tuckercoffin2164]

@@HilyahAsSalaf Anyone can say such nonsense.

[@mahadahmedbaloch]

@@tuckercoffin2164 Lmao dodging a bullet like a pro

[@tuckercoffin2164]

@@mahadahmedbaloch I am god’s prophet. Do not lean on your understanding but follow me. See? I can say such nonsense too. Mohamad got so many things wrong lmao. Do you know Isa? His name comes from Yeshuha which means “YHWH saves”. Do you know Elijah the prophet? His name means “YHWH is God”. Mohammad had no idea about this and he denied that his imaginary God’s name is YHWH.

[@mahadahmedbaloch]

@@tuckercoffin2164 😂 He never gave god a name Allah is just the arabic word for “god”

[@tuckercoffin2164]

@@mahadahmedbaloch exactly? Why did he corrupt the Bible? Jews, Christians and Moses knew God’s name to be YHWH. Jesus and Elijah have the word “YHWH” in them. These prophets even are in the Quran. Kinda weird. If God is not YHWH, then the Quran is corrupted. If he is, then why is it never mentioned?

[@jeanetienne8039]

Paul: As I’m sure you are aware (but don’t wish to point out), the miracles of Jesus which are in the Quran but not in the Bible are actually found in the Infancy Gospel of Thomas. So they weren’t stories that were lost or unknown until Mohammed’s time, they just weren’t accepted as being worthy of inclusion in the canon of the New Testament.

[@yasminee52]

That doesn’t deny nor Neglect the fact that The Quran comes from The Lord of the Worlds.

[@shahid8545]

Islam is likely one of the most misunderstood things in the entire world.

[@BloggingTheology]

No THE most misunderstood thing of all

[@d10srelish40]

it is even misunderstood by its followers .

[@shahid8545]

@@d10srelish40 By many yes.

[@shahid8545]

@@BloggingTheology Indeed.

[@shahid8545]

It just doesn't stop.☝🏽☝🏽☝🏽☝🏽 🤦‍♂️

[@ashifhassan1148]

The worst thing about the bible is that it portrays the prophets as sinful. When reading biblical stories, the reader would think some prophets are immoral and barbaric. I cannot comprehend with the accusations against the prophets by the biblical narrative. Its very low and degrading.

[@iamanazarene9046]

Prophets can be immoral if they choose to act away from God's message. All prophets are at risk of making immoral mistakes since they are humans.

[@ashifhassan1148]

@@iamanazarene9046 I dont know whether you understand the faults in your statement. Gods message was not given to some random persons to convey his message. He chose certain individuals from the humans for recieving his revelation. God wouldn't choose anyone who will act against his will. Because if the receiver acts against Gods message then logically speaking it doesn't make sense. The prophets are role models for other humans and by default they should be of highly moral character. That means they cannot act against Gods will. But they can make mistakes. But committing incest, fornication, killing of innocents, consumption of intoxicants are out of boundaries that no prophet can do while receiving revelation.

[@iamanazarene9046]

@@ashifhassan1148 You haven't read the story of Prophet Jonah from the Jewish bible not the story from the Quran. God spoke to Jonah to go to Nineveh but he refused and went away. Isn't that disobeying God, going against God's will. Jonah chose to do by his human will and because of his action his journey is met with a lot of troubles and gets swallowed by the whale. Jonah seeks repents to God for disobeying and 3 das later the whale spits him out and Jonah makes his way to Nineveh to tell the people what God has told him.

[@ashifhassan1148]

@@iamanazarene9046 My friend haven't you read my whole reply. Prophets can make mistakes. Prophet Jonah (PBUH) conveyed the message from Allah to his people and his people rejected him. As time passed away he had lost hope in them and he left them without Allah's permission. And made a mistake. But he repented for that mistake. But this act cannot be equate with prophets committing incest, fornication and killing of innocents. Two of them fall apart. Its not fair to compare the two. One is very immoral and degrading but the other one is not. Thats what I am talking about.

[@Z781-y2r]

@@ashifhassan1148 Im not telling here the things your prophets have committed 😂

[@shaggyvillage6960]

Can you Also make a Video about Jerusalem why is it important for all the Abrahamic Religions and what does the Quran say about Jerusalem

[@marsolo1193]

If you understand arabic i have a beautiful video for you from a palestenian cheikh who explain the importance of jeruselam.

[@shaggyvillage6960]

@@marsolo1193 send it to me brother

[@sherifel-hadi3439]

Great you brought up the story of David. I read it was a punishable crime to narrate the biblical account of David PBUH at the time of the Rashidun caliphs.

[@BloggingTheology]

I did not know that.

[@Q8ijin]

To the point 🎯

[@donthomson10]

*لا إله إلا ﷲ* *لا إله إلا ﷲ* *لا إله إلا ﷲ* *لا إله إلا ﷲ* *محمد رسول ﷲ*

[@jjhhhhwyshs9381]

No it's not. They both are from Allah along with the Torah. But the Bible and Torah were tampered with and the Quran is safe

[@saukibasya]

Did you translate the title to Bahasa Indonesia by yourself, Sir? I'm curious because I'm Indonesian. Thank you very much for your great videos.

[@delcior]

I love your voice

[@postman77]

The Prophet (ﷺ) returned to Khadija while his heart was beating rapidly. She took him to Waraqa bin Naufal who was a Christian convert and used to READ the GOSPELS IN ARABIC... Sahih al-Bukhari 3392, Book 60, Hadith 66

[@cash2678]

Mashallah, you know the truth.

[@EndanSuwandana]

A very concise, crystal clear, and undeniable conlusion...

[@thursoberwick1948]

How is it undeniable? Mohammed lived hundreds of years after Jesus, in an area near to Palestine, and spoke a related language.

[@khalidcompany7717]

Salute Stay bless always Ameen

[@jarlprae9475]

There are too many names and stories in common which predate the Quran for it to have a source outside of the scriptures already in print. Since very few people could read and write at this time including Mohamed (pbuh), this information would more than likely be from oral tradition. Since all Semites descend from Shem and to be more specific, those Semites who are descendants of Ishmael, there's good reason why Abrahamic faiths have similar accounts. Trying to sell it as an unrelated and unique "divine revelation" is risky, at best.

[@majidbenyounes9008]

Outstanding!!

[@Zenfoni]

Surah Al-Maidah Verses 82-85 (5:82) Of all men you will find the Jews and those who associate others with Allah in His divinity to be the most hostile to those who believe; and you will surely find that of all people they who say: 'We are Christians', are closest to feeling affection for those who believe. This is because there are devoted priests and monks among them, and because they are not arrogant. (5:83)And when they hear what has been revealed to the Messenger you see that their eyes overflow with tears because of the Truth that they recognize and they say: 'Our Lord! We do believe; write us down, therefore, with those who bear witness (to the Truth). (5:84) And why should we not believe in Allah and the Truth which has come down to us when we do fervently desire that our Lord include us among the righteous?' (5:85) So Allah rewarded them for these words with Gardens beneath which rivers flow so that they would abide there for ever. Such is the reward of the people who do good.

[@fatahsambo2336]

I Always Enjoy listening to Your Analysis and Indepth Thought, Thank you Paul. May Allaah Guide Us, Amen

[@amsyar4223]

The answer is no, Quran didnt copy any bible. It is the law of God, surely there is some common terms

[@Z781-y2r]

It is copied

[@thursoberwick1948]

It is hundreds of years newer than the Bible.

[@rashid4682]

Mashallah great job you have done very beautiful reply to christian apologists 👍👍👍

[@cymoonazics4940]

Very easy to and straightforward answer without all the “”buts”, in most of the answers given by opposing apologists to verify their beliefs.

[@mohamedshahidhussain586]

Plz increase your Voice in coming videos...

[@7164227]

True a better mic would be nice. I can’t hear him when I’m at the gym.

[@inongbalee3092]

Let's buy him a propher Mic setup.. But I don't know his address

[@nathannate6817]

or you can use the subtitles . easy

[@Khaledf]

Use headphones.

[@mightbyson]

So if I make up a book with the same characters (Abraham, Joseph, Moses, Jesus..etc), but with less details, with my own different view, does this make it from the same divine source? Bear in mind that some characters have no historical proof of existence, especially Joseph who was a minister in Egypt. I am Egyptian, we studied the history of ancient Egypt in school, and Joseph was never there (in such a Muslim country, they would celebrate his existence in history). Moreover, I have never seen any mention of him in the museums I visited.

[@mightbyson]

@@scoops2382 Yes, it's full of baseless stories like the bible. All respect to Ireland; would love to visit it one day.

[@mightbyson]

@@nho2x113 We know all the dynasties. Where did you get this percentage from? How do you say 30% if you don't know what 100% is?

[@ahmedosky1000]

Im really exciting about you. Why yur video looks like help islam from many detraction even in fact yur not a muslim? #peace

[@standbyevidence1]

He a Muslim..

[@Megaspinosaurusrex]

@Patricia Hill what the heck are you writing so kind of fan fiction, because it doesn't look promising

[@boyan619]

Nay, We fling (send down) the truth (this Qur'ân) against the falsehood (disbelief), so it destroys it, and behold, it (falsehood) is vanished. And woe to you for that (lie) which you ascribe (to Allâh by uttering that Allâh has a wife and a son). (18) Such are they whom Allâh has cursed, so that He has made them deaf and blinded their sight. (23) Do they not then think deeply in the Qur'ân, or are their hearts locked up (from understanding it)? (24)

[@regretlater929]

Now that we cleared about the quran, how about the bible itself? Were there anyone questioning of the bible copied from any earlier scripture? I'm not trying to score any point here, just being curious.

[@teachmetheway7081]

Quran 3:160 If God supports you, there is none who can overcome you... Romans 8:31 What shall we then say to these things? If God be for us, who can be against us?

[@matthewn2559]

Are you a christian?

[@shahidmiah917]

If it was copied surely the Quran would have copied the contradictions of the Bible too. This did not happen, miraculously the Quran only contains the parts of the Bible that are genuine.

[@onemuslim9313]

Short answer : No Long answer : Nooooooooooooooo