Omega Speedmaster Date Automatic 3210.50.00 Omega Watch Review

[@dancarlton7973]

Beautiful watch, with the 7750 based movement.

[@henrywest7217]

Beautiful piece. Classically functional.

[@darrenmoyer269]

Would you have any advice on the omega speedmaster 3210.50 vs the seamaster 2531.80 for a first watch purchase?

[@edwardsauve4836]

I like this , classic , serious , scientific , nothing frivilous here , beautiful .

[@robertn3121]

Went for the 30.01.006 for the larger size, but this is a beauty...

[@fpoynton1604]

Wow , what a Classic versatile fully functional beautiful timepiece . " Timeless " design was the perfect descriptor to apply to this piece. I have not seen this one. - its amazing - with the most appealing tough 1st gen planet ocean cues giving a strength to the look of its speedmaster core = Beefed up but perfectly classic. Awesome.

[@FirestormAA]

Love Omega! Awesome review Tim!

[@davedhayden]

What is the difference between this and the red white blue reference 3210.52.00

[@jonsmith5354]

What is the difference between this and the 3515.50?

[@omega_saxonia]

100m waterresist, but crown not screwed? How can that be? I am confused....

[@tantran5242]

how big is your wrist ?

[@mikemiller1646]

What are the years of production for the model 3210.50?

[@Vaquero666]

2010

[@mirceacostin1935]

Don't overdo it with recommending it for a 13.5mm wrist, Tim. It's OK to want to sell watches but don't lie...

[@AR-hw9zi]

Funny shit

[@alexandruistrate2]

Really funny shit:))

[@carloszx12]

Went to website and it's not there...seems like a bit of waste of time...

[@andrei2023]

🆒🆒🆒🆒