Was there ever any country called Bharat? Bharat v/s India Controversy I INDIAN HISTORY

[@shivajinavale6549]

जंबुद्विपे, भारत वर्षे ll

[@vishnukumaragarwal9293]

बिषणु पुराण और अन्य सभी पुराण आज से लगभग 1500 साल पहेले लिखे गए थें। वेदांत और उपनिशद और बालमिकि रामायण और गीता मे कही भी नही होता। हिंदु, हिन्दी, हिंदुस्थान तीनो फारसी भाषा के शब्द है जो लगभग 1000 साल पहेले मुस्लिम अपने साथ भारत मे लाए जहा सनातन धरमी समाज रहता था। इंडिया नाम गीरिक शब्द Indo के शब्द से आए।

[@jimutabahansunani4093]

यदा यदा ही धर्मस्य ग्लानि भबती BHARAT... BHARAT. BHARAT, has been mentioned in the GITA.

[@bodhisattvavaani]

वेदों में सप्त हिंदू शब्द नहीं है

[@devendrakumarrai6873]

नहीं भारत नहीं केवल मुकेशिया और पुनिसिया देश के अतिरिक्त कुछ था ही नहीं।जय हो चपटानंद धरती बहादुर?

[@SKmandal-q7m]

😂😂

[@SKmandal-q7m]

सही बोले भाई 😅

[@kripashankeryadav225]

आप दोनों लोगो को नमस्कार और धन्यवाद।

[@nareshpaswan5505]

हम भारत के लोग @ we the people of India 😊😊

[@ajayshrimali5658]

100 बात की एक बात, बीजेपी हटाओ देश बचाओ

[@test-ws7sg]

Bhai bjp, bajrang dal,vhp etc ko hata ya ban kar kuch nahi hone wala. Jab bjp nahi thi tab saare sanghi to Congress me hi thi. Chalo rss ko bhi ban kar dogey to kya apko lagta hai ye sab band ho jayega? Kya apko lagta hai 2014 me log achanak se communal ho gaye, mob lynchings karne lage? Logo ke dilo me nafrat/hinsa aur doglapan hamesha thi, pahle khul kar nahi bolte the, lekin sonch aur bartao Aisa hi tha. 2014 ke baad modi ne aise logo ko ye azaadi di ki aap kuch boliye, kuch nhi kijiye, aap par koi karwai nahi hogi. Abhi jaroorat hai ki logo ke dimaag aur dilo me gandagi hai usko saaf karne ki.

[@KavendraSingh-yg8xe]

मनुस्मृति में आर्यावर्त की सीमाओं का वर्णन है। वेदों में किसी राजा का इतिहास नहीं है। भारत शब्द पहली बार गीता में मिलता है।

[@pramendrakumaryadav9240]

एक बात तो अकाट्य है कि हमारी पहचान सिंधु(Indus)से है।लेकिन कोई भी धर्म के गुंडे चाहे हिंदू हो मुस्लिम हो,ईसाई हो,सिख हो बौद्ध हो,जैन हो ,अपनी ऐतिहासिक जड़ो को सैंधव जनों से नहीं जोड़ते,सबने अपने अलग अलग भारत बना रखे हैं।कोई भी नही कहता कि हम भारतीय महान सैंधव सभ्यता के वारिस है।ऐसा कहने से ,बाहर से आये आक्रांताओं के धर्म की पोल पट्टी खुल जायेगी।लेकिन अब ज्यादा दिन तक ये नहीं चलेगा,अब भरतजन जाग रहे है,और खुलकर कह रहे है,हम महान सैंधव सभ्यता के निर्माताओं के वंशज है,चाहे वो सामान्य वर्ग के हो,या ओबीसी यस सी यस टी वर्ग के हो।

[@सावित्रीदेवीठाकुर]

"भारत" को स्वीकृति संविधान ने "INDIA" के पर्याय के रुप में दी है।साथ ही वे पुस्तकें जिनके शीर्षक अंग्रेजी में इंडिया शब्द है, उनके हिंदी अनुवाद में भारत शब्द का शीर्षक के रुप में प्रयोग किया गया।

[@rocketsinghism]

बेहद सार्थक विश्लेषण!!

[@sangeetakarki1525]

I born in India i.e. bharat. Would like to die in India i.e. bharat. I love my India, my bharat

[@ravipd3812]

सिर्फ शिक्षित व्यक्तियों के लिए 4500 years ago- Meluhha -by Elamite king 2500 years ago - Hind - by Persian emperor Darius 2300 years ago - India - by greek visitor Megasthenes 2200 years ago - Jambudvip -by Buddhist king Ashoka 2100 years ago - Bharatvarsh - by Jain king Kharavela 2000 years ago -Aryavart - by Hindu in dharma shastra (ये सभी नाम सिर्फ उत्तर भारत के लिए थे)

[@ranveersen1576]

यह जानकारी 100% सही है

[@AAKASHH367]

👍

[@rajuolakiya3198]

South India ko kya kahte the?

[@RK-cq4nt]

Fantastic discussion. Thanks both of you Sir. Mr. Jinnah, father of Pakistan wanted the name 'India' should not be given to Hindustan. India was also their living symbol. Now we find that there are people in India who want to fulfil the wishes of Mr. Jinnah. If India is not Bharat, then Pakistan can adapt the name 'India is Pakistan'. Where we are moving?

[@SatpalVerma000]

India didn't exist before 1947. Italy didn't exist before 1860. Turkey didn't exist before 1914 and so on. Concept of Countries was invented in Europe in the 16th century. Before the invention of the concept of countries, there were only empires and kingdoms. Turkey was created after the fall of the Ottomans empire. Dozens of countries were created based on nationalities after the fall of the Ottomans empire. Italy was created in 1860 by merging various small kingdoms of Italian nationality. Similarly, Germany was created in 1871 by merging various small kingdoms of German nationality. Similarly, all European countries were created based on nationalities. Now the question is what is nation and nationality? A nation is a society that shares a common language, culture, and history and has shared interests. For example English, German, Italian, Turkish, French, Russian, Dutch, Spanish, Japanese, Korean, Punjabi, kashmiri, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Thai etc are nations and a country based on single nation or nationality is called a nation state. Most countries in Europe are based on single nationalities and are nation states or simply called nations. India was created out of the British Indian empire on the basis of two nations bogus theory. Two nations were assumed as Islam and hindusim. But in reality, Islam and Hinduism are not nations. A nation is a society that shares a common language, culture, and history and has shared interests. For example, English, French, Russian, Dutch, germans, Spanish, Japanese, Korean, Punjabi, kashmiri, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Thai etc are nations. There are dozens of nations within India and Pakistan. And hence India and Pakistan are union of nations or multinationalcountries. Nations are Punjab, Kashmir, sindh, Baluchistan, Gujarat, Bengal, Maharashtra, Tamilnadu etc. And in modern world countries are created on basis of nationality like the countries in Europe (England, France, Germany, Poland, Norway, Sweden, Croatia etc) or in Asia (Korea, Japan, China,Thailand, Philippines etc) and Bangladesh etc are countries based on nationalities. But India and Pakistan were not created based on nationalities but on two nation (Islam Hinduism) bogus theory. Hence, these countries are based on religions. Bangladesh was created on the basis of Bangla nationality in 1971.. Punjab should be a free country based on Punjabi nationality like Bangladesh. But Hindu Punjabis and Muslims punjabi don't want to leave india and Pakistan, so we Punjabi Sikhs can't force them to follow us. Hindu Punjabis, who had deserted Punjabi language in 1951 and 1961 census by declaring Hindi as their mother tongue would never support a Punjabi nation state. They support a Indian state based on the Hindu religion. Similarly, Punjabi Muslims of Pakistan dont support Punjabi nation state either. They support Pakistan state that is based on Islam religion. Similarly, Bengali Hindus don't support Bangla nation state Bangladesh and want to live in India which is based on Hinduism. So Punjabi muslims, Punjabi Hindus, and Bengali Hindus are free to stay in their respective countries based on religions. But similar to Bangla Muslims of East Pakistan, who created Bangla nation state Bangladesh without Indian Bengali Hindus, Sikhs have the right to create Azad Punjab (a Punjabi nation state) without Punjabi Hindus and Punjabi Muslims. As simple as that. We Punjabi Sikhs have no problem living in a Punjabi Muslims or Punjabi Hindu majority Punjabi nation state. The Punjabi speaker population of Muslims is around 10 crore. Punjabi speaking population of Hindus is around 3 crore (Punjabi Hindus in Punjab, Himchal, Haryana, Jammu and Delhi). Punjabi speaker Sikh population is around 2 crore. Hence Sikhs would be minority if both Punjabi muslims and Hindus or either one of them come form a Punjabi nation state with us Sikhs. But their radicals minds prefer religion over their nationality and they love to give up their Punjabi nationality and adopt Hindi and Urdu nationality in order to create a state based on their respective religions. So when Sikhs alone form a Punjabi nation state, it would automatically be a Sikh majority Punjabi nation state called Khalistan. What's in the name? You can name it whatever you want. But in practice it would be Khalistan just like India is a Hindu rashtra in practice regardless of its official name or regardless of its constitution..

[@krushbhat7929]

Bharat that is india not India that is bharat

[@Sammy-lv9iv]

​@@SatpalVerma000 Before Italy, There was a Roman Empire Before Iran, there was a Persian Empire Egypt emerged outta the Egyptian civilization India has emerged outta indus and vedic civilization China emerged out of chinese civilization Japan had emerged out of Japanese Turkey had emerged outta Byzantine and ottoman empire nd so on Prior to the idea of modern nation states and the national self-determination process existed the concept of civilization, empires and countries expanding in time and space, but still based and centred around a particular political centre giving it a form of national identity. Since such a country or an empire as big as a subcontinent incorporating various nationalities over time and space in various epochs, people inhabiting the regions eventually formed a nation in essence. Hence, the republic of India which was formed in 1947 was a nation by modern state definition, but as a civilization centred around the Indus and Ganges that developed, flourished and expanded over time and space, India had always constituted a nation in essence.

[@Sammy-lv9iv]

​@@SatpalVerma000 Modern nation state based on particular common culture, language, religion, history and ethnicity constitute a nationality, but still not a nation in essence. Nationalism is therefore an ideological construct used for the purpose of demarcating the political boundaries and giving international recognition to the existence of a nation through the concept of sovereignty. On the other hand, a civilization or country constituting a nation in essence was not an outcome of an ideological construction based on nationalism that's why Indian nationalism although an artificial construct was still used to unify the diverse elements of this country who always formed a nation in essence despite the diversity.

[@SatpalVerma000]

@Sammy-lv9iv not only that you are confused, but also make no sense. You are trying to impress me using the words and sentences that make no sense but in vain. And what's the point of repeating the things that I have already proven invalid? Empires got no significance in modern world. It doesn't matter whether Kashmir was part of Durrani empire or sikh empire or Asoka empire. It's a nation and got right to self determination. India is a colonial political entity based on British empire and created in 1947 based on two nation bogus theory. Punjab Kashmir nagaland Tamil nations don't share nothing. The colonial entity is just extension of British colonialism. And I don't have time to waste. If you got some meaningful to share, share it or use your time in learning and evolve.

[@rocketsinghism]

भारत नामक कोई देश कभी नहीं था, केवल एक भूभाग था!!!😊😅😅😮😢

[@shyamnandanmishra5212]

"INDICA" was written by Greek writer Megasthanes around the end of fourth century.

[@deshiboysdeshiboys8727]

Vote for INDIA Judega Bharat Jeetega INDIA Hume padha likha PM chahiye INDIA That is Bharat, Rajiv Gandhi ji Mera Bharat mahan Modi Meke in India, vote for INDIA

[@prashantnasery3041]

भाई ये राहुल गांधी जी कहां तक पढ़े लिखे हैं?

[@basudmaitra4568]

मेरा भारत महान And I am proud of being Indian

[@paradigmnnf]

... the only question is: what is the basis?

[@awadheshkumar6128]

@@paradigmnnf vo to nahi pata , bas itna pata ki 100 me 95 chor beiman fir bhi bharat mahan hai Aaj Tak 😐😇

[@SatpalVerma000]

India didn't exist before 1947. Italy didn't exist before 1860. Turkey didn't exist before 1914 and so on. Concept of Countries was invented in Europe in the 16th century. Before the invention of the concept of countries, there were only empires and kingdoms. Turkey was created after the fall of the Ottomans empire. Dozens of countries were created based on nationalities after the fall of the Ottomans empire. Italy was created in 1860 by merging various small kingdoms of Italian nationality. Similarly, Germany was created in 1871 by merging various small kingdoms of German nationality. Similarly, all European countries were created based on nationalities. Now the question is what is nation and nationality? A nation is a society that shares a common language, culture, and history and has shared interests. For example English, German, Italian, Turkish, French, Russian, Dutch, Spanish, Japanese, Korean, Punjabi, kashmiri, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Thai etc are nations and a country based on single nation or nationality is called a nation state. Most countries in Europe are based on single nationalities and are nation states or simply called nations. India was created out of the British Indian empire on the basis of two nations bogus theory. Two nations were assumed as Islam and hindusim. But in reality, Islam and Hinduism are not nations. A nation is a society that shares a common language, culture, and history and has shared interests. For example, English, French, Russian, Dutch, germans, Spanish, Japanese, Korean, Punjabi, kashmiri, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Thai etc are nations. There are dozens of nations within India and Pakistan. And hence India and Pakistan are union of nations or multinationalcountries. Nations are Punjab, Kashmir, sindh, Baluchistan, Gujarat, Bengal, Maharashtra, Tamilnadu etc. And in modern world countries are created on basis of nationality like the countries in Europe (England, France, Germany, Poland, Norway, Sweden, Croatia etc) or in Asia (Korea, Japan, China,Thailand, Philippines etc) and Bangladesh etc are countries based on nationalities. But India and Pakistan were not created based on nationalities but on two nation (Islam Hinduism) bogus theory. Hence, these countries are based on religions. Bangladesh was created on the basis of Bangla nationality in 1971.. Punjab should be a free country based on Punjabi nationality like Bangladesh. But Hindu Punjabis and Muslims punjabi don't want to leave india and Pakistan, so we Punjabi Sikhs can't force them to follow us. Hindu Punjabis, who had deserted Punjabi language in 1951 and 1961 census by declaring Hindi as their mother tongue would never support a Punjabi nation state. They support a Indian state based on the Hindu religion. Similarly, Punjabi Muslims of Pakistan dont support Punjabi nation state either. They support Pakistan state that is based on Islam religion. Similarly, Bengali Hindus don't support Bangla nation state Bangladesh and want to live in India which is based on Hinduism. So Punjabi muslims, Punjabi Hindus, and Bengali Hindus are free to stay in their respective countries based on religions. But similar to Bangla Muslims of East Pakistan, who created Bangla nation state Bangladesh without Indian Bengali Hindus, Sikhs have the right to create Azad Punjab (a Punjabi nation state) without Punjabi Hindus and Punjabi Muslims. As simple as that. We Punjabi Sikhs have no problem living in a Punjabi Muslims or Punjabi Hindu majority Punjabi nation state. The Punjabi speaker population of Muslims is around 10 crore. Punjabi speaking population of Hindus is around 3 crore (Punjabi Hindus in Punjab, Himchal, Haryana, Jammu and Delhi). Punjabi speaker Sikh population is around 2 crore. Hence Sikhs would be minority if both Punjabi muslims and Hindus or either one of them come form a Punjabi nation state with us Sikhs. But their radicals minds prefer religion over their nationality and they love to give up their Punjabi nationality and adopt Hindi and Urdu nationality in order to create a state based on their respective religions. So when Sikhs alone form a Punjabi nation state, it would automatically be a Sikh majority Punjabi nation state called Khalistan. What's in the name? You can name it whatever you want. But in practice it would be Khalistan just like India is a Hindu rashtra in practice regardless of its official name or regardless of its constitution....v

[@prabhakarss9266]

सतनाम तो है लेकिन सत्यता नहीं है

[@sharath515]

Bharatha varshe, Bharatha kande, jambu dweepe, , dandakaranye, godavaryah dakshine teere - is referenced in many of our prayers

[@shailendrajain7432]

भारतनामा पुस्तक भारतीय ज्ञानपीठ से प्रकाशित है आग्रह है अध्यन कर अनुग्रहीत करें.सादर

[@bhagatsinghpadvi9873]

It's Purniyan, Satya Hindi social media anchoring workshop praise worthy

[@keharsingh1002]

विष्णु पुराण में जम्बूद्वीप को चार भागों में बताया गया है, भारत वर्ष,किम्पुरूष वर्ष,हरि वर्ष, उत्तरकुरु वर्ष ।

[@satyawanpundir7243]

राम पुनियानी जी वास्तव मे बहुत ही अनुभवी व विशेषज्ञता से ओतप्रोत व्यक्तित्व है।

[@bhoopsingh4960]

The great 👍 Constitution of India Save Constitution Save DEMOCRACY.

[@Gurmailsingh-nt4jx]

?

[@girdharrathi6728]

भारतेन्दु: "भारत दुर्दशा", मैथिलीशरण गुप्त: "भारत-भारती"। "पाणिनी कालीन भारत"-- वासुदेव शरण अग्रवाल। व्याकरण और काव्यशास्त्र भी देखना चाहिए। बंगाल में भारतवर्ष ही है भारत के लिए। कालिदास किस देश का भूगोल बता रहे हैं। कुल सवाल उलझे हुए हैं।

[@girdharrathi6728]

Imagined Communities, ie Nations.

[@milansopariwala1350]

Nahi tha toh khangress ne BHARAT jodo yatra kyu nikali thi? Tab pattalchat pattalkaro ne awaz kyu nahi uthayi thi? 🤬

[@errahulmali7486]

भारत(भरत) 👉👉बुद्ध को कहा गया है 🙏🙏

[@ramanuj8443]

भरत जब भारत हुआ, उस काल में बुद्ध का अस्वातित ही नहीं था 😮😮😮😮😮😮

[@errahulmali7486]

@@ramanuj8443 aap jis bhi ishwar ki baat kar rahe ho, unka koi evidence nahi, hoga bhi kyu kyuki ye Kalpanik Character hai 🙏

[@hariduttsharma7266]

Excellent marvelous fantastic fabulous Puniani sir dono ke jore Historical Being a Historian I like these kinds of decisions Ashirwad

[@Neerajkavi14563]

बुद्ध को ही भारत कहा जाता है। और बुद्ध के नाम पर ही इस देश का नाम भारत है।

[@himdude9637]

Fir to bahut achha hua Hindu logo ne badal kar Bharat kar diya

[@AAKASHH367]

​@@himdude9637 India😂

[@himdude9637]

@@AAKASHH367 😂🤣

[@satpalnanglu5741]

Right information given by Sir Puniyani

[@satyawanpundir7243]

भारत या इंडिया का लिंग् कैसे तय हुआ? जब देश की बात होती है तब यह पुलिंग बन जाता है और जब मिट्टी की बात आती है तब यह भारतमाता स्त्रीलिंग बन जाता है? कैसे व क्या सार्थकता है?

[@rajendraverma1577]

यह ग्रंथ कब लिखे गए, उसके लेखन के काल पर कोई प्रमाण नहीं है। लेकिन ये सभी चौथी, पांचवीं या सातवी शताब्दी के मध्य लिखे गए ऐसी बात स्क्रिप्ट में हुए विकास के आधार पर प्रमाणित होता है।

[@mrsarkar6933]

Excellent discussion Dr Ram puniyani ji 🇮🇳♥️

[@69bungo]

Bharat is the another name of Bhagwan Buddha. Its mention is found in a 6th century book called Manjushrikalp which is a historical book. Bharat name came from there.

[@SureshKumar-qb1vj]

This is a very intectualistic conversation. After decimating kaurvas,arjun proceeded to conquer east ,the naga domain and brought a wife called udipi .the purpose was to expand the domain ,though by building relationship through through the power wielded by pandavs.

[@kkrayray7809]

Leftist dogs

[@vidyadharnprabhu]

Mera bharat mahan ❤

[@publicvoice2360]

Ek Modi ko cchorh ke sabhi bayimaan

[@fakhirmohammed7453]

Sir mai aap dono ka bahut Aadar aur samman karta hoon. Aap bahut sachchi baat batate hain.

[@aseemtakyar7793]

Dalle, Focus only on Punchure Shop.

[@abdullatifsheikh4463]

Exellent,good presentation

[@sheelamahar5711]

ग़ैर ज़रूरी विषय है ये चर्चा का । सब सियासी खेल है ये हमें समझना चाहिए ।

[@puchipapu]

असल में भारत नाम कहाँ से आया बात ये है पंजाब में एक बहुत बड़ा कबीला था।जिसका नाम भराता था।जब बाकी कबीले भी भराता कबीले में जुड़ गए तो वो एक बहुत बड़े कबीलों का संगठन हो गया तब उन्होंने अपना नाम भराता से भारत कर दिया ।यही नाम आगे चलकर प्रचलित हुआ ।इंडिया को जितने भी नाम मिले हैं वो पंजाब, सिंध से ही मिले हैं

[@gyanprakashbharajduhaj8992]

इन इतिहास कारों ने ही बन्टाधार किया?

[@Abhishek-k1m6n]

जॉर्ज सोरोस का पैसा समय समय पर पहुंच जाता है दलालों के पास।

[@iforindia8509]

दल्लो की लगी पड़ी है अभी पप्पू brussels गया है वहा से नया एजेंडा लेकर आयेगा और ये दल्ले उसी बीन पर नाचते दिखेंगे, लिख कर लेलो 🇮🇳

[@aseemtakyar7793]

Well Said 👍

[@wahajulhaq]

आजकल इतिहास से नहीं राजनीतिक लाभ से सरोकार है । भारत देश था की नहीं था इस पर बहस से क्या होगा ।

[@sushildwivedi2315]

बहुत सार्थक और स्पष्ट जानकारी देने वाली परिचर्चा के लिए साधुवाद।मेरा मानना यह है कि उस ज़माने में मोदी या योगी जैसे पीएम या मुख्यमंत्री तो थे नहीं कि इलाहाबाद और मुगलसराय का नाम बदलने का काम किया हो ? अगर हमारे देश का नाम पहले से ही भारत होता तो इंडिया क्यों कहा जाता ? अमेरिका या किसी अन्य देश का नाम तो वही रहा जो पहले से था ? तुर्किये ज़रूर अपवाद है लेकिन ऐसा तो अभी कुछ दिन पहले हुआ है। अतः इस बेकार की बात को तूल देना निरर्थक और राजनीति से प्रेरित प्रतीत होता है।

[@panditsatishattri306]

भारत के दक्षिण में भरत नाट्यम को राजा भरत के द्वारा आरंभ मानते हैं।

[@mdgupta2296]

अच्छी चर्चा

[@sultanlimba4366]

देश का नाम भी विदेशी है । धर्म का नाम भी विदेशीयों ने दिया है तो हमारा अपना क्या है।

[@krishnasarkar4287]

Bharat Mata ki jai

[@harshadpandit5797]

Say India Mata ki Jai India is secular Bharat is Sanatani.

[@user-or7li8th3b]

​@@harshadpandit5797Bharat =India=Hindustan (It's in the constitution India that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States) is not anyone's propreitory

[@harshadpandit5797]

@@user-or7li8th3b you must live as a secular citizen. Not Sanatani Sanatani is non constitutional.

[@shivajinavale6549]

पुनियानीजीं का एक वैशिष्ट है कीं वो भारतीय एक विचारधारा को कम समजते है और आक्रांताका जादा महत्व देते है

[@kaushlendrasingh8881]

बिल्कुल गर्ग साहब साहब से सहमत हैं।

[@rakeshsingh344]

श्रीमान जी इंडिया से इतना प्रेम था तो ईस्ट इंडिया से क्यों इतना नफरत हो रही थी

[@AAKASHH367]

Indian ka nam East India se 1000 sal pahileka hai Greeks ne INDICA me mention Kiya hai

[@Nikhilsingh.vk.0086]

सच बताऊं तो भारत नाम का कोई देश था ही नहीं भारत कई राज्यों में बंटा हुआ था अलग-अलग राजाओं के राजा अलग-अलग राज्यों से लड़ते थे😢 हमारा देश के कई रियासतें थी जो अलग-अलग थे हुआ था एक नहीं था तभी अंग्रेजी ने हम पर शासन क्यों मुगलों ने हम पर शासन किया फूट डालो और राज करो की नीति अपनाई😢

[@ved_vidhya_adhyatam]

akal ke Andhe Tune Vikramaaditya Gradhbhil, Samudragupta Ashokaditya ka naam nahi suna jinhone pure desh ko Bharatkhand rakha tha.... Rigveda me 10 tribes ke apas me ladne ki kahani thi, jo sab Apne aap ko Bharatvanshi bataya hain...

[@baldeoprasad1766]

@@ved_vidhya_adhyatam ulu ke patha mangrant ved puran jinhe pandaon ne apne hit me likha usiko hum sahi mane kya

[@sunilkumarsrivastava7207]

वेद एक धार्मिक ग्रंथ है , इतिहास का नहीं। इतिहास की बातें धार्मिक ग्रंथों से नहीं तय की जा सकती।

[@abdulsattarlucknowi7910]

​@@baldeoprasad1766Ved Vidhya Par 👉Ek 👉 Zoar'daar 👉"Thappad", 👋👋👋👋👋

[@bhagwansapkale5631]

​@@abdulsattarlucknowi7910पर तुम तो विदेशी मुस्लिमो के हरम से निकले नाजायज पैदाइश हो जिसे खुद अरब मुस्लिम नही गुलाम मानते है इसका क्या और एक तुम लोग ही अरबो तुर्को मंगोल मे अपने अब्बूओ की खोजबीन कर रहे हो एक तो तुम विदेशी हो या गुलाम हो और विदेशीयो को भारत की जानकारी कहा हो सकती है और गुलाम तो गुलाम होते इनकी खुद को कोई इतिहास नही होता है

[@stratmanone490]

Megasthanes named this land as Jambu Dweep. He said that areas across Indus ie, Afghanistan and Iran was called Bharat. He came and lived in the court of Chandragupta Maurya when he wrote his book Indica.

[@francishembrom3607]

Bharat name is sourced from two Santali Words, Santali language is a part of greater Austro-Asiatic language group stretched from polinasia, Indonesia, Malesia, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, to India. Bharat= Bhorot= Bhor + O̠t= Blessed Land in Santali.

[@rashidaukani5287]

Nice

[@nandkumarvagarya3143]

India and Bharat are two sides of the same coin.

[@solo.traveller1972]

सब के हाथ में एक खिलौना पकड़ाया,मोदी सरकार ने ,और सब लोग भारत भारत खेलने लगे,बाकी मुद्दों से ध्यान हटाना मकसद था वो पूरा कतवरहे है आप लोग

[@kritikasharma22times]

कोटि-कोटि धन्यवाद 🙏

[@jaspalsingh2075]

Agar Bharat naam ka desh hota toh naa Mughal shasan kar paate naa hi angrez

[@dongewala]

Bharata was a king of whole subcontinent

[@mohammedmuzammilshaikh736]

Superb Analysis.

[@basantbatra9061]

इंडिया कहा तो ठीक और भारत लिखा तो विवाद। ऐसा क्यों। इंडिया that is भारत तो भारत that is इंडिया क्यों नहीं। इसपर विवाद नहीं होना चाहिए।

[@srsinghsingh9952]

अब इसे सुनो कितना निकृष्ट ,निरीह और निर्लज्जता का परिचय दे रहा है,अरे ये भारत देश ही है,जो भारत था,

[@kakulid7286]

भारत का नक्सा ही मूगल और अंग्रेज़ ने बनाया है . पहले छोटे छोटे राज्य था अलग अलग राज्य का राजा था उनने अपना राज्य कि सिमा तक ही सीमित था कोई राष्ट्र नाम का शब्द नही था . मुगल शासक आये उनने छोटे छोटे राज्य कि राजाओं को हरा कर अपना राज्य में शामिल किया .बहुत सारे राज्य जब जिते तो साम्राज्य कहलाया . मुगल के बाद अंग्रेजों कि शासन आया और उनने और कूछ राजाओं को हरा कर अपना सम्राज्य में जोड़ा और उनको रास्ट्र का नाम दिया गया . आज जो भारत I NIDA का नक्शा है वो मुगल बादशाहोऔर अंग्रेज कि देन है .

[@ashishmishra9847]

​@@VikramSingh-if2yfLoha k प्रोफेसर

[@SHAHALAM-ve5nr]

भरत नाम का कोई राजा था ही नहीं इतिहास

[@maujrefreshing6060]

Brilliant

[@IAworldImtiyazahmadrazvi]

पुनियानी साहब एक महान इतिहासकार हैं

[@anilsaxena6226]

Punyani sahib is a medical doctor.

[@Dr.PrabhakiranJain-te2uf]

ओडिशा में खंडगिरि उदयगिरि में स्थित खारवेल शिलालेख में "भरदवस्स " भारतवर्ष का उल्लेख आता है।

[@ved_vidhya_adhyatam]

Sabse bada Samduragupta ka tha, jinhone South India bhi jeeta tha,after defecting Pandyas,Unhone Bharat ko Bharatvarsh kaha tha...

[@dhirendrawaghela1319]

Enlightening and highly informative❤

[@JR-fm8tx]

I would hv loved it if proofs were given with dates

[@satyendrasinghbhadauriya]

उम्मीद थी कि उर्दू और फ़ारसी में भी देश का नाम क्या था और हो सकता है इस पर भी विस्तार से बहस होती तो अच्छा होता। अंग्रेजों से पहले तुर्क, मुसलमान शासक रहे थे और अदालत में राजस्व विभाग में उर्दू शब्दों का उपयोग ही होता है फिल्मों में भी ऊर्दू शब्द ही व्यवहृत रहे हैं, और हैं। इस परिप्रेक्ष्य के हिसाब से हिंदुस्तान शब्द ही चलता है लेकिन उसका अर्थ हिंदू धर्म से कदापि नहीं होता। दलित साहित्य पर अकादमिक काम करने वाले,विचारक , भाषा वैज्ञानिक, इतिहासकार प्रो राजेन्द्र प्रसाद सिंह हिंदूकुश पर्वत का आधार डॉक्टर बच्चन सिंह की व्याकरण एवम् भाषा संबंधी बुक से देते हुए बताते हैं कि सिंधु से हिंदू नहीं बना बल्कि हिन्दू से सिंधु बना इस प्रकार हिंदू शब्द पुराना है। हिमालय का प्राचीन नाम हिंदूकुश था। मेरे ख्याल से पर्शियन "इंडस" से "हिंदू" बना है। उम्मीद है आगे इस पर डिबेट की जाएगी लेकिन डिबेट भाषा वैज्ञानिकों एवं इतिहासकारों को बुलाकर की जाएगी।

[@drnavranggautam2671]

सम्पूर्ण जैन साहित्य एवं बौद्ध साहित्य में देश का नाम जम्बूद्वीप आता है न कि भारत ! इसी प्रकार अशोक के शिलालेखों में भी देश का नाम जम्बूद्वीप आता है, न कि भारत।

[@deepak-maan009]

Uska kaaran yeh hai kyunki rishi kashyap ke naam par Kashmir hai aur WO liwercaste ke Hindu ko padhne likhne nahi dete the aur aapne aapko superior maante the tabhi to nikal diya Kashmir se koi kuch nahi kar paya liwercaste ka to fayda hai paisa kamao aayeashi karo uppercaste ko jaanedo army mai faltu ki chinta kya karna

[@LinaGonsalves-y6b]

Pradhan mantri took ten years to realize that the name of hindustan or India should now be changed to bharat. This man is suffering

[@baldevsidhu7719]

First they wanted it call Hindustan first, then realized this name was given by Muslims . Then started calling Bharat !

[@smshafique9873]

😅😊

[@smshafique9873]

Khalal hai dimagh ka😅

[@factsbysunil1475]

@@baldevsidhu7719 to kya khalistan bole...

[@baldevsidhu7719]

@@factsbysunil1475 why not ! Chaddi do you know what Khalistan means?

[@khalidbinasim6942]

Very good

[@rupayelve9853]

प्रोफेसर पुनियानी 'भरहुत' स्तुप हैं। कहीं उससे तो भारत नाम प्रचलित नहीं हुआ।

[@kcmuanpuia]

Ab hum ko beete 9 saal ne sikha diya ki - Desh ko sikshit karna hi sabse bada emergency hai. Jo whatsApp forward mila, wahi pahli bar history aur geography ka parichay hoga to log gumrah nahin kiye jaenge kya?

[@vj5671]

Chanakya was the first person, who define the boundary of bharat.

[@errahulmali7486]

Chanakya fake hai 🤣🤣😂😂 Koi evidence nahi hai 😂😂🤣🤣

[@vj5671]

@@errahulmali7486 agar tumhe kuch nahi pata to iska matlab ye nahi ki wo sahi nahi...

[@baldeoprasad1766]

@@vj5671 malum kuchh toh tumko nahi. Chanakya brahmins dwara phailaya gaya fake news

[@jidrit999]

muhammad ka bhi koi evidence nahi hai@@errahulmali7486

[@neenaobhrai273]

Puniya ji is a very well known in history ..🙏

[@vishnukumaragarwal9293]

आसम और उत्तर पूर्व के राजय पर "अहोम" वंश के राजाओ ने लगभग 600 साल तक शासन किया जो अंगरेजी शासन के साथ खतम हुआ। अहोम वंश के राजा चीन से चल खर थाइलेड होते हुए बरमा के रास्ता, असम मे आए थे और राज किया।

[@malasinha6978]

Bharat se purani India hai.

[@ShyamKumar-op5jg]

आप दोनो को नमस्कार 🎉🎉❤

[@mohammedfaizuddin5864]

The word “Bharat” is a masculine word. Why it’s called “Bharat Mata”

[@VIKASKUMAR-gj7xy]

bharat ka naam jambudeep tha .baad main jab manusmriti likhi gayi tab se bharat bola gya .

[@rmnair90]

Ashok had dominion over most of the sub-continent. Did he call it Bharat. What did he call it? Did Kalinga recognize Bharatvarsha? During the Gupta period, how did they refer to their kingdom? Does Kalidas in Meghdootam talk of Bharat. During that time, a number of Chinese scholars traveled to the subcontinent. They left extensive records. How did they refer to the area they had traveled to? One of the routes by which Buddhism traveled to Central asia was via Tibet. What term did the Lamas of Tibet use? The Cholas established an empire in Southeast Asia. The term they used was Cholamandalam, not Bharatvarsha.

[@राष्ट्रप्रहरीजयभारत]

मदर इंडिया i.e.भारत माता👍👍👍👍

[@sandeepsinghmaurya9769]

India That is Bharat 👍👊🇮🇳

[@atindrabardapurkar1138]

No my friend Bharat that is India 🇮🇳🙏 This is appropriate

[@mangalsoy3304]

राजाओं👑 के नाम पर अगर देश का नाम रखा जाता है, तो हमारे देश का नाम आज मोदी होना चाहिए ।

[@NeerajKumar-uu3ym]

😂😂😂😂 Koi Raja Baja ke naam per bharat ka naam nahi pada

[@aniljain5137]

ऋषभदेव के पुत्र भरत चक्रवर्ती के नाम भारतखंडे जब्बूद्वीप भारतखंडे, हिमवर्ष भी कहलाता है

[@arvinddhiman949]

Bharat he Nam hai

[@MM-qs8io]

देश के लोग भात ज्यादा कहते थे।इसलिए कुछ समय तक उन्हें बाहर से आने वाले भातीय कहने लगे। बाद में अकाल ज्यादा पड़ने लगे तो केवल भात ही भात खाने के कारण लोगो के पेट बहुत बढ़ गए और शरीर दुबला हो गया।अब भातीय होना गलत अर्थ में लिया जाने लगा।तब लोगों ने नाम बदल कर भारतीय कर लिया।इस प्रकार सब हो गया।बाकी क्या बताएं।

[@ramanuj8443]

नही ..नही भाई साब कुछ बाकी बचा- खुचा हो तो ओ भी ज्ञान वर्धन कर ही दो , कहीं इतिहास की किताब में पकड़ नहीं आया था

[@baldeoprasad1766]

Excellent..haste haste mere pet me bal pad gaye yaar😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁🙏

[@RakeshMish]

मुकेश जी मेरे दादाजी ने मुझे मेरे बचपने में देश का नाम भारत बताया था , मेरे पूछने पे की उनको कौन बताया तो उनके दादा ने उनको बताया था इस प्रकार ये हिमालय से दक्षिण के सागर तक का पूरा क्षेत्र भारत कहलाता था । अब आप ये मत कहना की अंग्रेज धरती के इस भूखंड को बना के गये थे और ये ब्राह्मण सब बकवास करते हैं । अब आप जैसे मूर्खों को कौन समझाए , आपकी बुद्धि पर तरस आता है , अपने अंदर समझ बढ़ाइए , पढ़े लिखे होने से आप विद्वान नहीं बन जाते ।

[@goodhuman6936]

Thanks for this information.

[@subhshchandradomkundwar5156]

Asok ke sila lekh men chandragup maurya ka vrnn milta hai ? Please reply.

[@VijaySharma-t3j]

मुगल सल्तनत भारत में कितने वर्ष तक राज कर या मुस्लिम शासको ने कब तक राज कर इस देश पर कितने वर्ष तकराज किया इसके बारे में कुछ जानकारी बताएं ताकि हमें पता चले इसके बारे में

[@milyorebara4694]

10 वर्षों से बहुत हुआ जुमलों और मानुवाद की मार अबकी बार जुमला मुक्त और मानुवाद मुक्त इंडिया जय इंडिया जय संविधान जय भारत जय स्टालिन भाई

[@Bhartiya391]

6 th century ki pustak, jo tibbet mein hai. Uskme likha hai ki bharat, buddha ka ek naam tha. Us pustak ka naam manjushre hai.

[@Jaisingh-b8l]

Budha ek upadhi thi kyunki bhot se budh huye h gautam budh se phle agr prsent ke hisab se dekhe tibat me ab bhi dalyi lama ek pdh ya upadhi jo smay samy pr utradhikari chuna jata h To kya bharat nam ke vykti ne budh ke liye chuna gya tha 😊

[@UmeshYadav-mw4dj]

चुनावी फायदा के लिए भाजपा श्रीराम और श्रीकृषण को समय समय पर उछालती रहती है लेकिन वे दोनों भगवान का अवतार होते हुए भी अपने देश का नाम भारत रखना उचित नहीं समझा।

[@naunihal1450]

India he Bharat ha Bharat he India ha

[@RLekhy]

No, never. India is a historical name at least in the sense that some Greek and Roman travelers have mentioned India as nation or subcontinent as before as in the 5th century BCE. Bharat is completely a mythological and appeared in the Hindu Scriptures which were written only between 2nd century and 10th century AD.

[@SatpalVerma000]

India didn't exist before 1947. Italy didn't exist before 1860. Turkey didn't exist before 1914 and so on. Concept of Countries was invented in Europe in the 16th century. Before the invention of the concept of countries, there were only empires and kingdoms. Turkey was created after the fall of the Ottomans empire. Dozens of countries were created based on nationalities after the fall of the Ottomans empire. Italy was created in 1860 by merging various small kingdoms of Italian nationality. Similarly, Germany was created in 1871 by merging various small kingdoms of German nationality. Similarly, all European countries were created based on nationalities. Now the question is what is nation and nationality? A nation is a society that shares a common language, culture, and history and has shared interests. For example English, German, Italian, Turkish, French, Russian, Dutch, Spanish, Japanese, Korean, Punjabi, kashmiri, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Thai etc are nations and a country based on single nation or nationality is called a nation state. Most countries in Europe are based on single nationalities and are nation states or simply called nations. India was created out of the British Indian empire on the basis of two nations bogus theory. Two nations were assumed as Islam and hindusim. But in reality, Islam and Hinduism are not nations. A nation is a society that shares a common language, culture, and history and has shared interests. For example, English, French, Russian, Dutch, germans, Spanish, Japanese, Korean, Punjabi, kashmiri, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Thai etc are nations. There are dozens of nations within India and Pakistan. And hence India and Pakistan are union of nations or multinationalcountries. Nations are Punjab, Kashmir, sindh, Baluchistan, Gujarat, Bengal, Maharashtra, Tamilnadu etc. And in modern world countries are created on basis of nationality like the countries in Europe (England, France, Germany, Poland, Norway, Sweden, Croatia etc) or in Asia (Korea, Japan, China,Thailand, Philippines etc) and Bangladesh etc are countries based on nationalities. But India and Pakistan were not created based on nationalities but on two nation (Islam Hinduism) bogus theory. Hence, these countries are based on religions. Bangladesh was created on the basis of Bangla nationality in 1971.. Punjab should be a free country based on Punjabi nationality like Bangladesh. But Hindu Punjabis and Muslims punjabi don't want to leave india and Pakistan, so we Punjabi Sikhs can't force them to follow us. Hindu Punjabis, who had deserted Punjabi language in 1951 and 1961 census by declaring Hindi as their mother tongue would never support a Punjabi nation state. They support a Indian state based on the Hindu religion. Similarly, Punjabi Muslims of Pakistan dont support Punjabi nation state either. They support Pakistan state that is based on Islam religion. Similarly, Bengali Hindus don't support Bangla nation state Bangladesh and want to live in India which is based on Hinduism. So Punjabi muslims, Punjabi Hindus, and Bengali Hindus are free to stay in their respective countries based on religions. But similar to Bangla Muslims of East Pakistan, who created Bangla nation state Bangladesh without Indian Bengali Hindus, Sikhs have the right to create Azad Punjab (a Punjabi nation state) without Punjabi Hindus and Punjabi Muslims. As simple as that. We Punjabi Sikhs have no problem living in a Punjabi Muslims or Punjabi Hindu majority Punjabi nation state. The Punjabi speaker population of Muslims is around 10 crore. Punjabi speaking population of Hindus is around 3 crore (Punjabi Hindus in Punjab, Himchal, Haryana, Jammu and Delhi). Punjabi speaker Sikh population is around 2 crore. Hence Sikhs would be minority if both Punjabi muslims and Hindus or either one of them come form a Punjabi nation state with us Sikhs. But their radicals minds prefer religion over their nationality and they love to give up their Punjabi nationality and adopt Hindi and Urdu nationality in order to create a state based on their respective religions. So when Sikhs alone form a Punjabi nation state, it would automatically be a Sikh majority Punjabi nation state called Khalistan. What's in the name? You can name it whatever you want. But in practice it would be Khalistan just like India is a Hindu rashtra in practice regardless of its official name or regardless of its constitution...

[@RLekhy]

@@SatpalVerma000 too much blah blah